ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- September 16, 2020
Ep 12 | Pierre Poilievre | Holding Trudeau to account
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 6 minutes
Words per Minute
165.06636
Word Count
11,031
Sentence Count
406
Misogynist Sentences
5
Hate Speech Sentences
14
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
I think he said to himself, I can do anything I want.
00:00:03.800
You know, no one questions anything.
00:00:07.420
It seems that the normal parliamentary accountability mechanisms are obliterated.
00:00:14.020
So I think the group of them around Trudeau said,
00:00:16.420
we now have unfettered access to the public purse with no scrutiny.
00:00:21.740
And anybody who asks us a question about it,
00:00:23.880
we'll simply accuse them of nasty partisanship in the middle of a pandemic.
00:00:27.660
And we'll assert our pure motives and we'll do whatever the hell we please.
00:00:32.980
That's what I think, that's where I think their headspace was.
00:00:36.160
And frankly, I think if the media had been doing its job,
00:00:39.360
he probably would have been on his toes
00:00:40.960
and he probably wouldn't have been so sloppy in this corruption.
00:00:43.700
How can Canadians hold the minority liberal government to account?
00:00:47.160
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau shut down Parliament
00:00:49.400
just as he shut down the economy in response to COVID-19,
00:00:53.920
choosing instead to hold daily press conferences
00:00:56.520
with hand-selected, friendly journalists from the mainstream media.
00:01:01.120
There was no oversight, no accountability, and no transparency.
00:01:04.860
Just daily propaganda sessions with liberal journalists
00:01:08.100
lobbying softball questions at their favourite liberal celebrity.
00:01:11.900
Can you describe specifically what your self-isolation means
00:01:15.320
both for you and your family and your wife?
00:01:18.180
You're outside right now.
00:01:20.160
Is your wife still going outside?
00:01:21.720
Is your family still going outside?
00:01:22.840
What does self-isolation actually mean for your family?
00:01:24.920
And what are you telling your children about the heightened sense of concern
00:01:28.680
in the country?
00:01:29.800
And also, how are you explaining some of the political decisions that you're making?
00:01:33.580
Okay, that is the Prime Minister of Canada on this Tuesday morning.
00:01:37.040
And I'll just say what everyone is thinking
00:01:38.840
before we get into the meat of what he said.
00:01:40.780
Yes, he did get a haircut.
00:01:41.700
When Canadians began to learn about the damage that Trudeau had done during his time,
00:01:46.540
racking up half a trillion dollars in debt,
00:01:48.820
handing out the doomed $900 million We Charity contract,
00:01:52.700
and the mysterious case of 20,000 missing infrastructure projects,
00:01:57.880
Trudeau shut down the investigations by proroguing Parliament.
00:02:00.940
On today's episode of the True North Speaker series,
00:02:04.860
I sit down with one of the few figures in Canada
00:02:07.200
willing to challenge our Prime Minister
00:02:09.260
and hold him accountable for his scandalous ethics violations
00:02:13.080
and the disastrous fiscal policies
00:02:15.620
that put our entire economy, our entire country at risk.
00:02:19.440
Pierre Polyev is the Conservative Member of Parliament
00:02:22.200
for the Ottawa-based riding of Carleton,
00:02:25.060
where he's been the MP since 2004.
00:02:27.260
Paulieff serves as the Conservative Party's finance critic,
00:02:31.380
and he was instrumental in drawing out new information
00:02:34.100
and exposing the many contradictions and changing narrative
00:02:37.800
Trudeau offered during the We Scam testimonies.
00:02:41.280
I really enjoyed watching him hold Trudeau directly accountable
00:02:44.780
during his parliamentary committee hearings,
00:02:46.960
and I really enjoyed sitting down with Pierre
00:02:49.180
to talk about all of the problems facing Ottawa
00:02:52.200
and how a Conservative government would offer a better vision for Canada.
00:02:56.680
I hope you enjoy our conversation.
00:02:58.880
Let me know what you think in the comments section,
00:03:00.560
and please share this video with friends and like-minded Canadians.
00:03:15.360
Pierre, thank you so much for joining us.
00:03:17.180
Thank you for coming on to the Speaker Series.
00:03:19.060
It's great to have you today.
00:03:20.720
Great to be with you.
00:03:21.600
Well, so before we get into all of the politics
00:03:24.920
and everything that's going on in Ottawa these days,
00:03:27.280
I want to talk a little bit about you and your background.
00:03:30.340
So you are an Ottawa-area MP.
00:03:32.960
You've been representing the people of Nepean for, what, 15 years now?
00:03:38.600
Since 2004.
00:03:40.660
And it was Nepean-Carleton.
00:03:43.680
I unfortunately lost Nepean in the redistribution,
00:03:46.080
so I'm now on the Carleton area, which is sort of southwest Ottawa.
00:03:50.600
Okay.
00:03:51.420
Interesting.
00:03:52.040
But before that, you are from Alberta,
00:03:54.760
which I was just reading your background, your history.
00:03:57.320
It seems like you really cut your teeth in Alberta politics.
00:04:01.520
You were just mentioning off camera that you work for the Byfields,
00:04:04.800
who were the founders of the Alberta Report.
00:04:06.580
So why don't you tell us about young Pierre
00:04:08.420
and the early days working in politics?
00:04:10.800
Well, when I was a teenager, I went to a few meetings
00:04:16.100
for Ralph Klein's Progressive Conservatives
00:04:19.640
and Preston Manning's Reformers
00:04:21.880
and met Preston Manning when I was 16 years old.
00:04:24.820
He represented my southwest Calgary neighbourhood in Parliament
00:04:28.580
and got an intern working for a local Calgary MP
00:04:34.040
when I was 16 or 17 years old
00:04:36.400
and made 600 bucks a month.
00:04:40.380
And it was an hour and a half bus ride each way.
00:04:45.280
So that was how I started off in politics.
00:04:48.120
It was not glamorous,
00:04:49.360
but I was thrilled at that age to get involved.
00:04:52.340
I then became Jason Kenney's intern
00:04:54.120
when I was 18 or 19 years old.
00:04:57.780
And he was one of my great mentors.
00:05:00.440
When I was in my early 20s,
00:05:01.740
I moved to Ottawa to work for Stockwell Bay.
00:05:03.780
And not long after that,
00:05:06.580
I decided to take a crazy gamble
00:05:10.020
and run for a Conservative nomination
00:05:12.080
for the newly merged party
00:05:14.000
in an Ottawa seat that we hadn't won since 1984.
00:05:18.840
And I've been elected six times since.
00:05:21.940
So tell us a little bit about the riding that you represent,
00:05:25.400
because I think a lot of people in Western Canada,
00:05:28.340
you know, they think of Ottawa
00:05:29.300
as a very left-wing kind of government town.
00:05:31.780
And yet you seem to represent a Conservative stronghold.
00:05:35.240
So tell us a little bit about the riding that you represent.
00:05:38.720
Well, it is basically south of the airport.
00:05:42.700
Then it goes west all the way to
00:05:45.020
where the Ottawa Senators Stadium is
00:05:48.960
on the 417 Highway.
00:05:51.600
I'm going to estimate about 75% of my residents are suburban
00:05:55.760
and about 25% are village or semi-rural.
00:06:00.260
All of my riding is in the city of Ottawa.
00:06:03.380
There are a lot of government workers,
00:06:05.280
a fair amount of high-tech employment as well.
00:06:08.740
There is a small farming population
00:06:11.400
that sort of shrinks a little bit each year, unfortunately.
00:06:14.860
But, you know, it had not been Conservative since 1984.
00:06:20.600
The Conservatives had lost it in 88, 93, 97, 2000,
00:06:26.380
before I won it in 2004.
00:06:30.200
So it can be a bit of a swing riding.
00:06:32.460
It's gone both ways.
00:06:33.600
And right now it's the only blue riding
00:06:35.580
on the federal map in the city of Ottawa.
00:06:38.420
We've got seven Liberals and one Conservative.
00:06:40.320
So I'm the chair of the Ottawa Conservative Caucus.
00:06:44.280
Well, good for you.
00:06:45.400
I mean, I think that the Conservatives
00:06:46.900
definitely have their work cut out for them
00:06:48.820
in Ontario in general.
00:06:51.320
I think that's one of the other questions
00:06:52.780
that I wanted to ask you is that
00:06:54.220
it really feels like the country is divided.
00:06:56.560
I saw some polling that came out last week
00:06:58.820
that basically showed that the Liberals
00:07:00.740
are more favourable everywhere west of Ontario
00:07:04.780
and everywhere, or sorry, everywhere east of Ontario
00:07:07.240
and everywhere west,
00:07:08.100
the Conservatives are up considerably.
00:07:10.320
And there seems to be that divide.
00:07:12.480
So, you know, for Western Canadians
00:07:14.780
watching this podcast here,
00:07:16.520
what is it that Western Canadians don't know
00:07:19.380
or don't really understand about the Ontario voter?
00:07:24.140
Well, you know, I'm in a unique position
00:07:27.140
because my riding is in Ottawa,
00:07:29.520
which is the nation's capital,
00:07:30.880
and it's right on the border with Quebec.
00:07:32.420
So, you know, from where I'm sitting
00:07:33.940
in my basement here,
00:07:35.600
I've got five provinces west of me,
00:07:37.780
five provinces east of me.
00:07:39.340
And it gives me a bit of an insight into both sides.
00:07:44.000
You know, I think that the differences
00:07:46.720
are not as great as they seem.
00:07:50.460
We have right now is an extremely divisive prime minister.
00:07:55.060
You know, we've had,
00:07:55.960
we have a conservative provincial government
00:07:57.800
in Ontario,
00:07:58.540
just like people do in Alberta and Saskatchewan.
00:08:00.400
Saskatchewan.
00:08:01.500
So at a provincial level,
00:08:03.180
we're, you know,
00:08:03.800
pretty much have the same governing philosophy
00:08:05.940
in charge and victorious
00:08:07.520
in this province as, you know,
00:08:10.580
the Western prairie provinces do.
00:08:13.520
But the difference is that
00:08:15.480
we have a prime minister who's decided
00:08:17.500
to mercilessly wage economic warfare
00:08:20.520
against Alberta, Saskatchewan,
00:08:23.800
parts of Northern and Interior British Columbia
00:08:27.580
with his hostility to the resource sector.
00:08:31.480
So in Ontario,
00:08:32.840
the big population centres,
00:08:36.020
Toronto, Ottawa, etc.
00:08:37.800
are not directly resource-driven economies.
00:08:43.080
They haven't felt the brunt yet of that war.
00:08:46.280
They will.
00:08:47.260
I mean, look,
00:08:47.820
Toronto's financial sector
00:08:49.100
has made billions of dollars
00:08:51.720
investing quite rightly
00:08:53.340
in the energy sector.
00:08:56.300
So Torontonians will feel the pain
00:08:58.320
if this idiocy goes on.
00:09:02.360
Ottawa residents will feel the pain as well
00:09:04.960
because, of course,
00:09:06.520
the public service work relies
00:09:08.500
on the tax revenues
00:09:09.580
that the resource sector has paid
00:09:12.440
so consistently over so many decades.
00:09:15.740
So the whole country
00:09:16.660
will ultimately suffer
00:09:18.040
from this anti-resource agenda.
00:09:21.280
But Albertans and Saskatchewanians
00:09:23.780
are just the first to feel it
00:09:25.540
and thus the first
00:09:26.840
to be justifiably angry about it.
00:09:29.580
You know, I read a lot of
00:09:31.440
the sort of Laurentian elite commentary
00:09:34.300
in the major newspapers
00:09:35.820
and it seems like the consensus
00:09:37.680
is basically that, you know,
00:09:40.120
the oil sands are bad for the environment
00:09:42.360
and it's just inevitable
00:09:44.100
that we have to phase them out
00:09:45.500
and that's just the role
00:09:46.520
of the federal government.
00:09:47.640
And also that a government
00:09:49.860
cannot win power,
00:09:51.500
they cannot get votes
00:09:52.640
in specifically Quebec
00:09:54.260
but also Ontario
00:09:55.400
without, you know,
00:09:57.480
a green agenda
00:09:58.340
and a very ambitious
00:09:59.480
sort of green environmentalist plan.
00:10:02.340
Do you accept that premise
00:10:05.160
or what do you make
00:10:06.140
of the elites that say that?
00:10:09.040
Well, they're not talking
00:10:10.080
to ordinary people.
00:10:10.980
I can say in my riding,
00:10:12.300
I overtly campaign
00:10:13.740
in favor of pipelines.
00:10:15.020
The Energy East pipeline
00:10:16.000
was going to run
00:10:16.660
right through my riding
00:10:17.560
and I was happy to support it
00:10:20.160
from the very beginning.
00:10:21.760
In fact, my liberal opponent
00:10:23.580
tried to pretend
00:10:24.360
he was for pipelines as well
00:10:26.160
because he knew
00:10:27.720
that that's where
00:10:28.280
the population was.
00:10:29.320
Everyday people understand
00:10:31.780
that pipelines make sense.
00:10:34.020
In fact,
00:10:34.880
what a lot of conservatives
00:10:35.940
miss is Trudeau doesn't
00:10:37.820
overtly or publicly
00:10:39.600
oppose pipelines.
00:10:41.060
He does it
00:10:41.860
in all of his actions.
00:10:43.200
He pretends
00:10:43.700
that he's trying
00:10:44.160
to get them built
00:10:44.820
but in reality
00:10:46.320
he uses all the levers
00:10:47.620
of the state
00:10:48.200
to stop it from happening.
00:10:50.040
So he wouldn't be doing that
00:10:52.060
if pipelines weren't popular.
00:10:55.060
If you look back
00:10:55.760
at his statements
00:10:56.620
in the House of Commons,
00:10:57.520
he very rarely
00:10:58.420
confesses his real opinion
00:11:00.580
on pipelines.
00:11:01.620
He always says,
00:11:02.320
oh, we're trying
00:11:02.860
to work together
00:11:03.580
with all the different groups
00:11:04.760
and make it happen
00:11:05.640
and we're going
00:11:06.600
through all the steps
00:11:07.360
and gosh golly,
00:11:08.740
darn, I'm trying so hard
00:11:10.000
it just doesn't seem
00:11:10.700
to work out.
00:11:11.560
Meanwhile,
00:11:12.100
he's using all
00:11:13.240
of the bureaucratic machinery
00:11:15.000
to stop it from occurring.
00:11:17.100
But my point here is
00:11:18.380
the population
00:11:19.680
overwhelmingly supports pipelines
00:11:21.240
in every region.
00:11:22.780
There's even strong support
00:11:23.780
in Quebec for pipelines.
00:11:24.860
We know that there's
00:11:26.600
a $14 billion
00:11:27.360
natural gas pipeline
00:11:29.040
and liquefaction project
00:11:30.640
that awaits federal approval
00:11:31.960
in the Saguenay
00:11:32.700
for which there's
00:11:33.740
overwhelming support
00:11:34.660
by the Quebec government.
00:11:36.140
So there is public support
00:11:37.620
everywhere.
00:11:38.080
And in fact,
00:11:38.540
the province
00:11:39.680
that was most devastated
00:11:41.000
to learn
00:11:41.440
that the Energy East project
00:11:43.300
was killed
00:11:44.000
was actually not
00:11:45.480
Alberta or Saskatchewan
00:11:46.520
though they were
00:11:47.060
justifiably outraged.
00:11:48.400
It was New Brunswick
00:11:49.200
because New Brunswickers
00:11:50.920
were going to refine
00:11:52.740
all of that Western petroleum
00:11:55.420
had the pipeline
00:11:56.720
gone ahead.
00:11:57.520
A million barrels a day
00:11:58.480
would have arrived
00:11:59.080
from Alberta
00:11:59.780
in New Brunswick.
00:12:02.260
So we have national support
00:12:04.040
for pipelines.
00:12:05.020
Where we have failed
00:12:06.100
is in properly exposing
00:12:07.600
the fact that
00:12:08.260
there is a single obstacle
00:12:10.080
to pipelines
00:12:10.700
in this country
00:12:11.340
and his name is
00:12:12.500
Justin Trudeau.
00:12:13.620
That's a really interesting point
00:12:15.000
and I hadn't really thought of it
00:12:16.220
but now that I do,
00:12:17.200
you know,
00:12:17.880
when you're looking for
00:12:19.080
examples of how
00:12:20.560
the Liberals oppose pipelines
00:12:22.240
it's usually like
00:12:23.140
something that Gerald Butts
00:12:24.380
said like 15 years ago
00:12:25.880
or something that Trudeau
00:12:27.280
said sort of sneakily
00:12:28.460
in a French language debate
00:12:30.080
that they don't sort of
00:12:31.300
overtly come out.
00:12:32.040
And I recall even
00:12:32.740
at the sort of beginning
00:12:33.560
they sort of
00:12:35.080
beat their chest
00:12:35.920
and said,
00:12:36.380
look,
00:12:36.600
we've actually had
00:12:37.240
more pipelines approved
00:12:38.200
than the Harper government
00:12:39.140
which wasn't true
00:12:41.320
but that was sort of
00:12:42.120
the line that the Liberals took.
00:12:43.480
But it does,
00:12:44.480
Pierre,
00:12:44.720
seem like there is
00:12:45.380
a shift going on.
00:12:46.260
We saw it
00:12:46.840
with Christia Freeland
00:12:48.340
in her sort of
00:12:49.300
first press conference
00:12:50.180
as finance minister
00:12:51.920
stating that the
00:12:53.520
regrowth
00:12:54.740
or the recreation
00:12:55.740
of the economy
00:12:56.480
after the COVID lockdowns
00:12:57.780
here was going to be
00:12:58.980
built on green
00:13:00.380
you know,
00:13:01.840
plans and schemes
00:13:02.700
and there's been
00:13:03.340
a lot of speculation
00:13:04.160
about what's to come
00:13:05.660
in the upcoming
00:13:06.380
throne speech.
00:13:07.720
So,
00:13:08.140
do you think that
00:13:09.360
perhaps the Liberals
00:13:10.820
are taking that shift?
00:13:12.080
That they're going to do
00:13:13.220
a sort of
00:13:13.960
far left shift
00:13:15.120
as what is sort of
00:13:16.500
being implied
00:13:17.400
in the media
00:13:17.800
these days?
00:13:18.360
Yes,
00:13:19.700
I expect a radical
00:13:21.460
new experiment.
00:13:24.360
Gerald Butts
00:13:25.240
who effectively
00:13:26.220
is running the government
00:13:27.280
put together
00:13:28.460
a group of people
00:13:29.980
to write a report
00:13:31.160
on what
00:13:32.220
the post-COVID
00:13:34.280
Canadian economy
00:13:35.000
should look like.
00:13:36.740
And surprise,
00:13:37.380
surprise,
00:13:38.300
they came up
00:13:38.880
with a
00:13:39.220
$49.9 billion
00:13:41.100
green plan.
00:13:42.820
I love how it was
00:13:43.820
$49.9 billion.
00:13:46.040
You know,
00:13:46.700
it's kind of like
00:13:47.380
when you're buying
00:13:48.340
a t-shirt
00:13:48.940
at the store,
00:13:51.760
they don't want
00:13:52.440
to charge you
00:13:52.960
$50,
00:13:53.800
they charge you
00:13:54.380
$49.99
00:13:56.200
so that you think
00:13:57.600
it's a bargain.
00:14:00.140
And,
00:14:00.440
you know,
00:14:00.840
for the very
00:14:01.580
low price
00:14:03.920
with this limited
00:14:04.500
time offer,
00:14:05.340
if you just call
00:14:05.800
this 1-800 number,
00:14:07.960
Gerald will sell
00:14:08.900
you a green economy
00:14:09.860
for $49 billion.
00:14:12.640
But,
00:14:13.160
you know,
00:14:13.800
I can tell you
00:14:14.540
the first thing
00:14:15.100
is if you are
00:14:16.380
a liberal insider,
00:14:17.280
you are going
00:14:17.840
to get
00:14:18.200
fabulously wealthy
00:14:19.880
off of this.
00:14:21.200
There will be
00:14:21.600
many millionaires,
00:14:22.500
maybe even
00:14:22.840
a few billionaires
00:14:23.680
that will
00:14:24.780
result
00:14:26.360
from
00:14:27.380
this plan
00:14:28.380
if it goes ahead.
00:14:29.960
There will be
00:14:30.340
subsidies
00:14:30.760
for phony
00:14:32.100
renewable programs,
00:14:35.040
fake windmill
00:14:35.940
projects,
00:14:37.120
fake solar
00:14:37.860
projects
00:14:38.460
that produce
00:14:39.040
very little
00:14:39.540
electricity.
00:14:40.160
There will be
00:14:41.500
all kinds
00:14:42.000
of funky
00:14:42.960
new science
00:14:44.080
fiction schemes
00:14:45.020
that don't
00:14:46.400
actually produce
00:14:47.300
energy or output
00:14:48.440
but that are
00:14:49.760
dressed up
00:14:50.340
with all the
00:14:50.760
right public
00:14:51.280
relations.
00:14:52.700
Basically,
00:14:53.500
you know,
00:14:53.940
if you want
00:14:54.340
to sell
00:14:55.280
a pig
00:14:56.060
in Ottawa
00:14:56.760
over the next
00:14:58.360
several months,
00:14:59.460
paint it green
00:15:00.080
and bring it
00:15:01.360
to Ottawa
00:15:01.820
and Justin Trudeau
00:15:02.760
will buy it
00:15:03.240
with Canadian
00:15:03.740
tax dollars.
00:15:05.220
We saw,
00:15:05.740
we've seen this
00:15:06.200
before,
00:15:06.620
of course,
00:15:06.940
in Ontario
00:15:07.480
where they had
00:15:07.980
a Green Energy
00:15:08.560
Act
00:15:08.940
and they
00:15:09.780
were paying
00:15:10.280
90 cents
00:15:11.000
a kilowatt
00:15:11.640
hour
00:15:11.920
for something
00:15:12.900
that was
00:15:13.220
worth 3 cents.
00:15:14.620
So you can
00:15:15.060
imagine going
00:15:15.580
to a grocery
00:15:16.140
store and paying
00:15:16.740
90 cents
00:15:17.380
for an item
00:15:18.020
that's worth
00:15:18.420
3 cents.
00:15:19.000
Well,
00:15:19.140
obviously,
00:15:19.640
you're going
00:15:19.880
to bankrupt
00:15:20.680
yourself pretty
00:15:21.440
quickly and the
00:15:22.020
result was it
00:15:22.700
doubled electricity
00:15:23.540
prices.
00:15:24.320
It created
00:15:25.060
something that
00:15:25.580
the Ontario
00:15:26.600
Association of
00:15:27.500
Food Banks
00:15:27.940
called energy
00:15:29.680
poverty,
00:15:30.660
a phenomenon
00:15:31.200
where poor
00:15:32.260
working class
00:15:32.920
people were
00:15:33.440
literally walking
00:15:34.280
into the food
00:15:34.960
bank with
00:15:36.080
their power
00:15:36.680
bill and saying,
00:15:37.520
I can't keep
00:15:38.940
the lights
00:15:39.300
on and feed
00:15:40.020
myself so I'm
00:15:40.900
going to have
00:15:41.260
to come here
00:15:42.120
for some canned
00:15:42.780
goods.
00:15:44.260
And meanwhile,
00:15:45.640
well-connected
00:15:46.980
Liberal insiders
00:15:48.320
managed to land
00:15:49.700
these monstrous
00:15:50.520
contracts.
00:15:51.780
So you have
00:15:52.200
millionaires on
00:15:53.040
Bay Street
00:15:54.100
making a fortune
00:15:54.980
off of little
00:15:55.660
old ladies
00:15:56.260
who can't afford
00:15:57.020
to turn the
00:15:58.580
lights on in the
00:15:59.280
morning.
00:16:00.020
And this will
00:16:00.660
happen on a
00:16:01.260
grand scale
00:16:02.020
if the Liberals
00:16:03.340
go ahead with
00:16:04.040
the schemes
00:16:04.520
they've been
00:16:05.020
speculating and
00:16:05.840
hinting at in
00:16:07.180
the media over
00:16:07.880
the last several
00:16:08.520
months.
00:16:09.700
You know,
00:16:09.920
it's wild to
00:16:10.640
me, Pierre,
00:16:11.320
that after living
00:16:12.200
through the
00:16:12.660
Green Energy
00:16:13.080
Act and living
00:16:13.740
through McGinty
00:16:14.620
and Wynn and
00:16:15.080
what happened,
00:16:15.660
I mean, I
00:16:15.960
remember there
00:16:16.760
were news
00:16:17.080
stories every
00:16:17.700
week of
00:16:18.340
someone's
00:16:18.960
energy bill
00:16:19.640
where it
00:16:20.220
was like
00:16:20.540
$1,200 a
00:16:21.580
month and
00:16:22.440
there was
00:16:23.060
just nothing
00:16:23.520
that they
00:16:23.800
could do.
00:16:24.220
It was
00:16:24.420
devastating to
00:16:25.200
so many
00:16:25.500
people across
00:16:26.740
Ontario.
00:16:27.840
And at the
00:16:28.420
same time,
00:16:28.880
we were seeing
00:16:29.300
manufacturing plants
00:16:30.380
shut down,
00:16:31.320
the affordability,
00:16:32.900
not able to
00:16:34.040
compete against
00:16:35.540
organizations like
00:16:38.240
manufacturing groups
00:16:39.060
in the United
00:16:39.540
States.
00:16:40.480
How is it that
00:16:41.440
we get ourselves
00:16:43.000
to this place
00:16:43.500
where we're going
00:16:44.020
through it again?
00:16:45.180
How is it that
00:16:46.420
people in Ontario
00:16:47.080
aren't like,
00:16:47.600
hey, wait a
00:16:48.000
minute, I
00:16:48.760
recognize this,
00:16:49.680
I've seen this
00:16:50.240
before, maybe we
00:16:51.800
should be a
00:16:52.660
little bit more
00:16:53.120
cautious before we
00:16:53.900
jump in onto
00:16:55.020
this green planet?
00:16:56.960
I mean, I don't
00:16:57.720
know if you can
00:16:58.100
answer that question,
00:16:58.960
but isn't there
00:17:00.260
prevailing common
00:17:00.980
sense that we've
00:17:01.600
tried this, it
00:17:02.420
failed massively,
00:17:03.600
let's not do it
00:17:04.220
again?
00:17:06.520
Well, the
00:17:07.180
government is
00:17:07.700
making the same
00:17:08.420
mistake all over
00:17:09.320
again.
00:17:09.840
It reminds me of
00:17:10.660
Kipling's poem in
00:17:12.940
which he said that
00:17:13.820
just as the dog
00:17:14.480
returns to its
00:17:15.260
vomit and the
00:17:16.000
sow returns to
00:17:16.920
her mire, the
00:17:17.620
burned fool's
00:17:18.320
bandaged finger
00:17:19.060
goes wobbling
00:17:20.080
back to the
00:17:20.620
fire.
00:17:21.780
You know, we,
00:17:22.280
you're right,
00:17:23.380
we know exactly
00:17:24.440
how this ends.
00:17:25.780
It ends in tears,
00:17:27.580
but it ends,
00:17:29.920
there's a very
00:17:30.580
happy ending for
00:17:31.520
a small group of
00:17:32.260
highly influential
00:17:32.980
people that will
00:17:34.740
dress up their
00:17:35.900
latest scheme as
00:17:38.520
green and they
00:17:40.120
will get monstrous
00:17:41.920
grants and subsidies
00:17:43.140
and handouts from
00:17:44.240
various federal
00:17:44.960
departments.
00:17:46.820
And it will all be
00:17:47.900
called investments,
00:17:50.400
although in the
00:17:51.800
real world, if you
00:17:52.640
have a viable
00:17:53.680
investment, you don't
00:17:54.480
need a government
00:17:55.000
handout because it
00:17:56.080
will pay for itself
00:17:57.020
through its resulting
00:17:57.960
revenues.
00:17:59.220
But again, it
00:18:00.380
will, it will
00:18:01.200
vaporize tens of
00:18:02.620
billions of dollars
00:18:03.460
of hard-earned
00:18:04.160
money and make a
00:18:05.840
very small group of
00:18:06.700
privileged and
00:18:07.280
well-connected people
00:18:08.160
extremely rich.
00:18:09.460
Well, that's, that's
00:18:10.760
the liberal story, I
00:18:11.820
think, in a nutshell.
00:18:13.400
We've been talking a
00:18:14.340
little bit about how
00:18:15.260
Trudeau alienates
00:18:16.360
Western Canadians and
00:18:17.680
how the country is
00:18:19.040
very divided, but we've
00:18:20.240
also seen a rise in
00:18:21.740
separatism, the
00:18:22.840
separatist sentiment
00:18:23.600
over in Quebec, that,
00:18:25.900
you know, the Bloc
00:18:26.860
Quebecois was
00:18:27.380
basically decimated and
00:18:29.400
then hardly won any
00:18:30.260
seats whatsoever in
00:18:31.260
2011, we saw the
00:18:32.520
surge of the NDP over
00:18:34.000
there, but in the
00:18:35.480
last decade, they've
00:18:36.320
sort of creeped back.
00:18:37.460
So maybe you can help
00:18:38.920
us understand, like,
00:18:39.840
what is it about
00:18:40.500
Dustin Trudeau that
00:18:41.900
has led to the rise of
00:18:43.440
a separatist party in
00:18:44.880
Quebec as well?
00:18:47.760
Well, I just think
00:18:48.820
this centralized
00:18:49.820
approach to
00:18:51.040
governance, where you
00:18:52.520
got a big, powerful
00:18:53.540
PMO in Ottawa that
00:18:55.960
runs the economy,
00:18:57.380
and tries to run
00:18:58.600
everybody's lives, is a
00:19:00.620
very divisive force.
00:19:03.060
Ironically, the purpose
00:19:04.600
of it is to pull power
00:19:06.320
inward, but what it does
00:19:07.820
is push people away,
00:19:10.060
because, you know, humans
00:19:11.720
want to have control of
00:19:12.880
their own lives.
00:19:14.200
That's why Quebec has
00:19:15.320
always been focused,
00:19:17.440
rightly so, on protecting
00:19:18.660
its own jurisdiction and
00:19:20.640
keeping the federal
00:19:21.340
government out of its
00:19:22.940
affairs.
00:19:24.020
So in a sense, I think
00:19:25.140
there's a common cause
00:19:26.280
between Albertans, Western
00:19:28.760
Canadians in general, and
00:19:30.180
Quebecers in the desire to
00:19:32.800
keep the federal government
00:19:34.120
out of their backyard and
00:19:35.860
allow people the popular
00:19:39.600
sovereignty over their own
00:19:41.880
local and provincial
00:19:42.900
decisions.
00:19:44.300
So again, in a heartbeat, I
00:19:45.780
think it's a prime minister
00:19:47.340
who is obsessed with
00:19:49.340
controlling people's lives,
00:19:51.140
and there's a similar
00:19:52.420
backlash in Quebec to the
00:19:54.380
kind that we witness in other
00:19:55.980
parts of the country.
00:19:57.260
That's interesting.
00:19:58.360
Okay, let's walk through
00:19:59.700
sort of Justin Trudeau's
00:20:01.180
prime ministership, because,
00:20:03.720
you know, obviously he was
00:20:04.700
sort of swept in.
00:20:05.960
He's a famous guy.
00:20:07.060
He had a famous last name, a
00:20:08.240
famous father.
00:20:08.820
His father, you know, for
00:20:10.720
all the criticism about
00:20:12.220
him, you know, he was a
00:20:14.120
socialist and he destroyed
00:20:15.420
so much of the Canadian
00:20:16.640
economy.
00:20:18.000
But at least he was sort of
00:20:19.360
an accomplished individual.
00:20:20.740
He was a lawyer.
00:20:21.740
He was well-educated.
00:20:23.320
He had, you know, obviously
00:20:25.400
thought a lot about Canada
00:20:27.000
and the kind of country that
00:20:28.240
he wanted to lead.
00:20:30.660
Justin Trudeau, not so much.
00:20:32.900
You know, he sort of came in
00:20:34.580
on this sort of celebrity
00:20:35.920
style, you know, famous guy,
00:20:38.280
charismatic, articulate or
00:20:40.520
whatever.
00:20:42.160
You know, what has the impact
00:20:44.840
of his prime ministership
00:20:45.820
been?
00:20:46.120
He's been in office for about
00:20:47.940
five years now.
00:20:49.740
You know, what has changed
00:20:50.600
over those five years?
00:20:52.660
Well, you know, first of all,
00:20:53.620
it's interesting observation
00:20:54.680
with the left, you know, that
00:20:55.860
the modern left is very
00:20:56.940
elitist and intellectually
00:21:00.100
stuck up.
00:21:01.100
Their whole kind of narrative
00:21:03.700
is that they're smarter than
00:21:05.000
everyone else.
00:21:05.560
That's why they should be
00:21:06.260
running everyone else's
00:21:07.080
life.
00:21:07.400
And they love to denigrate
00:21:10.440
the intellect of conservatives.
00:21:13.540
You know, oh, you must be a
00:21:15.100
simpleton if you think that
00:21:16.300
way, we're told.
00:21:18.940
A knuckle-dragging
00:21:20.720
Neanderthal, as Bill Morneau
00:21:22.900
once said, right?
00:21:24.060
Right, exactly.
00:21:24.940
You must not be very
00:21:25.980
sophisticated.
00:21:26.620
But then they elect this guy
00:21:27.760
who, you know,
00:21:28.900
confuses decimal with
00:21:31.620
decibel, who has a,
00:21:34.420
who is a gaffe machine,
00:21:35.900
who accidentally admits that
00:21:39.140
China is his,
00:21:40.660
the dictatorship in China
00:21:42.000
is his favorite model of
00:21:43.540
governance, who thinks
00:21:44.500
budgets balance themselves.
00:21:45.680
Things that everyone agrees
00:21:46.960
or should agree are utterly
00:21:49.480
ridiculous.
00:21:51.200
And I think that the
00:21:52.300
pathology here on the left
00:21:54.340
is that they'd say, look,
00:21:56.120
you know, he might be a dummy,
00:21:57.320
but he's our dummy.
00:21:58.140
Um, and, um, and ultimately
00:22:01.120
he's not running the country.
00:22:03.340
Uh, other people
00:22:04.660
who share, uh, the agenda
00:22:07.620
of the, of the far left
00:22:09.320
are running it for him.
00:22:10.560
And he's simply a puppet, uh,
00:22:13.240
to, to the Gerald Butts, uh,
00:22:15.120
establishment.
00:22:16.100
And so I think that's why
00:22:17.320
he's been able to, the left,
00:22:19.380
which is so intellectually
00:22:20.580
pretentious, um, is happy to
00:22:23.700
have someone as unsophisticated,
00:22:25.680
uh, as Mr. Trudeau is
00:22:28.380
because they, they know
00:22:29.180
that he's ultimately being
00:22:30.480
run, uh, by those who share
00:22:32.760
the left wing agenda.
00:22:34.480
Um, what is the result of
00:22:36.260
this?
00:22:37.020
Uh, it means that a small
00:22:38.460
group of people are getting
00:22:39.840
richer and power, more
00:22:40.960
powerful, uh, using the state
00:22:43.240
as their instrument.
00:22:45.260
Um, and, uh, they have him,
00:22:48.580
uh, fronting it all, a
00:22:51.000
friendly face, um, a, a
00:22:54.400
handsome, modern, open-looking
00:22:57.100
fellow, um, is sitting at the
00:23:00.180
front of this, this, this
00:23:01.300
whole apparatus, but behind
00:23:02.980
the scenes, uh, a very well,
00:23:05.380
um, a very sophisticated group
00:23:07.420
of insiders is pulling all the
00:23:09.320
levers and running the
00:23:10.240
government to their own profit
00:23:11.720
and to their own benefit and to
00:23:13.160
everyone else's detriment.
00:23:15.280
Well, you, you sort of seeing
00:23:16.320
that now with the, uh, you
00:23:17.960
know, just another scandal.
00:23:19.280
I mean, it seems like scandal
00:23:20.520
on top of scandal with this
00:23:21.500
government, but the idea that
00:23:23.200
the, uh, prime minister's
00:23:24.540
chief of staff's own husband
00:23:26.460
was lobbying the government
00:23:27.700
and ended up walking away
00:23:29.280
with a contract for $84
00:23:31.520
million or something that,
00:23:32.780
that, that, that, that's
00:23:33.380
sort of, you know, to, to,
00:23:34.800
to the Canadian out of work
00:23:36.780
who's lost their small
00:23:37.780
business or something like
00:23:38.720
that, you know, you look at,
00:23:40.440
you look at this sort of
00:23:41.200
insiderness of Ottawa and you
00:23:43.520
kind of just scratch your
00:23:44.760
head and wonder like, you
00:23:46.220
know, what, what, what is
00:23:46.940
this all for?
00:23:47.620
But to me, Pierre, the thing
00:23:49.720
that I worry about and I, I
00:23:51.240
honestly don't know what the
00:23:52.360
answer to this question is,
00:23:53.200
is you look at the deficit.
00:23:54.700
I mean, I, I, I, I, someone
00:23:56.480
who, uh, you know, very opposed
00:23:58.340
running deficits.
00:23:59.100
I think government should be
00:23:59.920
run like businesses or like
00:24:01.680
households and that the idea
00:24:03.440
of even a modest $10 billion
00:24:04.800
deficit isn't good for the
00:24:06.180
country, that, that, that,
00:24:07.580
that even though interest rates
00:24:08.660
are low, you know, we're still
00:24:10.140
paying about 10% of, of total
00:24:12.340
revenue that the government
00:24:13.980
collects just to, you know,
00:24:15.400
service the debt and, and to
00:24:16.880
bondholders, uh, the, the idea
00:24:19.480
of, of, of, of a $400
00:24:21.220
billion deficit is quite
00:24:23.460
frankly, terrifying.
00:24:24.380
And I have no idea how any
00:24:26.180
government would erase that
00:24:28.180
deficit, let alone work
00:24:29.820
towards paying off a trillion
00:24:31.200
dollar debt, uh, that, that
00:24:32.800
the surely will get dumped on
00:24:34.640
the, on the shoulders of our
00:24:36.400
children and our grandchildren.
00:24:38.800
Uh, how is Justin Trudeau even
00:24:42.000
going to continue governing in
00:24:43.600
this fashion?
00:24:44.180
I mean, he's talking about
00:24:45.260
continuing to have, to have a
00:24:46.820
10% of, of GDP, uh, deficit
00:24:50.220
rate, uh, you know, how, how
00:24:52.360
is it even structurally fiscally
00:24:54.240
possible without a massive
00:24:55.940
increase in taxes?
00:24:57.740
Or is, is there something like
00:24:59.000
that coming?
00:24:59.560
Is there, is there a wealth tax
00:25:01.300
coming?
00:25:01.660
Is there a massive increase in
00:25:03.400
taxes?
00:25:03.820
I mean, the top tax rate in
00:25:04.860
Ontario is already over 50%.
00:25:06.580
It's hard to imagine how much
00:25:08.420
higher you can go, but I, I, I
00:25:10.620
just, I just wonder, you
00:25:11.820
know, for you as an elected
00:25:12.920
official and someone who is in,
00:25:14.400
in government, I mean, you're
00:25:15.360
opposition, but you're still
00:25:16.820
representing Canadians, you
00:25:18.980
know, what do you, what do you
00:25:19.960
tell people about the, the, the
00:25:21.680
fiscal situation in Canada right
00:25:23.800
now?
00:25:25.580
Well, let me just share some, some
00:25:27.840
basic facts that are actually
00:25:30.100
quite startling.
00:25:31.220
So the government will say, well,
00:25:32.980
we've got a crisis.
00:25:33.820
The COVID shutdown is the reason
00:25:35.660
we have this monstrous deficit.
00:25:37.240
So let, let's compare the deficit
00:25:39.060
to other crises.
00:25:40.100
In World War One, our debt, our
00:25:43.540
deficit to GDP was 9%.
00:25:47.540
In the Great Depression, it was
00:25:51.620
about 6%.
00:25:52.760
In the Great Recession of 2008-9,
00:25:59.240
it was about three and a half
00:26:01.220
percent.
00:26:02.280
Right now, our deficit sits at
00:26:04.520
around 17% GDP.
00:26:06.640
So in other words, our deficit as
00:26:08.640
a share of our GDP, so this is
00:26:10.200
automatically adjusted for
00:26:11.460
inflation and for the changed
00:26:13.520
size of our economy.
00:26:15.480
Our deficit is now twice what it
00:26:18.640
was in World War One.
00:26:20.760
It is approximately six times what
00:26:25.300
it was during the Great Global
00:26:26.980
Recession.
00:26:28.580
It is three times higher than it
00:26:30.820
was at its peak in 1932 in the
00:26:33.440
Great Depression.
00:26:34.800
The only time we've ever had a
00:26:36.640
deficit this big was back in
00:26:39.040
1943 when we had a 23% of GDP
00:26:42.240
deficit.
00:26:42.980
And that was, of course, right
00:26:43.960
smack in the middle of World War
00:26:46.240
Two.
00:26:46.720
But the difference there, by the
00:26:48.060
way, is that by 1947, Canada was
00:26:51.380
running monstrous surpluses.
00:26:54.180
Our soldiers came home with all of
00:26:56.060
the wages they had earned and
00:26:57.480
weren't allowed to spend.
00:26:58.960
And they spent it in the economy
00:27:00.660
and they bought homes and they
00:27:01.980
built a great generation thereafter
00:27:05.440
and they gave birth to the baby
00:27:06.640
boomers, et cetera.
00:27:07.700
And we had this surge of revenue
00:27:10.580
and the government didn't spend it.
00:27:12.420
In fact, spending went down.
00:27:14.400
And so we paid off huge amounts of
00:27:16.160
debt.
00:27:17.100
We had surpluses of 5% of GDP in
00:27:19.500
1947, which would be like, imagine
00:27:21.740
today if we had $120 billion
00:27:24.120
surplus.
00:27:25.300
That's how big their surpluses were in
00:27:27.100
the post-war period.
00:27:28.320
So yet people say, the liberals say,
00:27:30.140
oh, yeah, but in the war, the
00:27:31.220
deficits were a little bit bigger.
00:27:32.880
Yes, but they paid them off quickly.
00:27:34.700
As soon as the crisis was over, they
00:27:36.880
quickly went back into surplus, paid
00:27:39.720
it off, and we had another 30 years
00:27:42.660
of prosperity as a result.
00:27:44.140
So I'm just giving that as a
00:27:45.380
perspective.
00:27:46.780
So right now, our debt, our debt now,
00:27:50.120
move to the debt, is it's well over a
00:27:53.680
trillion dollars.
00:27:54.460
We've gone from a debt that was a
00:27:56.520
third of our economy, 30% of GDP, to
00:27:59.280
50% in just six months.
00:28:04.040
So 30% of GDP to 50% of GDP in six
00:28:07.760
months.
00:28:08.360
To put that in perspective, we hit a
00:28:10.620
debt wall in Canada in 1996 where the
00:28:13.700
world wouldn't lend us any money
00:28:15.160
anymore, and it was basically a
00:28:17.120
financial collapse.
00:28:18.440
The IMF put up warnings about us.
00:28:21.100
The Wall Street Journal called us a
00:28:22.860
Third World Fiscal Basket Case.
00:28:25.420
That happened when the debt to GDP
00:28:27.180
ratio was 66.6%.
00:28:29.720
So we've eliminated more than half of
00:28:33.560
the buffer between our previous debt
00:28:37.100
level and the maximum debt we can
00:28:40.280
sustain as a government.
00:28:41.340
We've eliminated more than half of that
00:28:43.240
buffer in six months.
00:28:45.260
So I know I'm throwing a lot of
00:28:46.380
information out, but I just want to
00:28:48.400
give a perspective on how truly massive
00:28:51.380
these deficits are.
00:28:52.640
They are orders of magnitude bigger,
00:28:56.520
many orders of magnitude bigger than
00:28:58.220
anything we've seen outside of the
00:29:00.020
World War II period before or after.
00:29:02.600
So what's going to happen?
00:29:04.160
I believe Trudeau will try to get a
00:29:05.820
majority, and once he does that,
00:29:07.800
there'll be massive tax increases.
00:29:09.240
You ask what a wealth tax?
00:29:10.880
That's nothing.
00:29:12.020
The wealth tax raises $6 billion,
00:29:14.440
according to the parliamentary budget
00:29:15.880
officer.
00:29:16.660
They might claim that that's their big
00:29:18.440
solution.
00:29:19.260
We've got a $380 billion deficit.
00:29:21.660
You're not going to get rid of that
00:29:22.520
with a $6 billion tax.
00:29:24.520
They would need massive new income tax,
00:29:28.860
GST increases, business tax increases,
00:29:33.400
increases in every tax you pay in order
00:29:35.920
to keep spending like this.
00:29:37.480
There is no mathematical way to go on
00:29:39.960
doing what we're doing.
00:29:42.520
And the parliamentary budget officer says
00:29:44.880
you don't just have to believe the
00:29:46.400
conservative finance clinic.
00:29:47.760
Just the other day,
00:29:48.520
the parliamentary budget officer said,
00:29:50.200
we've got one, maybe two years like
00:29:53.580
this before we collapse.
00:29:56.240
So it is a crisis situation,
00:29:58.980
and we're the only party that has
00:30:02.040
foretold this problem,
00:30:03.240
and we're the only party that can get
00:30:04.880
the country out of it.
00:30:06.160
Well, you know,
00:30:07.320
it's kind of interesting when you talked
00:30:08.600
about the Second World War, Pierre,
00:30:10.380
because the spending initiatives and the
00:30:12.640
programs that the government would have
00:30:13.860
introduced at the time were by their very
00:30:16.200
nature temporary.
00:30:17.620
You know, the idea was to go and fight a war
00:30:20.020
and stop the Nazis and protect freedom
00:30:22.340
around the world.
00:30:23.640
But what we saw with the Great Recession,
00:30:26.640
or the Great Recession 2008-2009,
00:30:29.920
the Harper government at least tried to make
00:30:32.000
it so that the programs were temporary,
00:30:34.560
that the stimulus spending that they
00:30:36.260
introduced and some of the bailouts
00:30:37.780
were temporary in measure.
00:30:39.500
I think that that's easier said than done.
00:30:41.440
And, you know, certainly what we saw in the
00:30:43.720
United States was just a proliferation of
00:30:45.980
bureaucracy, and that's what tends to happen
00:30:48.400
during these sort of so-called crises when
00:30:50.880
government has to grow to fill the need.
00:30:53.660
So, you know, with the CERB, I mean,
00:30:55.840
first of all, the numbers themselves are
00:30:57.900
incredible.
00:30:58.600
I saw in the Globe and Mail last week that I
00:31:00.640
think that household income during COVID fell
00:31:03.600
by $21 billion, but during the same period,
00:31:06.920
government transfers increased by $54 billion.
00:31:09.580
So Canadians might have hardly even noticed.
00:31:13.080
They actually might have been better off
00:31:14.500
during COVID than they were working, you know,
00:31:17.620
night and day to try to pay the bills.
00:31:19.880
A lot of people have suggested that perhaps
00:31:22.180
it's time for the government to introduce
00:31:24.600
some kind of a universal basic income or
00:31:27.020
to transition that CERB benefit over to a
00:31:30.400
universal income.
00:31:31.600
It doesn't really sound like that's sustainable
00:31:33.540
financially, though.
00:31:35.360
Is there a concern on the Conservative side
00:31:38.420
that a lot of the programs that Trudeau has
00:31:40.380
introduced are permanent?
00:31:42.420
And if a Conservative government were to win,
00:31:45.100
that they would be criticized for, you know,
00:31:47.440
the same vicious line of attacks you get,
00:31:50.080
oh, bringing in austerity and cutting and all
00:31:53.400
these kind of accusations that we see over and
00:31:56.120
over again?
00:31:56.660
Okay, there's a lot in your question.
00:32:00.780
Let me start quickly with your comments
00:32:02.940
on the Harper-era stimulus.
00:32:06.220
So the Economic Action Plan was worked out
00:32:09.420
to about 2% of GDP, and we had a deficit
00:32:13.240
of 3.5% of GDP.
00:32:16.300
So again, right now we're at 17% of GDP in a deficit.
00:32:19.900
So we're just talking orders of magnitude
00:32:23.460
difference, almost six times bigger deficit
00:32:26.920
in relative terms, again, adjusted for inflation
00:32:29.600
and the size of the economy.
00:32:31.200
Secondly, we did lapse those programs.
00:32:33.880
Every single stimulus program we brought in
00:32:36.240
during the Great Global Recession ended in 2011.
00:32:40.580
And we had real reductions, no, not just real,
00:32:43.880
nominal reductions in spending in every single year
00:32:47.620
that followed in the 2012, 13, 14 and 15
00:32:51.240
federal government spending actually went down.
00:32:54.180
And we did that without, by the way,
00:32:55.560
cutting health care or education,
00:32:57.160
both of which went up.
00:32:58.320
So it is possible to manage down the cost
00:33:01.140
of government and relieve taxpayers of their burdens.
00:33:04.960
And finally, one last point, we never once raised taxes
00:33:07.860
in the entire 10-year period.
00:33:09.440
We were in office.
00:33:09.960
So all of these things are possible.
00:33:12.740
Now on the basic income.
00:33:15.320
So we've had, I've had the Parliamentary Budget Officer
00:33:18.100
cost out various models of a basic income.
00:33:22.220
And there is no model that comes in below $73 billion a year.
00:33:28.020
The cheapest model anyone has been able to put forward
00:33:31.560
was Kathleen Wynne's approach,
00:33:33.940
which she did a basic income pilot project in Ontario
00:33:37.620
that would pay an individual $17,400
00:33:41.380
and a couple $24,000.
00:33:45.120
That would be 75% of the poverty rate.
00:33:48.960
So, and it would be phased out at a rate of 50 cents
00:33:51.780
for every dollar a person earned.
00:33:55.360
And so that was the model that she designed.
00:33:57.920
I said, hey, Parliamentary Budget Officer,
00:33:59.560
if we did this federally, how much would that cost?
00:34:01.840
And he said that would be about $73 billion.
00:34:03.700
So that is a lot less generous than the serve, by the way,
00:34:08.120
which is $2,000 per person and $4,000 for a couple.
00:34:13.880
So the high end, we're looking at $200 billion or higher
00:34:18.300
for a program of that nature.
00:34:22.700
So that would be half of the typical budget
00:34:24.440
of the government of Canada.
00:34:25.500
It would be five times what the federal government
00:34:28.080
spends on healthcare transfers.
00:34:29.520
It would be 10 times what we spend on the armed forces.
00:34:33.800
It would be, one last thing,
00:34:37.240
it would be six times what we collect in GST revenues.
00:34:40.760
So there's no one out there that has any explanation
00:34:43.860
of how you pay for it.
00:34:45.100
And the difference between this idea
00:34:47.580
and so many liberal spending ideas
00:34:50.360
is most liberal spending schemes are undesirable.
00:34:54.360
This is mathematically impossible.
00:34:56.860
Unless you're prepared to eliminate
00:35:00.180
whole departments and programs
00:35:03.940
and multiple levels of government
00:35:06.640
to find the fiscal space to pay for it,
00:35:09.580
which nobody is proposing, by the way,
00:35:11.860
then it is mathematically impossible to pay for it.
00:35:15.660
And interestingly, I have not yet heard
00:35:18.640
the liberals openly advocate for a basic income.
00:35:22.080
So it is possible that someone at finance
00:35:24.900
sat them down with a calculator
00:35:26.300
and very slowly walked them through
00:35:28.900
what I just mentioned.
00:35:31.960
But listen, every day I'm shocked.
00:35:35.860
Like, I always knew I was more fiscally conserved
00:35:39.940
than these guys are.
00:35:40.880
But every day it blows me away,
00:35:43.500
the amounts of money they're willing to spend
00:35:45.980
and the things they're willing to spend on.
00:35:48.460
So nothing would surprise me.
00:35:50.720
Well, it's funny because, you know,
00:35:53.380
we just had Bill Morneau as a finance minister
00:35:55.580
for five years.
00:35:57.440
And during that time, you know,
00:35:59.080
we saw a bunch of reckless spending decisions.
00:36:01.020
We saw growth of debt, growth of deficits.
00:36:04.120
We saw, like I mentioned,
00:36:05.580
the top income tax rate in Ontario go above 50%.
00:36:09.420
But now as soon as he's gone,
00:36:11.440
all of a sudden it's like he's being remembered
00:36:13.460
as this like fiscally conservative blue liberal.
00:36:16.540
I don't really remember seeing that very much
00:36:19.100
while he was doing the job.
00:36:21.600
But Pierre, you mentioned that you think
00:36:22.900
that Justin Trudeau is going to try
00:36:25.080
to get a majority government.
00:36:26.560
Do you think with this throne speech coming up here
00:36:29.080
that we are headed into election season?
00:36:31.200
Because it does feel like Trudeau
00:36:32.580
is doing a lot of sort of election style announcements.
00:36:36.120
And it almost seems like they're kicking
00:36:38.200
into election mode here.
00:36:40.020
What do you think?
00:36:41.320
I think he needs an election.
00:36:43.120
And there are, I will say,
00:36:45.840
two reasons why he needs an election quickly.
00:36:49.320
One, he needs an election before the money runs out.
00:36:53.340
As I mentioned, the debt levels
00:36:55.820
and the spending levels are unsustainable.
00:36:58.060
The parliamentary budget officer says
00:36:59.440
he's got one, maybe two years.
00:37:01.420
So he needs the election done
00:37:02.680
before the financial collapse occurs.
00:37:05.140
So that he can run on this fairy tale
00:37:09.100
that money will continue to fall out of the sky
00:37:11.500
and everything's free
00:37:12.580
and we'll just put it on the credit card
00:37:14.440
and we won't ever repay that credit card.
00:37:17.380
And he thinks he can swindle an election victory
00:37:20.280
off of that fantasy one last time.
00:37:23.920
And then the brutal hard truth
00:37:25.240
will kick in a year and a half later,
00:37:27.000
but he won't care because he'll have a majority.
00:37:29.340
So that's the first reason.
00:37:31.680
Second reason he needs an election
00:37:33.280
is because there are some very ugly truths
00:37:37.160
that are being, that he's hiding
00:37:38.900
that will become known soon.
00:37:42.200
One, the ethics commissioner,
00:37:44.980
the lobbying commissioner,
00:37:46.060
potentially the RCMP
00:37:47.220
and the auditor general
00:37:48.480
are all investigating the Wee scandal.
00:37:51.420
That will not only produce guilty verdicts
00:37:53.640
and in the case of the lobbying commissioner,
00:37:56.420
outright criminal charges in some cases
00:37:58.700
for certain people,
00:38:00.560
but it will also produce reports
00:38:03.100
that will show what went on behind the scenes.
00:38:07.000
And I'm sure there's much more there
00:38:09.440
than we know of.
00:38:10.640
The commissioner has the power
00:38:12.180
to call documents and people
00:38:14.040
and it's instruction of justice
00:38:15.880
to lie to the commissioner.
00:38:17.600
So that's going to come out.
00:38:21.020
There is an investigation
00:38:22.500
into the prime minister's chief of staff's spouse
00:38:25.680
lobbying for government contracts
00:38:29.420
and subsidies,
00:38:31.260
lobbying his spouse's office.
00:38:33.840
That is likely to be under investigation,
00:38:36.440
at least by the lobbying commissioner.
00:38:38.980
Finally, the auditor general
00:38:41.760
is investigating what I think
00:38:44.240
is a brewing scandal
00:38:45.420
that no one has noticed,
00:38:46.900
which is that there are 20,000
00:38:48.600
missing infrastructure projects.
00:38:50.900
So the government has said,
00:38:52.040
we have funded 52,000 infrastructure projects.
00:38:54.920
And I said, okay, great.
00:38:56.000
Give us a list.
00:38:57.660
So they gave us a list with 32,000.
00:39:00.780
So we have said,
00:39:01.720
so where's the rest of it?
00:39:03.360
And they say, oh, we can't tell you.
00:39:05.720
You know, so these are secretive.
00:39:07.560
It's impossible to build
00:39:09.060
an infrastructure project in secret.
00:39:11.100
They're big, loud, noisy affairs.
00:39:13.080
There's guys in hard hats and machines.
00:39:15.420
Bumping away.
00:39:17.200
You know, if there's an infrastructure project happening,
00:39:19.240
it's not a secret, right?
00:39:20.340
And there would be a list of where,
00:39:22.160
when, how much it costs
00:39:23.680
to build these projects.
00:39:25.740
But they don't have the list,
00:39:27.220
which means that the money
00:39:28.300
went somewhere it shouldn't have.
00:39:29.720
And the auditor general
00:39:30.560
is looking into exactly that.
00:39:32.560
And I think that report
00:39:33.520
will come out in late spring.
00:39:35.160
Long story short,
00:39:36.860
Trudeau needs an election
00:39:37.960
out of the way
00:39:38.640
before any of this stuff comes out.
00:39:40.560
And that's why I think
00:39:41.360
he's going to push for one in the fall.
00:39:42.700
So you said that
00:39:44.400
that report's coming out late spring.
00:39:46.160
Why is it going to take so long?
00:39:48.760
That's the nature
00:39:49.700
of Auditor general examinations.
00:39:52.740
You know, they have to track
00:39:53.760
billions of dollars of spending.
00:39:57.100
The purported infrastructure spend
00:39:59.280
is something like $9 billion a year.
00:40:01.880
And so the AG has to go
00:40:05.380
through all the departments.
00:40:06.720
These are spread out
00:40:08.000
of all these departments.
00:40:09.220
And in Ottawa,
00:40:10.080
they're also involving the provinces
00:40:11.600
and the municipalities.
00:40:13.020
So it just takes a long time.
00:40:14.920
By the way,
00:40:15.640
the auditor general is underfunded.
00:40:18.280
The AG's office is short
00:40:19.620
about $11 million.
00:40:21.800
So one thing Trudeau
00:40:22.860
doesn't want to spend money on
00:40:23.960
is auditors.
00:40:25.360
It's yes to everything else.
00:40:27.020
He doesn't, you know,
00:40:27.660
doesn't care who you are
00:40:28.700
or what you're asking for money for.
00:40:30.100
The answer is always yes,
00:40:31.560
unless you're an auditor.
00:40:32.740
In which case,
00:40:33.380
the answer is a firm no.
00:40:35.600
The only person in Ottawa
00:40:37.000
who hears that, no.
00:40:40.560
He believes in austerity
00:40:42.080
for one office,
00:40:43.040
the auditor general.
00:40:45.260
Well, okay,
00:40:46.380
so let's talk about the WE scandal
00:40:48.000
because we all watched it
00:40:49.800
with a lot of interest.
00:40:51.500
I feel like you're right
00:40:52.620
that there was a lot of liberal MPs
00:40:55.180
and people that were testifying
00:40:56.400
sort of alluding to the fact like,
00:40:58.480
oh, you know,
00:40:58.860
we were just working so hard
00:41:00.140
and it was so crazy
00:41:01.040
and we're just doing our best
00:41:02.540
to try to help Canadians
00:41:04.880
during this difficult time
00:41:06.000
and sort of setting up the idea
00:41:07.560
that, sure,
00:41:08.420
we didn't do all the due diligence
00:41:10.060
that we probably should have
00:41:11.320
in, you know,
00:41:12.240
shipping $400 billion out the door
00:41:14.360
in just a matter of a few months.
00:41:16.180
But for people who maybe
00:41:18.420
haven't been glued
00:41:19.540
to their computer screens
00:41:21.320
watching parliamentary committee
00:41:23.520
testimonies all summer,
00:41:25.140
Pierre,
00:41:25.240
maybe you can just kind of give us
00:41:26.520
a brief overview
00:41:28.060
of the WE scandal.
00:41:29.460
So tell us what happened,
00:41:30.880
how did it happen,
00:41:31.640
and where are we now?
00:41:33.920
Well, what we know now
00:41:35.200
is that in the early part
00:41:37.380
of the pandemic,
00:41:38.500
early April,
00:41:40.020
the Kielberger brothers
00:41:41.320
began aggressively pitching
00:41:43.960
key decision makers
00:41:46.080
in the cabinet,
00:41:47.900
the staff,
00:41:48.560
and the bureaucracy
00:41:49.420
on this idea
00:41:51.600
of a social entrepreneurship program.
00:41:54.640
This was going to apparently
00:41:56.480
teach young people
00:41:58.200
how to be entrepreneurs
00:42:00.180
in the social sector
00:42:01.540
and, you know,
00:42:03.900
they went around the hill
00:42:05.000
and no one was really interested.
00:42:07.720
But then,
00:42:08.800
and this was going to be
00:42:09.580
a small program,
00:42:10.520
you know,
00:42:10.660
I think it was $20 or $30 million.
00:42:13.440
But little did they know
00:42:14.540
that there was a much bigger price.
00:42:15.920
And so the government said,
00:42:18.740
well,
00:42:18.820
we might not be interested
00:42:19.840
in your social entrepreneurship program,
00:42:21.800
but we've got this way bigger initiative
00:42:23.720
called a paid volunteer program.
00:42:27.460
Of course,
00:42:27.780
that's an oxymoron.
00:42:29.860
If you're a volunteer,
00:42:30.960
you're not paid.
00:42:31.480
If you're paid,
00:42:31.940
you're not a volunteer.
00:42:33.840
But, you know,
00:42:34.680
Orwell warns
00:42:35.920
that whenever there's
00:42:36.920
an abusive language,
00:42:38.300
there are other abuses at work.
00:42:40.600
And so anyway,
00:42:42.180
the WE brothers say,
00:42:44.940
you know,
00:42:45.160
great,
00:42:45.460
forget about this stupid
00:42:46.660
entrepreneur program
00:42:47.720
we had last week.
00:42:49.040
We'll do a paid volunteer program instead.
00:42:52.480
And,
00:42:53.360
you know,
00:42:54.040
we were originally trope
00:42:54.940
by the liberals
00:42:55.560
that the whole thing
00:42:56.220
was cooked up
00:42:56.860
by a bunch of bureaucrats
00:42:58.320
in a Gatineau
00:42:59.860
departmental building.
00:43:02.000
But we learned later
00:43:03.380
that no,
00:43:03.780
no,
00:43:03.880
no,
00:43:03.980
no,
00:43:04.080
it was not cooked up
00:43:04.900
by them at all.
00:43:05.880
It was initiated
00:43:06.620
by Bill Morneau,
00:43:08.180
who had been on
00:43:08.800
an illegal $41,000
00:43:10.440
vacation
00:43:11.760
with the
00:43:12.740
WE brothers.
00:43:13.680
It was cooked up
00:43:15.320
by
00:43:15.680
Vardyf Chagur,
00:43:16.940
who had telephone
00:43:17.940
conversations
00:43:18.620
with Mr.
00:43:19.460
Kielberger
00:43:19.880
and told him
00:43:20.900
to put together
00:43:22.340
a proposal
00:43:23.300
on the subject.
00:43:24.660
It was cooked up
00:43:25.560
by,
00:43:25.940
there were two
00:43:26.560
senior staff,
00:43:27.940
policy advisors
00:43:29.220
in the PMO,
00:43:31.060
one of whom
00:43:31.800
Kielberger
00:43:32.660
credits
00:43:33.580
with having
00:43:34.240
played
00:43:34.840
an important role
00:43:35.840
in designing
00:43:36.500
the whole initiative.
00:43:37.420
So it was cooked up
00:43:39.460
by politicians
00:43:40.200
and their staff.
00:43:41.700
It just so happens,
00:43:42.440
this is the crux
00:43:43.200
of the matter,
00:43:44.060
it just so happens
00:43:44.820
that this is
00:43:46.200
a prime minister
00:43:47.300
whose family
00:43:48.040
had received
00:43:48.600
a half a million
00:43:49.360
dollars from
00:43:50.340
this group.
00:43:51.740
So the group
00:43:52.880
pays the Trudeau
00:43:53.840
family a half million
00:43:54.840
and the Trudeau
00:43:55.480
government pays
00:43:56.260
them a half billion,
00:43:57.420
which is a phenomenal
00:43:58.240
return on investment.
00:44:00.020
They should really
00:44:00.520
be advising
00:44:01.160
Warren Buffett
00:44:01.920
on how to get
00:44:03.480
an ROI
00:44:03.920
because I don't
00:44:05.300
think he's ever
00:44:05.940
produced any kind
00:44:06.860
of return like that.
00:44:08.740
And of course,
00:44:09.740
so here we are now,
00:44:11.440
the matter has been
00:44:12.280
before parliamentary
00:44:13.340
committees that have
00:44:14.100
now been shut down
00:44:15.000
due to Trudeau's
00:44:16.120
prorogation,
00:44:17.380
but worry not,
00:44:18.480
we're going to
00:44:18.880
reconvene those studies.
00:44:20.640
We're also going,
00:44:21.200
we also have
00:44:21.860
investigations by
00:44:23.160
the lobbying commissioner,
00:44:24.920
the ethics commissioner
00:44:27.760
and potentially
00:44:28.460
the RCMP,
00:44:29.360
though they never
00:44:30.020
confirm what
00:44:30.700
they're investigating.
00:44:32.240
The liberals
00:44:33.020
have this weird ability.
00:44:34.060
I mean,
00:44:34.180
I remember during
00:44:34.720
SNC-Lavalin,
00:44:35.580
Gerald Butts
00:44:37.100
resigned and
00:44:37.840
presumably he resigned
00:44:38.940
as an admission
00:44:40.040
of some kind
00:44:40.660
of guilt or
00:44:41.100
responsibility,
00:44:41.640
but during his
00:44:42.860
resignation,
00:44:43.200
he sort of insisted
00:44:44.300
that he had done
00:44:44.860
nothing wrong
00:44:45.540
and lo and behold,
00:44:46.460
a couple months
00:44:46.940
he's back working
00:44:47.780
for Trudeau again.
00:44:49.000
This time around,
00:44:49.580
we saw Bill
00:44:50.360
Morneau resign,
00:44:52.680
but sort of
00:44:54.080
inexplicably,
00:44:54.900
he said that it
00:44:55.760
had nothing to do
00:44:56.620
with this Wee scandal
00:44:57.720
that he was at
00:44:58.660
the center of,
00:44:59.280
that he just
00:44:59.660
happened to have
00:45:01.300
wanted to go
00:45:02.080
pursue an international
00:45:04.080
career with the OECD
00:45:06.620
instead of leading
00:45:08.180
the finances
00:45:09.840
of a G7 country.
00:45:12.160
So at this point,
00:45:13.360
has there been
00:45:14.180
anyone who has
00:45:15.360
taken responsibility
00:45:16.800
on behalf of the liberals?
00:45:18.480
Is there anyone
00:45:19.160
that's admitting blame
00:45:20.100
or are they still
00:45:20.840
insisting that they've
00:45:21.980
done nothing wrong?
00:45:24.660
You know,
00:45:25.160
Trudeau has admitted
00:45:25.940
that he should have
00:45:26.400
refused himself,
00:45:27.200
but I think
00:45:28.440
that's a complete
00:45:29.120
distraction.
00:45:29.880
It suggests that
00:45:30.600
he was a passive
00:45:31.380
player and that
00:45:32.580
something was brought
00:45:33.460
up to his desk
00:45:34.200
and that he should
00:45:34.800
have got up from
00:45:36.220
his desk and
00:45:36.860
walked to the room.
00:45:37.680
In fact,
00:45:38.100
I think he and
00:45:39.320
his team were
00:45:40.700
the ones who
00:45:43.160
initiated it all.
00:45:45.020
So he's cleverly
00:45:47.620
apologizing for
00:45:48.980
the smallest part
00:45:50.340
of the offense
00:45:51.680
while trying to
00:45:53.420
distance himself
00:45:54.940
from the biggest
00:45:55.400
part,
00:45:55.700
which is that he
00:45:56.480
and his staff
00:45:57.220
actively participated
00:45:58.700
to extend a half
00:46:00.300
billion dollars
00:46:01.180
to a group
00:46:01.960
than it paid
00:46:02.860
his family
00:46:03.380
a half a million
00:46:04.100
dollars.
00:46:05.440
It just sort of
00:46:06.700
defies logic
00:46:07.840
as to why
00:46:08.560
they would even
00:46:09.060
want to get
00:46:09.560
involved in this.
00:46:10.200
It seems to me
00:46:10.720
as soon as
00:46:11.880
the decision
00:46:13.460
that the funding
00:46:14.240
proposal became
00:46:15.400
public,
00:46:16.560
it was immediately
00:46:17.840
a scandal.
00:46:18.540
The media
00:46:18.780
immediately said,
00:46:19.520
well,
00:46:19.600
wait a minute,
00:46:20.460
you know,
00:46:20.720
all of these
00:46:21.540
ties to liberals,
00:46:22.700
all of these
00:46:23.100
family ties to
00:46:23.920
Trudeau and
00:46:24.400
Morneau.
00:46:25.360
I mean,
00:46:25.960
you just sort
00:46:26.880
of wonder
00:46:27.280
who's running
00:46:29.080
things at the
00:46:29.980
PMO,
00:46:30.500
who's running
00:46:31.080
things in this
00:46:31.460
government where
00:46:31.900
they wouldn't
00:46:32.580
even acknowledge
00:46:33.400
the appearance
00:46:34.660
of what would
00:46:35.280
obviously be a
00:46:36.320
conflict of interest
00:46:37.020
in trying to
00:46:37.840
ship,
00:46:38.520
like you said,
00:46:39.360
I think it was
00:46:39.900
half a billion
00:46:40.760
dollars in
00:46:42.760
money and then
00:46:44.340
an additional
00:46:44.880
couple hundred
00:46:45.880
million dollars
00:46:46.420
to actually
00:46:47.280
administer this
00:46:48.120
program.
00:46:48.580
So it was
00:46:49.020
912 million
00:46:50.740
dollars total.
00:46:52.340
I mean,
00:46:52.660
did they not see
00:46:53.400
that this was
00:46:53.840
going to be a
00:46:54.440
scandal in the
00:46:55.420
making?
00:46:56.700
No,
00:46:57.180
and I'll tell
00:46:57.540
you why,
00:46:58.140
and the book
00:46:58.800
of Proverbs
00:46:59.420
could tell
00:46:59.880
you why.
00:47:00.860
Pride precedes
00:47:01.700
destruction.
00:47:03.080
Remember,
00:47:03.920
Justin Trudeau
00:47:04.680
was the
00:47:05.140
master of
00:47:05.780
the universe,
00:47:07.280
running the
00:47:08.000
universe from
00:47:09.500
his cottage,
00:47:11.180
from his
00:47:12.420
cottage front
00:47:14.240
steps in
00:47:15.680
April and
00:47:16.460
May.
00:47:17.380
And this is
00:47:18.240
where I think
00:47:18.940
the media should
00:47:20.100
apologize to
00:47:21.020
Justin Trudeau
00:47:21.740
because they
00:47:22.520
filled his
00:47:23.180
head with
00:47:24.040
all this
00:47:24.420
hubris.
00:47:25.880
They were
00:47:26.660
going around
00:47:27.380
Ottawa.
00:47:27.640
It's hard to
00:47:28.100
remember this
00:47:28.600
now, but in
00:47:29.340
April, May,
00:47:30.040
and even June,
00:47:31.200
the media had
00:47:32.020
basically taken
00:47:32.840
the position that
00:47:33.620
no one should
00:47:34.200
be allowed to
00:47:34.740
criticize Justin
00:47:35.660
Trudeau.
00:47:36.180
Here we are in
00:47:36.780
the middle of a
00:47:37.160
pandemic.
00:47:38.040
To criticize him
00:47:39.060
would be to be
00:47:39.540
playing politics
00:47:40.440
and to be
00:47:42.300
putting lives on
00:47:43.320
the line.
00:47:44.440
Anyone who
00:47:45.220
criticizes Trudeau
00:47:46.440
is effectively
00:47:47.440
committing treason
00:47:49.000
and endangering
00:47:49.820
public health.
00:47:51.360
They beat up
00:47:52.120
Andrew Scheer.
00:47:53.160
They said,
00:47:53.560
oh, Scheer wants
00:47:54.380
to bring back
00:47:54.920
parliament.
00:47:55.500
What the hell
00:47:55.860
do we need
00:47:56.220
parliament for?
00:47:57.780
Don't we all
00:47:58.700
realize that now
00:47:59.600
is the time to
00:48:00.300
just gather
00:48:00.860
around the
00:48:01.760
footsteps of
00:48:03.660
Rideau Cottage
00:48:04.720
and let the
00:48:05.200
prime minister
00:48:05.660
come out and
00:48:06.900
bestow wisdom
00:48:08.220
on us daily?
00:48:10.420
And I was
00:48:11.420
regularly attacked.
00:48:12.640
I would go on
00:48:13.280
Twitter and I
00:48:13.840
would tweet
00:48:14.320
something critical
00:48:15.060
and there would
00:48:15.540
be these piranhas
00:48:17.560
in the press
00:48:18.320
gallery would
00:48:18.980
come at me
00:48:19.500
and look at him
00:48:20.700
he's gone off
00:48:21.160
the deep end
00:48:21.680
he's Italian
00:48:22.200
everyone else
00:48:22.920
is rallying
00:48:23.560
around our
00:48:23.960
prime minister
00:48:24.460
now and here
00:48:25.060
you have this
00:48:25.680
black sheep
00:48:27.040
who's out here
00:48:27.800
standing all by
00:48:28.900
himself.
00:48:30.080
And you know
00:48:30.580
what I think
00:48:30.980
he said to
00:48:31.520
himself,
00:48:32.080
I can do
00:48:32.820
anything I want.
00:48:34.380
You know,
00:48:34.720
no one questions
00:48:36.120
anything.
00:48:38.020
It seems that
00:48:38.820
the normal
00:48:39.360
parliamentary
00:48:40.040
accountability
00:48:40.960
mechanisms
00:48:41.720
are obliterated.
00:48:44.560
So I think
00:48:45.080
the group of
00:48:45.600
them around
00:48:46.040
Trudeau said
00:48:46.800
we now have
00:48:48.380
unfettered
00:48:49.100
access to
00:48:49.760
the public
00:48:50.160
first with
00:48:51.120
no scrutiny
00:48:51.800
and anybody
00:48:52.740
who asks us
00:48:53.420
a question
00:48:53.920
about it
00:48:54.380
will simply
00:48:54.940
accuse them
00:48:55.620
of nasty
00:48:56.160
partisanship
00:48:56.840
in the middle
00:48:57.600
of a pandemic
00:48:58.200
and we'll
00:49:00.440
assert our
00:49:00.900
pure motives
00:49:01.540
and we'll
00:49:02.280
do whatever
00:49:02.620
the hell
00:49:02.920
we please.
00:49:03.540
That's what
00:49:03.960
I think
00:49:04.360
that's where
00:49:04.960
I think
00:49:05.300
their headspace
00:49:05.900
was and
00:49:06.780
frankly I think
00:49:07.840
if the media
00:49:08.660
had been doing
00:49:09.220
its job
00:49:09.800
he probably
00:49:10.420
would have
00:49:10.740
been on
00:49:10.960
his toes
00:49:11.500
and he
00:49:11.880
probably
00:49:12.240
wouldn't have
00:49:12.620
been so sloppy
00:49:13.380
into corruption.
00:49:14.660
Well maybe
00:49:15.260
the media
00:49:15.980
is doing a
00:49:16.440
service to
00:49:17.020
Canadians
00:49:17.360
after all
00:49:18.160
then by
00:49:18.620
letting him
00:49:18.980
have his
00:49:19.240
guard down.
00:49:19.880
I totally
00:49:20.660
remember that
00:49:21.160
because I
00:49:21.480
remember a
00:49:22.160
couple columns
00:49:23.460
coming out of
00:49:24.000
the Toronto
00:49:24.320
Star basically
00:49:24.880
saying why
00:49:25.680
do we need
00:49:25.940
question period
00:49:26.640
the government
00:49:28.340
gets held to
00:49:29.500
account every
00:49:30.080
morning by
00:49:30.600
these reporters
00:49:31.260
asking questions
00:49:32.540
and it's like
00:49:33.100
True North did
00:49:33.980
an analysis of
00:49:34.840
those questions
00:49:35.400
that were asked
00:49:35.960
more than half
00:49:36.600
of them were
00:49:36.940
coming from
00:49:37.380
the CBC
00:49:37.960
you know
00:49:38.700
they were
00:49:39.000
positive in
00:49:39.960
nature
00:49:40.180
they weren't
00:49:40.560
asking questions
00:49:41.380
about you know
00:49:42.600
anything that
00:49:43.340
was serious
00:49:43.860
about government
00:49:44.560
it was always
00:49:45.240
like you know
00:49:46.120
hey how was
00:49:46.940
your weekend
00:49:47.340
how are you
00:49:47.800
coping
00:49:48.140
did you get
00:49:48.700
a haircut
00:49:49.100
you know
00:49:49.640
these kind
00:49:50.060
of questions
00:49:50.580
so one
00:49:52.120
last question
00:49:53.640
about the
00:49:54.020
Wiescat
00:49:54.300
it seems like
00:49:54.860
a lot of
00:49:55.260
times with
00:49:55.860
these scandals
00:49:56.680
that the
00:49:57.480
cover up is
00:49:58.100
worse than
00:49:58.560
the crime
00:49:59.020
and I think
00:49:59.820
what we saw
00:50:00.460
right before
00:50:01.060
parliament was
00:50:01.700
probed
00:50:02.540
there was a
00:50:03.380
document dump
00:50:04.060
so I think
00:50:04.580
you got 40
00:50:05.260
or 50,000
00:50:05.920
emails
00:50:06.400
most of them
00:50:07.280
were heavily
00:50:07.700
redacted
00:50:08.380
and you
00:50:08.940
made that
00:50:09.320
point that
00:50:09.960
you know
00:50:10.440
we don't
00:50:11.480
really know
00:50:11.840
what's in
00:50:12.160
these documents
00:50:12.580
but of the
00:50:13.180
things that
00:50:13.540
weren't redacted
00:50:14.280
the timeline
00:50:15.080
kind of came
00:50:15.680
into place
00:50:16.220
and it
00:50:16.460
seemed like
00:50:16.920
there were
00:50:17.260
some major
00:50:17.760
contradictions
00:50:18.540
between what
00:50:19.380
the liberals
00:50:19.840
had said
00:50:20.600
and what
00:50:21.640
really happened
00:50:22.180
particularly
00:50:22.740
your point
00:50:23.680
about how
00:50:24.080
the civil
00:50:24.440
service
00:50:24.760
wasn't
00:50:24.980
really the
00:50:25.240
one
00:50:25.360
recommending
00:50:25.800
it
00:50:26.080
it seemed
00:50:26.720
like it
00:50:27.020
was more
00:50:27.360
something
00:50:27.620
that was
00:50:27.920
led by
00:50:28.260
Minister
00:50:28.720
Chagher
00:50:29.860
but you
00:50:31.220
know
00:50:31.380
part of
00:50:31.980
the issue
00:50:32.460
is that
00:50:33.840
by the time
00:50:34.640
Justin Trudeau
00:50:35.240
came and
00:50:35.820
testified
00:50:36.300
he kind
00:50:37.620
of was
00:50:37.800
giving a
00:50:38.160
different
00:50:38.420
answer
00:50:38.740
than he
00:50:39.060
had been
00:50:39.440
for the
00:50:39.720
previous
00:50:40.080
few weeks
00:50:40.660
all of a
00:50:41.020
sudden
00:50:41.180
he was
00:50:41.620
telling
00:50:42.160
something
00:50:42.980
new
00:50:43.820
and it's
00:50:44.200
like
00:50:44.340
why is
00:50:44.980
the prime
00:50:45.240
minister
00:50:45.400
saying
00:50:45.800
new
00:50:46.180
information
00:50:46.740
now
00:50:47.200
when this
00:50:47.860
has been
00:50:48.200
in the
00:50:48.600
press
00:50:48.940
for a month
00:50:49.900
do you
00:50:51.220
think
00:50:51.480
the liberals
00:50:52.740
were sort
00:50:53.140
of trying
00:50:53.440
to be
00:50:53.700
too cute
00:50:54.240
that if
00:50:54.560
they had
00:50:54.780
come out
00:50:55.240
from the
00:50:55.860
get-go
00:50:56.180
and just
00:50:56.500
explain what
00:50:57.000
would have
00:50:57.220
happened
00:50:57.520
Canadians
00:50:57.940
would have
00:50:58.200
forgiven
00:50:58.460
them
00:50:58.620
but it
00:50:58.860
was because
00:50:59.280
of the
00:50:59.620
evolution
00:51:01.020
of the
00:51:01.620
storyline
00:51:02.080
and the
00:51:02.560
evolution
00:51:02.900
of when
00:51:03.820
did Justin
00:51:04.300
Trudeau
00:51:04.580
find out
00:51:05.040
when did
00:51:05.400
the civil
00:51:05.740
service
00:51:06.080
recommend
00:51:06.460
this
00:51:07.060
contract
00:51:07.860
that that's
00:51:08.820
ultimately
00:51:09.180
what's going
00:51:09.720
to get
00:51:10.580
them in
00:51:10.860
trouble
00:51:11.060
here
00:51:11.400
I think
00:51:12.320
so
00:51:12.640
I mean
00:51:12.980
look
00:51:13.440
the story
00:51:15.100
the truth
00:51:15.680
is ugly
00:51:16.160
in this
00:51:16.520
one
00:51:16.760
I mean
00:51:17.100
whenever
00:51:17.440
you have
00:51:17.900
a prime
00:51:18.900
minister's
00:51:19.480
family
00:51:19.800
getting
00:51:20.100
paid
00:51:20.420
half a
00:51:21.040
million
00:51:21.260
dollars
00:51:21.740
and then
00:51:22.100
he turns
00:51:22.480
around
00:51:22.740
and hands
00:51:23.080
half a
00:51:23.540
billion
00:51:23.800
to the
00:51:24.160
group
00:51:24.440
that paid
00:51:25.680
them
00:51:25.920
you've got
00:51:27.360
a serious
00:51:27.900
scandal
00:51:28.440
potentially a
00:51:29.700
criminal one
00:51:30.260
so there's
00:51:31.120
no doubt
00:51:31.620
they had
00:51:32.020
big trouble
00:51:32.600
based on
00:51:33.620
the facts
00:51:34.120
but you're
00:51:34.520
quite right
00:51:35.120
covering up
00:51:36.560
things that
00:51:37.060
were ultimately
00:51:37.740
going to come
00:51:38.460
out has
00:51:39.340
just made
00:51:39.680
it worse
00:51:40.160
you know
00:51:40.460
you look
00:51:40.760
at Chagher
00:51:41.680
she comes
00:51:43.020
to our
00:51:43.300
committee
00:51:43.640
denies that
00:51:45.400
she ever
00:51:45.780
met with
00:51:46.300
or spoke
00:51:46.980
with the
00:51:47.640
Kielbergers
00:51:48.360
about the
00:51:50.360
Canada Student
00:51:51.300
Service grant
00:51:52.000
and it turns
00:51:52.480
out she
00:51:52.920
did
00:51:53.180
we have
00:51:54.880
the prime
00:51:56.240
minister
00:51:56.600
saying his
00:51:57.380
office wasn't
00:51:58.080
involved in
00:51:58.540
the decision
00:51:58.920
well we have
00:51:59.640
correspondence
00:52:00.180
showing that
00:52:01.020
two of his
00:52:01.540
senior advisors
00:52:02.340
were directly
00:52:03.760
involved
00:52:04.140
one of them
00:52:04.960
helped design
00:52:05.640
the very
00:52:06.040
program that
00:52:06.720
we're talking
00:52:07.200
about
00:52:07.520
you know
00:52:08.640
we have
00:52:09.180
Bill Morneau's
00:52:10.440
office
00:52:11.040
Bill Morneau
00:52:11.760
saying basically
00:52:12.680
oh it had
00:52:13.320
nothing to do
00:52:13.820
with me
00:52:14.140
I was just
00:52:14.740
the minister
00:52:16.280
responsible
00:52:16.980
but it was
00:52:17.620
all the
00:52:17.900
bureaucrats
00:52:18.360
well now we
00:52:18.840
know that
00:52:19.720
by the
00:52:20.180
bureaucrats
00:52:20.740
own internal
00:52:21.360
correspondence
00:52:21.940
that they
00:52:22.400
said that
00:52:23.600
he was
00:52:24.280
that the
00:52:24.780
minister's
00:52:25.280
office was
00:52:25.740
insisting on
00:52:26.440
it and that
00:52:26.780
they were
00:52:27.060
quote besties
00:52:28.180
besties
00:52:29.160
his office
00:52:30.860
was besties
00:52:31.560
with the
00:52:32.000
we brothers
00:52:32.960
and that's
00:52:34.260
a quote
00:52:34.660
you know
00:52:36.160
the bureaucrats
00:52:37.100
who were
00:52:37.340
supposedly
00:52:37.960
enamored with
00:52:39.200
this program
00:52:39.880
called it a
00:52:40.460
quote
00:52:40.740
shit show
00:52:41.780
that's a
00:52:42.460
quote right
00:52:42.940
out of the
00:52:43.300
email
00:52:43.720
correspondence
00:52:44.420
the
00:52:45.760
you know
00:52:46.940
Trudeau
00:52:47.340
said oh
00:52:47.860
the
00:52:48.140
bureaucrats
00:52:48.700
told me
00:52:49.080
there was
00:52:49.420
no other
00:52:50.120
organization
00:52:50.640
with the
00:52:51.040
capacity to
00:52:51.780
run this
00:52:52.640
program
00:52:53.200
except for
00:52:53.980
we
00:52:54.240
well we
00:52:55.220
now have
00:52:55.540
treasury board
00:52:56.140
secretariat
00:52:56.800
bureaucrats
00:52:57.380
who said
00:52:57.720
they didn't
00:52:58.120
believe we
00:52:58.660
could run
00:52:59.180
the program
00:52:59.680
so it's
00:53:00.740
just all
00:53:01.260
of these
00:53:01.660
lies
00:53:02.300
that are
00:53:02.880
so obviously
00:53:03.780
contradictable
00:53:04.820
for which
00:53:05.680
there's
00:53:05.940
documentary
00:53:06.600
evidence
00:53:07.440
I don't
00:53:08.500
even I
00:53:08.860
don't know
00:53:09.220
why they
00:53:09.660
bothered telling
00:53:10.420
all these
00:53:10.820
lies
00:53:11.220
they should
00:53:11.680
have just
00:53:12.040
come out
00:53:12.460
and said
00:53:12.920
from the
00:53:13.280
get-go
00:53:13.720
look
00:53:14.060
we got
00:53:15.600
excited
00:53:16.020
we did
00:53:17.060
something we
00:53:17.540
shouldn't
00:53:17.820
have
00:53:18.220
there was
00:53:18.880
an obvious
00:53:19.260
conflict of
00:53:19.900
interest
00:53:20.300
it was all
00:53:21.200
our fault
00:53:21.720
you know
00:53:23.180
give us a
00:53:23.940
good
00:53:24.120
licking in
00:53:25.180
the press
00:53:25.600
for a
00:53:26.340
week
00:53:26.560
and then
00:53:27.200
we'll try
00:53:27.520
to move
00:53:27.820
on
00:53:28.100
that's
00:53:28.500
I think
00:53:28.860
the better
00:53:29.220
it would
00:53:29.420
have been
00:53:29.600
the better
00:53:29.940
strategy
00:53:30.500
they still
00:53:30.860
would have
00:53:31.020
been a lot
00:53:31.360
of trouble
00:53:31.740
they would
00:53:32.060
have been
00:53:32.260
found guilty
00:53:32.880
but at
00:53:34.660
least there
00:53:35.120
wouldn't be
00:53:35.460
this whole
00:53:35.840
series of
00:53:36.660
lies that
00:53:37.360
have been
00:53:37.600
exposed
00:53:38.240
little by
00:53:39.160
little each
00:53:39.600
day
00:53:39.880
so that
00:53:41.600
leads me to
00:53:42.080
another thought
00:53:43.060
that I have
00:53:43.840
and I hear
00:53:44.380
from a lot
00:53:45.060
of Canadians
00:53:45.520
about this
00:53:46.160
it seems like
00:53:47.480
Justin Trudeau
00:53:48.080
really is above
00:53:48.860
the law
00:53:49.180
he acts like
00:53:49.980
he's above
00:53:50.340
the law
00:53:50.680
he has
00:53:51.040
this sort
00:53:51.300
of arrogance
00:53:51.720
that he is
00:53:52.420
he has
00:53:53.080
repeated
00:53:53.640
ethics
00:53:54.720
violations
00:53:55.340
he repeatedly
00:53:56.160
gets
00:53:57.240
told by the
00:53:58.620
ethics commissioner
00:53:59.300
that he has
00:53:59.780
violated
00:54:00.400
the conflict
00:54:01.200
of interest
00:54:01.720
act
00:54:02.040
and yet
00:54:02.740
there doesn't
00:54:03.720
really seem to
00:54:04.200
be any
00:54:04.560
repercussions
00:54:05.220
he has
00:54:05.800
a slap
00:54:06.120
on the
00:54:06.360
wrist
00:54:06.660
a minor
00:54:07.120
fine
00:54:07.600
even if
00:54:10.180
he is
00:54:10.480
found
00:54:10.720
guilty
00:54:11.060
of
00:54:11.720
violating
00:54:12.360
the
00:54:13.480
conflict
00:54:13.900
of interest
00:54:14.300
act
00:54:14.560
with this
00:54:15.080
we
00:54:15.500
scandal
00:54:16.120
it won't
00:54:18.140
lead to
00:54:18.560
him
00:54:18.760
losing
00:54:19.660
his role
00:54:21.280
as prime
00:54:21.680
minister
00:54:21.940
so what
00:54:22.840
can the
00:54:23.240
government
00:54:23.540
do to
00:54:24.100
hold
00:54:24.560
Trudeau
00:54:25.180
accountable
00:54:25.680
is it
00:54:27.300
creating
00:54:27.760
another
00:54:28.160
set of
00:54:28.680
laws
00:54:29.080
is there
00:54:30.280
anything
00:54:30.580
that can
00:54:31.200
be done
00:54:31.620
to actually
00:54:32.160
stop
00:54:32.640
an
00:54:33.100
individual
00:54:33.480
who is
00:54:33.940
a repeat
00:54:34.640
offender
00:54:35.160
of these
00:54:36.160
acts that
00:54:36.880
are designed
00:54:37.440
to hold
00:54:38.140
these
00:54:38.340
politicians
00:54:38.800
accountable
00:54:39.420
well
00:54:41.360
look I
00:54:42.240
was the
00:54:42.740
parliamentary
00:54:43.100
secretary
00:54:43.620
who passed
00:54:44.380
the
00:54:45.100
accountability
00:54:45.480
act
00:54:45.980
it was my
00:54:46.620
job to
00:54:47.060
take it
00:54:47.420
through
00:54:47.780
committee
00:54:48.660
and through
00:54:49.220
the house
00:54:49.520
of commons
00:54:50.120
in 2006
00:54:51.220
so all of
00:54:51.980
the laws
00:54:52.380
we're talking
00:54:52.920
about right
00:54:53.500
now
00:54:53.740
the lobbying
00:54:54.280
act
00:54:54.640
the conflict
00:54:55.120
of interest
00:54:55.560
act
00:54:55.940
they were
00:54:57.120
all
00:54:57.560
partly my
00:54:58.780
creation
00:54:59.240
and so I
00:55:00.440
support them
00:55:00.980
but here's the
00:55:01.740
thing is you
00:55:02.340
can't at the
00:55:03.640
end of the
00:55:03.920
day you can't
00:55:04.960
replace the
00:55:06.040
what Churchill
00:55:07.400
called the
00:55:07.980
mighty power
00:55:08.960
of a little
00:55:10.200
man walking
00:55:11.340
into a little
00:55:12.060
room with a
00:55:13.280
little piece of
00:55:13.840
paper and putting
00:55:14.940
it in a little
00:55:15.420
box and that
00:55:16.840
of course is the
00:55:17.440
voter
00:55:17.680
the voter has to
00:55:19.600
decide that they're
00:55:20.280
not going to put up
00:55:20.900
with it anymore
00:55:21.520
at the end of the
00:55:23.480
day you can have
00:55:24.880
all of the law
00:55:25.920
enforcement bodies
00:55:26.820
you want coming
00:55:27.780
out and making
00:55:28.540
findings of guilt
00:55:29.660
but if the voter
00:55:30.960
is not going to
00:55:31.960
hold them
00:55:32.380
accountable for
00:55:33.240
it then he
00:55:34.000
is has
00:55:36.360
impunity
00:55:36.820
there is a
00:55:39.120
weird psychology
00:55:40.560
among the
00:55:41.240
political class
00:55:42.060
in Canada
00:55:42.540
that Justin
00:55:44.420
Trudeau is
00:55:44.920
special
00:55:45.300
that yes of
00:55:46.820
course if any
00:55:47.400
other junior
00:55:48.440
candidate had
00:55:49.560
worn blackface
00:55:50.400
they would have
00:55:50.900
been not even
00:55:51.860
been allowed to
00:55:52.380
run the party's
00:55:53.080
ticket let alone
00:55:53.660
lead it
00:55:54.360
that if anyone
00:55:57.280
else had been
00:55:57.820
found guilty of
00:55:59.100
trying to stop
00:56:00.680
a criminal
00:56:01.120
prosecution
00:56:01.720
they'd immediately
00:56:02.660
have to resign
00:56:03.480
from cabinet
00:56:04.120
many have resigned
00:56:04.960
for much less
00:56:05.720
that there would
00:56:08.020
be criminal
00:56:09.100
charges and
00:56:10.420
there should have
00:56:10.940
been criminal
00:56:11.380
charges for
00:56:12.300
taking a
00:56:13.360
$200,000
00:56:14.140
vacation from
00:56:15.340
someone who
00:56:17.140
was at who
00:56:17.880
was successfully
00:56:18.960
lobbying you for
00:56:20.260
a $15 million
00:56:21.460
grant it's right
00:56:22.600
in the criminal
00:56:23.020
code it's I
00:56:23.880
think it's one
00:56:24.220
section 122
00:56:25.240
it's a criminal
00:56:26.200
offense but the
00:56:27.700
RCMP
00:56:28.200
didn't pursue
00:56:29.720
it and I
00:56:31.260
think it's for
00:56:32.260
Justin it's like
00:56:33.280
you know he's
00:56:33.760
the son of a
00:56:34.560
former prime
00:56:35.140
minister and
00:56:36.520
he's youthful and
00:56:37.440
bashful and
00:56:38.600
there's something
00:56:39.660
kind of
00:56:40.800
something there's
00:56:44.120
sort of an
00:56:45.000
instinct to
00:56:45.960
protect and
00:56:46.480
forgive him
00:56:47.200
among the
00:56:48.040
political class
00:56:48.800
that exists for
00:56:49.540
no other
00:56:50.260
political figure
00:56:51.080
in this country
00:56:51.760
and you know
00:56:53.340
I think it
00:56:53.800
would take an
00:56:54.220
actual psychologist
00:56:55.560
to do an
00:56:56.760
examination of
00:56:57.780
how it is
00:56:58.620
that the
00:56:59.700
system has
00:57:00.720
been so
00:57:01.140
forgiving of
00:57:02.560
the many
00:57:03.400
scandals and
00:57:06.980
in some cases
00:57:07.560
crimes that he's
00:57:08.600
committed
00:57:08.880
that's a really
00:57:10.800
interesting
00:57:11.520
perspective I
00:57:12.660
know now I want
00:57:13.320
to interview a
00:57:13.980
psychologist and
00:57:14.780
find out what
00:57:15.600
what's going on
00:57:16.280
I think so I
00:57:17.120
mean there's
00:57:17.580
something there
00:57:18.220
there's something
00:57:18.760
there yeah there
00:57:19.880
is well I do
00:57:20.800
want to ask you a
00:57:21.500
little bit about
00:57:21.960
the 2019
00:57:22.620
election and
00:57:24.140
the new
00:57:24.760
conservative
00:57:25.480
leader Aaron
00:57:26.100
O'Toole so
00:57:26.800
you know to
00:57:28.060
me the
00:57:29.160
conservatives won
00:57:29.880
the 2019
00:57:30.600
election you
00:57:31.360
guys got the
00:57:31.840
popular vote you
00:57:32.660
increase your
00:57:33.220
vote count your
00:57:34.220
seats in every
00:57:35.200
region Andrew
00:57:36.580
Scheer did a
00:57:37.020
hell of a job
00:57:37.480
standing up to
00:57:38.060
a media that
00:57:38.540
was pretty
00:57:38.860
biased against
00:57:40.100
him but the
00:57:42.000
sort of consensus
00:57:42.800
in the media was
00:57:43.900
that the
00:57:44.120
conservatives lost
00:57:44.780
and that Andrew
00:57:45.600
Scheer needed to
00:57:46.140
go and he
00:57:46.640
sort of agreed
00:57:47.500
with that and
00:57:48.020
stepped down
00:57:48.600
from your
00:57:49.720
perspective why
00:57:50.900
do you think
00:57:51.900
that Justin
00:57:52.960
Trudeau got
00:57:53.520
re-elected and
00:57:54.220
why do you
00:57:54.480
think the
00:57:54.700
conservatives
00:57:55.040
failed to
00:57:55.520
ultimately really
00:57:56.820
sort of win in
00:57:57.780
terms of at
00:57:58.420
least getting a
00:57:58.880
minority government
00:57:59.560
well you're
00:58:02.420
quite right
00:58:02.940
I think Andrew
00:58:03.860
Scheer deserves a
00:58:04.540
lot of credit
00:58:05.060
for the successes
00:58:05.820
you enumerated
00:58:06.680
when he became
00:58:07.260
leader no one
00:58:07.960
gave us a hope
00:58:09.340
of even reducing
00:58:11.280
Trudeau to a
00:58:11.960
minority there
00:58:12.460
was a talk that
00:58:13.280
he would have
00:58:13.700
the biggest
00:58:14.040
majority ever
00:58:14.920
after the longest
00:58:16.100
honeymoon ever of
00:58:17.640
any prime
00:58:18.080
minister look he
00:58:20.860
got 33% of the
00:58:22.380
vote it's the
00:58:22.900
lowest share of
00:58:23.800
the vote of any
00:58:24.540
prime minister in
00:58:25.620
Canadian history
00:58:26.420
many prime
00:58:28.560
ministers have been
00:58:29.300
defeated with by
00:58:30.780
getting a larger
00:58:31.480
share of the vote
00:58:32.220
than he got
00:58:32.820
winning it so he
00:58:35.960
had an incredibly
00:58:36.940
efficient distribution
00:58:39.060
of votes I don't
00:58:40.900
think any party in
00:58:42.320
Canadian history has
00:58:43.260
gotten so many
00:58:44.000
seats with so few
00:58:45.080
votes and I don't
00:58:47.140
say that you know
00:58:47.880
as an excuse
00:58:48.660
it's obviously a
00:58:50.720
tribute in part to
00:58:51.680
their strategy and
00:58:52.660
how they allocated
00:58:53.620
the resources but
00:58:55.440
you know this is
00:58:56.520
not a popular
00:58:57.220
prime minister and
00:58:58.880
he returns to
00:59:00.420
office with an
00:59:01.100
extremely weak
00:59:02.120
mandate and but
00:59:05.040
that said no
00:59:06.440
majority prime
00:59:07.380
minister had been
00:59:08.080
defeated after just
00:59:09.980
one term since
00:59:11.320
R.B.
00:59:11.760
Bennett in the
00:59:12.240
middle of the
00:59:12.540
great depression
00:59:13.160
administration so
00:59:14.120
history the math
00:59:16.720
the media and
00:59:17.740
a whole series of
00:59:18.360
other things were
00:59:19.020
against Mr.
00:59:20.380
Scheer at the
00:59:21.120
time and I wish
00:59:23.580
we had done better
00:59:24.220
as does he but I
00:59:26.220
think we can take
00:59:26.840
solace in the fact
00:59:27.660
that we didn't
00:59:28.280
reduce them to a
00:59:29.000
minority and
00:59:29.900
hopefully we can put
00:59:30.880
an end to the
00:59:31.460
government before they
00:59:32.300
do too much damage.
00:59:33.120
So Aaron O'Toole is
00:59:35.820
out to a really
00:59:36.440
good start I would
00:59:37.420
say he's come out
00:59:38.180
strong I would argue
00:59:40.340
that he's probably
00:59:41.040
not as conservative
00:59:42.060
as Andrew Scheer in
00:59:43.020
terms of his social
00:59:43.920
views but he seems
00:59:45.300
like he really has
00:59:46.660
hit a populist
00:59:47.560
note we saw that
00:59:48.240
with his Labour
00:59:48.760
Day message and
00:59:50.080
his new Canada
00:59:51.180
first economic
00:59:52.540
strategy so I was
00:59:54.320
wondering if you
00:59:54.620
could describe the
00:59:55.320
ways that you think
00:59:56.000
that Aaron O'Toole
00:59:56.740
is different than
00:59:57.880
Andrew Scheer and
00:59:58.720
how the sort of
01:00:00.260
strategy would be for
01:00:01.460
Aaron O'Toole to
01:00:02.200
become the next
01:00:02.740
Prime Minister?
01:00:04.820
Well I think Aaron
01:00:06.360
has a lot of
01:00:07.140
strong attributes
01:00:07.860
he's a veteran
01:00:09.540
a businessman
01:00:10.640
he has strong
01:00:12.640
roots in the
01:00:14.060
parts of the
01:00:14.540
country we need
01:00:15.240
to win in order
01:00:16.180
to form a
01:00:16.760
majority government
01:00:17.520
I think you're
01:00:18.740
right he has
01:00:19.540
struck the right
01:00:20.300
tone I've always
01:00:22.360
believed that the
01:00:23.260
free market is the
01:00:25.160
best way to serve
01:00:26.300
the working class
01:00:27.620
and the poor
01:00:28.340
and by contrast
01:00:31.480
we have is
01:00:32.180
government controlled
01:00:33.120
corporatism that
01:00:34.960
enriches those who
01:00:36.120
have the most
01:00:36.720
political influence
01:00:37.640
at the expense of
01:00:38.560
everyone else
01:00:39.180
we can campaign
01:00:41.480
against that and I
01:00:42.420
think it will be
01:00:42.880
very popular and
01:00:43.760
yes populist to do
01:00:45.460
so so I agree with
01:00:47.300
you he's off to a
01:00:48.100
good start and if
01:00:49.400
he can continue with
01:00:50.280
that momentum he'll
01:00:52.220
be the next Prime
01:00:52.880
Minister.
01:00:54.240
One of the
01:00:54.820
interesting things
01:00:55.500
we're seeing again
01:00:56.740
speculation with this
01:00:57.920
throne speech but
01:00:59.060
the idea that the
01:00:59.740
Liberals have moved
01:01:00.420
so far to the left
01:01:01.400
that the NDP doesn't
01:01:02.740
really have a place
01:01:03.560
anymore and you see
01:01:05.280
Jagmeet Singh I mean
01:01:06.380
he was the real
01:01:07.220
loser in the 2019
01:01:08.300
election they just
01:01:09.240
got decimated in
01:01:10.160
Quebec and reduced
01:01:12.280
in British Columbia
01:01:13.280
and a lot of other
01:01:14.320
strongholds it feels
01:01:15.880
like there's not
01:01:16.540
really a lot of room
01:01:17.460
on the political
01:01:18.260
spectrum for Singh at
01:01:19.880
this point and then
01:01:20.720
you have Aaron O'Toole
01:01:21.920
sort of putting forth
01:01:23.320
this Canada first
01:01:24.460
strategy and when I
01:01:26.680
say populist I mean
01:01:27.600
sort of speaking more
01:01:28.860
to working Canadians
01:01:31.060
blue-collar Canadians
01:01:32.060
and people that might
01:01:32.940
traditionally be part
01:01:34.020
of that NDP voting
01:01:36.000
based union members
01:01:37.820
and that kind of
01:01:38.360
thing do you think
01:01:40.020
that that is part of
01:01:40.740
the Conservative
01:01:41.160
strategy is to
01:01:42.220
capture some of
01:01:44.220
those voters that
01:01:45.140
may feel not
01:01:47.240
represented by a
01:01:48.220
sort of cosmopolitan
01:01:49.480
environmentalist NDP
01:01:51.320
movement?
01:01:53.600
Yes and that has
01:01:54.700
been a problem for
01:01:55.540
the NDP for a long
01:01:56.740
time now you'll
01:01:57.700
recall that the NDP
01:01:59.860
used to be very
01:02:00.600
strong in Saskatchewan
01:02:02.180
in rural British
01:02:05.300
Columbia in parts
01:02:08.100
of Manitoba and they
01:02:11.220
lost that because
01:02:12.500
they became an ultra
01:02:14.740
urban white-collar
01:02:17.480
elite socialist party
01:02:21.080
faculty club socialist
01:02:22.360
party and they forgot
01:02:24.960
about working-class people
01:02:26.220
and farmers and so
01:02:28.440
where the roots of the
01:02:29.420
party were among
01:02:30.160
farmers and workers
01:02:31.380
they're now among
01:02:32.720
activists and loudmouths
01:02:36.660
and protesters and
01:02:38.500
people who get paid to
01:02:40.460
go around screaming and
01:02:41.800
hollering and smashing
01:02:42.620
things and theorizing
01:02:44.820
all day and that's not
01:02:46.660
a particularly big market
01:02:47.960
to pursue and that's why
01:02:50.200
I think you see more and
01:02:51.320
more working-class people
01:02:52.480
are attracted to the
01:02:53.700
conservative message and
01:02:56.160
we're winning we win in
01:02:57.500
places like Oshawa and in
01:03:00.660
rural Saskatchewan and in
01:03:04.520
the north in northern
01:03:05.680
Ontario so a lot of mining
01:03:09.820
towns and assembly line
01:03:12.200
constituencies where that
01:03:14.000
you the NDP used to take
01:03:15.800
for granted are now
01:03:16.800
becoming conservative
01:03:17.680
because they see us
01:03:18.700
representing their working
01:03:20.340
class family values
01:03:22.340
interesting so do you
01:03:24.940
have any any predictions
01:03:26.020
for the fall it's going to
01:03:27.200
be an interesting time
01:03:28.780
with throne speech
01:03:30.040
potentially going into an
01:03:31.740
election and and sort of
01:03:33.180
more uncovering things
01:03:34.700
from your committee the
01:03:35.540
finance committee with the
01:03:36.480
we scandal any any
01:03:37.960
predictions for the fall
01:03:38.840
here
01:03:39.120
yeah I think Trudeau is
01:03:43.000
going to do as much
01:03:43.600
do anything he can to get
01:03:44.800
an election if he can't get
01:03:47.000
the proposition parties to
01:03:48.280
vote down his speech from
01:03:49.660
the throne or his fall
01:03:51.680
update then he might just
01:03:53.860
go to the governor general
01:03:55.360
and say I'm calling an
01:03:56.460
election the challenge for
01:03:58.080
him will be that people
01:04:01.100
will say okay why are you
01:04:02.220
calling an election if
01:04:03.060
you've passed your throne
01:04:04.060
speech you passed your
01:04:05.280
update you passed all of
01:04:06.600
your COVID spending what
01:04:08.520
would a majority give you
01:04:09.780
that you don't already
01:04:10.500
have and of course the only
01:04:12.260
answer is it would allow
01:04:13.440
him to lock in power
01:04:15.860
before people find out how
01:04:17.280
broke we are and before
01:04:18.400
the scandals become fully
01:04:19.920
public and that's not a
01:04:21.980
very good justification to
01:04:23.500
ask people for a majority
01:04:24.680
you know please give me a
01:04:26.480
majority so I can cover up
01:04:27.820
scandals liberal scandals
01:04:30.420
I doesn't sound like much
01:04:33.320
of a slogan so I think he's
01:04:35.080
in a he's in a bind and the
01:04:38.100
only thing that can help him
01:04:39.060
is if Jagmeet Singh really
01:04:40.240
jumps in and tries to defeat
01:04:41.560
him which would be irrational
01:04:43.080
for the NDP and we know that
01:04:46.100
might be the reason they do
01:04:47.160
it interesting and then just
01:04:49.280
final question for you
01:04:50.160
Pierre what do you think the
01:04:51.120
biggest challenge for
01:04:52.620
conservatives is conservatives
01:04:54.520
are in this country and in
01:04:56.580
bringing down this Trudeau
01:04:57.620
government well I think the
01:05:01.640
biggest challenge is telling
01:05:03.420
people the warning it's not a
01:05:06.120
fun job but warning people
01:05:07.300
about the fiscal catastrophe
01:05:08.580
that's coming and being you
01:05:11.580
know sounding that alarm before
01:05:14.300
everyone realizes there's a
01:05:15.680
fire you know and people say
01:05:19.140
well why are you pulling the
01:05:20.000
alarm well it's because there's
01:05:21.860
a fire well we don't see the
01:05:23.020
fire yet well believe me it's
01:05:24.880
there and it's coming and
01:05:25.980
you're going to see smoke and
01:05:27.000
flames very soon and so we have
01:05:30.100
to be you know the bad guys who
01:05:31.680
come and explain that things
01:05:33.280
cost money and that we're
01:05:35.160
eventually going to run out of
01:05:36.340
it that is a very difficult job
01:05:39.040
to play at some point what we've
01:05:40.540
indicated and everyone will say
01:05:41.860
oh they were right all along but
01:05:43.080
by then it's too late the damage
01:05:45.920
is already done so that is the
01:05:48.060
biggest challenge but you know
01:05:49.420
we have to be happy warriors and
01:05:50.940
get out there and make the case
01:05:52.040
it's the right thing to do and the
01:05:54.020
country will be better off for us
01:05:55.220
doing it well you you certainly
01:05:57.540
have your work cut out for you
01:05:59.000
especially considering you know
01:06:01.180
all the things we talked about how
01:06:02.320
the sort of media adoring Justin
01:06:05.520
Trudeau and seeing that he can do
01:06:06.760
no wrong and the sort of liberal
01:06:08.700
stronghold that exists in Ottawa but
01:06:10.720
Pia we really appreciate your time
01:06:12.720
thank you so much for coming on
01:06:14.020
and explaining all these concepts
01:06:15.700
to us and help breaking down
01:06:17.480
everything from an insider
01:06:18.940
perspective we really appreciate
01:06:20.120
your time thank you so much for
01:06:21.480
joining the true north speaker
01:06:22.760
series great to be with you thank
01:06:24.660
thank you so much
01:06:31.660
you
01:06:33.660
you
01:06:35.660
you
01:06:37.660
you
01:06:41.660
you
01:06:45.660
you
Link copied!