Juno News - August 10, 2026


Ex-Harper advisor says Conservatives need to STOP fighting and start winning

Mentioned
Canada didn't just open its borders—it stopped setting expectations Why is Mark Carney in Italy right now?

Episode Stats


Length

22 minutes

Words per minute

154.35

Word count

3,543

Sentence count

174

Harmful content

Misogyny

6

sentences flagged

Toxicity

3

sentences flagged

Hate speech

2

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 According to a poll by Nanos Research, there's no obvious challenger among Conservative
00:00:11.120 politicians in Canada to unseat Prime Minister Mark Carney.
00:00:16.160 Canadians were asked which Conservative might defeat the Liberals.
00:00:20.760 Sixteen percent, said former Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
00:00:25.880 Current leader Pierre Pagliav got fifteen percent of the vote.
00:00:29.120 Ontario Premier Doug Ford, meanwhile, sits at 11%.
00:00:33.160 A third of those polls said none can defeat Mark Carney.
00:00:39.000 Meantime, a column in the National Post argues that all the talk of conservative infighting
00:00:44.620 misses the bigger story that the party is messily reinventing itself.
00:00:50.160 That's right. Some analysts say the party is becoming younger in terms of its appeal,
00:00:56.360 particularly to younger men.
00:00:59.120 Pierre Polyev has shaped the conservatives into a very different coalition from the one
00:01:05.240 his predecessors led. What's more often missed amid all the media feasting on squabbling
00:01:11.700 this summer among various party factions is that the conservative party is undergoing
00:01:17.300 the messy process of reinventing itself. Our guest today is a Harper-era conservative,
00:01:24.740 Dimitri Sudas, joining us from Greece. Dimitri is a communications strategist and a former close
00:01:30.860 aide to former Prime Minister Stephen Harper. He was later let go from his role as executive
00:01:37.640 director of the Conservative Party, was involved in a messy breakup with the Conservatives.
00:01:43.700 That was over a decade ago. Are you back in the Conservative fold right now, Dimitri?
00:01:48.760 it depends it depends how you define fold um i i would say that from from a young age um always
00:01:56.800 have been a conservative have always voted conservative have always supported the conservative
00:02:01.500 party have only donated to the conservative party um you know in life you sometimes make personal
00:02:08.580 decisions um that impact your work and and you're absolutely right prime minister harper
00:02:12.920 did ask me to step down in 2015.
00:02:16.360 He was right.
00:02:17.340 I stepped down.
00:02:19.240 But at the end of the day,
00:02:21.480 conservative values are conservative values.
00:02:24.520 Okay.
00:02:25.440 Now you've also been critical of the current leader,
00:02:28.420 Pierre Polyev.
00:02:29.260 You've written about that.
00:02:31.600 Maybe talk a little bit about the current rift.
00:02:34.140 I mean, we're seeing a faction,
00:02:36.840 various factions now.
00:02:39.040 One faction seems to be anti-Polyev,
00:02:42.120 seems to be determined to unseat the current leader. The other one is, according to some,
00:02:49.420 remaking the party. What do you think is going on here? Well, first of all, I'm not in the
00:02:55.360 business of factions. I'm in the business of winning, especially in politics. What I will
00:03:00.960 say, and I think it's important to make this parentheses, I actually supported Mr. Poiliev
00:03:05.620 during his leadership race. I supported Mr. Poiliev during the federal election campaign.
00:03:12.120 I voted Conservative, obviously, in 2025, the same way I did in 2021, in 2019, in 2015.
00:03:19.500 And I can take you all the way back to 2000, where the first time I ever voted was for the Canadian Alliance.
00:03:26.980 Definitely, there is debate.
00:03:29.640 There is a very public conversation.
00:03:31.480 I would call it the summer of Royal Rumble or Summer Slam for the Conservative Party of Canada.
00:03:37.440 But it's healthy to have these conversations, especially after losing four consecutive elections.
00:03:46.180 Okay, I want to quote you something from a column in the National Post today.
00:03:53.200 It says that Pierre Polyev has reshaped the Conservatives into a very different coalition from the one his predecessors led, and one perhaps that you were part of.
00:04:03.180 What's more often missed amid all the media feasting on squabbling this summer
00:04:09.500 among various party factions is that the Conservative Party is undergoing the
00:04:13.920 messy process of reinventing itself. They're talking about appealing to more
00:04:19.080 younger Conservatives, many younger men. We saw Mr. Polyev and the Conservatives
00:04:25.900 get somewhere like 41% of the popular vote. Harper never got that. What do you
00:04:32.040 suppose that's about? So first of all, you're absolutely right. Mr. Poiliev's election result
00:04:40.240 in 2025 was historic. It was the highest percentage in probably three decades. Brian
00:04:48.420 Maloney was probably the last one in the 1980s. But what if he would have gotten 48% and his
00:04:56.420 opponent would have gotten 49%. At the end of the day, it's about winning. It's about forming
00:05:02.000 government in order to implement your agenda, in order to make decisions, in order to take the
00:05:07.120 country in the direction that you deem is the best one. Another element, all political parties
00:05:12.780 evolve. You know, oftentimes people talk about the difference between the progressive Conservative
00:05:19.040 party under Brian Mulroney and because the word progressive was in it it somehow it somehow made
00:05:26.360 it more red Tory if you want to call it I will remind you because history matters that that
00:05:32.240 progressive conservative party there was a debate on capital punishment at the time there was a
00:05:38.800 debate on abortion so I would say the conservative party of Canada of today is much more progressive
00:05:45.280 by those standards than the progressive party in the 1980s all parties evolve and evolution is
00:05:51.720 important and evolution is natural just like the NDP has evolved look where that's gotten them
00:05:57.540 just like the liberal party evolved if you want to call it evolution between December of 2024
00:06:04.580 when they were surely going to lose government and March 2025 when they won a minority government
00:06:13.200 that was a razor thin, almost a majority.
00:06:16.540 I go back to a very basic principle
00:06:19.180 and adding to your coalition is important.
00:06:22.040 In 2004, when Stephen Harper ran for the leadership
00:06:27.160 of the new Conservative Party of Canada,
00:06:29.400 the slogan was one united conservative voice.
00:06:33.440 So if you're making additions to your point,
00:06:36.100 younger Canadians, which is important,
00:06:38.540 who have traditionally either not voted or voted NDP,
00:06:42.680 you can't be making subtractions
00:06:44.620 on the other side of the ledger.
00:06:46.300 You can't be telling people
00:06:47.940 who are conservative-minded
00:06:49.320 if they don't necessarily agree
00:06:52.580 with you on everything
00:06:53.420 that all of a sudden 0.97
00:06:54.600 they're evil liberals 0.96
00:06:55.420 because guess what? 0.97
00:06:56.500 You're going to convince them
00:06:57.800 to not be a part of your coalition.
00:07:00.980 Politics is about making additions,
00:07:02.520 not about making subtractions.
00:07:04.680 So I take you're talking
00:07:05.920 about Polyev here.
00:07:07.300 You feel that he's being too divisive
00:07:09.740 within his own party.
00:07:10.840 Is that what you think is going on?
00:07:12.120 Well let me give you an example. Caroline Elliott who lost the BC conservative leadership race 0.83
00:07:21.480 by 63 votes. She didn't lose by 2000 votes, she didn't lose by a thousand votes,
00:07:26.920 she lost by 63 votes. But let's take that as an example. Miss Elliott endorsed Mr. Polyevre
00:07:35.080 for the leadership race. 0.63
00:07:37.400 Ms. Elliott was actually the only 0.81
00:07:39.520 BC conservative leadership candidate
00:07:42.020 that endorsed Mr. Poilievre
00:07:44.560 prior to the leadership review vote
00:07:47.300 that took place in Calgary
00:07:48.680 in the winter of 2026.
00:07:53.020 So she's endorsed him.
00:07:54.100 She's a full-fledged supporter
00:07:55.920 of Pierre Poilievre all the way.
00:07:58.360 At Calgary Stampede,
00:08:00.120 because of personal animosity
00:08:01.880 between Mr. Poilievre
00:08:03.180 and some of Ms. Elliott's campaign team members
00:08:06.960 went off to talk about liberal lobbyists
00:08:11.320 from Eastern Canada.
00:08:13.020 I ask one simple question, to what end?
00:08:17.060 What was the purpose of that?
00:08:18.840 Was it necessary?
00:08:20.400 Did it add more votes or did it take away votes? 0.63
00:08:23.920 How do you think Ms. Elliott feels today
00:08:25.820 after having endorsed Ms. Poiliev?
00:08:28.420 How do you think Katie Merrifield,
00:08:30.180 who was Mr. Poiliev's Director of Communications, feels?
00:08:32.540 How do you think Anthony Koch, who was also a supporter and the director of communication of Mr. Poiliev's leadership race, how does Ben Woodfinden feel?
00:08:42.360 You know, it's okay to disagree.
00:08:44.800 It's okay to support different leadership candidates.
00:08:47.720 Why weren't conservative MPs allowed to campaign for Ms. Elliott?
00:08:51.120 Why weren't conservative MPs allowed to fundraise for Ms. Elliott, even though she had fully supported Mr. Poiliev?
00:08:58.140 Because of animosity towards one individual.
00:09:01.300 my former colleague and friend, Corey Tanaik.
00:09:05.080 But the difference between Mr. Tanaik and Mr. Poilievre
00:09:08.480 is that Mr. Poilievre is the leader.
00:09:11.080 He's supposed to lead.
00:09:12.960 He's supposed to bring people together.
00:09:15.120 It's okay if people chirp.
00:09:16.800 We had chirping back in the day as well.
00:09:18.760 Not everybody supported Mr. Harper's leadership.
00:09:21.760 We had Belinda Stronick leave, for example. 0.60
00:09:23.820 She crossed the floor to the Liberals.
00:09:25.440 Do you know what we did the day that Ms. Stronick crossed the floor to go to the Liberals?
00:09:28.500 we didn't launch full-fledged attacks calling her a traitor and you know she betrayed the voters
00:09:35.020 you know what we said don't let the door hit you on the way out good luck with everything
00:09:39.180 full disclosure cory is my former boss at sun news um but he's also been attacking
00:09:48.620 here polyev on various podcasts on on cbc wherever he's appeared and i guess well how
00:09:58.120 did this start and you know how do you end it i mean so i guess you could make the case that in
00:10:04.420 the in the case of making that statement about liberal lobbyists from eastern canada he was
00:10:09.720 he appeared to be rubbing cory tonight's face in it i get that argument but you know he's also
00:10:16.420 faced the slings and arrows coming from that direction in the past and so you know we're in
00:10:22.420 a situation here where whoever started it it's now kind of tit for tat but no it's it's not no
00:10:30.820 it's not no no it's not and I'll tell you why uh we're not uh in a schoolyard during lunchtime
00:10:37.040 tit for tat you started it but I'll finish it you're continuing so I will keep going um one
00:10:42.900 person Corey Tanike um is a party member a conservative whether we like it or not Corey
00:10:50.200 is a conservative who may not agree with the current leadership. The other person is supposed
00:10:56.880 to be the prime minister in waiting. Why is he wasting time on Corey Tanaik? Why? Ms. Byrne,
00:11:05.100 for example, another former colleague of mine, went after Erin O'Toole, took down Erin O'Toole 1.00
00:11:11.240 successfully. These are party members. These are longtime conservatives. So what's good
00:11:20.160 for the goose is good for the gander but when you are the leader when you are the prime minister in
00:11:25.080 waiting you ignore that noise you demonstrate you show that not only you're able to lead and to be
00:11:32.020 the best opposition leader this country has ever had you also have to persuade those the rest who
00:11:38.260 didn't vote for you that you're also the prime minister in waiting and that you are a better
00:11:42.920 alternative than what is currently on offering you know politics is simple it's not complicated
00:11:50.720 you gotta it's not just and Mr. Poilievre I'll be very blunt on this probably the hardest working
00:11:56.940 politician I have ever met and I've known Mr. Poilievre since 2002 we've known each other for
00:12:02.720 24 years disclosure just like you disclose Mr. Poilievre and I I would easily say we were friends
00:12:10.220 we were good friends. We used to speak often. Obviously, since I wrote the op-ed a year ago,
00:12:15.560 why did I write that op-ed, by the way, a year ago? A conservative, a basic conservative principle
00:12:21.060 is law and order. What does that mean? It means the police does its work. It lays charges. It
00:12:26.760 goes to court and a judge decides. What, what, I guess what, what bothered me a year ago is,
00:12:33.800 when Mr. Poilievre, number one, criticized the RCMP as an institution. Is the RCMP perfect? No,
00:12:42.220 it is not. Does the RCMP need improvements? Absolutely. But you cannot say that the RCMP
00:12:49.240 is covering up for Justin Trudeau and then to take it a step further and say that Justin Trudeau
00:12:54.440 should have been in jail because of the SNC-Lavalin scandal, because of the Aga Khan scandal.
00:12:59.500 let the police do its work, lay charges, go to court, let a judge decide. So I obviously haven't
00:13:06.920 spoken with Mr. Poiliev for about a year now. What I believe many conservatives want to see
00:13:14.740 is Mr. Poiliev maybe work a little less hard and work a little bit smarter because sometimes
00:13:22.120 working smartly beats working hard all right speaking say as a as a political operative
00:13:29.900 somebody with a lot of experience in communications how would you fix the current situation the
00:13:35.400 current rift between all the various various parties and you know them all you know all the
00:13:40.160 players and you were friends with some of them still are friends and with others what would you
00:13:46.940 do now if you could say get all parties together hammer this out and have a united front heading
00:13:54.300 into the next election so so here's here's the challenge right now sir um you do that kind of
00:14:01.500 stuff when you're 25 points ahead when you're 20 points ahead you do that kind of stuff when you're
00:14:07.900 virtually tied um the challenge right now is that this has been going on for a very long time for
00:14:14.940 no reason to be completely honest with you where was john bear during the last election campaign
00:14:19.900 um sidelined um i i think that all these things could have been avoided and and i do see
00:14:31.260 this new reality that exists you know juno news is is a brand new media organization with the
00:14:36.460 evolution of technology and it's a good thing by the way because canadians need to get information
00:14:41.100 not just from traditional media but there's also just as much on the left than on the right
00:14:49.260 there's there's this new reality that contains half information and plenty of disinformation
00:14:55.500 there's that new element as well uh in in in our public debate these days so the challenge to your
00:15:02.620 question on how do you fix this now um it may be too late to fix it with those people but it also
00:15:11.180 may be irrelevant all i would say is ignore um is it too late to grab a cup of coffee uh with with
00:15:18.540 mr tonight is it too i don't know i i don't know that's that's a question of leadership and the
00:15:24.060 ability to say enough is enough but if some people aren't willing to bury the hatchet the way that
00:15:29.580 miss burn for example was not willing to bury the hatchet with erin o'toole and she wanted to take
00:15:34.060 him down come hell or high water um sometimes just ignoring and and proving demonstrating
00:15:40.940 that not only are you the best leader of the official opposition buddy prime minister and
00:15:44.780 waiting and i'll give you small examples what's the purpose to what end uh of putting out a video
00:15:51.660 talking about the price of hamburgers 30 years ago versus today at a dairy queen
00:15:55.740 What is the purpose of doing a video with a deck of cards to make a point that Mark Carney, which he has, Mark Carney has made concession after concession after concession and has gotten nothing in return.
00:16:08.860 And the point that I make is if you look at the 2025 election campaign platform, and I've said this repeatedly, it is one of the best platforms I have seen on offering from the Conservative Party of Canada, including when we were in government.
00:16:24.360 It is so good that the Liberals have adopted it in part.
00:16:30.500 But it's not just about the content.
00:16:33.760 It's also about the container, i.e. the messenger.
00:16:37.260 So communicating all the points that Mark Carney has made concession after concession after concession.
00:16:43.240 You don't need a video from the leader of the opposition with a deck of cards trying to make an analogy between playing poker.
00:16:50.560 It's too complicated.
00:16:51.840 Keep it simple.
00:16:52.500 but also play the long game you don't need immediate victories mark carney right now has
00:16:58.620 a majority government i'll give you another example sir uh the government of alberta the
00:17:03.520 conservative government of alberta the very conservative premier of alberta daniel smith
00:17:08.740 has signed a memorandum of understanding for finally after 10 years of liberal rule where
00:17:14.860 they wanted to keep natural resources in the ground and and basically away with oil and gas
00:17:20.660 The government of Alberta has signed a memorandum of understanding.
00:17:24.340 It seems to be making progress.
00:17:26.920 Why be so critical about that?
00:17:29.400 Why not give them rope and say, you know what?
00:17:31.500 We would move faster as conservatives, but this is a step in the right direction.
00:17:37.300 Okay.
00:17:38.880 So you're saying he should give a little...
00:17:43.240 No, what I'm saying is like in baseball.
00:17:45.260 Do you play baseball, sir?
00:17:46.720 Yeah.
00:17:47.060 do you do you swing at every pitch you get well if you do you're gonna strike out pretty quickly
00:17:54.620 so sometimes just just let it pass sometimes just let it go you don't need to hit a home run on
00:18:02.900 every single issue pick your issues and sometimes give the government the benefit of the doubt
00:18:08.400 give them rope in 2029 the election will be about are you better off today than what you were four
00:18:15.860 years ago when mark carney told you he will fix everything once canadians answer that question
00:18:22.580 then they will ask another question mark let's let's let's let's play this out for a second
00:18:28.340 2029 is around the corner um and and mark carney hasn't turned the canadian economy around cost of
00:18:34.820 living is still an issue crime is still an issue immigration is still an issue we haven't reduced
00:18:40.020 our economic dependence on the united states a half ass part in the french trade deal with
00:18:45.220 the americans if he hasn't delivered in 2029 then the next question the voter will ask and i'm not
00:18:52.580 talking about the traditional liberal or conservative voter i'm talking about swing voters
00:18:57.140 those that decide who governs and who loses then they will say okay he didn't deliver what's my
00:19:04.100 other option what's the alternative and brian mulroney used to say this mother teresa is not
00:19:09.380 on the ballot so they will compare it to the alternative so mr polyev has two two to three
00:19:15.220 years right now to position himself as a credible viable alternative to govern this country if he
00:19:23.620 does not do that and if even if mr carney prime minister carney does not deliver guess what liberals
00:19:29.700 win again would you support poly of going into the next elect leading the party into the next
00:19:36.260 campaign i'm i'm a conservative sir uh i i vote i have voted conservative for the last 25 years
00:19:44.020 ever from from the first time i was allowed to vote in 2000 i was born in 1979 until 2025
00:19:51.380 um every single federal election i have always cast my ballot for a conservative candidate
00:19:58.340 and what can you tell me about the current attempt to unseat mr poly of his leader
00:20:03.380 well i i again that's noise um ignore the noise focus on your job become the prime minister in
00:20:13.460 waiting not just the most talented opposition leader this country has ever seen um public
00:20:18.700 opinion polls to be fair are not very good right now and it's so easy to say all these pollsters
00:20:24.780 they're bought and paid for well i'm sorry these are the exact same pollsters that were giving
00:20:30.880 Mr. Poiliev a 25-point lead up until Justin Trudeau left. And Mr. Poiliev chose to not
00:20:39.700 carpe diem, seize the day, on becoming the person who will defend Canada against Donald Trump.
00:20:47.860 And let's be clear on this. There is a certain component of the electorate
00:20:52.980 that is willing to give Mr. Trump a pass.
00:20:58.980 I'm not.
00:21:00.620 Mr. Trump threatened to make my country the 51st state
00:21:04.160 and the buck stops there. 0.99
00:21:06.140 The moment that a foreign leader
00:21:07.840 thinks that he will annex my country,
00:21:10.200 I don't, and I'm one of those that, by the way,
00:21:12.860 for Trump version one,
00:21:14.360 when he was first elected president
00:21:16.080 and during the presidential election campaign,
00:21:19.440 I'm on TV in French every single day.
00:21:21.560 I'm on CTV once a week. Up until Donald Trump talked about the 51st state, up until Donald
00:21:29.080 Trump literally declared an economic war against my country, I was giving him the benefit of the
00:21:35.280 doubt. I was on TV saying, well, this is why he's doing this policy, whether it's on the economy,
00:21:41.280 whether it's on the border. I was giving him the benefit of the doubt. The moment that Donald Trump
00:21:47.040 said Canada should be the 51st state, and the moment that Donald Trump decided to declare an
00:21:53.160 economic war on my country, all bets are off. I don't want to hear anything. There's different
00:21:59.340 ways to approach that. And I will never choose a foreign leader who declares an economic war in my
00:22:05.380 country and who says he wants to make my country the 51st state. I will simply never find 0.67
00:22:12.380 justification for anything else that he does. And again, 10 years of Justin Trudeau put Canada
00:22:19.320 in a position of weakness. That is a reality. But it doesn't justify trying to find reasons as to
00:22:28.100 why, well, maybe Donald Trump has a point. He does not have a point. Okay. Thanks for coming
00:22:35.460 on the show. Appreciate it. My pleasure. Thank you, sir. Dimitri Sulas. If you enjoyed this show,
00:22:41.160 consider supporting great independent journalism by becoming a premier member of judo news
00:22:45.800 please go to junonews.com backslash straight up you can find the link below it helps us
00:22:50.520 do what we do thank you so much for tuning in we'll see you next time