Juno News - November 27, 2021


Is self-government the answer to the Canada-Indigenous relationship?


Episode Stats


Length

39 minutes

Words per minute

189.28444

Word count

7,412

Sentence count

390

Harmful content

Misogyny

1

sentences flagged

Hate speech

16

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Coming up, we do a deep dive into Canada s relationship with its Indigenous citizens and its Indigenous communities. What are the problems and, more importantly, what are the solutions? The Andrew Lawton Show starts right now.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Welcome to Canada's Most Irreverent Talk Show.
00:00:06.660 This is The Andrew Lawton Show, brought to you by True North.
00:00:12.740 Coming up, we do a deep dive into Canada's relationship with its Indigenous peoples and its Indigenous communities.
00:00:19.720 What are the problems, and more importantly, what are the solutions?
00:00:25.240 The Andrew Lawton Show starts right now.
00:00:30.000 Hello, and welcome to The Andrew Lawton Show.
00:00:34.400 This is Canada's Most Irreverent Talk Show here on True North.
00:00:37.980 It's the Friday show, which means we do things a little bit differently.
00:00:41.220 Rather than delving into the news of the day, which this past week has been rather depressing,
00:00:46.880 we take a big issue and do a deep dive into it, not necessarily trying to solve all the problems of the world,
00:00:52.160 but certainly trying to give it the attention and insight it very much needs.
00:00:56.380 And the issue I want to talk about today is the relationship that Canada has with its Indigenous citizens and its Indigenous communities.
00:01:04.940 Every election this comes up, between elections this comes up.
00:01:08.520 We have stories about energy projects being met with Indigenous or purportedly Indigenous protesters.
00:01:14.480 We have the announcements of unmarked graves at the sites of former residential schools.
00:01:19.280 We had Justin Trudeau lowering the Canadian flag.
00:01:22.040 We have all of these things, but are we anywhere close to finding a solution to these challenges?
00:01:28.640 Is such a solution even possible?
00:01:30.900 We have two fantastic guests here to discuss this.
00:01:34.180 Melissa Embarkey is an Indigenous woman herself, a policy analyst and outreach coordinator at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute,
00:01:40.960 and also a woman with over 14 years of experience in Canada's oil and gas sector.
00:01:46.240 Also, we have Dr. Heather Exner-Perot, a fellow with the Macdonald-Laurier Institute,
00:01:51.520 and a researcher who's done a number of work in political science,
00:01:54.940 but also specifically looking at Indigenous issues, Northern issues, and Indigenous economic development.
00:02:01.420 Heather, Melissa, thank you both so much. It's good to have you here.
00:02:04.660 Thanks for having us.
00:02:06.360 I want to start with you on this one, Melissa.
00:02:08.720 When we talk about these issues between Indigenous communities and Canada,
00:02:12.880 or the Canadian government specifically, is it clear what we're even talking about here?
00:02:17.600 I know that there tends to be this view of Indigenous people as one homogenous group,
00:02:22.520 which we know is not the case.
00:02:24.160 There are issues in the north, issues in the west, issues in my part of the country, in southern Ontario,
00:02:29.880 clean drinking water, energy projects, resistance to energy projects.
00:02:33.920 So what are we really talking about here as being the problem or problems?
00:02:38.400 That's true. I mean, the concerns that you would have in Saskatchewan where I grew up
00:02:42.280 aren't going to be the same concerns that you have in British Columbia, for example.
00:02:46.800 So we have to really parse out what the issue is.
00:02:50.160 We need to know the area that's in question.
00:02:52.580 We need to kind of know, you know, what's in conflict, you know, what are these communities
00:02:57.860 not agreeing on?
00:02:59.640 And I think we really have to start at the grassroots level.
00:03:02.100 Like, is this an issue within the community that doesn't necessarily deal with, you know,
00:03:09.280 operators or natural resource development?
00:03:11.820 And a lot of the times what you're going to see is that it's actually issues within the communities themselves.
00:03:16.880 And, you know, and it kind of pours out into the public as an opposition to something which isn't true.
00:03:22.740 So let me just drill down into that a little bit further if I can here, because when we are talking
00:03:30.020 about experiences or frustrations that Indigenous Canadians hold that require political solutions
00:03:36.780 in some way, we'll narrow it down a little bit there.
00:03:39.400 How many of these issues are really just general concerns that impact all Canadians in the same
00:03:44.860 way that, you know, affordability, taxes and regulations do versus concerns that are very
00:03:50.160 specific to Indigenous people?
00:03:52.180 Well, what we can see and what I've been seeing in the last little while is, you know, when
00:03:58.160 you have an, take for example, under Bill C-15, this directly impacted Indigenous communities
00:04:04.140 and it impacted, you know, people like myself.
00:04:06.980 Whereas if I'm looking, you know, broader and more general, when you look at urban areas,
00:04:13.040 that's not going to be an issue, you know, so we have to look at the bills and who they
00:04:18.000 impact and how they impact them, because it could impact us differently than it would a
00:04:23.480 Canadian, you know, a taxpayer in an urban area.
00:04:27.620 So even with water, we have to look at, you know, different facets of it, you know, we have to look
00:04:33.600 at it from a municipality level, from a reserve perspective, and even right down to, you know,
00:04:39.580 you know, can we access water from other sources?
00:04:42.780 So we're intertwined in a lot of ways, but bills and legislation that goes through is often very
00:04:49.660 specific for reserves.
00:04:51.560 And we need to kind of look at that from, like, from an internal reserve, you know, perspective.
00:04:58.260 Whereas, you know, from your perspective, it might not be an issue, but for us, it would be pretty big.
00:05:03.580 How did you, Heather, get so tied in with Indigenous issues in the first place?
00:05:09.880 A good question.
00:05:10.980 I'm not an Indigenous person.
00:05:12.340 I'm from Saskatchewan.
00:05:13.740 And I think growing up in Saskatchewan in the 90s, we didn't talk about treaties.
00:05:17.400 We didn't talk about residential schools.
00:05:19.020 There was none of that.
00:05:19.780 I went through university in a social sciences degree and had almost no Indigenous content at
00:05:25.520 the University of Saskatchewan in the 90s.
00:05:27.800 So it was actually when I did my master's, I did it.
00:05:29.980 I liked, you know, international development was a big thing.
00:05:33.400 And I did it in Southern Chile with the Weiche and the Mapuche people. 1.00
00:05:38.720 And then when I came back to Canada, it was like, oh, we have a lot of these same Indigenous 0.73
00:05:42.220 issues here, too.
00:05:44.340 So I just started working on that, started working on some Arctic things, which is, you
00:05:48.000 know, a lot of Indigenous things there.
00:05:50.240 And then did start doing more Northern and Indigenous development.
00:05:53.480 And that's how I got involved with Saskatchewan Indigenous Economic Development Network.
00:05:56.260 And I guess my PhD is in political science, but, you know, and Melissa knows this, too.
00:06:01.240 When you start to think about all the problems, water, poverty, education, housing, things
00:06:06.320 like that, health, mental health, addictions, trauma, the solution is often found in economic
00:06:13.640 development, having jobs, having resources, having opportunities so that the community can
00:06:19.540 solve these issues themselves and not have to rely on the federal government.
00:06:22.100 So I think you touched on a very important part of the discussion here when you bring
00:06:27.040 up economic development, because I've read a lot of frustrations in particular from Indigenous 1.00
00:06:32.020 folks in Canada about what seem like very symbolic responses.
00:06:36.720 And that could be the flag being lowered, the Canadian flag being lowered for several months,
00:06:41.340 statues coming down, commemorations around residential schools.
00:06:45.120 And it's not to say that there's anything bad or disqualifying about doing any of these
00:06:50.160 issues. But if you're not accompanying it with anything that's solving these underlying
00:06:54.420 issues, you're not really doing all that much.
00:06:56.720 So why is economic development, in your view, the road to solving a lot of those concerns
00:07:02.560 that you just laid out there that are very distinct?
00:07:05.840 From my perspective, self-determination is maybe the most important human and community right.
00:07:11.300 Nations deserve to have self-determination.
00:07:13.240 I think most people can agree with that.
00:07:14.880 That's the fundamental Western, liberal, Indigenous kind of value.
00:07:19.020 And in the last 30, 40 years, First Nations peoples, Métis peoples, Inuit people have
00:07:23.440 made great strides in political self-determination, getting kind of de jure, legal, more control,
00:07:30.400 more power over their affairs.
00:07:32.000 But that has not been paired with economic self-determination.
00:07:35.040 So when you still rely on the federal government for 80 or 90% of your revenues, it's very hard
00:07:40.140 to be self-determining.
00:07:41.120 It's very hard to make your own decisions and you still have to go and get permission
00:07:44.580 for the minister and the Indian Act to do any of those things or get funding if you want
00:07:48.780 to do more in housing or education or health.
00:07:51.280 So for me, having that, the independence that comes from having your own sources of revenues
00:07:57.560 and not relying on another level of government, which is often antagonistic, is the best way
00:08:04.040 for First Nations to have self-determination and therefore make their own decisions, which we
00:08:09.300 know in governance and political science theory are going to be better decisions than other
00:08:12.800 people making those for them.
00:08:14.600 We know, Melissa, there are some very wealthy communities, especially out west, that can
00:08:20.260 rely very heavily on natural resource development.
00:08:24.400 There are also communities that don't have that to lean on.
00:08:27.240 Some communities in the far north that don't have necessarily oil resources and southern
00:08:32.220 Ontario, Quebec that don't as well.
00:08:34.220 So is that idea of being able to develop economically something that can be more evenly attained or
00:08:40.940 is it very limited to just that kind of one part of the country, the west?
00:08:45.400 Well, I definitely think, you know, sovereignty is the key in this because each community knows
00:08:50.120 how they can move forward and better their community.
00:08:55.620 Mine, for example, like we don't have access to natural resources, but where we've invested
00:09:00.760 is in bringing our child and family services back to my community.
00:09:04.800 So we've worked with provincial and federal government to do this.
00:09:07.860 And in addition to this, you know, we're opening a treatment center, we're opening a family
00:09:11.640 healing center.
00:09:12.960 So we're doing things, you know, that will bring jobs to our community.
00:09:17.100 Not a whole lot of jobs that a natural resource sector would bring, but they are jobs, long-term
00:09:21.700 jobs nonetheless.
00:09:23.140 So we have to listen to First Nations communities and what they want.
00:09:27.040 You know, we can't be telling them you need to do this, this, and this, because each area
00:09:30.960 is different.
00:09:31.980 Some are more north, some are south, some are in areas, you know, but next to urban areas
00:09:36.660 like Enoch First Nation is next to Edmonton.
00:09:39.240 So they have a better chance of being economically independent, whereas some reserves don't.
00:09:45.140 So this is where each voice matters.
00:09:47.340 And this is where listening to the communities matter, because what they want and what they
00:09:52.940 need, you know, they've thought this through.
00:09:54.800 And like-minded.
00:09:56.600 So that's why it is important to listen to the elected chief and councils and what they
00:10:01.060 are asking for.
00:10:02.840 I'd like to talk in a bit of detail with you both about what it is that Indigenous communities
00:10:07.780 want.
00:10:08.280 And I realized that this could change from community to community.
00:10:11.980 And I mean, growing up, and this could be coming from a place of ignorance, the primary
00:10:15.660 concern that I was exposed to involved land claims.
00:10:19.000 And, you know, I'm from Southern Ontario.
00:10:20.520 We had a couple of very high-profile cases about land claims and about land development
00:10:25.440 and these sorts of community projects that were encroaching on territory that was in dispute.
00:10:32.260 How central are the land claim issues still in 2021 to a lot of the concerns?
00:10:38.000 Oh, there's a lot of concerns with land claims, because if anything, they take decades to resolve.
00:10:45.800 Like, this isn't a process that's going to happen tomorrow.
00:10:48.600 So I think what the government needs to do is they need to eliminate some of that red tape
00:10:52.300 in between, you know, and they need to start working with First Nations on where their land
00:10:57.460 is and result these claims.
00:11:00.940 You know, otherwise we're going to continue seeing protests.
00:11:02.960 We're going to continue seeing, you know, delays in everything.
00:11:07.520 So I think what we need to do is definitely start working on those TLE land claims in Saskatchewan,
00:11:14.380 get them finalized, you know, work on Ontario, get those finalized.
00:11:17.940 Let's get those out of the way first so that First Nations can thrive and succeed.
00:11:22.900 And you touched on something there that I imagine is just a massive, massive undertaking.
00:11:28.180 And I don't know, politically in Canada, and I'll go to you on this, Heather, is that even
00:11:33.200 possible within, you know, one, two, or three terms of a government to resolve this?
00:11:39.580 I think people need to know, like, a land claim in the north is not the same as land claim
00:11:44.200 in Saskatchewan is not the same as a land claim in BC, because the history and the governance
00:11:49.320 and the agreements were all made at different times and on different things.
00:11:52.740 And so in BC, where, you know, there was no treaty is a very different situation from
00:11:57.840 Saskatchewan, where it was just not enough was given, you know, in what was promised
00:12:02.480 originally.
00:12:03.240 And in the north, again, it's kind of a whole different cattle of fish.
00:12:08.020 So, so, so these are, there's moving targets.
00:12:11.200 The other thing is that there's two parties to this.
00:12:13.940 And so maybe a federal government would like to settle something in BC, but the community
00:12:17.740 is not ready to come to an agreement or hasn't had the time to do their due diligence
00:12:21.940 or doesn't have the capacity to do their due diligence in the settlement either.
00:12:25.800 And sometimes maybe it's the federal government that's dragging their heels.
00:12:28.440 So it's not, you know, there are different circumstances with different communities
00:12:32.120 and how that happens.
00:12:34.160 Why do we want these settled?
00:12:35.740 I think if you're interested in economic development and resource development, knowing who gets
00:12:40.280 to make the final decision, who's the decision maker, who can enter agreements under what
00:12:44.500 conditions would be very helpful.
00:12:46.900 Obviously, we're seeing that now with wet swim territory where there's, you know, confusion
00:12:51.340 over who is able to enter these agreements.
00:12:53.820 And you don't have quite the same problem in the north.
00:12:56.660 There are some competing claims, but to a lesser extent, or in the treaty areas, you know,
00:13:01.240 where, again, it is more settled.
00:13:03.240 So just having that certainty of knowing who gets to make the decisions and how their impacts,
00:13:08.060 I think that people don't appreciate, I'm sure Melissa would agree, most indigenous people 1.00
00:13:11.980 are not against resource development.
00:13:13.920 They're against being left out.
00:13:15.640 So if you're going to have development in their territory, not consult, not avoid sacred sites,
00:13:21.020 not involve people and the economic benefits that comes from it, yes, that's going to be
00:13:24.600 a problem.
00:13:25.520 But if you have settled land claims, the community is involved, the nation's involved, they've
00:13:29.380 agreed to a set of terms, they've agreed to the benefits, they have time prepared to benefit,
00:13:35.160 then they will probably be in favor.
00:13:36.980 Almost, you know, there are hundreds and hundreds of mining agreements, forestry agreements,
00:13:40.820 oil and gas agreements.
00:13:42.440 More often than not, they want that.
00:13:43.840 So just having the certainty for the developer, for the nation, for all levels of government
00:13:48.240 over whose land it is, who has title is so important.
00:13:52.560 Well, I know that was a big issue.
00:13:53.780 I think it was early last year with Tech Frontier withdrawing from its project or Tech
00:13:59.700 withdrawing from the Frontier project.
00:14:01.600 And one of the big concerns was a lot of the uncertainty surrounding indigenous communities
00:14:06.620 and pushback they were nervous about from protests.
00:14:10.140 And when you hear stories like that, Melissa, what's your take on it?
00:14:13.380 Because you've obviously been connected to indigenous people that really want these projects,
00:14:17.820 yet at the same time, for a lot of companies, they just see, they see a lot of indigenous
00:14:22.800 protests as being barriers to development.
00:14:25.880 I think, you know, we kind of see something similar in my own community where we agreed on
00:14:31.560 something, you know, the Chief and Council got 80% buy-in from the people.
00:14:35.900 And we had four or five people who weren't in agreeance to it.
00:14:41.840 So, you know, they were causing some chaos and they were, you know, trying to block highways
00:14:45.860 and trying to block railroads because they didn't agree with this, with what was proposed.
00:14:51.700 So what ended up happening is, you know, we tried to incorporate them more into the discussions.
00:14:58.320 You know, we tried to get, you know, specific answers of why they opposed it.
00:15:02.920 You know, we got their side of the story of, you know, kind of where their thinking was going.
00:15:07.780 And I think that's what most First Nations need to do.
00:15:09.920 You need to include the people, even the ones that are opposing it.
00:15:13.620 And we need to understand why.
00:15:15.600 And we need to look at the specific reasons why.
00:15:17.900 And I think if First Nations communities don't do this, they're going to see more opposition.
00:15:21.740 Like, it's just going to grow and grow and grow.
00:15:23.320 So part of it is up to us, you know, to make sure that education and knowledge is given at the right times.
00:15:30.180 And, you know, and even including them in decisions along the way.
00:15:34.540 Because if that's not happening, you're going to always have that divide.
00:15:37.800 So I think as First Nations, that's kind of what we have to deal with now is we have to get communities on board
00:15:43.220 and get everyone on board with the decision making.
00:15:46.320 And I'll add to that, Andrew, because I think the Frontier case is an interesting one
00:15:50.820 because the affected communities in the territory, and there's a little bit of discretion about who decides who's in the territory.
00:15:57.000 But they were all in support.
00:15:58.240 They had, you know, their agreements in place with TEC.
00:16:02.280 And the uncertainty came from whether the federal government would approve it anyways.
00:16:06.600 So the uncertainty was 100% on the federal side.
00:16:09.640 In that case, TEC did a good job actually consulting with First Nations and Métis settlements around there.
00:16:15.420 And so, and that's the problem you're seeing today.
00:16:18.700 And I think people are blaming, and Melissa knows this, people will blame First Nations.
00:16:22.900 But the problem is often not with the First Nations side.
00:16:25.340 It's with, you know, the political side of governments who, you know, maybe urban, you know,
00:16:31.060 their urban voters aren't in paper project, even though it doesn't impact them directly.
00:16:35.000 And then having to try to navigate that.
00:16:37.440 And it's certainly, like, we've lost, like, over $100 billion, $150 billion in energy projects
00:16:43.680 in the last four years in Canada.
00:16:45.980 We will lose mining projects.
00:16:47.480 We are not a competitive space for resource development because it is not easy to get a
00:16:51.520 permit.
00:16:51.920 It is not easy to get regulatory approval.
00:16:54.060 And you can spend hundreds of millions of dollars.
00:16:56.400 Northern Gateway spent $700 million, some people say more, to get to the point of getting told
00:17:01.440 no.
00:17:02.160 And we're seeing Keystone XL do that too, suing the Biden administration $15 billion that they
00:17:07.360 sunk into this after getting all the approvals.
00:17:09.460 So there's a lot of blame being laid at the feet of First Nations, but I don't think that's
00:17:14.660 usually where the problem is.
00:17:16.680 Well, that actually touches on, I think, a very important point, which is that we see
00:17:20.800 a lot of people in Canada who are ideologically against oil and gas sector development.
00:17:27.560 They're against pipelines that tend to latch on to Indigenous causes or purported Indigenous
00:17:33.960 causes.
00:17:34.580 And I know when you see some of these photos from some of these events, you're looking and
00:17:39.260 you're like, these are just environmental activists that I'm not sure are even from
00:17:42.720 this community.
00:17:43.900 How big an issue is that, Melissa?
00:17:46.260 That's a really big issue.
00:17:47.680 And a good example is the Wet'suwet'en community. 1.00
00:17:50.620 You know, like they took advantage of that divide.
00:17:53.520 And they took advantage of the people who opposed the pipelines.
00:17:56.320 And they sided with them and media, you know, the media ran with it and, you know, told the
00:18:02.140 story that wasn't necessarily the true story of what was going on.
00:18:07.200 And, you know, I think what we need to do is we need to hear all sides of the story.
00:18:11.120 And this is why I think Chief and Counsel is really important in getting that messaging
00:18:15.260 out.
00:18:15.820 Because at the end of the day, they're the ones that make the decisions.
00:18:18.340 And they're the ones that go through this consultation process.
00:18:22.060 Like, they're the ones that are on the ground trying to get these deals completed, finished,
00:18:27.200 signed.
00:18:27.860 And yet, they're the ones that are kind of, you know, they're kind of vilified in a sense
00:18:32.140 when they do say, yes, I'm in agreeance to this because of outsiders who may not agree
00:18:38.120 with the project.
00:18:39.220 So it's a very thin line, you know, that we're walking.
00:18:42.260 And we need to, and I come from the space where we need to tell all sides of the story.
00:18:46.300 We can't just tell one.
00:18:48.340 I want to talk for a moment, if we can, about that idea of the lack of homogeneity within
00:18:56.140 the Indigenous communities in Canada.
00:18:58.300 Because there isn't just one leader or one spokesperson that can represent all Indigenous
00:19:04.180 people.
00:19:04.780 And I know this is a challenge.
00:19:06.300 If you did have a leader, a Prime Minister that really wanted to get down and deal with
00:19:10.880 this and address the concerns, who are they negotiating with?
00:19:14.260 Who are they engaging in dialogue with?
00:19:16.120 And I was wondering if you could speak to that, Heather.
00:19:17.680 I mean, how complex would that process be to really completely start from scratch on
00:19:23.160 the Crown-Indigenous relationship in Canada?
00:19:25.360 Well, there's, I mean, there's so much going on there, as you know, Andrew.
00:19:30.840 So a lot of the problems stems from the fact that, you know, the Indian Act kind of disrupted
00:19:35.480 traditional governance systems and created this, you know, a democratically elected chief
00:19:40.240 and counsel who weren't necessarily representative, you know, for the first hundred years, you know,
00:19:43.960 it was maybe more the, you know, acting kind of as an Indian agent.
00:19:47.360 But now that has evolved.
00:19:48.420 And so now almost every First Nation, I think every First Nation uses elections, even if
00:19:54.040 they have had their own land claim and could choose a different system, but people still
00:19:58.380 prefer normally a democratically elected system and a chief and counsel.
00:20:02.840 But it's different in different places.
00:20:04.580 In some parts in the prairies, there isn't a hereditary system anymore.
00:20:08.840 Or, you know, it's been absorbed into kind of a democratic system, where in B.C., in some
00:20:14.620 communities and some nations, there are still the two kinds.
00:20:17.040 So it's not as though there's hereditary chiefs or that there's the same governance system all
00:20:21.400 across Canada and it's just, you know, out of control in B.C. or something like that.
00:20:26.880 And in lots of cases like the Haida, you know, they built it into the Constitution. 1.00
00:20:31.160 It works well.
00:20:32.340 They have figured out a way for elected and hereditary chiefs to work, you know, for the best
00:20:36.900 well-being of the community.
00:20:38.700 So it's not as though it's an inherently dysfunctional system to have a traditional and an elective
00:20:43.860 council.
00:20:44.860 But just, you know, in this particular community, there's a big polarization and going back to
00:20:49.320 your earlier question, people are definitely using the Wet'suwet'en Nation to further their
00:20:54.560 own agenda, probably on both sides, but I think a little bit more on the other side to blatantly,
00:21:00.000 you know, disregard the fact that the elected councils are in favor to disregard the fact the
00:21:05.940 majority of people in favor have voted for this in referendums, have reelected chiefs and
00:21:10.880 councillors who are in favor of it to just disregard all those people because they prefer
00:21:15.100 the hereditary chiefs message in this case.
00:21:17.560 And yet, you know, on C-48 in the Haida Nation, we're happy to strip hereditary chiefs of their 0.98
00:21:22.720 titles because they supported oil and gas.
00:21:24.720 Or we're happy to strip hereditary chiefs of the Wet'suwet'en of their titles because 0.99
00:21:28.800 they supported LNG.
00:21:29.720 So there is definitely some selective support for Indigenous rights.
00:21:33.880 And it does, you know, it does look like to the observer that you support Indigenous rights
00:21:39.240 when Indigenous rights support your agenda.
00:21:41.660 And if the hereditary chiefs took a different stance on this, I don't think they would get
00:21:46.260 the same kind of support.
00:21:47.260 I think we all know that.
00:21:48.660 I appreciate the background on the elected versus the hereditary chiefs, because I know
00:21:53.400 that's been a source of confusion, especially through some of these protests in the last
00:21:57.900 year and a bit.
00:21:58.780 I mean, my question was more about nationally.
00:22:01.500 There's no one national leader of all Indigenous communities who could go to the federal government
00:22:07.020 and negotiate on behalf of those.
00:22:09.660 So I'm just interested in what a renegotiation of the Indian Act and a renegotiation of the
00:22:17.080 government's relationships with Indigenous people would look like.
00:22:19.740 How big would that be?
00:22:21.400 And does that mean it would be too big to really be possible in our political system?
00:22:26.040 I'll speak to that quickly, Mala.
00:22:27.280 So the strategy that the federal government has chosen is to use opt-in legislation.
00:22:31.800 So there are quite a few federal government legislations that remove parts of the Indian
00:22:37.380 Act.
00:22:37.700 So the First Nations Land Management Act, First Nations Oil and Gas Management Act, First 0.66
00:22:41.840 Nations Election Act, which communities can opt into.
00:22:45.380 So when they negotiate it, it doesn't mean the 674, however you count it, First Nations
00:22:50.440 all have to say yes or all have to say no.
00:22:52.760 But they can take their turn and decide for themselves when they opt-in.
00:22:56.760 So the Land Management Act, Melissa probably knows this very well, takes away about a third
00:23:00.600 of the Indian Act.
00:23:01.940 All the sections, provisions of the Indian Act that provide for the lands.
00:23:06.780 And that can turn over to the community.
00:23:08.120 And the community develops its own land code.
00:23:09.660 So that's, and for me, that's the only logical strategy.
00:23:12.880 You can't force 670 plus First Nations to agree on something.
00:23:17.360 They are independent nations.
00:23:19.320 And so this opt-in, you know, strategy, I think is not perfect, but probably the least imperfect.
00:23:25.200 Do you want to add on to that, Melissa?
00:23:28.760 Yeah, I think what needs to happen is you need to start giving some of these communities,
00:23:32.640 the ones who are ready, you need to start giving them sovereignty.
00:23:35.500 And you need to start giving them autonomy on certain, you know, when it comes to land,
00:23:40.680 for example, from the Indian Act, they need to be able to manage their land the way they
00:23:44.780 see fit.
00:23:46.040 And we're not seeing, you know, the government let go of this control.
00:23:49.620 If anything, you know, they try to implement more control on First Nations communities. 0.50
00:23:54.660 So what we need to see is we need to give them the resources to manage their communities,
00:23:59.820 you know, and this would, you know, help them come up with solutions to some of their issues
00:24:04.600 like poverty or child and family.
00:24:07.400 So the more autonomy that you give them, you know, the better that they're going to be
00:24:10.660 managing their systems.
00:24:12.240 It's going to bring jobs to those communities. 0.97
00:24:13.860 It's going to bring, they're going to thrive at the end of the day.
00:24:17.420 And that's what we want to see.
00:24:18.700 But with the Indian Act, it's really constrained.
00:24:22.240 And you can't, like Heather said, you can't apply to all the First Nations reserves in
00:24:26.560 Canada because each is different.
00:24:28.500 So I think we have to get out of this mindset that we're a monolith.
00:24:31.600 We all operate the same way because we don't.
00:24:34.220 And, you know, this is where sovereignty comes into play.
00:24:36.660 If you give these communities a chance to make their own decisions, they're going to be
00:24:41.140 decisions that are the best for them and for the rest of Canada.
00:24:44.280 So what would sovereignty, we'll start with the land aspect specifically, management of
00:24:49.680 land, Melissa, what would sovereignty look like in practice?
00:24:52.800 And more importantly, what has the government really used as its primary argument against
00:24:58.200 granting that?
00:24:59.060 So land can be tricky.
00:25:02.600 You know, you can have land that's directly, you know, with the reserve or First Nation,
00:25:09.920 and then you can have land that was purchased by the First Nations.
00:25:13.140 So they have different titles that go along with them.
00:25:16.200 One could be federal and the other, they would own their title, like they would own that land
00:25:20.600 and it would be titled to them.
00:25:22.000 So allowing First Nations to, you know, utilize the reserve land, the federal land, the way
00:25:27.160 they see fit, because that's often where they want to do their, you know, it's often where
00:25:32.600 the extraction is, you know, in the land that they purchase could potentially be for more
00:25:38.200 homes or for more housing or for, you know, for, to provide a place for people to live.
00:25:44.600 So that's what we're kind of seeing in my community.
00:25:47.020 Whereas, you know, others, they might want to purchase land within a city or on the outside,
00:25:52.460 outskirts of a city and, you know, provide homes for their community members that are off 0.63
00:25:57.560 reserve.
00:25:57.860 So, you know, allowing us to do this and allowing us to, you know, work with cities, work with
00:26:03.280 urban planners, that would be a huge step, you know, regarding land and being able to
00:26:08.600 house our people.
00:26:11.120 And what's been the source of the government's resistance there?
00:26:14.260 I think the resistance is that when you're on reserve federal land, you're more controlled.
00:26:19.360 When you own your own land and it's titled and you're operating it the way you want, the
00:26:23.940 way you see fit, you know, there's, there's a balance that needs to happen.
00:26:28.420 And I think the government, from my perspective, is holding on to that control.
00:26:32.360 You know, they don't want to see autonomy.
00:26:34.260 They don't want to see us doing things that are out of their scope because, you know, it's
00:26:40.120 easier to control a group of people on a reserve than it is to control people off.
00:26:44.620 So, I mean, this is a very complicated issue because it's not, first of all, as a political
00:26:51.360 science, you know, PhD, I'm still good for the word sovereignty.
00:26:55.120 And so, for me, it's more self-governance, self-determination in kind of the international
00:26:59.860 system.
00:27:00.660 I don't think, I don't know of any First Nations or Inuit or Maitre Settlements that
00:27:04.260 want to have their own monetary, you know, their own currency or their own defense or
00:27:07.760 their own passport system.
00:27:08.860 So, not sovereign in the same way that we would think about it, you know, kind of in an
00:27:12.380 international context.
00:27:13.740 But having more control over lands is also, is not always easy for First Nations.
00:27:18.320 Some of these communities are two or three or 400 people and have limited capacity and
00:27:22.900 limited resources and are reluctant to take over more control unless maybe you agree with
00:27:28.960 me or don't.
00:27:29.820 Because as it is now, the federal government has a fiduciary duty.
00:27:33.340 If there is, you know, if there was the garbage dump leaked into the nearby stream, it would
00:27:37.800 be the federal government's liability.
00:27:39.540 They would have to pay for it.
00:27:41.320 If there was some other, you know, kind of settlement or appeal, the federal government
00:27:45.320 would have to pay for it.
00:27:46.180 It would have to pay for the legal costs.
00:27:47.280 It would have to pay for the mediation.
00:27:49.100 So, under the Land Management Act, for example, First Nation can take over more control and
00:27:53.620 then make their own laws and have their own land code.
00:27:55.600 And many have chosen to do that.
00:27:57.140 But some that are reluctant to do it are reluctant because they don't want to have to absorb the
00:28:01.140 costs and the human resources and the know-how and the management of those lands that right
00:28:06.280 now the federal government does for them.
00:28:08.080 So, sometimes it is a simple capacity issue or there's mistrust in the community that, you
00:28:12.800 know, the members won't vote for that in a referendum because they don't trust that
00:28:15.840 their chief and councillor, their administration would do a good job, a better job doing it.
00:28:20.720 So, different, and Melissa alluded to this, different communities are at different stages
00:28:25.520 of their evolution to self-determination.
00:28:28.220 And we need to respect that.
00:28:29.720 And maybe a smaller community is not ready to take on, a community of 200 or 300, to take
00:28:35.000 on all the responsibilities that a large municipality, even a province, would have.
00:28:38.840 Those are big, heavy things, you know, that only 200 people have to manage.
00:28:43.120 Education, health, you know, lands management, all these things, housing.
00:28:47.400 And then some other big ones.
00:28:49.480 I, for example, live on the Satina Nation outside of Calgary.
00:28:53.000 We have, they have a subdivision, a residential subdivision.
00:28:55.640 I pay my lease money to them every month and they're a very wealthy, very well-organized,
00:29:00.760 sophisticated nation and have been able to take over more of that authority and are comfortable
00:29:05.240 with that and are sophisticated and are doing that.
00:29:07.320 So, different communities are at different stages of this evolution.
00:29:11.000 It takes a lot of resources.
00:29:12.520 It takes a lot of capacity to manage your own lands.
00:29:15.000 And some aren't prepared to release the federal government of their fiduciary duties and assume
00:29:20.360 more sovereignty for themselves.
00:29:23.000 If that flexibility already exists to some extent, what are the structural barriers in place
00:29:28.280 that are preventing this vision that Melissa's put forward from being realized then?
00:29:32.440 But, sorry, I guess structural, are there structural barriers in the laws themselves as
00:29:37.000 they're written, I guess, is the better way of putting the question.
00:29:40.360 I mean, it definitely, and Melissa will be willing to jump on this too.
00:29:45.160 Of course, the Indian Act has restrictions.
00:29:47.160 That's what we talk about.
00:29:48.360 Not being able to run at the speed of business.
00:29:50.360 Not being able to make decisions.
00:29:51.720 Not being able to get loans.
00:29:52.840 Not being able to use it as a leverage to get capital.
00:29:57.720 Having the minister has to have the final say on so many of these things,
00:30:01.160 if it's under the Indian Act and on reserve lands.
00:30:03.720 So, there's definitely barriers there.
00:30:05.880 But even in the case where there have been land claims and large settlements,
00:30:09.400 like Nunavut and Nunavut, you know, in the north, where they aren't restricted by the Indian Act,
00:30:17.000 there are still other structural barriers, capacity barriers, cultural barriers.
00:30:21.800 Let me get your thoughts on that capacity aspect, Melissa.
00:30:26.920 Is there a way to overcome that or overcome that mistrust idea?
00:30:31.560 Which is, I don't think, specific to Indigenous communities.
00:30:34.040 I certainly understand mistrust in politicians.
00:30:36.520 But how do you overcome that aspect of it?
00:30:38.840 That's very difficult, especially in an Indigenous community, because once you mistrust someone or a leader,
00:30:46.120 that lingers for a very long time.
00:30:48.680 You know, even if they'd come back and apologize,
00:30:51.640 it's still etched in our minds that this person did this.
00:30:55.560 So, it's very hard to come back and say, you know, let's fix this.
00:30:59.480 So, oftentimes what happens, you know, if it happens with one of our leaders,
00:31:04.120 we just don't vote them back in.
00:31:05.480 Or if it happens, you know, with a provincial government or federal government,
00:31:09.720 we just say, you know, we're not dealing with that person anymore.
00:31:12.920 So, it's very hard to, once that mistrust is there, it's very hard to come back from that.
00:31:18.360 Let me ask about the Indian Act, because this is something we hear people calling for its repeal.
00:31:23.400 And I know that if you were to undertake repealing the Indian Act,
00:31:27.160 you would need to have a very solid and clear vision of what would replace it.
00:31:32.520 Is that viable or desirable in your view, Melissa, to get rid of the Indian Act and start something new? 0.98
00:31:40.040 I would definitely amend it.
00:31:42.120 You know, like, instead of trying to come up with something new,
00:31:45.640 let's amend the parts that are broken.
00:31:47.400 You know, there are a lot, there are pieces in there that need to be revised.
00:31:51.400 There's a lot of amendment changes that have gone in that haven't even been addressed.
00:31:55.880 So, let's start there.
00:31:57.160 You know, if they're not even looking at amendments as an option,
00:32:00.280 well, maybe that's where we start.
00:32:02.280 And that's, you know, politically how it looks in a province or even federally.
00:32:07.320 You appeal or you try to amend a bill that's gone in.
00:32:11.800 You know, and we need to address the Indian Act in the same manner.
00:32:15.640 We don't need to do away with it, you know, because there are parts of it that are working.
00:32:20.200 But what we need to do is bring it up to speed, because it's no longer
00:32:24.200 a paper from the 1800s that's working in today's society.
00:32:27.880 So, we do need to start looking at some of the changes that we can make in it.
00:32:33.160 If you were a politician who were trying to do the best thing possible
00:32:39.400 for the Indigenous communities of Canada that is politically viable,
00:32:43.080 that is economically viable, where would be the starting point beyond sovereignty, Heather?
00:32:48.840 Let me just, first I'm going to answer the Indian Act.
00:32:52.440 Lots of ministers have had ambitions or thought that they could come in and take away the Indian Act.
00:32:56.920 And it was the old joke, I know, in the Department of Indian Affairs,
00:32:59.400 that one minister, a conservative minister, came in wanting to change the Indian Act.
00:33:03.080 And his nickname was Chief Running With Scissors.
00:33:05.880 Because anyone that wanted to change the Indian Act was, you know, in for a wild ride.
00:33:10.520 And it never works.
00:33:11.560 And like I mentioned before, there are legislations that have,
00:33:15.000 that allow communities to opt out of parts of the Indian Act.
00:33:18.680 And a lot of these have been brought forth by communities themselves,
00:33:21.080 you know, on oil and gas management or elections or land management,
00:33:24.680 where they say, we hate these parts of the Indian Act, we need an option.
00:33:28.600 And the federal government has played ball and created, you know, legislation that they can opt out.
00:33:33.480 But going back to your other question, Andrew, where would you start?
00:33:38.680 And again, you have to respect that there's so many different communities and nations in contact.
00:33:43.720 And so I think allowing them to have as much self-determination as they want.
00:33:48.840 And I think C-92, you know, we often criticize the liberal government.
00:33:51.960 They do a lot of crazy things.
00:33:53.080 But C-92 really was good legislation.
00:33:55.160 That's on child welfare and allowing communities to take over.
00:33:59.160 They never gave up.
00:34:00.040 They never said, you can take our kids and you can do our family care.
00:34:04.360 They never said that.
00:34:05.640 And so this isn't giving it back, but getting out of the way of First Nations 1.00
00:34:09.800 to reassert their jurisdiction over this.
00:34:12.280 And again, it's on a community-community basis.
00:34:14.760 The community decides they create their own laws.
00:34:17.320 They create their own structure.
00:34:18.520 There's funding available and deciding when do they and how do they want to take back over
00:34:23.480 child welfare.
00:34:24.280 And I think almost every Canadian could agree that you wouldn't want China to be in charge 1.00
00:34:28.440 of our kids, you know, child welfare.
00:34:30.440 So why did a First Nation want Canada to be in charge of their child welfare?
00:34:33.720 And we have a terrible record on it.
00:34:35.240 So these kinds of opportunities, we're providing a framework, providing support, providing time
00:34:41.560 and letting communities decide how and when they want to take back those parts of their own governance.
00:34:47.000 When we talk about that self-determination and sovereignty, I want to be clear on what it is
00:34:51.960 that we're discussing here.
00:34:53.560 Are we talking about communities that levy their own taxes, are responsible for their own spending,
00:34:59.080 that are basically mini countries with the exception of passport and defense and foreign affairs
00:35:05.320 within Canada?
00:35:06.200 Are we talking about something that looks a little bit more like Quebec, where the federal government
00:35:10.600 is giving them money, but they have a lot of autonomy and a lot of their own determination in
00:35:15.720 how they spend that money and how they allocate it?
00:35:19.320 I think it should look a lot like Quebec.
00:35:21.320 You know, they're part of Canada.
00:35:22.840 They're part of this country.
00:35:24.440 But yet they are given the economy to make decisions, you know, particularly for their province.
00:35:30.200 And I think that's how it should work within First Nations communities.
00:35:33.160 Like, we don't want to be separate and apart from Canada.
00:35:36.680 You know, we want to work with Canada.
00:35:38.040 We want to be part of this economy.
00:35:39.640 So kind of segregating us how we are is not working.
00:35:44.760 What we need to do is we need to, with self-determination, you know,
00:35:49.160 work with Canada and be part of this country.
00:35:51.240 Yeah, I mean, I think First Nations, they can and they should charge taxes. 1.00
00:35:56.360 And maybe they don't charge it to their own people because it's, you know, a big issue.
00:35:59.400 But they often charge fees, they often charge levies.
00:36:02.600 So that potential exists.
00:36:04.520 I pay, you know, I would pay to the Satina Nation, for example. 1.00
00:36:08.520 So there is that option.
00:36:09.640 But it's the scale.
00:36:12.600 There is no economy of scale.
00:36:14.280 Even Nunavut, which is a public government,
00:36:17.240 but is the closest thing to a large Indigenous government, 40,000 people,
00:36:21.480 still is going to be always reliant on the federal government.
00:36:23.800 That's still too few people to run all the services in the way that people in Canada
00:36:28.120 expect modern services.
00:36:29.240 So for me, the more that Indigenous groups can operate in tribal councils
00:36:33.880 or regional councils or treaty areas to pool those services and have that economy of scale,
00:36:40.120 the better.
00:36:41.880 But, you know, it's their land.
00:36:45.720 We're all benefiting from it.
00:36:47.640 So I don't think there's, you know, anything wrong or unjust in, you know,
00:36:50.760 of having some transfers from the federal government and some support on the governance side,
00:36:56.040 where they want it and how they want it.
00:36:58.360 Melissa Embarkey, policy analyst and outreach coordinator for the McDonnell-Laurie Institute,
00:37:03.240 also a veteran of the oil and gas sector in Canada.
00:37:06.760 And Dr. Heather Exner-Perot, fellow at the McDonnell-Laurie Institute.
00:37:10.920 And many, many titles connected to any number of resource and northern projects,
00:37:15.640 including the Saskatchewan Indigenous Economic Development Network
00:37:18.840 and the Canadian Rural Revitalization Foundation.
00:37:21.960 Heather, Melissa, thank you both so much.
00:37:23.480 This was a very informative discussion.
00:37:25.640 I appreciate your time.
00:37:27.160 Thank you.
00:37:27.400 Thanks for having us.
00:37:29.640 You know, it's such a complex issue.
00:37:32.440 And I was really trying.
00:37:33.880 I didn't expect that we'd have solved all the problems of Canada after just 40 minutes.
00:37:38.520 But I realized that getting even just a few concrete politically viable solutions
00:37:45.160 that a politician could champion would be very difficult.
00:37:48.440 And I think the big takeaway from there is that we're not just talking about one Indigenous community
00:37:53.560 or even a community that has one particular voice.
00:37:57.080 You've got certainly national groups like the Assembly of First Nations.
00:38:00.920 But even then, they may not speak for the interests and needs of all of these different
00:38:05.240 communities that are impacted.
00:38:07.000 I think, like anything, the best advice is to let the government get out of the way.
00:38:12.120 And this is not something that I would say is unique to Indigenous Canadians entirely.
00:38:16.600 I would like to see the federal government get out of the way of provinces.
00:38:19.400 I'd like to see provinces get out of the way of the municipalities.
00:38:22.520 We're not talking about mass separation or secession or even segregation,
00:38:26.920 but a recognition that different people want different things.
00:38:31.240 Different groups of Canadians in different regional parts of the country want different things.
00:38:36.280 So no simple answers. But again, we don't do these segments for simple answers.
00:38:40.200 We do them to really delve into the scope of some of the challenges and
00:38:44.280 hopefully have a bit more of an honest discussion about them than we see in federal politics.
00:38:49.320 So with that, my thanks again to Heather and Melissa and to all of you for tuning in.
00:38:53.560 We'll be back Tuesday with more of Canada's most irreverent talk show here on True North.
00:38:58.680 This is The Andrew Lawton Show. Thank you, God bless, and good day.
00:39:01.640 Thanks for listening to The Andrew Lawton Show.
00:39:03.880 Support the program by donating to True North at www.tnc.news.