ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- September 08, 2021
Conservatives need to stop running away from their conservatism
Episode Stats
Length
39 minutes
Words per Minute
179.49893
Word Count
7,179
Sentence Count
351
Misogynist Sentences
3
Hate Speech Sentences
7
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
Welcome to Canada's Most Irreverent Talk Show.
00:00:06.660
This is the Andrew Lawton Show, brought to you by True North.
00:00:12.720
Coming up, firearms flip-flops, the politics of integrity,
00:00:16.720
and Rod Taylor from the Christian Heritage Party.
00:00:20.480
The Andrew Lawton Show starts right now.
00:00:24.060
Hello and welcome. This is Canada's Most Irreverent Talk Show here on True North.
00:00:31.740
The Andrew Lawton Show, Wednesday, September 8th, 2021.
00:00:36.760
Tonight is debate day, at least for the first official French language debate.
00:00:41.500
I know we had last week the TVA debate, but that was the unofficial French debate.
00:00:45.720
This is the official French debate, and then tomorrow we'll have the official English debate,
00:00:50.240
and, in fact, the only English language debate of the entire election campaign.
00:00:55.620
And I'm not going to tell you where to tune in, except for True North.
00:00:59.020
We are going to be broadcasting the debate live.
00:01:01.540
We have a pre-show starting up at 8 p.m. Eastern.
00:01:04.200
We'll have the debate live for you on all of our social media channels starting at 9,
00:01:09.020
and then we'll have some analysis after the fact.
00:01:11.540
And I'm going to actually be on the ground in Ottawa.
00:01:14.400
I'm actually on my way to... This is pre-recorded, if you hadn't been able to tell.
00:01:18.000
I'm actually on my way to Ottawa right now to be able to cover the debate,
00:01:22.180
the French language and English language debates,
00:01:24.260
and hopefully get some questions to the leaders in the post-debate scrums.
00:01:28.800
And you know what? I didn't even have to sue my way in this time.
00:01:32.080
You may remember in 2019, True North was not accredited,
00:01:35.580
so we had to go to federal court and have an emergency hearing,
00:01:39.240
and we were granted an injunction.
00:01:41.040
It was a very positive day, I'd say, for press freedom in court.
00:01:45.240
This year, we didn't have to.
00:01:46.400
The Leaders Debates Commission accredited us.
00:01:48.960
Now, they didn't accredit Rebel,
00:01:50.280
so Rebel is fighting it out in court and awaiting a decision.
00:01:54.560
But I will say that one of the big things I'm looking forward to at this debate,
00:01:58.400
if we get the chance to go into the scrums and ask the questions as we're expecting,
00:02:03.380
is to put the questions to the leaders that the mainstream media is not asking.
00:02:08.740
And a lot of the time, if you find you watch these press conferences,
00:02:11.660
whether it's Trudeau or O'Toole or Singh,
00:02:14.300
the media, generally speaking, asks questions that aren't always on the radar of what Canadians are thinking.
00:02:22.040
And that's why we think we have something to add there.
00:02:24.280
So that's a little bit of a plug for our debate coverage at True North.
00:02:27.640
I want to talk about one of the big developments in the campaign in the last few days,
00:02:31.800
and not a positive one for me as a gun owner and advocate for gun owners.
00:02:36.500
And that is Aaron O'Toole's flip-flop that was almost like a triple flip
00:02:41.140
and a huge whole bunch of flop on firearms.
00:02:44.880
Now, I want to go back a few weeks here first,
00:02:47.120
because you may remember I was actually in Ottawa when the Conservatives launched their platform.
00:02:51.700
And I was in, they call it a lock-up or an embargo,
00:02:54.740
where before the platform was announced,
00:02:56.600
I was able to look through and find the things that I thought were interesting
00:02:59.960
and cover them so that I was prepared when the platform was launched.
00:03:04.320
And one of the first things I looked up was what he was going to do on the firearms file,
00:03:09.520
because this is something that during the leadership last year, he was very clear on.
00:03:13.140
He said he was going to get rid of the Liberal Bill C-71.
00:03:16.500
He was going to repeal the order in council that the Liberals put in place last May,
00:03:20.960
which prohibited overnight more than 1,500 variants of firearms,
00:03:25.480
including the AR-15 and the Mini-14,
00:03:28.260
and other guns that the Liberals have called military-style assault weapons.
00:03:32.700
And in the general election campaign, I wanted to know,
00:03:35.360
was he going to be just as clear?
00:03:37.460
And he was.
00:03:38.140
It was spelled out right in the platform.
00:03:40.400
You can read it for yourself still.
00:03:42.660
We will start by repealing C-71 and the May 2020 order in council
00:03:47.700
and conducting a review of the Firearms Act with participation by law enforcement,
00:03:52.800
firearms owners, manufacturers, and members of the public.
00:03:56.460
And that's it.
00:03:57.140
That's perfectly clear.
00:03:58.400
And the Liberals decided to jump on that.
00:04:00.980
And I talked about it a little bit on the show last week.
00:04:03.740
It started in the TVA debate in Montreal
00:04:06.740
and then became the Liberals' message of the day every single day since.
00:04:11.780
Bill Blair has been doing press conference after press conference.
00:04:14.600
He's been doing the same press conference every day,
00:04:17.240
saying the same things every day,
00:04:18.940
saying that Aaron O'Toole is too cozy with the gun lobby and has a secret agenda.
00:04:23.460
And this is an election campaign,
00:04:25.560
so obviously the Liberals are going to keep attacking the Conservatives and vice versa.
00:04:29.520
But everything that Aaron O'Toole has done
00:04:32.500
has gotten the same reaction from critics.
00:04:35.920
When he said in the debate last week,
00:04:37.820
we're going to keep the ban on assault rifles,
00:04:39.940
the Liberals said, no, you're going to repeal it.
00:04:41.940
When O'Toole finally clarified his position,
00:04:43.980
the Liberals said, aha, we told you so.
00:04:46.200
And now that Aaron O'Toole has flip-flopped,
00:04:48.940
it hasn't done anything to ameliorate the concerns put forward by the Liberals.
00:04:55.780
What do I mean by flip-flop?
00:04:57.560
Well, Aaron O'Toole came out and said this.
00:05:00.620
Before I take your questions,
00:05:02.600
I'd like to respond to Justin Trudeau's latest attempt to divide Canadians.
00:05:07.760
So I want to make my position on firearms perfectly clear.
00:05:12.200
First, the ban on assault weapons will remain in place.
00:05:18.160
Second, the present ban on a number of other firearms that were reclassified in 2020 will remain in place.
00:05:26.320
Third, we will conduct a transparent review of the firearms classification process
00:05:32.480
to take the politics out of this process and engage the public in decisions with respect to public safety.
00:05:41.460
Justin Trudeau has been importing American-style politics throughout this election campaign,
00:05:47.260
and it is disappointing to see that continue.
00:05:49.620
There is no way to spin it.
00:05:51.280
There's no way to sell it.
00:05:52.300
There's no way to excuse it.
00:05:53.580
That is a flip-flop.
00:05:55.200
After days of saying that he was going to repeal the order in council,
00:05:59.160
after weeks of having that in the platform,
00:06:01.560
Aaron O'Toole came right out and said,
00:06:03.300
anything that's banned now will remain banned.
00:06:07.800
Now, did the Liberals say,
00:06:09.260
oh, well, problem solved.
00:06:10.760
All good.
00:06:11.540
No.
00:06:12.380
The Liberals jumped on to the other thing in the Conservatives' platform here,
00:06:16.680
which is that he's conducting a review.
00:06:19.240
And the Liberals are now pointing out that,
00:06:21.020
oh, well, you know what?
00:06:21.900
He's just promising a review,
00:06:23.480
which means he's going to legalize it anyway,
00:06:25.260
but he's not going to say it.
00:06:27.060
So the flip-flop has not won Aaron O'Toole any good favor
00:06:31.280
from the people who insist on peddling these bad faith and disingenuous arguments
00:06:36.180
about the previous Conservative Firearms Plan.
00:06:40.620
And if you want to understand more about why this order in council was so dangerous,
00:06:45.140
I don't want to rehash everything here,
00:06:46.680
I would encourage you to go and look up
00:06:48.460
Assaulted, Justin Trudeau's War on Gun Owners.
00:06:51.540
Specifically, I want you to look at the episode
00:06:54.060
where we looked at those in the gun business,
00:06:56.340
in the firearms industry.
00:06:58.040
I talked to a number of gun entrepreneurs,
00:07:00.600
business owners, people in the import space,
00:07:03.020
retail space,
00:07:03.920
who are out tens of thousands of dollars.
00:07:06.760
Because the Liberals in May of 2020 overnight banned 1,500 plus types of firearms,
00:07:14.140
making it illegal for these people to do anything with them.
00:07:17.460
They're still sitting on this inventory more than a year after the order in council
00:07:21.740
with the promised buyback not having yet materialized.
00:07:25.220
So understandably, a lot of people were looking to the Conservatives and saying,
00:07:30.000
throw us a friggin' bone here.
00:07:31.400
What are you going to do for us?
00:07:33.600
And when Aaron O'Toole comes out and says,
00:07:35.740
okay, anything that's banned now will remain banned,
00:07:39.180
there are two interpretations of it.
00:07:41.200
Number one, he's completely rolled and sold out the gun owners.
00:07:44.960
Number two, he realizes this is what he has to say to make the bleeding stop.
00:07:50.640
This is what he has to say to make the attack stop to win the election.
00:07:55.440
And if you look at gun owners online who are very engaged and mobilized on this,
00:08:00.000
you'll see a lot of them are split.
00:08:01.500
Some of them are saying, that's it, I'm voting for the People's Party.
00:08:04.460
Others are saying, no, no, no, just guys, just come on.
00:08:06.880
He's with us here.
00:08:07.700
He's with us.
00:08:08.960
I want to read the statement put out by the Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights,
00:08:13.000
a group that actually donated a considerable amount of money to produce Assaulted.
00:08:17.220
Tracy Wilson does fantastic work for firearms owners.
00:08:20.500
And this is the statement that the CCFR put out.
00:08:23.120
In our view, Mr. O'Toole is reacting to Justin Trudeau's attempt
00:08:26.420
to make an unnecessary election during a pandemic about gun control.
00:08:30.620
Gun control has always been a political wedge issue to the Liberals,
00:08:33.920
not a matter of public safety.
00:08:35.860
We agree with Mr. O'Toole that the classification of firearms
00:08:38.980
should not be a political process.
00:08:41.540
Mr. Trudeau has used this issue to divide Canadians
00:08:44.320
and a transparent public consultation would bring better understanding
00:08:48.320
of this topic to all Canadians.
00:08:50.460
We would welcome an opportunity to depoliticize this topic
00:08:53.720
and focus on public safety, unquote.
00:08:56.700
So what the CCFR is basically saying there
00:08:59.800
is that they're almost happy about it.
00:09:03.600
The fact that they're not coming out guns blazing,
00:09:06.280
no pun intended, and saying this is it,
00:09:08.040
this is a deal breaker, suggests they're either optimistic
00:09:10.920
that Aaron O'Toole is still going to do what he said he was going to do,
00:09:14.100
or they simply realize that he's certainly going to be,
00:09:17.520
even if he walks this part back, better than Justin Trudeau.
00:09:21.260
Both are entirely defensible positions.
00:09:23.840
If I'm a gun owner, which I am, I would look and say that,
00:09:26.960
you know what, no matter what, Justin Trudeau
00:09:28.920
has proven that he has zero interest in firearms owners,
00:09:32.380
zero interest in sports shooters,
00:09:34.360
zero interest in preserving and protecting this part of Canada.
00:09:37.820
So I understand the gun owner saying,
00:09:40.120
you know what, anyone is going to be better than the Liberals.
00:09:44.100
Even a lot of NDPers, by the way,
00:09:45.800
are better than the Liberals on this,
00:09:47.500
especially those in rural areas.
00:09:49.160
Nikki Ashton in particular is one example of this.
00:09:52.420
So here's the battleground right now.
00:09:54.800
And again, as I've said time and time again,
00:09:57.260
vote Conservative, vote PPC, vote Maverick,
00:09:59.780
vote Liberal, vote NDP, do what you want.
00:10:02.100
I'm not here to tell you how to vote.
00:10:04.240
I'm here to lay out the issues, lay out the facts,
00:10:07.000
and I'll give you my opinion.
00:10:08.060
I'll give you my analysis on these things,
00:10:10.080
which is why I want to unpack the firearms flip-flop
00:10:13.560
in a good amount of detail here.
00:10:16.240
I've said this before,
00:10:17.260
but just in case you're not aware of this,
00:10:19.860
one of the biggest sources of confusion last week
00:10:22.720
when the media still couldn't quite figure out
00:10:24.460
what O'Toole's position was,
00:10:25.940
and even now,
00:10:26.800
is that there's no universal definition of assault rifle.
00:10:30.000
What an actual assault rifle is,
00:10:31.920
the type of gun that's been banned in Canada
00:10:33.740
for, what, 44 years,
00:10:35.300
is different than what the Liberals call assault rifles,
00:10:38.680
which are basically any firearms they want to ban.
00:10:41.280
They call them an assault rifle,
00:10:42.580
and public buy-in goes through the roof
00:10:44.820
on whatever they want to outlaw.
00:10:47.100
But this game of semantics
00:10:48.500
is very difficult in an election.
00:10:50.720
So if the population is not on board with an AR-15,
00:10:54.240
you don't want to have to be the guy campaigning
00:10:56.280
to tell the people of Canada
00:10:57.580
why the AR-15 isn't as scary as they think it is.
00:11:00.180
If you're doing that,
00:11:01.200
you're going to have an uphill battle,
00:11:02.600
and the Liberals are simply going to win.
00:11:04.380
I get that.
00:11:05.800
And it's why a lot of gun owners I've spoken to
00:11:07.760
have said that they would be happy
00:11:09.480
if firearms didn't come up in the election at all.
00:11:12.360
People that have said to me,
00:11:13.360
well, you know what,
00:11:13.940
I know how the conservative politicians are on this.
00:11:16.520
I don't want them to have to, you know,
00:11:18.420
take any guff from the voters.
00:11:19.960
I'm happy if they never mention it,
00:11:21.680
we get them elected,
00:11:22.540
and then they just do it.
00:11:23.480
That's what a lot of gun owners would want,
00:11:25.460
because they realize that culturally,
00:11:27.680
these issues are very challenging to win on.
00:11:30.120
And the last week in the campaign has showed why,
00:11:32.720
because there's so much misinformation,
00:11:35.180
and in politics,
00:11:36.020
you can't be the great educator-in-chief.
00:11:38.520
You can't change people's hearts and minds on issues
00:11:41.320
when misinformation is so ingrained.
00:11:45.120
And a lot of that is the media,
00:11:46.640
which is why I think media literacy on firearms
00:11:48.700
needs to be a continued priority
00:11:50.940
for anyone that cares about this issue.
00:11:52.480
But I digress.
00:11:54.000
If the election is about guns,
00:11:55.780
Justin Trudeau wins,
00:11:56.840
Aaron O'Toole loses.
00:11:57.680
And I think Aaron O'Toole knew that.
00:12:00.300
However, I'm not defending the flip-flop for a second.
00:12:04.400
And here's why.
00:12:05.600
O'Toole decided to put it in the platform.
00:12:08.300
O'Toole's team put it very specifically in the platform.
00:12:12.700
And I read the section of the platform in question for you earlier.
00:12:16.540
I should note that now it's been amended.
00:12:18.920
There's a little footnote there,
00:12:20.160
a little teeny tiny footnote.
00:12:21.700
All firearms that are currently banned will remain banned.
00:12:27.020
So just understand this here.
00:12:29.280
We will start by repealing the May 2020 Order and Council.
00:12:34.500
And the footnote on that sentence says
00:12:36.500
anything that's banned will remain banned.
00:12:38.340
So they're going to repeal an Order and Council banning guns
00:12:41.760
while simultaneously keeping anything banned, banned.
00:12:47.140
This shows that there hasn't been a lot of thought
00:12:49.800
that has gone into this.
00:12:52.300
They had to do something.
00:12:54.400
And now they have an incomprehensible position.
00:12:56.840
And incidentally, I remember a couple of weeks back
00:12:59.780
when Aaron O'Toole put out this statement
00:13:01.680
about Cheryl Gallant at the time
00:13:03.220
in which he said that any candidate
00:13:05.260
who doesn't back the Conservative platform
00:13:07.420
in its entirety would not be allowed
00:13:09.680
to sit as a Conservative caucus member.
00:13:11.660
And I had a couple of people point out on Twitter,
00:13:13.500
does this mean that Aaron O'Toole
00:13:14.680
has to kick himself out of caucus?
00:13:16.540
Because he's no longer a supporter
00:13:18.760
of the platform that he put out.
00:13:20.320
A little bit of a cheeky political joke for you,
00:13:22.600
but one that will basically have you crying
00:13:25.140
if you can't find a way to laugh about it.
00:13:27.260
So here's the big problem.
00:13:29.900
He decided to campaign on this.
00:13:32.560
Now, sure, maybe it was to tell gun owners,
00:13:34.540
yes, I've got your back.
00:13:36.340
But if you can't own up to that
00:13:38.080
and defend that at the first sign of backlash,
00:13:41.060
why were you campaigning on it in the first place?
00:13:43.940
So there's a bigger point there.
00:13:46.680
A lot of people I know would be content to say,
00:13:49.360
listen, if he gets elected on the economy
00:13:51.040
and on jobs and on COVID recovery,
00:13:52.880
not on guns, I'm fine with it
00:13:54.740
as long as he does the gun stuff,
00:13:56.940
as long as he does the repeal
00:13:58.240
and goes with Bill C-71 repealing and all of that.
00:14:01.340
I don't take that view.
00:14:03.740
And here's why.
00:14:04.600
I take a very romantic view of democracy.
00:14:06.920
I know elections can be a street fight at times.
00:14:09.120
I get it.
00:14:10.700
But as it stands now,
00:14:12.220
he has told Canadians something
00:14:14.020
that if he goes back on it,
00:14:16.380
will be a broken promise.
00:14:18.080
I don't have time for wordplay.
00:14:19.720
I don't have time for semantics.
00:14:21.300
I can't stand it when Justin Trudeau does it.
00:14:23.380
So I'm not going to abide by it
00:14:25.160
when a conservative politician does it.
00:14:27.840
So if he has stopped the bleeding
00:14:29.800
and tried to get the media office back
00:14:31.380
and the liberals office back
00:14:32.460
by saying that everything that's banned
00:14:33.940
will remain banned,
00:14:35.360
anything he does against that
00:14:37.560
will simply not be a good faith effort.
00:14:40.920
Now, look, I'll support the policy
00:14:42.460
because I've been a long time on record supporter
00:14:46.320
of repealing these gun control measures
00:14:48.500
that don't do anything.
00:14:50.120
But I can't support the path to get there
00:14:52.480
if it happens in an underhanded way.
00:14:55.140
As it stands,
00:14:56.660
Aaron O'Toole would have no democratic mandate
00:14:59.520
to repeal the order in council
00:15:02.860
and to unprohibit the AR-15 and the Mini-14
00:15:06.560
if he wins an election
00:15:07.700
because he's now told people that he won't.
00:15:11.700
So there would be no democratic mandate to do it.
00:15:14.300
And I honestly believe
00:15:15.560
that winning an election at all costs
00:15:18.480
is not the goal.
00:15:19.820
You need to win
00:15:20.720
because people voted for you for a reason.
00:15:24.720
You need to win
00:15:25.720
because people endorsed your vision
00:15:27.480
or perhaps they found you to be the lesser of evils.
00:15:29.880
That's fine too.
00:15:31.780
But they need to vote for you
00:15:33.300
knowing that you're going to do something,
00:15:35.220
not because you just hoodwinked them into it.
00:15:39.140
And this is why,
00:15:40.540
as Margaret Thatcher always said so famously,
00:15:43.100
first you win the argument,
00:15:44.920
then you win the vote.
00:15:47.480
People on the right need to lay the groundwork
00:15:49.700
between elections in a long-term way
00:15:52.360
so that when elections come around,
00:15:55.680
conservative positions are not so quickly marginalized
00:15:58.960
and becoming so toxic
00:16:00.920
that overnight they need to be abandoned
00:16:03.700
by the politicians
00:16:04.620
who should be waving
00:16:05.640
the conservative banner vigorously.
00:16:09.480
Aaron O'Toole's flip-flop
00:16:10.740
is a failure of the conservative campaign
00:16:12.680
in one of two ways.
00:16:13.960
It's either a failure of the conservative campaign
00:16:15.960
to stick to their guns
00:16:17.340
or a failure to foresee
00:16:19.120
that this was going to be an issue.
00:16:20.960
Stick to your guns,
00:16:21.740
I meant in the figurative way,
00:16:23.240
but I guess it also works in the literal way.
00:16:24.860
It's either a failure of them to hold firm
00:16:27.360
or a failure of them to foresee
00:16:29.520
that something was obviously going to be an issue.
00:16:32.080
Of course the liberals were going to run
00:16:33.780
on the conservatives like assault rifles.
00:16:36.060
What did we expect them to do?
00:16:37.700
All they have are these half-baked emotional ideas,
00:16:41.320
which is why when Justin Trudeau
00:16:42.760
appeared behind a lectern
00:16:44.100
that had a so-called assault rifle on the sign,
00:16:47.320
on the placard with a line through it,
00:16:48.720
I'm like, of course,
00:16:49.620
the liberals have probably had that printed off
00:16:51.420
for six months,
00:16:52.480
just waiting for the right day
00:16:53.900
for them to trot it out.
00:16:57.520
But conservatives cannot be the cowards.
00:17:03.360
Conservatives have to stand for something,
00:17:05.620
and if conservatives say they're going to do something
00:17:07.620
and they're going to stand for something,
00:17:09.120
they have to be prepared to not cower
00:17:11.380
at the first sign of blowback,
00:17:14.100
which you know is going to happen,
00:17:15.580
you know is coming.
00:17:17.280
This is not like one of these weird attacks
00:17:19.420
that just came out of nowhere
00:17:20.480
that you didn't know was going to happen,
00:17:21.980
like if someone started to just like,
00:17:23.700
you know, declare war on Aaron O'Toole's
00:17:25.840
animal welfare plan or something.
00:17:27.360
No, they knew this was coming.
00:17:30.140
Why did they not have a better defense?
00:17:32.280
Why has Aaron O'Toole not been spinning this
00:17:34.480
to Justin Trudeau
00:17:35.360
and asking the very firm
00:17:36.820
but very necessary question,
00:17:38.240
Prime Minister, define assault rifle.
00:17:40.320
Well, I know Aaron O'Toole is going to get hit on this
00:17:44.060
in the debate.
00:17:44.700
He's going to get hit on it in the French debate.
00:17:46.560
He's going to get hit on it in the English debate.
00:17:50.080
And I'm guessing his answer is going to be,
00:17:52.700
well, yes, you know, we're going to do a review
00:17:54.260
and he's just going to try to say as many words as he can
00:17:57.520
until his time runs out.
00:18:00.120
Instead of actually trying to move the ball on this issue,
00:18:02.440
it's going to be difficult.
00:18:04.080
But, you know, the old thing that I've said
00:18:05.560
time and time again
00:18:06.420
that I think people need to be reminded of here
00:18:08.220
is that you're going to get a tax for this anyway.
00:18:11.660
You as might as well live up to what you believe
00:18:14.520
and what your authentic position is.
00:18:16.480
The liberals are going to be the gun crazy gun nuts
00:18:18.860
to the liberals anyway.
00:18:20.060
So they might as well be that
00:18:21.760
because that's how they're going to be defined
00:18:24.320
by the liberals.
00:18:26.800
And you know what?
00:18:27.540
There's a level of comfort
00:18:28.520
if you just sort of release it and say,
00:18:29.900
they're going to accuse me of this anyway
00:18:31.820
so I might as well do it.
00:18:34.700
They're not going to do that, of course.
00:18:37.160
And this is why the Andrew Breitbart position,
00:18:39.580
the politics as downstream of culture,
00:18:41.560
while not radical,
00:18:42.720
is still not entirely understood.
00:18:45.860
There are so many issues
00:18:47.140
where a position that is a sensible, normal,
00:18:49.760
and I would argue mainstream position in some ways
00:18:52.100
will not be argued
00:18:53.640
and will not be advanced by conservative parties
00:18:55.760
because the institutions are against them.
00:18:57.960
The liberals, all of these NGOs,
00:19:00.680
all of these groups that rally together
00:19:02.460
and take an undeniably left-wing position
00:19:05.620
on so many issues under the sun,
00:19:07.560
whether it's healthcare,
00:19:08.520
whether it's firearms, whatever.
00:19:11.320
And you see this in the debates.
00:19:13.400
Just look at the topics
00:19:14.520
for the English language debate.
00:19:15.980
Not a single topic on foreign policy.
00:19:18.740
Reconciliation,
00:19:20.060
you have economic recovery post-COVID.
00:19:22.860
These are good topics,
00:19:24.100
but undeniably,
00:19:25.460
they are topics where the liberals
00:19:27.900
will have an advantage.
00:19:31.080
And so often,
00:19:31.980
the premise of questions put to politicians
00:19:33.980
is an inherently left-wing premise.
00:19:36.940
What are you going to do about X
00:19:38.840
is based on a left-wing premise
00:19:41.180
that every problem has a government solution.
00:19:44.780
And conservatives are always disadvantaged in this way.
00:19:48.140
Conservatives are disadvantaged
00:19:49.340
because when everyone wants to know
00:19:51.220
what you as the prime minister,
00:19:52.620
what you as the leader of a government,
00:19:53.940
are going to do,
00:19:54.980
conservatives who traditionally
00:19:56.520
are the low-tax, small-government party,
00:19:59.140
conservatives' instinctual response
00:20:00.920
will be nothing.
00:20:02.180
I'm not going to do anything
00:20:03.320
which doesn't exactly win you votes.
00:20:06.280
But you have to be prepared to own that.
00:20:10.220
I get the whole get-in-there mentality.
00:20:13.240
I do.
00:20:13.580
I really understand that.
00:20:14.960
I've gotten tired
00:20:16.020
when I used to work in partisan politics.
00:20:18.120
I got tired of losing.
00:20:19.740
You work hard.
00:20:20.780
You know your ideas are better,
00:20:21.840
but you know what, you lose.
00:20:23.100
I ran for office once.
00:20:25.280
I'm kind of glad I lost retrospectively
00:20:27.500
knowing what happened to Ontario politics
00:20:29.800
and what happened from the party
00:20:31.120
in which I ran as a candidate.
00:20:32.480
But glad to have put that behind me.
00:20:34.360
The reality is it sucks to lose.
00:20:37.820
So if someone comes along and says,
00:20:39.560
well, you can win,
00:20:40.220
but you have to say this,
00:20:41.300
say this, say this, say this,
00:20:42.960
you have no accountability
00:20:44.780
to your beliefs
00:20:46.800
or to the beliefs of the people behind you
00:20:48.720
if you do that
00:20:49.580
because you haven't actually got elected
00:20:52.380
on anything that matters.
00:20:56.160
And whenever anyone says,
00:20:57.700
well, if you don't vote for X,
00:20:59.600
you're just sentencing Canada
00:21:00.860
to four more years at Trudeau,
00:21:02.120
I say, listen,
00:21:03.280
I'm completely on board
00:21:04.560
if someone wants to make a decision
00:21:05.980
for themselves
00:21:06.600
because they feel that the alternatives
00:21:08.560
are not giving them anything
00:21:10.060
that's fundamentally
00:21:10.920
or substantively different.
00:21:13.040
People can debate and talk about
00:21:14.640
whether that's actually the case, of course.
00:21:16.200
People can talk about whether,
00:21:18.500
oh, you know,
00:21:19.000
Aaron O'Toole, Maxine Bernier,
00:21:20.940
Jay Hill,
00:21:22.240
or Justin Trudeau,
00:21:24.360
Jagmeet Singh,
00:21:24.960
all of these people,
00:21:25.600
they can talk about
00:21:26.260
what the differences and similarities are
00:21:28.260
and that's a debate we can have
00:21:29.460
in a free and democratic society.
00:21:32.280
But I'm never going to begrudge anyone
00:21:33.900
for making a decision
00:21:35.000
if they feel they're not getting something
00:21:38.200
from the person
00:21:40.100
who's holding themselves up
00:21:41.280
as an alternative.
00:21:42.780
And my message to Aaron O'Toole,
00:21:44.560
to the conservatives,
00:21:45.240
to any party,
00:21:46.900
to any party seeking votes.
00:21:49.020
Get people to vote for your vision
00:21:51.160
and don't prove that your vision
00:21:54.060
is not something you care
00:21:55.200
all that much about.
00:21:57.460
If you don't care about the firearms file,
00:21:59.520
that's fine.
00:21:59.980
I realize that gun owners
00:22:00.960
are a minority in Canada.
00:22:03.220
But I would look at O'Toole
00:22:04.600
and say, okay,
00:22:05.660
well, you have this platform
00:22:07.900
that you put out three weeks ago,
00:22:09.980
three weeks and two days ago.
00:22:11.160
If you're prepared to roll on this platform,
00:22:14.700
this one particular section of a platform,
00:22:16.740
what else are you prepared to roll on?
00:22:19.520
Are you prepared to roll on this tax cut
00:22:22.260
or this government program?
00:22:23.740
Are you prepared to roll on this?
00:22:25.080
Whatever the case,
00:22:25.600
I'm not even thinking of specific items.
00:22:27.100
I'm just saying that
00:22:27.660
if you're prepared to walk that back,
00:22:29.400
what else in your platform
00:22:30.620
are you prepared to walk back?
00:22:32.240
And I'm not telling you
00:22:35.380
that the flip-flop was justified, unjustified.
00:22:38.060
I'm not telling you
00:22:38.740
it will hurt the conservatives in the polls
00:22:40.620
because you know what?
00:22:41.300
It probably will help them.
00:22:43.960
But the point that I'm making here
00:22:45.840
is that I'm tired of politicians and parties
00:22:48.440
who are unable and or unwilling
00:22:51.280
to actually stand up
00:22:53.060
for the things we know they believe
00:22:55.800
and stand up for the people
00:22:57.640
who are supposed to be behind them
00:22:59.280
and they need to be behind them.
00:23:00.760
I'm kind of tired of politicians looking
00:23:02.500
and saying,
00:23:03.220
no, no, no, just trust us.
00:23:04.380
We just need to get in first
00:23:05.760
and then we can do this.
00:23:07.460
And then the this may never materialize.
00:23:11.340
We've got to take a break
00:23:12.380
when we come back.
00:23:13.240
More of The Andrew Lawton Show
00:23:14.380
here on True North.
00:23:15.400
Stay tuned.
00:23:17.620
You're tuned in to The Andrew Lawton Show.
00:23:21.320
Welcome back to The Andrew Lawton Show.
00:23:23.520
As I've said a few times now,
00:23:25.420
we obviously have given a lot of attention
00:23:27.480
and continue to to the major parties
00:23:29.340
and major themes that come up.
00:23:31.380
But one of the things we do differently
00:23:32.880
is also shining a light
00:23:34.180
on some of the candidates and campaigns
00:23:36.640
that aren't getting as much attention
00:23:38.460
in the mainstream media.
00:23:40.460
And with that prelude,
00:23:41.740
I wanted to bring into the show
00:23:43.180
Rod Taylor,
00:23:44.020
who is the Christian Heritage Party leader
00:23:46.360
and also the party's candidate
00:23:48.320
in Skeena-Bulkley Valley
00:23:50.080
in British Columbia.
00:23:52.260
Rod, it's good to talk to you again.
00:23:53.600
Thanks for coming on today.
00:23:55.380
Yeah, it's great to be on with you.
00:23:56.860
Thanks, Sandra.
00:23:57.520
Now, I think the name slightly gives it away,
00:24:00.220
but I'll still let you describe it
00:24:01.560
in your own words.
00:24:02.860
What is it that the Christian Heritage Party
00:24:04.540
is all about?
00:24:05.740
Our campaign theme is life, family, and freedom.
00:24:08.780
So we support the protection
00:24:10.700
of innocent human life.
00:24:12.400
We support, of course,
00:24:13.700
marriage between one man and one woman,
00:24:16.160
traditional family values,
00:24:17.940
parental rights, that type of thing.
00:24:19.580
And we stand for freedom.
00:24:21.020
And freedom in 2021
00:24:23.080
has become a pretty big issue
00:24:24.800
in terms of, you know,
00:24:26.600
now they're talking about vaccine passports
00:24:28.620
and that type of thing.
00:24:30.060
But freedom of speech,
00:24:31.560
we've seen social media
00:24:33.560
even becoming a place
00:24:36.020
where other opinion is limited.
00:24:38.640
And so we have to stand up for that.
00:24:40.460
The right of parents
00:24:41.780
to counsel their own children,
00:24:43.060
there's a lot of freedoms
00:24:43.780
that are under attack.
00:24:44.900
We saw churches shut down
00:24:46.300
earlier in the year.
00:24:47.200
So freedom has become
00:24:49.260
kind of the front line
00:24:51.160
because if we don't have
00:24:52.840
freedom of speech,
00:24:53.680
we can't defend
00:24:54.560
any of the other human rights.
00:24:56.640
You listed there
00:24:58.200
your top three items,
00:24:59.580
protection for the unborn,
00:25:01.340
restoring a traditional definition
00:25:02.840
of marriage,
00:25:04.080
and freedom.
00:25:05.320
And I'm curious, Rod,
00:25:06.300
how you square number two
00:25:07.680
and number three
00:25:08.540
because the freedom
00:25:09.920
for people to enter
00:25:11.380
into same-sex marriages
00:25:12.480
is not seemingly
00:25:13.740
one of the freedoms
00:25:14.460
you're upholding.
00:25:15.140
How do you juxtapose those two?
00:25:16.860
Well, you know,
00:25:18.380
to us,
00:25:19.120
just marriage is between
00:25:20.200
a man and a woman.
00:25:21.040
It's, you know,
00:25:22.140
we could create, you know,
00:25:23.560
the freedom for a father
00:25:25.760
to kill their children
00:25:26.580
or whatever.
00:25:26.980
We could, you know,
00:25:27.580
talk about that as a freedom.
00:25:31.440
But, you know,
00:25:32.220
there are certain freedoms
00:25:33.580
that are inherent,
00:25:34.520
rights and freedoms
00:25:35.220
that are inherent
00:25:35.940
in human condition
00:25:37.340
given by God.
00:25:38.240
Of course,
00:25:38.660
government doesn't create rights.
00:25:41.220
Human rights,
00:25:42.480
real human rights
00:25:43.440
are given by our creator.
00:25:45.300
And government can either
00:25:46.700
ignore those
00:25:48.340
and violate them
00:25:49.240
or it can honor them
00:25:50.300
and uphold them.
00:25:51.160
So, you know,
00:25:52.720
we just don't see
00:25:53.740
that there is such a thing
00:25:54.760
as the freedom
00:25:55.460
for men and women
00:25:56.540
to, you know,
00:25:58.200
for same-sex marriage.
00:26:00.160
That's, I think,
00:26:01.840
a so-called right
00:26:03.200
that has been created
00:26:04.680
by the left.
00:26:06.020
There's a funny way
00:26:06.940
of putting it,
00:26:07.400
but we don't see
00:26:09.840
that we're violating
00:26:10.420
anything at all.
00:26:11.480
Now, we are not trying
00:26:13.340
to move against people
00:26:15.920
who live a different lifestyle,
00:26:17.500
but we think it's,
00:26:18.700
the government
00:26:19.260
has no business
00:26:20.100
to endorse something
00:26:24.060
and call it marriage
00:26:25.100
that isn't a marriage.
00:26:26.200
That's how we look at that.
00:26:27.940
Now, why is it
00:26:28.840
the government's role,
00:26:30.060
and I say this as a Christian,
00:26:31.360
to endorse a Christian ethic
00:26:33.460
and the government's role
00:26:34.820
to endorse Christian law
00:26:36.660
and basically God's law
00:26:38.000
as opposed to saying
00:26:38.900
that this is a free country,
00:26:40.480
you as an individual
00:26:41.280
have the right
00:26:41.920
to live your life
00:26:42.600
in accordance with Christianity?
00:26:44.000
Why is that an area
00:26:45.240
where you think a government
00:26:46.520
and, by extension,
00:26:47.540
a political party
00:26:48.520
needs to put a,
00:26:50.720
really put this forward?
00:26:52.680
Well, you know,
00:26:53.900
the preamble
00:26:54.360
to the Charter of Rights
00:26:55.120
and Freedoms
00:26:55.620
as Canada is founded
00:26:56.580
on principles
00:26:57.300
that recognize
00:26:57.940
the supremacy of God
00:26:59.040
and the rule of law.
00:27:01.020
And the, yeah,
00:27:02.360
there are certain,
00:27:03.020
you know, Christians,
00:27:03.940
we don't think everyone needs,
00:27:05.240
you know,
00:27:05.580
we're not trying to impose
00:27:07.140
a Christian theology
00:27:08.880
on this nation
00:27:10.000
that everyone needs
00:27:10.920
to go to church
00:27:11.540
or anything like that,
00:27:12.440
but there are certain basics,
00:27:14.080
you know,
00:27:14.900
don't lie,
00:27:15.460
don't steal,
00:27:16.060
don't kill,
00:27:17.500
you know,
00:27:17.700
don't commit adultery.
00:27:18.680
Those are ethics
00:27:20.540
that are shared
00:27:21.260
by pretty well
00:27:22.260
every population group
00:27:24.520
in the country,
00:27:25.400
Christian or non-Christian.
00:27:26.880
And I tell people,
00:27:28.280
even if you are not a Christian,
00:27:29.900
you have a Christian heritage
00:27:31.180
because this nation
00:27:32.720
was founded
00:27:33.280
on Christian principles.
00:27:34.380
and the farther away
00:27:36.540
we depart from that,
00:27:38.040
you know,
00:27:38.360
the tougher it gets
00:27:40.640
for everybody.
00:27:41.460
I mean,
00:27:41.660
we think that the principles
00:27:43.020
of love your neighbor
00:27:43.880
as yourself,
00:27:44.660
do unto others
00:27:45.160
as you'd have them
00:27:45.780
do unto you,
00:27:46.720
that these are principles
00:27:47.680
that would make this country
00:27:48.800
a great place
00:27:49.480
and they don't involve
00:27:50.740
imposing any theological,
00:27:52.320
you know,
00:27:53.320
construct on Canadian citizens.
00:27:56.920
Yeah,
00:27:57.420
and certainly a lot
00:27:58.340
of the values
00:27:59.120
are shared by Jews,
00:28:00.880
they're shared by Muslims,
00:28:01.940
they're shared by Christians,
00:28:02.980
they're even,
00:28:03.560
in many cases,
00:28:04.320
shared by people
00:28:05.060
of no faith at all
00:28:05.960
that just have this moral code
00:28:07.640
that may align with it,
00:28:08.860
but it still is
00:28:09.660
a Christian heritage party
00:28:11.540
and in a country
00:28:12.880
in which it seems like
00:28:14.120
through a combination
00:28:14.880
of immigration
00:28:15.980
and education
00:28:16.880
and lots of other factors,
00:28:18.800
people are moving
00:28:19.420
further and further away
00:28:20.440
from identifying
00:28:21.160
as Christian,
00:28:22.260
how is there,
00:28:23.100
in your view,
00:28:23.800
a place for a Christian
00:28:25.500
first political party
00:28:27.040
or where are you
00:28:27.900
finding that space,
00:28:28.780
I guess,
00:28:29.120
is a better way
00:28:29.780
of putting it?
00:28:30.320
Yeah,
00:28:31.160
well,
00:28:31.980
we sometimes
00:28:33.560
feel like
00:28:34.740
a voice in the wilderness
00:28:35.700
because our society
00:28:37.020
is largely,
00:28:38.080
has largely abandoned
00:28:39.580
not only
00:28:41.220
Christian faith
00:28:42.440
but also
00:28:43.660
Christian principles,
00:28:45.180
Christian values.
00:28:46.680
I mean,
00:28:47.080
even,
00:28:47.720
you know,
00:28:48.520
it's,
00:28:49.180
when we talk about
00:28:49.780
moral values,
00:28:50.500
it's not just sexuality
00:28:51.480
and family things
00:28:52.960
but how you spend
00:28:54.460
taxpayers' money,
00:28:56.320
I mean,
00:28:56.660
that's a moral value
00:28:58.080
that we think
00:28:58.760
the scriptures say
00:29:01.160
don't steal
00:29:02.160
but I think everyone
00:29:03.080
understands that
00:29:03.900
it's wrong to steal
00:29:04.620
what we're actually
00:29:05.280
stealing money
00:29:06.360
from our grandchildren
00:29:07.260
right now
00:29:07.960
or the government
00:29:09.000
is handing out money
00:29:10.980
that it doesn't have
00:29:12.040
but it's going to have
00:29:13.080
to be repaid
00:29:13.820
by our grandchildren,
00:29:15.120
great-grandchildren.
00:29:17.060
Christian values,
00:29:18.180
I think,
00:29:18.900
just supersede
00:29:20.440
basically any theological
00:29:22.140
construct.
00:29:24.700
Again,
00:29:24.960
as I mentioned,
00:29:25.900
we think that
00:29:27.920
loving your neighbor
00:29:29.320
as yourself
00:29:29.840
would be good
00:29:30.540
for every Canadian
00:29:31.620
and the government
00:29:33.220
of course
00:29:33.660
can't force people
00:29:34.580
to be good
00:29:35.580
but the government
00:29:36.300
can set a pattern
00:29:37.860
and put forward
00:29:39.880
principles that align
00:29:41.580
with,
00:29:42.200
you know,
00:29:43.160
biblical principles
00:29:43.900
and certainly align
00:29:44.760
with our Charter
00:29:45.380
of Rights and Freedoms.
00:29:47.020
Now,
00:29:47.620
looking at your platform,
00:29:49.040
I know you have
00:29:49.460
a couple of items here
00:29:50.440
like wanting to
00:29:51.220
balance the budget,
00:29:52.380
enforce border protection,
00:29:54.160
eliminate carbon taxes
00:29:55.440
and in the interest
00:29:56.520
of disclosure,
00:29:57.260
I agree with all three.
00:29:58.300
So all three of those
00:29:59.120
are wins for me
00:30:00.360
but I'm just curious
00:30:01.960
where the Christian basis
00:30:04.280
is of that
00:30:04.840
because these are not
00:30:05.760
things that people
00:30:06.940
would inherently associate
00:30:07.960
with religion.
00:30:09.400
They're, I think,
00:30:10.120
good policies
00:30:10.740
but I'm just curious
00:30:11.740
where you've decided
00:30:13.380
as the leader
00:30:13.900
of the Christian Heritage Party
00:30:15.180
to approach these issues from.
00:30:16.580
Well,
00:30:17.700
the carbon tax
00:30:18.740
I think is a matter
00:30:19.480
of following science
00:30:21.120
and, you know,
00:30:22.480
just following the truth.
00:30:24.600
You know,
00:30:24.780
a lot of people
00:30:26.000
have fallen
00:30:26.500
into a political correctness
00:30:27.960
and now it's,
00:30:29.640
you know,
00:30:29.900
many people think
00:30:30.680
if you're,
00:30:31.620
you know,
00:30:31.920
don't agree
00:30:32.900
with the theory
00:30:34.220
that carbon dioxide
00:30:35.660
is ruining the planet
00:30:38.060
that there's something
00:30:40.240
wrong with you
00:30:40.840
and we think
00:30:41.560
we just stand up
00:30:42.220
for the truth
00:30:42.720
and that goes along
00:30:43.600
with, you know,
00:30:44.400
the vaccine mandates
00:30:45.540
and that type of thing
00:30:46.420
as well.
00:30:48.420
I guess
00:30:49.200
maybe the backside
00:30:51.160
of that is
00:30:51.780
some people have accused us
00:30:52.960
of being,
00:30:53.500
you know,
00:30:53.780
a one-issue party
00:30:54.680
because we are,
00:30:55.800
you know,
00:30:56.280
the only pro-life party
00:30:57.420
at this point in time
00:30:58.240
in Canada
00:30:59.280
actually standing up
00:31:00.440
for the protection
00:31:01.160
of innocent human life
00:31:02.140
in the womb
00:31:02.580
and we say,
00:31:04.520
no,
00:31:04.680
we're not a one-issue party
00:31:06.420
but abortion
00:31:07.760
is a one-party issue.
00:31:09.360
We're the only ones
00:31:10.520
willing to talk about it
00:31:11.640
but these other issues,
00:31:13.540
I mean,
00:31:13.800
you can't be
00:31:14.360
a national political party
00:31:15.520
without addressing
00:31:16.660
all the issues
00:31:18.240
that are on the table there.
00:31:19.600
I mean,
00:31:20.040
and I think
00:31:20.940
people would rightly
00:31:22.260
reject us
00:31:22.920
if we would only talk
00:31:23.960
about abortion
00:31:24.680
or euthanasia
00:31:25.620
or marriage.
00:31:26.640
We do have
00:31:27.600
a fairly broad
00:31:29.100
platform.
00:31:30.420
We're working on it
00:31:31.020
all the time
00:31:31.460
to make it better
00:31:32.160
but,
00:31:32.580
you know,
00:31:34.380
we take stands
00:31:35.420
on things
00:31:36.100
and I guess
00:31:37.300
other people,
00:31:38.480
maybe sometimes
00:31:39.200
even Christians
00:31:39.800
might disagree
00:31:40.400
with us on things
00:31:41.160
and I have told
00:31:42.120
my candidates,
00:31:43.360
the other candidates
00:31:44.140
that are running
00:31:44.660
in this election.
00:31:45.880
I mean,
00:31:46.580
on life,
00:31:48.100
family,
00:31:48.560
and freedom,
00:31:49.860
we're united.
00:31:51.040
If someone has
00:31:51.880
a different opinion
00:31:52.680
about,
00:31:53.360
you know,
00:31:54.780
supply management
00:31:56.480
or about,
00:31:57.540
you know,
00:31:58.020
how to handle
00:31:58.660
the border crisis,
00:31:59.940
I mean,
00:32:00.280
they're allowed
00:32:00.760
to express that.
00:32:02.720
We're not going
00:32:03.620
to be 100%,
00:32:04.800
we're not carbon copy
00:32:06.420
images of each other,
00:32:07.820
right,
00:32:08.140
cookie cutter images,
00:32:09.820
but we are
00:32:11.360
unique individuals
00:32:12.220
and we come
00:32:12.680
to conclusions
00:32:13.460
based on our
00:32:14.400
own personality
00:32:15.480
but if they're
00:32:16.840
not,
00:32:17.220
you know,
00:32:17.480
supportive of
00:32:18.080
the protection
00:32:18.460
of innocent human
00:32:19.000
life,
00:32:19.380
well,
00:32:19.600
they really
00:32:19.920
probably would
00:32:20.500
be in the wrong
00:32:21.040
party,
00:32:21.440
right?
00:32:21.700
So that's how
00:32:22.860
we sort of
00:32:23.320
divide that up
00:32:23.960
but we hope
00:32:24.980
to have
00:32:25.420
a broad discussion.
00:32:26.780
We are actually,
00:32:27.380
we are going
00:32:28.620
to have a convention
00:32:29.600
next week,
00:32:30.320
the last week
00:32:30.840
of the campaign,
00:32:32.180
a pre-planned
00:32:33.540
convention,
00:32:34.560
our triennial
00:32:35.100
policy convention
00:32:36.160
in Calgary,
00:32:36.860
so I'll be
00:32:38.460
down there
00:32:39.220
for the
00:32:39.840
last week
00:32:41.240
of this campaign
00:32:41.980
but then
00:32:43.080
back home
00:32:43.620
in time
00:32:43.920
for voting day.
00:32:45.560
One of the
00:32:46.260
interesting things
00:32:47.140
I will say
00:32:47.940
is that in
00:32:48.480
Conservative Party
00:32:49.500
of Canada
00:32:50.080
politics,
00:32:51.260
it's very
00:32:51.960
difficult,
00:32:52.640
not impossible,
00:32:53.380
but difficult
00:32:53.820
to be elected
00:32:54.440
as a leader
00:32:55.000
without being
00:32:55.620
pro-life
00:32:56.240
or without
00:32:56.900
in some way
00:32:57.540
appealing
00:32:58.080
to social
00:32:59.080
conservatives.
00:32:59.820
We've seen
00:33:00.220
this with
00:33:00.560
Erin O'Toole,
00:33:01.260
we saw it
00:33:01.660
with Andrew Scheer,
00:33:02.620
we saw it
00:33:03.100
with Stephen Harper
00:33:03.840
because social
00:33:04.520
conservatives
00:33:05.020
make up
00:33:05.440
such a huge
00:33:05.920
portion
00:33:06.320
of the
00:33:07.100
Conservative Party's
00:33:08.000
base.
00:33:08.360
You need
00:33:08.820
their support
00:33:09.340
at least
00:33:09.720
in some
00:33:10.460
way.
00:33:11.140
So you are
00:33:11.900
I think
00:33:12.200
right to
00:33:12.700
point out
00:33:13.240
here that
00:33:13.680
there is
00:33:14.080
an appetite
00:33:14.860
for a
00:33:15.420
party that's
00:33:15.880
going to
00:33:16.060
take a
00:33:16.360
stand for
00:33:16.740
that,
00:33:17.220
but as
00:33:17.540
we so
00:33:17.840
often see
00:33:18.480
the Conservative
00:33:19.080
Party of
00:33:19.520
Canada
00:33:19.840
sometimes runs
00:33:21.200
away from
00:33:21.660
that once we
00:33:22.220
get into
00:33:22.600
a general
00:33:23.280
election campaign
00:33:24.180
which is
00:33:24.620
where we've
00:33:25.060
been in the
00:33:25.640
last couple
00:33:26.080
of weeks
00:33:26.400
on the
00:33:26.680
issue.
00:33:27.760
Right,
00:33:28.100
yeah,
00:33:28.580
and of
00:33:29.260
course
00:33:29.440
Erin O'Toole,
00:33:30.680
the current
00:33:31.260
leader of the
00:33:31.740
Conservative Party
00:33:32.380
was crystal
00:33:33.040
clear when
00:33:33.700
during their
00:33:35.420
campaign,
00:33:35.980
he wanted
00:33:37.380
to give the
00:33:37.800
impression that
00:33:38.400
he would
00:33:38.720
allow and
00:33:39.920
work with
00:33:41.300
social
00:33:41.640
Conservatives,
00:33:42.380
but he
00:33:43.040
said,
00:33:43.380
I'm pro-choice,
00:33:44.200
I'm supportive
00:33:45.560
of what they
00:33:47.000
call a woman's
00:33:47.640
right to
00:33:47.960
choose.
00:33:48.340
I don't like
00:33:49.100
that phrase,
00:33:49.820
but that's
00:33:50.900
the kind of
00:33:51.840
phraseology they
00:33:52.660
use.
00:33:53.120
and he voted
00:33:55.180
against Kathy
00:33:56.700
Wagenthal's
00:33:57.560
sex-selective
00:33:58.440
abortion bill,
00:33:59.220
C-233.
00:34:00.700
I mean,
00:34:00.980
so his
00:34:01.420
position is
00:34:02.500
not unknown.
00:34:03.120
I'm actually
00:34:03.500
surprised that
00:34:05.040
anyone,
00:34:05.900
I'm surprised
00:34:06.580
that anyone
00:34:07.000
is surprised
00:34:07.840
that he is
00:34:08.800
not supporting
00:34:09.800
pro-life
00:34:10.940
activities.
00:34:12.800
And even
00:34:13.060
you go back
00:34:13.480
to Stephen
00:34:13.880
Harper,
00:34:14.400
who I think
00:34:15.120
was,
00:34:16.380
well,
00:34:16.860
I like
00:34:17.400
Stephen Harper
00:34:17.860
in many ways,
00:34:18.500
but he
00:34:20.120
personally,
00:34:21.560
and with his
00:34:22.440
inner core
00:34:23.140
of the
00:34:24.740
party,
00:34:25.620
resisted
00:34:26.500
four different
00:34:27.440
efforts by
00:34:28.380
his own
00:34:29.120
backbenchers
00:34:29.900
to bring
00:34:30.260
forward pro-life
00:34:31.020
legislation.
00:34:32.940
So I think
00:34:34.000
people who
00:34:34.760
think that
00:34:35.880
the Conservative
00:34:36.700
Party is
00:34:37.320
somehow going
00:34:37.840
to come
00:34:38.100
through in
00:34:38.440
the end
00:34:38.740
and do
00:34:39.040
something
00:34:39.460
pro-life
00:34:40.420
are mistaken.
00:34:42.040
And the
00:34:42.380
idea that,
00:34:43.180
well,
00:34:43.440
I'm just
00:34:43.860
writing a
00:34:44.360
communique on
00:34:44.980
it now
00:34:45.260
about the
00:34:45.720
big blue
00:34:46.080
tent.
00:34:47.000
It's
00:34:47.560
bigger,
00:34:48.500
but are
00:34:50.200
there any
00:34:50.560
tent pegs
00:34:51.140
holding it
00:34:51.560
down?
00:34:51.940
That's
00:34:52.140
kind of,
00:34:52.640
you know,
00:34:52.880
where are
00:34:53.600
the anchors
00:34:54.180
for moral
00:34:55.460
values,
00:34:56.080
right?
00:34:56.400
So with
00:34:57.700
him,
00:34:58.600
of course,
00:34:59.600
now we
00:34:59.940
see there's
00:35:00.360
going to
00:35:00.560
be,
00:35:01.300
he's going
00:35:01.840
to get
00:35:02.060
rid of
00:35:02.340
Trudeau's
00:35:02.840
carbon tax
00:35:03.460
if he
00:35:03.720
has the
00:35:04.020
opportunity,
00:35:04.520
but he's
00:35:05.040
going to
00:35:05.220
introduce
00:35:05.540
his own,
00:35:06.200
right?
00:35:07.500
That type
00:35:08.360
of thing.
00:35:08.820
He doesn't
00:35:09.880
like the
00:35:10.380
concept of
00:35:11.680
vaccine
00:35:12.580
passports,
00:35:14.040
but he's
00:35:15.380
going to
00:35:15.960
have some
00:35:17.640
national
00:35:18.040
system
00:35:18.440
for tracking
00:35:19.000
vaccination
00:35:19.720
and alternatives
00:35:20.660
and whatever.
00:35:21.240
So I think
00:35:22.580
he's trying
00:35:23.020
to, you
00:35:24.040
know,
00:35:24.700
stay close
00:35:25.340
to the
00:35:25.620
middle line,
00:35:26.180
but unfortunately
00:35:26.860
that's where
00:35:28.920
there's a lot
00:35:29.400
of road
00:35:29.660
killing along
00:35:30.320
the middle
00:35:30.620
line.
00:35:31.020
You know,
00:35:31.180
you can't
00:35:32.040
please everybody
00:35:32.720
and if you're
00:35:33.280
trying to
00:35:33.800
please everybody,
00:35:34.320
I think you're
00:35:34.900
going to
00:35:35.040
actually end
00:35:35.560
up pleasing
00:35:35.960
nobody.
00:35:36.380
I know this
00:35:38.000
is one of
00:35:38.340
the most
00:35:38.620
frustrating
00:35:39.200
questions that
00:35:40.300
a leader of
00:35:41.320
a party can
00:35:41.940
get, but I
00:35:42.600
do have to
00:35:43.280
ask, so I
00:35:43.800
hope you'll
00:35:44.100
indulge me on
00:35:44.700
this, vote
00:35:45.480
splitting.
00:35:46.060
It sounds like
00:35:46.900
with the issues
00:35:47.400
that you're
00:35:47.700
taking on, a
00:35:48.460
lot of the
00:35:48.980
votes that
00:35:49.780
you're seeking
00:35:50.360
are going to
00:35:50.940
be with voters
00:35:51.720
that probably
00:35:52.760
would otherwise
00:35:53.500
vote conservative
00:35:54.260
for some other
00:35:55.880
right of center
00:35:56.580
option.
00:35:57.320
And whenever
00:35:57.740
this comes up,
00:35:58.480
the question
00:35:58.820
people are
00:35:59.300
confronted with
00:36:00.000
is, well,
00:36:00.740
is this just
00:36:01.540
eventually leading
00:36:02.340
to more
00:36:03.340
Trudeau
00:36:03.960
elections, more
00:36:04.720
Trudeau
00:36:05.040
victories?
00:36:05.700
How do you
00:36:06.500
square that?
00:36:07.760
Well, there's a
00:36:08.180
few different
00:36:08.600
answers for that.
00:36:09.380
One is, if you
00:36:10.820
don't want to
00:36:11.280
split the vote,
00:36:12.880
I mean, North
00:36:14.380
Korea and China
00:36:15.280
and Cuba are
00:36:15.900
places where you
00:36:16.460
don't really split
00:36:17.040
the vote because
00:36:17.680
you only have
00:36:18.280
one choice,
00:36:18.820
right?
00:36:20.080
Our system is
00:36:21.480
designed, whether
00:36:22.580
it's a perfect
00:36:23.120
system or not,
00:36:23.900
it is designed
00:36:24.740
to split the
00:36:25.540
vote.
00:36:25.780
People are, if
00:36:26.880
people actually
00:36:27.540
voted for what
00:36:28.200
they wanted instead
00:36:29.220
of voting against
00:36:30.500
what they don't
00:36:31.240
want, or
00:36:32.320
or pragmatically
00:36:33.160
thinking, well,
00:36:34.100
my neighbor's
00:36:34.880
probably going to
00:36:35.380
vote this way,
00:36:35.980
so I better
00:36:36.380
vote that way,
00:36:37.960
right?
00:36:38.220
Or whatever.
00:36:39.720
I think we
00:36:40.540
would have a
00:36:40.980
lot closer
00:36:41.620
representation of
00:36:42.700
the views of
00:36:43.280
Canadians in
00:36:44.020
Parliament today.
00:36:44.920
But people have
00:36:45.740
tended to base
00:36:47.440
their voting
00:36:49.460
habits, they
00:36:50.960
vote out of
00:36:51.440
fear instead of
00:36:52.280
out of hope,
00:36:53.020
I guess.
00:36:54.200
And, you
00:36:55.780
know, so
00:36:56.540
vote splitting,
00:36:57.760
I think if
00:36:58.280
people voted
00:36:59.240
for what they
00:36:59.800
wanted, we
00:37:01.000
would actually
00:37:01.480
have a better
00:37:01.980
idea of what
00:37:02.580
Canadians want.
00:37:04.740
You know, I
00:37:05.160
think there's
00:37:05.600
many more
00:37:06.040
people, I've
00:37:06.740
been told many
00:37:07.520
times, people
00:37:07.960
would, oh, I'd
00:37:08.540
love to vote for
00:37:09.140
you, but I
00:37:09.720
don't want to
00:37:10.220
split the vote.
00:37:11.040
Well, in my
00:37:11.540
writing, Skeena
00:37:12.240
Bulkley Valley,
00:37:13.660
the Conservatives
00:37:14.400
have lost in the
00:37:15.280
last six
00:37:16.260
elections.
00:37:17.240
So the idea
00:37:18.500
that they're
00:37:18.940
going to get
00:37:20.040
rid of our
00:37:20.420
NDP member by
00:37:21.620
voting for a
00:37:22.380
Conservative who's
00:37:23.040
going to lose,
00:37:24.160
and somehow that's
00:37:25.020
going to take
00:37:26.260
power away from
00:37:27.140
Justin Trudeau's
00:37:28.000
Liberals, it's
00:37:29.660
just not logical,
00:37:30.420
but people think
00:37:31.180
that way.
00:37:32.100
We ask people to
00:37:33.280
just vote for
00:37:34.120
what they believe
00:37:34.940
in, and if
00:37:35.960
they did that,
00:37:37.460
our numbers would
00:37:38.500
be much higher
00:37:39.120
than they are,
00:37:40.220
and that would
00:37:40.660
give people hope,
00:37:41.520
right?
00:37:42.700
Christian Heritage
00:37:43.480
Party leader Rod
00:37:44.680
Taylor joining me
00:37:45.420
now.
00:37:45.660
Rod, thanks so
00:37:46.200
much for your
00:37:46.500
time today, good
00:37:47.040
to speak with
00:37:47.440
you.
00:37:48.060
Thank you,
00:37:48.700
Andrew, really a
00:37:49.440
pleasure being with
00:37:50.100
you, and all the
00:37:51.000
best during the rest
00:37:51.940
of this election and
00:37:52.660
on through.
00:37:53.600
Take care.
00:37:54.480
Thank you, God
00:37:55.080
bless you.
00:37:55.900
Yeah, take care.
00:37:56.780
That was Christian
00:37:58.640
Heritage Party leader
00:37:59.920
Rod Taylor.
00:38:00.920
As I said in the
00:38:01.820
lead-up to that
00:38:02.380
segment, we are here
00:38:03.420
at True North going
00:38:04.140
to pay attention to a
00:38:05.560
lot of the candidates
00:38:06.240
and parties that the
00:38:07.180
mainstream media is
00:38:08.100
not paying attention
00:38:08.980
to, not just because
00:38:10.400
they're not paying
00:38:10.960
attention to them, but
00:38:11.780
because a lot of
00:38:12.440
these people still have
00:38:13.700
something to say, and
00:38:14.580
even if you agree or
00:38:15.740
disagree with it, it
00:38:16.580
doesn't really matter.
00:38:17.820
They're a part of this
00:38:18.560
country and a part of
00:38:19.640
this process, and we've
00:38:20.800
actually gotten a lot
00:38:21.480
of requests from our
00:38:23.120
viewers to have an
00:38:24.580
interview with Rod
00:38:25.480
Taylor, so glad we
00:38:26.300
could accommodate
00:38:26.800
him in the midst of
00:38:28.380
the writ period here.
00:38:29.680
And I'm actually going
00:38:30.440
to be later this week
00:38:32.160
on the road with
00:38:33.260
Maxime Bernier covering
00:38:34.680
the PPC campaign.
00:38:36.380
I spent a few days
00:38:37.260
with the Conservative
00:38:38.120
Party last weekend, or
00:38:39.640
I guess about a week
00:38:40.520
and a week and a few
00:38:41.360
days.
00:38:41.680
Time stands still for
00:38:42.860
me in elections, so
00:38:43.820
it's everything was
00:38:44.740
simultaneously like
00:38:45.900
yesterday and three
00:38:47.240
years ago, but we
00:38:48.920
covered the
00:38:49.440
Conservatives.
00:38:50.260
We're also going to
00:38:51.340
be out West, actually
00:38:52.460
covering the PPC and
00:38:53.680
the Mavericks as well.
00:38:54.760
So lots of time left
00:38:56.200
in the campaign to
00:38:57.080
get things done here.
00:38:58.220
I want to thank all
00:38:58.800
of you who have sent
00:38:59.780
me tips and feedback
00:39:01.060
and all of this other
00:39:02.360
sort of stuff.
00:39:02.940
If you want to, my
00:39:03.820
email address is
00:39:04.820
andrew at
00:39:05.580
truenorthcanada.com.
00:39:07.900
We will wrap things
00:39:09.060
up here.
00:39:09.580
Enjoy the debates.
00:39:10.540
True North's live
00:39:11.480
debate show is
00:39:12.220
tomorrow, Thursday,
00:39:13.380
starting at 8pm
00:39:14.240
Eastern, and I'll be
00:39:15.440
on location from the
00:39:16.660
debate site in
00:39:17.580
Gatineau, Quebec.
00:39:18.800
We'll talk to you
00:39:19.340
soon, folks.
00:39:19.960
Thank you, God bless,
00:39:20.960
and good day to
00:39:21.600
you all.
00:39:22.380
Thanks for listening
00:39:23.020
to the Andrew
00:39:23.640
Lawton Show.
00:39:24.460
Support the program
00:39:25.280
by donating to
00:39:26.080
Truenorth at
00:39:26.780
www.tnc.news.
00:39:29.700
We'll be right back.
Link copied!