ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- August 28, 2023
Doctor sues Queen’s University over job loss for Covid opinions (ft. Dr. Matt Strauss)
Episode Stats
Length
16 minutes
Words per Minute
195.784
Word Count
3,164
Sentence Count
166
Misogynist Sentences
1
Hate Speech Sentences
2
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
One of the people who stands out as, and I don't use the word lightly, a hero of the
00:00:13.960
last several years is Dr. Matt Strauss.
00:00:17.220
Now, Dr. Strauss, you've seen on this program before, he's been a tremendous advocate for
00:00:21.900
not COVID denialism, not anti-vaccine rhetoric of just science and medicine and of taking
00:00:28.340
a very traditional view of medicine, which is that you should try to personalize it to
00:00:33.320
the patient and not paint entire societies and countries with a one-size-fits-all solution
00:00:39.160
when that may not fit their individual needs.
00:00:41.920
And he's also spoken at great length about the harms, the adverse effects of some of the
00:00:47.060
purported remedies and treatments, such as lockdowns, for example.
00:00:51.040
And it's his COVID skepticism that Dr. Strauss argues jeopardized his role at Queen's University
00:00:59.100
and ultimately led to him being forced out of that role.
00:01:01.740
He has now filed a lawsuit against Queen's.
00:01:05.860
And while we can't talk about this matter because it is before the legal system, I did
00:01:10.100
think it was a good opportunity to talk in general about the retrospective on this last
00:01:14.980
few years and where it all went so wrong from an academic freedom, a medical freedom and
00:01:20.540
a free speech perspective.
00:01:21.780
So Dr. Matt Strauss joins me now.
00:01:24.540
It's good to talk to you again, Dr. Strauss.
00:01:26.020
Thanks for coming back on the show.
00:01:27.680
It's always nice to talk to you, Andrew.
00:01:28.960
That introduction was too kind.
00:01:31.620
Well, it was very much deserved.
00:01:33.800
And I say that just to not to toot your horn even more, or maybe I am trying to do that.
00:01:38.840
But I say that because a lot of people didn't realize how much doctors were putting on the
00:01:43.780
line if they did speak out.
00:01:45.780
And I would say there were probably some cases where people didn't realize their own power
00:01:50.180
and they didn't realize that they did have a voice.
00:01:52.200
But but there were a lot of times where people said, look, it's if I speak up, I lose the
00:01:56.860
ability to practice medicine or they feared that was going to happen.
00:02:00.320
And I was wondering where you sort of land on this now, having seen some of your colleagues
00:02:04.700
and you've seen people go through this process.
00:02:06.860
Do you think that the negative consequences for those who spoke out are over?
00:02:12.240
Oh, no, certainly the negative consequences aren't over.
00:02:16.760
And that's not just for physicians.
00:02:19.520
You know, since I started speaking out about some of my concerns about pandemic management,
00:02:24.680
but especially since unfortunately, this news of my lawsuit was made public, I've heard
00:02:31.180
from so many Canadians.
00:02:32.320
A real estate agent texted me today to say that she had had a hard time being able to
00:02:36.460
speak out child, a child psychologist reached out to me, a construction company executive.
00:02:43.160
I've I've heard from school board trustees like it.
00:02:45.480
It seems to me that throughout Canada exacerbated during the pandemic.
00:02:49.480
But in all areas of public life, people feel that they can't speak their mind.
00:02:55.700
And my my fundamental concern is we're not going to have good public policy if we don't
00:02:59.700
have good public debates about things.
00:03:02.620
So I see in every area that people are still suffering from things that happened to them.
00:03:08.460
And, you know, I think you were speaking about wildfires and climate change before I came
00:03:12.920
on.
00:03:13.900
In some ways, we're suffering from it now.
00:03:15.720
I want to hear from a forestry expert.
00:03:17.820
I want to hear from firefighter experts about what could be better about our wildfire response
00:03:22.400
right now.
00:03:23.200
So so no, I don't I don't think this problem has gone away.
00:03:25.920
And I think we all need to keep pushing against it and just speaking out for a free, open,
00:03:29.920
liberal, democratic society where people can speak their mind.
00:03:33.420
You know, in some cases, there is a reason that we have certain established facts in science.
00:03:39.840
And I'd say in medicine, there are probably certain things that are fairly universal and,
00:03:44.960
you know, certain medical treatments of history that have been lost to history and probably
00:03:48.840
for good reason.
00:03:49.560
So on one hand, we don't want the doctor that's going to come out and say, oh, you know what?
00:03:53.220
I think bloodletting needs to make a comeback or something like that.
00:03:55.920
But at the same time, we also need to have room to discuss and to debate.
00:04:00.520
And when the science isn't clear to say, well, hang on, I you know what I'm seeing in my
00:04:04.040
patients is this or what I'm seeing in this study is this.
00:04:06.660
And I'm curious where that I mean, how should you let yourself as a physician be guided in
00:04:13.100
that?
00:04:13.300
Because on one hand, you want to do what's in the best interest of your patients.
00:04:16.000
And but on the other hand, if a problem is presenting itself, you don't always have
00:04:19.700
time to go through that, you know, academic discourse and study when you're figuring
00:04:23.420
it out.
00:04:23.780
And I'm talking, of course, about the pandemic.
00:04:25.380
I believe that it provided a sense of urgency for doctors.
00:04:28.680
But but what was the proper response to that without, you know, basically belaboring
00:04:33.740
something where urgency was required?
00:04:35.580
So the practice of medicine needs to be sacrosanct.
00:04:40.960
It needs to be approached with great humility and a lot of caution.
00:04:45.460
And professional bodies do need to govern how medicine is practiced.
00:04:48.860
So if if I were going out saying Andrew Lawton, I think that you should you should treat your
00:04:54.460
COVID with acupuncture.
00:04:55.840
That would be wrong because acupuncture doesn't treat COVID and I'm not your physician.
00:05:00.900
I haven't done a history and a physical on you.
00:05:03.400
We're speaking in public.
00:05:05.000
You're not benefiting from physician patient confidentiality right now.
00:05:08.300
So I really take very seriously the sorts of recommendations that physicians give to their
00:05:15.580
patients.
00:05:16.000
But that that's different than having a concern about public policy.
00:05:19.680
And again, I don't want to get into the facts surrounding the case, but it fundamentally
00:05:24.680
it was made clear to me that the problem I was having with the administration was that
00:05:29.360
I criticized the government.
00:05:30.300
And that's that's very different from practicing medicine.
00:05:32.820
So physicians need to be able to criticize the government.
00:05:35.540
They need to be able to criticize public policy.
00:05:37.860
Um, but I 100% agree that physicians cannot cannot recommend quackery to their patients
00:05:43.700
and nor should they be making medical recommendations to people who are not their patients in public
00:05:47.320
or otherwise.
00:05:48.340
The funny thing too about universities, and I don't want to draw a false equivalence between
00:05:52.640
real science and, you know, political science, which I studied, but, you know, universities
00:05:57.320
pride themselves on being anti-authoritarian in so many other disciplines.
00:06:01.200
You know, they would celebrate a professor who came out with some scathing report that condemned
00:06:06.180
the government's approach on, you know, some national security law or something like that.
00:06:10.380
And it's weird that that skepticism of academic inquiry and really the purpose of academic
00:06:15.720
inquiry, which in university medicine, I think is incredibly important, is completely gone
00:06:20.140
on this.
00:06:20.640
The government says it, ergo, we just accept it.
00:06:23.880
Yeah, I think this is a bit new.
00:06:26.360
I think I think it was seen, um, prior to COVID, uh, around things to do with, I think,
00:06:32.560
I, obviously the, um, the Israel and Palestine conflict will be with us forever, but I know
00:06:37.720
that on both sides of that, uh, that set of issues, professors ran afoul of their administration
00:06:43.360
over the last 10 years.
00:06:44.580
But, uh, 100%, this, this idea of academic freedom being sacrosanct was a foundational
00:06:50.480
principle to universities for hundreds of years.
00:06:53.060
Um, in one meeting that I went to, I brought up Chomsky was a, uh, uh, I think it's fair
00:06:58.900
to say a radical leftist and a very interesting thinker, um, was, was arrested by the government
00:07:04.880
at one point for attending a Vietnam war protest.
00:07:06.840
And as, as far as I'm aware, his institution, uh, stuck, um, with him, uh, through thick and
00:07:12.280
thin.
00:07:12.620
And, and thank goodness, because I don't, I certainly don't agree with Chomsky and everything,
00:07:16.180
but I, he's a profoundly interesting thinker.
00:07:18.800
And I have benefited from, uh, hearing his thoughts and I, and I've come to agree with
00:07:22.520
him about how many of the things that he has said since, since the sixties and that
00:07:25.760
arrest.
00:07:26.760
And one of the problems with, with governments, and I'm, I'm using the, them, that in the
00:07:31.020
broadest possible sense of, of just institutions in general is that they are fallible and, and
00:07:36.620
they know they're fallible in some cases.
00:07:38.300
They don't often admit it.
00:07:39.360
Uh, one example that comes to mind is Western university, my alma mater, you went there for,
00:07:44.580
for med school as well.
00:07:45.640
This is a university that had, uh, I think it was a one of a kind or maybe one of two
00:07:50.080
in the country, which was this academic year, putting in place a booster mandate for students,
00:07:55.100
not just a vaccine mandate, but a booster mandate, which was supposed to go into effect
00:07:59.040
in, uh, September of, I guess it would have been 2022.
00:08:02.840
And there was a rally held a round a year ago at which I spoke at which you spoke at
00:08:07.700
which, uh, your, your medical colleague, Dr.
00:08:09.760
Martha Fulford spoke and a number of student activists and Western eventually backed off that.
00:08:14.600
Now they didn't credit it to the backlash.
00:08:16.160
They just kind of just let it die on the order paper.
00:08:19.080
And then a few months later said it's no longer necessary.
00:08:21.460
But, uh, there's a case in which Western said one day the science requires a booster
00:08:25.640
for students.
00:08:26.280
And the next day said the science no longer requires a booster for students.
00:08:30.040
Uh, so this deference that was expected of you at Queens and of people elsewhere is on
00:08:36.480
its face absurd because how is that deference supposed to factor into a world in which governments
00:08:41.440
will change what they believe the science leads them to?
00:08:45.480
Yeah.
00:08:45.800
I, and thank you for bringing up that episode with Western and I I'm biased.
00:08:49.840
I love Western.
00:08:50.760
I'll always love Western.
00:08:51.760
I'm glad they did the right thing in the end.
00:08:53.720
Um, and I, I was so proud and lucky to be part of that, that student led movement.
00:09:00.440
Um, and, but it is true that whoever was doing the university's press releases at that time,
00:09:06.760
um, who I'm almost sure was not a scientist, but a communications professional of some sort
00:09:11.320
or another was, was claiming that the science was on their side and science, um, science doesn't
00:09:16.120
really take sides.
00:09:16.920
Science is a process of open inquiry and debate and evidence gathering and, um, argument synthesis.
00:09:23.000
So it, it certainly wasn't the case in that instance that the science was on their side.
00:09:27.960
Um, and I'm, I'm glad Dr. Fulford and I were able to, to draw some attention to that.
00:09:33.160
And I, I guess I, I, I like to think that we had some effect on that ineffective and harmful
00:09:40.440
mandate being withdrawn.
00:09:41.640
Um, I, I would have liked to have seen maybe a bit of a mea culpa from the university on that
00:09:46.520
point of view, but I, I still love them.
00:09:48.200
Um, when you look around at Queens in your situation, and again, I'm, I'm very careful.
00:09:53.720
I know you can't talk about too much of the facts of the case.
00:09:56.360
So if I'm, if I'm asking too much, please let me know and I'll, I'll back off.
00:09:59.640
But, but when you look around and saw the dynamic with your colleagues there, were you just the
00:10:04.280
outspoken one and, and everyone else was kind of the same as you were on this, but didn't
00:10:08.960
want to put their neck out or, or did you really feel like you were alone in this and
00:10:13.320
that, you know, everyone else was really, uh, adopting that line that you were expected
00:10:17.640
to adopt genuinely?
00:10:19.880
I certainly am not the only one who felt the way that I did.
00:10:23.080
Um, I was the only outspoken one who, to my knowledge, I was the only outspoken one to
00:10:29.960
maybe have a set of, uh, views that I had.
00:10:32.920
There were several, I had several outspoken colleagues who took maybe some views contrary
00:10:37.480
to mine, and I would have loved to have had a debate with them, uh, either, you know,
00:10:41.720
either on a podcast or somewhere at the university.
00:10:44.760
Um, it became clear that you were, it became clear to me at many universities that individuals
00:10:52.360
who were towing the party line were allowed to be outspoken and people who criticized the
00:10:56.040
party line were not allowed to be outspoken.
00:10:57.960
But I, um, throughout all of this, uh, like I said, I've heard from so many Canadians of all
00:11:02.680
walks of life, but many of them were, um, colleagues of mine at the university.
00:11:07.000
And I'm not a political person.
00:11:09.880
I'm not a political organizer.
00:11:11.080
I, I never, I never thought, oh, I know what I'll do.
00:11:13.800
I'll organize a demonstration or I'll organize a petition or something like that.
00:11:17.240
And maybe that was an error of mine.
00:11:19.480
Um, but I, I, they, you know, they had careers, they were doing work that was really important.
00:11:25.160
Um, they also have mortgages and kids and that sort of thing.
00:11:27.640
And I, it never occurred to me to, um, ask someone to stick their own neck out.
00:11:33.480
Um, and, but, and I, and I, I understand that it's, I, it's a, it's a lot to chew off.
00:11:42.120
Uh, and one does not want to bite off more than one can chew.
00:11:46.040
Well, one of the challenges, I mean, you literally had your, I, I didn't, I'd missed this part of
00:11:50.760
your story.
00:11:51.160
And I, when I read about it in the national post, you had had your belongings shoved into
00:11:54.520
a cardboard box.
00:11:55.800
I mean, one of the most sort of depersoning things that, you know, an employer can do.
00:12:00.360
And, and you had that done to you.
00:12:01.640
And, and at the time, if I recall, it had kind of blindsided you in a way, because you weren't
00:12:06.520
even aware there was an issue.
00:12:07.640
Like you weren't even aware that you had been doing something even purportedly wrong in the
00:12:12.360
university's eyes.
00:12:14.840
Um, I would, I would rather not speak with great specificity about what I thought and when,
00:12:23.080
and, and what I perceived and when, because I, um, uh, that would, that would be a little
00:12:28.120
bit from the hip.
00:12:28.760
And, and I, I just want, I want to be really, really careful.
00:12:32.120
Well, let, let, let me, let me take a different approach then on, on this, which is to ask you
00:12:38.440
how you feel about what happened moving beyond it.
00:12:41.480
I know that's sort of a sappy question that I would, you know, criticize most hard hitting
00:12:45.640
journalists for asking, but, but I'll ask you how you feel looking back at it.
00:12:48.680
Because I, I've never seen from you, even when this has been going on anything resembling,
00:12:53.160
uh, bitterness or antipathy to Queens.
00:12:55.000
In fact, I've only ever heard you speak highly about your, your time at, in academia, both
00:12:59.720
as a student and as a, as on the, the admin side.
00:13:03.640
I guess I have a few things to say about that.
00:13:04.760
One is I, I, it was a great privilege.
00:13:08.040
It was, um, the best job I've ever had getting to, to teach medical students.
00:13:13.400
Um, and you know, I still practice medicine.
00:13:16.440
It's, it's always a privilege to get to look after, uh, folks who are having a hard time,
00:13:20.280
uh, who are ill.
00:13:21.480
So, um, and, and to my former colleagues, even the ones who disagreed with me, um, I, I, I, I honestly
00:13:29.560
have nothing but, but love.
00:13:30.760
Um, I, this lawsuit is a dispute with, with some, some elements of the administration.
00:13:37.240
Um, but frankly, I, I received, um, not just from colleagues, uh, uh, texts of, of, uh,
00:13:44.280
support, but, but also from professors in other departments.
00:13:47.560
So a professor of law and a professor of bioethics both reached out to me, you know, way back
00:13:51.720
when, when, when all this was happening.
00:13:53.400
So I, I have so much warmth for the, the Queens community that, that, that is not at all what,
00:14:01.160
um, what this is about.
00:14:02.200
And I wouldn't want it to be framed as me having anything other than, um,
00:14:07.960
warmth for my students and the colleagues and my colleagues, um, former colleagues, I guess.
00:14:12.600
And the other thing I will say is everyone had a really bad pandemic.
00:14:15.880
I had a bad pandemic in some ways, but, um, I, I saw horrible things that, um, that happened
00:14:23.720
to my patients both because of COVID and all the other ways that, um, the pandemic and the
00:14:28.680
pandemic restrictions, uh, affected their lives.
00:14:31.480
So I, you know, I had folks who were, um, between life and death in the ICU for three months,
00:14:36.520
who weren't allowed to have their family visit.
00:14:38.200
And I, uh, it was like Russian novel levels of misery and despair.
00:14:44.680
Um, so I can't, I can't even somewhat feel bad about, uh, about what happened to me, I guess.
00:14:52.840
Like in, in contrary, and, and, and so I would say that if I'm, if I'm outspoken
00:14:57.880
about these issues and if I'm maybe pugilistic in terms of defending this principle of academic
00:15:03.400
freedom, I hope I'm doing it for these more public concerns than what happened to me.
00:15:08.280
Cause I, I'm fine.
00:15:09.000
I have a roof over my head.
00:15:09.880
I have, I have three square meals a day and I have a family that loves me.
00:15:13.400
Um, so I, I, I can't complain.
00:15:16.680
Well, that's a wonderful, wonderful way to put it.
00:15:19.000
And I actually think it's an incredibly thoughtful way of putting it because so much of what we've
00:15:24.200
seen of the edicts have come from people that weren't affected by what they were doing.
00:15:28.840
I mean, someone who's married and has a family at home telling someone who lives alone that
00:15:34.760
they have to stay at home alone and can't go see their neighbors.
00:15:37.640
Someone who doesn't have a family member dying in a care home telling other people that they can't
00:15:43.080
go and visit their loved one, their grandma or father or whatever in a, in a care home.
00:15:47.320
So all of these things that I would agree were, were absolutely horrible.
00:15:49.960
And I, I'm glad you've come through it the way you have.
00:15:52.440
And, uh, I wish you well in this lawsuit, Dr. Matt Strauss.
00:15:55.560
Always a pleasure.
00:15:56.200
Thanks for coming on, Matt.
00:15:57.160
Nice to see you.
00:15:58.040
Thanks for listening to the Andrew Lawton Show.
00:16:00.680
Support the program by donating to True North at www.tnc.news.
00:16:07.640
www.tnc.news.com
Link copied!