Juno News - October 15, 2023


How Covid theatre destroyed public trust in science

Mentioned
Could vaccine mandates return for air travel? (ft. Eva Chipiuk) NDP members think Jagmeet Singh isn't getting enough out of deal with Liberals

Episode Stats


Length

11 minutes

Words per minute

181.45

Word count

2,025

Sentence count

—

Harmful content

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode of the Andrew Lawton Show, host Andrew Lawton is joined by Dr. Ken Green, a senior fellow with the Fraser Institute, to discuss the dangers of unscientific government policies and practices.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 you're tuned in to the andrew lawton show
00:00:05.920 it's funny when i talk about these issues which were i mean the dominant issues in the canadian
00:00:13.120 political landscape for uh the better part of three years they do seem like relics of a bygone
00:00:19.020 era and i think they are and i think it's a good thing that mandates are now just seen as so distant
00:00:25.280 and so past and so old that we're not going to bring them back uh the government of alberta
00:00:29.980 yesterday i got a bit nervous because i saw a headline that it was reimposing masking restrictions
00:00:34.640 in health care environments but then you look at the fine print and you realize they're really just
00:00:39.480 saying yeah but any individual hospital can come up with its own policy and override what was sort
00:00:44.700 of a baseline that alberta health services was putting forward now whether they should have
00:00:49.000 done it at all is something that you can discuss and debate but the whole point is is that we cannot
00:00:53.880 allow uh the very unscientific way government approach these things to stand without being
00:01:00.800 challenged and this is why i've been a proponent of an inquiry and this is not to besmirch the the
00:01:06.320 work that people involved with the national citizens inquiry are doing but the uh final product the
00:01:11.180 final report will really have no basis in law will not be a matter of the public record in terms of the
00:01:17.700 government's uh approach to this so i i think we do need to have these discussions still kenneth
00:01:22.880 green has done a tremendous job he is a uh senior fellow with the fraser institute and has a piece
00:01:28.960 out covet 19 hygiene theater masks and lockdowns solid science in quotation marks or science veneer
00:01:37.120 uh dr kenneth green joins us now it's uh good to talk to you again kenneth thanks for coming back on
00:01:42.240 good to be with you uh you know science is something that is not a one-size-fits-all solution i i think
00:01:48.880 it's a process and it's one that people will learn from and adapt and you bring in new evidence and
00:01:55.280 you revise your hypotheses and conclusions the scientific process though i'd say took a bit of
00:02:00.640 a bludgeoning over the last three years didn't it it did i mean and you put your finger on a very
00:02:06.000 important point which is uh people misunderstand what science is uh that we talk about the science and and
00:02:14.080 there is no such thing as the science any more than there is the flow of water it's a it's a process
00:02:20.560 right and so it's a process it really what it is it's it's trial and error formalized it's formalized
00:02:27.440 trial and error learning that is you you create a hypothesis you do an experiment you publish it
00:02:33.520 or you repeat it you test it you come to conclusions you publish it somebody else tests that
00:02:37.840 and it's a it's a integrated trial and error learning but it's not it's not a authority
00:02:43.280 authoritative voice at any given time in fact almost all of the studies that are being done will be wrong
00:02:50.880 right they'll be they will not be repeated and they will not be confirmed uh and so so when when
00:02:57.280 people invoke this this entity of that we're following the science uh that's not a thing that's a
00:03:04.080 they may construct in their mind what size is at any given moment but but it's not really a thing
00:03:09.200 and the thing is governments when they did this uh created a real problem because they they gave
00:03:15.760 people the illusion that there was this fixed body of knowledge where all people all scientists come
00:03:21.360 together and say vote and say this is reality and that and there and and that the government was was
00:03:27.600 just following that um but of course looking back if you actually look back at the literature that
00:03:32.640 existed at the time the the body of scientific literature which is a real thing if you looked
00:03:39.120 at that uh at the time that they were making their decisions to impose masking to impose social
00:03:43.680 distancing to impose stay home stay safe uh three months to flatten the curve you know three weeks
00:03:50.080 to fly the curve three months to flatten the curve three years to flatten the curve um if you look back
00:03:55.520 at the actual literature that was published at the time as the group called the cochran library has done
00:04:02.160 formally what you find is there was no evidence that any of those measures would reduce the transmission
00:04:08.800 of covid or the severity of covid uh or the the duration of covid um or which which parts of the
00:04:17.920 population were affected by covid um the the evidence was very very uh very very weak and and inconsistent um
00:04:25.920 but most and mostly negative mostly that the uh that is found as the biological common sense would tell
00:04:33.440 you uh viruses um are not affected by much viruses are a force of nature they're like earthquakes and and
00:04:42.720 tornadoes it's it's it's it's very difficult for humans to influence a virus that is passing through a
00:04:48.320 population of any kind uh and so um yeah so so yeah i think we have a problem with regard to and i
00:04:56.480 the issue of how governments portrayed what they were doing with regard to science because they
00:05:01.440 corrupted uh science they corrupted people's understanding of science they corrupted faith 0.98
00:05:06.880 or belief in science that that science is a good way of knowing uh and i think all that is all dangerous
00:05:13.280 uh because yeah science is that in my opinion i'm still i'm a scientist i have to you know have to
00:05:20.080 to give i've trained in the sciences my doctorate in environmental science and i still believe science
00:05:25.360 is the best way of knowing uh how the world actually works and and empowers us to to make or the world
00:05:32.480 better make our better place when you bring up the trust in science i think that's a key point here
00:05:38.240 is that it's not even like in the long run what the government did really helped it because i i think
00:05:44.240 even very dutiful diligent otherwise obedient people that wanted to follow whatever justin
00:05:49.520 trudeau and theresa tam were telling them will start to get suspicious when there can be a complete
00:05:54.720 reversal like i mean the ones that we've all talked about here are you know you don't need masks
00:05:58.880 don't worry about the mask don't wear masks to everyone wear a mask from you know border closures are
00:06:04.080 racist to we have to close the border to uh you know the vaccine will prevent transmission to no
00:06:09.120 no no we never said it like if they had approached this with a bit more humility and said we are
00:06:14.320 learning as we go this is what we think now and then we changed it because this came up there would
00:06:19.920 probably be a little bit more forgiveness there but we didn't hear that and in fact the the efforts
00:06:24.640 that uh official institutions went to to block dissent and criticism which as you indicated
00:06:31.520 kenneth is part of the process uh just completely erodes that they were really interested in real
00:06:36.800 science yeah i think that's right i think i think uh there was actually a breach uh a breach in the
00:06:42.880 wall of trust of science as an institution uh and particularly the idea of of scientific medicine um
00:06:50.240 i don't think we'll ever recover or or the the public health agencies the the cdc the centers
00:06:55.600 disease control u.s um environment can the the health canadian health authorities i don't think
00:07:01.920 they'll recover their reputation because it's what you said which is at a certain point you know
00:07:06.080 there's a saying which is oh they said somebody posted something on the on on twitter uh twitter x
00:07:10.880 whatever you want to call it and as people say they said the quiet part out loud and they shouldn't
00:07:16.800 have done that and um which is they revealed their inner truth which is that the government is not using
00:07:22.560 science uh and this the the people on who were coming out saying that they were the the were the
00:07:29.040 champions of science uh also were stating things that would be would be shown to be as you said 180
00:07:35.120 degrees wrong within such a short period of time that it's undeniable to people that they you point out
00:07:44.320 the window right somebody says it's raining out you you point out the window it's not raining there's a
00:07:49.760 certain point where people can't deny that they're being misled and i think that's happened that i
00:07:54.720 think covid was was a case in that um it was of that sort where where the the complete turnaround was
00:08:01.920 so obvious and when they when they were when they finally resorted to saying the science is changing day
00:08:06.800 by day even people who have no background in the sciences have to understand or know that science
00:08:14.000 because you have to do experiments you have to publish them you have to right do the and and so forth
00:08:19.680 can't change day by day just one one quick question in closing here kenneth i mean in politics there's
00:08:28.960 a desire to move beyond this and really not to live in 2020 2021 2022 which i i'm sympathetic to in
00:08:36.720 science is there still a bit of lingering curiosity have you have your colleagues in various fields of
00:08:42.080 science thought that you know maybe we should go and look back empirically did this work did this work
00:08:48.160 or have they sort of tried to move on as well well i'm i'm not embedded at a university or in the
00:08:54.800 institution of science uh these days i'm not in which is why you're so reliable
00:09:00.000 but those of us on the on the outside tangential side who are are analysts or or students of what's
00:09:06.080 going on in science certainly uh think something needs to be done and and and there are there are more
00:09:11.440 and more um polls and and things coming out showing that people just don't trust uh the science to the
00:09:18.400 science anymore i find that troubling and and i've said the same thing as you have or something similar
00:09:24.160 to what you have which is until there is some process of reconciliation some process of admission
00:09:32.080 by the agencies not just while we should have communicated better uh which is i think the highest
00:09:37.280 they've gotten uh at the u.s health agencies uh while we need to communicate more and better um
00:09:43.280 until there is is actually some sort of a process in which they admit we were making stuff up we were
00:09:48.960 arbitrary and capricious we did immense damage to people's lives literally probably much more damage
00:09:55.920 than covet did uh we're fired we're fired we're we're leaving we're leaving this field because we we
00:10:03.680 can't bring anything positive until there is some process of reconciliation um and the mission of blame
00:10:10.320 um there won't be any healing uh and and but but that this goes back a long way this goes
00:10:17.920 to climate change as well which we talked about in the past which is until there's an admission that
00:10:23.360 that the the process that the interpretation of actual scientific information was corrupted
00:10:28.800 and here's why and here's how and here's how we're not going to do this again you won't get a
00:10:35.280 restoration of trust um yeah that's i think that's all there is to it very well said the uh essay in
00:10:43.120 the fraser institute is a covet 19 hygiene theater masks and lockdowns solid science in uh air quotes or
00:10:50.400 scare quotes or science veneer and that is by dr kenneth green always a pleasure thanks for coming back on
00:10:56.000 oh it's good to be with you thanks for listening to the andrew lawton show support the program by
00:11:00.640 donating to true north at www.tnc.news