Liberal MP “reflecting” on future with party after anti-Israel motion passes
Episode Stats
Words per minute
186.29327
Harmful content
Hate speech
9
sentences flagged
Summary
In the wake of the House of Commons vote on recognizing a Palestinian state, what does it mean for the future of the pro-Israel movement in Canada? What does it say about Canada s commitment to peace with Israel, and what role does it play in the current state of relations with the Jewish people, and does it delegitimize the right of Canadian Jews to live in their ancestral homeland?
Transcript
00:00:00.000
imagine you saw the emotion you heard the emotion in Anthony Howe's father as he gave those remarks
00:00:06.140
he sat down and then everyone around him pretty much voted against him voted against him and I
00:00:13.400
mean that they voted against him as a Jew they voted against him as a member of the liberal
00:00:17.980
party with a conscience on the question of Israel and what the Jewish community in this
00:00:22.580
nation is facing and I wanted to share another clip of him in the house of commons foyer in which
00:00:29.440
he seems to be very well aware of what happened after he sat down and MPs voted is this the first
00:00:37.700
time you're actually kind of reflecting on your role within this party I mean this has been going
00:00:41.860
on for a number of months now there's been tension to Canada rising in 1970s and you've seen your
00:00:46.100
government struggle to sometimes or you know come up with a position that satisfies everybody and
00:00:51.880
you've kind of been at the forefront of this but is this the first time you're actually kind of
00:00:55.000
reflecting on your future here I think it's the first time in my parliamentary career that I've
00:01:01.760
had a reflection like this where I truly felt last night that a line had been crossed when my party
00:01:10.720
members got up and cheered and give a standing ovation to Heather McPherson and the NDP I started
00:01:18.740
reflecting as to whether or not I belonged and I will let you know further how I feel over the
00:01:25.860
coming days for the moment I'm still there. That was a very strong language from someone who's
00:01:33.280
typically been a team player with his party joining me on the line now is Robert Walker who's the
00:01:38.300
assistant director for Honest Reporting Canada. Robert good to have you on the show here I mean we heard
00:01:44.440
that speech from Anthony House father in which he takes aim at what is one of the most I'd say
00:01:51.180
dishonest portrayals we see that that you could separate Zionism from Judaism and this is what we see
00:01:58.460
in a lot of the media coverage what we see in a lot of the protests I wanted to get your thoughts on
00:02:02.000
this. Well thank you Andrew for the for the question and for covering this because I think this is an
00:02:07.520
angle that this term this concept has been completely abused and and and bastardized uh by uh by the far
00:02:15.940
left and those who seek to demonize uh Israel and the Jewish people writ large which is we talk about
00:02:20.840
this indigenous movement is that Zionism is the indigenous movement of the Jewish people that the
00:02:26.440
you know this return to their ancestral homeland where they have lived for three millennia um practicing
00:02:32.120
the same faith speaking the same language walking in the same steps um but if you listen of course
0.79
00:02:37.140
to uh to you know ideological extremists today uh in Canada and indeed around the world um you know
00:02:43.520
they are this colonialist people who have invaded and kicked out the locals um and it's it's not just
00:02:50.380
an inversion of reality uh it is a moral outrage. And I mean one of the things that I I think is so
00:02:57.420
difficult here is that you have this language of colonial resistance that's being appropriated and applied
00:03:04.220
to what's happened in the Middle East and and parties like the NDP will wear their keffiyahs in the House of
00:03:10.320
Commons as they are are voting on this and and they they they pretend this is benign uh well it it certainly
00:03:17.800
isn't because I think what we've seen is is is not just the legitimization if you will uh of Hamas terrorism
00:03:25.340
and then that was a point pointed out by a number of um parliamentarians said that although the initial
00:03:32.040
extreme um motion as proposed by the NDP was a unilateral calling for the government to unilaterally
00:03:38.680
recognize the Palestinian state which of course anybody with a pair of eyes can look and say listen
00:03:42.760
if October 7th hadn't happened if Hamas's October 7th attacks hadn't happened then very clearly uh that
00:03:48.440
wouldn't have happened so it's very clearly uh a reward for terrorism and if you're sitting there
00:03:52.620
and you're a Hamas uh leader whether sitting on top of billions of dollars in Qatar uh whether you're
00:03:59.260
sitting underneath the tunnels of Gaza you're sitting there thinking my goodness you know the
00:04:03.800
more terrorism that we perpetrate uh the more legitimacy we get the more legitimacy we get and
00:04:08.780
the more credibility we get uh from uh from certain individuals in Canada and perhaps worst yet uh was
00:04:14.960
that this wasn't just you know voted on by the NDP but of course by the governing party of this country
00:04:21.720
the liberal party um and I think that sends a very very powerful message not just to Hamas but indeed
00:04:27.480
to Jewish Canadians and indeed to the majority of moral Canadians who look and say you know you're
00:04:32.280
allowed to have this is a free country and we have a diversity of opinion and you're allowed to
00:04:36.440
believe one thing or another but this legitimizes not just Hamas terrorism but indeed the scourge and
0.90
00:04:43.400
rise of anti-Jewish hate here which is of course not just a threat to Jewish Canadians but to any Canadians who
00:04:49.320
values uh the peace and security and order that we've come to value in this country and when we
00:04:56.280
have a government and when we have parliamentarians who vote in favor of a motion which glorifies and
00:05:02.840
which excuses Hamas terrorism uh that's that's an extraordinarily dangerous precedent well and then for
00:05:09.720
people that are not as people that don't spend their lives immersed in in this issue and pour over all
00:05:15.720
the coverage like certainly you do with your work and me to to some extent although I'd probably say
00:05:20.120
not as much as you do they they are easily duped uh by no fault of their own by certain language and
00:05:26.360
ceasefire I think is a great example of this because a ceasefire if you're just someone that doesn't
00:05:30.920
like that war is taking place this sounds like a very uh virtuous thing why is that not the case
00:05:37.560
well everybody wants in theory a ceasefire at one point the question is under what conditions
00:05:41.640
Hamas wants a ceasefire once the Jews are dead uh Israel wants to ceasefire of course once Hamas
0.87
00:05:47.000
is defeated and the hostages are returned so everybody's talking about a ceasefire but the
00:05:50.520
major issue that we see among those the extremists who talk about a ceasefire is very rarely uh that
00:05:58.120
really there's a lot of context here which is of course we want a ceasefire but a ceasefire that
00:06:02.120
keeps Hamas in power uh is ultimately nothing less than a capitulation I really I shudder to think of what
0.86
00:06:09.240
this dialogue would look like 80 years ago during World War II um you know people were talking about
00:06:14.920
facing this scourge of uh you know the Nazi uh Germany and saying well ceasefire ceasefire ultimately
0.82
00:06:21.080
uh I think of anybody who looks at you know the Hamas casualty numbers and there's a this was pointed
00:06:25.720
out last week uh by a statistician of the Wharton School who said that Hamas's numbers are essentially
00:06:30.920
statistically impossible uh that Hamas's numbers are fake uh that Israel takes steps unprecedented in
00:06:37.800
modern history to minimize civilian casualties and ultimately most importantly this war could
00:06:42.680
be over in five minutes if Hamas surrenders the hostages and uh surrenders its leaders and until
00:06:49.320
we have parliamentarians and protesters who refuse to call for that I think it's very clear that
00:06:55.080
anything short of that is ultimately a capitulation not just of Israel uh but every value that we as
0.78
00:07:00.600
Canadians hold uh hold dear um and I think that what we've seen from the demonstrations whether they're
00:07:06.760
blocking hospitals attacking synagogues blocking roads preventing uh g7 leaders from speaking
00:07:12.520
is that we can have a small minority of people and as long as they're loud they can have a bigger
00:07:17.800
impact than 10 million people who are quiet and I think this is perhaps the most chilling thing is
00:07:22.520
that a hundred loud people can have a greater voice than 10 million quiet people and this should be
00:07:27.240
really the uh the message for all of us is to say you know we I read on twitter and x and the comments
00:07:33.400
and people are angry and they're upset and they're saying listen even if we don't all have the same
00:07:37.320
view here how dare you try to you know you see the polls showing the liberals 15 20 points ahead people
00:07:43.480
are upset people are angry but rather than identifying and and addressing the issues that are of concern
00:07:49.240
to Canadians we have this kind of politics of division um and people can be upset but ultimately
00:07:55.640
unless we speak out and we demand better from elected officials from the news media who then give
00:08:01.160
uh unflattering pardon me flattering coverage to this kind of content ultimately we're going to
00:08:06.440
see more of the same the silent majority at some point needs to become the vocal majority uh otherwise
00:08:11.160
it really doesn't matter what uh with the majority thinking just I'd be remiss I'd be remiss to not
00:08:16.280
ask you as well Robert about this La Presse cartoon this morning that was published just I I don't I
00:08:22.280
don't even want to put the image up but it it depicted uh you know look editorial cartoons are never
00:08:26.920
flattering we know that but this depicted Netanyahu as a blood-sucking vampire which is itself an
00:08:34.280
old anti-semitic trope here uh and I I believe they've pulled the cartoon but only sort of in the
00:08:40.200
face of of backlash here but but my goodness this is I mean you'd never see uh this level of stereotype
00:08:47.240
in a cartoon on any other group in Canadian media no and nor should you I mean this cartoon of course
00:08:53.560
borrowed from uh the 19 1922 silent German film which uh extremely anti-semitic certainly in
00:08:59.560
commentators today uh depicted Jews as first of all as a stereotypical you know hook-nosed Jew uh
00:09:06.440
depicted uh Jews as being carriers of disease uh as uh bloodsuckers of uh virtuous young Christian
1.00
00:09:13.560
children um so this is and of course this is imagery that was gladly and enthusiastically then uh
00:09:18.360
mimicked and taken by the Nazis um so it's not only that we had this columnist decide to use this
00:09:25.000
imagery a then he uses it to depict perhaps the most famous or the most prominent Jew in the world
00:09:31.720
the prime minister of the world's only Jewish state that's crazy enough but then at what point did the
0.70
00:09:37.640
leadership of La Presse a prominent French language newspaper see no problem with this whatsoever so at
00:09:43.880
best case scenario we have here profound ignorance which honestly beggars belief is how these people
00:09:49.720
were in journalism at all um that's one and that's best case scenario worst case scenario was the embrace
00:09:55.960
of vocal uh Nazi-like right caricature of Jews I mean it's it's just it's obscene here and it's it's akin
00:10:03.240
to sort of describing um you know any other group uh with the kind of cartoons that we would expect uh
00:10:10.120
you know would would remain in the dustbin of history and so it's great that they've removed
00:10:13.720
it but honestly it's like whack-a-mole here and I think the more that we see the legitimization
00:10:18.440
um of anti-semitism or really the excusal of it when politicians stay quiet news media organizations
00:10:24.440
stay quiet it becomes normalized it becomes excused and it becomes um really normalized because those who
00:10:32.040
seek to propagate this kind of stuff become emboldened uh whether it's putting out anti-semitic
00:10:37.240
cartoons whether it's blocking roads synagogues highway overpasses or whether it's passing uh
00:10:42.920
legislation or motions in the house of commons which are a one-sided defamation of a democratic
00:10:48.120
country all while downplaying really uh a genocidal islamic terrorist organization so I think that we
0.77
00:10:54.280
as a society you know we hear from our prime minister that this isn't who canadians are but
00:10:58.280
ultimately we're seeing that that's exactly what canadian canadians are and what canada is and I think
00:11:02.520
that's high time five months ago was high time but now uh that the silent majority speak out and
00:11:07.960
really say absolutely no more this absolutely cannot continue a day longer very well said
00:11:13.560
robert walker associate director of honest reporting canada thank you for uh coming on
00:11:17.800
thanks andrew thanks for listening to the andrew lawton show support the program by donating to true north