ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- December 13, 2024
How low can Trudeau go?
Episode Stats
Length
35 minutes
Words per Minute
183.10005
Word Count
6,471
Sentence Count
8
Misogynist Sentences
4
Hate Speech Sentences
7
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
yeah see i thought i am very scottish and then i wondered how scottish i was and maybe it's english
00:00:05.120
and it turns out i'm like very distantly related to alfred the great and then a whole bunch of
00:00:09.520
people said oh billions of people are doing that so i don't know if it's even true so we'll have
00:00:14.400
to see is it really like that not to like discredit your heritage or anything but is it really that
00:00:21.440
like oppressive to be related to like a distant king or whatever like it's like a quarter of the
00:00:26.160
world's population related to genghis khan or something like that so that's why i've only
00:00:32.320
talked about it with my dear friends like you right now on the internet so and not spread it around
00:00:38.160
all joking aside going back into your ancestry is pretty crazy so uh that was pretty cool but
00:00:44.000
the thing i wanted to mention at the bottom of the show if we have time is the fact that now uh
00:00:48.400
canadian taxpayers own vacant land in senegal but i don't know if that makes us like an emperor or
00:00:53.920
something it's pretty good we own vacant land in senegal but no canadians can afford to own land
00:00:59.440
in canada uh wonderful well according to the liberals isn't that like neo-colonialism or
00:01:05.440
something like that i don't think like we're not i don't think we're supposed to do that according to
00:01:09.200
them i think we have a clip of trudeau okay since we're already getting into the show we should
00:01:12.640
probably start the show let's get this thing started
00:01:14.720
hi my name is chris simms i'm the alberta director for the canadian taxpayers federation
00:01:25.760
i'm sitting in here for true north on off the record with my dear friends isaac and noah uh
00:01:30.800
gentlemen we have a lot to get to and for our viewers and listeners uh a warning we have a lot
00:01:37.440
trudeau clips i actually hear from people who say i need a warning so this is your warning and they're
00:01:42.320
really good clips you have to listen to them uh gentlemen where do we want to start do we start
00:01:47.040
want to start with dei or do we want to start with him getting big mad about the carbon tax bumper
00:01:51.760
stickers i'll start with carbon tax yeah yeah all right so just to set this up uh prime minister
00:01:58.080
justin trudeau uh gave a speech at the halifax chamber of commerce out there on the east coast
00:02:03.840
um it was quick the speech i listened to all like 52 minutes of him from monday night and then he did
00:02:10.080
a sit down where he talked about a lot of stuff especially the carbon tax and he went over again
00:02:17.280
this canard that you can magically give the government money in the form of a carbon tax and
00:02:22.080
they will magically give you more back than you paid in at no cost to you which is not true and then he
00:02:27.280
seemed to get like really upset like ranty even about bumper stickers and the state of politics so
00:02:34.640
without further ado uh let's listen first to prime minister justin trudeau explaining in his view uh
00:02:42.800
the carbon tax to all of us we're not having real conversations around politics now we're having
00:02:49.680
you know seven second tick tock videos we're having a bumper sticker or a flag that's waving when i'm around
00:02:57.840
that's political discourse and debate of course it's easy to say tax is bad
00:03:11.040
sorry i don't know why i sounded like frankenstein when i was doing that but okay fire bad um but
00:03:18.640
having conversations about how we actually solve the challenges we're facing in this world
00:03:24.320
in thoughtful ways how we reduce our emissions and support hard-working families that's a more
00:03:33.360
complex answer than my opponents actually want you to have quite out there i will point out that the
00:03:42.080
tee-up question for this was something like so um your party really tanked in the provincial election
00:03:48.480
and it was largely because of the carbon tax and people really rejected it what do you think about that
00:03:53.280
and his answer was this big long-winded rant paraphrasing here but how people aren't smart
00:03:59.200
enough to grasp the genius of his carbon tax policy which is a really bad idea to tell voters uh
00:04:06.720
gentleman what did you guys think of this when he he did this sit down yeah i mean trudeau's response
00:04:13.200
we've seen from so many members of the liberal caucus which was not a response at all you ask them a
00:04:18.960
question and they just start talking about some random virtue signaling thing that might might not
00:04:23.440
even be related quite frankly and yeah i mean i don't know why the liberals keep repeating their
00:04:30.400
eight out of ten canadians are better due to the carbon tax lie that the pbo has repeatedly disproven
00:04:37.760
and as we talked about uh before the show chris i was mentioning uh let's say the cost is a few
00:04:42.880
hundred dollars per family in canada based on the pbo reports i mean we all know it's much higher
00:04:48.560
than that because these reports don't go into the trickle down effect of the production line because
00:04:53.520
when you tax gas or diesel and something you buy has 10 different lines of transportation that it's
00:05:00.880
taxed on of course you're going to pay more the fact that any canadian could believe they get more back
00:05:07.520
into the carbon tax is ridiculous and uh canadians obviously aren't buying the lie based on all the
00:05:13.760
polls and data we've seen yeah and to add on to your point isaac i mean the parliamentary budget
00:05:19.360
officers found that you know when accounting for the fiscal and economic impacts uh canadians lose
00:05:25.040
over a thousand dollars a year uh from the carbon tax that's probably higher because the parliamentary
00:05:29.520
budget officer generally you know makes these reports you know very modest modestly and very
00:05:34.880
cautiously and they're not exactly trying to account for every little thing uh that could be
00:05:40.320
causing uh households to have a net loss when it comes to the carbon tax and this is especially
00:05:46.400
affecting uh people in alberta because albertans are on average paying about two thousand three
00:05:52.800
hundred dollars uh net uh in net cost of the carbon tax and it's a lot higher than uh other parts
00:05:59.600
of the country it seems that if you know true about prime ministers with the last name trudeau
00:06:03.360
just have a knack for you know getting after albertans and you know making their lives a little
00:06:08.720
harder so um i think you know canadians the when when you tell them that um that it's raining
00:06:15.280
uh but you know yeah he really is just a guy you know how do you just you know pissing on you it's
00:06:21.120
people are gonna get sick out of it um like you can't continually gaslight canadians for nine years
00:06:28.400
and they feel the effects of your policies and then tell them you know be grateful for our you
00:06:33.600
know rebates you know while we are actually uh just like robbing you blind and you know causing a net
00:06:39.520
negative impact to the economy so careful on gaslighting because that's natural gas and there's
00:06:44.880
a carbon tax on natural gas so i'm not sure how much trudeau's came to gaslight us on with the carbon
00:06:50.240
tax on natural gas um as far as the numbers go here uh for alberta just to give you an idea like
00:06:56.560
for across the country the the mandatory minimum carbon tax the first carbon tax because we have
00:07:02.000
several on diesel is 21 cents per liter so if you do that math really and you fill up a big rig truck
00:07:10.320
for example that's about 200 extra just in the carbon tax not including administration cost not
00:07:16.880
including dst and the truckers finally came out and said so i think it's costing them two billion
00:07:22.160
dollars this year b that's just the first carbon tax um also keep in mind for home heating right now i
00:07:29.280
don't know about you guys but it's pretty frosty out here in lethbridge everything is coated in ice
00:07:34.080
and frost and most of us use natural gas for home heating here in alberta and the average average
00:07:40.800
alberta household will pay about 400 extra just this winter just in the carbon tax so it is a huge
00:07:48.880
expense for people and this is something i wanted to get into because the prime minister clearly does
00:07:55.440
not understand what it is to pay a bill i mean let's be honest here he's never had to worry about
00:08:00.720
his bill and in his entire life he was born wealthy he was raised largely at 24 sussex in a taxpayer funded
00:08:08.320
mansion and he has staff to do stuff for him now it's okay to be wealthy we want people to achieve and
00:08:14.800
work hard but what really gets frustrating for people is when he's the prime minister and he
00:08:20.000
keeps lecturing the rest of us about how important his carbon tax is and how we should be prioritizing
00:08:26.640
that over feeding our kids and paying rent and he said that again during this chit chat he also said
00:08:34.320
it for the first time on stage a couple of weeks ago in brazil which was just bonkers it went crazy on
00:08:39.760
mine but i wanted to pull up one of his other greatest hits that he dug up during this chat and
00:08:45.360
that's where he says something to the effect of he said this a few weeks ago you know what isaac and
00:08:51.120
noah the only people who are truly feeling the cost of the carbon tax are people with mansions with
00:08:56.560
indoor swimming pools and a bunch of personal cars he doubled down on that but get this now it's up to
00:09:04.320
three mansions listen to this if everyone gets here in nova scotia about 824 a year from the canada
00:09:11.680
carbon rebate that's the average price now if you have three big mansions with an indoor swimming pool
00:09:19.040
that 824 a year isn't going to cover that price on pollution you're choosing to pollute more than
00:09:25.120
we're giving you back for but if you're a middle class family and if you're living in rural areas we give
00:09:30.800
a 20 top up because we know you have to drive further to go to school to drop your school or work
00:09:36.000
we're giving you that money back
00:09:40.160
so again he keeps pushing this and to your point noah uh with the latest parliamentary budget
00:09:46.560
officer report because of course they've gone back and forth and they fought over what the real
00:09:49.840
numbers are even in the most conservative possible read of it when you go take a look at the overall
00:09:56.880
impact of the carbon tax the average alberta family even on paper is still out 400 this year
00:10:04.800
and it's only going to go up as they continue to increase the carbon tax so even his own data
00:10:10.240
defies this which is of course you know a violation of common sense um i i don't know about you guys uh but
00:10:16.320
i did not grow up with an indoor swimming pool and no judgment did either of you guys grow up with an
00:10:21.200
indoor swimming heated swimming pool i don't know my roof has a hole in it so yeah take your guesses
00:10:28.720
so no my roof has a hole in it too so of this my roof is intact thank goodness but of the people on
00:10:35.680
this call and in this chat um we've played a clip from a guy twice who grew up with an indoor swimming
00:10:42.240
pool at 24 sussex just saying in fact it was installed when his dad was prime minister so we know for
00:10:50.640
faxies that he grew up at least partially with an indoor heated swimming pool so speaking of not
00:10:57.600
getting it um i didn't watch this clip because it wasn't in pertaining to like balance budgets or
00:11:03.040
carbon tax or something but apparently he said something along the lines of he was really sad that
00:11:08.560
kamala harris didn't win the presidency who wants to take this one away
00:11:12.320
uh well i can uh so basically uh basically uh justin trudeau he has been trying to i guess uh
00:11:24.160
ease tensions uh between canada and the united states uh specifically because donald trump
00:11:29.120
recently said that he would be imposing a 25 tariff on canada and mexico as so long as they
00:11:35.360
as we uh do not meet certain conditions ever pertaining to border security and drug smuggling
00:11:41.760
so you know while we're in this the middle of this you know tense negotiation trudeau gets up on stage
00:11:47.600
in all of his hubris and progressive aura and basically says that you know i kind of wish that
00:11:54.240
kamala harris won the election and you know her losing the election is uh quote uh women's progress
00:12:00.800
under attack um i think we have a clip for this so we should uh hear it from the donkey's mouth
00:12:07.520
himself now it shouldn't be that way it wasn't supposed to be that way we were supposed to be on
00:12:14.080
a steady if difficult sometimes march towards progress and yet just a few weeks ago the united states
00:12:23.360
voted for a second time to not elect its first woman president everywhere women's rights
00:12:31.280
and women's progress is under attack overtly and subtly but i want you to know that i am
00:12:38.000
and always will be a proud feminist you will always have an ally in me and in my government
00:12:46.800
i i mean absolutely ridiculous especially considering what he did to jody wilson raybald and
00:12:52.800
jane philpot but uh like i just i just i don't want to go on too much of a tangent but when he talks
00:12:59.200
about the sort of march of progress or whatever he says uh that's a very sort of like left-wing view
00:13:05.920
of the world that you know we have to get rid of old traditional mores and we have to get rid of the
00:13:11.680
the values that canada was founded on and our civilization was founded on and instead replace
00:13:17.200
it with these new progressive uh values and we've basically been dealing with that for the past nine
00:13:22.400
years and look at what it's gotten us you know we basically got rid of the old values of you know
00:13:28.000
moderate immigration and you know he wrapped it up and look at what look what's happened you know he's
00:13:32.080
got rid of uh rid of the idea that we're supposed to be canadians first and foremost and have pride and
00:13:37.920
love for our country and instead you know went toward this post-national view of the country and look
00:13:42.720
what's happening in our streets when we have uh people marching uh for foreign terrorist groups
00:13:48.880
in montreal and in toronto it's absolutely uh ridiculous this is the sort of world view that
00:13:54.880
justin trudeau um that justin trudeau's world view gets us to so uh what did you guys uh make of justin
00:14:01.360
trudeau saying that kamla harrison's defeat is uh you know an attack on women and their progress and their
00:14:07.760
rights yeah so my first takeaway from what trudeau said there is he is essentially saying dei should
00:14:17.040
supersede democracy this from the leader of canada the prime minister of canada a democratic democratic
00:14:23.920
nation i mean the fact that anyone could possibly agree with those words being uttered by our leader
00:14:31.520
is is is shocking i mean in what world should world leaders be chosen on dei uh attributes not
00:14:40.720
because they're brilliant economically savvy uh smart i mean the list goes on of adjectives you could use
00:14:45.920
by the way none of which i believe kamala harris was so there's the good example and we saw we saw how
00:14:51.920
decisive of an election it was in the united states they clearly voted against dei initiatives so trudeau's
00:14:58.480
kind of on the other side of the coin and and i mean i think in the near future here we're going to see
00:15:04.720
at least the western world completely shun dei so uh trudeau can continue down this path but i don't
00:15:11.520
know that that will get him much support so as a woman uh i find it really insulting and demeaning for
00:15:20.640
him to try to speak for me uh i think that's gross uh as someone who values lower taxes and balanced
00:15:27.680
budgets um has he met premier danielle smith she's the premier of alberta and as of right now and it
00:15:37.200
better stay that way keeping an eye on you uh the budget is balanced here in alberta uh we are saving
00:15:43.760
money in the heritage fund uh we have a taxpayer protection act that they have beefed up so that
00:15:49.440
if they wanted to increase any personal taxes uh that are already existing we'd have to have a referendum
00:15:54.880
to do it like there are a lot of awesome things here happening fiscally in alberta and the premier
00:16:03.600
happens to be a woman so this should be based on numbers and results and merit and performance
00:16:11.680
uh he might have cracked open a history book uh i think his father probably met the late margaret
00:16:17.360
factor she was just prime minister of you know the united kingdom for more than a decade so it's it's
00:16:24.400
weird to have just saying as a woman who's been in the political arena now for like 25 years
00:16:30.240
it's weird to have the prime ministers making this about men and women rather than number one that's
00:16:36.400
another country and they had a democratic election and that's their choice two you got to go into
00:16:42.800
negotiations with this dude now that you just finished saying out loud with your face wish
00:16:48.000
hadn't won that's not going to go super awesome for you and three it's weird to have him overlooking
00:16:56.160
really competent political leaders who happen to be women here in canada for the purpose of his own
00:17:01.920
narrative so that can get that can get squishy there um did we want to go to gst who wants to take the fun
00:17:08.800
with the gst right the gst poll yeah the gst poll so for folks who don't remember um we've got a
00:17:17.360
temporary reprieve of gst on some items you find in the grocery store and other stuff like you know
00:17:22.960
kids clothes and diapers which frankly shouldn't have gst anyway and it's going to last for a couple
00:17:26.960
of months and then there's also a february if i'm correct everybody's supposed to get who's working
00:17:33.040
supposed to get about 250 bucks each so but there's a poll now out on it
00:17:37.120
yeah and this poll went into both the gst hst holiday and the 250 check highlighting that
00:17:44.880
essentially canadians are not buying what the liberals are selling so yeah this was a survey
00:17:51.200
from the um angus reed institute uh and it asked canadians about as i mentioned both the 250 one-time
00:17:57.920
check and the gst hst cuts which by the way both policies will cost more than 6.2 billion dollars
00:18:05.760
this with what what's our debt at now chris 1.25 trillion just over that yep yeah uh so
00:18:13.840
the interesting thing about this poll was it really went into the data and it showed that
00:18:18.720
over a quarter of the poll respondents said they weren't even eligible for the check
00:18:23.280
uh even more almost 40 said it would have absolutely no impact on their household while only just over 30
00:18:30.240
said it would help a little but get this only five percent of canadians said it would help a lot
00:18:35.440
so that's not really doing anything for them and then going into the gst hst exemptions this over
00:18:42.080
half 55 said that it'll do nothing to help their household and then over a third 38 said it would
00:18:49.280
help a little but again only seven percent said it would help a lot uh and yeah the poll got into all
00:18:55.440
the income groups and age groups and of course the parties as well which as you would uh expect
00:19:02.640
the conservatives were the most likely to say that this that these policies were quote entirely
00:19:07.200
political with 82 of those who intend to vote conservatives saying that uh compared to when
00:19:14.640
you look at all parties it was 55 overall who said that it was entirely political
00:19:18.800
hmm that is rough actually yeah i mean there's so much data i could go into it all but basically all
00:19:25.840
you guys need to know is that canadians aren't buying either of the policies uh yeah what do you
00:19:30.640
think about that go ahead noah well yeah i think that it's entirely political and canadians know that
00:19:39.120
and they that they don't want to feel bought off i mean this is the type of stuff that happens in
00:19:44.000
10 part you know democracy even like latin america or like africa or somewhere you know
00:19:49.040
before an election they're just handing out you know a couple hundred bucks to people like okay now
00:19:53.360
go vote for us you know that's exactly what trudeau wants to do especially since there was speculation
00:19:59.120
that the liberals might want to try and call for a spring election or at least maneuver i think the
00:20:04.160
parliament so that an election does occur uh in the spring right just uh before after the um checks get
00:20:11.200
mailed out to canadians so uh and you see this in other promises too like english colombia and
00:20:17.040
in ontario and come back this part of the reason but but the thing is this stuff does not work in
00:20:23.360
quebec francois legault i think mailed out 500 checks to people i think during the pandemic and
00:20:27.840
just after the pandemic and his approval rating is at the lowest it's ever been i think his personal
00:20:33.360
approval ratings at like 26 his parties at like 21 in the polls uh doug ford is immune to all
00:20:41.200
political hits and you know so ontario is just weird like that uh in bc you've seen a big backlash
00:20:48.160
against the eb government with the bc conservatives coming within a an inch of forming government
00:20:53.520
and trudeau is you know sticking to these terrible tactics terrible policies trying to buy canadians off
00:21:00.240
people don't want to feel like it feels grimy you know like you know getting paid off to you know
00:21:05.680
vote for a politician like people don't want to feel like that so they're it's actually going to
00:21:10.720
probably cause a backlash and cause more people to move away from the lower party which i think is
00:21:15.520
absolutely hilarious yeah speaking of that noah let me just get into that data quickly which i
00:21:20.560
forgot to mention this is very very key is that it actually is causing a backlash so get this less
00:21:26.960
than two percent of the respondents this excluding those that already intend to vote liberal said that
00:21:31.920
these policies would make it quote much more likely that they would vote for the liberals in
00:21:35.920
the future elections whereas three percent said they would make it quote more likely 55 said it would
00:21:42.560
make no difference but get this this is where it gets interesting so eight percent of respondents
00:21:47.280
said that these policies would make it quote less likely for them to vote liberals in the future
00:21:51.760
whereas 28 28 said that it would make it quote much less likely that they would vote liberals in the future
00:21:59.040
due to these policies so what what do you i mean this is this is these are insane numbers what do
00:22:04.160
you think about the backlash we're seeing from from these policies i mean clearly they are panning out
00:22:09.360
terribly yeah people don't want to be bought off and you know like 250 dollars it's marginal
00:22:16.160
you know the carbon tax it's it's it's rinsing canes for thousands of dollars uh every year instead
00:22:21.200
of you know mailing out these checks if you're like oh here you go after we've robbed you blind i'm
00:22:25.760
gonna give you so it's like that meme where the guy hands out a ten dollar bill from like a wallet
00:22:31.040
where he has a hundred bucks and the guy just takes the wall instead of the ten dollar bill so you're
00:22:34.560
left with you know a little instead of giving the guy what you actually wanted like this is like that
00:22:38.960
meme in real life you know they're gonna rinse you blot uh rinse you with thousands for a thousand
00:22:43.680
dollars with the carbon tax they're gonna rinse you with increases in in the in taxes elsewhere
00:22:48.720
and the capital gains tax the economic activity is gonna go down wage and wage growth is gonna be
00:22:54.000
stunted like oh here's 250 bucks like people know that this is absolutely ridiculous and it's gonna
00:22:58.960
hurt the true uh true liberals politically as it should to me it's a big indicator that 28 that's a
00:23:07.360
big number um to me this just indicates people are angry like really angry and no matter what this
00:23:16.000
government does sounds like it's just gonna keep on getting angrier um it's one of those situations
00:23:22.400
where it's almost like an interpersonal fight where our line has been crossed and you're completely
00:23:28.160
done with that person it's like no no no no matter what you say it is going to make me matter so they
00:23:33.440
come back with some roses you know it doesn't really like no exactly you know take your chocolates and
00:23:38.880
i'll chuck them over the fence right so it seems like we're getting to that boiling point now and again
00:23:44.640
to be fair um this happens in government uh people were super mad at the brian mulroney government and
00:23:51.680
that is why the pcs were reduced to two seats so to me um that was a conservative government kind of
00:23:58.800
and to me this is feeling like that again where people are just completely done and they're at the
00:24:05.520
moment of let's vote the bums out um i will also point out that even the so-called sausage making isn't
00:24:12.480
working very well right now uh in ottawa so quite often it's important to kind of pull back the
00:24:18.240
curtain like in the wizard of oz and see what's going on behind the curtain and apparently for
00:24:24.160
example the uh the premier of new brunswick who's a newly elected liberal party premier of new brunswick
00:24:31.760
was barely consulted about this temporary gst pause so much so that especially in atlantic canada they
00:24:39.520
have an hst so meaning their provincial sales tax which we do not have here in alberta thank you very
00:24:45.360
much um their provincial sales tax is enmeshed with the federal one and apparently she had like
00:24:52.640
a 36 hour heads up and oh by the way this is going to blow this big of a hole in your provincial budget
00:24:58.800
in the revenue column now again i'm all for a tax cut that's a really good thing i'm talking about the
00:25:04.160
fact that there was nearly no consultation even with your closest players and a birdie was telling
00:25:10.400
me because i still have a lot of friends in ottawa bless them um that apparently even the bureaucrats
00:25:16.160
so those in the department the unelected part of the final financial department they still have some
00:25:21.520
adults working in there believe it or not we're tearing their hair out at this saying what you're
00:25:26.320
doing what you haven't talked to whom like so this was a seat of your pants quick grasp to try to fix
00:25:33.520
stuff and again if you're giving me 250 bucks back of my own money i'm going to take it because that
00:25:38.800
goes a ways towards your energy bill it can buy a few groceries that is a good thing but the fact that
00:25:44.480
they could even screw up a tax cut it's ridiculous like like like even good ideas and i don't think
00:25:52.160
it's a good idea but even like good ideas implemented poorly it's just going to be bad policy that's not
00:25:58.000
going to help anyone you know i i but this is like a policy that was written on the back of a napkin
00:26:03.520
and then handed over to christopher freeland's like implement this now you know like i sort of imagine
00:26:08.480
like there was a cabinet immediately meeting you know trudeau's hearing from the cabinet ministers
00:26:12.880
didn't like what you want to or what they were saying so you know brings melanie jolene to the
00:26:17.120
back room yeah they each have a scotch with one another and then they can see with this uh plan you
00:26:22.080
know uh like and then they're like okay guys this is what we're doing and freeland's like what all the
00:26:27.520
bureaucrats are like you can't do this and like no we're doing it so you know like it's just a bad
00:26:32.480
idea you know tax relief it's great do it properly though and they're absolutely not doing that and you
00:26:39.520
know they obviously didn't give the bureaucrats enough time to be able to implement this properly
00:26:43.920
which is bad governance it's the opposite of good government reminds me of lining up to take a quick
00:26:49.120
sprint like a good race and just forgetting to tie up your shoes and you just rip and fall on your
00:26:54.160
teeth so this is kind of what this is happening uh do we want to get on to our last story here the fun
00:27:00.080
one about global affairs spending millions of dollars to own stuff around the world who wanted
00:27:05.600
to take that one away i i i thought i could if you wanted to i did but uh this was based of course on
00:27:15.120
the ctfs write-up which you you had done chris so but if you want me to do it sure if that's fine
00:27:20.160
uh so you did a really good write-up on it so i think you should get the cred so thank you thank
00:27:25.040
you chris yeah of course the ctf through some access to information documents revealed that
00:27:30.560
taxpayers were funding the tab for a federal department's real estate portfolio which was
00:27:35.360
costing 186 million dollars over the last decade this was from global affairs canada who owns more than
00:27:42.720
400 properties in over 70 countries and no people these aren't uh standard properties for example
00:27:50.800
one of the expenses 12.5 million dollars for vacant land in senegal i mean what are we talking about
00:27:57.920
who pays 12.5 million dollars for vacant land except maybe in vancouver
00:28:04.720
maybe we're gonna build another disneyland there i hope not all the people in vancouver right now is
00:28:10.080
like this goddamn isaac you know he's making fun of our profits that's true my favorite part of that
00:28:16.960
and i say favorite because folks who are watching this that are like really struggling i know we have
00:28:21.520
to stay happy warriors if we don't laugh we will cry about this also it's really important to laugh
00:28:27.520
at this government because they hate it like they take themselves super seriously like they think they're
00:28:32.400
landed dukes the prime minister of canada is paid more than four hundred thousand dollars per year
00:28:37.600
taxpayer funded and lives in a mansion with staff so it's important for us as jesters to poke and laugh
00:28:43.440
at the king super important so my favorite part of this was the fact that taxpayers are on the tip
00:28:49.120
tab for 41 million dollars for properties that we own in afghanistan now before you get started
00:28:56.800
on the whole operation medusa and all that stuff no no no folks they bought this in late 2018 2019
00:29:04.320
well into the early indications that uh we'll be leaving soon guys so i think this happened after
00:29:11.840
then u.s president donald trump was having meetings with the taliban saying yeah knock it off and we're
00:29:17.120
leaving so pretty much everybody in the western world as far as i could tell by then knew we were
00:29:22.160
leaving but nope here comes canada foreign affairs canada we're going to spend 41 million dollars on
00:29:27.280
property and by the way that's now obviously being totally controlled by the taliban we can't we have no
00:29:32.160
way of even checking on it but boneheaded the decision to buy this i mean like you couldn't rent
00:29:38.160
it uh like you know why do you have to own the piece of land and like furthermore i've got you like
00:29:44.720
you guys invaded afghanistan just take it you don't have to buy the land you know like like i don't take
00:29:50.880
it it's right there you know you're like whatever what are we doing here like it's absolutely ridiculous
00:29:57.040
that yeah global affairs like it's just wasting taxpayers money like like uh like have unlimited
00:30:02.640
amounts of cash like 10.2 million dollars on a chancery in ukraine i don't even know what a
00:30:08.400
chancery is i have to look that up um you know like vacant land in senegal i mean come on guys we
00:30:15.280
we can do a little bit better have some more care for the taxpayer and the value of their dollar
00:30:20.960
a chancery is kind of a super special embassy with an official residence correct
00:30:27.200
like why do we need that though like like settle it like like the ukrainians need like shelter for
00:30:32.960
the bombs that's dropping you know like let them let them have it don't i don't know it seems
00:30:38.240
ridiculous to me it's also an awful lot of money again on the new york uh embassy as well with the
00:30:43.520
official residence there the point of this is is that quite often when we'll yell about the fact that
00:30:49.360
the budget is horribly imbalanced as of right now technically on paper the deficit is about 40 billion
00:30:56.000
dollars in the red to give you an idea of what kind of money that is that would build you 38 brand
00:31:02.480
new really awesome hospitals that's just the deficit and we don't have the fall economic statement yet
00:31:08.800
but apparently all the rumors are is that it's going to be even a bigger deficit so whenever we
00:31:13.760
yell at them and say could you clowns try to balance the budget they say something like oh what
00:31:20.160
do you want to cut first food to orphans or health care for grandma um no how about you not spend 41
00:31:27.200
million dollars on property in afghanistan that is now being controlled by the taliban just to start
00:31:33.840
chris just wanted to get your thoughts on something because i see your defund the cbc
00:31:37.360
sticker in the back there and obviously the canadian taxpayers federation previously highlighted that
00:31:41.680
the cbc's real estate portfolio was worth over 444 million dollars across 12 properties i mean
00:31:48.640
what yep these properties are over 30 million dollars each what are they buying so the two
00:31:55.440
big ones again i don't care i'm going to pick on vancouver all i want because i was raised just
00:31:59.520
outside of vancouver it used to be a really fun place to work and live it is not fun anymore because
00:32:03.920
it's outrageously expensive they own a ginormous piece of property right on the waterfront in vancouver
00:32:10.640
is where the cbc headquarters is is there in in bc so it's right downtown um i actually think it was
00:32:17.360
right around the corner frighteningly enough from like a shooting that happened there just like a
00:32:22.160
few days ago so that was pretty freaky so that's now bleeding into like downtown fancy vancouver so
00:32:27.760
they own a big property there in downtown fancy vancouver right near the water and also the big one of
00:32:33.440
course is in toronto that gigantic building that they have there like that the building is so big
00:32:42.000
um that when you walk in they used to have like three story tall pictures of gian gomeshi
00:32:48.640
who used to be of course the host of q um that like in superhuman size and they even had two i don't
00:32:55.360
know if they still have them they had these little droids that used to develop deliver your mail so your
00:33:01.360
inter-office like mail if you're mailing something from you know one floor to another floor they had
00:33:06.560
bots that did that before bots were even a thing like this thing is huge so yeah this is what you're
00:33:12.320
paying for with the cbc that's why we took them to the cleaners there at the committee the heritage
00:33:18.480
committee and said you guys are costing us this year 1.4 billion dollars you're getting microscopic
00:33:25.120
ratings and it's wrong for journalists to be paid by the government and we just think those are
00:33:30.320
inassailable but you're right a big chunk of that cost is the holdings of real estate that the
00:33:36.080
state broadcaster is hanging on to thank you for reminding me i'm mad all again now
00:33:42.080
all right folks that was really fun uh any other uh parting shots that you would like to take
00:33:49.120
well i just gotta say that if you are a global affairs canada bureaucrat uh like don't spend like
00:33:56.640
you like you have elon musk's wallet you know like you don't it's not a limited amount of money
00:34:02.240
you can't you know spend billion dollars more on stuff but just because you want to buy it like
00:34:07.200
you know must have for twitter just like spend like you know you're a college student trying to
00:34:13.200
make ends meet and the taxpayers will thank you for it but right now you're gonna have the canadian
00:34:18.320
taxpayers federation on your back because you guys are doing a good job thank you well i wish musk
00:34:24.800
would come up here when he's finished cleaning it up in the states because we definitely need our own
00:34:28.720
department of government efficiency but until then remember everything is off the record
00:34:41.040
speaking of musk we never did get into him so i'll just reference that quickly because for those
00:34:45.120
who don't know he mentioned trudeau on twitter and musk said quote he's such an insufferable tool we
00:34:52.320
won't be in power for much longer so yeah oh there it is perfect isn't musk a canadian citizen i think
00:34:58.480
he has like eight citizenships but i think he's partly canadian i would like him to come up here
00:35:03.440
uh if for nothing else to uh try to cut some government spending so thank you for that
Link copied!