Juno News - November 27, 2023


Feds plan to fight ruling on single-use plastics ban


Episode Stats


Length

12 minutes

Words per minute

197.82025

Word count

2,408

Sentence count

4

Harmful content

Toxicity

3

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode of the Andrew Lawton Show, Catherine Swart, President of the Coalition of Concerned Manufacturers and Businesses of Canada joins me to talk about the recent Supreme Court ruling in favor of a ban on single-use plastic packaging in Canada.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
00:00:00.000 you're tuned in to the andrew lawton show
00:00:05.920 catherine swift is the president of the coalition of concerned manufacturers and businesses of
00:00:13.880 canada and joins me now it's always good to talk to her catherine thanks for coming on today
00:00:18.200 my pleasure andrew so obviously i mean industry in canada was harmed by the plastic span in the
00:00:25.880 first place you have some companies where uh literally products they made were effectively
00:00:30.660 outlawed overnight or made so prohibitive for uh people to get in canada and and now even with the
00:00:36.140 court ruling i think on one hand it's easy to say it's a bit of a win but it hasn't changed the
00:00:40.680 precariousness which is that you have a government declaring war on on plastic and i think for
00:00:46.380 starters it's based on a very false premise the the plastics that are ending up in turtles noses
00:00:52.080 in asia and africa are not coming from canada and the united states which have uh very good
00:00:57.560 waste management systems but it's companies in canada that pay the price for these things so
00:01:03.040 what has the impact been of this ban in the first place on canadian industry
00:01:07.000 and it's definitely companies pay but companies also pass the increased costs on to consumers let's
00:01:13.020 face it people at a time when an awful lot of small hospitality businesses for example restaurants
00:01:18.940 to hotels and so on um are already are still struggling to get out of the their pandemic
00:01:25.040 uh you know depression uh that this increased cost because they had to replace all this stuff
00:01:31.340 the alternatives are invariably more expensive and they're often worse for the environment that was
00:01:37.820 that was one of the classic uh elements of it that was utterly ridiculous but uh it just it's just
00:01:45.360 another hit on business the other thing and and anybody that knows anything about plastics knew
00:01:50.200 this from the get-go they outlawed things like straws as you say and apparently that one picture
00:01:55.940 of the one turtle and i love turtles so you know i i would sympathize with the turtle but that one
00:02:01.460 picture of the poor turtle precipitated a ban on the entire and the straws the paper straws that
00:02:09.180 replaced it were found to have toxic materials in them i mean i shouldn't be laughing it's utterly
00:02:14.140 ludicrous but but it is almost comedic if it weren't so serious uh we have thousands of jobs
00:02:20.360 in the plastics industry in canada the the things they banned were mere virtue signaling they're not
00:02:26.240 the worst sources of plastic waste for example water bottles are and i guess if we were all using
00:02:32.300 paper box water bottle thingies or whatever um then then you know we should be worrying about that
00:02:39.660 but i think they thought they'd get too much blowback from consumers but frankly i think water
00:02:43.860 bottles are ridiculous to have you know to to use at all because they're unnecessary we have good
00:02:48.100 water in this country but anyway the the things that they banned were virtue signaling they weren't
00:02:54.000 realistic at all calling them toxic and this of course is where the where the the judge's decision
00:02:59.000 came in and they had the bad luck of getting a judge that actually had some science background
00:03:03.620 she she had a master's degree in biology so she actually knew some of this stuff a lot better than
00:03:09.440 seemingly uh minister guiveau did so it was it was merely a virtue signaling exercise that hurt
00:03:16.080 business at a bad time not that it's ever a good time but hurt consumers naturally drove up prices
00:03:22.580 therefore fed inflation yet again and did nothing for the environment uh but added all kinds of costs to
00:03:28.840 to our economy and on very false premises as well and yeah canada isn't an offender on this front
00:03:34.440 uh plastics are eminently recyclable many many types of plastics are infinitely recyclable you can
00:03:41.320 cycle recycle recycle them and granted we'd have to have better facilities we already do some of that
00:03:46.300 but you know we need to have better facilities in the future to do that but to to um call this whole
00:03:52.220 area which is so incredibly helpful to our society we would never have gotten through the pandemic
00:03:57.460 without plastics they're sanitary they're sterile they're something that in in the medical profession
00:04:02.900 they can shape them into all kinds of interesting shapes that suit the you know suit the purpose
00:04:08.020 uh they're they actually use less heat and energy to create than a lot of metals do so they're
00:04:14.340 actually better for the environment in that respect uh and and there's in in the automobile industry
00:04:20.140 for example having plastic parts body you know auto body and so on means they're lighter and
00:04:25.940 therefore more fuel efficiency well and a couple of years ago we were just trumpeting the innovation
00:04:30.040 of 3d printers and now you know it's oh well plastics are terrible no one should should do
00:04:35.180 anything with plastic and you you mentioned earlier and i i had alluded to this and i don't have the
00:04:39.840 numbers handy but there was a massive study a few years back on plastic in the ocean and it was
00:04:46.420 literally the entirety of it was from uh africa and asia i think it was like eight eight rivers in asia
00:04:53.140 that contributed to almost all of it and then two rivers in africa and a lot of it is discarded
00:04:57.560 fishing gear it's not even trash that's thrown in in the water but but similar to with emissions
00:05:02.680 and emissions and plastics are the same thing we get virtue signaling western politicians that force
00:05:08.740 canadians in our context to pay for problems that if they are problems are being caused by the china's
00:05:16.340 and the indias of the world and it's the same as emissions you know canada is what two percent of
00:05:20.720 global emissions if you think emissions are the bad guy it's 1.5 yeah there we go so uh but but we're
00:05:26.700 the ones that have to deal with the carbon tax while china is opening new coal plants
00:05:30.720 and the carbon tax is damaging our economy so badly i can't tell you how many of our business
00:05:36.780 members are leaving the country or they're maybe leaving a little bit of a facility here but they're
00:05:41.700 going south of the border for example i know it's anecdotal but that's overseas that that you you swear
00:05:46.580 by that that companies in canada are reducing their footprint or leaving altogether because of it
00:05:51.080 totally totally and it's been going on for a number of years so you know the notion this is badly harming
00:05:58.040 the canadian economy imports are and the the farce of it is imports are coming in from the abusers the
00:06:04.440 china's the you know the the thailand's the malaysia indonesia these are all the countries that are the
00:06:10.440 main causes as you mentioned of of the plastic waste in the ocean and and they're doing absolutely nothing but our
00:06:16.280 businesses are having to leave because they're no longer competitive and it's just the carbon tax
00:06:21.160 that's one big factor because the other countries don't have one but it's also you know we have we
00:06:25.800 have pretty good environmental rules in canada and we have had for a very long time liberals can't take
00:06:30.520 credit for that but these other countries don't they abuse the environment like crazy so our businesses
00:06:35.640 who are following all the rules paying gobs of taxes following stringent environmental procedures
00:06:41.080 and so on they have to leave because they can't they won't be able to do business anymore what a 0.98
00:06:45.960 stupid policy well one of the challenges too is that on one hand and look i i'm a big free trade fan 0.99
00:06:52.120 and i i believe that free trade has come with some costs globalization has come with some costs but 0.99
00:06:56.760 but generally speaking we have a government that is very pro globalization a government that says we need
00:07:01.400 to be connected with the world but doesn't want to compete against other countries because that's the
00:07:06.200 reality businesses can are very mobile now more so in 2023 than ever before they can do exactly what
00:07:11.800 you just described they can pick up stakes and go elsewhere which means we need to compete on
00:07:16.040 regulations and on taxes with all of these other countries and it's it's so ridiculous that the
00:07:21.320 government has failed to realize that or realize that but is putting that virtue signaling above the
00:07:26.920 national economic interests of canada and i don't care i've concluded andrew they just don't care
00:07:32.680 because they're so focused on their ideological you know narrow ideological cause which is the climate
00:07:39.880 well yeah stephen gilbo is they don't really seem to care yeah it yeah it varies although although it's
00:07:45.480 quite hilarious when they saw that it was costing them gobs of votes in a liberal rich boat area of the
00:07:51.080 country atlantic canada they they suddenly all their principles went out the window and they gave them
00:07:57.240 a break on heating oil so let's face it the the hypocrisy is overwhelming uh but it's doing real
00:08:05.560 damage and no i don't think they even understand or care how many businesses and jobs and whatnot are
00:08:10.760 being driven out of the country we've seen by by a number of recent studies we've seen that our gdp
00:08:15.880 per capita which is which is a source of it's a very good indicator of standard living it's been dropping
00:08:21.800 precipitously we've always been lower than the us but now we're over 30 percent lower than the us
00:08:28.280 and it continues to decline that that kind of indicator is not good for canadians and and if
00:08:33.640 we want to enjoy the kind of lifestyle we you know we've gotten accustomed to uh something's got to
00:08:38.840 change fast and and if business can't compete in canada and we got government growing like crazy and
00:08:43.800 that's not a something that adds to our productivity at all quite the contrary it's a drag on productivity
00:08:49.320 then we got a lot of problems to deal with i mentioned earlier that even with the federal
00:08:54.280 court decision last week striking down the plastic span we have a federal government that's going to
00:08:59.160 appeal it we have a federal government that is probably going to try to put some modified version
00:09:04.120 in place and then we go back to square one and we have to restart the court process so i'm not convinced
00:09:10.200 it's a win and i i don't want to take that away from it but i'm not convinced it puts businesses that
00:09:14.760 are concerned about this or people that are concerned about this in the clear so there still is this
00:09:18.680 precariousness and i wanted to ask about that because you know it's one thing for a company
00:09:23.320 or a corporation to say uh we're leaving canada because xyz whatever those things are it's another
00:09:29.000 thing for a company to say you know we just have no idea what the future is going to hold and it's
00:09:34.520 safer to go elsewhere and i i think that must be happening as well oh very much so uh you can see how
00:09:40.840 bad investment uh non-residential investment because we know our housing markets out of control price-wise
00:09:46.040 but non-residential investment which is a source again of of wealth that promotes our our standard
00:09:51.720 of living uh that's been declining for years under the trudeau government and a lot of it is
00:09:56.040 uncertainty there's a lot of uncertainties in the world of business no matter what we don't need the
00:10:01.080 government to add more and more and more and yet that's what they've done and the supreme court as you
00:10:05.720 may recall just about a month ago struck down the bill c69 the so-called no more pipelines bill
00:10:11.560 and that had introduced all kinds of uncertainty for large projects in canada yeah and and that
00:10:18.440 was again one where you've had a couple of major projects that have just said you know it's not
00:10:22.760 worth it and and then it was particularly bad when you had trudeau on this side of the border and biden
00:10:27.400 on the other side of the border and you know the long uh long long anticipated keystone project just
00:10:32.520 became dead on arrival so uh you know obviously uh you've had the opportunity to speak to a number of
00:10:37.880 political leaders i know premier danielle smith in alberta and uh pierre pauliev the the conservative
00:10:43.320 leader i mean are you optimistic that that if i mean in alberta's case where she's in government or
00:10:48.760 at the the national level where pauliev wants to form government that they can turn this around or are
00:10:53.320 the problems too great right now for a government to really solve in a four-year term well they're going
00:10:59.880 to be hamstrung by our debt for sure not so much alberta alberta the energy industry you know the
00:11:04.760 fossil fuel industry has been doing quite well and that's really helped their their bottom line
00:11:08.280 as well as canada's i found it so ironic uh laughably ironic that the liberals were celebrating
00:11:14.440 that they had greater revenues than they had forecast it's all because of the oil and gas
00:11:18.840 industry which they hate so i mean talk about hypocrisy but i mean of course things can be turned around
00:11:25.320 and and we showed it back in the 90s and that was a liberal government that the largest cuts in
00:11:30.680 government and the left loves to say oh the conservatives will cut cut cut it was liberals
00:11:34.600 that did it and they did it because we were we had they had to do it whoever was in government at the
00:11:38.280 time would have had to do it because we were up against it financially big time but um that's going
00:11:43.560 to happen again i'm afraid because our debt is so high so yes things can be reversed but not quickly
00:11:49.160 it's going to take time and it's going to hurt all right catherine swift always good to talk to you
00:11:54.360 president of the coalition of concern manufacturing businesses of canada uh thank you so much for coming on
00:12:00.680 thanks andrew thanks for listening to the andrew lawton show support the program by donating to true
00:12:06.120 north at www.tnc.news