Juno News - LAWTON： Justin Trudeau's assault on Canadian gun owners

00:00:00.000 Good afternoon Canada welcome to another true north report my name is Andrew

00:00:04.080 Lawton fellow with true north here for another update I didn't actually get the

00:00:09.120 chance to go live last week because I was down with a cold and I could barely

00:00:13.920 talk for five minutes let alone you know 35 minutes so I still have a bit of a

00:00:19.200 cold now so I'm just gonna give you fair warning that if I start like hacking up

00:00:22.760 a lung in the middle of it it's not that the government has tried to silence me

00:00:27.120 and they may well be that the government has tried to silence me but I'm

00:00:29.800 prepared to at least this week if I suddenly lose the ability to speak to

00:00:33.740 blame it on the lingering effects of a cold that as I talk about it right now

00:00:37.860 I might need to cough so in any case thank you very much for in advance your

00:00:42.060 patience I'm wanting to talk about a big issue that has actually come to a bit of

00:00:47.940 a climax in the past week with different stories that ultimately are all part of

00:00:53.000 the same story broadly which is Justin Trudeau's assault on Canadian gun

00:00:58.580 ownership and by extension on Canadian gun owners and this is a big issue it's

00:01:03.680 not just Justin Trudeau it's Justin Trudeau Ralph Goodale Bill Blair this

00:01:09.080 chimera of sorts this three-headed monster that is hell-bent on eliminating gun

00:01:16.380 ownership rights in Canada and the reason I say that with a bit of trepidation is

00:01:22.280 because in Canada we don't really have the right to gun ownership at all and

00:01:26.560 this is something that when I say gun ownership in Canada is a privilege and

00:01:30.660 not a right I'm not seeding left-wing logic here I'm actually acknowledging the

00:01:35.700 law as it stands right now everyone in Canada is legally barred from owning

00:01:40.580 firearms unless you have a permit saying otherwise a possession and acquisition

00:01:45.920 license or a restricted possession and acquisition license now I have one of

00:01:50.280 those millions of other Canadians do but the fact is that that license is a permit

00:01:56.720 to break the law essentially it's a permit to do what otherwise the law says you

00:02:02.520 can't which is own transport possess a firearm and the reason this is so

00:02:09.240 important is because that status quo means that if you were to eliminate all gun laws in

00:02:16.680 Canada guns would be banned if you were to eliminate all of the regulations rather

00:02:21.240 that exist around gun ownership I should be more precise in my language there gun

00:02:26.280 ownership would be banned so as it stands the Conservatives have succeeded in

00:02:31.560 putting when Harper was in power a few different steps in that eased gun ownership it

00:02:37.500 didn't break down the bulk of gun control but it broke down some of the things that were really

00:02:47.260 needless impediments to what gun owners are doing with their firearms without issue on a regular basis

00:02:53.100 and the big thing that happened here is the Liberals completely fear-mongered on it when Justin Trudeau was

00:02:59.940 standing up and fighting back against some of the Harper era reforms he was blatantly lying or

00:03:07.380 alternatively had no idea what he was talking about when it came to the gun laws in Canada for example

00:03:15.540 one of the changes that Harper put into effect was taking this paper authorization to transport that

00:03:21.780 you need to bring your gun from home to a gun range and back and saying we're going to take this att as

00:03:27.860 it's called and make it a part of the license instead of being a separate piece of paper it'll

00:03:32.100 be a part of your firearms license because the eligibility criteria are the same Justin Trudeau

00:03:37.540 said that would mean that anyone could just take a gun and go and shoot up a mall without issue

00:03:42.580 didn't actually need to be true for him to say that and fear-monger about guns and the problem with

00:03:48.900 firearms laws in Canada is that they're only really understood by people who own firearms in Canada

00:03:56.100 so when the Liberals say something about gun ownership it's a minority of people in Canada

00:04:02.100 that know that is not true or know that that's misrepresenting the truth which makes it very

00:04:06.980 difficult to have an honest discussion about it because the vast majority of people in this country

00:04:11.460 are not gun owners and as such do not understand what it is that's being legislated and what it is

00:04:17.620 that's being discussed and this is why it makes it such an important issue because when I say minority

00:04:24.660 rights I'm not talking about the identity politics minority rights we hear about from the Liberals but

00:04:31.460 the rights that are afforded to a group that is statistically a minority and gun owners in Canada

00:04:36.900 are a statistical minority I'm not making a judgment call I'm not talking about this whole diversity

00:04:42.340 as our strength nonsense so gun owners are a minority so anything that is about the rights of gun owners

00:04:49.540 or the privileges afforded to gun owners is by its nature dealing with a minority of the population in

00:04:56.420 Canada which is why the gun lobby needs to be loud it's why the gun lobby needs to speak up and it's

00:05:02.580 why the gun lobby needs to be heard even if the Liberals are hell-bent on eroding the remaining

00:05:08.100 privileges and rights that have been given to gun owners and again I say this I'm completely biased in this

00:05:14.100 I am a gun owner so I have skin in the game on these issues about which I'm speaking right now

00:05:20.100 but I want to go over a couple of the big changes because the reason this is so important is because

00:05:25.860 C-71 which is the massive gun reform bill that the Liberals just passed into law last week was supposed to

00:05:34.340 be the Liberals answer to the Harper easement of gun laws that was what C-71 was supposed to be it was

00:05:41.220 supposed to be about all the things the Liberals were going to do to roll back gun rights and it was

00:05:46.580 this sweeping massive bill that was put into effect about a year and two months ago or sorry introduced

00:05:52.500 into parliament a year and two months ago now just this past week C-71 passed in the senate and the

00:05:59.620 senate was really where gun advocates were focusing all their efforts because the senate where's where the

00:06:05.700 chamber that we're told this uh sober second thought takes place Canadian gun owners hoped would be

00:06:11.140 the place that you could put some common sense into this but what ended up happening and perhaps

00:06:16.980 unsurprising is the independent senators group which is basically the group of senators who were all

00:06:24.260 appointed by Liberals but call themselves independent all voted as a bloc to pass C-71 not just to pass the

00:06:32.500 government gun reform bill but to pass it and to kibosh amendments put forward by conservative senator Don

00:06:40.500 pletsch so they basically rolled back any of the little things that were done to try to improve

00:06:46.260 it and make it more effective meaning the independent senators proved that they are not independent at

00:06:51.620 all but they're entirely dependent on liberal rationale and liberal vote whipping but i want to go over what

00:06:59.060 some of the changes were that were in C-71 because i i want to stress here that this is not a bill that does

00:07:06.980 anything to improve public safety despite what the gun control activists are saying that this is a long

00:07:13.620 overdue bill and it doesn't go far enough but it's a good step it actually doesn't do anything as far as

00:07:19.860 public safety is concerned nor does it do anything to keep guns out of the hands of people that shouldn't

00:07:25.060 have them so one of the big things that i really take issue with when you apply for a possession and

00:07:30.900 acquisition license in canada or a restricted possession and acquisition license you have to go

00:07:36.340 through a background check you also have to go through a questionnaire that asks you about things

00:07:43.140 like bankruptcy job loss divorce and mental health history and specifically it looks at a relevant period

00:07:51.860 of within the last five years on on most of those things not all but on most of them it's looking at

00:07:56.900 your life in the last five years for example i've been very open and candid in my life i've dealt with

00:08:02.980 mental health issues when i applied for my gun license it was within the last five years that i

00:08:07.780 had had those issues so i had to be transparent about it and go to police and say yes this is what

00:08:13.300 happened here's a letter of explanation now in my case it didn't disqualify me from having a gun license

00:08:19.540 what it meant is that they did extra scrutiny they wanted to interview family members of mine they

00:08:23.780 wanted to do their due diligence and i say the process worked that the process worked because

00:08:28.820 the police and the chief firearms office made an adjudication of my situation and said yes

00:08:34.260 he's not a menace to canadian society hold your jokes back so now what they're doing is trying to

00:08:41.540 not doing they're succeeding in actually making it so that instead of looking at the last five years of

00:08:48.180 your life the background check and this scrutiny will go to the entirety of your life now i want to

00:08:56.020 to make a point here about why this matters if you're a 65 year old who's applying for a gun license

00:09:02.820 your life when you were 18 when you were 22 is now going to be part of it so we're looking at

00:09:08.900 screening that will now go back 40 plus years 40 plus years and we're not just talking about you know if

00:09:15.620 you had a violent uh murder conviction 40 years ago we're talking about things in your life personal

00:09:21.540 details in your life that have no bearing whatsoever on where you are now and on firearms ownership now

00:09:29.860 and all of a sudden we've given the government license to take that all into consideration here

00:09:35.620 now this doesn't mean that things that come up will be automatic disqualifiers but it means that now

00:09:41.300 government databases have much more of your information at hand and more importantly there

00:09:46.500 are many more criteria that can be used to go after gun ownership and again we go back to the

00:09:52.580 fundamental axiom here which is that the law does not view gun ownership as a right therefore you do

00:09:58.660 not have a right to complain about all this you can't say well hang on this violates my rights because

00:10:03.860 you don't have any when you are asking for a gun or license to own a gun in canada you are already

00:10:10.420 saying to the government i'm surrendering my rights and one of the key examples of this

00:10:14.740 is that the chief firearms office or local police departments can right now without a warrant come

00:10:20.580 into my home and do an inspection to make sure that i'm following the storage laws that's one of the

00:10:26.660 things you agree to by owning guns in canada another example the chief firearms office is doing daily

00:10:33.540 background checks to make sure that my situation in the eyes of the law has not changed this is not

00:10:38.900 something that is done on regular non-gun owning citizens in canada but when you are a gun owner

00:10:46.180 this is all part and parcel of what the state can do because you've signed these rights away

00:10:52.260 now i want to make something very clear here i'm i'm not doing this to say oh woe is me gun owners are

00:10:57.060 so hard done by what i'm doing is is stressing how stringent and strict the regulations already

00:11:04.020 are about gun ownership to illustrate why it's so ridiculous to put more barriers and more impediments

00:11:11.300 and more obstacles for these people knowing that they're not the ones causing the problems

00:11:16.900 toronto last year had a record-breaking year for gun homicide it outpaced what happened in 2008 which

00:11:23.300 was called the year of the gun the culprits of these were not the people like me that are subject

00:11:28.980 to warrantless searches that have had the vetting by the rcmp that have the daily background checks

00:11:34.100 we are not the problem excuse me that's what i was talking about at the beginning apologize i know

00:11:41.380 it sounds terrible so this is one of the big things that c71 does your entire life history is now

00:11:48.980 subject to scrutiny when you're applying for a license beyond the five years now remember i have not

00:11:54.420 heard of a single case in canada and i'm saying this point blank i've not heard of a single case in

00:11:59.860 canada where someone's history who was a law-abiding gun owner prior to five years would have prevented

00:12:06.900 something from happening i've not known of anyone where a law-abiding gun owner was given a gun license

00:12:12.180 but if the permit period that was under scrutiny had been extended to seven years 10 years 20 years

00:12:19.060 they wouldn't have been granted one making this an effort that only seeks to detract from rights

00:12:25.220 rather than enhance public safety one of the other issues is the reversal of the authorization of

00:12:33.140 transport restrictions that stephen harper eased meaning the automatic att the thing that says if you

00:12:39.620 have a restricted gun it's licensed it's registered you can just with your license alone drive to the

00:12:45.780 gunsmith or to the gun range or wherever the case may be the liberals are changing that so if i have

00:12:53.060 let's say a mechanical issue with my firearm and i need to take it to the gunsmith i need to go to the

00:12:59.380 government to effectively get permission for it i need a piece of paper that says you are hereby

00:13:04.900 authorized we've given you permission to do this but now again you're talking about bureaucracy which

00:13:10.580 comes with a price tag to do something that i am lawfully entitled to do when again there has never

00:13:17.140 been a mass murder or a homicide in canada that used a firearm where a criminal has used an att

00:13:25.060 it's a piece of paper if i want to take my gun go somewhere and commit a crime i'm not going to log

00:13:31.460 my flight plan if you will with the rcmp so we're talking about a make work project all part of c71 which

00:13:39.380 the independent senators decided to give a rubber stamp instead of putting a check and balance in

00:13:45.460 place to say okay this doesn't make sense this doesn't enhance or impact public safety this is

00:13:51.300 just liberal hackery so these are a couple of the key issues here now now these are not insignificant

00:13:59.060 pieces of legislation they're not they're very relevant they're very very uh relevant for gun owners

00:14:06.660 because these are bureaucratic but the reason i think this is so important is because the liberals

00:14:12.580 are not interested in saying this is what we think a gun ownership regime in canada is supposed to look

00:14:19.060 like this is a very important point here the liberals don't have their vision of you know we don't like

00:14:26.260 this harper thing uh you know we want gun ownership to look like this and and whatever this is they

00:14:31.860 don't have that model no their interest is in rolling back access as much as they can politically

00:14:40.180 until it's going to cost them and then they they stop they're interested in gaining ground

00:14:46.100 not in actually creating a vision for this thing that in canada and not that i would agree with that

00:14:53.700 vision but at least we'd see the end point and if the liberals were in good faith saying look uh you know

00:14:59.620 the the licensing permit that's all fine uh we've got some issues with the classification system

00:15:04.740 okay maybe we disagree but we have that discussion or if they say well you know the authorization to

00:15:10.420 transport issue this is a sticking point for us no they're actually trying to do as much as they can and

00:15:16.180 and i have proof of this because when c71 was passed this was a broad bill this was a very broad bill

00:15:25.140 they put a lot of things in it and this was their their massive gun reform package and then what

00:15:30.820 happened the danforth avenue shooting the danforth out shooting happened after c71 was introduced and

00:15:38.340 already working its way through the parliamentary process and the reason that's important is because c71

00:15:47.060 would have done a gun ban if the liberals had been interested in doing a gun ban it would have

00:15:52.500 restricted handguns if the liberals were interested in restricting handguns it would have done all

00:15:57.060 of this if the liberals wanted to and planned to do it but it didn't until the danforth out shooting

00:16:04.180 gave the liberals political cover that was what happened it gave them political cover so they could

00:16:10.580 start putting all of these things in place that they've always wanted to but never had the political willpower to do

00:16:16.740 and this is why canadian gun owners should be very concerned right now because all bets are off they're

00:16:24.100 able to do pretty much anything they want because there's a backdrop of gun violence stories between

00:16:31.460 what happened on danforth and what happened in christchurch again apologies and the christchurch shooting

00:16:39.700 again nothing to do with canada nothing to do with canadian gun laws nothing to do with a canadian story

00:16:46.740 but ralph goodale says point blank that may factor into the decisions that are being made

00:16:53.060 by the government in canada and i did a video i think it was last week or two weeks ago where i played

00:16:59.780 a clip from bill blair talking with evan solomon on ctv and bill blair said very candidly he's not taking

00:17:07.300 anything off the table specifically in reference to whether he would use an order in council which is a cabinet

00:17:14.020 directive that does not go through parliament that is not voted on whether he would use an order in

00:17:19.220 council to ban certain types of firearms we still know that the government is mauling a handgun ban

00:17:26.100 and there's also risk that government is going to do a ban on what's called the ar-15 now i want to talk

00:17:32.740 about the ar-15 for a couple of moments here because it's one of the most misunderstood and i would say

00:17:38.740 falsely maligned guns that exist in canada you know the reason i say this is tremendously significant

00:17:48.500 here is because the ar-15 if i were to ask you now don't chime in if you're a gun owner but if i were

00:17:54.660 to ask you as a non-gunner what what does the ar stand for what does the ar stand for an ar-15 most

00:18:01.060 people think it means assault rifle it doesn't it means armalite rifle which is a type of which

00:18:06.740 it's a manufacturing style and the ar-15 is not one gun it's a platform of gun there are many

00:18:13.060 different ar-15s that exist that are made by different manufacturers from colt to smith and

00:18:18.980 wesson to naranco you can get an ar-15 style gun and it's a very popular style of gun because they look

00:18:25.940 cool they're fun to shoot they're lightweight and they're very versatile so people who are handy like

00:18:31.060 them because they can upgrade them you can swap out pieces you can actually get your hands dirty

00:18:36.500 by dismantling them and upgrading them and growing them an ar-15 has the same rate of fire

00:18:43.780 and the same round of ammunition that it fires as many non-restricted guns uh guns that do not

00:18:52.580 require the special license that an ar-15 requires like a mini 14 for example and you can actually make

00:18:59.140 a mini 14 look almost identical to an ar-15 they fire the same round of ammunition the same distance

00:19:05.940 they're both just as concealable or non-concealable one's non-restricted and one's restricted and the

00:19:11.940 reason this is relevant is because the ar-15 has become the focal point of gun grabbers for no reason

00:19:19.140 other than it's been used in mass shootings the reason it's used in mass shootings is not because

00:19:24.420 it's a more violent gun than other types of guns the reason it's been used in mass shootings is because

00:19:29.860 it's popular it would be no different than saying that honda civics are used in more car crashes

00:19:35.060 than maseratis well because the honda civics a more popular car you're going to see it in more

00:19:40.020 incidents just as a matter of statistics but let me tell you ar-15s right now in canada are flying off

00:19:48.500 of store shelves ar-15s are flying off of shells companies cannot keep them in stock because gun owners

00:19:55.460 are terrified and i would say justifiably so that there's a change that's going to come and make

00:20:01.620 these prohibited meaning that you'll only be able to have one if you have it before the prohibition

00:20:07.140 goes into effect and by the way i'm in this group of people that bought one last week just because i

00:20:13.380 want to make sure that if this gets banned i am able to keep it it's a big gamble a lot of canadians

00:20:21.220 are making this gamble because they don't trust bill blair to govern the firearms regime in canada

00:20:27.060 with actual sense they do not trust the government and nor should they no one should trust the

00:20:34.740 government right now because the government has been doing this in bad faith and here's what i say

00:20:38.740 why i would not have supported an ar-15 ban or a handgun ban being put through the legislature as part

00:20:46.820 of c71. it's bad policy and it's bad politics but i would have more respect for at least a process that

00:20:54.180 goes through the parliamentary channels than the order in council that bill blair is mulling now

00:21:01.300 and this order in council serves no other purpose than to subvert the democratic process now the good

00:21:08.100 news is that if there's a change in government something that can be done by cabinet by the stroke

00:21:13.380 of a pen can also be undone by cabinet by the stroke of a pen but there's a big if there number one there

00:21:18.500 needs to be a change in government and though there is an election coming up in october there's no guarantee

00:21:23.700 the conservatives will win andrew shear has said that he will if elected prime minister undo c71

00:21:31.780 but the problem with ar-15s and handguns is that it's very difficult given how much misinformation

00:21:38.340 exists about these guns to have a politician do anything about them if just just think of this

00:21:43.780 if andrew shear were to be the prime minister right now and we're to say we're making it so

00:21:47.860 the canadians can go back to owning ar-15s the media is going to hang on his shoulder everyone who's

00:21:55.140 ever been killed by an ar-15 they're going to make him the perpetrator of the sandy hook shooting

00:22:01.940 this is exactly what's going to happen because the media does not understand or does not want to

00:22:06.580 understand guns you know i once saw a news story this is a completely minor point but i feel the

00:22:12.100 need to share it anyway i saw a news story that was talking about a firearm seizure that had taken place

00:22:18.260 and someone was accused of uh or the police were said were said to have taken from someone they arrested

00:22:25.940 a bolt action semi-automatic gun now if you're a gun owner you're scratching your head right now wondering

00:22:31.780 what on earth a bolt action semi-automatic gun is if you're not a gun owner you might not know

00:22:36.660 that that is impossible bolt action is not semi-automatic semi-automatic is not bolt action

00:22:42.100 something cannot be both but what had happened in this case is police had sent out a press release

00:22:47.940 and they had made a mistake in what they called the firearm and the person who wrote the story had no

00:22:53.460 idea because most people in media in canada have never held a gun in their life let alone owned one so they

00:22:59.620 just copy and paste it and assume that it's valid and i would love to see a lot more literacy

00:23:06.180 about firearms because so many of the issues here so many of the issues in canadian understanding could

00:23:13.380 be dealt with if canadians had a bit more exposure to it you've got two groups of people you've got

00:23:20.020 those who are malicious and hate guns and hate gun owners and you also have uh the other side of this

00:23:26.020 which is people that genuinely have just never been around it before and the uh canadian shooting

00:23:32.020 sports association and the canadian coalition for firearms rights now i'm a member of both

00:23:37.220 organizations so i want to disclose that but both of them have done great work at actually inviting

00:23:43.380 politicians out to the gun range and some of them have taken them up on this offer i don't know how

00:23:48.740 many non-conservatives versus conservatives i know conservatives right now are about the only allies

00:23:54.420 that gun owners have conservatives and and the people's party of canada uh but the conservatives

00:23:59.300 have done a lot more on this historically because when stephen harper was in power uh the conservatives

00:24:04.500 were being quite friendly to gun owners so right now you have bill blair who instead of facing voters

00:24:13.540 and putting any gun laws in legislation is waiting until the 11th hour potentially to put it in an order

00:24:20.900 in council now if the liberals are hell-bent on eroding firearm owning rights and freedoms in

00:24:26.660 canada the position that i've made is they have to go to the voters and say it in the election and they

00:24:32.180 have to get a mandate to do it now that doesn't deal with my issues with such legislation but at least

00:24:38.100 it or it removes the lack of transparency component of it and that i think is significant now jim writes

00:24:45.380 on well jordan writes on facebook c71 is a bad bill period i agree uh very much jordan i'm of the same

00:24:51.140 mind on that jim writes canadians don't know what it's like to have your rights taken away but they

00:24:56.260 will know this is the tip of the iceberg you know i think that's an important point here because i

00:25:02.580 mentioned earlier in this stream that gun owners are a minority group in canada statistically it's not a

00:25:08.900 tiny group i mean we're talking about millions of legally owned guns in canada but it still is a

00:25:14.020 minority of the population that is impacted by changes to gun laws and if people turn a blind eye

00:25:22.020 because oh well i'm not a gun owner it's not my problem you are giving government license to make

00:25:27.620 other legislative changes or uh super legislative changes that impact you down the road because you

00:25:34.900 didn't speak up now and i'm not gonna you know torture that uh martin nemoeller poem of first they came

00:25:40.740 for the and i didn't speak because that's not about gun owners that's about something far more

00:25:44.740 significant but there is something to that idea of you need to look out when government is undemocratically

00:25:52.660 taking away someone else's rights because it could just as easily be yours down the road once that

00:25:58.340 becomes the standard and once that becomes the precedent so i do think people need to pay attention there

00:26:04.340 and also look at the inventory issues right now the fact that gun stores across canada cannot keep

00:26:11.220 certain handguns on the shelves cannot keep ar-15s on the shelf says that there is a contingent

00:26:17.060 of gun owners in canada a sizable contingent that is not prepared to take this lying down

00:26:23.140 so bill blair whose job is to apparently take guns off the street has actually done more

00:26:28.100 to put guns into the civilian market than he's done to take them out of it because bill blair's

00:26:34.260 fear-mongering has caused people to you know like the charlton heston thing uh you know make sure that

00:26:40.100 the government will only get them from their cold dead hands because one of the other issues with c71

00:26:46.100 is basically the liberals trying to secretly bring back a gun registry and the long gun registry one of the

00:26:52.740 most colossally failed programs in canadian history when it comes to policing and justice it was the

00:27:00.180 program that if you were to have a non-restricted gun like a hunting rifle or a shotgun or even a musket

00:27:08.420 you had to register it it cost billions of dollars did nothing for public safety the conservatives thank

00:27:13.460 goodness got rid of it when stephen harper was in office but the current infrastructure now the liberals

00:27:19.780 keep saying we're not bringing back the gun registry we're not bringing it back but one of the things

00:27:24.180 that c71 does is makes it a requirement that a gun stores log the serial number make model license number

00:27:33.460 name address of anyone who buys a non-restricted gun so this means now by the way a lot of gun stores do

00:27:41.620 this for their own records but now the government is compelling it there is a record that government is

00:27:47.780 aware of of where every gun is going to be in canada that is sold from the implementation date of this

00:27:54.580 until this is repeal which means that there is de facto a registry now the only difference is it's not

00:28:00.420 a centralized registry but it means that government is going to at a certain point if a gun is used in a

00:28:06.020 crime try to subpoena this record and boom all of a sudden we've got a gun registry that is of access

00:28:13.940 to the government and of use to the government so these are why these issues are significant and why

00:28:19.620 gun owners need to step up and do it and look i'm doing this because i believe in it and because it

00:28:25.220 impacts me but i'm trying to bridge this gap between gun owners who are aware of these issues and even

00:28:31.860 non-gun owners you may not personally have seen in the game but we're talking about due process we're

00:28:36.740 talking about rights and more importantly we're talking about ineffectual inept legislation

00:28:42.020 that is being done under this guise of public safety but actually has no public safety benefit

00:28:48.660 the only people impacted by these are those with a willingness to follow the law as it is

00:28:55.460 i don't want a criminal record i don't want guns seized i don't want to break the law i am a law

00:29:00.820 abiding person that's in my nature that's in my dna so i'm going to follow all these rules begrudgingly but

00:29:06.260 i'll follow them i will follow them the criminals that are causing the gun issues in canada that are

00:29:12.660 causing the gun homicides that don't have legal guns that don't have registered guns that don't

00:29:17.220 have licenses they're not going to follow them this is not rocket science and i know i shouldn't be

00:29:22.500 expecting rocket science from government right now but the people that are impacted by this are the ones

00:29:28.100 like me not the ones that are actually committing the crimes so bill blair is going to continue to

00:29:33.540 try to push that boundary as much as he feels he can get away with politically which is why we need

00:29:39.540 to look to the government and defiantly and clearly say stop right now and that's one of the things true

00:29:46.020 north is doing that's one of the things i'm doing i will say we can't do this alone as a media outlet that

00:29:51.620 is actually aware of firearms laws and promoting them from a perspective of law-abiding gun ownership

00:29:58.020 we do need your support we are a grassroots organization if you head on over to tnc.news

00:30:03.940 and you can chip in a couple of dollars to our efforts it's tax deductible we very much appreciate

00:30:08.820 it and you can also join the heritage club the andrew lawton heritage club specifically for about ten

00:30:14.100 dollars a month you get some great bonuses and you can support the work that we're doing so that's my

00:30:18.820 pitch hope you all have a great rest of the week thank you for dealing with my raspiness

00:30:22.740 and thanks for listening we'll talk to you next week canada thank you god bless and good day

Juno News - May 31, 2019

LAWTON： Justin Trudeau's assault on Canadian gun owners

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript