ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- December 10, 2024
Libs wanting to STEAL your firearms for Ukraine is nothing but PROPAGANDA
Episode Stats
Length
21 minutes
Words per Minute
185.20645
Word Count
3,977
Sentence Count
213
Misogynist Sentences
2
Hate Speech Sentences
6
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
The Canadian federal government announced it's banning more types of firearms and wants to send
00:00:05.100
some of those guns to the Ukraine. In other words, the federal government is going to steal your
00:00:11.040
legally acquired property and redistribute it as they see fit, a practice best known around the
00:00:18.420
world as communism. I'm Rachel Parker, and you're watching The Rachel Parker Show.
00:00:30.000
Hey everyone, I'm Rachel Parker. Welcome back to The Rachel Parker Show. We have a lot to cover
00:00:45.500
with this latest big announcement from the liberal government announcing that hundreds of more types
00:00:50.800
of firearms will be banned, and they are claiming they are going to send these guns to the Ukraine.
00:00:54.600
Joining me today to discuss is Rod Giltaka, the CEO and Executive Director of the Canadian Coalition
00:01:01.360
for Firearms Rights. Rod, thank you so much for being here today. I'm wondering if you can just
00:01:06.000
start right off the hop by explaining, you know, hundreds of more firearms have been added to this
00:01:11.240
list of banned guns. What types of firearms are newly banned under this latest announcement?
00:01:17.860
Well, interestingly enough, it's the remainder of Centrefire semi-automatics that weren't banned back
00:01:23.880
in May 2020 and also weren't banned by the RCMP. Subsequent to that, the RCMP banned another eight
00:01:30.840
or nine hundred models after that original ban back in May 2020. And so there were still some firearms
00:01:38.200
left. In fact, the liberal government had bragged that there were still 29,000 models of firearms
00:01:44.880
available. You're not losing anything. Just go out and buy guns that aren't on the list.
00:01:50.000
So that's what Canadians did. People that owned those firearms that still wanted to compete or hunt
00:01:56.640
using those types of firearms went out and replaced them, basically trusting the ever trustworthy Trudeau
00:02:05.160
government for their word and then only for them to turn around a couple of days ago and ban basically
00:02:11.360
everything else. And there's a lot of Canadians that had spent two, three, ten thousand dollars
00:02:18.560
replacing these guns just so they could just be left alone and continue their lifestyle. And now the
00:02:23.520
government in a huge sweeping ban a few days ago banned the rest of those. So I don't I don't know.
00:02:29.680
And in fact, let me let me just add this. Sorry for going on. But I heard from a journalist that one of the
00:02:37.360
government officials had said, oh, don't worry, there's still 18,000 models left. So I don't know
00:02:44.560
if they think all this is funny, but but that's what they're up to. So it sounds like the additional
00:02:51.200
firearms that have been banned are primarily used in Canada in sport shooting and in hunting. And are
00:02:58.000
they also used in farming? In farming, like protecting livestock? Yeah, absolutely. They are.
00:03:05.360
And, you know, they're they're center centerfire semi-autos and a wide collection of 22 caliber
00:03:13.200
rifles, too. So, of course, it's a complete I don't know. I don't like inflammatory terms,
00:03:19.920
but it's total propaganda and manipulation to say that these are weapons of war used by soldiers to
00:03:25.040
kill other soldiers and we're going to send them off to to Ukraine. Well, yeah, it's it's it's it's
00:03:31.280
ridiculous. They're banning all semi-autos and anything that has a, you know, tactical look to
00:03:37.360
it based on based on appearance. So it's just it's it's a real slap in the face to public safety and
00:03:42.960
slap in the face to licensed gun owners. OK, so you touched on one of the craziest parts of that
00:03:49.920
announcement that bit about them saying, you know, these are weapons that are used in war and we are
00:03:54.160
actually going to steal your property and we're going to send it to Ukraine. They need the guns.
00:03:58.160
They need it to fight Russia. What do you make of that? Well, it's more it's more psychological
00:04:04.000
manipulation. This is the most manipulative, corrupt government in the history of the country
00:04:09.280
by far, by an enormous margin. And I, you know, I don't want to seem partisan by saying that it's just
00:04:15.360
demonstrably true. And with this government and in my experience, especially with Bill Blair,
00:04:20.400
I guess their idea is, you know, this is going to be very unpopular with a lot of people.
00:04:28.880
They're trying to this is a last ditch effort to try to help themselves out in the polls. I don't
00:04:33.680
think it's working. Their GST gimmick didn't work. And they're trying to pack all of the talking points
00:04:39.440
into one effort. So they're like, well, if you're against the gun ban, then you must be on the side of
00:04:45.360
Putin because we're going to be sending these 22s and and and semi-automatic rifles with barrels
00:04:51.840
that are way too long over to Ukraine to help, you know, fight the Russians. I mean, it's all
00:04:57.280
and to any to anyone that's not intellectually disabled, it is it is absurd. It's laughable. But,
00:05:05.040
you know, we still have 20 percent of the population voting for liberals. So it's I guess that's what they're
00:05:09.840
they're counting on. So it sounds like you're saying this bit about Ukraine is actually just
00:05:14.800
government propaganda and that Ukraine, in fact, does not want to use or will use these guns to
00:05:21.040
fight their war against Putin. Oh, of course not. Militaries have standardization for a reason.
00:05:27.520
All of their firearms, all their rifles are set up the same way. All of their ordinance is set up the
00:05:32.000
same way. All of it. Everything has to be consistent so you can pick up whatever off the ground,
00:05:36.960
if need be, and use it. So not going to be sending 22s, GSG-16s, a 22 caliber rifle,
00:05:43.360
and then send somebody's AR-15, a Daniel Defense AR-15 with a certain setup on it and then send them
00:05:50.320
some kind of Chinese Norinco AR-15, which we had available in Canada back in 2020. It's completely
00:05:56.320
ludicrous. It doesn't make it's not attached to reality whatsoever. And I think it's just another
00:06:01.600
example of the contempt that these people have for everyday Canadians. They're literally calling you
00:06:09.920
stupid, telling you the most absurd, crazy stuff, expecting you to believe it and prepare to cancel
00:06:16.800
you if you don't believe it. And I guess the good news, Rachel, is that Canadians are sick and tired
00:06:23.520
of it. No matter what the Conservatives do, they are soaring in the polls to, you know,
00:06:28.880
they're on their way for two years. They've been looking at super majority level performance in
00:06:35.120
the next election, despite everything that the Liberals are doing. And interestingly enough,
00:06:38.960
they keep doubling down. They keep lying more and they're wondering why it's not working. So it's a
00:06:43.920
real mess. Okay. So I want to take a step back and look at your legal challenges. I know that you guys
00:06:51.520
are in court all day today. You were in court all day yesterday fighting the original gun ban that was made
00:06:57.280
a few years back. Can you give me an update on that case? Well, today is our last day in the courtroom.
00:07:05.440
This is the federal appeals court that is having another look at the decision. So on our original
00:07:12.000
court case, we lost. Justice Kane came out with a very strange decision. Not a lot of legal reasoning
00:07:20.960
there, which is, I think it's unusual. I'm not a lawyer, but it's my understanding that that's quite
00:07:25.520
unusual. I can only speculate why. Anyway, and I don't want to speculate here because we have a
00:07:33.840
case still in the courts. We were given leave to take our case to the, to the federal court of appeal,
00:07:39.840
which it is in now right now. And we're hoping to have a decision. I don't know what they're,
00:07:45.040
we are completely helpless when it comes to the timeline. I would hope that it's in the next few
00:07:48.960
months and it's not three years, three and a half years or whatever it was as, as it was in the last
00:07:54.560
case. But basically if we're successful, the order in council back in May, 2020, and I believe
00:08:01.200
subsequent order in council, like the one a few days ago would be nullified as, as basically as
00:08:07.840
illegal. The government does not have, this is our contention, does not have the authority to ban guns
00:08:14.560
via an order in council. It has to do it through legislation because of something that's written
00:08:18.160
in the criminal code. So if we win, this stuff should go away. What that actually looks like,
00:08:24.400
I don't know. Cause I'm not sure that anybody knows, but we don't have to skin that cat when
00:08:29.040
we get to it. But, uh, but that's where we're at. To your point, if you were to win that this
00:08:34.160
latest order in council about the guns that they want to send to Ukraine would also be nullified.
00:08:38.720
If you were to lose, would you be able to put forward a new appeal for this latest order in
00:08:44.320
council? Or if you were to lose, would basically then the federal government have the right to ban
00:08:49.120
these weapons under the latest order in council as well? So if we, if we lose there, there's no
00:08:55.920
new case with that case, that, that legal question will have already been answered, but it depends
00:09:03.040
heavily on what the decision, how it's written, what the, what the decision is from the
00:09:08.720
appeals court. Because if the, if we believe that the appeals court has made a mistake, like we
00:09:13.120
believe that justice Cain did in our original case, then we will apply for leave to go to the
00:09:18.560
Supreme court of Canada. And we're prepared to go all the way because this has to be resisted on every
00:09:23.920
front forever until this is over. Now, as far as if we lose and the decision looks pretty conclusive,
00:09:33.280
we may not be given leave to go to the Supreme court. But regardless of that,
00:09:37.760
we have all kinds of other projects forming up right now to oppose this and to make sure
00:09:43.680
that the liberals not only lose the next election, because the conservatives really don't need help
00:09:47.920
from us to win the next election. We've done other things in the past, but we will make sure that we,
00:09:55.600
we do as much damage to the liberal party, the NDP and the Bloc Québécois for doing this to law
00:10:01.680
abiding Canadians that hopefully there is an overwhelming super majority conservative
00:10:06.480
government. And then they will have a chance to show that they really care about the difference
00:10:11.440
between right and wrong, not just winning elections or not winning elections.
00:10:15.280
I wonder if, and you know, you guys might not have moved on to this because I know you're in the
00:10:20.880
middle of this current legal challenge, but specifically, you know, you're saying we want
00:10:24.400
to do as much damage as possible, specifically on the fact that the government has said that they want
00:10:29.760
to steal these firearms and send them to Ukraine. I feel like there is almost something that could be
00:10:34.960
challenged in and of itself within that, because to me, it just feels it's so immoral. First of all,
00:10:39.520
that the government is essentially stealing, you know, Canadians legally acquired property that they had
00:10:44.240
to really jump through a bunch of hoops to get those firearms in the first place. And now they're
00:10:49.600
telling them, we're just gonna, we're just gonna steal them from you. We're actually sending them to
00:10:53.440
another country. Like that to me feels so immoral. And I wonder if something could be done on that
00:10:59.120
specifically. Well, if there's an opportunity to, to, to start another court case, we will find out
00:11:06.320
and we will do that. So there's, there's nothing that we won't do within legal means to oppose the
00:11:13.440
government, um, because it's, it's just, it's morally, it's, it's worse than wrong. It's just, it's, it's
00:11:20.480
been created. These are strange times. So we will fight them in the court of public opinion. We will
00:11:25.280
fight them in the courts and we will fight them politically. And we're never going to give up
00:11:29.680
right to the last day. What is your recommendation to firearms owners right now who are going to be
00:11:36.480
impacted by the bans? Okay. So there's a couple of things going on. Number one, I would recommend
00:11:42.880
that you write a letter to letters, to the prime minister, to the minister of public safety,
00:11:48.240
to bill Blair, telling him how ridiculous he is. That would be nice. Uh, that's more of an
00:11:52.000
entertainment thing, but, uh, obviously if you have a liberal MP, uh, write a strong worded letter
00:11:58.480
that says, this is absolutely morally wrong. It is reprehensible. You need to stop doing this
00:12:04.960
immediately, whatever, just let them it's that's not going to turn them around, but you know, let them
00:12:11.840
know that you will do everything in your power to make sure they never hold public office. Again,
00:12:16.080
you'll work for free for the opposition party or whatever, whatever you can come up with to let
00:12:21.120
them know how upset this is, uh, upsetting this is to you, make it short and also make sure that if
00:12:28.000
your MP is a conservative party MP, you send them a letter too, and let them know that you fully expect
00:12:34.480
them to roll back all of the bans. And then also that you want them to rewrite the, uh, the firearms act
00:12:42.480
to make it make sense, to make it have a demonstrable positive effect on public safety. And you are not
00:12:48.800
going to tolerate, uh, punitive, uh, imaginary gun laws, uh, just for political purposes that you want
00:12:55.600
them to take action because it's really important that they do that work as soon as they get in.
00:13:00.480
And the other thing, I just want to remind gun owners that the liberals are out of time. Okay. They do not
00:13:06.560
have time to take these guns from individuals, even if the election goes all the way to next October.
00:13:12.480
So it's highly likely that you will still have possession of these guns when they are gone.
00:13:18.320
So that's really important. So all is not lost yet, but we don't stop the fight. Um, so, you know,
00:13:25.680
while this is inconvenient, while it's frustrating and no one's probably nobody's as frustrated as I am,
00:13:31.440
I assure you, let's, let's just keep your eye on the prize, write those letters. More will be coming
00:13:38.320
from the CCFR. We have more plans that we're going to be rolling out within the next probably seven days.
00:13:43.040
So we'll have other ways that you can participate in pushing back against this as well.
00:13:48.160
Rod, I'm wondering a little bit about the long lasting impact of this, of this all. And in that
00:13:52.880
sense, I mean, you know, I have some friends who are firearms owners who are feeling really
00:13:57.040
frustrated by this, but I remember even when the first firearms ban was announced, um, I had a
00:14:02.240
couple of friends who they had put deposits down on, on new guns and essentially those guns ended up
00:14:07.360
being banned later on. And, you know, the manufacturers just sort of said, sorry, and,
00:14:11.760
you know, they lost their deposit, you know, like, is it going to become impossible for Canadians to get
00:14:16.560
the firearms that they want over time, even if this legislation is reversed by, or not legislation,
00:14:21.920
rather it's just an order in council, but even if that is, you know, found to be illegal,
00:14:26.240
or even if the next conservative government that we expect to likely happen decides to reverse it is,
00:14:31.760
is there going to be a situation where Canadians can't get their hands on the firearms they want
00:14:35.840
because this liberal government has really just driven out manufacturing for it?
00:14:40.960
Well, if we win this case, I expect the liberal government to try to do something else.
00:14:45.840
And I don't know exactly what that would be, but let's say we were to win this case and they're
00:14:50.320
like, okay, well, we're out of tricks right now. As I said earlier, we don't really know what
00:14:55.520
that looks like. It's like, okay, well, you can use all your guns. Can you take your AR-15 to the
00:15:00.560
range? Because that's the only place you could have shot it anyway. All of our registration
00:15:05.360
certificates were nullified. So I don't know whether that's, whether the firearms program needs to
00:15:10.560
reissue those, maybe the non-restricted, you can take them and use them for hunting and sport shooting
00:15:14.640
again. Anyway, we don't, we don't know exactly what that would look like.
00:15:20.400
But either way, I think if we get to the next election, all this gets rolled back, I think,
00:15:26.560
and this is just my opinion and some people do share it. We will see a resurgence of sport shooting
00:15:32.960
and of firearm ownership like we've never seen, because at least you would know if the conservatives
00:15:38.480
won a very clear majority, if not a super majority, you know that you're probably going to be safer.
00:15:44.800
Seven, six, seven, eight years, and that your life won't be destroyed by people trying to
00:15:50.320
create some kind of political wedge. So I think it's all going to come back quite,
00:15:55.040
quite, uh, quite virient, viriently. Um, and I think, uh, I think there'll be a lot of happiness
00:16:00.320
there. I think it'll be a really positive, um, a positive time and all of these sports will come
00:16:05.120
back and they'll probably expand. So I'm trying to stay positive because it's not easy to do that
00:16:09.840
under times like this, but I do think that things will turn around and, um, and the liberals are
00:16:15.040
going to look back and go, I don't know why we did any of that. We lost anyway. We lost the confidence
00:16:19.760
of Canadians. We made fools of ourselves and look at it now. That's, that's our goal for sure.
00:16:23.920
Okay. So you guys, you're fighting this stuff tooth and nail. How are you funding all these
00:16:29.840
lawsuits and other projects that you're working on? We are 100%, uh, funded by individual fire
00:16:36.800
owners and, uh, and like gun stores. There are no big gun manufacturers in Canada. It's funny because
00:16:42.800
our political adversaries call us, you know, the, the, uh, the gun manufacturing lobbies. Like, I don't
00:16:48.640
I'm not sure that we ever really got a donation from any sizable manufacturer because there's not
00:16:54.560
a lot of them in Canada, but we are a grassroots organization that is funded by individual gun
00:16:58.640
owners. And, and, uh, so, you know, this lawsuit that we're still, uh, that we're appealing, uh,
00:17:04.320
it's probably sitting up at around $2.5 million. No, no, uh, lawsuit of that size has ever been
00:17:10.480
launched or carried out by, uh, by gun group in Canadian history. It's, it's quite, uh, quite momentous. Um,
00:17:16.800
but again, we're, if people support us, we can do these big things. And, uh, yeah, that's,
00:17:22.560
that's how we're funded. Rod, thanks so much for your time today. Really appreciate it. Thank you.
00:17:27.360
All right. That was Rod Giltaka, the CEO and executive director of the Canadian Coalition
00:17:32.160
for Firearms Rights, a very informative interview. I'm curious, let me know in the comment section below,
00:17:38.160
where do you guys think this will go? Do you think that the Canadian Coalition for Firearms
00:17:44.080
Rights is going to win its challenge to have those ordering councils dropped, or do you think that they
00:17:51.200
will lose and that this will continue to carry on until we hopefully and likely see a conservative
00:17:57.200
government at least by October? All right, now I want to move into our comment section. I'm going to
00:18:03.760
take a look at some of your comments from last week's episode. Last week, I had Chris Sims, the Alberta
00:18:08.480
Director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, on to discuss her testimony at the Canadian Heritage
00:18:15.440
Committee as it looks at the validity of funding the CBC. Remember, Canadian taxpayers give the CBC
00:18:21.840
1.4 billion dollars. And of course, I had Kaylin Ford on. She is a former United Conservative Party
00:18:29.200
candidate who was ruthlessly slandered by the Alberta NDP and the media when she ran for the party back in
00:18:36.400
2019. After some text messages, some private text messages she had with someone she thought was a
00:18:41.760
friend were selectively edited to make her appear like a really horrible person, which if you saw her
00:18:47.280
on my show, you know that she's absolutely not. She is very intelligent, very thoughtful and articulate.
00:18:52.080
It was a great interview, and you guys certainly had thoughts on the interview. User at Jen Zable said,
00:18:57.840
this woman is deserving of high praise. An employer should be happy to employ a lady with such a strong
00:19:03.360
moral compass. Alberta NDP are a bunch of malicious bullies, corrupt. You're absolutely correct. And
00:19:08.480
I'm not sure if you guys all know this, but Kaylin Ford has actually been founding charter schools
00:19:12.480
around the province. I can't quite remember how many she has, but they had at least one in Calgary,
00:19:16.960
and they were looking to open one in Edmonton. I think that one is open now. And they are extremely
00:19:21.600
popular. I know that she said that there's huge wait lists both in Calgary and in Edmonton for the
00:19:26.480
charter schools. So the good news here is that she went on to do some really amazing things with her
00:19:32.240
life after being so ruthlessly slandered in the media. Barbara Drury said, what a run around this
00:19:39.200
poor woman has had. She deserves a lot of credit for persevering with this. User Dixie Beasley said,
00:19:45.280
heartbreaking story. Mrs. Ford is intelligent and inspiring. And then finally, user at Laissez-faire
00:19:52.400
said, this needs to be the norm. If someone accuses you of being racist, you should be able to soothe them
00:19:57.760
into oblivion. So yeah, just a couple thoughts here. I mean, it's very impressive that Kaylin
00:20:02.400
was able to persevere with all this, as you guys rightly noted. I don't know what it would have
00:20:07.120
done to me. I think it would be really difficult for anyone in that situation not to sort of just
00:20:12.240
wallow and fade into depression when your life is just ripped apart like that. And, you know,
00:20:16.960
people you know don't want to be associated with you any longer. That would be really difficult and
00:20:21.120
really glad to see that this is finally seeming to be coming out of the underside. Although,
00:20:24.880
obviously, she still has a long legal battle ahead of her. And then for this last bit about
00:20:30.400
being racist, I just feel like the meaning of the word racist is like completely lost. Like
00:20:34.880
nowadays, if you're conservative, you just kind of expect to be called a racist and it doesn't
00:20:39.200
mean anything because the word has not only been overused, but it's just been improperly used for
00:20:44.640
so long to the point that it has lost meaning. I do know, however, that if someone calls you a
00:20:49.920
Nazi and you're not in fact a Nazi, that you can successfully sue on that front. I've heard a couple
00:20:54.240
stories about that, but I think it might be harder to sue for being called a racist just because the
00:20:59.920
word has become so meaningless in the last few years. All right, everyone, that's all we have
00:21:05.040
time for today. Thank you so much for joining the show. Don't forget to let me know in the comment
00:21:08.560
section below what you think will happen with the CCFR's challenge. I will be back with some more
00:21:14.800
content for you guys tomorrow on Rachel in the Republic. Hope that you have a great week and God bless.
Link copied!