Juno News - August 10, 2021


Federal government has a 'duty' to listen to Alberta equalization referendum

Topics
Mentioned
Reclaiming our culture Deradicalizing the COVID busybodies

Episode Stats


Length

13 minutes

Words per minute

170.76

Word count

2,315

Sentence count

121

Harmful content

Misogyny

1

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, I speak with Bill Buick, the Executive Director of Fairness Alberta, about the upcoming equalization referendum, and why the federal government has a duty to listen if Albertans vote against equalization in October.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Welcome back to the Andrew Lawton Show.
00:00:10.660 We've spoken a fair bit about the upcoming equalization referendum
00:00:15.080 that Albertans will be able to participate in in October.
00:00:18.560 I spoke about this with Premier Jason Kenney a few weeks back.
00:00:22.360 And one of the big questions is if Albertans decide to vote in favor of this
00:00:27.700 to basically re-evaluate Alberta's relationship with the rest of Canada
00:00:32.020 as it pertains to equalization,
00:00:34.280 does the federal government even have to pay attention to it?
00:00:37.840 There was a great op-ed in the National Post looking at this very question
00:00:42.000 and it said the feds will have a duty to listen if Albertans vote against equalization.
00:00:47.900 This was written by Dr. Bill Buick, the Executive Director of Fairness Alberta,
00:00:52.540 who joins me now.
00:00:53.780 Bill, good to talk to you. Thanks for coming on today.
00:00:55.780 Yeah, my pleasure.
00:00:58.900 So what is the question? Let's start there.
00:01:01.160 What is it that Albertans are actually going to be voting on in October?
00:01:05.740 The question will be asking if Albertans want to remove the section from the Constitution
00:01:12.200 that affirms a principle of making equalization payments.
00:01:18.320 And this is a federal program, not a provincial one.
00:01:22.420 So we get now to the enforceability of it.
00:01:24.800 If Albertans do vote overwhelmingly or even narrowly for this,
00:01:29.340 what does that compel the government to do, if anything, at the federal level?
00:01:33.800 Well, there's some dispute about that.
00:01:35.400 But in the 1998 Supreme Court reference case regarding Quebec secession,
00:01:40.640 they, of course, went further into what secession would entail.
00:01:45.400 But a few times in that judgment, they just sort of affirmed a general principle
00:01:50.080 that if there's a province that's so upset about something in the Constitution,
00:01:55.100 that it's causing enough political consternation in a province that they have a referendum
00:01:59.540 to change the Constitution, that the rest of the country needs to pay attention to that.
00:02:05.480 And the federal government and the other provinces have a duty to engage in discussions,
00:02:11.180 engage in constitutional discussions, it says at one point.
00:02:14.560 And it's just sort of common sense that if you have, you know,
00:02:19.520 any of your partners in Confederation are that upset about something,
00:02:23.320 and they have a referendum where the people's will explicitly says that this isn't just,
00:02:28.220 you know, some politicians trying to score points,
00:02:30.400 or it's not just somebody, yeah, doing political purposes.
00:02:35.680 This is, the people are upset enough that they want some change,
00:02:39.160 that you can't just ignore it, and that you have to engage with the province in good faith
00:02:43.420 and discuss the problem.
00:02:46.420 But you don't have to go along with it.
00:02:49.040 You have to have a discussion.
00:02:50.320 Of course.
00:02:50.640 Is that basically the standard?
00:02:51.840 There's an amending formula for the Constitution,
00:02:53.840 and that this does not in any way meet that threshold of seven provinces and 50%.
00:03:00.720 But it's just a way of, you know, arguably letting off steam,
00:03:05.580 but more importantly, re-engaging with a province that has a real problem
00:03:09.920 and is frustrated and needs something addressed.
00:03:14.120 So it's just kind of common sense that you wouldn't just brush that off
00:03:18.400 in a way that it's probably easier to brush off a political leader
00:03:24.880 who's asking the feds for something.
00:03:28.300 Maybe he's in a different party.
00:03:30.020 Maybe there's other motives going on.
00:03:32.460 But when the people of a province speak up loudly that they need something addressed,
00:03:36.760 the federal government has a duty to address it.
00:03:40.020 And that's actually a very key point,
00:03:42.300 because a few weeks back when Premier Jason Kenney was sitting down with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau,
00:03:47.900 Premier Kenney had put to him the upcoming Alberta Senate elections,
00:03:52.280 which are also going to be in October,
00:03:53.660 and had asked Trudeau to hold off on appointing any senators for Alberta
00:03:58.220 until Albertans could put a candidate forward.
00:04:01.600 And Trudeau basically said, yeah, yeah, that's not how we do things,
00:04:04.260 and gave, to use your words, the brush off there.
00:04:07.500 So in that sense, having an obligation to, no, no, no, you're going to sit down,
00:04:12.460 you're going to talk about this, forces you to respond to it,
00:04:16.220 because then, you know, voters, other premiers, the media can ask you,
00:04:20.720 okay, well, you know, what did he say?
00:04:22.300 What did you say to him?
00:04:23.280 And I think there's an obligation to at least take something out of it
00:04:27.060 if you have to go into that engagement process.
00:04:29.680 Yeah.
00:04:29.860 And another example is the, another sort of thing that critics of this approach point to is,
00:04:37.500 why can't you just bring it up with the premiers at the Council of the Federation?
00:04:40.920 Why can't you just get the work, work through the normal channels?
00:04:44.360 And I would say, well, one, there's about five provinces who receive a lot of their funding from this,
00:04:52.140 or at least a significant chunk that they're not going to want to just, you know, go with,
00:04:56.040 they don't want any negotiations, because they're pretty happy with how things are.
00:04:59.640 But there are five other provinces that are paying into this without getting anything.
00:05:04.380 So you could have a little five-on-five at the premiers conference.
00:05:08.000 But when you look at 2019, the Alberta government did get every single premier to unanimously agree
00:05:16.440 to give Alberta a significant retroactive payment of $5 billion, $6 billion.
00:05:21.140 Because in 2015, Alberta's revenues dropped $8 billion.
00:05:25.700 That's 20% drop in revenues.
00:05:27.740 And so there's this program called fiscal stabilization that is meant to cushion the blow
00:05:33.360 when you have a sudden drop in revenues like that.
00:05:35.500 But it was, it had a 60 per person cap, $60 per person, which meant that Alberta got $250 million
00:05:42.600 on that $8 billion drop, which was about a 3% insurance payment, which is obviously not stabilizing anything.
00:05:50.260 And so partly out of recognition for all that Albertans have contributed to other provinces
00:05:54.600 through our taxes that we pay, which is much more than we get back,
00:05:59.160 the rest of the premiers said, please give Alberta this retroactive, like change the program,
00:06:04.380 which could benefit all of them conceivably, but give Alberta a retroactive payment,
00:06:08.960 which obviously only helps Alberta.
00:06:10.960 And it's pretty unusual, I think, to get every premier to agree to give one province money.
00:06:15.940 I mean, it's easy to get them to all agree to ask the feds to give them all more money.
00:06:20.560 But this was a pretty significant win, and the feds just ignored it.
00:06:25.160 So, I don't know, I mean, part of this is, for those who criticize the process,
00:06:31.360 well, what would you do?
00:06:32.280 Because the status quo isn't good enough.
00:06:34.700 There's a lot of people in Alberta that are getting increasingly frustrated.
00:06:38.940 You know, I put out posts on these topics,
00:06:41.840 and the number of people who are so upset that they want to leave the country
00:06:45.780 that speak up is, you know, troubling.
00:06:49.760 So, we have a serious problem here, and it's not just, you know,
00:06:52.820 it's too easy, I think, for some politicians and groups in Canada
00:06:57.140 to sort of write off Alberta, demonize Alberta, mock Alberta.
00:07:01.760 But that's not going to last much longer before more serious things happen.
00:07:06.680 So, I feel like this referendum is a really good sort of first step in saying,
00:07:11.380 hey, we're not happy, can we get this addressed?
00:07:13.700 Yeah, and I think you are right to point out that chapter in Canada
00:07:19.320 where other provinces had agreed to give Alberta money
00:07:22.560 because that actually reinforces that the equalization formula
00:07:27.100 does not entirely capture the economic realities.
00:07:30.860 And this is still a problem that Alberta is contending with now,
00:07:33.700 where the economic situation in Alberta,
00:07:36.400 which has been hit not just by the pandemic, like many other provinces,
00:07:39.400 but oil and gas related issues as well,
00:07:42.680 it's still not being reflected in the equalization formula.
00:07:46.900 So, even if someone is committed to equalization,
00:07:49.760 surely they should be able to look and say,
00:07:51.400 the way we do this isn't really working right now.
00:07:54.680 Yeah, the equalization, yeah, so there's two things going on here.
00:07:57.900 One is the symbolic attempt to get some recognition
00:08:01.500 for all that Albertans have contributed
00:08:03.320 and how little we've gotten back from the country for decades.
00:08:05.980 But then, you know, so this is an avenue to address that.
00:08:11.500 But equalization is seriously flawed.
00:08:14.460 The provinces since 2015 have come much, much closer together
00:08:19.540 in fiscal capacity is the way they measure
00:08:22.160 the kind of wealth and ability to pay for services.
00:08:26.020 Alberta, Newfoundland, Saskatchewan,
00:08:28.000 we used to lead the country in 2015,
00:08:30.080 and it's really come down with the energy downturn
00:08:33.180 so that the provinces are, it was about a $5,000 gap
00:08:37.000 between the median have and have not.
00:08:38.980 Now it's about $1,600.
00:08:40.640 And when you think of the different costs of services
00:08:42.560 in places like the Maritimes in Quebec
00:08:44.760 versus Ontario and Vancouver and Alberta,
00:08:48.280 that's basically nothing.
00:08:49.460 So the provinces are more close together than ever,
00:08:53.460 which means equalization is less necessary
00:08:55.660 than ever, if at all.
00:08:57.040 You know, I would argue maybe New Brunswick and PEI
00:09:00.340 are far enough below the average
00:09:02.080 that maybe something there would be fair.
00:09:05.120 But Quebec and Ontario are getting increasingly close,
00:09:08.600 especially if you use a factor like the cost of services.
00:09:12.020 So it's less necessary than ever,
00:09:14.020 and yet the payments have grown to $21 billion this year.
00:09:17.820 They're tied to GDP, and they grow every year
00:09:20.300 regardless of the need.
00:09:21.540 And so we've got massive payments going out,
00:09:25.480 at least $10 billion more than what is justified,
00:09:29.340 which means that there's just $10 billion
00:09:31.220 that all Canadians are paying into
00:09:33.460 that are going just to 30% of the country
00:09:36.260 to pay for provincial services.
00:09:38.360 And this is at a time when Alberta is saying,
00:09:40.440 we need more funding for provincial services.
00:09:42.860 Ontario is saying,
00:09:44.280 we need more funding for provincial services.
00:09:46.580 Well, you're paying for provincial services
00:09:49.040 a lot more than you think.
00:09:50.800 It's just that Ottawa is sending those dollars
00:09:52.760 specifically to five provinces.
00:09:56.420 One of the concerns that I've seen from this,
00:09:59.600 and you touched on it a bit earlier
00:10:00.920 when you talked about the independence sentiment,
00:10:02.900 is that a lot of people that think
00:10:04.540 this doesn't go nearly far enough,
00:10:06.500 that think, you know what,
00:10:07.120 the problems are not going to be fixed.
00:10:08.740 They're certainly not going to be fixed now.
00:10:10.280 And it seems like there's a bit of resistance
00:10:12.240 to this referendum that's coming
00:10:14.760 from the other side of it,
00:10:16.700 from the independence.
00:10:17.540 And I'm curious, as someone in Alberta,
00:10:19.960 how much you see that as being a factor here?
00:10:23.680 Yeah, I mean, I understand the frustration.
00:10:27.540 It is frustrating.
00:10:28.660 But at the same time,
00:10:29.600 we're only sort of 11.5% of the country.
00:10:33.500 We have to understand,
00:10:34.920 and we have sort of different interests
00:10:36.400 than a lot of other sections of the country.
00:10:38.920 So there is a sort of systemic issue
00:10:42.960 that we will always have to deal with.
00:10:45.400 And so I do understand why people think
00:10:47.560 it's fruitless and hopeless
00:10:49.540 and we'll never get anywhere near close enough.
00:10:54.120 But from our perspective,
00:10:55.840 is that we need to try.
00:10:57.460 And there isn't really too many groups
00:11:00.640 that have really tried to do what we're doing,
00:11:03.520 which is telling the rest of Canada the facts,
00:11:06.560 saying, here's how much Albertans have been contributing.
00:11:09.900 Here's how vital Alberta's economy
00:11:11.760 and economic prosperity has been
00:11:13.600 to the rest of the country.
00:11:14.940 Here's all the spillover effects
00:11:17.260 when it comes to either taxes or jobs
00:11:19.380 that the rest of the country benefits from.
00:11:21.560 And just try to shift the perspective
00:11:24.280 for the rest of the country
00:11:26.140 from thinking that somehow Alberta's lucky
00:11:29.240 and has a bunch of free money
00:11:31.380 and that somehow their success comes at our expense
00:11:34.400 and say, no, Alberta's energy sector
00:11:37.200 is a huge source of productivity.
00:11:41.240 And when it's functioning well,
00:11:43.240 the spillover effects
00:11:44.360 for the rest of the country are enormous.
00:11:46.480 And so, you know, get people to realize
00:11:49.180 that a good Alberta is really good
00:11:51.140 for the whole country
00:11:51.880 and that the country needs that prosperity
00:11:53.720 right now more than ever
00:11:54.760 as we try to come out of this COVID mess.
00:11:56.800 And so we're going to do a good faith exercise here
00:12:00.020 and we'll see where that can get us.
00:12:02.980 Bill Buick, Executive Director of Fairness Alberta.
00:12:06.200 Great op-ed in the National Post
00:12:08.260 called,
00:12:09.440 If Albertans vote against equalization,
00:12:11.580 the feds will have a duty to listen.
00:12:14.320 Bill, thanks so much for coming on.
00:12:15.720 Great to talk to you.
00:12:16.140 Yeah, my pleasure, Andrew.
00:12:17.100 And it's a pretty critical time
00:12:18.540 in the next few months here.
00:12:19.600 So I encourage people to go to fairnessalberta.ca
00:12:22.700 and see the information we're providing.
00:12:24.760 And we can only function
00:12:26.740 on the generosity of donors.
00:12:28.840 So please consider a donation
00:12:30.320 if you like what we're doing.
00:12:32.780 Perfect. Thanks very much.
00:12:34.060 Thank you, Andrew.
00:12:35.800 That was Bill Buick of Fairness Alberta.
00:12:38.860 We've obviously been covering Alberta independence
00:12:41.300 because no one else in the mainstream media
00:12:44.100 is in any substantive way.
00:12:45.880 And when they do,
00:12:46.980 it's oftentimes through the lens of,
00:12:49.140 oh, look at these, you know,
00:12:50.120 disgruntled hillbillies,
00:12:51.160 not realizing the very real concerns
00:12:53.120 and very longstanding concerns
00:12:55.160 that people in the West have.
00:12:56.980 And it isn't just about Alberta.
00:12:58.480 It's about a province's ability,
00:13:00.540 a province's right to assert its own agenda.
00:13:03.720 And it's interesting that we have
00:13:05.000 all of these politicians
00:13:06.040 that will tiptoe around Quebec,
00:13:08.280 refuse to tell Quebec no.
00:13:10.400 But when Alberta tries to do the same thing, 1.00
00:13:13.420 in fact, not even the same thing,
00:13:15.360 a pared back,
00:13:16.360 a pared down version of it,
00:13:18.100 it gets mocked and vilified.
00:13:19.980 So that's why we're standing up
00:13:21.220 and I hope you'll continue to
00:13:22.600 as we head towards the referendum in October.
00:13:25.840 Thanks for listening to The Andrew Lawton Show.
00:13:28.180 Support the program by donating to True North
00:13:30.240 at www.tnc.news.