ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- July 01, 2022
Legacy media continues to spread misinformation about Freedom movement
Episode Stats
Length
31 minutes
Words per Minute
190.46803
Word Count
5,928
Sentence Count
1
Misogynist Sentences
4
Hate Speech Sentences
4
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
hello everyone and welcome along to another spectacular edition i hope anyway of fake
00:00:16.080
news friday andrew lawton in for candace malcolm your rightful host who i promise will return to
00:00:22.440
this chair at some moment just not in this show anyway unless she does like the kool-aid man and
00:00:27.840
just barges in going oh yeah at some point midway through which you know what would make for good
00:00:32.580
television but to keep some semblance of continuity we do have our trusty co-host harrison faulkner
00:00:38.600
with us as always host of the true north show ratio to harrison good to have you here thanks
00:00:43.400
very much good to see you andrew good to see that you're uh filling in for candace while she's away
00:00:48.220
and uh hopefully it's hopefully the the show keeps on rolling that's a big big expectation for me in
00:00:55.420
the summer and i like that i said it was good to have you here as though i'm not the one that's
00:00:58.560
just like barged in unannounced to uh to guest co-host uh over the course of the next little
00:01:03.220
while and i will say i mean just in the spirit of fake news the fakest news of all is that this is
00:01:09.520
canada day because as many of you know if you've been long time subscribers to true north and you've
00:01:14.060
heard my annual rant about this it's actually dominion day it's not canada day it shouldn't
00:01:19.280
be canada day so i proudly say to you all if you say happy canada day it's fake news uh blessed
00:01:24.960
dominion day to all of you and you too harrison so you're too young for dominion day but hopefully
00:01:29.420
we can bring it back and make it uh make it cool again if uh it was ever cool i think it was cool
00:01:34.460
uh we got lots of stuff happening though i mean right now on parliament hill we know that a lot of
00:01:39.020
festivities are going on and surely we'll have lots of fake news to break down about that next week
00:01:44.160
because we know that the media has just been relentless since the convoy originally in january
00:01:50.540
of this year at mischaracterizing all of these people that are supporting freedom movement
00:01:56.620
supporting the convoy we saw it with the arrest of tamara leach this week we saw it with the convoy
00:02:01.740
we've seen it in the lead up to the canada day dominion day excuse me festivities this week and even
00:02:09.720
now just looking at the way conservative leader candace bergen has been treated for this little exchange
00:02:16.140
she had on evan solomon's show on ctv just in the last week over 20 members of your party met
00:02:23.080
with two one person james top who was not part of the trucker convoy i've spoken to him he's a
00:02:28.860
veteran he's marched across canada about mandates but he they also met with a guy named tom marazzo
00:02:33.640
who was a spokesperson um also a veteran by the way who i've spoken to um this is a guy that stood in a
00:02:40.780
press conference during the convoy and said he'd like to work in a coalition with your part party
00:02:45.940
the bloc the nbp to try to form a government what does it tell canadians that someone like you were
00:02:50.660
with the truckers who took pictures many of your members and now here we are 20 members almost 20
00:02:56.300
percent of your caucus is out there essentially saying as one member said we're allies you have
00:03:02.260
their support what does that tell you we very much support canadians who are were and still are
00:03:08.720
against the mandatory vaccines we don't believe that they should be wedged called names stigmatized
00:03:14.520
we don't think they should be set aside our job is to listen to canadians we don't always have to
00:03:20.400
agree even with what they're talking about we don't agree with everything that they want to do
00:03:24.640
obviously credibility to people who are who are holding press conferences that are that that are trying
00:03:30.220
to say we we want to form a government that would not be democratically elected evan these these
00:03:35.160
people obviously did not understand that i don't think any sedition charges were laid were they
00:03:39.620
were were no where they they were not but it doesn't have to be but there are lots of charges
00:03:44.640
laid against some of the some of the but i think i think this is the legislation this is the
00:03:48.760
misinformation that what's misinformation the people who protested here in ottawa were there were as you
00:03:56.300
know hundreds and thousands of them they were upset they wanted to be heard and we as conservatives
00:04:02.340
believe that they deserve to be heard so what she's done there is taken a very strong position
00:04:07.640
one that we wish aaron o'toole had done in january to say that yes conservative members of parliament
00:04:13.000
and all members of parliament should be listening to the people they represent absolutely it was right
00:04:18.060
for them to meet with james top and they can do whatever they want as far as attending these events
00:04:23.060
and not attending the events whatever harrison i mean first off before we get to the media reaction
00:04:28.240
where was this conservative leadership in the last election i know i mean it just felt in the last
00:04:34.720
election andrew that every time there was an opportunity for a conservative leader for a
00:04:39.960
conservative politician to stand up and and defend canadians who are rightfully upset who have
00:04:45.600
real grievances with the government they would just fold and then of course as you said as you say
00:04:51.040
at the beginning of the convoy protest aaron o'toole was completely unwilling to stand up for
00:04:58.000
canadians who many of them were looking for a leader many of them were probably not partisan were not
00:05:03.700
necessarily political not not wedded to one party or another but yet the conservatives didn't seem to
00:05:09.480
see seize that opportunity to take the chance to grab new support by just saying you know what we
00:05:15.240
actually stand with you we respect the issue that we respect your concerns and understand
00:05:20.400
your your frustrations and finally it feels as though with candace bergen being the leader that
00:05:26.420
there has been this sort of you know this sort of kick into high gear from the conservatives to say no
00:05:32.260
we're done kind of tiptoeing around this we're going to firmly stand on the side of freedom we're going
00:05:39.800
to firmly stand on the side of canadians who just have some legitimate concerns and i mean we're at
00:05:46.000
a point now andrew where it's refreshing to hear a conservative leader a canadian politician say that
00:05:51.660
canadians have a right to protest the government what how have we gone to this point it's just incredible
00:05:58.380
yeah it is and i mean i i will say i've always had a lot of appreciation for evan solomon i don't agree
00:06:05.900
with everything he says all the time nor would i with anyone else but i think he's very fair and and
00:06:10.860
i think that you know he's playing devil's advocate in this context but a lot of the people that are
00:06:15.280
watching that really agree with what he's saying fundamentally in his line of questioning there that
00:06:20.440
the convoy was about people who were seeking to overthrow the government and i will say candace
00:06:25.960
bergen had the great response to that she said well there were no sedition charges which is a bit glib
00:06:31.560
but i think it's raising an important point here which is that all of these people want to say
00:06:35.700
that this was a coup and this was treason well i mean no police have said that the government's
00:06:40.600
not even said that we're not actually seeing that here it was people who might be expressing a
00:06:45.700
position the government wasn't all that fond of and at the federal level certainly the government
00:06:50.100
wasn't fond of the message of freedom and opposition to vaccine mandates but to say that
00:06:55.280
there is something that a conservative leader needs to be held to account for that never happened which
00:07:01.200
is this mass attempt at an insurrection is very disingenuous but a lot of people still reported
00:07:06.740
as though that's fact well they do and you were in the press conferences with the organizers during
00:07:11.880
the convoy and i was there too and they said explicitly they said multiple times tamara leach
00:07:18.000
said it bj dichter said it keith wilson said it they were not there to overthrow the government they
00:07:23.760
were not there to do what the do what the media is saying and you you just said it too
00:07:28.320
even the government doesn't roll doesn't run with this narrative the police don't run with this
00:07:32.600
narrative the only people peddling this sedition narrative this overthrowing the government
00:07:37.280
narrative are journalists the legacy media journalists who are kind of holding on to that
00:07:41.540
just that's their last thing they're holding on to to try and to try and continue their narrative
00:07:45.940
and it's slipping away because the the facts are coming out and and the problem is the organizers
00:07:52.640
never really stood a chance when the legacy media was always stacked against them they could have
00:07:57.900
said anything they could have repeated themselves a hundred times andrew they could have said a
00:08:02.820
hundred times they're not here to overthrow the government and that would not have changed anything
00:08:06.920
in my opinion they would have rolled with this narrative regardless so there was really nothing
00:08:11.580
that could be done and and in that interview with evan solomon candace bergen was or well not in the
00:08:18.120
interview but in a ctv article candace bergen then had to basically say and defend conservative
00:08:24.820
politicians going to a canada day event in ottawa we're now at the point where not only does a
00:08:30.600
conservative leader have to uh have to be accountable for something that didn't happen
00:08:35.180
a conservative leader then has to defend the right of their caucus members mps attending canada day
00:08:40.740
celebrations in ottawa this is just this is just insane yeah because it i mean what they're doing
00:08:47.560
here basically is saying that when a group of people who love freedom and wave canadian flags and are
00:08:53.580
opposed to vaccine mandates get together to celebrate canada day that is an inherently bad
00:08:59.240
place it's a bad thing to do it's you know filled with deplorables and bad people and again we're
00:09:04.940
gonna see i suspect uh by the end of this weekend uh the bouncy castles the pig roast the song maybe
00:09:12.900
not the saunas because it's july now but you're gonna see that same party-like atmosphere we saw in
00:09:18.400
january and february which mps were attending especially once aaron o'toole was deposed and then
00:09:24.360
you all of a sudden had mps with free reign to go out and talk to people and all that jazz but
00:09:29.200
the one thing that was fascinating about seeing that this comment is that again people are treating
00:09:33.640
this as news like this strikes me as the epitome of a non-newsworthy thing mps encouraged to meet
00:09:40.300
with constituents on canada day and hear their concerns that strikes me as what should just be
00:09:45.380
another day but again when you look at the media narrative of this this is some radical concept
00:09:49.580
yeah and they of course put quotes they put they put you know the quotes around freedom protest i
00:09:55.820
know it's it's it's so disingenuous it's so it's so ridiculous they've made freedom this swear word
00:10:02.020
this this word you can't say and they have to journalists feel they have to qualify the word freedom
00:10:08.300
with quotes around it it's it's it's incredible and of course as you said how is this news when when
00:10:14.540
the leader says she supports uh she supports the right for mps to be at canada day protests it's um
00:10:21.440
it's incredible and i i really hope we get to a point andrew where the word freedom is no longer
00:10:27.640
this big scary word where you're actually allowed to say yeah you know what i support one of the core
00:10:32.380
tenants of canada what it what it what it represents on the world stage is a free country
00:10:37.460
yeah it's up there with the canadian flag now like these things these symbols that uh the left claims
00:10:42.980
the right has appropriated and ruined forever whereas like you know if the right is the only
00:10:47.200
group that's allowed to wave the canadian flag and talk about freedom i'm okay with that but i
00:10:51.860
think they're they're they're relinquishing these things because they didn't like them all that much
00:10:55.820
in the uh the first place uh what else do we have going on this week so well we've got of course and
00:11:01.520
it was just a matter of time when they dropped the vaccine where they suspended i should say when the
00:11:06.920
government suspended the travel mandate the vaccine mandate and they said many times we'll bring it back if we
00:11:12.280
we knew the clock started ticking at that point until the media started to bring back the covet fear
00:11:18.620
mongering andrew tell us that covet is coming it's just around the corner we have to prepare for a
00:11:23.640
summer surge as the media setting the globe and mail just basically recycling headlines from the beginning
00:11:29.800
of 2020 here the globe mail wrote on uh june uh on june 29th fears of a covet 19 summer surge
00:11:37.400
prompt experts to call for a return to masking so here it is the the masks are going to come back
00:11:43.940
the fear is going to come back and we're going to have to likely if this continues while the
00:11:49.060
restrictions are going to come back to you and it was just as i said a matter of time so the article
00:11:52.860
writes it's time to bring back indoor mask wearing requirements says some health professionals amid
00:11:58.440
concerns of a potential surge in covet 19 cases this summer so all i say to these health officials
00:12:04.260
andrew is good luck with that good luck convincing canadians to bring back masks indoors i don't
00:12:10.720
think it's going to happen no this is the number one way to get another convoy to ottawa to just
00:12:16.280
reimpose a wave of a wave of restrictions and it's not going to be like the bouncy castle one this time
00:12:21.240
i think they're going to hold out longer than three weeks and they're going to do it in the summer
00:12:24.440
too yeah yeah exactly when they don't have the weather working against them i saw this and my
00:12:29.600
first response and i tweeted about this is that the experts nothing is stopping them from wearing
00:12:35.180
their masks as long as they want they can double mask triple mask they can do a an n95 with some
00:12:40.380
duct tape they can wear a full body suit do whatever they want that is absolutely their choice it's the
00:12:46.180
idea of imposing this reimposing some national or at the very least province-wide mask mandate that i i find
00:12:53.300
so absurd here and i was looking at this and just one example from this week and i know there are
00:12:59.020
others like this western university in my neck of the woods london ontario they announced on i think
00:13:05.520
it was wednesday that they're going mask free as of this week but their vaccine mandate their vaccine
00:13:12.240
mandate they say well we're gonna we're not going to tell you what we're going to do about that in
00:13:15.400
september 1st so if you're a student at western or a faculty member at western you can't actually plan
00:13:21.380
the next year because you won't know until days before the school year starts what the vaccine policy
00:13:27.380
is and the reason i bring that up in the context of this story is because it's that sort of damocles
00:13:34.680
that's always dangling in front of people now that we're always just one day away from some new wave of
00:13:40.000
restrictions coming back one wave away from more concerns more lockdowns more restrictions more vaccine
00:13:46.920
mandates and and this could just come and hit us at any point and this is something that i feel i mean
00:13:53.880
for the first you know 97 waves of restrictions and lockdowns and all that canadians did seem to
00:14:00.840
welcome this all but i'm not convinced that patience is there because i just and i know it's anecdotal but
00:14:07.220
people that dutifully went along with every lockdown they got double vax triple vax they did everything
00:14:12.240
they hit a breaking point not long before uh this summer and in some cases a little bit earlier but i just
00:14:19.600
don't think the will is there even among people that have followed every restriction up until this
00:14:25.000
point to deal with any more of them no and the cat's out of the bag i mean what you're seeing now
00:14:29.320
are you're seeing canadians traveling to europe where no mask basically no one is wearing any masks
00:14:35.300
there were no restrictions months ago and they weren't getting covered they weren't getting infected
00:14:40.240
they were coming back to places where there were masks people were wearing masks and there were some
00:14:45.020
restrictions and they were ending up with covid so people are starting to realize that you know it's
00:14:50.380
not the masks that are protecting them and and and now with everyone getting you know boosted and still
00:14:56.380
getting wave after wave of covid i mean people like you said are just gonna are just gonna realize that
00:15:02.540
this is not working this is not going to happen and if they try this people are just going to openly
00:15:08.780
you know disagree with this they're not going to follow along and they're and they're going to kind
00:15:12.820
of lose the respect from uh for the for the public health bureaucrats the institutions of these people
00:15:19.660
telling us what to do and just to just to get into some of these absurd headlines we saw at the
00:15:24.760
beginning of the week the fear-mongering has has come right back ctv wrote at the beginning of the week
00:15:30.940
and i can't even believe this was a headline written by ctv they wrote people with covid19 can infect
00:15:37.260
and sicken cats and dogs by cuddling them and they referenced a study they say that the research
00:15:44.460
that they referenced published this month in the journal of emerging infectious diseases involves
00:15:49.000
69 cats and 49 dogs including pets and animals from shelters and neuter clinics transmission from
00:15:55.800
humans to animals can be minimized by owners keeping their distance wearing a mask and taking other
00:16:01.260
precautions andrew so people in canada are supposed to distance themselves from their own pets and wear
00:16:08.000
masks around their own pets do they really take us for total idiots it's crazy no you see you're being
00:16:15.680
insensitive harrison this is the whole point is that they know that even the most cynical myopic
00:16:20.860
misanthropic people love animals so now if you're not prepared to wear your mask to save grandma you have
00:16:26.400
to wear your mask to save fido this is the rule now how dare you unbelievable it's uh it's it's really
00:16:34.400
really just absurd stuff and i do think they they take us a good chunk of us for total chumps and and
00:16:41.400
uh you know we we've seen we've seen data like this come out and it doesn't seem to affect or determine
00:16:48.800
any of the rules we're forced with we saw a study that said um well we saw a study that completely
00:16:55.440
ignored mental health and economic implications of canada's lockdowns and it said that canada's
00:17:01.020
covid19 response was better than many comparable countries and this was of course published in the
00:17:05.620
cbc but they don't mention the fact that the study they were referencing of canada's covid lockdowns
00:17:12.080
doesn't talk about the dangers and harms of the lockdowns on mental health and on the economy of our
00:17:18.940
country and all you have to do is look at true north's own reporting in july of 2021 we wrote a story
00:17:24.860
that said lockdowns killed more canadians under 65 than covid and the majority of covid victims were
00:17:30.600
very old and had serious health problems detailing exactly how the lockdowns and restrictions had
00:17:37.060
severe damage on canadians and how the the lockdown measures just although they might have minimized
00:17:45.160
covid numbers they they weren't overall positive and that's not going to be reported on and anytime it
00:17:51.140
does get reported on they're going to hide it around studies that don't even touch on those important
00:17:56.080
facets the reality of the situation where our lockdowns and our restrictions had severe problems in our
00:18:04.400
society it doesn't seem to one it doesn't seem to register with the with the people who make the
00:18:09.140
rules and and two it didn't seem like like journalists even care or want to talk about these things
00:18:15.240
no and i think this was the big media malfeasance we saw and and to be fair i think some of it was
00:18:22.300
not that journalists were getting it wrong i think some of it was that they were being fed bad
00:18:26.560
information we were just told to trust the so-called experts and trust the doctors and all of that and
00:18:31.460
people didn't have the scientific knowledge to challenge it and that is that we had this one track
00:18:36.360
focus on case counts and and the term that people used early on which i think is a valid one as a
00:18:41.940
case-demic when you have a pandemic and you're defining it solely in terms of what the cases are
00:18:46.840
without looking at things like the severity of those cases hospitalizations and then you devote all
00:18:52.260
your policy to getting to covet zero to getting cases down to zero and as a result you're locking
00:18:57.660
people down you're ruining child development it's i mean we can look at mental health numbers addictions
00:19:03.880
domestic violence all of that and i think that's important but it will take years years maybe even
00:19:09.800
decades really or a decade to see the collateral damage that's been caused by lockdowns when you
00:19:15.160
look at child development when you look at social integration and socialization and all of these
00:19:19.840
other things and you're right when they do this study and they don't even look at oh people who have
00:19:24.280
lost their jobs but it's okay yeah they had the sniffles for a couple of weeks uh and we prevented
00:19:28.960
more people from getting the sniffles in some cases but those people lost their small business they lost
00:19:33.700
their restaurant that doesn't strike me as a victory for a lockdown no it's it's not and and and but you
00:19:40.800
know what it's it's this sort of reporting and it's these sorts of studies that are intentionally
00:19:46.180
leaving out important facets of the pandemic key under-reported realities of the pandemic that will be relied
00:19:54.660
on when as when as we're already seeing the fear-mongering ramps up and there is another excuse
00:20:01.940
for governments to impose these restrictions i wouldn't be surprised to see research like this
00:20:09.260
be the justification to say if covid cases come up again that say well we need to not basically we
00:20:16.200
need to not learn from the reality situation where our lockdowns our rules and our restrictions
00:20:20.800
caused major societal problems no we need to go back to minimizing cases looking only at how many
00:20:28.720
people have the flu a mild flu and and just basically turn a total blind eye to all of the all the
00:20:36.780
issues we know now from these brutal restrictions and andrew switching gears on uh on the show we came
00:20:45.580
across this funny article in the toronto star from althia raj and this is this is sort of in line
00:20:52.340
with the the perception of conservatives being negative and nasty and and it's sort of a carryover
00:21:01.080
from the freedom convoy coverage of the people who are just wanting freedom who are lovely people
00:21:08.440
who are people that you know would be your neighbors in your communities they're actually
00:21:13.180
these sort of nasty and rude people and so we saw this article from althia raj which basically uh talks
00:21:20.800
about her frustration with the anger and the nasty comments from the conservatives in the house of
00:21:27.260
commons and the the title of this story is uh it starts off with bend over you're despicable name
00:21:34.720
calling and disrespect are now all too common in the house of commons and so she starts off by saying
00:21:41.720
from my my from my perch above the speaker's chair this week i witnessed a shocking level of name
00:21:46.500
calling and disrespect you're despicable and bend over where some of the insults hurled from
00:21:50.700
the conservative side toward the liberal benches so of course what a surprise andrew this article is
00:21:57.100
criticizing conservatives the opposition in government for getting a little too rowdy in the
00:22:02.640
house of commons i i've sat in in question period in in queens park and i've i've i've watched enough
00:22:09.200
question period here at true north to know that name calling like you know some some uh some good
00:22:16.620
jabs and and some some some good back and forth some good banter is what you do in the house of
00:22:23.160
commons that's what it's always been and that's how it is in every westminster system yeah and i think
00:22:28.600
the one thing that i found interesting here and she mentioned it i think in the very first paragraph is
00:22:33.000
that every june this is the gripe journalists and politicians complain about the toxicity in the
00:22:39.020
house of commons every june so if it's happening every year then it stands to reason that this is
00:22:43.940
something that no one's had any interest in in doing anything about and that spans from government
00:22:49.000
to government from opposition to opposition as these things change over time and again i'm not
00:22:54.600
going to say politics is not a place that invites incivility i don't know if the conduct from mps is
00:23:01.620
getting worse i think certainly political discourse on social media has gotten worse but at the end of
00:23:07.040
the day if this is a recurring thing the people that are supposed to do something about it are the
00:23:13.300
people that are in politics and you have the speaker of the house who right now is a liberal who has the
00:23:18.480
ability to throw out anyone who's used unparliamentary language so i i think that a lot of the times
00:23:23.980
people will take little excerpts and little words that yeah someone probably shouldn't have said or might
00:23:29.060
not have been the most acceptable and we could say perhaps they should have expressed themselves a different
00:23:33.560
way but you also were talking about a group of people that are thrown into a room 338 of them
00:23:39.340
that is by design adversarial well they talk about things that affect people's lives so if there wasn't
00:23:46.600
passion in that room i'd be very concerned exactly and this is what has been the case forever you can
00:23:54.000
you can go back and read transcripts from question period since the very beginning of our country
00:23:58.740
oh some of the old school ones are great like he's a lily livered cod swallow hoggler
00:24:03.540
it's i made that up but it's something like that if we could if we could decipher it into into modern
00:24:09.440
english i'm sure that they would uh they would they would really really get under the skin of uh
00:24:15.080
liberal journalists like althea raj but i mean we have we have countless examples of our prime minister
00:24:21.140
using rather unparliamentary language in the house of commons and in 2011 uh this is what
00:24:27.880
justin trudeau said to conservative minister of the environment peter kent just watch this
00:24:33.400
well mr speaker my honorable colleague if she had been in durban would have seen that in fact
00:24:38.680
canada was among the leaders in creating the order
00:24:43.880
order
00:24:47.080
so there you go andrew that's not what i would consider to be parliamentary language i wonder what
00:25:10.600
althea raj would have said about that if she was sitting above or sitting in her perch above the
00:25:15.420
speaker's chair as she said yeah i don't i see i i'll actually give i'll give althea credit i don't
00:25:20.660
think althea is the problem here i think the problem that we have is outsiders looking into this
00:25:26.120
and i'm not not like outsiders in the sense of people that aren't sitting in the chambers
00:25:29.900
thinking it's bad but what do you propose is the solution and i think that's the issue here is that
00:25:36.680
do we want to just police language more in there do we want to start taking them out to the woodshed and
00:25:41.560
you know giving them a couple of penalties anytime someone heckles impolitely or something like that
00:25:46.280
and i guess that's the issue is like it seems to be a problem that everyone kind of calls out as a
00:25:51.080
problem but i don't see a solution that doesn't just make things a heck of a lot worse and i think
00:25:56.780
anytime someone goes to the can't we all get along why aren't we nicer thing their natural instinct is
00:26:02.900
to find that the the other side is meaner than their side when i suspect you'll find a lot of evidence
00:26:08.260
this is going in every which direction oh yeah no absolutely and and no maybe it's not just althea
00:26:14.200
raj putting this forward but again it's the idea that there the that the comment needs to be made
00:26:19.840
about conservatives in the house of commons you know having you know unparliamentary language
00:26:24.520
and and unsavory language as as you said it's been that way forever it goes both ways it's designed
00:26:31.360
to be that way and everybody knows and that mps are passionate and like you said if you're not
00:26:37.480
passionate about the issues especially in a time like right now that we're living through in which
00:26:42.400
our government is taking massive liberty upon themselves to shrink the liberty of canadians
00:26:49.380
that is a time in which i would expect most conservative mps or most opposition mps regardless
00:26:55.080
of political stripe to get fired up to have you know to let them hear it to let the government hear it
00:27:01.440
because that is kind of what the whole system is set up to do yeah very much so and we always try to
00:27:07.240
end things on a bit of a lighter note so uh we're going to call you all racists if you have front
00:27:11.880
lawns that's our version of a lighter note here on fake news friday because also the toronto star
00:27:17.300
interestingly enough they're on on the greatest hits list this week as a column lawns are an outdated
00:27:23.080
cultural norm let's lose them before we lose the pollinators and they say that being a lawn owner
00:27:30.420
used to be a symbol of being rich rich enough to hold land and not need to farm on it but this is just
00:27:35.740
an outdated cultural norm it's classist it's supposed to differentiate the aristocrats from
00:27:40.740
the farmers and now it's just a sign of societal excess but this is actually part of a long-standing
00:27:47.160
grievance that people have that we can go back to a globe and mail piece a couple of years ago
00:27:51.860
about the need to decolonize the lawn we need to decolonize the lawn because a lawn is you saying that
00:27:58.860
you're vanquishing nature which is a part according to one history professor of settler culture so if
00:28:05.740
you have a lawn you are disenfranchising indigenous people and you are a classist aristocrat i think
00:28:11.700
i've gotten it right i think you do and i'm reading this quote from the global mail piece from 2020 and
00:28:18.980
it's at the back end of a longer quote from a canadian history professor and he says when he's
00:28:26.340
talking about backyards this time not front lawns he says a backyard with a big lawn is like a classroom
00:28:31.820
for colonialism and environmental hostility so i guess they're really upset about about about nice
00:28:38.740
lawns and and this funny thing is from the toronto star when they talk about the time you know the lawn is
00:28:45.780
an outdated cultural norm we should just i guess bulldoze the lawns and pave them over and they
00:28:52.220
they say of course that the reason the lawn is a problem is because of biodiversity and climate
00:28:58.620
crises so those competing biodiversity and climate crises what better way andrew to solve those climate
00:29:04.720
crises than to just pave over your lawns yeah we got to do the joni mitchell song uh pave paradise and put
00:29:10.200
up a parking lot so everyone needs a concrete front yard now in fairness there are people that have turned
00:29:15.000
their lawns i forget the term i think it's like living lawns or something or they do like front
00:29:19.220
lawn gardens and if you're going to tend to them that's very nice but i assure you if i were to turn
00:29:23.640
my front lawn into a garden of some kind because i can barely grow grass so i i'm not decolonized i'm
00:29:29.020
not colonizing anyone because i can't you know grow anything but weeds there not weed weeds uh and uh
00:29:34.840
this is the thing that i find hilarious that we all need to just like let the bees take over
00:29:39.580
apparently and that i mean this planet of the apes is going to be planet of the bees uh because
00:29:43.500
that's the only way to outdate the outdated norm make it outdated whatever the case is who knows
00:29:48.840
well yeah and and if you did that andrew you'd be following the toronto stars guideline you'd be
00:29:53.720
following their manual in it they say to maintain natural debris including dead stems and dry leaves
00:30:00.220
what may seem messy to some people is habitat to wildlife so you know if you have a lawn just let it go
00:30:05.700
let it kind of be an awful mess let weeds grow in it and leave leave a bunch of of i don't know
00:30:13.280
you know dead dead branches and dead stems in it i mean this is no this is great airs and when my wife
00:30:19.220
asked me to rake the leaves in the fall i'll just say ah i'm uh i'm decolonizing i can't rake the leaves
00:30:25.580
they've got to stay they've got to stay there and i'm just listening to the toronto star yeah well i won't
00:30:30.760
use that because i don't think that's authoritative but i'll uh i'll appeal to our uh our greater goals
00:30:35.480
as a society to move beyond colonization i the last year the issue was we couldn't fly the canadian
00:30:40.880
flag this year you can't grow your grass so uh do whatever works for you there i hope you are all
00:30:45.900
having an absolutely wonderful dominion day wherever you're celebrating whether you're in ottawa or at
00:30:50.040
home uh thanks very much for indulging harrison faulkner on the other end of the virtual microphone
00:30:55.700
host of the show ratioed and i'm andrew lawton harrison have a good dominion day
00:31:00.760
and to you andrew all right to the rest of you we'll talk to you next week with more fake news
00:31:04.980
friday thank you god bless and have a good weekend
Link copied!