Juno News - January 06, 2026Freeland’s Ukraine side-gig sparks conflict-of-interest uproar
Episode Stats
Words per minute
159.19994
Harmful content
Misogyny
10
sentences flagged
Summary
Learn English with Justin Trudeau. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau speaks to the media about the Venezuelan crisis, his plans for a new pipeline to the Pacific Coast, and the departure of Chrystia Freeland, who has accepted a role as Ukraine's economic advisor.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Well, Prime Minister Carney is in no rush to build a new Canadian pipeline to the Pacific
00:00:09.500
despite the sudden availability of all that Venezuelan oil to our biggest customer, the
00:00:15.320
United States. Since the arrest of dictator Nicolas Maduro, some analysts in Canada say
00:00:20.760
Venezuelan crude might soon replace Canadian exports of oil to the United States. We could
00:00:27.640
lose our main customer. In a letter to the Prime Minister, Conservative Party leader Pierre
00:00:32.540
Polyev wrote, the removal of Maduro and possible end to American sanctions on Venezuelan oil
00:00:39.140
could eventually displace some of Canada's oil exports to our biggest customer. Polyev
00:00:46.080
says it's time we race to approve a pipeline to the Pacific coast and break our dependency
00:00:51.600
on the American market. But the Prime Minister says Canada remains a reliable supplier of
00:00:57.220
oil to the United States. And that's not about to change.
00:01:00.280
President Trump has said one of the key reasons that he went into Venezuela was to get the
00:01:04.560
oil out. Do you think this will impact the Canadian oil sector? And does that increase the need
00:01:09.200
in your estimation to have a pipeline to the northwest coast of BC?
00:01:12.120
It's been our view, and we're working towards this, that Canadian oil will be competitive because
00:01:18.100
it is low risk, clearly low risk, low cost, the marginal cost. There's been huge progress in
00:01:26.340
getting down the cost. And low carbon, which is what the Pathways Project carbon capture will
00:01:32.480
bring. And that makes Canadian oil competitive, Canadian oil competitive for the medium and long
00:01:37.440
term. So we welcome the prospect of peace, peaceful transition, democratic Venezuela. We welcome the prospect
00:01:46.560
of greater prosperity in Venezuela. But we also see the competitiveness of Canadian oil. And we're
00:01:54.080
investing or we're putting in place measures so that that's going to happen. And in that context,
00:02:01.200
a pipeline and exports to Asia, we've got competitive product, and we'd be diversifying our markets. And
00:02:11.120
that's one of the reasons why we signed the comprehensive MOU with Alberta. So we'll be working towards that.
00:02:16.560
So the Prime Minister also weighed in on the fate of MP Chrystia Freeland, who has accepted a role
00:02:22.160
as Ukraine's economic advisor. Freeland posted this on X. Ukraine is at the forefront of today's
00:02:30.000
global fight for democracy. And I welcome the chance to contribute on an unpaid basis as an economic
00:02:36.480
advisor to President Zelensky. In accepting this voluntary position, I will be stepping aside from my role
00:02:43.040
as the Prime Minister's special representative for the reconstruction of Ukraine. In the coming weeks,
00:02:49.040
I will also leave my seat in Parliament. But for now, Freeland is still an MP. And even the CBC is asking
00:02:58.560
the obvious question, who is Freeland actually working for right now?
00:03:02.560
You ponder now a situation where, yes, the two countries are allies, but their interests may not
00:03:08.880
always perfectly align. And it's unclear how Freeland can sit on both sides of the table at the same time,
00:03:17.040
without being in a position of a conflict of interest. To this point, we have asked the Prime
00:03:23.040
Minister's office to clarify exactly which government Chrystia Freeland is working for at the moment,
00:03:28.800
ahead of the Coalition of the Willing talks in Paris tomorrow.
00:03:34.240
Now, Carney says, any questions about her continued role as a member for Rosedale
00:03:40.240
were settled once she accepted the appointment from Ukraine? Let's listen.
00:03:43.600
Ms. Freeland was on yesterday as your special representative. Did you ask her not to quit
00:03:47.280
because of the minority Parliament situation right now?
00:03:55.360
Let me... No, just to be clear, just to be clear. Ms. Freeland, Chrystia has served our country
00:04:04.480
for well over a decade in a formal role as a parliamentarian, certainly in a number of ministerial
00:04:10.560
posts and served with great distinction. She was... I had her as my special envoy after she left
00:04:19.200
cabinet for the Ukraine reconstruction. Judgment became her judgment that she could be more useful
00:04:27.200
for that process as she was leaving, as she was retiring as a parliamentarian, as a direct advisor.
00:04:34.640
My judgment was that taking that role would be consistent with resigning as an MP,
00:04:42.000
and I welcomed her doing that, and I'm pleased that for Ukraine.
00:04:48.160
So, the loss of an MP means the Kearney Liberal government will be one more member shy of a majority
00:04:55.200
in parliament. Conservatives say Liberals are stepping up. They're pushed to lure opposition members over to
00:05:00.880
the government side. MP Scott Anderson of Vernon, B.C. was approached and released this letter saying,
00:05:06.960
he told the Liberals, what are you going to offer, or rather, what are you going to try and bribe the
00:05:15.680
next Conservative MP with? A stinging reference to ex-Conservative MPs Chris Dantremont and Michael Ma.
00:05:24.480
Anderson went on to say, it'll be a cold day in hell before I even consider betraying my constituents,
00:05:31.280
and you should probably stop asking because I will certainly advertise it every time you try.
00:05:36.960
We're now joined by Duff Conacher, co-founder of Democracy Watch, an ethics watchdog. Welcome, Duff.
00:05:46.000
Let's start off talking about Chrystia Freeland and the whole question about around who she works for
00:05:51.760
right now. She, as you know, has accepted this role as economic advisor to Ukraine. The problem,
00:05:57.360
of course, is she's also a sitting member of parliament. And yes, we know she's going to quit.
0.99
00:06:02.640
We don't exactly know when she's going to quit. She should be quitting immediately, but there are
0.76
00:06:07.120
things that she is doing that potentially put her out of conflict of interest. What do you make of
00:06:11.440
this situation? Yes, she actually should have quit before the position was confirmed. And right now,
00:06:18.880
she's in violation of the MPs code, which has a rule that says you can't improperly further
00:06:27.120
another person's or entity's private interests. And it's very narrow, the MPs code. It does cover
00:06:36.880
financial interests though. And she's been an economic advisor to the government of the Ukraine.
00:06:42.720
And of course, her advice will affect all businesses in the Ukraine if they are able to do economic
00:06:49.280
development. And that's furthering the financial interests of the government and those other
00:06:54.880
entities, those other businesses and organizations in the Ukraine. And it's clearly improper. She took an
00:07:02.080
oath of allegiance to Canada when she became an MP and does so after every election again.
00:07:12.480
And as well, it's just improper to have this conflict of interest between her role as an MP
00:07:18.000
representing voters in Canada and her role advising another foreign government.
00:07:22.640
Yeah, you get the sense that she thinks that the interests of Ukraine and Canada are exactly the
00:07:28.800
same, but they're obviously not. We're two different countries, two different interests.
00:07:33.440
I mean, you're either serving the interests of Canadian taxpayers who are paying you, by the way,
00:07:38.480
or you're serving the interests of the Ukraine. And the other part of this is that the fact that she
00:07:42.880
didn't accept a salary, I mean, I suspect that there are some financial perks in there somewhere,
00:07:48.400
if you look at the contract. But she seems to think that that's maybe a factor here,
00:07:53.360
because if you read what she says in accepting this voluntary position, I will be stepping aside
00:07:59.280
from my role as the Prime Minister's Special Representative for the reconstruction of Ukraine.
00:08:04.880
In the coming weeks, I will also leave my seat in Parliament. I mean, does it matter that this is
00:08:09.280
a voluntary position, an unpaid position, or not?
00:08:12.640
No, it doesn't matter at all. You can still have a conflict of interest just based on
00:08:18.160
relationships and the interests that you are representing. And the past ethics commissioners
00:08:25.040
have ruled that interests go beyond financial. And as well, she's representing the financial
00:08:36.480
interests of the Ukraine because she's advising on economic development. So there is a financial
00:08:42.800
factor in there, even though it may not be personal for her. I'm guessing her expenses are going to be
00:08:48.000
covered. If she goes to the Ukraine, she's not likely to be paying for that herself. And she had to
00:08:54.800
leave the position, the Cabinet position of the Special Advisor to the Prime Minister on the Ukraine,
00:09:01.440
the Special Envoy. And she did that yesterday, but she's still sitting as an MP. So there's different
00:09:07.840
rules for members of Cabinet. And if she had stayed in that position, she would have been violating those
00:09:12.960
rules. But she's still violating MPs have their own separate ethics code, and she's still violating the
0.95
00:09:19.040
rules in that. She said she got advice from the ethics commissioner's office. The ethics commissioner
00:09:24.240
treats that advice as confidential. And if the ethics commissioner cleared it, the ethics commissioners
00:09:30.640
created a giant loophole in the federal ethics rules, essentially saying you can represent a foreign
00:09:37.680
government while being an MP. So hopefully we're going to file a complaint about it. Democracy Watch
00:09:42.800
is, and hopefully an MP will file it as well. That will force a ruling from the ethics commissioner that
00:09:47.600
can be challenged in court. And if the ethics commissioner's ruling is that this is fine,
00:09:52.960
then Democracy Watch will go to court and challenge that ruling because it's clearly not. It's technically
00:09:58.880
legal under the oath of allegiance. It doesn't say that you can't do other work. It's technically legal
00:10:04.160
under our foreign interference laws, which have a huge loophole in them that really should say MPs cannot
00:10:09.120
be representing foreign governments or entities. But under the MPs ethics code, I think it's a clear
00:10:15.040
violation and the ethics commissioner should rule that and find her guilty now. She should have resigned
1.00
00:10:21.040
before and she's violated the code by not doing that. And the longer she stays along, it's just extending
00:10:27.840
the violation. Yeah, and she's continuing to get paid. I get the sense that she's
1.00
00:10:34.160
stretching this out so she can keep, you know, collecting that sweet salary of hers.
1.00
00:10:38.640
I think that's part of it. I think the other part is the government is close to a majority.
00:10:46.240
If they can get a conservative MP or MP from another party to switch over, they'd have a majority.
00:10:53.120
If she leaves, then it's a by-election. That seat is, if she resigns, that seat's vacant. So she can't
0.99
00:10:59.440
vote any longer with the government. And that's advancing the private interests of the Liberal
00:11:05.120
Party, which is improper as well, to be sitting there as an MP in a conflict of interest. And why
00:11:10.480
are you sticking around? You're sticking around so that your party can ram through parliament,
00:11:16.480
whatever it wants, and also derail a bunch of investigations that are going on at committees.
00:11:22.080
Because if the Liberals get a majority, the Liberals will have a majority on every
00:11:25.600
committee and all the good work that committees are doing right now holding the government to
00:11:29.440
account will stop. So that, again, that's a conflict of interest if she's sticking around
00:11:35.440
for that reason, because she's furthering improperly the interests of the Liberal Party,
00:11:40.320
as opposed to upholding the public interest, which is what you're supposed to do as an MP.
00:11:45.280
Yeah, I think what's going on in committees is an excellent point. And the Liberals would love to
00:11:52.080
tax. And I think that's one of the reasons why they're pushing so hard to lure Conservatives over.
00:11:57.600
And I'll get to that in a minute. But first of all, I want to just end this discussion around
00:12:04.480
Chrystia Freeland, because I think ultimately the buck stops with the Prime Minister, doesn't it?
00:12:08.560
I mean, shouldn't he dismiss her rather than wait for her to resign?
00:12:14.400
He certainly could kick her out of caucus for this, because it's a clear violation of the MP code.
0.70
00:12:20.320
There are no penalties for violating the MP's ethics code, just like there's no penalties when
00:12:24.640
cabinet ministers or top government officials violate the key ethics rules in the federal
00:12:29.120
government ethics law. It's crazy, but politicians write these codes and laws for themselves and they
00:12:35.040
don't put in penalties. But if as what should happen, the ethics commissioner finds her guilty of
00:12:42.560
violating the ethics code, well, does Mark Carney want to wear that? So he should tell her you resign
00:12:48.720
now or I'm kicking you out of caucus because I think it's a violation. You're violating fundamental
00:12:54.960
rules that protect democratic government and you're not going to be able to stay in caucus
00:13:00.320
as a result. And if he doesn't do that, he should wear it. Her conflict is his conflict,
00:13:06.000
because he's accepting it. And it wouldn't be surprising from him. He has a deeply unethical
00:13:10.960
attitude towards governing. We know that because he is in a financial conflict of interest himself,
00:13:17.040
because of his million dollars of stock options in Brookfield, while he's sitting there making
00:13:23.120
decisions that affect companies within the Brookfield conglomerate almost weekly. Any
00:13:28.000
decision he makes about businesses in Canada affects Brookfield. And he's invested in Brookfield
00:13:34.640
and knows he's invested in Brookfield and has a sham not blind trust and a sham unethical smokescreen
00:13:42.000
and says and is fine with that and says this whole cover up that he's doing is fine. So I wouldn't be
00:13:47.360
surprised if he's also fine with Christy Freeland breaking the fundamental ethics rules.
00:13:52.080
Yeah. When you look at Ukraine and the rebuilding of that country, once this war ends,
00:13:57.200
I mean, this thing is going to stink to high heaven because of course Brookfield will want to play a
00:14:01.600
huge role along with other companies like BlackRock, for instance, in the trillion dollar operation
00:14:07.840
that is going to be the rebuilding of this destroyed country of Ukraine. And as Brookfield, of course,
00:14:17.040
plays a role in that. Canada will have a role in that through its government and then Carney will be
00:14:23.440
able to enrich himself through that whole rebuilding process in Ukraine. I mean, and of course,
00:14:28.320
they've got Christy over there as well, you know, advising the Ukrainians. The whole thing is just
00:14:33.680
not good. Optically speaking alone, it's just horrible. It is. And we'll see whether she does
00:14:42.240
the right thing very soon. But she stayed one day as MP and so she's violated the law and should be
0.75
00:14:49.520
found guilty of violating the MP's ethics code as a result. But the longer she stays, it's just going to
0.76
00:14:57.280
continue and compound the violation and the conflict of interest. Let's talk about the Liberals now
00:15:04.000
luring Conservatives. I mean, this is unsavory. I think a lot of Canadians are going to look
00:15:09.360
at this and find the whole thing extremely troubling. You know, it's going to breed a sense of cynicism that
00:15:16.640
these people can play musical chairs, you know, based on whatever the government party is dangling
00:15:22.960
before some of these opposition members. Can you talk a little bit about your view around the ethical
00:15:28.000
concerns of luring Conservatives or any other member over to the government side?
00:15:34.960
Yeah, well, first of all, there is also in the MP's ethics code, some expectations. And MPs are expected
00:15:41.520
to act with honesty and uphold the public's confidence and trust in the integrity of themselves and the
00:15:47.920
House of Commons overall. And so I think when an MP crosses the floor, it's dishonest. If you have run
00:15:57.360
for a party, taken your oath under that party as an MP, thanked your voters, the voters from that party
00:16:05.200
for voting for you, and then you vote with that party for months, as Chris Dontremont did, the Halifax MP
00:16:11.680
that switched and also criticized the governing party very strongly as both he and Michael Ma,
00:16:20.240
the other Liberal Conservative MP who have switched to the Liberals. I think that's a violation of the
00:16:25.040
code. Unfortunately, those rules in the code, again, MPs drafted these rules themselves. They just say
00:16:31.920
they're expectations, not requirements. And the ethics commissioner has talked out of both sides of
00:16:37.680
his mouth, this guy, Conrad von Finkenstein, who was handpicked in secret by the Trudeau cabinet.
00:16:43.520
He said it's a requirement to follow these rules of avoid apparent conflicts of interest, act with
00:16:48.800
honesty, uphold the public's confidence and trust. But then we filed a complaint about Dontremont switching,
00:16:55.280
saying it was dishonest and didn't, you know, shattered the voters trust that have voted for him in
00:17:00.960
Halifax. And I know other voters from Halifax area wrote as well to the ethics commissioner. Sorry,
00:17:10.240
I'm saying Halifax, Nova Scotia. He's not directly from Halifax, Chris Dontremont. And the ethics
00:17:16.160
commissioner said, Oh, no, those rules are not enforceable. So he said they were enforceable in
00:17:20.000
his annual report last spring. And then now he says they're unenforceable. If there was an offer from
00:17:25.920
the liberals of some sort of favor in return for switching, that's illegal, that's bribery. And also
00:17:32.960
it's a violation of the MPs ethics code to, to switch on that basis, because you would be advancing
00:17:39.760
your personal private interests by switching. So we haven't had evidence come out so far of the
00:17:45.360
liberals actually offering directly a job, a cabinet post, even being a committee chair, you get paid
00:17:53.840
more. If you're an MP, we haven't had that. And there hasn't been a direct connection. But if those
00:18:01.680
rewards come later, then we will be filing complaints that that for an investigation by police to
00:18:10.720
investigate whether that offer was on the table before the MP switched because it's bribery and it's
00:18:16.640
illegal. Yeah, I mean, that's exactly what it is. And now we see this BC conservative from
00:18:23.520
Vernon, Scott Anderson, shaming the liberals for doing it. Maybe that's a good approach here,
00:18:29.120
saying, you know, and publishing a letter, you know, basically just constituents saying,
00:18:33.840
I was, I was approached, I told them where to go and challenge them basically to answer the question,
00:18:40.160
you know, what are you going to offer the next conservative MP to join your ranks? Of course,
00:18:46.400
which is blatant bribery. I mean, at what point do the police get involved in this sort of thing, Duff?
00:18:52.720
Well, unfortunately, in the past, they haven't gotten involved. Back in 2005, 2006, with the biggest
00:19:00.320
case being cases being David, David Emerson, switching from the liberals to the conservatives and
00:19:06.720
and Belinda Stronick and the switch there. And there was lots of evidence that they were guaranteed
00:19:14.160
cabinet posts if they switched. And so you're paid as an MP, you're paid much more as a cabinet minister.
00:19:20.880
And so they were offered a financial benefit to switch. And that was bribery. And the people doing
00:19:27.840
the negotiating at that time and the offers should have been charged and prosecuted. And unfortunately,
00:19:34.160
they weren't. So we'll see what happens in this situation and where it goes from here. I'm hoping
00:19:42.480
as well that some liberals will stand up on principle. If this does continue to happen and the liberals get
00:19:49.600
a majority through these very smelly defections, I hope liberal MPs will leave caucus and some of them
00:19:57.600
will show that they actually believe in democratic principles and will leave caucus and citizen
00:20:01.680
independence and deny Prime Minister Carney the majority. Because you should win a majority in
00:20:08.000
election, not through luring MPs to switch and their dishonest, unethical actions of switching after
00:20:17.680
running and being elected under another party's banner.
00:20:21.280
Yeah. And liberals should be upset by this because if conservatives are being offered things like cabinet
00:20:26.960
posts and other goodies, then those are things that are not going to die hard liberals. The loyal liberals,
00:20:35.040
people who thought they were on the winning side, but are seeing conservatives getting goodies
00:20:43.920
that they should be getting by all rights as the party in charge.
00:20:48.960
Yes. And they should be upset about it just generally. Mark Carney is not following the liberals'
00:20:55.120
platform from the election. Stephen Dubot has already left as environment, formerly environment minister and
00:21:02.720
more recently heritage minister. He's left cabinet. I would hope he and some other liberals would
00:21:09.280
stand up on principle and say, no, I don't support getting a majority this way. I'm going to leave
00:21:15.200
caucus and maybe I'll vote for you in the House of Commons still with the liberals. But that would at
00:21:21.520
least ensure that the opposition parties control committees. And that's really what Mark Carney's after.
00:21:27.440
Yeah. The ethics committee has been looking into Brookfield and the Conflict of Interest Act and
00:21:33.920
changing that act to essentially prohibit what Carney's doing, which is secretly profiting from his own
00:21:40.160
decisions as prime minister through his investments in Brookfield and making decisions that affect those
00:21:47.760
investments. And he would love to end that and many other committee hearings that are going on now.
00:21:54.400
If liberal MPs leave, then the liberals don't have majority and opposition parties still continue those
00:22:01.920
committees and those investigations and reviews of key democracy laws will continue.
00:22:08.720
So we'll see what happens. We need a law, of course, to ban MPs from switching unless a few things happen.
00:22:16.480
If a party leader did violate every promise made in the last election, then I think an MP could justify
00:22:22.640
switching and they'd have to file with the Ethics Commissioner and the Ethics Commissioner would
00:22:27.040
make a ruling on doing that. Or if a party leader changes and the new party leader takes it in a
00:22:33.840
totally different direction, then you should be able to leave as an MP, but not join another party.
00:22:37.680
You should go and sit as an independent until the next election or otherwise you should have to resign
00:22:45.520
Absolutely. How do people support the great work you do at Democracy Watch?
00:22:49.920
We'll see everything at democracywatch.ca. We welcome donations and also people sending letters
00:22:56.240
calling for these many key changes that we need to actually have a democracy.
00:22:59.920
Jeff Conacher, thank you so much for coming on the show.
00:23:05.040
And that is it for this edition of Straight Up. Appreciate you tuning in, my friends. Let's do it