ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- September 20, 2022
Chrystia Freeland was once a WEF critic
Episode Stats
Length
3 minutes
Words per Minute
152.97281
Word Count
512
Sentence Count
20
Misogynist Sentences
1
Hate Speech Sentences
1
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
Now, with Chrystia Freeland right there at the very top of the World Economic Forum's advisory board,
00:00:08.060
you literally have a member of Klaus Schwab's board sitting at the cabinet table here in Canada.
00:00:14.920
The irony is that Chrystia Freeland, who was once a prolific journalist,
00:00:19.780
was once a staunch critic of the World Economic Forum and wrote an excellent book about it
00:00:24.940
called The Plutocrats, The Rise of the New Global Super Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else,
00:00:30.360
which was published in 2012.
00:00:32.720
I had the pleasure of rereading this book a couple of weeks ago.
00:00:37.040
And as I reread the book, I came to the conclusion that Chrystia Freeland really has done a 180
00:00:43.100
from being an outsider looking in and being critical of the organization and of the super elites
00:00:48.880
to as a cozy and insider as you can get.
00:00:52.520
And what's doubly ironic is that many of the critiques of what happens in Davos
00:00:58.400
and the power of the super rich and the super elites who gather there
00:01:02.060
that are now being dismissed as rants and raves of far-right conspiracy theorists
00:01:07.260
are actually things that Freeland herself pointed out in her book.
00:01:11.360
So if today's critics are right-wing conspiracy theorists,
00:01:15.500
today's critics of the World Economic Forum are right-wing conspiracy theorists,
00:01:19.040
then where exactly does that leave Freeland?
00:01:23.220
Now back to Mr. Monk, the managing director of the World Economic Forum.
00:01:27.300
His claim is that Davos is just an innocuous talking shop.
00:01:30.880
But here's a telling passage from The Plutocrats.
00:01:33.340
The vampire squid theory of the super elite is entertaining and emotionally satisfying.
00:01:38.900
It can be fun to imagine the super elites who went to Wall Street
00:01:42.400
and their Harvard classmates who became economics professors
00:01:45.460
and those who became U.S. senators participating in a grand conspiracy
00:01:50.280
hatched ideally at the Porcelian Club to rip off the middle class.
00:01:55.580
But the impact of these networks is much less cynical and much more subtle,
00:02:01.940
though not necessarily of less consequence.
00:02:04.500
So basically what Freeland is saying here is,
00:02:08.780
and something I describe in my column as well,
00:02:12.420
is that when people spend a lot of time together in an environment
00:02:17.400
where work and socializing intermingle,
00:02:20.840
whether it is in a university fraternity at Davos every year
00:02:25.820
or at other venues where power elites routinely come together,
00:02:30.660
a shared mindset develops of what needs to be done,
00:02:34.020
whether it's to combat inequality,
00:02:37.860
deal with climate change,
00:02:39.760
or how do you handle a pandemic like COVID-19.
00:02:43.980
And it's also well known that there's a revolving door
00:02:47.460
between the top echelons of government,
00:02:49.880
the private sector, and academia.
00:02:52.480
None of this is hard to understand.
00:02:55.000
Think about it.
00:02:55.720
When like-minded people get together,
00:02:57.580
they reinforce each other's beliefs,
00:02:59.680
and meeting frequently and often is key to that.
00:03:03.660
So whether it's a bunch of activists getting together
00:03:06.200
to talk about their cause or a bunch of sports fans getting together,
00:03:11.480
it's basically normal human psychology
00:03:14.360
that people in this kind of situation
00:03:16.660
will tend to share assumptions, beliefs, views, and even ideologies.
Link copied!