Juno News - October 02, 2024


J.D. Vance DOMINATES debate, Tim “Knucklehead” Walz flounders

Topics
Hosted by
Mentioned
Former addict exposes government funded opioid crisis Canada told to PREPARE for WAR?!

Episode Stats


Length

26 minutes

Words per minute

219.28

Word count

5,920

Sentence count

335

Harmful content

Misogyny

6

sentences flagged

Toxicity

3

sentences flagged

Hate speech

5

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

VP candidates J.D. Vance and Tim Walls squared off in their debate last night in a performance that everyone, even the mainstream media, is saying was a resounding victory for the Republican nominee, Donald Trump. We'll dive into all that now, on Rachel in the Republic.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Hughes Kamala Harris of inviting drug mules. I said that she enabled the Mexican drug cartels 1.00
00:00:05.280 to operate freely in this country. And we know that they use children as drug mules and it is
00:00:10.180 a disgrace and it has to stop. Vice presidential candidates J.D. Vance and Tim Walls squared off
00:00:16.480 in their debate last night in a performance that everyone, even the mainstream media,
00:00:21.320 is saying was a resounding victory for J.D. Vance. Walls appeared rattled and unprepared
00:00:28.520 throughout the night while the Republican VP pick was calm, cool, and collected. He delivered the
00:00:34.640 facts and a vision of an optimistic and hopeful future under Donald Trump. And he even tripped
00:00:40.540 up the moderators in their own lies. We'll dive into all that now on I'm Rachel Parker and you're
00:00:46.180 watching Rachel in the Republic. Hey everyone, welcome back to Rachel in the Republic. I'm your
00:00:58.460 host Rachel Parker. We are going to be covering the vice presidential debate on today's show. That
00:01:03.540 was last night. It was an excellent debate to watch. If you guys are interested in this stuff,
00:01:08.560 I would highly recommend you go back and take a look at it. When we're talking about the VP debates
00:01:13.940 with Tim Walls and J.D. Vance, it was really a lot of what we didn't see in the debate with Donald
00:01:20.420 Trump. We obviously have covered that debate so much on this show. And as I've said, you know,
00:01:24.880 it wasn't the performance that I think a lot of Republicans were hoping for. But in the end,
00:01:29.520 it ultimately appeared that Trump came out ahead with sort of that unexpected moment,
00:01:33.940 even when he was talking about they're eating the cats and eating the dogs. And that became the clip
00:01:37.980 that everyone remembers from that debate night. And even the polls, you know, Kamala Harris didn't do 0.98
00:01:44.340 enough to persuade those middle of American voters who aren't sure who they're going to vote for. So
00:01:49.320 it was still, you know, a victory for Donald Trump, though, not necessarily in the way that
00:01:54.240 people were looking for or that people, Republicans, particularly, particularly Republicans,
00:01:59.440 that they actually wanted. And I think when we look at the debate with Tim Walls and J.D. Vance,
00:02:03.960 it is exactly the performance that Republicans really wanted J.D. Vance. He has such a knowledge
00:02:09.760 of the facts and he just was really provided a masterclass on how to deliver the facts and how to
00:02:14.520 stay on message. And he appeared really cool, calm and collected throughout the entire evening.
00:02:18.720 And you can even see that in some of the imagery online. You know, when he's not talking, he sees
00:02:23.320 he's standing there. He's standing next to Tim Walls. He looks very relaxed. And that's obviously
00:02:27.480 very difficult to do on a national stage like J.D. Vance was last night where, you know, everyone's
00:02:33.300 watching, everyone's hoping you're going to trip up. Even the slightest look of your face where you
00:02:38.200 might look a little bit dejected for a moment, that's going to be clipped and captured and it's
00:02:42.300 going to live in internet history. And he really just held his ground throughout the entire evening
00:02:46.540 where Tim Walls looked very rattled. He looked quite panicked throughout the evening. You know,
00:02:51.140 there was that funny moment just now in the cold opening when J.D. Vance is talking about Kamala
00:02:55.620 Harris's record with the open border policies and Tim Walls actually appears to be nodding in
00:02:59.760 agreement. Those are just the types of things you really want to avoid in a debate performance
00:03:04.460 with such magnitude as last night was. But, you know, we're going to dive into this. I'm going to
00:03:09.680 play some clips for you guys so you can kind of get a sense of how the evening played out for
00:03:12.600 those of you who don't want to necessarily go and watch the whole thing, but just want to understand
00:03:16.420 what it meant in the context of the U.S. presidential election and, you know, how things
00:03:22.740 might move going forward. And I just want to say, you know, we've covered a lot on this show,
00:03:26.400 Trump's performance. And I think a lot of people are curious as to how this election coverage and
00:03:30.840 how the election is actually going to unfold. And since Trump's performance, and I think yesterday
00:03:35.480 with J.D. Vance really just solidified that, I feel like the momentum is really shifting.
00:03:39.820 I think for a lot, for a lot of this, you know, I do believe it's still going to be a very,
00:03:44.720 a very close election. But I think throughout a lot of the election cycle, your Republicans have
00:03:50.080 kind of been sitting on their hands nervously, not sure where things are going to go and not sure if
00:03:54.100 Trump would be able to pull the win. And I think given how his debate performance is being remembered
00:03:59.520 that we saw the polls didn't move in favor for Kamala after Trump's performance, and now with J.D.
00:04:04.760 Vance coming out with a very strong performance, I think we can kind of see the momentum
00:04:08.420 picking up for the Trump campaign. I think Republicans are breathing a little easier,
00:04:12.320 just seeing how Trump is being remembered and seeing that Kamala and Tim Walls have really
00:04:16.460 not done enough to assure Americans that things will be better under their governments. Not for
00:04:22.420 all Americans. I was just in the States for another Tucker Carlson event. And, you know,
00:04:26.580 you always meet some crazy people who have some crazy ideas. But by and large, I think we're not
00:04:31.920 seeing the polls move. And I think Republicans are breathing a little easier.
00:04:34.560 So right off the hop, J.D. Vance came out, and I think he provided a very optimistic
00:04:39.200 vision for what America would look like under Donald Trump's presidency. And I think when we
00:04:44.500 talk about Trump's debate performance, you know, he really struggled to stay on message. And there
00:04:49.620 were some things about that that was very Trump in nature. And as we've covered so extensively,
00:04:54.340 that debate performance, I think, was remembered in a positive way by a lot of people. But J.D. Vance
00:04:59.280 came out, and he was so strong, and he was so on message from the beginning. Take a little bit
00:05:04.220 look. This is his opening here. Take a look at this clip. And you can just see why he started off
00:05:08.600 so strong. And he kind of delivered the points that a lot of Americans, especially those people
00:05:12.920 at home who are really feeling the pinch of the economy, and they're not feeling safe in their
00:05:17.800 neighborhoods anymore. I think this directly spoke to those people. And I think it did a lot to
00:05:23.460 really reassure them and say, Donald Trump presidency can get America back to the America
00:05:29.340 where we once were, where we want to get back to again. Take a look at this first clip from J.D.
00:05:33.080 Vance here. I want to answer the question. First of all, thanks, Governor. Thanks to CBS for hosting
00:05:37.360 the debate. And thanks, most importantly, to the American people who are watching this evening
00:05:40.620 and caring enough about this country to pay attention to this vice presidential debate.
00:05:44.800 I want to answer the question, but I want to actually give an introduction to myself a little
00:05:47.820 bit because I recognize a lot of Americans don't know who either one of us are. I was raised in a
00:05:52.040 working class family. My mother required food assistance for periods of her life. My grandmother
00:05:56.340 required Social Security help to raise me. And she raised me in part because my own mother 0.62
00:06:01.040 struggled with addiction for a big chunk of my early life. I went to college on the GI Bill after I
00:06:06.520 enlisted in the Marine Corps and served in Iraq. And so I stand here asking to be your vice
00:06:10.960 president with extraordinary gratitude for this country, for the American dream that made it possible
00:06:15.340 for me to live my dreams. And most importantly, I know that a lot of you are worried about the chaos in
00:06:21.120 the world and the feeling that the American dream is unattainable. I want to try to convince you
00:06:25.780 tonight over the next 90 minutes that if we get better leadership in the White House, if we get
00:06:30.420 Donald Trump back in the White House, the American dream is going to be attainable once again.
00:06:34.420 So you see there how he immediately goes for that conversation of people are feeling like the
00:06:38.840 world isn't secure anymore. And that's something that I think is one of the biggest criticisms of the
00:06:43.800 Biden-Harris administration is that the world writ large was a much more peaceful place under Donald
00:06:49.340 Trump. And now here we are on what feels like the brink of World War Three with just the other night
00:06:53.840 Iran dropping bombs on Israel. And a lot of people standing there holding their breath, wondering what
00:06:58.120 is going to happen from here? And is the U.S. particularly going to be pulled into a war in the
00:07:03.500 Middle East? And so I think with that comment, he directly hits at the hearts of concerns with
00:07:09.460 Americans at home, wondering what's going to happen with their military and also what's going to happen
00:07:13.140 with their tax dollars. Of course, America is funding a lot of these wars. And if it is dragged
00:07:17.840 into World War Three, it'll cost the American people a lot of money at a time when they really don't have
00:07:22.500 that money to be giving. And especially when a lot of Americans are thinking and saying to themselves,
00:07:26.720 our government needs to be putting more focus and attention on Americans at home and not in conflicts
00:07:32.120 overseas. So we see him really hit the nail on the head there with that comment. And I think even in his
00:07:36.780 opening comments, when he talks about how his mother struggled with addiction, that brings a
00:07:40.460 really personal moment to his story as well. When he talks about being reliant on government
00:07:45.100 assistant programs growing up, I think that really sort of, you know, assages middle of the road
00:07:50.840 Americans because a lot of conservatives, a lot of Republicans, we don't like government policies.
00:07:55.480 We don't like social security. And here, instead of attacking social security, instead of attacking
00:08:00.840 government programs, J.D. Vance is actually saying, you know, I relied on those programs growing up and
00:08:06.100 that got me through a really difficult period in my life. And so I understand for those of you at home
00:08:10.680 who need these programs, I was in that place before too. And I want to make sure that those are available
00:08:16.100 for you and that your family can get the help that they need, but also so that America becomes a place
00:08:22.360 where maybe one day you won't have to be reliant on those types of programs to keep the lights on at
00:08:27.240 home and to put bread on the table anymore. And so I think that was really strong line from him.
00:08:32.060 And when we also characterize those comments and the way he positioned himself against what
00:08:37.920 we've been told about J.D. Vance for so long and the way that a lot of his comments have been taken
00:08:41.840 out of context. Remember, the number one criticism against J.D. Vance is that he's just someone who's
00:08:46.040 really weird. He doesn't really get it. And I think for anyone who even saw a couple of minutes
00:08:51.560 of his performance last night, you know, you're watching that and you're thinking, oh, wow,
00:08:55.040 like this guy, he does get it, actually. He totally gets it. He's one of us. He didn't have,
00:09:00.180 you know, he's not, he's not a silver spoon baby. He actually had a very difficult childhood
00:09:04.140 and he obviously worked very hard to, to get from a point where he was being raised by his
00:09:09.420 grandmother on government social assistance to a point where he's now been picked as Trump's
00:09:14.420 running mate. This is someone who's worked very hard to get where he is. And he understands what
00:09:18.380 it's like for those of us at home who, who don't really have enough right now, who are, who are
00:09:22.540 struggling. So I think his performance last night was, uh, you know, very strong in the sense that
00:09:27.620 he delivered that message for the American people of what a Trump presidency would look
00:09:31.720 like and that life under Trump would be hopeful and optimistic and safe once again, but also
00:09:36.500 in just counteracting the media narrative that, um, he's weird and that he's out of touch and
00:09:42.740 those type, that type of rhetoric that we've seen with JD Vance. And, you know, the media
00:09:47.480 has done such a successful job, uh, at really pinholing JD Vance into that narrative that we've
00:09:53.920 seen even a lot of polls come out and say that he probably wasn't the best running mate for Trump.
00:09:57.800 And I think he, he really undid a lot of that with his debate performance last night, obviously
00:10:02.560 what the polls say in the test of time, what the election says later on, that'll be the real test
00:10:06.380 to see how his debate performance is remembered and what the impact of it was. But I think it was
00:10:10.920 pretty clear from anyone watching that he didn't let that rhetoric and that narrative that has been
00:10:15.660 created about him. He didn't let that get into his head and he just simply delivered with the
00:10:19.800 information and with the person that he is. Now there, we covered a little bit of what JD Vance
00:10:24.020 looked like being calm, cool and collected, but he was also very strong in fact checking last night.
00:10:29.140 So we had a couple moments in the debate where the moderators, once again, they tried to step in
00:10:34.520 and they tried to fact check JD Vance and he was not having it. He was very easily able to correct
00:10:40.500 them. We're going to play a clip for this now. Take a look at how he handles the media,
00:10:44.460 trying to fact check Tim. Governor. And just to clarify for our viewers, Springfield,
00:10:48.920 Ohio does have a large number of Haitian migrants who have legal status, temporary protected status.
00:10:56.320 Well, Margaret, but thank you. Senator, we have so much to get to.
00:10:59.500 Margaret, I think it's important because the rules were that you guys were going to fact
00:11:05.000 check. And since you're fact checking me, I think it's important to say what's actually going on.
00:11:09.600 So there's an application called the CBP One app where you can go on as an illegal migrant,
00:11:14.560 apply for asylum or apply for parole and be granted legal status at the wave of a Kamala 0.73
00:11:22.140 Harris open border wand. That is not a person coming in, applying for a green card and waiting
00:11:27.120 for 10 years. That is the facilitation of a legal immigration, Margaret, by our own leadership.
00:11:31.760 Thank you, Senator, for describing the legal process.
00:11:33.960 So that clip actually went on for a little longer. And then the moderators were quick
00:11:42.540 to eventually cut his microphones. You know, they did not want him interjecting with with
00:11:47.580 that fact check, though he was able to deliver. And I think we see them there initially when he
00:11:50.960 starts talking and he's saying, well, hold on, you know, you should at least if you're going to
00:11:54.200 fact check me on this, you should at least let me explain what I'm saying. And they're kind of
00:11:59.040 arguing with him back and forth until he says now the rules were that you would not be
00:12:03.340 interrupting the candidates with these fact checks. And that's when you see the moderators
00:12:06.060 kind of take a step back and sort of be like, oh, well, we've been caught red handed, breaking
00:12:09.980 the own rules that we've laid out for the candidates. So I guess we'll let him continue.
00:12:13.780 And then they come in again with that very smug response. Thank you. Thank you, Senator,
00:12:18.240 for for explaining the legal process. You know, just the smugness of it all is really what irks
00:12:23.580 me there. If you've been following J.D. Vance for a while, what he was saying to the
00:12:28.340 moderators is something that he said. He said before, I'm sure he'll say it again. He'll say,
00:12:31.640 sure, you know, Kamala Harris waved her magic wand and she allowed all these Haitian 1.00
00:12:36.720 migrants to come in. And the government, the Biden-Harris administration is saying that it
00:12:41.020 was done under a legal process. But I do not believe that it was constitutional in the way
00:12:45.440 that they allowed all these migrants to come in, because that's not the process that we have for 1.00
00:12:49.480 allowing newcomers into America. And so if Trump was elected, we would simply say that process was
00:12:54.840 not constitutional and that these Haitian migrants are not legal. And he's explained that before. 0.99
00:12:59.340 And that's why he interjected there with that clarification to say that, sure, Kamala Harris
00:13:03.500 might've allowed these migrants to come in, but that's not the process that we have for allowing 0.92
00:13:07.240 newcomers to come in in America. And, you know, the moderators, they weren't a big fan of that.
00:13:12.220 However, if you watch, if you go and watch some of the mainstream media coverage of that,
00:13:15.980 you'll see that even a lot of mainstream media journalists will say, you know,
00:13:19.560 you know, you know, J.D. Vance was actually correct in making that clarification. And you'll see a lot of
00:13:24.560 praise for his performance, even across mainstream media sources. I don't want to spend a ton of time
00:13:29.460 on that today because, well, I think that it speaks to the fact that Tim Walls really did have
00:13:35.400 a very poor performance. If we even have legacy media press coming out and saying that J.D. Vance
00:13:40.900 was strong and won the debate, I think by and large, I just tend to not pay too much mind to them
00:13:45.740 anymore because you never know which way the wind's going to blow with them. And they tend to be typically
00:13:50.700 so biased. So I don't need to spend a ton of time covering what they thought of the debate. They
00:13:54.540 said J.D. Vance won. And I think that's just evidence as to exactly how poor Walls' performance
00:13:58.620 was. But, you know, let's just not give them a lot of credence. I don't know that their opinion
00:14:02.640 matters too much in these things anymore. So we've spent some time talking about how Tim Walls
00:14:07.140 appeared rattled. Let's take a quick look at now how Walls' performance contrasted to J.D. Vance.
00:14:13.260 So first, I want to give you a little bit of an example of an exchange between the two of them.
00:14:18.360 Um, here, um, J.D. Vance is saying that Kamala Harris and Tim Walls are actually going to continue
00:14:24.380 censoring, uh, the American people. And, you know, in this instance, we see J.D. Vance doing what
00:14:30.540 Trump, I think, and, and J.D. Vance need to be very successful at doing in order to see a victory
00:14:35.620 in November, which is painting, which is painting the Democrats as, as radicals. That's why Trump even
00:14:41.300 has that nickname for Kamala Harris, uh, comrade Kamala, because he wants the American people to
00:14:46.520 recognize that she is extremely radicals with her policies and that it will take the American
00:14:51.340 people, you know, into communism essentially is what he's hit is what he's hinting at there with
00:14:55.420 that nickname. And we see J.D. Vance pinhole to most very successfully in that when he talks about
00:15:00.160 censorship, take a look at this next clip. You guys attack us for not believing in democracy.
00:15:05.260 The most sacred right under the United States democracy is the first amendment. You yourself
00:15:10.740 have said there's no first amendment right to misinformation. Kamala Harris wants to use the 1.00
00:15:15.460 power of government and big tech to silence people from speaking their minds. That is a threat to
00:15:20.980 democracy that will long outlive this present political moment. I would like Democrats and
00:15:25.100 Republicans to both reject censorship. Let's persuade one another. Let's argue about ideas and then
00:15:31.260 let's come together afterwards. You can't yell fire in a crowded theater. That's, that's the test.
00:15:36.000 That's the Supreme Court test. Tim, fire in a crowded theater. You guys wanted to kick people
00:15:40.180 off of Facebook for saying that toddlers shouldn't wear a mask. Senator, the governor does have the
00:15:44.200 floor. Fire in a crowded theater. That is criticizing the policies of the government, which is the right
00:15:50.440 of every American. J.D. Vance is essentially, he's portraying a very typically a traditional liberal view
00:15:55.340 of freedom of speech, which is that we should debate each other's ideas and we should seek to win over
00:16:00.120 hearts and minds, not allow people not to speak because we disagree with their ideas. And, and,
00:16:05.840 and Tim Waltz is, you know, his response, I think is very weak. You can't, you can't yell fire. You
00:16:10.040 can't yell fire in a crowded room, but he doesn't really, he's not really dissecting the information
00:16:14.700 that J.D. Vance has given there. He's just sort of giving a bit of a plot of, well, you know,
00:16:17.800 you can't do this. And I think it came off as not a very good moment for, for Tim Waltz.
00:16:23.720 Frustrating in that moment when J.D. Vance wants to get into the specifics and he's saying,
00:16:27.580 well, no, this isn't about yelling fire in a crowded room. You're actually saying that people,
00:16:32.160 you're asking Facebook to censor people who are saying that babies shouldn't wear masks and very
00:16:36.840 frustrating in that moment. You hear the moderators interrupt and they're, they're talking over again.
00:16:40.720 I think there is obviously some criticism to be had for the, once again, the debate format,
00:16:45.440 I find it so frustrating when the moderators are interrupting and to the point where you can't
00:16:49.760 actually hear what the candidates on the stage are saying. But I think that's a bit of a broader
00:16:53.580 discussion about what debate formats used to look like and how they look now and how now it's so much
00:16:57.980 of the moderator where traditionally it was really just two candidates on the, on the stage. And I
00:17:02.320 think, um, when I covered the, the Trump and Harris debate, some of you guys, even in my comments said,
00:17:06.860 you know, we just need to get back to having two candidates on the stage, dialoguing with each
00:17:10.680 other, maybe not even having the moderators there at all, maybe only having a moderator sitting there
00:17:14.800 in case things get out of hand. And I agree that would be a better format. Although I don't know
00:17:18.800 if a candidate like Kamala Harris would really ever agree to a format like that. I don't know if she 0.98
00:17:23.120 would even be capable of debating in such a format. That being said, frustrating moment.
00:17:27.200 I think that JD Vance was really delivering on his points there and saying now censorship is to a
00:17:32.160 point where people can't even discuss COVID policies, which is of course, I think lives in
00:17:36.140 recent memories of one of the worst cases of censorship that any of us have ever seen where
00:17:40.220 I was, and I'm sure you all experienced too. Even now, if I cover anything related to COVID and I post
00:17:46.620 it on Facebook, a lot of times it'll give a warning or on YouTube, it'll give a little note
00:17:50.120 about COVID-19 and where you can go find information and yada yada. It's all, it's all very silly, 0.86
00:17:54.420 but essentially that is the level of censorship that we've seen and is acceptable in most people's
00:17:59.840 minds now that we would be seeing such censorship. And Tim Walz is not really able to explain why that
00:18:05.640 is. He just simply says, well, you know, you can't take things too far, but he's not really
00:18:10.220 willing to say what he believes too far is because we all know it wouldn't be, it wouldn't be very far
00:18:16.180 at all. It'd be simply something like disagreeing with the so-called experts nowadays is considered
00:18:21.440 too far by the radical left. And that's the difference between what, when we talk about
00:18:26.000 traditional liberalism versus wokeism, traditional liberals, that's why we've seen so many of them
00:18:30.740 move like RFK Jr. You know, endorsing Trump is because what liberalism once was is now, you know,
00:18:38.740 they, people who are traditional liberals actually have more in common with conservatives
00:18:42.000 while everyone else seems to be following the leader off of a cliff.
00:18:46.020 All right. And I saved the best debate clip of the night for you all. This is sort of an epic debate
00:18:51.060 meltdown from Tim Walz. This is a bit of a longer clip than I would normally play, but I thought that
00:18:55.900 you would all would, would absolutely enjoy this epic debate meltdown. When Tim Walz is asked about
00:19:02.500 another instance where he was caught in a lie, we know that he seems to have a bit of a lying problem.
00:19:06.740 He lied about his military history and now he lied about being at the TNMM square when they were
00:19:13.100 protesting communism. And he was asked about why he said he was there, even when it seems like he
00:19:17.520 wasn't there. Um, I think this ends with him calling himself a knucklehead. Take a look at this. 0.68
00:19:22.260 Walls. You said you were in Hong Kong during the deadly Tiananmen square protests in the spring of 1989,
00:19:29.260 but Minnesota public radio and other media outlets are reporting that you actually didn't travel to
00:19:34.920 Asia until August of that year. Can you explain that discrepancy?
00:19:40.300 Yeah. Well, and to the folks out there who didn't get at the top of this look, I, uh, I grew up in
00:19:44.820 small rural Nebraska, a town of 400 town that you rode your bike with your buddies till the street
00:19:50.620 lights come on. And I'm proud of that service. I joined the national guard at 17, worked on family
00:19:55.540 farms. And then I use the GI bill to become a teacher passionate about it, a young teacher. Uh, my first
00:20:02.200 year out, I got the opportunity in the summer of 89, uh, to travel to China 35 years ago, be able to do
00:20:07.940 that. I came back home and then started a program to take young people there. We would take basketball
00:20:14.060 teams. We would take baseball teams. We would take dancers and we would go back and forth to China.
00:20:19.040 The issue for that was, was to try and learn. Now, look, my community knows who I am. They saw where I
00:20:24.660 was at. They look, I will be the first to tell you, I have poured my heart into my community. I've tried
00:20:30.680 to do the best I can, but I've not been perfect. And I'm a knucklehead at times, but it's always been
00:20:35.500 about that. Those same people elected me to Congress for 12 years. And in Congress, I was
00:20:41.760 one of the most bipartisan people working on things like farm bills that we got done, working
00:20:45.980 on veterans benefits. And then the people of Minnesota were able to elect me to governor
00:20:50.460 twice. So look, my commitment has been from the beginning to make sure that I'm there for
00:20:55.480 the people to make sure that I get this right. I will say more than anything. Many times I, I will
00:21:01.440 talk a lot. I will get caught up in the rhetoric. But being there, the impact it made, the difference
00:21:07.760 it made in my life, I learned a lot about China. I hear the critiques of this. I would make the case
00:21:12.220 that Donald Trump should have come on one of those trips with us. I guarantee you he wouldn't be
00:21:16.640 praising Xi Jinping about COVID. And I guarantee you he wouldn't start a trade war that he ends up
00:21:22.600 losing. So this is about trying to understand the world. It's about trying to do the best you can for
00:21:28.560 your community. And then it's putting yourself out there and letting your folks understand what it
00:21:32.420 is. My commitment, whether it be through teaching, which I was good at, or whether it was being a good
00:21:37.180 soldier or was being a good member of Congress, those are the things that I think are the values
00:21:41.080 that people care about. Governor, just to follow up on that, the question was, can you explain the
00:21:47.860 discrepancy? All I said on this was, is I got there that summer and misspoke on this. So I will just,
00:21:53.560 that's what I've said. So I was in Hong Kong and China during the democracy protests went in. And
00:22:02.840 from that, I learned a lot of what needed to be in governance. So he essentially spoke for two
00:22:09.560 minutes there without answering the question. I know what it's like to be asked a question
00:22:13.660 that you absolutely have no idea the answer to. And you're like, I really should know the answer to this.
00:22:19.000 That being said, in this case, the question that he didn't know the answer to was something that he
00:22:24.200 had already been caught. There was already media outlets reporting that he had said that he was at
00:22:27.600 Tiananmen Square during the protest and that he wasn't there. So he obviously should have been
00:22:32.160 prepared to have been asked this question. And he seems he's caught totally flat-footed here. He has
00:22:37.280 absolutely no idea what to say. He goes on this two-minute ramble about his whole experience in
00:22:43.200 life growing up, what he's done to get to the point where he's now, yeah, we know about that all.
00:22:47.020 You've already said that, that that's not, this isn't the time for that. This is the time to,
00:22:50.680 you know, be able to sort of explain for this, this essentially this lie that you've said and
00:22:55.220 to be able to flip it in a positive way. But instead, because he, he's asked to be asked about
00:22:59.680 the lie twice. He's, you know, the moderators, they come back with false social story. What's the
00:23:03.020 answer there? He sort of is left with this really awkward moment where he's sort of stumbling over his
00:23:08.700 words. There's long pauses. He's trying to bring a connection there. Maybe if he started off and said,
00:23:12.780 you know, I misspoke and ended and ended his answer with that bit about, well, Trump would
00:23:17.600 have really benefited from these experiences. Then, then his answer could have been remembered
00:23:21.400 in a more positive way, but because he doesn't even address the question from the beginning and
00:23:25.820 the moderators have to come back, that's sort of the lingering impact that you have. And then of
00:23:30.000 course, I think the fact that he calls himself a knucklehead was just pretty brutal. Like it's fun
00:23:35.320 to be a little bit self-deprecating at times. I think it can come across as, as personal. I tend to be
00:23:39.780 quite, uh, quite self-deprecating among my friends and, and, you know, that can be, that can be all
00:23:44.600 in good fun. And I think it can kind of make people feel more relaxed around you. However, I don't know
00:23:49.920 if on this national stage while you're debating was really the appropriate moment for it. Um, you're
00:23:55.220 sort of trying to present yourself to the public as a person who is going to be the best possible pick
00:24:01.180 for the vice president of the most powerful country of the world. And here you are now being asked about
00:24:06.460 a lie where, and you're, you know, being asked to account for a lie that you've said, and you don't
00:24:11.120 answer to it. And instead you tell people how much of a knucklehead you are. So it's, it's really quite 0.99
00:24:15.440 confusing. And Tim Walls, he really tries to lean into his small town folksy roots. And I think he does
00:24:22.700 it successfully at times. I've seen a lot of people commenting on the line and they say, Oh, you know,
00:24:27.060 this, this just seems, he seems like a fun guy. You know, he seems like the type of person that you'd
00:24:31.100 want to go for a beer. So he really does try to lean into these folksy small town roots. And you even see that
00:24:35.880 in the language that he uses. And I think in this instant, it was sort of an example where we all
00:24:40.900 kind of saw through the facade and, you know, he's on stage, he's, he's, he's kind of embarrassing
00:24:45.400 himself. He doesn't know what his answer is. He's just talking and talking and talking and talking
00:24:49.220 and, and with calling himself a knucklehead. So I think it was just a really ineffective.
00:24:53.960 And I think the question we all have to ask ourselves is why wasn't he prepared for this
00:24:57.820 question? It seems like such an obvious question that you were going to be asked. Like you also should
00:25:02.040 have been maybe more, more, even more importantly, he should have been asked why he was lying about
00:25:06.580 his, his military experience. Um, because that's something I think that's even a more important
00:25:10.760 question than, than this instance here. That being said, you know, you know, he did manage to embarrass
00:25:15.780 himself quite significantly in that moment. So certainly hilarious debate moment from him.
00:25:21.400 Uh, I hope to see, you know, more from Tim Walls, more of these hilarious moments. I think,
00:25:25.860 you know, CNN's Jake Tapper, he said later on, well, you know, obviously JD Vance is a little bit more
00:25:30.960 experienced with, with this all, which is interesting when you think about how long
00:25:34.600 Walls is history and politics has been. And the fact that he's quite a bit older than JD Vance,
00:25:39.760 JD Vance is actually by all accounts, less experienced than Tim Walls, but I don't think
00:25:44.220 that Democrats like Kamala Harris and JD Vance, Joe Biden, you know, they're not experienced,
00:25:49.900 um, with dealing with these, you know, and this wasn't even that tough of a question,
00:25:54.240 but they're not experienced dealing with, with any sort of tough questions that challenges them
00:25:58.620 because the media is so easy on them and compared to their Republican counterparts.
00:26:03.100 And obviously during the last debate, we saw the media actually sort of running cover for Kamala.
00:26:07.500 So I think that's why we see him caught off guard there is because even though he has been in
00:26:10.620 politics for so long and by all measures should be very experienced, he doesn't do a lot of media
00:26:15.960 and he certainly isn't challenged by the media that he does agree to interviews with. And ultimately
00:26:21.000 he comes across as, as very unprepared. I think it would have been better if he'd even
00:26:24.520 at points in his career, been willing to do interviews with media that doesn't favor him,
00:26:29.160 that doesn't like him and that he had been challenged to really prepare himself for this
00:26:32.720 moment. But instead he shied away from the tough camera at every opportunity. And during one of the
00:26:37.820 most important nights of his life, he really fumbled that very hard. All right, everyone,
00:26:41.320 that's all we have time for today on Rachel and the Republic. We will be back next week with more
00:26:46.020 election coverage for you guys. I hope that you have a great week. I'll see you soon and God bless.
00:26:54.520 Bye bye.