Is Ottawa to blame for Canada’s failing health care system?
Episode Stats
Words per minute
186.27477
Harmful content
Misogyny
2
sentences flagged
Hate speech
1
sentences flagged
Summary
In this episode, we discuss the Supreme Court's recent ruling in the case of Bill C-14 regarding access to medical care in Canada, and why we should demand better healthcare choices from the federal government. We are joined by Colin Craig, President of 2ndstreet.org, to discuss the issue.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Let's talk about another issue where certainly the legal issues have not been solved by the
00:00:15.720
court. So we perhaps have to look for political solutions. And healthcare is a tremendous example
00:00:21.020
of that. Healthcare choice. It's not really something we have universally available to
00:00:25.400
Canadians. If you are in Quebec, you have that option because the Supreme Court has decided you
00:00:30.720
do, but only in Quebec, not if you live in another province, certainly not in British Columbia. We view
00:00:37.020
healthcare rightfully so as a provincial issue, but there was a piece from Colin Craig, who's the
00:00:42.100
president of secondstreet.org that says we need to put some of the blame on federal gatekeepers as
00:00:48.140
well. He says we should demand healthcare choice from federal political leaders. Colin Craig joins
00:00:54.320
me now. Always good to talk to you, Colin. So yeah, let's just explain the basics here. Why is this
00:00:59.800
an issue that is federal? Well, it's a reality that the federal government gives provincial governments
00:01:06.940
billions of dollars every single year for healthcare. It is a minority position. So when you
00:01:13.960
go to a hospital and you get care or you visit your family doctor, the bulk of the bill is paid for by
00:01:21.100
the provincial government using tax dollars. But they still receive a decent portion. I don't know
00:01:27.120
the exact percentage offhand, but they still receive a decent enough portion that they certainly want
00:01:33.220
to keep Ottawa happy because they don't want to lose those dollars. And so sometimes when provincial
00:01:38.480
governments go to do things that Ottawa doesn't like, they threaten or they actually come in with
00:01:42.760
funding cuts in terms of how much they're giving for healthcare. So that's how Ottawa is tied into
00:01:47.260
this. And it's done through the Canada Health Act, which is basically a funding mechanism
00:01:52.500
in terms of how Ottawa agrees to give provincial governments money for healthcare.
00:01:57.820
So one of the things that I find just so baffling here, and again, we just had Marty Moore on to do
00:02:02.800
the legal stuff. So you and I don't have to go down the legal road, but the Supreme Court has said,
00:02:07.460
yeah, access to a wait list is not access to healthcare. They've said that you should have the
00:02:11.720
right if you have the means available to go and do something else. They've just said this is the case
00:02:15.360
only in one province alone. You know, it would arguably be more of an easy pill to swallow
00:02:21.560
if they had said no across the board. But in this case, someone in British Columbia can't go to the
00:02:26.800
Camby Clinic, but someone in Quebec can go wherever they want to go.
00:02:30.500
Yeah. And just make a distinction for your listeners, because this can get a bit confusing
00:02:35.520
sometimes. And what people don't always pick up on is that it's getting private or non-government
00:02:41.420
care locally. This is the sticking point. As a Calgarian, if I need a hip operation,
00:02:47.700
I cannot pay in Calgary or anywhere else in Alberta. I can fly to British Columbia and pay
00:02:54.500
to get one there. I can fly to certainly Quebec and other provinces. So you actually have the same
00:03:00.480
problem in BC. Someone in Vancouver cannot pay at a private clinic in Vancouver. They can in Calgary.
00:03:08.500
So you see this happening where people... And it's the same doctors that could have just served
00:03:13.340
the person in their own province if legal. Yeah, it's crazy. No other country on the planet does
00:03:20.380
what Canada does in this regard. It makes no sense in terms of cost. You're increasing cost for
00:03:25.920
patients. You're inconveniencing them at a time that usually this is the last thing they need if
00:03:30.720
you've got chronic pain because they're waiting for hip operation. Like last thing you want to do is
00:03:35.540
jump on an airplane and go somewhere else to get it done. So it makes no sense at all. You know,
00:03:41.180
if you're the federal government, I would point out it's bad for the environment, right? To force
00:03:45.940
people to have to travel even further to get the care that you need. But I certainly wouldn't
00:03:50.260
criticize any patient for doing what they can to improve the health of their bodies.
00:03:56.700
When you talk about this in level-headed terms, you know, I think, wow, you know, this is easy.
00:04:01.360
Why isn't every Canadian getting on board with this? But you bring it into the public realm.
00:04:05.200
Certainly, if a politician were to ever say what you're saying, and as just passionate and mild
00:04:09.160
mannered a way, they're going to have the activists jumping saying they're privatizing healthcare,
0.91
00:04:13.440
American healthcare, you're going to be no longer served. If you're, if you don't have money,
00:04:18.080
people are going to go broke. Like you have all of these doom and gloom scenarios,
00:04:20.960
which how do you push back against that? I mean, how do you tell people that actually,
00:04:25.680
no, it increases care for everyone. Yeah. So, I mean, that's really the debate
00:04:31.980
that dominated 20, 30 years ago. And this is why we didn't see any changes back then. The public has
00:04:38.420
shifted and credit to groups that were around before us. And certainly we've been talking about
00:04:43.940
it for several years now. But reality is, there's not two systems on the planet. It's not just Canada
00:04:49.700
or the US. There are lots of countries that have universal systems like Canada, Norway, Sweden,
00:04:57.420
France, you know, throughout the European Union, Australia, New Zealand. And, you know, many,
00:05:03.540
many reports show that they're doing better than Canada. And the key difference is that they give
00:05:08.000
patients the choice between using their public systems, or using non-government options, whether
00:05:14.360
it's a nonprofit clinic, a private clinic, whatever, patients have that choice. We don't typically
00:05:19.440
have that choice, as we've just discussed in Canada. So, I think more and more Canadians
00:05:24.020
understand that. They're on board with it. The polls show that a large majority of Canadians
00:05:29.700
understand that throwing money at the system is not the solution. We spend a lot of money on healthcare
00:05:35.200
in this country. That's not the problem. The problem is that we don't get good results because
00:05:40.160
of the structure of the system. And giving patients choice, it helps take pressure off of the public
00:05:46.600
system. You know, my bet is if we did that across the country, made it easier, the vast majority of
00:05:52.740
people would still use the public system, and that's fine. But you'd probably have maybe around 10-15%
00:05:58.260
that would use non-government options. I mean, that's kind of been the Swedish experience. And who
00:06:05.400
wouldn't want to take 10 or 15% of pressure off of our healthcare system right now? It'd be, you know,
00:06:11.720
a significant benefit. And combined with other reforms, we could ultimately deliver better care
00:06:17.820
for patients. But the response you get to that is, what happens if 10% or 15% of the doctors
00:06:23.780
decide to leave the public system and go to the private system? Then you've not really helped
00:06:27.920
anything. And what's the answer to that? Yeah, I'm glad you raised that because a lot of people
00:06:31.720
raise that point. And what I always respond with is, well, how does Sweden do it? How does Norway do
00:06:37.660
it? How does Australia do it? I mean, all these other countries that perform better than Canada,
00:06:42.360
they have found a way to do it. And often the solution is that they will cap in the United
00:06:47.600
Kingdom, for example, they cap how much time some in the public system can work in the private system.
00:06:53.260
The second thing to keep in mind is that when you have more employers, you end up with more
00:06:58.940
employees. This is something that the Swedes told us when we were in their country last year talking
00:07:04.280
with people about healthcare. And I thought this is a great way of explaining it. Because when you
00:07:08.940
have a more vibrant healthcare sector, you have more choices for people in the healthcare sector in
00:07:14.800
terms of where they want to work. Right now in Canada, you often have doctors and nurses graduating
00:07:20.740
and they look around and often the option is, well, I work in the government system or I go somewhere
00:07:26.900
else. Well, if they had more choices in Canada, then we could retain more doctors, we could retain
00:07:32.040
more nurses, we wouldn't have the shortages that we have right now. And I know it's not perfectly
00:07:37.400
analogous, but I would also say that we could look at the education system. It's another regulated
00:07:41.920
professional designation to be a teacher. We have private schools. We have not seen this mass exodus of
00:07:48.360
public school teachers to private schools because we also forget that people are motivated by different
00:07:52.720
things. People that go into healthcare are motivated by different things. You may really want to be
00:07:56.620
in a hospital and a family medicine practice and you'll stay in the system because it offers you
00:08:01.060
something. Yeah, I mean, I love that example. We've used it too, Andrew, because it's such a good
00:08:05.880
comparison. You, across Canada, we have choices for parents. You can put your kids in the government run
00:08:12.980
system or you can pay for, you know, private school, independent school, whatever. And the vast majority of
00:08:19.500
Canadians still choose the public system and that's totally fine. But when those do decide, some
00:08:23.920
parents decide on private options, again, they're taking pressure off of those, those public school
00:08:29.000
systems. The point about, you know, choice for, for workers is important. Here's a crazy number that
00:08:36.260
we were able to calculate using some data from the state of Michigan is that there's nearly 2000 nurses
00:08:43.140
who live in Ontario and get up each day for work and they cross the border into Michigan
00:08:49.380
primarily working in the Detroit area. Like that is huge. And we talked to them, we surveyed them.
00:08:56.520
We said, well, why are you doing this? And the number one reason it actually wasn't compensation.
00:09:01.000
It was the availability of work. They had the types of work, like positions that they wanted.
00:09:08.120
But the second reason was compensation and right behind it was working conditions. And many of them
00:09:14.600
noted that they could get these jobs in Michigan. They were the way that they wanted them. They had,
00:09:21.740
they were full time, came with benefits. They came with a predictable schedule. I mean, you,
00:09:28.800
you had a competitive environment in Michigan where they were having employer, employers competing to
00:09:35.300
attract these workers and finding ways to give them the type of work arrangements that they wanted.
0.80
00:09:41.160
Whereas in Ontario, they were looking at it and they're looking at the government system and saying,
00:09:45.560
no, I just don't want to work there. And this has been a problem for a long time. You can't blame
00:09:50.040
the current government. You can't blame even, I don't think the former government, because it's just,
00:09:54.340
it's the problem when you have this monopolistic environment.
00:09:58.240
To be honest, I wonder why, I should, I understand why, but if you really think about it, it's quite
00:10:06.760
surprising provinces haven't seen the opportunity in this, because if you're a provincial government
00:10:11.600
and you can come up with a pitch that you can make to voters, which is you will not pay more in taxes,
00:10:17.420
you will not have any reduction in your care, but you will have this added option. And at the very least,
00:10:23.740
even if you can't afford to use it, there will be fewer people on the wait list ahead of you in the public
00:10:27.480
system to get it because, you know, two or three of those folks will go to the system. You've actually
00:10:32.080
eased the healthcare crisis without having to spend a dollar. And I really don't know why
00:10:39.100
provincial governments have not been the ones to take the lead and call for that.
00:10:43.260
They're, they're concerned about funding cutbacks from Ottawa.
00:10:46.940
But to bring the fight to Ottawa, let us do it. I mean, we see provinces on drug decriminalization
00:10:51.740
saying, not as much anymore, but, you know, saying, hey, give us the right to do this.
00:10:57.740
They could do the same thing provincially if they wanted to expend the political capital doing so.
00:11:02.520
They could. I think it would be wise for patients for them to do this. And the easiest,
00:11:08.520
I think, argument they can make going into Ottawa is, look, Ottawa, you're allowing Quebec to do this.
00:11:14.600
Quebecers get more healthcare rights than anyone else in the country. We need to even the playing
00:11:19.460
field and give all Canadians the same rights that Quebecers have. I think that's the argument that
00:11:24.120
needs to be made if you're in BC, Alberta, wherever. I mean, the BC government obviously isn't going
00:11:29.100
to make that argument, but certainly others could in Ontario, you know, Doug Ford could stand up and
00:11:35.120
make that argument. We don't really look at this through a partisan lens, but the bottom line is
00:11:40.680
it would help patients. And it makes sense for elected officials to do it. The public is behind
00:11:47.640
them. This is like I say, this isn't the debate from 20 years ago. The public has heard, they've seen
00:11:52.240
governments do the same tired old approach of throwing money at the system, hoping something's
00:11:56.980
going to work. It hasn't worked. It's failed. It's time to start looking at what these countries
00:12:02.500
that perform better than Canada, what they do. And then we can start copying them and bring our
0.55
00:12:08.200
standards up. And this is one thing among several changes that could be made to improve results for
00:12:14.900
Colin, Craig, always good to talk to you from secondstreet.org. Thanks so much for coming on
00:12:21.960
Thanks for listening to The Andrew Lawton Show. Support the program by donating to True North