Juno News - August 10, 2026


Ex-Harper advisor says Conservatives need to STOP fighting and start winning


Episode Stats


Length

22 minutes

Words per minute

154.35

Word count

3,543

Sentence count

174

Harmful content

Misogyny

6

sentences flagged

Toxicity

3

sentences flagged

Hate speech

2

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 According to a poll by Nanos Research, there's no obvious challenger among Conservative
00:00:11.120 politicians in Canada to unseat Prime Minister Mark Carney.
00:00:16.160 Canadians were asked which Conservative might defeat the Liberals.
00:00:20.760 Sixteen percent, said former Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
00:00:25.880 Current leader Pierre Pagliav got fifteen percent of the vote.
00:00:29.120 Ontario Premier Doug Ford, meanwhile, sits at 11%.
00:00:33.160 A third of those polls said none can defeat Mark Carney.
00:00:39.000 Meantime, a column in the National Post argues that all the talk of conservative infighting
00:00:44.620 misses the bigger story that the party is messily reinventing itself.
00:00:50.160 That's right. Some analysts say the party is becoming younger in terms of its appeal,
00:00:56.360 particularly to younger men.
00:00:59.120 Pierre Polyev has shaped the conservatives into a very different coalition from the one
00:01:05.240 his predecessors led. What's more often missed amid all the media feasting on squabbling
00:01:11.700 this summer among various party factions is that the conservative party is undergoing
00:01:17.300 the messy process of reinventing itself. Our guest today is a Harper-era conservative,
00:01:24.740 Dimitri Sudas, joining us from Greece. Dimitri is a communications strategist and a former close
00:01:30.860 aide to former Prime Minister Stephen Harper. He was later let go from his role as executive
00:01:37.640 director of the Conservative Party, was involved in a messy breakup with the Conservatives.
00:01:43.700 That was over a decade ago. Are you back in the Conservative fold right now, Dimitri?
00:01:48.760 it depends it depends how you define fold um i i would say that from from a young age um always
00:01:56.800 have been a conservative have always voted conservative have always supported the conservative
00:02:01.500 party have only donated to the conservative party um you know in life you sometimes make personal
00:02:08.580 decisions um that impact your work and and you're absolutely right prime minister harper
00:02:12.920 did ask me to step down in 2015.
00:02:16.360 He was right.
00:02:17.340 I stepped down.
00:02:19.240 But at the end of the day,
00:02:21.480 conservative values are conservative values.
00:02:24.520 Okay.
00:02:25.440 Now you've also been critical of the current leader,
00:02:28.420 Pierre Polyev.
00:02:29.260 You've written about that.
00:02:31.600 Maybe talk a little bit about the current rift.
00:02:34.140 I mean, we're seeing a faction,
00:02:36.840 various factions now.
00:02:39.040 One faction seems to be anti-Polyev,
00:02:42.120 seems to be determined to unseat the current leader. The other one is, according to some,
00:02:49.420 remaking the party. What do you think is going on here? Well, first of all, I'm not in the
00:02:55.360 business of factions. I'm in the business of winning, especially in politics. What I will
00:03:00.960 say, and I think it's important to make this parentheses, I actually supported Mr. Poiliev
00:03:05.620 during his leadership race. I supported Mr. Poiliev during the federal election campaign.
00:03:12.120 I voted Conservative, obviously, in 2025, the same way I did in 2021, in 2019, in 2015.
00:03:19.500 And I can take you all the way back to 2000, where the first time I ever voted was for the Canadian Alliance.
00:03:26.980 Definitely, there is debate.
00:03:29.640 There is a very public conversation.
00:03:31.480 I would call it the summer of Royal Rumble or Summer Slam for the Conservative Party of Canada.
00:03:37.440 But it's healthy to have these conversations, especially after losing four consecutive elections.
00:03:46.180 Okay, I want to quote you something from a column in the National Post today.
00:03:53.200 It says that Pierre Polyev has reshaped the Conservatives into a very different coalition from the one his predecessors led, and one perhaps that you were part of.
00:04:03.180 What's more often missed amid all the media feasting on squabbling this summer
00:04:09.500 among various party factions is that the Conservative Party is undergoing the
00:04:13.920 messy process of reinventing itself. They're talking about appealing to more
00:04:19.080 younger Conservatives, many younger men. We saw Mr. Polyev and the Conservatives
00:04:25.900 get somewhere like 41% of the popular vote. Harper never got that. What do you
00:04:32.040 suppose that's about? So first of all, you're absolutely right. Mr. Poiliev's election result
00:04:40.240 in 2025 was historic. It was the highest percentage in probably three decades. Brian
00:04:48.420 Maloney was probably the last one in the 1980s. But what if he would have gotten 48% and his
00:04:56.420 opponent would have gotten 49%. At the end of the day, it's about winning. It's about forming
00:05:02.000 government in order to implement your agenda, in order to make decisions, in order to take the
00:05:07.120 country in the direction that you deem is the best one. Another element, all political parties
00:05:12.780 evolve. You know, oftentimes people talk about the difference between the progressive Conservative
00:05:19.040 party under Brian Mulroney and because the word progressive was in it it somehow it somehow made
00:05:26.360 it more red Tory if you want to call it I will remind you because history matters that that
00:05:32.240 progressive conservative party there was a debate on capital punishment at the time there was a
00:05:38.800 debate on abortion so I would say the conservative party of Canada of today is much more progressive
00:05:45.280 by those standards than the progressive party in the 1980s all parties evolve and evolution is
00:05:51.720 important and evolution is natural just like the NDP has evolved look where that's gotten them
00:05:57.540 just like the liberal party evolved if you want to call it evolution between December of 2024
00:06:04.580 when they were surely going to lose government and March 2025 when they won a minority government
00:06:13.200 that was a razor thin, almost a majority.
00:06:16.540 I go back to a very basic principle
00:06:19.180 and adding to your coalition is important.
00:06:22.040 In 2004, when Stephen Harper ran for the leadership
00:06:27.160 of the new Conservative Party of Canada,
00:06:29.400 the slogan was one united conservative voice.
00:06:33.440 So if you're making additions to your point,
00:06:36.100 younger Canadians, which is important,
00:06:38.540 who have traditionally either not voted or voted NDP,
00:06:42.680 you can't be making subtractions
00:06:44.620 on the other side of the ledger.
00:06:46.300 You can't be telling people
00:06:47.940 who are conservative-minded
00:06:49.320 if they don't necessarily agree
00:06:52.580 with you on everything
00:06:53.420 that all of a sudden 0.97
00:06:54.600 they're evil liberals 0.96
00:06:55.420 because guess what? 0.97
00:06:56.500 You're going to convince them
00:06:57.800 to not be a part of your coalition.
00:07:00.980 Politics is about making additions,
00:07:02.520 not about making subtractions.
00:07:04.680 So I take you're talking
00:07:05.920 about Polyev here.
00:07:07.300 You feel that he's being too divisive
00:07:09.740 within his own party.
00:07:10.840 Is that what you think is going on?
00:07:12.120 Well let me give you an example. Caroline Elliott who lost the BC conservative leadership race 0.83
00:07:21.480 by 63 votes. She didn't lose by 2000 votes, she didn't lose by a thousand votes,
00:07:26.920 she lost by 63 votes. But let's take that as an example. Miss Elliott endorsed Mr. Polyevre
00:07:35.080 for the leadership race. 0.63
00:07:37.400 Ms. Elliott was actually the only 0.81
00:07:39.520 BC conservative leadership candidate
00:07:42.020 that endorsed Mr. Poilievre
00:07:44.560 prior to the leadership review vote
00:07:47.300 that took place in Calgary
00:07:48.680 in the winter of 2026.
00:07:53.020 So she's endorsed him.
00:07:54.100 She's a full-fledged supporter
00:07:55.920 of Pierre Poilievre all the way.
00:07:58.360 At Calgary Stampede,
00:08:00.120 because of personal animosity
00:08:01.880 between Mr. Poilievre
00:08:03.180 and some of Ms. Elliott's campaign team members
00:08:06.960 went off to talk about liberal lobbyists
00:08:11.320 from Eastern Canada.
00:08:13.020 I ask one simple question, to what end?
00:08:17.060 What was the purpose of that?
00:08:18.840 Was it necessary?
00:08:20.400 Did it add more votes or did it take away votes? 0.63
00:08:23.920 How do you think Ms. Elliott feels today
00:08:25.820 after having endorsed Ms. Poiliev?
00:08:28.420 How do you think Katie Merrifield,
00:08:30.180 who was Mr. Poiliev's Director of Communications, feels?
00:08:32.540 How do you think Anthony Koch, who was also a supporter and the director of communication of Mr. Poiliev's leadership race, how does Ben Woodfinden feel?
00:08:42.360 You know, it's okay to disagree.
00:08:44.800 It's okay to support different leadership candidates.
00:08:47.720 Why weren't conservative MPs allowed to campaign for Ms. Elliott?
00:08:51.120 Why weren't conservative MPs allowed to fundraise for Ms. Elliott, even though she had fully supported Mr. Poiliev?
00:08:58.140 Because of animosity towards one individual.
00:09:01.300 my former colleague and friend, Corey Tanaik.
00:09:05.080 But the difference between Mr. Tanaik and Mr. Poilievre
00:09:08.480 is that Mr. Poilievre is the leader.
00:09:11.080 He's supposed to lead.
00:09:12.960 He's supposed to bring people together.
00:09:15.120 It's okay if people chirp.
00:09:16.800 We had chirping back in the day as well.
00:09:18.760 Not everybody supported Mr. Harper's leadership.
00:09:21.760 We had Belinda Stronick leave, for example. 0.60
00:09:23.820 She crossed the floor to the Liberals.
00:09:25.440 Do you know what we did the day that Ms. Stronick crossed the floor to go to the Liberals?
00:09:28.500 we didn't launch full-fledged attacks calling her a traitor and you know she betrayed the voters
00:09:35.020 you know what we said don't let the door hit you on the way out good luck with everything
00:09:39.180 full disclosure cory is my former boss at sun news um but he's also been attacking
00:09:48.620 here polyev on various podcasts on on cbc wherever he's appeared and i guess well how
00:09:58.120 did this start and you know how do you end it i mean so i guess you could make the case that in
00:10:04.420 the in the case of making that statement about liberal lobbyists from eastern canada he was
00:10:09.720 he appeared to be rubbing cory tonight's face in it i get that argument but you know he's also
00:10:16.420 faced the slings and arrows coming from that direction in the past and so you know we're in
00:10:22.420 a situation here where whoever started it it's now kind of tit for tat but no it's it's not no
00:10:30.820 it's not no no it's not and I'll tell you why uh we're not uh in a schoolyard during lunchtime
00:10:37.040 tit for tat you started it but I'll finish it you're continuing so I will keep going um one
00:10:42.900 person Corey Tanike um is a party member a conservative whether we like it or not Corey
00:10:50.200 is a conservative who may not agree with the current leadership. The other person is supposed
00:10:56.880 to be the prime minister in waiting. Why is he wasting time on Corey Tanaik? Why? Ms. Byrne,
00:11:05.100 for example, another former colleague of mine, went after Erin O'Toole, took down Erin O'Toole 1.00
00:11:11.240 successfully. These are party members. These are longtime conservatives. So what's good
00:11:20.160 for the goose is good for the gander but when you are the leader when you are the prime minister in
00:11:25.080 waiting you ignore that noise you demonstrate you show that not only you're able to lead and to be
00:11:32.020 the best opposition leader this country has ever had you also have to persuade those the rest who
00:11:38.260 didn't vote for you that you're also the prime minister in waiting and that you are a better
00:11:42.920 alternative than what is currently on offering you know politics is simple it's not complicated
00:11:50.720 you gotta it's not just and Mr. Poilievre I'll be very blunt on this probably the hardest working
00:11:56.940 politician I have ever met and I've known Mr. Poilievre since 2002 we've known each other for
00:12:02.720 24 years disclosure just like you disclose Mr. Poilievre and I I would easily say we were friends
00:12:10.220 we were good friends. We used to speak often. Obviously, since I wrote the op-ed a year ago,
00:12:15.560 why did I write that op-ed, by the way, a year ago? A conservative, a basic conservative principle
00:12:21.060 is law and order. What does that mean? It means the police does its work. It lays charges. It
00:12:26.760 goes to court and a judge decides. What, what, I guess what, what bothered me a year ago is,
00:12:33.800 when Mr. Poilievre, number one, criticized the RCMP as an institution. Is the RCMP perfect? No,
00:12:42.220 it is not. Does the RCMP need improvements? Absolutely. But you cannot say that the RCMP
00:12:49.240 is covering up for Justin Trudeau and then to take it a step further and say that Justin Trudeau
00:12:54.440 should have been in jail because of the SNC-Lavalin scandal, because of the Aga Khan scandal.
00:12:59.500 let the police do its work, lay charges, go to court, let a judge decide. So I obviously haven't
00:13:06.920 spoken with Mr. Poiliev for about a year now. What I believe many conservatives want to see
00:13:14.740 is Mr. Poiliev maybe work a little less hard and work a little bit smarter because sometimes
00:13:22.120 working smartly beats working hard all right speaking say as a as a political operative
00:13:29.900 somebody with a lot of experience in communications how would you fix the current situation the
00:13:35.400 current rift between all the various various parties and you know them all you know all the
00:13:40.160 players and you were friends with some of them still are friends and with others what would you
00:13:46.940 do now if you could say get all parties together hammer this out and have a united front heading
00:13:54.300 into the next election so so here's here's the challenge right now sir um you do that kind of
00:14:01.500 stuff when you're 25 points ahead when you're 20 points ahead you do that kind of stuff when you're
00:14:07.900 virtually tied um the challenge right now is that this has been going on for a very long time for
00:14:14.940 no reason to be completely honest with you where was john bear during the last election campaign
00:14:19.900 um sidelined um i i think that all these things could have been avoided and and i do see
00:14:31.260 this new reality that exists you know juno news is is a brand new media organization with the
00:14:36.460 evolution of technology and it's a good thing by the way because canadians need to get information
00:14:41.100 not just from traditional media but there's also just as much on the left than on the right
00:14:49.260 there's there's this new reality that contains half information and plenty of disinformation
00:14:55.500 there's that new element as well uh in in in our public debate these days so the challenge to your
00:15:02.620 question on how do you fix this now um it may be too late to fix it with those people but it also
00:15:11.180 may be irrelevant all i would say is ignore um is it too late to grab a cup of coffee uh with with
00:15:18.540 mr tonight is it too i don't know i i don't know that's that's a question of leadership and the
00:15:24.060 ability to say enough is enough but if some people aren't willing to bury the hatchet the way that
00:15:29.580 miss burn for example was not willing to bury the hatchet with erin o'toole and she wanted to take
00:15:34.060 him down come hell or high water um sometimes just ignoring and and proving demonstrating
00:15:40.940 that not only are you the best leader of the official opposition buddy prime minister and
00:15:44.780 waiting and i'll give you small examples what's the purpose to what end uh of putting out a video
00:15:51.660 talking about the price of hamburgers 30 years ago versus today at a dairy queen
00:15:55.740 What is the purpose of doing a video with a deck of cards to make a point that Mark Carney, which he has, Mark Carney has made concession after concession after concession and has gotten nothing in return.
00:16:08.860 And the point that I make is if you look at the 2025 election campaign platform, and I've said this repeatedly, it is one of the best platforms I have seen on offering from the Conservative Party of Canada, including when we were in government.
00:16:24.360 It is so good that the Liberals have adopted it in part.
00:16:30.500 But it's not just about the content.
00:16:33.760 It's also about the container, i.e. the messenger.
00:16:37.260 So communicating all the points that Mark Carney has made concession after concession after concession.
00:16:43.240 You don't need a video from the leader of the opposition with a deck of cards trying to make an analogy between playing poker.
00:16:50.560 It's too complicated.
00:16:51.840 Keep it simple.
00:16:52.500 but also play the long game you don't need immediate victories mark carney right now has
00:16:58.620 a majority government i'll give you another example sir uh the government of alberta the
00:17:03.520 conservative government of alberta the very conservative premier of alberta daniel smith
00:17:08.740 has signed a memorandum of understanding for finally after 10 years of liberal rule where
00:17:14.860 they wanted to keep natural resources in the ground and and basically away with oil and gas
00:17:20.660 The government of Alberta has signed a memorandum of understanding.
00:17:24.340 It seems to be making progress.
00:17:26.920 Why be so critical about that?
00:17:29.400 Why not give them rope and say, you know what?
00:17:31.500 We would move faster as conservatives, but this is a step in the right direction.
00:17:37.300 Okay.
00:17:38.880 So you're saying he should give a little...
00:17:43.240 No, what I'm saying is like in baseball.
00:17:45.260 Do you play baseball, sir?
00:17:46.720 Yeah.
00:17:47.060 do you do you swing at every pitch you get well if you do you're gonna strike out pretty quickly
00:17:54.620 so sometimes just just let it pass sometimes just let it go you don't need to hit a home run on
00:18:02.900 every single issue pick your issues and sometimes give the government the benefit of the doubt
00:18:08.400 give them rope in 2029 the election will be about are you better off today than what you were four
00:18:15.860 years ago when mark carney told you he will fix everything once canadians answer that question
00:18:22.580 then they will ask another question mark let's let's let's let's play this out for a second
00:18:28.340 2029 is around the corner um and and mark carney hasn't turned the canadian economy around cost of
00:18:34.820 living is still an issue crime is still an issue immigration is still an issue we haven't reduced
00:18:40.020 our economic dependence on the united states a half ass part in the french trade deal with
00:18:45.220 the americans if he hasn't delivered in 2029 then the next question the voter will ask and i'm not
00:18:52.580 talking about the traditional liberal or conservative voter i'm talking about swing voters
00:18:57.140 those that decide who governs and who loses then they will say okay he didn't deliver what's my
00:19:04.100 other option what's the alternative and brian mulroney used to say this mother teresa is not
00:19:09.380 on the ballot so they will compare it to the alternative so mr polyev has two two to three
00:19:15.220 years right now to position himself as a credible viable alternative to govern this country if he
00:19:23.620 does not do that and if even if mr carney prime minister carney does not deliver guess what liberals
00:19:29.700 win again would you support poly of going into the next elect leading the party into the next
00:19:36.260 campaign i'm i'm a conservative sir uh i i vote i have voted conservative for the last 25 years
00:19:44.020 ever from from the first time i was allowed to vote in 2000 i was born in 1979 until 2025
00:19:51.380 um every single federal election i have always cast my ballot for a conservative candidate
00:19:58.340 and what can you tell me about the current attempt to unseat mr poly of his leader
00:20:03.380 well i i again that's noise um ignore the noise focus on your job become the prime minister in
00:20:13.460 waiting not just the most talented opposition leader this country has ever seen um public
00:20:18.700 opinion polls to be fair are not very good right now and it's so easy to say all these pollsters
00:20:24.780 they're bought and paid for well i'm sorry these are the exact same pollsters that were giving
00:20:30.880 Mr. Poiliev a 25-point lead up until Justin Trudeau left. And Mr. Poiliev chose to not
00:20:39.700 carpe diem, seize the day, on becoming the person who will defend Canada against Donald Trump.
00:20:47.860 And let's be clear on this. There is a certain component of the electorate
00:20:52.980 that is willing to give Mr. Trump a pass.
00:20:58.980 I'm not.
00:21:00.620 Mr. Trump threatened to make my country the 51st state
00:21:04.160 and the buck stops there. 0.99
00:21:06.140 The moment that a foreign leader
00:21:07.840 thinks that he will annex my country,
00:21:10.200 I don't, and I'm one of those that, by the way,
00:21:12.860 for Trump version one,
00:21:14.360 when he was first elected president
00:21:16.080 and during the presidential election campaign,
00:21:19.440 I'm on TV in French every single day.
00:21:21.560 I'm on CTV once a week. Up until Donald Trump talked about the 51st state, up until Donald
00:21:29.080 Trump literally declared an economic war against my country, I was giving him the benefit of the
00:21:35.280 doubt. I was on TV saying, well, this is why he's doing this policy, whether it's on the economy,
00:21:41.280 whether it's on the border. I was giving him the benefit of the doubt. The moment that Donald Trump
00:21:47.040 said Canada should be the 51st state, and the moment that Donald Trump decided to declare an
00:21:53.160 economic war on my country, all bets are off. I don't want to hear anything. There's different
00:21:59.340 ways to approach that. And I will never choose a foreign leader who declares an economic war in my
00:22:05.380 country and who says he wants to make my country the 51st state. I will simply never find 0.67
00:22:12.380 justification for anything else that he does. And again, 10 years of Justin Trudeau put Canada
00:22:19.320 in a position of weakness. That is a reality. But it doesn't justify trying to find reasons as to
00:22:28.100 why, well, maybe Donald Trump has a point. He does not have a point. Okay. Thanks for coming
00:22:35.460 on the show. Appreciate it. My pleasure. Thank you, sir. Dimitri Sulas. If you enjoyed this show,
00:22:41.160 consider supporting great independent journalism by becoming a premier member of judo news
00:22:45.800 please go to junonews.com backslash straight up you can find the link below it helps us
00:22:50.520 do what we do thank you so much for tuning in we'll see you next time