00:00:00.000This is now day five of the Public Order Emergency Commission. I did a bit of an experiment on
00:00:05.740yesterday's show and I spent the entire program talking about what had been happening in the first
00:00:10.880several days, playing some of the key clips and highlights. I'm going to do a little bit of that
00:00:15.300today but I'm also going to take a lot of the bigger picture view. Tom Marazzo, who has been
00:00:21.320on this show before, he was quoted in my book. He was a Freedom Convoy volunteer, big logistics guy.
00:00:28.320He'll be on in just about 12 minutes time to talk about the negotiations taking place
00:00:33.160behind the scenes between convoy organizers and the City of Ottawa. Negotiations that are quite critical
00:00:39.960to this idea of whether or not the Emergencies Act was justified. We have heard a lot of testimony
00:00:47.280to this point. In fact, it's just after four o'clock right now and since 9 45 this morning with a couple
00:00:53.580of breaks there notwithstanding, former Ottawa Police Services Board Chair Diane Deans has been
00:00:59.720testifying, talking about all of these calls that she was putting and the police service was putting
00:01:04.760to get more resources, more officers, calls that effectively went ignored. And I want to play just
00:01:12.120a couple of the highlights that have come out from Diane Deans' testimony so far. One of them I found
00:01:17.980kind of interesting here and I want to pull up the clip, it's actually two clips because she was,
00:01:24.040it seemed like surprised that the police service didn't want to give her, a city councillor who's
00:01:30.820responsible for basically the ways and means of policing, keeping the lights on at Ottawa Police
00:01:35.980headquarters, surprised they didn't want to give her like the detailed breakdown of what their tactical
00:01:42.020plans were to go after convoy protesters. This was an exchange from just about an hour and a half ago.
00:01:50.360In your witness statement you say that when you requested to see the plan you would receive
00:01:55.860wiggle words. Can you explain what you mean by that? Well I think just what I've been describing
00:02:02.400here this morning that we'd see parts of a plan, we'd hear little bits about, you know, there's going
00:02:09.260to be some form of an operation but, you know, I recall at one point Chief slowly telling me that
00:02:15.980he couldn't share the details because, you know, it obviously the element of surprise is important
00:02:21.920in this operation. We heard a lot of evidence this morning about the plan. So you testified that there
00:02:30.340is always some tension between the police and the police services board about the sharing of
00:02:37.040operational planning details, right? Right. And we spoke before the break about the sensitivity
00:02:45.840of intelligence information and I suggest to you that there are very similar sensitivities
00:02:52.720involved in sharing operational information. Yep.
00:02:58.440The information of police operations is considered highly confidential for safety reasons. Right.
00:03:04.740Including the safety of officers. Right. And as chief of police, the safety of officers would be of the utmost importance, right?
00:03:14.900Of course. And like in the case of intelligence reports, it was not the practice of the board to demand operational planning information prior to the convoy, right?
00:03:30.540I don't think we demanded operational planning information. I think we, you know, inquired about operational issues in accordance with what we understood that limit to be under the act.
00:03:52.280Fair. So prior to the convoy, you wanted some high-level operational information, but you weren't asking for tactical plans, for example.
00:04:05.240So it was a bit of an odd exchange in some regards because we had on one hand, the police services board saying she wanted more information.
00:04:15.560She seemed a little bit perturbed. She wasn't getting that, but also an admission that no, the police services board who are bureaucrats and counselors would never have access to just that minutiae of where the police are going to position and all of this other stuff.
00:04:32.580So I think that there's a bit of a weird dynamic taking place now.
00:04:36.860This is a woman who, when the convoy was underway, accused them of being terrorist.
00:04:42.280She said that, I can't remember if it was during a meeting or in an interview, but called the convoy protesters terrorists.
00:04:48.300Yet oddly, Diane Dean was actually like treated as an asset by convoy leaders and convoy organizers.
00:04:55.700They were being very nice to her. Brendan Miller, who's been the lead lawyer representing the Freedom Convoy, was thanking her for her service on the police services board, was complimenting her.
00:05:30.980It's a team's meeting between her and Jim Watson.
00:05:33.720And it's about her decision to appoint an interim chief to replace Steve Bell, when there was this point at which Ottawa had like three police chiefs in the matter of 24 hours.
00:05:43.740And Jim Watson was expressing his dislike of that decision.
00:05:47.840And the police service lawyer was really going after Diane Deans for recording this.
00:05:52.940And it was kind of an odd dynamic about, you know, like nothing to do with the Emergencies Act, nothing to do with horses trampling over an Indigenous woman,
00:06:03.320nothing to do with the suspension of civil liberties, nothing to do with anything except perhaps a little bit of palace intrigue at Ottawa City Hall.
00:06:11.120Not that intrigue and Ottawa municipal politics have ever been used in the same sentence before.
00:06:17.600I want to play another clip for you here.
00:06:20.740And this is a bit of an interesting one that came about today in which Diane Deans accused Jim Watson of using the convoy to score political points.
00:06:30.160And I should say, this is perhaps why the convoy lawyer might have thought that she was a better ally as far as legal strategy is concerned compared to Jim Watson.
00:07:03.600And they got ahead of that story and characterized it as something quite different than it was intended to be.
00:07:11.220You felt they were playing a bit of politics with you in the midst of this crisis in the city?
00:07:14.980Yeah, I guess, I guess to a certain extent, that old maxim about never wasting a good crisis, it also presents an opportunity to settle some old scores.
00:07:27.500And I guess that's the way I viewed that.
00:07:31.780Accusing Mayor Jim Watson of using the convoy for political gain to force her out of her role as police services board chair and so on.
00:07:40.880But I want to get outside of the municipal politics here for a moment because one of the big revelations that came wasn't even through testimony necessarily, but through documents.
00:07:52.040You can head to the Public Order Emergency Commission website right now and you can find the documents that have been uploaded as exhibits.
00:08:55.700And the CSIS director, David Vigneault, says there are no foreign actors identified at this point supporting or financing this convoy.
00:09:04.680Now, obviously, a few days after that, there would be the leak of donors to Give, Send, Go.
00:09:10.500And people would find that, yes, there were some donors from there that were from the United States or from the United Kingdom or from, I don't know, Swatiland or something.
00:09:40.680It was downstream of the organic momentum and organic support that the convoy had.
00:09:45.960And that part is so critical here because there's a difference between some guy sitting in the Kremlin putting this huge chunk of change towards this protest movement
00:09:55.520and an organic movement that people around the world say, you know what, I like the cut of those truckers' jibs.
00:10:18.180And that's so key because if you go back to those criteria to invoke the Emergencies Act that we were talking about at a fairly granular level yesterday,
00:10:39.900It's not even this huge, giant leap to say, yes, there was no foreign funding because everyone knew that except for the liberals.
00:10:47.160But I think it's important that we acknowledge this is now in the record.
00:10:51.120And there's going to be a lot of narrative busting that takes place over the next six weeks
00:10:55.880as we hear live testimony in real time from so many people that are connected to this at various levels.
00:11:02.020And even people that certainly aren't on the convoy side have been giving evidence and giving testimony
00:11:06.840that is fairly supportive of the convoy narrative, which is that this was a peaceful, perhaps disruptive, yes, but a peaceful protest.
00:11:15.720And remember, the federal government has to be able to prove that there were no other means available to them under law to deal with this problem.
00:11:25.320If, by the way, if a national emergency even existed, which I highly doubt it did.