ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- June 07, 2025
Ford gushes over Carney as pipeline plans crumble
Episode Stats
Length
51 minutes
Words per Minute
186.53052
Word Count
9,584
Sentence Count
630
Misogynist Sentences
7
Hate Speech Sentences
14
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
Yeah, I did not actually catch the game, Isaac. I love your t-shirt, but this is going to
00:00:06.620
sound ridiculously self-centered and really superstitious. I haven't watched a second
00:00:11.700
of the Oilers' playoffs. I've been abstaining. At first, I was super mad because of how silly
00:00:17.000
and political they were with Mark Carney. Like, don't let somebody suit up for you,
00:00:21.260
no matter what team they're on during the election, right? Just don't do that. But then
00:00:25.860
I'm like, oh, wait, they're doing well. And I want them to do well. And so out of superstition,
00:00:30.940
I'm like not glancing at a TV screen if the Oilers are on. I know that sounds silly, but
00:00:36.300
knock wood, like they're doing good, right? Like they won in overtime last night, I've been told.
00:00:41.360
Yeah, an amazing goal in overtime. And we all have our superstitions in sports, Chris,
00:00:47.120
especially hockey, like last night, because we're playing in June, by the way. So it's super hot in
00:00:51.360
my room and I have all these things on under my jersey and I'm so hot, but I'm like, I can't take
00:00:55.560
my jersey off middle of the game. Like we're winning. So I was kind of screwed there. Had
00:01:00.140
to, had to keep it on and dive the heat. Cause like I said, it's in June, it's like 30 degrees
00:01:04.540
outside and we're watching hockey, which Hey, can't complain. Cause most teams are already
00:01:08.600
out golfing, but yeah, it sounds like a fun night, but I'm not a hockey man, but I tuned
00:01:12.740
in around the second period and saw the score was three, two. I'm like, oh yeah, just another
00:01:16.920
loss for another Canadian team. But it looks like you guys pulled out. So best of luck to
00:01:22.040
the Oilers, but, uh, all, all the Calgary people in my life, they're, uh, they're definitely
00:01:26.380
mad. I know Liam at the tax rest Federation. He's just pulling his hair out. Cause he's
00:01:30.240
a, he's a flames fan. And, uh, I guess there's no, uh, you know, Alberta sympathy, uh, for
00:01:35.480
the fellow team, even though, uh, you know, you guys are neighbors pretty much.
00:01:39.700
What's your game, Noah. Do you like watching any sports ball entertainment?
00:01:43.940
Basketball is my game. So, you know, the Raptors, they're not doing great right now. Uh, gotta
00:01:47.580
wait a few more years for them to, you know, even get competitive, but we got the championship
00:01:51.560
in 2019. So I'm still living off of that, you know, excitement, uh, happiness.
00:01:56.760
Yeah. That, uh, basket they scored to get into the final. We'll still, uh, I mean, that was
00:02:01.880
historic. I almost felt like we were in a simulation. That was so cool. Okay. This is
00:02:05.440
actually not a simulation. We have a show, so let's get it going.
00:02:12.720
Hey, my name is Chris Sims. I'm the Alberta director for the Canadian taxpayers Federation
00:02:16.900
here on true north. I'm joined now by my friends, Isaac and Noah. We're going to talk about news
00:02:23.620
and politics for the next few minutes on our big show. Um, I wanted to start with,
00:02:30.100
this is one of the weirdest clips I've seen come out of politics in a while, and especially coming
00:02:37.380
from a sitting premier. And I don't even want to chat about it first. Let's all watch it together.
00:02:43.860
And then we can respond to it just to tee it up. This is coming out of the first ministers meeting.
00:02:49.620
That is typically the name of the meeting that is given to when the premiers gather with the prime
00:02:54.660
minister. And this is Ontario premier Doug Ford chatting about the prime minister to his face.
00:03:03.700
Let's watch. Let me tell you this, I'm going to be very blunt here. This has been the best meeting
00:03:09.460
we've had in 10 years, simple, best meeting I've had in seven years. And there was no expectations.
00:03:16.020
The prime minister was going to come out and say, you get that project, you get that project. It was
00:03:20.500
a great discussion. Now we were all talking. Now it's time to put it into action. All of us are
00:03:27.060
responsible. But I thought it was an incredible meeting, great communication, great collaboration.
00:03:33.700
And we all walked out of that room united. And that's the most important thing. Now the prime
00:03:38.340
minister is going to go to work, get the legislation passed, and we'll divvy it up. I described him
00:03:44.820
today as Santa Claus. He's coming. And his sled was full of all sorts of stuff. Now he's taken off back
00:03:52.020
to the North Pole. He's going to sort it out. And then he's going to call us. The only thing short of Santa Claus
00:03:57.780
is my big belly. I got to loan it to him. So who wants to talk about that first? Like it started
00:04:06.180
out as the usual, like lip service, blah, blah, blah. And then it took the weirdest turn, man.
00:04:12.020
Who wants to go first on this? Yeah, I'll say a few things. I just, and obviously there were cameras
00:04:16.900
and all the premiers there, but I just, when he said that exact quote about Santa Claus, I would love to
00:04:22.020
see the shot of Smith and Mo maybe, and just, just see if they're like in any way surprised at that
00:04:28.980
language. I mean, look, I covered this first ministers meeting. I was watching it as the final
00:04:34.660
press conference was happening. And there was undoubtedly a consensus among the premiers,
00:04:40.420
even from Smith and Mo, because Smith was obviously the number one premier I was watching to see if she'd
00:04:45.300
go against the pack, so to speak, and say, hey, it's not as good as we were pretending that it is.
00:04:51.460
But of course, then we saw the very next day, BC premier David Eby essentially shattered the
00:04:57.780
consensus because they're all like, after the first ministers conference, they're like, oh yeah,
00:05:02.740
it's going to be wonderful. We're all going to do our energy projects. We're all so happy.
00:05:06.980
Carney's supporting us, blah, blah, blah. And then Eby comes out and says, ah, wait a second. You guys
00:05:11.380
aren't building a pipeline in BC. I don't know why you thought you were. And for those who don't know,
00:05:17.140
premier David Eby wasn't actually at the conference. He was the lone premier who wasn't there.
00:05:20.740
Because I guess he had some sort of trip already planned to Japan, I think it were, or somewhere
00:05:25.540
in Asia. So he sent his deputy premier, Nikki Sharma there. But obviously, she didn't portray his
00:05:32.900
thoughts accurately, because I'm guessing she didn't tell Smith, actually, you're not building a
00:05:37.940
pipeline through BC because Smith went as far as to outlining the optimal economic scenario for doing
00:05:45.140
that. She said she was talking about the pathways project and how it could fund itself through
00:05:49.700
essentially increasing their oil exports. So she was just saying this will be a great economic
00:05:56.980
scenario. We get this project going. We'll get an extra million barrels a day, I think she said,
00:06:01.540
through the northwestern coast of BC. She said of BC. So obviously, she thought they were getting a
00:06:06.820
pipeline through BC. And then the very next day, as I said, Eby came out and said, not so fast,
00:06:11.300
Premier Smith. So the consensus, while it might have been rare, was very short lived.
00:06:18.260
Yeah, you might have some things to say about the Santa Claus comments.
00:06:22.980
Yeah, you're just for people to know you're in Ontario, correct?
00:06:27.620
Yes, yes, I'm living through the, you know, fortination as we are in this part of the country.
00:06:33.060
But yeah, I just thought it was very sycophantic. It looked like Doug Ford was a lifelong liberal,
00:06:38.820
was a Carney-ite, you know, Rosemary Barton's conscience. You know, it really seemed like he was
00:06:45.620
going all in for the liberals. And it looks like we know how he voted, despite what he might say in
00:06:51.380
front of a camera and a microphone. But yeah, Doug Ford was really excited, even though Carney
00:06:56.580
really hasn't delivered anything tangible. You know, he has made promises to bring down
00:07:02.500
interprovincial trade barriers. But, you know, really, the key drivers of bringing down these
00:07:08.740
trade barriers are the provinces, are the premiers. We've seen Scott Moe in Saskatchewan, for example,
00:07:14.020
pass legislation to bring down trade barriers. And, you know, it's going to require Doug Ford to pass
00:07:20.580
legislation in the OLA. It's going to require Premier Smith and David Eby to really take action on this.
00:07:29.140
It's going to require Quebec to back down on some of their instincts, you know, on this issue and to
00:07:34.980
really open up their market to other provinces. So it's going to take more than words at a little
00:07:42.820
meeting that, you know, is being done in which Carney wants to, you know, concoct a consensus among the
00:07:49.700
premiers, even if, you know, that sort of consensus is going to be really hard to achieve, even possibly
00:07:56.660
impossible. So, you know, as they say, actions speak louder than words. But it looks like Ford was
00:08:03.300
smitten by the game that Carney was spitting at the conference.
00:08:07.300
Speaker 1 Smith with what he was spitting. That was pretty good. All right. A few things going on
00:08:14.100
here. I've been in the game for a while. Number one, when you, when you change the guard, even if
00:08:22.580
the party is the same, if the dude at the head of it, isn't the same person, there's this kind of
00:08:28.980
sense of renewal. Okay. It's like, you know, when you've had to be wearing like dress shoes all day,
00:08:34.340
your feet are killing you. Just taking them off makes a huge difference. It's like, oh,
00:08:40.420
I'm a new person. So this is kind of, I think what's happened here. So former prime minister,
00:08:46.900
Justin Trudeau is no longer there showing off his socks and talking nonsense and, you know,
00:08:54.180
putting up barriers and quoting Stefan Guibo and all these other things. Like, keep in mind some of the
00:08:59.860
stuff that Trudeau said. Okay. Like he's on the record saying that the only people who were noticing
00:09:04.740
the cost of the carbon tax were people who lived in mansions with indoor swimming pools and three
00:09:10.180
big personal cars. Trudeau was on the record after jetting down to Brazil on taxpayers money,
00:09:15.540
saying that paying his carbon tax was more important than paying the rent and feeding your kids.
00:09:22.260
You get rid of that guy. Any change is going to feel like, oh my gosh,
00:09:27.540
you're all singing Kumbaya. It's a miracle. Yeah, not so much. So it was frankly silly
00:09:35.060
to hear Ontario premier Doug Ford talking like that. He's not new to this. He should know better.
00:09:41.220
He should have kept his cards closer to his chest and not lavish so much praise because
00:09:46.500
guess what just happened? US president Donald Trump made good on his threat and has doubled the tariffs
00:09:52.580
on things like aluminum and steel. Folks might remember during the election campaign that the
00:09:58.980
steel workers, the pipe workers around Hamilton were so opposed to Carney's industrial carbon tax,
00:10:06.580
which is coming that they endorsed Pierre Polyev and Ford said nothing, nothing. He did not say one word
00:10:15.780
against Carney or his industrial carbon tax plans. So pitter patter. I don't know why he wasn't bringing
00:10:22.740
this stuff up nowhere. Isaac, I don't know if you guys have been seeing a lot of the news here, but
00:10:27.220
a lot of those steel manufacturers, especially in Ontario, they're just bracing for the worst.
00:10:32.820
Yeah. And I really sympathize for the, you know, those manufacturers who are going to have to,
00:10:37.300
you know, have to deal with the market in which their products are going to cost a lot more
00:10:41.300
to sell to the biggest market. And, you know, if Mark Carney really was, you know, doing such a
00:10:46.900
fantastic job as Doug Ford, you know, had portrayed Mark Carney to have been doing, I think, you know,
00:10:52.900
Mark Carney would have in his trip to Washington told, Hey, Mr. Trump, Hey, let's ease off on raising
00:10:58.740
tariffs, you know, for all the great media coverage that Carney got on his trip to Washington. It didn't
00:11:04.980
really accomplish, didn't really accomplish anything. He didn't lower any tariffs. In fact, you know, as we've
00:11:10.740
seen, Trump has raised tariffs on aluminum and steel. And, you know, what really, what relief had
00:11:17.220
Canadian workers really been granted, you know, it's, we're really going to have to brace for the
00:11:22.100
worst in our manufacturing industry, you know, at the end of the day, even though tariffs is not a
00:11:27.220
good idea for the United States, since they are in such a much larger economy, they are able to sort of
00:11:33.460
hollow out our manufacturing sector. And I'm not an advocate for reciprocal terrorists. But what I am
00:11:39.300
saying is that, you know, the Carney government, the foreign affairs ministry need to do a better job
00:11:44.660
negotiating with the Trump State Department and ensuring that the United States are granted
00:11:50.100
some of the concessions that they want in order to bring these tariffs down. You know, he said
00:11:55.060
his first priority when forming government were after this election would be to negotiate a new free
00:12:01.540
trade deal. We haven't seen any updates on that in the news. I don't know, maybe if my newsfeed has been
00:12:07.540
broken, but no progress has been made on that front. So definitely looking forward to more progress
00:12:14.100
before we start calling Mr. Carney Santa Claus. Yeah. Oh, God, that was gross. So Isaac, we were
00:12:19.940
chatting, we were all chatting before we started rolling. And Doug Ford in Ontario, like his debt
00:12:26.980
is $443 billion. They're in a huge deficit right now. I checked our debt clock on the taxpayer website.
00:12:36.260
It's going up like $1,000 a second. So what is this? They just elect somebody in a blue tie
00:12:42.740
and it's fine. He gets to quote people like Margaret Thatcher or Ronald Reagan or pretend
00:12:47.780
without having the fiscal responsibility to go along with it. So this is where we're getting frustrated as
00:12:53.460
the taxpayer. Like, we're not seeing the actual budget getting balanced. We're not seeing some
00:12:58.660
prudence here. We're just seeing a lot of gushing. I don't know if you're noticing the same thing.
00:13:02.740
Yeah. Gushing more debt onto the, you know, the already extremely large debt. The latest budget
00:13:08.660
that they tabled was $14.7 billion in deficit. And this is, you know, for a bunch of subsidy
00:13:14.740
programs and whatnot. But what taxpayers really do not need right now are big subsidies. The big
00:13:20.020
corporations, what they need is tax relief. What they need is regulatory relief. That's the way that
00:13:24.500
you're going to combat this trade, the trade war that the Trump administration wants to launch. You
00:13:29.940
have to make Canada's economy competitive in spite of the trade restrictions. That means
00:13:35.540
lowering regulations. That means cutting taxes for businesses and cutting taxes for individuals
00:13:41.460
so that we are able to spur the economic activity. But instead of taking that approach, Doug Ford,
00:13:47.380
you know, takes the subsidized and big government approach, the big government approach under a
00:13:52.340
supposedly conservative government. You know, I don't really think that the Kathleen Wynne government,
00:13:56.820
for example, would be taking a much different approach if they had one in 2018 and in subsequent
00:14:03.940
years. So I really, really disappointed. I know a lot of fellow conservatives in Ontario
00:14:08.980
are disappointed with the approach that the PCs have been taking. I mean, look at the Ontario Liberals.
00:14:14.260
I mean, for all the, you know, the weaknesses and, you know, what the wrong that the Ontario Liberals
00:14:19.380
have done when they're in government. But leader Bonnie Crombie at least campaigned on tax cuts.
00:14:24.340
She at least campaigned on working with municipalities to cut development charges and
00:14:29.140
other ways to reduce the burden on taxpayers. We saw no such promises from Doug Ford, you know,
00:14:35.460
and just look at how we campaigned in 2018. It's really disappointing.
00:14:38.660
Yeah, I'll just say a few things as an outsider to Ontario and what my opinion was when I was looking
00:14:45.620
at the election. Obviously, just looking at the options Ontario had, I do think Doug Ford was the best
00:14:51.380
choice, but he's in no way, shape or form, in my opinion, a conservative, certainly not a big C
00:14:56.900
conservative. And this is coming from an Albertan who I would say most Canadians would probably agree
00:15:02.100
that being conservatives. Daniel Smith is by far the best conservative premier in the country,
00:15:07.220
although I am biased in saying that, of course, as an Albertan. But yeah, I mean, that's the thing.
00:15:11.940
Ontario didn't really have great options. So yeah, to think Ford is, I mean, he's clearly not a
00:15:21.460
conservative fiscally. And I can see how that would be very frustrating for Ontarians. Just quickly,
00:15:28.260
though, when I was watching the first ministers meeting, Ford stood out in the sense that he,
00:15:33.620
more than any other premier and even more than the prime minister, continued in his anti-Trump rhetoric,
00:15:38.180
I think more so than anyone else. He was really against the United States. And I've seen him
00:15:43.300
catch a lot of backlash online for that, specifically when he threatened to cut off
00:15:47.540
their electricity. Some were saying that's literally an act of war. If you think of that in any other
00:15:52.260
context, cutting off someone's electricity, a country's electricity is certainly an act of war.
00:15:55.940
So, I mean, Ford has taken a real hard line against Trump and the tariffs, which that's another
00:16:02.980
approach where a lot of people are going to find disagreement on. But I mean, just, yeah,
00:16:07.700
fiscally, I don't see how any Ontarians could support Ford, especially if you're coming from
00:16:13.140
a conservative mindset. I mean, Chris, what do you think as a taxpayer advocate?
00:16:17.460
Yeah, it's just to dovetail it back into Alberta here. Smith is doing a great job standing up to
00:16:22.100
Ottawa. She's doing a very good job, I think, dealing with US President Donald Trump, because,
00:16:27.780
of course, we got a lower tariff punishment on our energy exports. I've never understood the whole
00:16:34.340
concept of let's scream and shout and call people names and then try to negotiate with them, like,
00:16:39.300
especially if they're an ally. Like, that's a really dumb way to try to win friends and influence
00:16:43.860
people. Like, maybe don't do that. So she didn't take that route. She was called a trader for it in
00:16:48.020
the Eastern media, but she took it anyway. So that was really good. She's doing other elements here that
00:16:53.540
are also really good, like standing up for firearms owners, standing up for people's own personal
00:16:57.940
freedoms here in Alberta. However, we are running a deficit right now. Our deficit is about $5 billion.
00:17:05.700
So that's not okay. We also have a provincial industrial carbon tax here still in Alberta.
00:17:11.860
That's also not okay. If we look next door to Premier Scott Moe, they technically have balanced
00:17:17.780
the budget. It's a really tiny little thin surplus. You can almost see through it, but it's a balanced
00:17:23.380
budget as of right now. And he got rid of all carbon taxes in his province and is very vocal
00:17:28.580
about that. So just a little reminder, we, if we want to have Fortress Alberta here, then we have to
00:17:35.220
make sure that we're locked and loaded. I don't know if people, if you guys have watched T2, Terminator 2.
00:17:41.620
So Sarah Connor, super awesome character, right? I've heard people compare Daniel Smith to that.
00:17:46.740
Imagine if it was go time and she goes to that New Mexico, you know, bug out location and she opens up the
00:17:52.900
cash and there's nothing there. There's no weapons. She hasn't had any prep. So we can't be running a
00:17:59.220
loose ship here fiscally in Alberta. We've got to cut spending at the provincial government level.
00:18:05.300
If we don't balance the budget here, then we're not the example and the beacon for the rest of the
00:18:10.420
country. So just a little Amber light of caution. Speaking of budgets, did we want to move on to this
00:18:16.100
motion federally in the House of Commons? Absolutely. Let's do it. Sure. Yeah. Yeah.
00:18:22.740
Yeah. So a lot was made out of this. I'll even put my glasses on to read it. So as we know, of course,
00:18:27.940
Andrew Scheer is currently the leader of the opposition in the House of Commons,
00:18:31.220
while Conservative Party leader Pierre Polyev does a by-election out here in Alberta,
00:18:35.620
running to get a seat back. But what was interesting is that the House actually passed a conservative
00:18:40.900
motion demanding a spring budget from Kearney, spring meaning right now, the minority liberals
00:18:47.060
did suffer that defeat in the House of Commons. And it was because I've been told the whip wasn't
00:18:52.900
doing a good head count. So what has to happen when you're in the House of Commons, okay,
00:18:58.260
you usually have to make sure you have enough people in there to get a motion defeated or a motion passed.
00:19:05.060
So you have to do your own, but that's why they call it a whip. You have to whip them into shape,
00:19:08.980
make sure that they're there on time. It's an old term from the British Parliament.
00:19:12.340
You have to make sure there's enough, you know, backsides and seats. And if you've got a minority,
00:19:17.300
you have to make sure that you've done enough negotiating as House leader with other parties
00:19:22.820
to make sure that you've got enough people on your side, either from the block or the NDP,
00:19:27.140
whatever has to happen in that situation. So what happened is the Conservatives have this motion
00:19:32.420
on the floor of the House and it passed. And the motion basically called for a budget right now.
00:19:38.900
Few things there. Number one, yes, they could. So the finance department, the permanent government,
00:19:45.380
the bureaucrats in the department, they've got all these numbers. Like they've got constant
00:19:49.860
supercomputers that are turning around. They could have this thing printed up quickly,
00:19:54.500
especially if they kept out all the like political language and just stuck to dollars and cents.
00:19:59.380
Two, this doesn't actually force them to do it. Motions coming from the opposition in this manner,
00:20:05.380
if they're really symbolic, and in this case, they're embarrassing, but it doesn't force them
00:20:08.980
to do it. But I still found it interesting that it passed. Guys, what did you guys think about this?
00:20:13.700
Yeah, you know, as you mentioned, this motion has no force of law. So unfortunately,
00:20:19.060
it doesn't force the government to table a budget in the spring. However, you know, as you said,
00:20:24.420
you know, it is an important symbolic gesture, you know, in that it shows that parliament's will is
00:20:30.580
for the government to table this, you know, this budget, and they're just not going to comply.
00:20:36.580
They said they're going to table a budget in the fall. That's not good enough. You know,
00:20:39.620
Canadians, you know, at least twice a year, you know, that's the sort of convention that we've
00:20:44.420
developed in the fall, in the spring, we learn about the nation's finances. And, you know, we're being
00:20:49.540
stripped of the opportunity to learn about the nation's finance. What is the government spending
00:20:54.660
look like? What is our, what is our projected deficit? You know, what are the projected deficits
00:20:59.060
in the years going forward? This is really important information for Canadians to know,
00:21:03.940
you know, we got our last update in the fall, you know, I think it's about, it's about time that we
00:21:10.100
know what the government has been getting up to in recent years, especially since when Trudeau was in
00:21:16.420
in his last days in government, he spent billions of dollars, authorized billions of dollars in
00:21:21.780
programs and in spending. So it is pertinent that we understand what the government is doing,
00:21:26.660
how the nation's finances are looking and, you know, for the government to really put forward a plan
00:21:32.980
on how they plan on managing the nation's finances going forward, what this, you know,
00:21:38.420
Carney government's sort of split between the operational budget and the capital budget will look like,
00:21:43.860
even though, you know, if you just smush it all together and you get the total deficit,
00:21:47.780
that's, you know, all you really need to do. But at the end of the day, it's very important that we
00:21:54.260
receive a budget annually and, you know, receive those mini budgets alongside to, you know, really
00:21:59.300
fill up the knowledge gap. And it's quite disappointing that they're not going to be delivering on this.
00:22:03.940
Isaac? Yeah, I got a bunch to add. First of all, I think the bill failed by two votes. And when I
00:22:13.780
last checked, I believe that four liberals were absent the vote. So I don't know what they were
00:22:18.500
doing. Okay, five. I don't know what those five liberal MPs were doing. But obviously, they lost
00:22:23.460
their party to vote by not being there. Because if they were there and voted liberal, which you would
00:22:27.300
assume they would, the motion would have passed. Next thing. Yeah, obviously, this wasn't a
00:22:34.820
confidence motion, like a budget would be and like, I think the upcoming, they're voting on the throne
00:22:39.700
speech, which will be a confidence motion from what I've seen. So that could, if it didn't pass,
00:22:45.620
it would, of course, throw us into a general election. And just getting into that, the throne
00:22:50.260
speech vote, from what I've seen, the NDP leader, Don Davies, the interim leader, he's been saying they
00:22:55.460
might vote against it. So just as a symbolic gesture, that may be suggestive that he might
00:23:00.820
have more of a spine than Jagmeet Singh, because he's actually going to vote against the liberals.
00:23:05.220
Although, of course, the bloc would be enough to pass the bill if the liberals can work with them.
00:23:10.900
And just speaking to conservative voters quickly, this might be good news, because it shows how close
00:23:18.740
it is. The government lost their first vote, even though it's not a binding motion. It is symbolic in
00:23:24.500
that sense. And then just quickly touching on one last thing, Chris, we talked about this in the
00:23:28.100
pre-show. Just Franco Terrizano of the taxpayers federation, he's been citing some good examples
00:23:34.580
of times when we got a budget. World War II, the Great Depression. I mean, other examples,
00:23:38.740
this is ridiculous. How are we getting budgets during World War II, the Great Depression? These are
00:23:45.620
historic times of uncertainty. And now we're not getting a budget for an inexplicable reason,
00:23:52.100
obviously, when compared to these monumental events. It's like, you know, IDK, right? Who cares?
00:23:58.660
It's the clown car. I will remind people, remember when things were getting really gnarly in 2020,
00:24:05.780
and we were slowly being crushed and locked down? Remember when the federal government tried saying,
00:24:11.380
yeah, no budget, and no plans on ever tabling a budget, maybe ever again. We're just going to keep on
00:24:17.620
spending. That's fine, right? Just get past this motion so we can just spend with absolutely no
00:24:23.620
oversight. They tried doing that in the middle of even before we knew what this thing was.
00:24:29.940
And everybody was still a little bit freaked out. This is early 2020. Yeah. So do not let governments
00:24:36.420
tell you, oh, it's an emergency. Therefore, hand me your wallet. Because your rights and your ability to
00:24:43.860
hold government to account will evaporate, like gone. And so this is why, frankly, it's important
00:24:51.620
to insist and tap the desk and say, no, you guys have the math. Show us. Because it's our money.
00:24:59.700
The government isn't generating its own wealth and figuring out where to throw money. No, these are
00:25:06.020
our tax dollars. And when they blow their budget, and they throw another deficit on top of our federal
00:25:12.500
debt, we're the ones that have to pay the interest charges. I have to stress this. What we're paying
00:25:18.820
in interest on the debt is more than what we spend on the Department of National Defense.
00:25:27.380
Those guys and gals that we want to see, you know, protecting our borders and stopping terrorism,
00:25:32.020
and maybe flying fighter jets and stuff. Yeah, that, that line item, we're spending more than that
00:25:38.740
on interest on the debt. Like this is a serious crisis. Some of the numbers of Franco was pulling
00:25:44.100
out was really important. And this is just one. Carney, okay, the former central banker, governor
00:25:49.940
of the Bank of Canada, governor of the Bank of England, probably knows some math. He's going to add
00:25:55.540
225 billion dollars onto our debt over the next four years. Ridiculous.
00:26:02.820
Worse than what Trudeau was planning to do. So the central banker is now worse with money than the
00:26:10.100
drama teacher. Like, what gives? This guy has a PhD from Oxford in economics. Like, pull your suit
00:26:18.420
socks up there, man. All right. So that was important, I think, at least symbolically,
00:26:23.140
that they said we expect a budget. And I encourage everybody, including folks, frankly, who support the
00:26:28.740
NDP who are watching the show. Good on you. Stay on Don Davies. Tell him, yeah, we want to see stuff
00:26:34.900
like this. Keep standing up for people. Stand up for your constituents. That's the only way we hold
00:26:39.540
government to account, folks. All right. This one, I saw this. There's no taxpayer element here,
00:26:45.380
but I wanted to throw it to you guys. There's something going up. I actually don't know. There's
00:26:50.020
an airline. I can't remember which one it was. They had some sort of like celebration. The pride
00:26:54.580
celebration was this during work or what is going on here? Who wants to take this? Yeah,
00:26:58.580
I'll get into this. So Air Canada on X essentially was celebrating their first ever LGBTQ flight. And I
00:27:10.820
can't, I don't know what all the letters are. And it's funny in saying that one of the pilots in the
00:27:15.780
video, because there was a video of this, he actually even, he had a quote saying like, I might mess up the
00:27:23.620
letters because he, he's like, because there's so many getting added and he, this was in the video.
00:27:27.300
He was probably around my age, I'm guessing. Anyways. Yeah. Air Canada was celebrating their
00:27:32.820
first ever LGBTQ flight. And it seems that they were the only ones celebrating that because within a
00:27:38.420
few hours, five or six, maybe they had to turn off the comments on their ex post because at the,
00:27:43.540
at the time there was like four times the amount of comments as the word likes, like 800 comments and
00:27:47.540
200 likes, something like that. And I'll tell you, I went through every comment, Chris, there were,
00:27:51.460
there were none positive. It was all just blasting the airline saying, look, this is the, the important
00:27:57.460
factor for flying on an airplane is safety. We don't care who's flying the plane and, and pushing
00:28:04.100
identity politics is not going to help us get there more safely. So that, that was crazy. Everyone is
00:28:10.420
essentially calling on them to abandon identity politics. And at True North, we've done reporting on
00:28:16.980
DEI in airlines in the past, uh, air Canada being one of them. They, so they mandated employee training
00:28:23.220
on microaggressions, allyship and unconscious bias. They also have a, um, dedicated DEI sourcing manager
00:28:31.620
and they require recruitment from designated groups. So you can imagine what those are, but of course,
00:28:36.980
they're not the only airline in Canada with these identity politics. WestJet recently implemented,
00:28:42.340
uh, genderless uniforms and they also had fully, uh, female crew flights. So kind of similar to what
00:28:48.500
Air Canada is doing here. I mean, the list goes on, but what this post showed and what Canadians'
00:28:53.940
reaction to it showed is that people really don't want identity politics in, in airlines. What they
00:28:59.700
want is qualified individuals where merit reigns supreme over, uh, yeah, DEI.
00:29:06.340
Yeah, that's exactly it. Like we don't, we don't care. You're crashing out there, Noah. Are you all
00:29:10.820
right? Yeah, no, I was kind of sleeping. I'm like, oh my God, here's another slew of DEI initiatives.
00:29:17.220
And you know, that, that, that the Air Canada DEI office is pushing out like it, like nobody cares
00:29:22.340
at this point. Yeah. And I think, you know, we've really seen this in the decline of, uh, DEI in
00:29:27.620
corporate America, uh, especially after Trump got elected, you really, really seen, uh, corporations,
00:29:33.700
uh, closing down their DEI offices, uh, firing their chief diversity officers and, uh, whatnot.
00:29:39.700
And, you know, it seems like this, uh, you know, transition is happening in Canada, but it's
00:29:44.900
happening a little slower. Uh, if you do recall, Air Canada used to be a, uh, used to be owned by the
00:29:50.340
government of Canada. Uh, it is not anymore. It's publicly traded. And, uh, if you have Air Canada
00:29:55.540
stock, I mean, you're probably like not a happy camper right now. You know, it's not exactly doing, uh,
00:30:01.860
well, uh, and feel for good reason. Air Canada service is, uh, not as great as a lot of people
00:30:06.820
remember it being, uh, before. So maybe they should, uh, you know, focus on, uh, delivering
00:30:12.020
quality service to their clients instead of, uh, focusing on, you know, having a bunch of, uh,
00:30:17.860
2SLGBTQI people, uh, flying the plane. Honestly, I don't care, uh, what, who you're, you know, going home
00:30:26.420
with, uh, uh, you know, if you're the pilot, uh, or if you're the person, you know, um, who
00:30:33.140
is the copilot, I really don't care. Uh, all I care is that you're competent at your job, uh, that
00:30:38.500
the plane is flown well, uh, and that I got my, uh, cup of water, my, uh, 200 milliliter cup of water,
00:30:44.420
you know, halfway through the flight. Like that's, that's really all I care about. You know, I, I just
00:30:48.340
want that done well. Uh, and you know, the fact that they're, you know, sort of celebrating this in the
00:30:54.260
video at the sort of celebrating this on, uh, like on the flight, you know, to telling, uh,
00:30:59.460
all the client, uh, all the people on the plane, like, yeah, you know, this is a, a full LG. Like,
00:31:04.020
I don't care. Like, I just want to like read or listen to my audio book or read my physical book
00:31:07.940
or, or whatever. I don't want to, you know, deal with that. I don't want to like celebrate that.
00:31:12.580
And I'm not, I think, I feel like a lot of people feel the same way. They're just being, uh, having
00:31:16.340
this pushed down their throats. Um, just a little personal anecdote. Uh, a couple of days ago,
00:31:21.620
one of my, uh, one of the people close to me said, uh, that, you know, they had to go to work
00:31:26.500
and they were expected to put on like a pride shirt and, uh, or a pride pin. Uh, and my, and, uh,
00:31:32.020
this person said, well, you know, I kind of don't want to do that. Like, you know, it doesn't
00:31:35.780
accord with my values. And, uh, they basically threatened, uh, you know, uh, this person with,
00:31:40.740
uh, being fired saying, you know, this is not, you know, you have to, you have to do this, uh,
00:31:45.060
you have to align with our corporate values. And, you know, usually I, I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm afraid,
00:31:49.940
you know, that company in specific is not moving away from, uh, the excessive, uh, emphasis on DEI.
00:31:55.940
But, uh, I think more and more Canadians as they speak out on this, as air Canada sees the negative
00:32:01.940
replies on the, on this, uh, social media posts, uh, they're going to start moving away from this.
00:32:06.420
You just need to, uh, keep, you know, saying what you, uh, think, uh, and don't let the woke mob
00:32:12.020
sort of try to cancel you for, uh, you know, having a perfectly reasonable views.
00:32:16.100
Yeah. Just touching on something quick, Noah, on your personal anecdote there, I do think that
00:32:20.900
the change starts with the people in that sense, that, that being, I was, I was curious when
00:32:24.100
watching the video because assuming the passengers were all randomized and this just was some random
00:32:28.100
flight, like you could have booked it and you're little, do you know, you're on the first LGBTQ,
00:32:32.660
all LGBTQ flight. I was wondering, I was like, man, I wonder if anyone got up and walked off the
00:32:37.140
plane and said, I'm not participating in this nonsense. I'm just, I'm not participating. Of course,
00:32:42.180
you, you, you understand the backlash. I mean, you paid for the flight. You're probably not getting
00:32:46.180
refunded. Yeah. Air Canada is going to tell you, uh, that's not how it works and you're going to
00:32:51.700
have to find a new flight. So obviously there's a lot of backlash that standing up for your,
00:32:55.540
your morals isn't, isn't as easy as it seems compared to writing a comment on X. But yeah,
00:33:00.580
I mean, I do think that it, it might have to get to that level for this to be completely abolished,
00:33:06.580
but we'll see. We're definitely trending towards that. My things have changed. When I was a little
00:33:12.740
kid, we had to fly me and my family from BC out to Nova Scotia for a family event, which, you know,
00:33:19.060
we probably needed a second mortgage on the house to be able to do that. Um, they had smoking on the
00:33:23.220
plane then, and there were stairs on the plane and it was just a completely night and day situation.
00:33:30.020
Now I find people are flying a lot more often and they're speaking up a lot more often. So,
00:33:35.620
Hey, if folks have a problem with it, take it up with the company. I will say, I'm so glad
00:33:41.460
the state doesn't own this thing. So this isn't a, a government circus that we have to deal with.
00:33:46.580
Um, speaking of family, um, thank you for letting me say that word. I just slipped it out there for a
00:33:51.940
second. Sorry about that. True north. Yeah. You have to censor yourself going forward. Yeah. Um,
00:33:56.660
my point is, is that, okay, this is in Ontario, correct me if I'm wrong. No. Okay. So something,
00:34:02.740
okay. In Ontario, they were making, this is a true north exclusive. As far as I understand,
00:34:08.500
um, in Ontario, they were handing out this stuff in the school talking about what family means,
00:34:16.020
who wants to take this one away. I was, I was quite surprised by the language that were in,
00:34:21.620
that was in some of the documents here. How old were the kids and where did this happen?
00:34:25.140
Yeah. So, uh, at the water, Waterloo region, uh, district school board, uh, staff were basically
00:34:31.140
being briefed. Uh, this is a staff at a high school. They're being briefed on, uh, uh, what is, uh,
00:34:36.500
whiteness. It's basically, uh, sensitivity training, uh, for these, uh, teachers, DEI,
00:34:41.060
sensitive, uh, sensitivity training. And, uh, they were being taught what whiteness is and how to not,
00:34:46.740
uh, offend, uh, their students of minority, uh, descend, you know, black, they're black students or,
00:34:51.620
or, or, or whoever. And, uh, in this unpacking whiteness seminar, uh, one, the, the, uh,
00:34:59.220
what, one of, one of the materials they quoted from, uh, someone named Laura May Lindo. Now,
00:35:04.180
Laura May Lindo used to be an MPP in the Ontario legislature for the NDP from 2018 to 2023, before
00:35:11.380
she resigned to take up a spot at the University of Waterloo. But, uh, in a material from Laura May
00:35:17.460
Lindo, they basically state that, quote, uh, biases are the socialized teachings of, uh, white culture.
00:35:23.380
And one of these, uh, sort of biases is the assumption that people have families and, uh,
00:35:28.260
instead of, you know, assuming that people have families and saying the word family, uh,
00:35:32.580
you should, you shouldn't assume that. In fact, saying the word family is identified as harmful,
00:35:37.380
uh, by our racialized students and quote, uh, you know, apparently, uh, family implies values,
00:35:45.060
uh, positions of male authority and hierarchy, a nuclear family structure, not the same for
00:35:50.180
everyone. Uh, you know, so apparently saying family is offensive, uh, to, uh, black people.
00:35:56.260
And, you know, this is something I take personal offense to because, you know, I, I'm half Jamaican,
00:36:00.580
half Guyanese, you know, uh, I don't view myself as an, uh, being oppressed in Canada. Canada
00:36:05.620
has afforded me and my family, uh, my friends, uh, very great opportunities. And I wouldn't want to
00:36:10.820
have been, uh, born in any other country. And I wouldn't say that, you know, I, I have a family,
00:36:15.380
I have a mom and my dad and, uh, three other siblings, uh, you know, it's not like the concept
00:36:20.660
of family is foreign to myself and, uh, my friends and my family. Uh, so for, uh, these, you know,
00:36:27.700
DEI activists, these radical critical race theorists to basically assert that, uh, you know,
00:36:33.300
black people are sort of unfamiliar or even offended by the concept of family is, you know,
00:36:36.980
quite offensive. It's quite racist. It's sort of, you know, holding, you know, black people to like
00:36:41.540
a very low, uh, sort of infantile, not even it's below infantile standard. It's, it's absolutely,
00:36:48.260
it's actually kind of cruel, uh, you know, to really assume that about black people and to,
00:36:52.820
you know, think that we're so sensitive, you know, to assume that, you know, someone who maybe doesn't
00:36:57.060
have, you know, both parents in the household is going to be offended by the world word family. It's
00:37:01.620
utterly, uh, ridiculous. And, and, you know, there's more and more slides, uh, to this sort
00:37:06.020
of effect, but, uh, the idea that whiteness could sort of be identified by a certain positive
00:37:11.780
characteristics and to assume that black people are not supposed to exhibit these positive
00:37:16.660
characteristics is quite frankly racist. I don't know. How do you guys, uh, view this?
00:37:21.140
Yeah. Yeah. I always thought family was like the most important thing in my life, but little did I
00:37:27.940
know that just because I'm white, uh, I thought it was just cause how I rate, how I was raised,
00:37:31.620
how, how I came up the values that my family instilled in me, but no, it's just cause I'm
00:37:36.820
white. So that's my bad. Uh, but I mean, this is ridiculous. This is exactly the opposite of what
00:37:41.940
we should be doing as a society. It's insane. Look, there, there are clear data on this, having a
00:37:48.500
close family, having supports you can lean on, like this is going to reduce crime, going to reduce drug
00:37:52.820
use, going to reduce all the bad things you want to take away in society through a strong family.
00:37:57.300
And, and also, uh, in a more holistic perspective, we are straying away from family. Uh, we look at
00:38:03.700
the birth rates in Canada, one of the lowest in the world. I mean, this is, as I said, the exact
00:38:08.180
opposite of what we should be doing. We should be emphasizing the importance of family talk,
00:38:11.940
talking about how, how to, how to build a family, not how to, to stray away from a family. I mean,
00:38:16.340
I, I can't believe this is what, what, what, what we've become as a society. This is again,
00:38:20.740
the exact opposite of what reality should be. And in my opinion, I mean, did you agree, Chris?
00:38:26.100
Yeah, a few things here. I'm going to keep my taxpayers federation hat on for the first part,
00:38:30.980
and then I'll just give you my opinion on the second part. Uh, first off, um, I just want to
00:38:35.940
let people know in Ontario that you guys should be pushing for the ability to recall a school board.
00:38:43.060
So this doesn't work all the time. And I know it's not a panacea, but here in Alberta, we have recall
00:38:49.460
legislation at the provincial level. So at our legislature. So if an MLA is totally screwing
00:38:55.700
up his or her job, we can fire them in between elections. They don't get to just sit there until
00:39:01.860
the next election. Okay. The same thing exists at the municipal level. Now, again, really high
00:39:08.260
threshold. Premier Daniel Smith just lowered the threshold, which is good, right? But the mechanism
00:39:14.180
is there so that if something totally outrageous is happening, you can be like, yeah, no, you're out
00:39:20.180
of here. We also have it at the school board level. Okay. And the reason why this matters is because
00:39:27.380
a our kids are going to these government institutions. They're our kids. Okay. Not the government's kids.
00:39:35.540
And our taxes are paying for this. So taxes are paying for that school. Taxes are paying for the
00:39:43.940
school board. Taxes are taken by force from the families in that area. So if the families in that
00:39:53.540
area, whatever construction that happens to be, have a problem with this, they should have the ability
00:40:00.500
to fire people who are in charge of making decisions like this. So then ultimately it does come back to
00:40:08.180
the family. It does come back to the individual. This leads me to my second point within the taxpayer
00:40:13.460
federation frame. One of the things that fans of big government and more government and more control
00:40:22.660
and more socialism and more taxes. One of the things those folks like to do is to attack institutions
00:40:30.500
that make people independent and strong that are apart from government. They want mommy government
00:40:37.140
and daddy government, them to be in charge of you. They want to make the decisions. They want to take
00:40:44.260
your money. They want to decide where your kid goes to school, what your kid learns at school,
00:40:48.420
what kind of car you can drive, name it. And one of the reasons why they do this and how they do this
00:40:53.780
is they go after things like family, which of course, anyone with a shred of common sense knows
00:41:00.340
can be any construction of people who are related to each other and or love each other and support each
00:41:06.340
other financially, emotionally, spiritually, what have you within a form of household. Like people refer
00:41:13.140
to their close, tight knit friends as family. In some cases, it can be your grandma raising you.
00:41:19.380
Frankly, it's none of the government's business what form of family you have. So that's the taxpayer
00:41:26.820
federation element here of if you want lower taxes, less waste and accountable government. There are
00:41:32.900
fights here where you have to really keep an eye on this and ask yourself questions like, why is this
00:41:38.420
person doing this? To what end? What is their ultimate goal? It's not just to make people angry.
00:41:45.380
It's to actually have a purpose here. And so I would encourage people to keep that in mind that you
00:41:50.740
guys should have control, more control over your school boards in Ontario. I would push for that.
00:41:56.260
Push for school choice so that the funding follows the kid and you guys can get charter schools going on
00:42:01.780
there in Ontario. Okay. In a bigger way and push for the ability to recall people at school boards. Now
00:42:08.260
is just kind of a little story that I have. And it's from a Gen X perspective. I grew up in the 80s.
00:42:16.740
I would encourage people who really truly value diversity. Okay. Go back and watch TV shows from the
00:42:24.740
80s. Seriously. Watch Different Strokes. Watch Family Ties. Watch Full House. Watch Star Trek The
00:42:32.900
Next Generation. You will see everyone represented there all the time, including combinations of
00:42:39.860
family. Watch Fresh Prince of Bel-Air. Watch all of these shows. Thank you. The Cosby Show. Okay. Watch these
00:42:46.820
shows because there's sometimes I'll have some of my kids friends over and I'll have something like this
00:42:52.420
playing and they'll, they'll be, they're shocked at the diversity and the love and understanding
00:42:58.820
and the, you know, responsibility and we're all going to help each other out. All of those narratives
00:43:03.540
which were there and people weren't freaking out about them back then. I don't know why it seems to be,
00:43:10.420
again, getting back to government and it's interesting she's a former provincial parliament, uh,
00:43:14.740
parliamentarian, why it is now that some of these folks are just constantly trying to stoke division.
00:43:20.740
My spidey sense tells me because they want the ability to have more tax and control over you
00:43:25.140
guys. Am I just drinking the Kool-Aid here guys? No, I think you're absolutely right. I think,
00:43:30.420
you know, look during the 1960s, uh, there was extremely, extremely valid reasons for black people
00:43:38.180
to rise up and, you know, state the injustices that were happening, but there was a sort of
00:43:42.980
establishment that was created in the 40s, 50s, 60s, and it sort of lived on and sort of passed
00:43:49.620
its usefulness and they sort of pivoted, uh, to a new fight. It isn't a fight for, uh, legal equality.
00:43:56.340
It isn't a fight against racism. It's a fight for anti-racism. It's a fight for, uh, legal preferences,
00:44:02.980
uh, for minorities. It's really, uh, turned into sort of a perversive, uh, you know, a group of people who,
00:44:09.700
you know, really don't care about, uh, you know, anti-discrimination. They really care about,
00:44:14.980
you know, getting one sort of racial group ahead of another and sort of, uh, you know,
00:44:20.100
looking at some of the problems of these racial groups and pawning off responsibility from these
00:44:24.900
individuals and from these families and towards the government. At the end of the day, uh, having
00:44:29.620
a free society where the individual, uh, is, you know, emphasized also does mean that the individual
00:44:35.380
has to bear that responsibility. And instead of, uh, that sort of vision for society,
00:44:40.100
they want one where the government has a lot more control over the lives of certain individuals
00:44:44.740
so that they can get sort of certain, uh, racial outcomes. And this results in sort of looking at,
00:44:50.820
uh, data, uh, for family formation on different races and seeing that black people have a problem
00:44:57.140
when it comes to, uh, uh, multi-parent, uh, households. Uh, a lot of black people are raised
00:45:02.580
in single parent households. And instead of trying to communicate some sort of strategies,
00:45:07.460
uh, that black people can, uh, utilize to, uh, have more sustainable family structures to
00:45:12.580
have both parents in the household, uh, which does lead to many outcomes. It leads to
00:45:17.140
a lower rate of incarceration for children. Uh, it leads to higher, a better economic outcomes for
00:45:22.100
children. It leads to children to actually be, uh, you know, uh, scoring higher in intelligence metrics.
00:45:28.100
Uh, there's all these, uh, benefits to having both parents in the household. And instead of
00:45:32.260
trying to, you know, communicate those strategies, they instead say, well, actually, uh, you know,
00:45:37.140
having, uh, you know, one parent in the household is actually, you know, a good thing, you know,
00:45:41.380
or actually, you know, we should, uh, you know, condemn people who suggest that having, uh,
00:45:46.340
two parents in the household is a good thing. It's absolutely, uh, ridiculous. Uh, it is
00:45:51.140
counterproductive. Uh, I, I think it is, uh, insidious, uh, in some respect, and it's something that
00:45:56.980
I'm always going to fight against, then, uh, I think a lot of people are always going to fight
00:46:00.020
against, uh, uh, you know, these absolutely, uh, radical, uh, anti-racist activists that still
00:46:06.260
have a lot of power in Canadian society, even though, uh, their power looks to be diminishing.
00:46:11.780
Isaac?
00:46:13.460
Yeah. Uh, I guess I can just taking it to the government, uh, perspective. I, I said family
00:46:19.300
was the most important thing to me, which may have been slightly incorrect because I think
00:46:23.380
what even eclipses that is freedom. And what I've seen in the other over the last few years here is
00:46:30.580
there really seems to be two groups of people, those who value freedom and those who want the
00:46:35.300
government to control their lives, which to me is just shocking. How could, and maybe it's not as
00:46:40.740
conscious as that. It's just some sort of subconscious thing where, where it comes down to work or whatever,
00:46:46.580
but I just don't understand how, how you could reach that conclusion that really you want the
00:46:50.900
government to have more control of your lives. You don't want, you don't want freedom over,
00:46:55.940
over everything. Like it just, I I've never been able to wrap my head around that and maybe some
00:47:00.660
people can, but certainly I can't. And, and yeah, I, everything I do in my life is to gain more
00:47:07.060
freedom, not, not less. So I re I really don't understand that, that ideology.
00:47:11.860
I'll finish off with this exact point and you're both right. And I sincerely appreciate your input on
00:47:16.900
this because it's just one of those things that really gets to people and it can kind of erode
00:47:21.700
your confidence in things like family and things like having your own independence and your own
00:47:25.780
freedom. And I just want to encourage people a bit of a blue pill here. Um, just make sure that you
00:47:31.220
defend your freedom. Okay. And if you don't have it, demand it. And in the case of Ontario, if you guys
00:47:36.660
don't like what school boards are doing and what they're teaching your kid insist, call up premier Doug Ford
00:47:43.860
and say, we need to change how we function as a government here with schools. We want recall
00:47:49.380
legislation at the school board level in this case. So parents, people who have kids, adults,
00:47:56.180
responsible adults and guardians can make choices for their own kid and have the freedom to do that.
00:48:03.140
To your point exactly, Isaac, I will point this out. Some folks, I don't know, for whatever reason,
00:48:09.620
do prefer more control. They prefer kind of group control. All of that understood.
00:48:17.220
They're free. I'm not kidding to join a collective. Like seriously, they, there are, there are little
00:48:24.100
towns across Canada where they kind of work in co-op. It's more of a collective, you know, village
00:48:30.340
council decides on things. Okay. Like what they're going to grow for a crop this year. Like you can choose
00:48:36.740
to go live your life that way. If they want to rule that only e-bikes are allowed downtown and
00:48:41.940
they're going to ban gas, they, they can do stuff like that. Go figure it out. Go live that way.
00:48:47.780
If you choose to stop inflicting it on other people. Why would you inflict your choices on other people
00:48:54.580
in this manner? And so I, again, because it winds up taking away your freedom and your money,
00:49:00.820
getting it back quickly to taxpayers to sign off here. About half of our incomes. Now folks are
00:49:07.220
going to various levels of government, including school boards like this one in Ontario. Okay.
00:49:13.460
About half do this project. Imagine yourself. Okay. If it's safe to do so, you're not driving,
00:49:19.220
close your eyes, picture what lands in your bank account. If you're on salary every two weeks.
00:49:24.340
Okay. People would say a paycheck, but most of it's electronic. Now every two weeks, double it,
00:49:31.620
what could you do with that money? Could you afford more nutritious food? Could you afford to maybe
00:49:36.900
send your kid to a private school? Could you get them those lessons they've always wanted? Could you
00:49:41.300
save up for a house? Double that money that lands into your account every two weeks.
00:49:46.100
That's how much the government is taking from you in taxes. Okay. And doing stuff like this with it.
00:49:52.100
So this is why we fight here at the Canadian Taxpayers Federation. Guys, I sincerely appreciate your
00:49:57.300
contributions today to the show. It's been a really good show. Folks, thank you so much for
00:50:01.380
listening and for watching. If you have any comments, please leave them underneath this video.
00:50:07.220
And remember, everything is off the record.
00:50:09.860
Chris, I was just featuring someone calling Ford and saying, Hey Ford, I saw what you said about
00:50:19.300
Carney being Santa Claus. Maybe you could be Santa Claus too. Recall legislation for municipalities,
00:50:23.940
recall legislation for the province, recall legislation for the school boards. Everyone
00:50:28.100
gets recall legislation. Yeah, I think instead of governing during the November and December months,
00:50:34.980
he should just do a cross a province tour of him as Santa Claus, go to all the significant
00:50:40.260
shopping malls in the in the province and just, you know, have to have the kids come up on his lap.
00:50:45.140
He must. I think he'd be really good at that. I don't know about the whole pre wearing thing,
00:50:49.940
but Santa Claus. Yeah, I definitely see that in his career prospects. He can deliver freedom to the
00:50:55.860
good boys and girls. Oh, well, no, it actually will say each box, each president will say $10,000
00:51:02.260
of debt. Here you go, child. Here, you want another? Here, here, I'll give you another $10,000. There,
00:51:08.340
there you go. It's $28,000, but yeah. All right, that was really good, you guys.
Link copied!