ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- May 18, 2022
Foreign election interference “clearly undermined our democracy” – Royal Military College professor
Episode Stats
Length
3 minutes
Words per Minute
139.88269
Word Count
477
Sentence Count
16
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
00:00:00.000
Dr. Luprecht, are you aware of what happened to my colleague Kenny Chu in the last election,
00:00:05.140
primarily because he introduced a bill to propose making this foreign influence registry?
00:00:11.460
I'm aware of some of the online activity that was directed at your colleague,
00:00:16.980
and I also believe that that activity had a material influence on the outcome in that particular writing.
00:00:25.740
So there was a McGill study, I'm sure you might be aware of it, that said the overall election,
00:00:32.140
they said it didn't have a material impact, but at certain writing levels,
00:00:36.120
they can't discount that it had a material impact on the election.
00:00:38.980
Would you say that he was one of the ridings, primarily because he brought forward this bill
00:00:43.620
that was targeted by foreign disinformation campaigns to defeat an incumbent candidate in a Canadian election?
00:00:52.180
Yeah, I think it clearly undermined our democracy, and it was quite nefarious
00:00:57.560
because the activity, as you well know, was conducted in language, in neither English nor French,
00:01:02.840
it was primarily conducted in a third language, a language in which our security, intelligence,
00:01:08.180
and law enforcement agencies have rather limited capabilities,
00:01:13.240
nor did we have a plan of how we would actively identify such influence activity and be able to counter it.
00:01:20.920
And so, yes, it was, I think it is a canary in the coal mine of what any member of Parliament faces
00:01:26.880
when they actively engage in activity that displeases some of our adversaries.
00:01:31.820
That's great. You know, I can understand, you know, I'm reading the 2021 Elections Canada report,
00:01:36.580
and, you know, they sort of talk about misinformation and disinformation,
00:01:39.800
but it seems like they're really downplaying the impact of disinformation and information,
00:01:44.500
saying, you know, that Canadians can trust the election,
00:01:46.740
and I think overall, the vast majority, we can trust the election,
00:01:50.500
but we know how sometimes elections in Canada can literally be decided by a single riding
00:01:55.220
or a single handful of ridings.
00:01:57.600
Do you think that Elections Canada needs to take this more seriously,
00:02:01.460
and even, not only in their reports after the fact, but even during an election,
00:02:05.860
to alert Canadians that there is a disinformation campaign being conducted during the election?
00:02:10.960
It's not an online problem. This is a longstanding problem in Canada,
00:02:16.140
where riding associations are captured by certain entities that are either close to certain countries,
00:02:22.460
to certain ethnic groups, to certain religious groups.
00:02:24.820
So what I would say is that the online attempts at clear interference in our democratic processes
00:02:32.620
is simply a continuation of a longstanding problem that is related to riding its constituency association levels
00:02:41.740
and not sufficient attention, but also not efficient constraints.
00:02:47.320
Do you think Elections Canada should have done more?
00:02:50.200
I'm sorry, we're out of time.
00:02:51.020
Absolutely.
00:02:51.700
Thank you.
00:02:52.040
Thank you very much.
00:02:53.380
I would now like...
00:02:54.620
Thank you.
Link copied!