Juno News - Liberal ministers rally behind Justin Trudeau

00:00:00 Transcription by CastingWords

00:00:30 Thank you.

00:01:00 welcome to canada's most irreverent talk show this is the andrew lawton show brought to you by true

00:01:19 north hello and welcome to you all canada's most irreverent talk show here the andrew lawton show

00:01:29 on this wednesday june 26 2024 just after one o'clock eastern time that makes it a rather

00:01:37 convivial still 10 a.m for you folks on the west coast and 11 a.m in just getting to lunchtime if

00:01:44 you are in Alberta, and I think Saskatchewan is two hours right now. Yeah, Saskatchewan's the

00:01:50 weird one, and the time always bounces around, and don't even get me started on the crazy

00:01:53 Newfoundlanders with your 30-minute time zone. But anyway, wherever you are, whether you're

00:01:57 listening live or tuned in on our podcast or YouTube, or I don't really think you're allowed

00:02:02 to get us on Facebook anymore, but maybe you found the way around Bill C18, I welcome you to

00:02:08 the show. I want to begin today by talking a little bit more about the conservative upset

00:02:13 in Toronto St. Paul's Monday night.

00:02:15 This was the tremendous and rather unforeseen victory

00:02:19 by Conservative candidate Don Stewart,

00:02:22 now MP-elect Don Stewart,

00:02:24 over the Liberals' hand-picked Leslie Church

00:02:27 in a riding that the Liberals have held for more than 30 years.

00:02:31 This is a Liberal stronghold,

00:02:33 as we said time and time again throughout the show yesterday

00:02:36 and as other commentators have pointed out.

00:02:39 And the big question, which I knew the answer to already,

00:02:41 but the pundits nevertheless were asking it was,

00:02:44 ooh, will Justin Trudeau resign over this?

00:02:47 Will he resign?

00:02:48 Will he finally take the hint and go?

00:02:50 Well, the answer is basically no.

00:02:53 This is what he said yesterday at a press conference

00:02:55 that took place during this very show

00:02:57 in which he decided not to take any questions from reporters.

00:03:01 Oh, we don't have that.

00:03:02 Nevermind.

00:03:03 Basically, Justin Trudeau said,

00:03:04 wait, we do or we don't?

00:03:08 I don't know if we, oh, we don't.

00:03:09 Okay.

00:03:10 Sean said, we don't have,

00:03:11 oh never mind we don't and i didn't know if he was never minding the uh we don't or never minding

00:03:15 that we do anyway uh maybe well you don't want to hear justin trudeau anyway so uh justin trudeau

00:03:20 was uh basically saying he's not going to go anywhere there's work to do and yada yada yada

00:03:25 and as if to drive home the point he has had all of the little trained monkey cabinet ministers

00:03:31 uh coming out in the course of their press conferences across the country yesterday and

00:03:37 and today, telling us that they have confidence in Justin Trudeau.

00:03:41 Here was Karina Gould on with Vashti Capellos.

00:03:45 Minister, should the Prime Minister resign as leader of your party?

00:03:49 No, no.

00:03:50 Why not?

00:03:52 Well, look, I mean, yes, yesterday was definitely a tough loss for us as Liberals.

00:03:58 I mean, we certainly didn't expect to lose in Toronto St. Paul's.

00:04:03 Start by congratulating Mr. Stewart on his win.

00:04:06 He obviously worked very hard and thanking Leslie Church, our fantastic candidate, who ran an excellent campaign.

00:04:14 But, you know, it was it was a message for us, certainly, that we need to do better, that we need to listen more closely to what the voters, not just in Toronto, St. Paul's, but right across the country are telling us.

00:04:27 But no, I don't think it means that the prime minister needs to resign.

00:04:33 Oh, we're going to listen.

00:04:34 Yeah, no, it hadn't actually occurred to anyone before now to listen, but that's Karina Gould's

00:04:40 great promise. We're just going to listen. And Mark Miller decided to, he used some weird

00:04:46 wrestling analogy at one point, but he decided the immigration minister, Mark Miller, to go on

00:04:51 the offensive and take aim at Pierre Polyev when he was asked. Now, he used some dirty words here,

00:04:58 so we had to bleep it for our delicate ears, but this was Mark Miller on Pierre Polyev this morning.

00:05:04 How can the government appeal to voters who support Mr. Prodiev when members of the government, including yourself, have called them things like a snake oil salesman or, as you said earlier, a wrestling manager from the 80s?

00:05:16 Look, I've been quite clear. I think the guy's a fake. We shouldn't focus too much on this guy. 0.82

00:05:22 I think Canadians are smart. And as I've said, Canadians have pretty good bullet detectors and they know when they're being bulleted.

00:05:29 And that's just the reality of things.

00:05:31 i think over the course of the year people will realize that and and and i you know i trust you

00:05:37 got to trust canadians they sent us a note they sent us a message on uh well earlier yesterday

00:05:43 morning and that's a message that we can't ignore so yes uh yes we have someone that uh is peddling

00:05:54 politics that we have not seen in canada in my lifetime but i don't think in the history of

00:05:59 canada he's imported it from the south in his own style and it works for him so let it work for him

00:06:06 let canadians be the judge we also have a job to govern over the next year and that means

00:06:10 actually doing the work canadians are frustrated with us for their own reasons that have nothing

00:06:14 to do with pierre polyev he's uh he's weaponizing that let's be clear about that but let's also talk

00:06:20 about visions of canada i love my country i'm gonna fight for every inch of it he's a bs-er 0.95

00:06:25 he's a snake oil salesman he's a wrestler wrestling manager from the 80s i'm sure that

00:06:30 reference means something to someone but uh he says oh well you know canadians don't like that

00:06:35 canadians aren't really fond of that we shouldn't even pay any attention to uh him mark miller said

00:06:40 now let me first off say here that i think people should very very much pay attention and and they

00:06:47 should pay attention so much that they might be interested in perhaps reading a biography that's

00:06:52 It's been written about Pierre Pauly.

00:06:54 Oh, well, you look at here.

00:06:56 Oh, my God, I forgot I wrote one of these things.

00:06:58 So it's already been on the bestsellers list for, I hope, today it will be five weeks.

00:07:03 The list hasn't come out today.

00:07:05 So unlike what Mark Miller says there, Canadians are actually paying attention to him and do care what he has to say.

00:07:11 The reason that the Conservatives did so well in Toronto St. Paul's on Monday is because, in part, they are not buying the Liberal doomsaying about Pierre Paulyev.

00:07:21 They are not buying the Liberal attacks and smears about him.

00:07:24 They're finding him at worst for the Liberals likable or at best just not as unlikable as the Liberals have been trying to pretend.

00:07:32 But what's interesting here is that all of these MPs and ministers that have been coming out are saying the same thing.

00:07:38 Yes, I have confidence. Yes, I have confidence. Yes, he's going to be great. It's awesome.

00:07:42 I mean, no, of course he doesn't need to step down.

00:07:44 Now, Ryan Turnbull, who's a backbench MP, had said that he'll, well, he's, he, he, let

00:07:50 me just hear what he said in his words.

00:07:52 It was a little bit more tepid than it was from Mark Miller.

00:07:56 To follow up to that, since you mentioned the by-election last night, what does it say

00:08:02 about your leader's ability to lead the party to a general election win next fall?

00:08:07 Well, I think that's hard to predict, right?

00:08:10 I mean, I think from my perspective, we've had a leader of the Liberal Party and the Government of Canada

00:08:18 that's done an impeccable job for many years now, and it's hard for me to pronounce on his leadership ability.

00:08:28 All I've seen is great leadership coming from him, from my perspective.

00:08:32 And so, you know, I continue to support our Prime Minister,

00:08:35 and I know that he'll have to re-evaluate

00:08:39 and look at the results of last night by election

00:08:41 and do some reflecting, but that's up to him.

00:08:46 Ah, he'll do some reflecting.

00:08:48 So when he's finished doing the listening

00:08:49 that Karina Gould has prescribed,

00:08:52 he'll do some reflecting, he'll do some soul searching

00:08:55 and then all roads will lead to Mark Miller's view

00:08:57 that, ah, well, Pierre Polyev is a BSer,

00:08:59 no Canadians like him, even though, well, what's this?

00:09:02 Oh yeah, a new poll came out today

00:09:04 and showed him up 19 percent so it's not as good as the 20 he was up in the abacus poll last week

00:09:10 now he's up only 19 so maybe the liberals will get to you know keep one more toronto seat the

00:09:15 way things are going right now so the liberals don't get that they are the problem sarah stock

00:09:21 who is a young relatively new reporter with rebel news went over to leslie church's campaign office

00:09:28 as they were packing things up i don't know if it was yesterday or today and she heard a remarkably

00:09:33 fascinating explanation from one of leslie church's campaign volunteers for why leslie church

00:09:40 and the liberals really lost and uh would you believe if if i said they think it's foreign

00:09:45 interference surprise she was leading by 700 and then uh woke up this morning and uh it was about

00:09:56 590 for Stuart.

00:09:58 Why do you think that is?

00:10:00 I think there was electoral interference by Melissa Lansman. 1.00

00:10:05 She sent letters to the Jewish community to vote for Conservative.

00:10:11 What are your guys' thoughts on the election results from last night?

00:10:19 Oh, when I said foreign interference, I didn't mean from China or India.

00:10:24 No, no, no. It was Thornhill interference. Melissa Lansman, the deputy leader of the

00:10:30 Conservative Party, an MP for Thornhill, which is, I don't know, like 15 minutes from this writing,

00:10:35 she was interfering by sending out a letter supporting the Conservatives. This is why on

00:10:40 campaigns you want to give your volunteers a basic level of media training. This poor guy,

00:10:45 I mean, good for him. He's getting involved in democracy. He's doing the work of dismantling

00:10:49 signs, volunteering on a campaign after you've lost would be incredibly demoralizing. So good

00:10:55 on him. And you know what? He spoke to the media. Good for him as well. But the answer is remarkably

00:11:00 revealing. There's no way the Conservatives could have just won that election fair and square.

00:11:05 There had to have been nefarious interference from that foreign hostile state actor that is 0.64

00:11:11 the riding of Thornhill. Frank Graves, who is a Liberal pollster, had posted this this morning.

00:11:18 And again, my position on this is that the liberals are just so baffled that anyone could not vote for them.

00:11:23 They have to come up with all sorts of conspiracy theories for why not.

00:11:27 So Frank Graves is trying to say that conservative voters are all prone to disinformation.

00:11:33 If you opposed vaccine mandates, he believes you are disinformed.

00:11:37 And he's trying to basically say that conservatives are all knuckle dragging rubes who are injecting disinformation into their veins.

00:11:44 because that's the only way to explain how the Conservatives could possibly win in Toronto St. Paul's. 0.75

00:11:51 It is absolutely absurd.

00:11:54 And what's interesting is that this is just, I mean, this, what's the word that I'm looking for

00:11:59 that I can say in an audience that might have a few children?

00:12:02 I'll tone it down a little bit.

00:12:04 The utter deference to Justin Trudeau is only coming from federal Liberal MPs and Cabinet Ministers.

00:12:10 other people in the broader liberal family are not all on team Trudeau in fact Bonnie Crombie

00:12:16 who's the new leader of the Ontario Liberal Party and she is formerly a Liberal MP she served

00:12:22 alongside Justin Trudeau and she was in federal politics before she became the mayor of Mississauga

00:12:27 and now she's in provincial politics and I went to school with her son as a fun fact it was actually

00:12:32 at a house party hosted by him so not everyone can be it was like a liberal conservative thing

00:12:37 on campus everyone got along it was a simpler time but uh bonnie cry now i brought it adam alex

00:12:42 crombie is going to get canceled now because uh you know people learned he was hanging out with

00:12:46 me in university but anyway or maybe bonnie crombie will be canceled uh but anyway so bonnie

00:12:51 crombie she was asked about the justin trudeau brand by a reporter colin de bello at queen's

00:12:57 park and it was interesting how much distance she was trying to put between herself and justin

00:13:02 Trudeau as a liberal. Do you think that at this point your personal support in Ontario would be

00:13:10 better off if the prime minister was no longer the prime minister? You know I respect our prime

00:13:16 minister. I've worked very closely with him. I'm not going to make any comment about our federal

00:13:20 party. The progressive conservatives have already deployed commercials trying to paint Crombie as a

00:13:26 Trudeau liberal. Oh the new Ontario liberal leader. Of course friends with Justin Trudeau. Crombie

00:13:32 is hitting back i think the bigger friend is is is doug ford is the closer friend of justin trudeau

00:13:38 you see them um in photographs and in meetings together uh quite often i probably speak to the

00:13:45 prime minister less than once a year i love that the ontario election if it's called early is

00:13:50 going to be like who knows justin trudeau better vote against that person so bonnie crombie is

00:13:55 basically hanging up on justin trudeau just so she can say no no no doug ford's out there with him

00:14:00 he's the Trudeau guy, not me. So if you're an Ontarian, I mean, you've heard Doug Ford do this

00:14:05 at press conferences. Oh yeah, Chrystia Freeland's a real champ. She's a friend. She's a real champion.

00:14:10 He says all sorts of nice things. We'll get back to the Jewish aspect of this, of Toronto St. Paul's

00:14:16 a little bit later on in the show and how anti-Semitism did motivate a lot of votes

00:14:20 towards the Conservatives that historically have not gone there. But I first want to talk about

00:14:24 something that should be able to unite us all, which is our hatred of dissolving paper straws.

00:14:29 I know the plastics ban is something that the federal court ruled was unconstitutional, but the Liberal government is still defending it.

00:14:37 And in fact, this very week, the Liberals are defending it in the Federal Court of Appeal.

00:14:43 Intervening on the anti-ban side of the equation is Christine Van Gein's group, the Canadian Constitution Foundation, where she is the litigation director.

00:14:53 And she joins us now. Christine, always good to talk to you. Thanks for coming on today.

00:14:57 Thanks for having me on, Andrew. 0.99

00:14:58 Now, I mean, I'm just against like the ban on principle because I despise the stupid paper straws. You're actually taking an argument that is far more rooted in the Constitution than just, you know, your honor, the paper straws are crap. So what's the argument here? 0.99

00:15:12 Yeah, I mean, so the case is about plastics. It's about this federal plastics ban. You know,

00:15:17 as an organization, I don't feel especially strongly about the issue. I mean, I like sea

00:15:23 turtles. I don't like paper straws. But what bothered me about this federal plastics ban

00:15:30 isn't just that it isn't really the paper straws. It's a much bigger issue. It's that the federal

00:15:36 government, the Trudeau government seems obsessed with trying to overregulate the lives of Canadians

00:15:42 by meddling in provinces' businesses, contrary to our constitutional division of powers.

00:15:47 And we've seen this happen before.

00:15:49 I mean, the Impact Assessment Act reference was all about this.

00:15:54 But basically what happened in this case was the federal cabinet, by way of regulation,

00:16:01 so there was no debate in parliament about this, they deemed every single plastic product

00:16:06 from safety helmets for construction site workers to life jackets to pipes to plastic straws and

00:16:16 store sticks. Every single one of them has been deemed toxic under a federal cabinet order. And

00:16:24 I think a lot of Canadians would be surprised to learn that this was done through Parliament's

00:16:29 power to regulate the criminal law. So they signed this order claiming that this is under

00:16:34 their criminal law authority the problem is that is not how the federal criminal law authority

00:16:40 works you don't just say something is under criminal law under federal criminal law power

00:16:45 and suddenly that is like an incantation and you say those words and it makes it so

00:16:52 it's not like bibbidi-bobbidi plastic man uh it doesn't make saying it doesn't make it so

00:16:57 so they actually need to show that it it would be an actually dangerous substance uh which of course

00:17:04 plastics, which are ubiquitous in our society, are not. There are varying levels of potential harm

00:17:14 and potential safety. So it was overly broad. I spoke about this a few weeks back with a plastics

00:17:20 expert who, he was approaching this from the science perspective, which is that calling

00:17:25 plastics toxic is in and of itself incredibly wrong. And he had a litany of evidence and

00:17:31 research and studies he showed the reality is we wrap medical products in plastic we make medical

00:17:37 products out of plastic we eat and drink with plastic and out of plastic so if this was all

00:17:43 toxic that is probably going to spell a much greater problem here I'm curious in this case

00:17:48 how much of that argument is relevant or is this strictly an up and down constitutional question

00:17:53 of is this a criminal matter no so that was a big part of it it's just not what our particular

00:17:58 interest is. Yeah, you're an intervener in the case, just for context. You're not the litigant.

00:18:04 So the first day of the hearing, the federal government spent a lot of time describing

00:18:08 the potential harms from plastics. And there were some environmental regulators like animal justice

00:18:15 and eco justice who talked about the hypotheticals about animals. Frankly, they're not hypotheticals,

00:18:24 the ring carriers that can harm birds and things like that.

00:18:28 The problem is, it's this wildly expansive argument

00:18:32 to say that every single plastic item

00:18:37 has the same level of potential danger

00:18:39 and therefore they are all toxic.

00:18:42 I mean, the council for the plastics coalition

00:18:46 who brought this challenge,

00:18:48 she talked about how she wears contact lenses

00:18:51 And these are quite different in nature from a plastic straw.

00:18:55 And with the government, if they want to regulate some specific harm, for example, this this this issue that people are always bringing up of the plastic straws being stuck in sea turtles noses, that it's it's actually more about the shape and the the the way the plastic straws are disposed of than it is about the fact that they're made of plastic.

00:19:20 Yeah, like a metal straw that would be reusable that, you know, got lodged in a sea turtle, I imagine, would be just as bad, if not worse.

00:19:26 Yeah, so, I mean, what they need to do is actually show that there's potential harm, there's some level of harm that could justify putting plastics as an entire category of items onto the list of toxic substances.

00:19:43 And we argued that it's just wildly expansive, that you can't just say something is harmful.

00:19:51 You need to actually have some evidence that it's harmful and that this expansive approach

00:19:58 is inappropriate.

00:19:58 And it's an abuse of the federal government's criminal law power.

00:20:03 I remember with the carbon tax case that you were involved in with another organization,

00:20:08 you had some interveners that were really trying to push the emergency angle.

00:20:12 say the federal government can act on climate policy because it's an emergency are we hearing

00:20:17 any of that on the plastics case no that it wasn't on on those grounds that's good i was it was but

00:20:23 that problem is a lot of environmental policy it tends to be uh you know defended on i think some

00:20:28 some grounds that are just absolutely absurd and here you have a government that's just being very

00:20:32 ideological about it and as you know they're just trying to will this constitutional basis

00:20:37 and authority into reality when there doesn't seem to be a basis for it yeah i think what we

00:20:42 need to think about is when the framers of our original constitution in the 1860s decided that

00:20:49 they were going to give the federal government and not the provinces control of criminal law

00:20:55 it was premised on the idea that parliament would be using that authority to prevent actual harm

00:21:01 not just meddling in in the day-to-day lives of Canadians and when the government overreaches like

00:21:08 this when the federal government overreaches like this they are um what it's referred what lawyers

00:21:14 call ultra veras it's outside of the scope of their authority and that makes it the the use

00:21:19 of the power in this way unconstitutional that's why the lower court struck down this plastics ban

00:21:26 as unconstitutional it was it there was not evidence that these products are harmful uh as

00:21:33 as an entire category and why there is a stay in place.

00:21:38 So I think that we need to think about the broader problems,

00:21:44 the bigger threat of allowing the federal government

00:21:48 to overreach this way,

00:21:49 because Canadian federalism is a genius,

00:21:53 brilliant innovation.

00:21:55 It prevents the concentration of power

00:21:58 within any single institution or level of government.

00:22:01 And it creates these sort of laboratories of democracy across Canada where different jurisdictions can tailor different policy solutions and figure out what works best.

00:22:10 And waste management has been under the scope of authority of provincial and municipal jurisdictions.

00:22:16 And some provinces, some municipalities have decided to take one approach to plastics regulation or plastic recycling or waste management.

00:22:26 And other provinces have taken different approaches.

00:22:28 it's not for the federal government to come in then and use a sweeping authority to claim

00:22:34 their ability to regulate every single type of plastic imaginable under the

00:22:41 claim that it's a criminal law issue i'm always curious in why people advocate against their own

00:22:48 self-interest and their own autonomy and and in this i'm looking at british columbia

00:22:53 which as a province has said regardless of what happens with this case they're going to continue

00:22:58 to regulate things at the provincial level they've got the right to do that yet they're in this case

00:23:02 defending Ottawa's right like why are they as a province not seeing the concerns with this imagine

00:23:07 if perhaps a conservative government that is more hostile to the agenda of the BC NDP government

00:23:12 comes in and wants to trample into jurisdiction in a different direction I mean sometimes people

00:23:19 intervene or make arguments on an outcome-based approach they just like a particular outcome

00:23:24 It's really difficult to take a position like we do at the Canadian Constitution Foundation, where you need to think about the big picture, and not just your immediate self interest. So yes, British Columbia typically sides with more stringent environmental regulation. So if they're looking at it at an outcome based approach, then that's why they would argue this, but it isn't looking at the big picture.

00:23:52 And I think if you think about this issue from the big picture perspective, there's all kinds of things that the federal government may use to or will try to claim are under the federal criminal law power in order to sweep in their ability to regulate.

00:24:09 So it's widely assumed that Canada is going to uphold oil and gas emissions caps and the Clean Electricity Regulation, which are both currently in draft form, through the criminal law power under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.

00:24:25 There's concern that the federal government would try to regulate things like the electricity market or technology options using the criminal law power.

00:24:35 And Ottawa would essentially, in this regard, become master of all environmental policy in our country.

00:24:41 And when you think about it in a big picture like that, that may not be in British Columbia's best interest, even though siding with the federal government in this particular case may get them the outcome that they prefer.

00:24:56 Well, we'll certainly keep an eye out for this. I know the wheels of justice tend to move quite slowly. Do you anticipate when a decision will be made, keeping in mind that it could very well go to the Supreme Court beyond that?

00:25:08 Yeah, so typically we say in appeals, we expect a decision within six months.

00:25:14 Sometimes it's sooner, sometimes it's longer.

00:25:16 So that's the only guidance I can give you.

00:25:20 Yeah, it'll come when it comes is basically the less polished answer there.

00:25:25 Christine Van Gein, Litigation Director for the Canadian Constitution Foundation.

00:25:28 Keep up the great work and thanks for coming on today.

00:25:31 Always a pleasure, Andrew.

00:25:32 All right, thanks very much, Christine.

00:25:34 I wanted to take a bit of a different spin on this.

00:25:37 Obviously, the results of the Toronto St. Paul's by-election are well known by now.

00:25:41 But there was mobilizing behind the scenes a campaign that even I had only peripherally been made aware of closer to the end of it.

00:25:49 And it was a campaign to advocate in the riding at a riding level for Jews and allies of Jews to realize that, hey, anti-Semitism is a big problem and you need a political change to deal with that.

00:26:03 that was a campaign called jewishally.ca, and it was the brainchild of a gentleman who's been a

00:26:10 guest on this show a couple of times, Andrew Kirsch, who's a former CSIS intelligence officer,

00:26:16 also author of the book I Was Never Here, which is a fantastic book, and you should go back and

00:26:21 look at my long-form interview with Andrew. I think it was a couple of years back now when

00:26:25 that book came out, and he had reached out to a longtime friend of mine, Stephen Taylor,

00:26:30 who is a longtime conservative activist as well

00:26:33 and has experience setting up

00:26:34 what are called third party groups.

00:26:36 These are groups that are not political parties,

00:26:39 but they're engaged and regulated

00:26:41 and registered with Elections Canada

00:26:42 to mobilize on issues.

00:26:45 So I wanted to delve into exactly what this was,

00:26:48 why it was important

00:26:48 and what it might mean for the future

00:26:51 with an election coming up

00:26:52 in potentially 15 months or less.

00:26:55 Andrew Kirsch and Stephen Taylor join me now.

00:26:58 Andrew, Stephen, thank you so much for coming on today. Good to talk.

00:27:01 Great to be here. Thanks for having me. Now, I'll start with you, Andrew, because you and I

00:27:06 were candidates for the provincial election in 2018 at the same time. And I would have said at

00:27:12 the beginning of the election that I had a much greater shot at getting elected than you because

00:27:16 you were running in St. Paul's, which at the time was, you know, I'm curious about your sort of sense

00:27:21 of what your chances of winning were going in. Of course, in the end, we both lost. So, you know,

00:27:26 the joke is on me, but you've still very much stayed involved in this, I think. And especially

00:27:32 now that you're out of CSIS, you've got the ability to be a lot more forceful and forthright

00:27:37 about your political leanings, of course. But explain to me why you wanted to get involved in

00:27:42 this campaign. Well, I'm born and raised in Toronto St. Paul's. I live in Toronto St. Paul's

00:27:48 right now, raising my family here. So, and I ran in 2018. People said, you know, why Toronto St.

00:27:55 calls because of that kind of long shot well that's that's where i live that's where i wanted

00:27:59 to represent so i'm very familiar with how challenging uh a riding that it is i had to

00:28:06 obviously take a step back from involvement formal involvement when we did this third party

00:28:11 and really i wanted to organize around an issue that was important to me that had

00:28:17 particular resonance in in the riding we toronto st paul's does have i think the fifth largest

00:28:22 Jewish population, member of the Jewish community. And since October 7th, not just the events of

00:28:29 October 7th, really the response since then, there's been growing, the Jewish community's

00:28:35 been upset, disappointed by the response of the liberal government to rising anti-Semitism. I

00:28:42 say that the Jewish community has diverse views on Israel, on the conduct of the current conflict,

00:28:48 But we're very united in the concern about anti-Semitism, that there are protests coming through our neighborhood, that our Jewish day schools and synagogues are being shot at and firebombed.

00:28:59 And so I kind of want to take a step back from the campaign to start this, to think of what a way to raise awareness of this issue in a riding where it was uniquely affected by it and had an opportunity in the by-election to raise awareness of it.

00:29:15 And of course, this campaign takes the form of what's called Jewish Ally, the website's still online, jewishally.ca. How did you get involved, Stephen?

00:29:27 Well, Andrew reached out in January and said, look, he wanted to obviously react to this

00:29:34 rising anti-Semitism that, you know, we've all seen. And again, he, you know, he mentioned the

00:29:41 violence in the community and, you know, by-election is a perfect time to register your

00:29:48 distaste with how things are going and how the government is handling these affairs and its

00:29:55 reaction to the rising anti-semitism and violence against the jewish community

00:29:59 so he reached out and um i said let's let's build something that's first of all um positive it it

00:30:08 kind of re reaffirms some hope within the community and and uh its friends so uh i pitched the idea

00:30:16 jewishally.ca as a way to sort of uh rally uh the jewish community and its allies so you don't

00:30:25 necessarily have to be jewish to uh support it uh but uh it is especially you know to support the

00:30:31 jewish community and and allow its allies a venue to do so so i'll go back to you on on this andrew

00:30:38 i mean your experience here is obviously based on you being very committed to toronto saint paul's

00:30:44 is there an extrapolation that you could do or plan to do with this beyond because

00:30:49 well not every riding is going to have the jewish population of toronto saint paul's

00:30:53 the anti-Semitism issue is still pervasive very much across the country.

00:30:58 Absolutely. You know, I think that the community was very upset, very mobilized by what we were

00:31:07 seeing on our streets. And I think, not to be overly cynical, but, you know, the Jewish community

00:31:13 is only a large community in a small number of ridings, and that there may have been a political

00:31:17 calculation done by the government that, well, if we're very forceful in support of Israel,

00:31:22 then maybe there are other ridings that we will upset where you know there are different communities

00:31:28 who react differently so that's why i felt it was important for our community to have a voice and

00:31:34 to be able to speak out about the issues that are important to us where you know unfortunately just

00:31:40 by numbers that that might not always have the opportunity or might not always resonate or may

00:31:44 not always find an audience so we need to be a little a little stronger uh together absolutely

00:31:50 do i think that there unfortunately is a growing need for this not less and how that you know

00:31:56 goes going forward i'm not sure but this issue still remains that we are seeing rising anti-semitism

00:32:03 we are seeing on our streets we can debate the the criminal code definitions of hate but

00:32:09 intimidation of this community of my community of our community in our neighborhoods it seems like

00:32:15 daily if not at least weekly these these incidents are happening so until we see change we're gonna

00:32:21 need all the voices out there calling for it now this isn't just uh you know a website with you

00:32:26 know some lofty goals this was actually a campaign and third-party advertising can sometimes get a

00:32:33 bit of a bad rap but it's a part of the democratic process and there are a bunch of rules governing

00:32:37 how it's supposed to go about so i'll go to you steven because i know you've been in the trenches

00:32:41 on a lot of political fights over the years.

00:32:42 What were you tactically doing with this?

00:32:45 And how do you think that you actually did move the needle in the riding?

00:32:50 Yeah, well, being a by-election, we were quite limited by Elections Canada

00:32:54 and sort of the scope of what we could do.

00:32:56 I mean, if you're running a federal campaign,

00:32:59 third parties have much larger budgets that they're allowed to spend.

00:33:03 But I think in this by-election, Elections Canada had us at a cap

00:33:07 of about just over $5,000.

00:33:09 dollars. And so we wanted to make sure that every dollar that we spent on advertising in the

00:33:16 campaign was most effective. So we targeted, it was the first local election campaign where

00:33:25 when I targeted ads, I targeted less than the whole riding geographically. So targeted basically

00:33:32 the blocks with high Jewish population to remind them of the failures of the Trudeau government 1.00

00:33:42 with respect to addressing the concerns of the community. And we focused all of our resources

00:33:49 essentially in that area. And while the cost to reach such a small area might have been a little

00:33:56 higher. We think that the dollars spent on advertising to that very small. You talk about

00:34:03 microcasting, microcasting to a few blocks for GOTV is intense when it comes to online digital

00:34:12 advertising. And were you, with your targeting efforts, and I know that Facebook and other

00:34:18 platforms have changed what you can do over the years, but were you trying to target people you

00:34:22 believed were Jews in St. Paul's? Or were you just targeting anyone in that riding, knowing that

00:34:27 it was going to have a disproportionately larger group of Jewish voters than other parts of the

00:34:31 country might? No, there was no demographic targeting. It was geographic targeting. So we

00:34:36 really just kind of dropped a pin on the map and said, you know, higher likelihood that, you know,

00:34:43 Jewish individuals and Jewish families live here. So we wanted to get them out to vote

00:34:48 because we knew that that would register quite a message and a verdict against the government

00:34:56 with respect to its dealings since the events of October 7th. Yeah. And if I can add kind of

00:35:02 Jewish allies, it's not, you don't have to be Jewish. And we were saying that the Jewish

00:35:06 community was not feeling safe. And our message was no safe seats until the Jewish community feels 1.00

00:35:12 safe. Your neighbors are not okay. Your Jewish friends are not okay. And this is a way to show 1.00

00:35:16 some support for the community. And I also want to say, as a former candidate, all credit should

00:35:22 go to Don Stewart and his team and the amazing, incredible work that they did in the by-election

00:35:28 to get turnout and all those things. We were doing our kind of separate thing. I don't want

00:35:33 to take anything away from all they did, but just to say that what motivated kind of me and us,

00:35:40 and ultimately I think a lot of people in the riding, was this issue. And we felt that by

00:35:45 shining a light on it and kind of raising awareness of the by-election you know when

00:35:49 people by elections come and go by elections in the summer a big concern that people would know

00:35:53 about it that that we could raise some awareness and say this is an issue that's important you

00:35:57 passionate to you and support for your neighbors in the community this is an opportunity to raise

00:36:03 to raise that concern and to you know to vote accordingly and you know we'll see what comes

00:36:09 back but i you know i hope i hope uh we had an impact andrew you mentioned that uh could this

00:36:17 campaign essentially extend beyond this election in sort of other facets well we we're still taking

00:36:24 uh signups on the website so if you want to go to jewishally.ca and uh sign up and sort of be a

00:36:29 member of uh of our movement uh please go ahead and again it's for the jewish community and their

00:36:35 allies so uh we're we're casting a large net to essentially put out a verdict against uh you know

00:36:43 not just the trudeau government but any any sort of government's um you know failures to address

00:36:48 the concerns of the jewish community getting aside from the political dimension of this for

00:36:53 a moment i wanted to ask you andrew just on a personal note as a you know as a jew in toronto

00:36:57 saint paul's as a jew in canada right now you have seen antisemitism and i mean in your past

00:37:04 life working with CSIS. I know you had to sit down and talk to people that would have, if they knew

00:37:09 your background, would have hated you for it. And you talk about that in your book. I think it was

00:37:14 one case in particular. So you're aware of this, but do you feel that pre-October 7th others were

00:37:21 as well? Or do you think that it was something that was only really or has only really been

00:37:25 reckoned with in a substantive way in the last nine months? I have had a unique view and insight

00:37:33 into the threats that we face, the Jewish community faces, you know, here and abroad,

00:37:38 you know, in my role with CSIS, seeing down with folks investigating threats to the Jewish

00:37:43 community or threats to Canada that arise because of, or antisemitism being a part of that threat

00:37:48 landscape. So yeah, I've absolutely seen it up front in a way that many haven't. I think the

00:37:54 events of October 7th were very, I don't know what the word is, I don't want to say clarifying,

00:37:59 but we saw a horrific attack, the worst attack against Jews since the Holocaust. And the response

00:38:05 online was protests against Israel and protests against the Jewish community and, you know,

00:38:11 social media, you know, calling, calling things out. And I think the community was surprised,

00:38:16 but aghast or just, you know, the reaction and then the lack of support that came forward

00:38:22 to support the Jewish community from our leaders and people who we look to

00:38:26 for that support and defense i think was also shocking to many because of my background as i

00:38:32 said i sent my kids a jewish day school if you remember very early on there was the there was

00:38:36 the uh the day of rage that they they wanted to organize and people were very concerned and i got

00:38:41 i get phone calls from parents saying should i send my kids to school i'm worried about sending

00:38:44 my kids to school chat was just outside the neighborhood um you know they are having bomb

00:38:49 threats they've been evacuated a few times and so i said because of my background people call

00:38:55 me up and ask me for advice what do i do with my home do i take down my mezuzah what are we

00:39:00 going to do about these protests and the funding that's coming in that's supporting these things

00:39:05 many phone calls i'm on where the people on the other end are crying and they just say i don't

00:39:10 feel safe i'm not okay and i don't know what to do um and and as i said uh that feeling is out

00:39:17 there if people do not understand or uh aren't aware or the depths of it i'm telling you your

00:39:23 the Jewish community is not okay. And if this can be a wake-up call for more support, geez, I hope 1.00

00:39:29 that's what it is and that we will see it. Because I'll tell you, it is not politically,

00:39:36 like it's not a right, left, center thing. There are many people in Toronto, St. Paul's will bear

00:39:42 that out on the left who also feel abandoned by their leaders. So yeah, I think October 7th was

00:39:49 a wake-up call. I think the protests we've seen since is a wake-up call. And the fact that we're

00:39:55 looking around saying, well, is this okay with everybody? Why is this not being condemned?

00:40:02 Why are people that I thought were my friends and neighbors kind of supporting it? That has been

00:40:09 a wake-up call, I think, to many. So I have to put you both on the spot here as we close.

00:40:14 without jewishally.ca does don stewart still win

00:40:18 yeah look i i i think so i i don't know like i don't know um it's a narrow race it's it's it's

00:40:28 in a narrow race i think anything anything can count so it's it is very tough and and see i

00:40:34 don't even will kill me in his you know you gotta say yeah i know steven's just like

00:40:38 let me just rescue andrew here for a second i've been a candidate and they had a lot hard fought

00:40:47 he was out there knock on doors in the sun you know the team is out working hard putting everything

00:40:52 that happened to it they deserve all the credit in the world um so this is what i'll say and i'll

00:40:58 turn it over if we were able to support them in any way raise awareness for what they were doing

00:41:02 uh i i hope that we did that um and also for this effect of liberal voters but i don't want

00:41:09 to take any credit away from the candidate having been one by having been one myself

00:41:12 yeah well let's just say the the right well the the answer is that every vote counts and every

00:41:19 effort in an election counts and um so uh whether we were able to nudge uh people in one direction

00:41:28 or the other um i think we did so and i think that um yeah that certainly had an effect you

00:41:35 know might have actually tipped uh some liberal voters to vote ndp uh i would discuss uh if they

00:41:41 were somehow misinformed uh as to the what they what the what the right answer was so yeah um

00:41:47 no i do think that like our effort was certainly um focused and pronounced and i think that uh yeah

00:41:54 every effort in an election counts whether you're knocking on doors or you're handing out literature

00:42:00 or you're making phone calls or um you're you're running ads and i will fully concede with a semi

00:42:08 apology to andrew and stephen that it's a very unfair question because the whole point of an

00:42:11 election is that you do everything for your 36 days your 40 days your 60 days and you really

00:42:17 don't know what worked and what didn't you know i think it's tony clement that has a story about

00:42:23 you know canvassing this one part of the riding that was very difficult to get to and it was hilly

00:42:28 and no one ever canvassed there and you know he won by like you know 12 votes or something like

00:42:33 that and you know that's the story and it's a great story and you know maybe it was that canvas

00:42:37 that did it or maybe it was something else that did it but i think you're right steven that there

00:42:40 are a lot of different inputs there are different things that alert people there are different

00:42:44 things that motivate people and your your campaign i think you can both agree was definitely a part

00:42:48 of that it was a part of what voters in that riding were being hit with on again on any given

00:42:52 day yeah well i'll just uh give give some uh advertising facts on sort of what we were able

00:42:57 to do we we targeted a very limited uh number of people as i mentioned earlier we did reach

00:43:04 uh 32 000 people in the riding uh over five times uh during the um the advanced polling period and

00:43:13 And the, you know, the day or two before Election Day.

00:43:19 So, I mean, those metrics are indisputable.

00:43:23 We did reach that many people with a message that said,

00:43:26 send Trudeau a message that he's failed the Jewish community

00:43:30 and that you won't be silent.

00:43:34 And I'll just, I'll give you the last word on this, Andrew,

00:43:38 just because you're obviously the brainchild of this,

00:43:40 as Stephen was very gracious to point out as well when he and I were chatting about this before.

00:43:45 But what would you like to see as the next step, not just for this campaign, but for others that

00:43:51 are watching this that might be saying, yeah, you know, I could make a difference without

00:43:54 necessarily being a candidate myself? Yeah, I think the most impressive thing is that people

00:44:00 turned out. It's a by-election where everybody was thinking we're going to see 20% and low

00:44:04 voter turnout, and we saw 44% in a by-election in June, right? And I think that was... So I hope

00:44:13 we raised some awareness about what was going on, although, my goodness, the by-election ended up

00:44:17 getting a lot of coverage before and during and after. But yeah, get involved. Like, this is a

00:44:22 democracy. It's important. We could talk foreign interference and strengthening democracy the other

00:44:28 time. But this is an opportunity for our community to have a very unique opportunity to have an

00:44:35 outsized impact on the conversation, on a possible result. In a national campaign, many issues are

00:44:43 able to take over. You don't know which way they're going to go. Well, in Toronto St. Paul's,

00:44:48 we want to raise this one, and hopefully it's on the agenda that the government and other

00:44:53 political parties are all taking the concerns to heart and will act appropriately to say,

00:45:00 okay, well, maybe we haven't done enough. Maybe we need to do more. Maybe the people need more

00:45:04 support. So I hope that's what comes of it. And yeah, it's been interesting to see. Kind of a

00:45:10 first time for me to try to do this. And Stephen, obviously, thank you for his support. I thank

00:45:15 everybody for their support. You know, it's a Jewish ally, it's Jews and Jewish allies and

00:45:21 people who are concerned and want to support the community so thank you uh thank you all for your

00:45:26 support andrew kirsch stephen taylor the men behind jewishally.ca and also unrelated to this

00:45:34 you should definitely check out andrew's book i was never here a great glimpse into uh the life

00:45:39 of a cesus intelligence officer very it's the good kind of canadian content because there are

00:45:44 lots of like american spy stories and i think you're like the first uh canadian spy story

00:45:49 certainly writing it in that way. So Andrew, Stephen, well done on this campaign and good

00:45:53 to talk to you both. Thanks for coming on. Thank you. Thank you. All right. That does it for us

00:45:59 for today. We'll be back with more of Canada's Most Irreverent Talk Show tomorrow, doing a deep

00:46:03 dive into Alberta's relationship with Ottawa, with Rebecca Schultz. That'll be tomorrow. But

00:46:09 in the meantime, thank you. God bless and good day to you all. Thanks for listening to The Andrew

00:46:13 Support the program by donating to True North at www.tnc.news.

00:46:43 We'll be right back.

00:47:13 We'll see you next time.

`witch hunt`	Both words, anywhere in the episode.
`"witch hunt"`	The exact phrase.
`witch OR hunt`	Either word.
`"alpha male" -"high value"`	The first phrase, but not the second.
`(feminist OR feminism) AND (marriage OR divorce)`	Parentheses group alternatives.
`"decline civilization"~5`	Both words within 5 words of each other.

`misogyn*`	Any word starting with "misogyn": misogyny, misogynist, misogynistic…
`feminizm~1`	Words one letter off: catches typos and transcription errors.

`person:"Andrew Tate"`	Episodes where they host, guest, or are mentioned.
`host:"Glenn Beck"`	Episodes they host.
`guest:"Jordan Peterson"`	Episodes they appear on as a guest.
`mentioned:"Andrew Tate" -host:"Andrew Tate"`	Talked about on other people's shows.
`show:"Bannon's War Room"`	Episodes from one show.

`topics:abortion`	Episodes tagged with a topic (see the Topics page).
`summary:"Andrew Tate"`	Words in the episode summary. Summaries are machine-written and can be wrong.

`"great replacement" AND episode_date:[NOW-1YEAR TO NOW]`	From the past 12 months.
`lockdown AND episode_date:[2020-01-01T00:00:00Z TO 2020-12-31T23:59:59Z]`	From one year. Dates need the full time, as shown.
`"high value" AND misogyny_count:[100 TO *]`	Episodes with 100 or more sentences flagged as misogynistic. Also: hate_speech_count, toxicity_count, word_count.

Juno News - June 26, 2024

Liberal ministers rally behind Justin Trudeau

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript