Federal government has a 'duty' to listen to Alberta equalization referendum
Episode Stats
Words per minute
170.7605
Harmful content
Misogyny
1
sentences flagged
Summary
In this episode, I speak with Bill Buick, the Executive Director of Fairness Alberta, about the upcoming equalization referendum, and why the federal government has a duty to listen if Albertans vote against equalization in October.
Transcript
00:00:10.660
We've spoken a fair bit about the upcoming equalization referendum
00:00:15.080
that Albertans will be able to participate in in October.
00:00:18.560
I spoke about this with Premier Jason Kenney a few weeks back.
00:00:22.360
And one of the big questions is if Albertans decide to vote in favor of this
00:00:27.700
to basically re-evaluate Alberta's relationship with the rest of Canada
00:00:34.280
does the federal government even have to pay attention to it?
00:00:37.840
There was a great op-ed in the National Post looking at this very question
00:00:42.000
and it said the feds will have a duty to listen if Albertans vote against equalization.
00:00:47.900
This was written by Dr. Bill Buick, the Executive Director of Fairness Alberta,
00:00:53.780
Bill, good to talk to you. Thanks for coming on today.
00:01:01.160
What is it that Albertans are actually going to be voting on in October?
00:01:05.740
The question will be asking if Albertans want to remove the section from the Constitution
00:01:12.200
that affirms a principle of making equalization payments.
00:01:18.320
And this is a federal program, not a provincial one.
00:01:24.800
If Albertans do vote overwhelmingly or even narrowly for this,
00:01:29.340
what does that compel the government to do, if anything, at the federal level?
00:01:35.400
But in the 1998 Supreme Court reference case regarding Quebec secession,
00:01:40.640
they, of course, went further into what secession would entail.
00:01:45.400
But a few times in that judgment, they just sort of affirmed a general principle
00:01:50.080
that if there's a province that's so upset about something in the Constitution,
00:01:55.100
that it's causing enough political consternation in a province that they have a referendum
00:01:59.540
to change the Constitution, that the rest of the country needs to pay attention to that.
00:02:05.480
And the federal government and the other provinces have a duty to engage in discussions,
00:02:11.180
engage in constitutional discussions, it says at one point.
00:02:14.560
And it's just sort of common sense that if you have, you know,
00:02:19.520
any of your partners in Confederation are that upset about something,
00:02:23.320
and they have a referendum where the people's will explicitly says that this isn't just,
00:02:28.220
you know, some politicians trying to score points,
00:02:30.400
or it's not just somebody, yeah, doing political purposes.
00:02:35.680
This is, the people are upset enough that they want some change,
00:02:39.160
that you can't just ignore it, and that you have to engage with the province in good faith
00:02:51.840
There's an amending formula for the Constitution,
00:02:53.840
and that this does not in any way meet that threshold of seven provinces and 50%.
00:03:00.720
But it's just a way of, you know, arguably letting off steam,
00:03:05.580
but more importantly, re-engaging with a province that has a real problem
00:03:09.920
and is frustrated and needs something addressed.
00:03:14.120
So it's just kind of common sense that you wouldn't just brush that off
00:03:18.400
in a way that it's probably easier to brush off a political leader
00:03:32.460
But when the people of a province speak up loudly that they need something addressed,
00:03:36.760
the federal government has a duty to address it.
00:03:42.300
because a few weeks back when Premier Jason Kenney was sitting down with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau,
00:03:47.900
Premier Kenney had put to him the upcoming Alberta Senate elections,
00:03:53.660
and had asked Trudeau to hold off on appointing any senators for Alberta
00:04:01.600
And Trudeau basically said, yeah, yeah, that's not how we do things,
00:04:04.260
and gave, to use your words, the brush off there.
00:04:07.500
So in that sense, having an obligation to, no, no, no, you're going to sit down,
00:04:12.460
you're going to talk about this, forces you to respond to it,
00:04:16.220
because then, you know, voters, other premiers, the media can ask you,
00:04:23.280
And I think there's an obligation to at least take something out of it
00:04:27.060
if you have to go into that engagement process.
00:04:29.860
And another example is the, another sort of thing that critics of this approach point to is,
00:04:37.500
why can't you just bring it up with the premiers at the Council of the Federation?
00:04:40.920
Why can't you just get the work, work through the normal channels?
00:04:44.360
And I would say, well, one, there's about five provinces who receive a lot of their funding from this,
00:04:52.140
or at least a significant chunk that they're not going to want to just, you know, go with,
00:04:56.040
they don't want any negotiations, because they're pretty happy with how things are.
00:04:59.640
But there are five other provinces that are paying into this without getting anything.
00:05:04.380
So you could have a little five-on-five at the premiers conference.
00:05:08.000
But when you look at 2019, the Alberta government did get every single premier to unanimously agree
00:05:16.440
to give Alberta a significant retroactive payment of $5 billion, $6 billion.
00:05:21.140
Because in 2015, Alberta's revenues dropped $8 billion.
00:05:27.740
And so there's this program called fiscal stabilization that is meant to cushion the blow
00:05:33.360
when you have a sudden drop in revenues like that.
00:05:35.500
But it was, it had a 60 per person cap, $60 per person, which meant that Alberta got $250 million
00:05:42.600
on that $8 billion drop, which was about a 3% insurance payment, which is obviously not stabilizing anything.
00:05:50.260
And so partly out of recognition for all that Albertans have contributed to other provinces
00:05:54.600
through our taxes that we pay, which is much more than we get back,
00:05:59.160
the rest of the premiers said, please give Alberta this retroactive, like change the program,
00:06:04.380
which could benefit all of them conceivably, but give Alberta a retroactive payment,
00:06:10.960
And it's pretty unusual, I think, to get every premier to agree to give one province money.
00:06:15.940
I mean, it's easy to get them to all agree to ask the feds to give them all more money.
00:06:20.560
But this was a pretty significant win, and the feds just ignored it.
00:06:25.160
So, I don't know, I mean, part of this is, for those who criticize the process,
00:06:34.700
There's a lot of people in Alberta that are getting increasingly frustrated.
00:06:41.840
and the number of people who are so upset that they want to leave the country
00:06:49.760
So, we have a serious problem here, and it's not just, you know,
00:06:52.820
it's too easy, I think, for some politicians and groups in Canada
00:06:57.140
to sort of write off Alberta, demonize Alberta, mock Alberta.
00:07:01.760
But that's not going to last much longer before more serious things happen.
00:07:06.680
So, I feel like this referendum is a really good sort of first step in saying,
00:07:11.380
hey, we're not happy, can we get this addressed?
00:07:13.700
Yeah, and I think you are right to point out that chapter in Canada
00:07:19.320
where other provinces had agreed to give Alberta money
00:07:22.560
because that actually reinforces that the equalization formula
00:07:27.100
does not entirely capture the economic realities.
00:07:30.860
And this is still a problem that Alberta is contending with now,
00:07:36.400
which has been hit not just by the pandemic, like many other provinces,
00:07:42.680
it's still not being reflected in the equalization formula.
00:07:46.900
So, even if someone is committed to equalization,
00:07:51.400
the way we do this isn't really working right now.
00:07:54.680
Yeah, the equalization, yeah, so there's two things going on here.
00:07:57.900
One is the symbolic attempt to get some recognition
00:08:03.320
and how little we've gotten back from the country for decades.
00:08:05.980
But then, you know, so this is an avenue to address that.
00:08:14.460
The provinces since 2015 have come much, much closer together
00:08:22.160
the kind of wealth and ability to pay for services.
00:08:30.080
and it's really come down with the energy downturn
00:08:33.180
so that the provinces are, it was about a $5,000 gap
00:08:40.640
And when you think of the different costs of services
00:08:49.460
So the provinces are more close together than ever,
00:08:57.040
You know, I would argue maybe New Brunswick and PEI
00:09:05.120
But Quebec and Ontario are getting increasingly close,
00:09:08.600
especially if you use a factor like the cost of services.
00:09:14.020
and yet the payments have grown to $21 billion this year.
00:09:25.480
at least $10 billion more than what is justified,
00:10:00.920
when you talked about the independence sentiment,
00:10:49.540
and we'll never get anywhere near close enough.
00:11:06.560
saying, here's how much Albertans have been contributing.
00:11:31.380
and that somehow their success comes at our expense
00:11:56.800
And so we're going to do a good faith exercise here
00:12:02.980
Bill Buick, Executive Director of Fairness Alberta.
00:12:19.600
So I encourage people to go to fairnessalberta.ca
00:12:38.860
We've obviously been covering Alberta independence
00:13:10.400
But when Alberta tries to do the same thing,
1.00
00:13:25.840
Thanks for listening to The Andrew Lawton Show.