Juno News - Danielle Smith drops BOMBSHELL on Canada, outlines pathway to independence in 2026

00:00:00.000 Hi, I'm Candice Malcolm, and this is The Candice Malcolm Show. We have a fantastic episode for you folks. You're going to want to stick around. So yesterday afternoon, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith gave a absolutely stunning press conference that I believe will change the future of Canada, no matter what happens. It was that powerful. The best speech that I've ever seen Premier Smith deliver unbelievable content. And I think that this will make Canada a stronger country.

00:00:29.460 And it will make Alberta stronger and more prosperous the way that it should have been from the beginning, to be perfectly frank. So we're going to get to all of that. And later in the show, we're going to talk about an embarrassing report by the CBC. All right, folks, do me a favor. Hit that like button. Help us with the YouTube algorithm. Help us be discovered by more and more Canadians. Thank you so much.

00:00:49.760 Okay, so yesterday, like I said, Premier Smith announces some changes. She commits to potentially even a referendum and lays out the path for a future free Alberta. So I want to just go through this here. First, she talks about something called the Alberta Accord. This is a new arrangement, a new agreement with the with the feds with Ottawa that will, like I said, just make things fair. So let's play that clip of Premier Smith talking about the Alberta Accord.

00:01:17.760 While I will in good faith work with Prime Minister Mark Carney on unwinding the mountain of destructive legislation and policies that have ravaged our provincial and national economies this past decade, until I see tangible proof of real change, Alberta will be taking steps to better protect ourselves from Ottawa.

00:01:36.580 I will soon appoint a special negotiating team to represent our province in negotiations with the federal government on the following reforms requested by our province. We hope this will result in a binding agreement that Albertans can have confidence in. Call it an Alberta Accord, if you will.

00:01:53.600 Okay, so the Alberta Accord includes four parts. The first one is that Alberta requires a guaranteed corridor and port access to tidewater off the Pacific, Arctic and Atlantic coasts, all three, and for international export of Alberta, oil, gas, critical minerals and other resources in amount supported by the free market, rather than dictated by Ottawa.

00:02:15.600 Ottawa. Next. Second, it demands that the federal government must end all federal interference in the development of provincial resources by repealing the No New Pipelines Law Bill C-69, the oil tanker ban, the net zero electricity regulations, the oil and gas emissions cap, the net zero vehicle mandate, and any federal law regulation that purports to regulate industrial carbon emissions, plastics, or the commercial free speech of energy companies.

00:02:43.340 Number three, that the federal government must refrain from imposing export taxes or restrictions on the export of Alberta resources without the consent of the government of Alberta.

00:02:53.380 And fourth, finally, the federal government must provide to Alberta the same per capita federal transfers and equalization as is received by the other three largest provinces, Quebec, Ontario, and British Columbia.

00:03:05.320 This is absolutely right, folks. The whole idea behind equalization, even if you're someone like me who has been a critic of the program for a very, very long time,

00:03:12.900 it is not a fair program. The basic idea is that the smaller provinces should have a similar standard of life as the bigger, wealthier provinces, right?

00:03:20.560 So the idea is that, sure, rich provinces like Alberta can transfer some money over to Prince Edward Island so that people in PEI can have similar health care and education.

00:03:29.420 You could argue that there's some rationale behind it. I don't like the idea of transferring money from taxpayers to the French country.

00:03:34.940 Fine. But the idea is not so that rich resource development provinces like Alberta can subsidize communism and socialism in places like Ontario, Quebec, and British Columbia.

00:03:45.960 That is not part of the deal. So good on Danielle Smith for saying no to that. 1.00

00:03:50.960 Okay, we've got our next clip here, which is that Danielle Smith, Premier Danielle Smith, announced that she will chair something called the Alberta Next panel, made up of judicial, economic, and academic leaders to explore Alberta's future in Canada.

00:04:06.020 Let's play that clip.

00:04:07.300 While these negotiations with Ottawa are ongoing, our government will appoint, and I will chair, the Alberta Next panel.

00:04:13.620 This panel will be composed of some of our best and brightest judicial, academic, and economic minds to join with me in a series of in-person and online town halls to discuss Alberta's future in Canada, and specifically, what next steps we can take as a province to better protect Alberta from any current or future hostile policies of the federal government.

00:04:35.020 After the work of the panel is finished, it is likely we will place some of the more popular ideas discussed with the panel to a provincial referendum so that all Albertans can vote on them sometime in 2026.

00:04:47.960 So the idea is that they are going to come up with best ideas for the future of Alberta and have a referendum in 2026 about whether the Albertans, people of the province of Alberta, want to follow different directions.

00:04:59.520 She specifically said that the idea of this referendum was not to have a vote for separation.

00:05:06.140 However, if there is a citizens' initiative and a petition that meets the threshold of the Citizens' Initiative Act, that she will respect the democratic will of the people, and there will include a referendum for separation on that ballot.

00:05:20.140 Let's play that clip.

00:05:21.220 To be clear from the outset, our government will not be putting a vote on separation from Canada on the referendum ballot.

00:05:27.920 However, if there is a successful citizen-led referendum petition that is able to gather the requisite number of signatures requesting such a question to be put on a referendum, our government will respect the democratic process and include that question on the 2026 provincial referendum ballot as well.

00:05:48.140 So there you have it, folks.

00:05:50.140 That is the line drawn in the sand by Premier Danielle Smith on the future in Canada.

00:05:56.520 I think it's spectacular.

00:05:57.580 It's very strong from Premier Smith.

00:05:59.100 I'll just read one more thing that she wrote on X.

00:06:01.540 She said,

00:06:01.900 Wow, pretty incredible stuff happening out of Alberta.

00:06:27.540 And to talk about it and help us understand the context from someone in Alberta, pleased today to be joined by Corey Morgan.

00:06:33.940 Corey is a senior columnist and host with the Western Standard.

00:06:37.060 He co-founded the Alberta Independence Party all the way back in 2000, and he was a founding member of the Wildrose Party.

00:06:43.580 Remember that Danielle Smith went on to become the leader of the Wildrose Party.

00:06:47.100 OK, Corey, so just tell us, what did you think of Premier Smith's address yesterday?

00:06:50.520 And what do you think about these new changes to create either a stronger Alberta or perhaps a pathway to independence?

00:06:57.360 So, I mean, Danielle's release was brilliant.

00:07:00.480 I mean, it's the most aggressive defense of Albertan rights that we've seen from a Premier, I believe, since Peter Lougheed.

00:07:07.900 I think Albertans are going to be a bit leery, though.

00:07:09.940 We've heard this before.

00:07:10.920 We had the Alberta agenda 25 years ago that Stephen Harper brought in.

00:07:14.580 We had Jason Kenney do the Fair Deal panel.

00:07:17.340 And now we've got another panel.

00:07:18.600 I mean, the difference with Smith this time, though, is she's definitely inserted a big or else at the end of it.

00:07:24.380 She's saying, you know, these are the demands.

00:07:25.760 We kind of already know what they are.

00:07:27.120 We've been over this ground for decades.

00:07:28.960 But she's going to reestablish it with this Alberta Accord and then add some teeth to it, potentially, with giving the ability to hold an independence referendum 0.53

00:07:39.900 or enshrining the conclusions, at least of the other things aside for independence, in a referendum to show Albertans really, really do support these means for provincial autonomy through a referenda.

00:07:51.820 And it's going to make it difficult for the government to ignore.

00:07:53.980 But her demands as well.

00:07:55.500 I can't.

00:07:55.840 She must know that the prime minister is not going to see to those.

00:07:59.820 So they're not going to get rid of their legislation that blocks resource development in the West.

00:08:04.980 They're not going to take on Quebec and allow a utility corridor with a pipeline to go through it.

00:08:10.280 So I guess it kind of puts the ball in Kearney's court.

00:08:12.800 It'll be interesting to see how we react.

00:08:14.340 OK, so, Corey, I totally agree that there are irreconcilable differences, it seems, between the federal liberal government and the United Conservative government in Alberta.

00:08:25.320 I'm wondering, though, like the timeline of a referendum or at least a vote that could include a separatist referendum in 2026.

00:08:32.800 Do you think that's fast enough?

00:08:34.060 I mean, I'm just wondering on the ground in Calgary and Alberta.

00:08:37.500 Seems to me that the moment the election was settled, people wanted to talk about independence.

00:08:40.980 They want to talk about separation immediately, and it seems like there is a bigger appetite than ever.

00:08:45.920 So can you sort of just describe what the sentiment is like in Alberta right now?

00:08:50.380 Yeah, the sentiment's red hot in Alberta, and Albertans are frustrated.

00:08:53.460 I mean, 10 years of abuse from a liberal government, and then it appears if you just chop the head off and replace it with somebody else,

00:08:59.280 that central Canada was more than happy to give them another round at us.

00:09:02.540 But at the same time, as support for independence, if you're talking 30 percent, 40 percent, which is pretty strong,

00:09:09.120 and you're record high when you're getting a third or more of Albertans who are ready to go,

00:09:13.260 people should be sitting up and paying attention.

00:09:15.480 But that's still a good ways from 50 percent.

00:09:17.880 And if we held a referendum next week, we would lose.

00:09:20.600 There's no organization for campaigning or making the case.

00:09:25.220 So I think 2026, perhaps we're getting a little more realistic.

00:09:28.460 I mean, I know that some of the rage will cool down.

00:09:30.440 I don't know necessarily.

00:09:31.300 I mean, if the liberals carry on as they had in the last 10 years, the rage is only going to boil stronger,

00:09:36.300 and it allows Albertans more time to clarify than what they want to do and really make that strong decision

00:09:43.420 if and when an independence referendum comes.

00:09:46.240 That's the show.

00:09:46.700 It was very smart.

00:09:47.500 She put it in the hands of Albertans.

00:09:48.920 It's not going to be Premier Smith who invokes a referendum on independence.

00:09:52.300 It'll have to be Albertans petitioning it.

00:09:54.140 And she made the legislation more realistic so that the bar could be achieved if Albertans choose to do so.

00:10:00.060 So there's probably a pretty good likelihood we're going to see that referendum in 2026.

00:10:04.820 And I do believe Albertans need that much time, though, to really chew on that issue, on such an important referendum.

00:10:10.840 Well, it's interesting that you say that, yes, the bar was lowered to trigger a referendum,

00:10:15.440 but not to actually get to independence.

00:10:18.220 Like, they still need to have a clear majority, whatever that means.

00:10:22.120 Maybe you can shed some light for the viewers about the Clarity Act

00:10:25.980 and how, interestingly, Quebec separatism and that movement in the 90s and a Supreme Court hearing case,

00:10:32.200 I think it was in 1998, actually, like, led the path that could potentially lead to Alberta separating.

00:10:38.080 It did chart the course.

00:10:39.520 And there's a lot of debate.

00:10:40.740 Quebec came within 1% of separating in a referendum in 1995.

00:10:44.920 And people realized how serious it was.

00:10:47.960 You can't dismiss these things.

00:10:49.640 But part of the issues with that was it was a very odd question.

00:10:52.700 I think everybody knew it was a yes or no question,

00:10:54.660 but it was phrased very awkwardly and oddly, and some could say deceptively.

00:10:58.860 So they got a court ruling on how these would be held for the sake of clarity.

00:11:02.720 And it has to be a clear question about whether one's in or out.

00:11:06.080 And if a province, though, it also ruled, and that votes with a majority on a clear question,

00:11:11.560 the rest of the country is obligated to begin negotiating the independence of that province in good faith.

00:11:17.940 So it sets about the path.

00:11:19.700 It sets about the rules as well as to what would have to occur in order for a province to consider independence,

00:11:27.600 which isn't necessarily easy.

00:11:29.300 But now there is a path.

00:11:30.260 They can't deny that a province has the right to do such a thing.

00:11:33.160 They certainly didn't have the courage to tell Quebec they don't have the right to do so.

00:11:37.240 Alberta has that same right, as does Saskatchewan or British Columbia.

00:11:40.500 So following the rules of the Clarity Act, a province can conceivably vote to go.

00:11:45.260 Super interesting.

00:11:46.600 Corey Morgan from Western Standard, we really appreciate your time and your insights today.

00:11:50.820 Thank you for joining the show.

00:11:52.600 Thank you.

00:11:53.240 I appreciate being able to come on.

00:11:54.580 All right, folks.

00:11:55.260 So while Premier Smith is doing incredibly important and powerful things in Alberta,

00:11:59.920 Canada's state broadcaster is doing what they do.

00:12:02.540 They sink even lower and lower. 0.99

00:12:04.320 And yesterday they put out a ridiculous, pathetic, attempted hit job against Premier Smith. 0.99

00:12:10.740 And this was just totally fell flat. 0.99

00:12:13.340 OK, so here is the report.

00:12:15.140 The idea is that they, I guess, put in an access to information or freedom of information request

00:12:19.820 and found out that Premier Smith's trip to Mar-a-Lago earlier this year to visit President Trump

00:12:25.880 cost taxpayers about $10,000.

00:12:29.660 That's the bombshell.

00:12:30.700 $10,000 for Premier Smith's visit.

00:12:33.660 And they try to drum this up into a huge controversy, like how dare she waste this money 1.00

00:12:39.540 and put on the whole...

00:12:41.880 And this is fake news to a T.

00:12:43.660 This is why the CBC has no credibility.

00:12:45.940 This is why it needs to be defunded.

00:12:47.280 This is one of the worst reports that I have seen.

00:12:49.460 Just total fake news, trying to create a scandal where there is none, trying to just pick on

00:12:54.900 one politician because they don't like her, because she's just too conservative for the 1.00

00:12:58.620 CBC or whatever.

00:12:59.860 And it just completely backfires.

00:13:01.920 So let's play this clip.

00:13:03.160 And I will walk you through just how terrible it is, in case it wasn't obvious enough to

00:13:06.740 you for just watching it. 0.93

00:13:07.900 But I'll point out the extra obnoxious, ridiculous parts of it. 0.90

00:13:11.440 Let's play this CBC report. 0.63

00:13:13.480 Well, as Canada's Prime Minister prepares for his meeting with Donald Trump, we're learning

00:13:18.660 more today about a meeting in early January between Alberta's Premier, Daniel Smith, and

00:13:23.800 Trump.

00:13:24.340 Who went and how much did it cost?

00:13:26.840 We know it took place at Trump's residence in Palm Beach, Florida.

00:13:30.600 And as Julia Wong tells us, some critics are raising questions about whether taxpayers received

00:13:35.700 good value for their money.

00:13:38.300 Alberta Premier, Daniel...

00:13:39.900 Wait, just wait, just wait.

00:13:41.060 Before we go to this reporter, you can just see the way she sets it up. 0.98

00:13:44.280 Like, we are learning this information.

00:13:46.540 And some people are wondering if taxpayers get good value for their money.

00:13:51.260 Give me a break.

00:13:52.300 Give me an absolute break.

00:13:53.420 $10,000 for a diplomatic meeting that actually had huge consequences on Alberta and taxpayers,

00:13:59.580 which I'll explain in a bit. 0.79

00:14:00.940 But just the entire setup of this, again, just shows you how ridiculous the CBC...

00:14:05.320 It's like they're cosplaying journalism, but it's really just anti-conservative activism 0.95

00:14:09.700 promoting the carny liberals at all costs.

00:14:12.400 And it's just so, it's so transparently obvious.

00:14:15.220 Okay, let's resume this clip.

00:14:16.600 Premier Danielle Smith has called her meeting at Mar-a-Lago with then-president-elect Donald

00:14:21.200 Trump constructive.

00:14:22.780 Now, more details are emerging about the trip itself.

00:14:25.660 The visit in early January took place before Trump became president and came as a trade

00:14:31.500 war with the United States loomed.

00:14:34.060 Smith has said she emphasized the mutual importance of the U.S.-Canada energy relationship

00:14:38.780 and that she had discussions with key allies.

00:14:42.060 Documents obtained by CBC News through a Freedom of Information request outlined Smith made

00:14:47.220 the trip to Trump's Florida golf club with two government staffers and Alberta's senior

00:14:51.920 representative to the United States.

00:14:53.640 And records show the roughly 48-hour visit cost taxpayers more than $10,000.

00:14:59.380 What I asked the president was, do you want to buy more oil and gas from Canada?

00:15:03.440 And he said yes.

00:15:04.560 Concerns have been raised about the cost and value of the trip.

00:15:07.980 CBC News asked...

00:15:08.680 Okay, just pause it right there.

00:15:09.960 Pause it right there.

00:15:10.620 Concerns have been raised about the cost and the value, really?

00:15:13.660 By who?

00:15:14.220 By which credible sources?

00:15:15.400 Is there like a huge uprising of concerned citizens saying, like, how dare she spend... 0.63

00:15:21.400 I'm sorry, $10,000?

00:15:23.180 $10,000.

00:15:24.080 And she brought two staff, okay?

00:15:26.360 Two staffers and the premier.

00:15:28.740 They went all the way to Florida, had a whole bunch of meetings.

00:15:32.080 I interviewed Premier Smith and I asked her about this.

00:15:34.840 I asked her about a report that was in the Calgary Sun that when President Trump walked

00:15:38.960 into the room at Mar-a-Lago, he has these big kind of state ballroom dinners full of

00:15:44.720 dignitaries and full of people who just want to meet the president.

00:15:47.860 And when he saw Premier Smith, he beelined to her, went right up to her and started talking

00:15:52.180 to her.

00:15:52.480 And she confirmed that that was true and that they did have a constructive meeting.

00:15:56.180 Folks, just think about how much money the Ontario government, the federal government,

00:16:00.400 and every other government, is spending on lobbyists, is spending on, like, literally

00:16:04.440 just pouring out American-made alcohol that they had already purchased, right?

00:16:08.180 Like, think about all the wastefulness that has gone into this insane elbows-up movement,

00:16:13.260 this mass hysteria over the United States, and then compare that to $10,000 for an incredibly

00:16:19.440 constructive meeting that actually led to something tangible.

00:16:24.680 Because remember, when Donald Trump announced the tariffs, it was 25% tariffs on Canada and

00:16:29.440 only 10% on natural resources.

00:16:31.460 That 15% savings in the tariff came directly because of Premier Smith and her meeting and

00:16:38.520 her advocacy.

00:16:39.220 That is a direct line between that savings.

00:16:42.000 So, yeah, $10,000, I think it's worth it.

00:16:44.700 I think it's worth it, CBC. 0.91

00:16:46.160 All right, let's play the rest of this ridiculous report.

00:16:48.300 Asked the Premier's office how long Smith had with Trump and why so many people were involved

00:16:53.240 with the trip, but did not get a response.

00:16:55.680 So many people, there were three people.

00:16:57.240 There were three people involved.

00:16:59.600 They said Premier Smith and two of her advisors.

00:17:02.200 So I'm sorry, but we're supposed to believe a three-man team going to visit the President

00:17:06.780 of the United States is like a large team? 0.98

00:17:09.460 It's so ridiculous. 0.86

00:17:10.700 Okay, and then they go to a political science professor here that's supposed to, what, 0.94

00:17:15.800 somehow explain why this is a scandal.

00:17:17.900 Let's resume the clip.

00:17:19.000 We're talking about a large sum of money, $10,000.

00:17:22.720 No, we're not.

00:17:23.180 To be spent for perhaps more people being involved.

00:17:25.600 Sorry, just pause it again.

00:17:27.160 That's not a large sum of money.

00:17:28.760 That's not a large sum of money.

00:17:29.940 Okay, I looked it up, folks, because I like crunching numbers.

00:17:32.480 The government of Alberta in 2025 is projected to spend, it anticipates spending $79 billion,

00:17:40.780 $80 billion just in Alberta.

00:17:43.040 Forget about the feds.

00:17:43.900 Forget about all the other provinces.

00:17:45.140 Just the government of Alberta plans to spend $80 billion.

00:17:48.520 $10,000 as a percentage of $80 billion, because yes, I crunched the numbers, it is 0.000012%.

00:17:58.860 That's four zeros, 0.000012% of all federal, of all, sorry, provincial spending.

00:18:05.460 So that is not a large sum.

00:18:06.440 By any extent of the imagination, it is nothing.

00:18:09.620 It is absolutely nothing.

00:18:11.760 And I would guess that universally, Albertans would say that this was good value for money.

00:18:16.980 $10,000 for a meeting one-on-one with President Trump that directly resulted in a reduced tariff

00:18:25.060 by 15% that will save Alberta's economy untold billions.

00:18:29.420 So the whole idea behind this segment is propaganda and lies, and the fact that they found a political

00:18:35.340 science professor to pretend that this is a real thing, I mean, this is all a joke.

00:18:41.080 Federally funded, federally funded, federally funded, finding a bunch of liberals who are 0.93

00:18:44.580 all funded by the carny liberal government to pretend that anybody cares about this ridiculous

00:18:49.560 story, again, just shows you how unnecessary the CBC is, how political it is, how partisan 0.73

00:18:55.020 it is, and how just absolutely reprehensible it is that this thing continues to get funding.

00:19:01.740 Okay, let's resume the clip.

00:19:03.180 To be spent for perhaps more people being involved than were necessary for what might

00:19:07.540 have been a very brief exchange and had very little impact.

00:19:12.940 So it's about the wise expenditure.

00:19:15.080 It had a little impact.

00:19:16.020 It had a direct impact.

00:19:17.080 It had a direct impact in the tariff price.

00:19:19.040 So this political science professor has no idea what she's talking about, or she's pretending 0.98

00:19:23.020 that the thing that happened after this didn't actually happen, which, again, is just pathetic 0.98

00:19:28.500 and shameful. 0.95

00:19:29.180 Okay, resume.

00:19:29.640 The nature of scarce taxpayer dollars that comes into question in cases like this.

00:19:35.640 The premier's office pointed to comments she's previously made, where she said her strategy

00:19:39.880 was to meet with people who can influence the U.S. president.

00:19:43.540 Julia Wong, CBC News, Edmonton.

00:19:45.700 Okay, so just again, reason number 1005, why the CBC just should not be funded anymore. 0.92

00:19:52.880 This is so ridiculous. 0.75

00:19:54.100 They are trying to create a scandal out of nothing. 0.99

00:19:57.380 Quick question.

00:19:58.240 How much did it cost when Prime Minister Justin Trudeau went down to Mar-a-Lago?

00:20:02.140 Did the CBC bother to FOI that as well?

00:20:04.720 How about Doug Ford when he went down to Washington to meet with Howard Lutnik or other administration

00:20:10.040 officials?

00:20:11.400 How much did that cost?

00:20:12.360 Oh, because the CBC doesn't actually care, because when you're a liberal, you can get

00:20:16.120 away with anything.

00:20:17.100 If you're a conservative, they are going to all of a sudden become sleuths and try to

00:20:21.700 safeguard every last penny that the taxpayer is on the hook for, right?

00:20:25.900 When it comes to $1.5 billion for the CBC, no interest, no interest at all in whether the

00:20:31.180 money is well spent or providing a service for Canadians.

00:20:34.760 Of course not.

00:20:35.280 But if the Premier of Alberta spends $10,000 to secure the top meeting with the top official,

00:20:43.220 the most important person in the world, and especially when it comes to dealing with the

00:20:48.400 tariffs that he himself is imposing, yeah, I'm going to say $10,000 for a meeting with

00:20:52.720 President Trump by the Premier that literally changed the course of the tariffs for Alberta.

00:20:57.120 I'm going to say that that is good use of the money, better than all the lobbyists by the

00:21:02.920 federal government and the Ontario government, better than any of the other things that they

00:21:06.480 are trying to do.

00:21:07.520 Daniel Smith actually had results.

00:21:09.320 And again, this is why it brings me no joy to have to cover the CBC.

00:21:14.000 It actually pains me to have to watch their reporting because it's so cringe and so bad.

00:21:17.720 But folks, I just need you to know what they're reporting, what they're telling Canadians,

00:21:21.880 you know, those poor Canadians who don't know that there is an alternative, who are sitting 1.00

00:21:25.640 at home and they watch the CBC because they think that's the only option.

00:21:29.280 And they're fed this propaganda and they're fed this absolute nonsense.

00:21:32.600 It's honestly no, you can't really blame them for the way that they view the world and

00:21:36.660 the reason that they keep voting Liberals is because they're sucked into this propaganda

00:21:41.000 vortex.

00:21:41.860 And it is so shameful for a free country like Canada to have this kind of programming, which

00:21:46.760 again is why the CBC has to go.

00:21:49.120 All right, folks, that's all the time we have for today.

00:21:50.660 Thank you so much for tuning in.

00:21:52.380 I'm Candace Malcolm.

00:21:52.980 This is the Candace Malcolm Show.

00:21:53.900 We'll be back again tomorrow with all the news.

00:21:55.800 Thank you and God bless.

00:21:59.100 You're watching Juno News, Canada's fastest growing independent news network.

00:22:05.140 Our team works day and night to bring you nationwide coverage of the issues that matter.

00:22:12.900 Honest reporting of the stories that put Canadians.

00:22:16.760 From far and wide, Juno is doing the work to turn the dial in the right direction, bringing

00:22:25.260 you the news from the field and in the studio, wherever it takes us.

00:22:30.980 We get the job done for you, for Canada.

00:22:40.980 Subscribe today and help us replace the CBC.

00:22:45.240 Go to junonews.com to join the fight.

Juno News - May 06, 2025

Danielle Smith drops BOMBSHELL on Canada, outlines pathway to independence in 2026

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript