Juno News - December 10, 2025


Liberals want to control what you watch online


Episode Stats

Length

26 minutes

Words per Minute

162.05013

Word Count

4,222

Sentence Count

232

Hate Speech Sentences

1


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

If you can't trust what you're hearing from journalists and your news media sources, then how are you supposed to hold the government to account? How can you actually energize your neighbourhood to get out there and doorknock if you don't trust the information you're getting?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Welcome to The Fighter with Chris Sims. I am Chris Sims. I'm the Alberta Director for the
00:00:11.580 Canadian Taxpayers Federation. We're always fighting for things like lower taxes, less
00:00:17.040 waste, and more accountable government. That last part I mentioned is super important when
00:00:22.300 it comes to our discussion today. Wait, first, if you haven't done so yet, could you please
00:00:26.720 do me a big favor, like this video, subscribe to the channel, and share it with your friends.
00:00:32.180 Okay, getting back to the point here. If you can't trust what you're hearing from journalists
00:00:38.800 and your news media sources, then how are you supposed to hold the government to account?
00:00:45.400 How are you supposed to write to your MP? How are you supposed to make an informed decision
00:00:50.040 when it comes to the next election? How can you actually energize your neighborhood to get out
00:00:55.040 there and doorknock if you can't trust the information you're getting, which leads us
00:01:00.000 to the critical importance of journalism and censorship in Canada. In Canada, the government
00:01:08.460 is tightening a vice on us. The vice from back in shop class, okay, it's attached to your workbench,
00:01:15.620 and you spin it and spin it and spin it as it gets closer and closer and closer and tighter and tighter.
00:01:20.260 On one side of this vice is the fact that journalists are being paid by the government.
00:01:27.360 I know, even 10 years ago, say 15 years ago, 15 years ago, this would have been unthinkable.
00:01:34.680 If you had approached any of my old salty news editors and said, hey boss, we should go on the
00:01:40.260 government dole. We as a newspaper or a radio station or a TV station, we should be funded by
00:01:46.100 the government. He would have laughed me out of the room and said, go cover traffic, go get some work
00:01:52.200 done, go find a story. But now it's become the norm that huge chunks of the mainstream media in Canada,
00:02:01.620 outside of the CBC, huge chunks of the mainstream media are paid by the government. It's wild.
00:02:10.100 The great researchers and journalists at BlackLock's Reporter, who are not funded by the government,
00:02:16.520 they're estimating that per media company employee now, if you layer in all the funding and subsidies
00:02:23.180 and tax credits and all that stuff, it adds up to around $27,000 or $30,000 per employee.
00:02:32.480 That is astonishing. So we've got government funded media on one side of this vice. On the other side of this vice
00:02:41.780 is censorship. Okay. Government controlling what you can hear, see and share online. Now, of course, that
00:02:53.260 government censorship usually shows up in a velvet glove. It's only to make sure that you're getting
00:02:59.460 Canadian content, and you're listening only to Anne Murray, and you're only eating beaver tails with
00:03:06.280 maple syrup on it. It's all for Canadian content, folks. What about the unintended consequences, making
00:03:13.280 it so that you can't actually find that fire brandy type podcast that you really like listening to?
00:03:20.840 What happens if all of a sudden, that independent media organization that you trust is super hard to
00:03:28.040 find in your streaming services? Isn't that a form of government censorship? Isn't that then
00:03:35.020 repressing information? This last part is super critical, especially for those of us here at the
00:03:41.140 Canadian Taxpayers Federation, because one of our mandates is to hold government to account.
00:03:48.860 Well, if you have this ever tightening vice of the government paying mainstream media on one side of
00:03:56.080 things, and government censorship suppressing information, probably that's critical of
00:04:02.600 government, okay, on the other side, how are you supposed to know what the government is doing
00:04:09.440 with your money? What the government is doing with the firearms confiscation? How are you supposed to
00:04:16.520 know? That's why it is so important that everyone, it doesn't matter actually if you like, if you prefer to
00:04:24.800 listen to more left-wing organizations, hey man, if you want to listen to Canada Land, okay, fill your
00:04:30.140 boots. They do some serious documentary work. We'd prefer you, of course, to watch things like Juno News
00:04:35.940 and to follow the Taxpayers Federation, to watch Rebel, all those independent media. But you know what?
00:04:41.320 What fundamentally matters is a free press. And free press means free from government control,
00:04:51.140 influence, and funding. What's going to happen going forward when it comes to things like podcasts and
00:05:00.080 independent news media, programs that you're probably watching right now, on some form of a streaming
00:05:07.120 service? Yeah, because the CRTC is coming out with some new regulations, and they're busy assuring everyone
00:05:15.200 that there's nothing to see here, folks. Which is usually a good indication that there's a lot to see.
00:05:20.840 What's going to happen going forward when it comes to these regulations? How is it going to affect your
00:05:25.780 ability to watch the programming you want? Let's find out. Now let's hear a word from our sponsor.
00:05:32.780 Folks, I want to take a minute to thank today's sponsor, which is Macamie College. So Macamie College
00:05:37.780 has an applied politics and public affair program. It's a two-year evening online program available across
00:05:44.660 Canada. Students have the opportunity to learn to run political campaigns, organize grassroots
00:05:48.720 movements, and push policy in the right direction. Students will also have hands-on placements in
00:05:54.000 their community or with the party they believe in. So when they graduate, they have real job-ready
00:05:58.980 experience. Applicants only need a high school diploma or homeschooling equivalent to apply intake
00:06:04.100 starts in September and January. And folks, we are very excited to announce that anyone who
00:06:09.560 who applies and is successful in enrollment will get a $500 scholarship from Juno News. So apply using
00:06:17.600 our link. It's in the description. You can go to candicemalcolm.com slash Macamie. That's M-A-K-A-M-I. 0.79
00:06:23.560 And if you apply through that link and you're successful, you get a $500 Juno News scholarship. You know,
00:06:30.240 I went to the University of Alberta and studied political science. And the thing you realize when
00:06:34.200 you're doing a university degree is that it doesn't lead you to a job. And so for me, after three years
00:06:39.140 of being a political science student, I looked around and realized I had no job skills. I had
00:06:44.420 never worked in politics. Everything was theoretical. It was all in the classroom. And I had to start
00:06:48.940 working on political campaigns just to get my foot in the door. The hard thing about politics is that
00:06:53.900 you need experience to get a job, but jobs require experience. And so doing something like this, I mean,
00:06:59.460 the fact that you can do it online, the fact that you can do it on the evening is really helpful. If
00:07:02.820 you're interested in politics and you're watching the show, I presume you are, this is something
00:07:06.000 that you really might want to consider, or hey, maybe, maybe one of your adult children
00:07:09.420 might be interested in doing something like this. So again, check out this link at
00:07:15.140 candicemalcolm.com slash Macamie College. I'm delighted to be joined now by Peter Menzies. He is,
00:07:21.120 of course, the former longtime editor of the Calgary Herald and the former vice chair of the CRTC.
00:07:27.140 And when I need an update or a check-in on the state of journalism in Canada, I go and read his
00:07:34.640 substack or I read him on X. So go check out both of those streams. Make sure you subscribe to Mr.
00:07:41.380 Menzies' substack. It is a wealth of information because even if you aren't a journalist, you want
00:07:47.860 to know what is going on with Canada and who's controlling the flow of information. Thank you so
00:07:53.380 much for joining me today. No problem. Always a pleasure. You and I were chatting back and forth
00:07:58.440 a little bit on the latest regulations coming out from the CRTC, which is, for lack of a better term,
00:08:05.960 kind of a wing of the government that regulates what you can hear and see typically on television
00:08:12.560 and radio. But nowadays, I guess they change the century and stuff on us. And we've got the internet
00:08:18.180 and we've got streaming services. A lot of people were telling me, Chris, don't worry about it. This
00:08:24.980 is not going to alter what you can see here and share online. Nothing to see here. This is just going
00:08:30.340 to put more maple syrup based shows on Netflix and on streaming services. What is your take on this?
00:08:37.380 It gets pretty complicated. First of all, the CRTC is supposed to be an independent administrative
00:08:45.780 tribunal. It's supposed to be arm's length, but as someone once told me, sometimes the arms can be
00:08:51.940 pretty short. So just to kind of keep that in for context. What the CRTC has done recently is come up
00:09:00.900 with a new definition of Canadian content, which seems to have satisfied most of the stakeholders being
00:09:06.500 involved. But in my view, it's just they've just done a good job of dividing up the pie.
00:09:13.540 My thoughts on it have always been that the concentration should be on growing the pie,
00:09:18.180 not necessarily just dividing it up, and that the pie should actually taste good and be appealing to
00:09:25.140 consumers, which is what ultimately all public bodies should be serving. That's not always the case with
00:09:32.180 some of the organizations. I don't think we're going to find out more in January when the CRTC comes
00:09:40.420 out with a sort of the second part of its decision. And that's going to be that's going to be more about
00:09:45.460 funding and or this most recent decision second part of this most recent decision funding and probably
00:09:52.820 what will be known as visibility of Canadian content within streaming services. And that means for some
00:10:00.500 reason or another, people haven't been satisfied with the your ability to go to the search tool and
00:10:06.260 type in Canadian. Because lots of Canadian content is on Netflix, for instance, and others if you just type
00:10:15.220 in Canadian and do that. So the problem is when you try to elevate one thing, you suppress something else.
00:10:22.820 So the things that you maybe don't like, will become more visible, could could become more visible
00:10:31.540 eventually on your screen. And the things that you do like, could be suppressed. And it gets pretty
00:10:38.580 complicated in terms of trade matters after that. So and probably inevitably, it means the cost of your
00:10:45.940 streaming services will go up. Are you at all concerned that something could happen similar to
00:10:52.100 what happened with Facebook? So still today, as we're recording this, if I wanted to try to share what
00:10:58.820 would be considered to be a news media link on Facebook on meta platforms, I would get this little pop
00:11:05.220 up saying, you know, due to government, blah, blah, blah, we can't do this. Now, for people who don't
00:11:11.300 know the background quickly, it started with the government. And originally, if I'm not mistaken,
00:11:16.660 it was the print guys that were saying, Hey, like, you know, we want a little bit of this money,
00:11:21.540 if you post a link to our work, we want to be compensated for it, etc. Then a whole bunch of other
00:11:26.420 media got involved, including the CBC, I will point out. And the government on behalf of said media
00:11:33.300 approached these companies like Google and Meta, and said, Hey, next time you post a link, you're
00:11:38.500 going to have to pay a fee. And Facebook said, No, thanks, we're not doing it anymore. So that is why
00:11:44.340 you can't see news on Facebook. Are you concerned, Peter, that some of these big companies will look
00:11:50.900 at the size, the small size of the Canadian market, and say this is not worth dealing with Canadian
00:11:57.460 bureaucracy in the CRTC. And we're just not going to offer our services.
00:12:01.620 Peter Robinson I think it's possible. I'm not
00:12:05.460 saying it's likely with the next one, because the CRTC may be conscious of that.
00:12:11.780 This is different dealing with streaming companies. For the CRTC traditionally is dealing with cable
00:12:16.580 companies and cable carried broadcasts and broadcasters and over the air, they had no place
00:12:21.780 to go. Whatever the CRTC's rules, whatever rules the CRTC came up with, they pretty much had to follow,
00:12:28.660 they had to adapt in some fashion or just quote business, but very few would do that. Streamers
00:12:34.100 can just leave. Yeah, the market is not that big. Now, Quebec is trying to do a similar
00:12:39.940 sort of streaming act of its own, which is just wild, right? I mean, they've actually just included
00:12:45.780 user generated content, for instance, within scope of their bill, which is bill C9, I believe. No,
00:12:55.700 sorry, 109, I think, in Quebec. So that's crazy, because they're focused on original French language
00:13:04.260 content, which means not dubbed. Like we can all go and, you know, choose which language we watch Netflix
00:13:10.580 or anything in the whatever, but that's not enough. They want original French language content.
00:13:17.140 I can't see BritBox hanging around for that, right? That's not what BritBox does, right? BritBox is,
00:13:26.900 you know, quiet English, you know, comedies, dramas, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
00:13:34.980 Well, Peter, if they just occupy Normandy again, they'll be able to manage all of this.
00:13:39.060 They'll just have French, British programming. It'll be fine. Right. And so there's a big
00:13:44.340 jurisdictional issue coming up there between Quebec and Quebec creating its own CRTC and the feds.
00:13:53.060 But if you go too far in any case, some of the companies can just look at it. Canada, frankly,
00:13:58.660 I mean, as an Anglophone market, it's still less than 35 million people. It's still, if you're worried,
00:14:07.540 as in the Facebook case, the Meta case, if you're worried that succumbing to Canada's
00:14:12.900 regulation is going to cause you a global problem, because these are global companies,
00:14:17.780 and that's really why Meta did it. Because if, if they didn't, if they went along with what Canada
00:14:23.060 was doing with news links, every country in the world was going to do it, right? Everybody was
00:14:27.940 watching Canada, right? And Canada was really proud. Everybody's watching us. And now everybody's looking
00:14:32.980 and saying, like, thank God, we're not Canada. And didn't get, didn't get suckered in, didn't get
00:14:38.180 suckered into that. So yeah, I mean, it's possible. I don't think it's likely, but with what Quebec's
00:14:46.980 coming up with right now, there will be pressure on the CRTC to sort of replicate it. So we'll have to
00:14:52.180 watch. Anything's possible. There was an element of the current and most recent CRTC ruling where they
00:14:59.460 specified, and I'm using layman's terms, that it wasn't user generated content. So say, you know,
00:15:06.180 Quick Dick McDick, or some other independent person, some commentator, Jasmine Lane was posting stuff on
00:15:13.380 YouTube, or posting stuff on, say, Spotify, okay, which is an online, as far as my definition would be,
00:15:20.580 that's an online streaming service, an online streaming platform, it's foreign owned, we listen
00:15:25.220 to podcasts using Spotify up here in Canada all the time. But they specified in one of the footnotes
00:15:32.020 that you and I were chatting about, where they said it's not individuals, but it's these hosting
00:15:37.540 programs. So things like YouTube, things like Spotify. My concern is that that could be interpreted as
00:15:45.860 the actual places where you see these podcasts could now come under CRTC regulation, meaning that
00:15:53.300 those independent journalists and those voices, those content creators, as we call them, could then
00:15:58.980 now be subject to all the rules and regulations of the CRTC. Now, I could be taking it too far. I was
00:16:06.020 with Sun News Network when it was shut down in 2015. So I've been burned. So maybe I'm reading too much into
00:16:12.420 this. Are you at all concerned that this could work as a de facto way of not seeing independent voices
00:16:19.940 or hearing more independent podcasts in Canada? Eventually, yeah, I think the Bill C-11, the Online
00:16:28.340 Streaming Act, the government insisted for the longest time when Pablo Rodriguez was heritage minister and
00:16:34.900 others that it didn't affect user generated content, even though if you looked at the bill,
00:16:40.340 it was right there. So some of us kept insisting, look, it's there, right? And it was very frustrating
00:16:47.780 because they were just gaslighting everybody and saying it's not there. After it passed,
00:16:55.300 they then actually acknowledged that it was there and created an order and counselor in the regs saying,
00:17:02.500 okay, this won't apply to user generated content. So it doesn't for now. And it only applies to
00:17:09.700 streaming companies that have more than 25 million dollars revenue in Canada. But it's in the legislation
00:17:18.740 and orders in council fade over time. And they can be taken away or people can just move on. Pressure can
00:17:26.420 build. Pressure can say, you know, this, this podcaster, that podcaster, they're out of control,
00:17:33.700 somebody has to do something about it. You know, I can remember Heady Fry saying years ago,
00:17:37.780 somebody's got to do something about the internet, people can say anything on there. Right?
00:17:41.780 I remember that. As if there was something wrong with people saying anything, right? I mean,
00:17:46.500 obviously, the laws still apply, and you can get sued and that sort of stuff. So it's not like it's
00:17:52.660 entirely Wild West or anything like that. But I think pressure will build eventually. And I think
00:17:57.780 you'll see what they'll do is they will not regulate the podcaster. They will regulate the carriers of
00:18:04.580 the podcasts and do so in a way that will cause those, the carriers, YouTube or Spotify or whatever,
00:18:13.780 to suppress certain podcasts and elevate others. That can certainly become the case with Canadian content.
00:18:22.020 I mean, Joe Rogan is the most listened to podcast in Canada. That's not Canadian content.
00:18:28.820 Canadian content proponents would probably like to see that change.
00:18:34.580 And it's so frustrating because in order for us to try to understand the world we live in,
00:18:40.740 and in particular, from the taxpayers perspective, what the government is going to do,
00:18:45.620 we need to be able to have free and open access to the media and news channels that we choose.
00:18:51.860 So for example, I listen to Ben Shapiro quite often, and he actually has quite a few insights into what's
00:18:58.340 happening in Canada. And some of his takes on things like tariffs, which are just trade taxes,
00:19:03.780 are spot on. He's been calling them trade taxes ever since Trump started imposing them. And we started
00:19:08.500 getting into this tariff war. And he's the one that hosted Alberta Premier Daniel Smith,
00:19:13.060 and that entire show was put on his show. And so you get these insights. But again,
00:19:17.700 I shouldn't have to be explaining my content choices and my listening preferences to the government,
00:19:23.220 ergo the CRTC. My concern is exactly what you just illustrated. Sure, they may not be going after
00:19:31.540 directly the content creator, right? That one person that's on YouTube that has a channel.
00:19:36.740 But if they go after YouTube itself, they could be less likely to platform and host a problematic
00:19:45.940 Canadian podcaster. I just see this as a direct route, as a way of form of censorship and at least
00:19:52.660 suppressing information. When's the next big hurdle? Is there something that people who are watching
00:19:57.940 this show, because they're definitely interested in this, is there something they can do to kind
00:20:02.900 of bend the ear and get them to move away from this? Not at this stage, because the input period for
00:20:11.860 the CRTC's latest decision closed. I mean, to be fair to them, the CRTC has spoken about how it wants to get
00:20:21.940 more input from the general public into these processes and that sort of stuff. But at the end
00:20:27.700 of the day, it's never well known, it's never well advertised that, you know, if you want to speak up
00:20:32.580 on the future of Canadian content right here, do this, do that. And frankly, the opposition parties
00:20:38.180 aren't very good at promoting it either. They sort of stay away from that, that sort of thing. So it ends up
00:20:44.580 being very low profile, until it's not. So the next decision will be the one, it's really the one where
00:20:52.900 the rubber hits the road, in terms of, because it's going to decide on the funding, and news will be
00:21:00.500 involved in more funding for news organizations, and the profile of Canadian content within streaming
00:21:08.420 companies. People I talk to sort of are expecting that, you know, middle of January, something like
00:21:18.260 that. It gets tricky, because if the CRTC is not supposed to think about these things, but it's
00:21:25.380 certainly aware of these things. And if they look like too much like they're beating up on the American
00:21:32.580 streaming companies, even though there's a cultural exemption in the free trade agreement with the US,
00:21:38.900 that doesn't mean that they won't retaliate. Yep. Right. So if they go too far,
00:21:46.340 and the Americans have been watching this very closely, and it looks like we're outsourcing all
00:21:51.860 of our cultural funding to the United States and expecting them to pay for it in the same way they
00:21:56.740 pay for military protection. It's another 10% on steel, like it wouldn't be within that sort of thing,
00:22:06.580 or Trump has talked about, you know, wanting 100% tariff on movies not made in the States. Well,
00:22:14.740 I don't think it's practical to do that, because how you would define that. But you know, in Alberta,
00:22:20.420 Canada and Ontario and Toronto and Vancouver, for sure, and other parts of Canada, making American
00:22:28.260 movies and TV series is a big part of the industry. It is. It is. There's a cop show I watched that's
00:22:36.820 supposedly in Boston, but it's clearly filmed in Toronto. It happens all the time.
00:22:41.460 Yeah. I mean, The Last of Us was the big hit that was worth about $150 million for Alberta.
00:22:47.860 Yeah, they included a shot of the bridge here in Lethbridge that was, you know, hanging there,
00:22:52.020 half burnt. I wanted to wrap up with this one element then. I will point out quickly that I
00:22:58.660 subscribed to the CRTC's updates, their emails of like, you know, oh, we're doing this and our
00:23:04.020 decision's coming up on this and that sort of thing. I went back through my emails. It might be there,
00:23:09.140 but I don't remember a big blasty email saying, everybody come tell us what you think about Canadian
00:23:14.340 content. It wasn't there as far as I could see it. So to your point, it's very kind of under the radar.
00:23:22.260 Only those in the know who are part of the industry, it seems, and within the mainstream media little set
00:23:28.260 seem to be able to give their input to this, which is again, raising my alarm bells. Peter, what can
00:23:36.020 people do that is practical right now? Should they still voice their concerns with their member of
00:23:41.060 parliament saying something like we want more free and easy access to the information and entertainment
00:23:46.100 we choose? Yeah, excuse me. Yes. Yes, they should. Because I don't think the official opposition or
00:23:52.020 the unofficial oppositions do a very good job of keeping an eye on these things. I mean, when I was
00:23:58.820 living in Ottawa and working at the CRTC, I was amazed at how little people knew about what was going on
00:24:05.380 there or other institutions like that. Everybody's so focused on the daily question period and that
00:24:10.980 sort of stuff, they can't see the forest for the trees and essentially. So they should be keeping
00:24:16.260 their local MP aware. They should be watching for this decision coming up. They should be asking that
00:24:23.780 their media keep an eye out for it too and keep an eye on that because practically, it will make a
00:24:31.540 difference. Like, I mean, there's no point in the CRTC doing anything if it's not going to make a
00:24:36.420 difference, right? Because people are expecting it to make a difference. Whether it makes a good
00:24:41.300 difference or a bad difference is really the issue. It's possible it can make no difference, right? It
00:24:48.980 might get cold feet on the issue and try to smooth it through so that they don't make Donald Trump any
00:24:56.100 grumpier than he already is. Yes, let's avoid that. Peter Menzies, thank you so much for your time
00:25:01.140 today. We appreciate it. Always a pleasure. Thank you. Once again, that is Peter Menzies. He is the
00:25:07.220 former editor of the Calgary Herald. He has been a journalist for decades and he was the vice chair
00:25:14.020 of the CRTC and thankfully he is keeping up on everything. Go check out his channel on X, formerly
00:25:22.180 known as Twitter, and go check out his sub stack. Subscribe to it if you can because he is always talking to the
00:25:29.860 news makers, especially when it comes to how we get information in Canada. Because remember,
00:25:37.460 if you can't get access to information, you can't hold the government to account. Speaking of
00:25:42.580 independent journalism, be sure to head on over to Juneau News. Subscribe to Juneau News. They are not
00:25:48.100 funded by the government, which is true journalism. Thank you so much for joining us and be sure to share
00:25:53.620 the show with people who need to know.