Juno News - May 17, 2023


Maxime Bernier wants to "reopen the abortion debate"

Topics
Mentioned
Parents concerned about trans ideology in Canadian classrooms Is Canada trying to ELIMINATE the Homeless?

Episode Stats


Length

20 minutes

Words per minute

168.63

Word count

3,418

Sentence count

260

Harmful content

Misogyny

6

sentences flagged

Toxicity

2

sentences flagged

Hate speech

7

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Maxime Bernier is running for a seat in the House of Commons in one of Canada's most conservative ridings, Portage-Lisker. In this episode, we discuss why he's running and why he thinks it's a good idea to ban abortion after six months of pregnancy.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 We are going to move to a local story, which I think is one that may have national implications
00:00:14.080 here. And that is the by-election in Portage-Lisker, which is one of the most conservative
00:00:20.500 ridings in Canada. And if you need evidence of that, you need not look further than the
00:00:25.960 results in the last few elections. It was previously held by Candace Bergen, who was up until recently
00:00:32.440 the interim leader of the Conservatives. And Candace Bergen, she, and I'm just pulling up the
00:00:38.120 numbers here, she won that riding in 2021 with 52%. But it also happened to be the strongest showing
00:00:44.280 for the People's Party of Canada in the last election, with the PPC candidate getting 21.58%
00:00:51.840 of the vote. Well, now that there is a by-election, we have a Conservative, Brandon Leslie, running,
00:00:58.280 but we also have Maxime Bernier, the leader of the People's Party of Canada, who has stepped
00:01:03.140 up to seek a seat in the House of Commons once again. And he joins me now. Maxime, good to talk
00:01:09.020 to you. Thanks for coming on the show today. Thank you, Andrew. I'm very pleased to be with
00:01:13.280 you. So obviously, you are not a Manitoban. Why are you choosing this riding to run in?
00:01:18.860 Because, like you said, it may be one of the most conservative riding in the country. And
00:01:25.660 I, like I said, the Conservative Party of Canada is a Conservative-only name. They're fake
00:01:31.580 conservative. And I will tackle the real conservative issues, family values. That's why today I said
00:01:38.260 to people here in Portage, this card, that, you know, if I'm elected, I will table a bill
00:01:43.220 on abortion. Can you believe that, Andrew? We don't have any legislation on abortion for
00:01:49.380 35 years. The Conservative did nothing the last 35 years. And I said, enough is enough.
00:01:56.060 We need to have a legislation that will forbid late-term abortion. And that was a discussion 0.99
00:02:02.420 of today. And it is in line with the values of the people here in this riding. But the
00:02:09.300 fake conservative won't speak about that. Actually, Poliev once said the word abortion is too afraid
00:02:15.820 of the mainstream media and also the radical leftist feminists. We are not. It's a common
00:02:22.700 sense political party. And that's why I'm running here. And it's a little bit like in Bose. In Bose,
00:02:29.420 it was a rural riding. It's a rural riding here. And I'm very pleased also that there's
00:02:34.500 a Francophone community here in Portage, this card. So I'm here. I'm running here. And I will
00:02:41.220 be with them before the election, during the election, and after the election.
00:02:45.340 Since you bring up the abortion issue, I wanted to get to that with you anyway. Let me just first
00:02:51.140 contextualize this for people. Are you pro-life or are you pro-choice?
00:02:54.420 You know, I'm a guy that wants to have a debate. And that's why I'm tabling that legislation.
00:03:02.300 I said we must do the first step, Andrew. We didn't have any legislation. We are the only
00:03:07.580 country, all the European countries have legislation on abortion. And usually, it's illegal to have
00:03:15.100 an abortion the second trimester. In my legislation, I'm saying we must end the late-term abortion. 0.86
00:03:22.560 It must be illegal for a woman to have an abortion after six months. And so I believe that every 0.99
00:03:31.080 reasonable person must agree with that. And I'm saying to Pierre Poliev right now at your
00:03:36.460 show, Pierre, why do you want on-board babies to be killed after six months of pregnancy?
00:03:44.400 Why? If you agree with me, why you don't want to reopen the debate?
00:03:49.620 And so answering your question, Andrew, I think that ideally, we must have a legislation that
00:03:56.200 will ban abortion the second trimester. Like all European countries and all across the world, 0.67
00:04:03.840 we don't have that. But let's start by having that discussion in parliament. And I believe
00:04:08.680 that it would be easy if we have reasonable people in parliament to adopt that. Because,
00:04:14.600 you know, killing a baby a couple of hours before giving birth, that's happening in our country.
00:04:20.040 And I know that the radical feminists will say, oh, no, no, it's terrible. It won't happen. 0.88
00:04:25.980 It is. I said this morning at my press conference, every year in Quebec, and I just have the data in
00:04:32.240 Quebec. The Quebec government, and in Quebec, we have late-term abortion, 20 women every year,
00:04:39.880 they are having a late-term abortion in my own province in Quebec. And so that's the case. And
00:04:46.240 we need to change that. We need to have this debate. And I'm opening that debate right now.
00:04:51.480 Yeah, but again, it was a pretty direct question. Are you pro-life or are you pro-choice, personally?
00:04:56.600 I would be very direct, Andrew. I won't answer your question. I won't. Because the reality is,
00:05:01.840 this bill is there. And the goal is to end late-term abortion. And I will answer your question by that
00:05:09.720 answer. Ideally, it would be great to have a legislation that will ban abortion at the second
00:05:16.040 trimester, like all civilized countries. It's time for Canada to be part of the civilized world.
00:05:22.540 So, and that's why I'll have a lot of pro-life people here in this writing that agree with me.
00:05:28.340 You know, you need to start talking.
00:05:31.000 I want to just get to the precision on here, on Maxine, because the legislation that you put
00:05:37.460 forward, I agree, it's a disgrace that Canada has no law on abortion on the books. And the bill that
00:05:43.120 you've announced this morning would cap it at 24 weeks, as I understand. Now, data are very hard to
00:05:50.140 come by in Canada on this, but it's a minority of abortions that take place after 24 weeks. I've seen
00:05:56.620 estimates that we could be in hundreds of individual abortions on the high end, maybe
00:06:01.400 eight to 9%. But most abortions are before 24 weeks. So do you think that should be a woman's 1.00
00:06:08.260 right to choose before 24 weeks?
00:06:11.280 But you're right about the number. And yes, we know, if we had only one abortion,
00:06:16.660 late-term abortion, it's one murder that we must not have. First, answering your question, 0.87
00:06:22.800 yes, I said, ideally, we must have the discussion. In Europe, it's all about the second term. And it's,
00:06:29.960 you know, they are regulating abortion at the second term. And yes, we need to have the discussion,
00:06:35.440 but we need to start that discussion before that. So let's have the legislation. Let's approve that
00:06:41.600 legislation in Parliament as soon as possible. And yes, my personal position on that is an answer.
00:06:46.960 Yes, it must be at the second term. You know, a lady will have three months to decide if she wants 1.00
00:06:54.120 to have an abortion or not. Three months, it's a lot. But that's why I said, I want to have a victory
00:07:01.240 here. We never had the victory the last 35 years. And the conservatives are so weak. They don't have
00:07:09.780 any conviction. They're afraid to speak about abortion. Look like last week, Trudeau said to
00:07:16.720 Podiev, oh, you want to reopen the debate on abortion. And oh, no, Podiev, no, no, I don't want
00:07:23.460 to reopen the debate. And actually, if you read the policy declaration on the website of the
00:07:28.580 Conservative Party of Canada at page 30, policy 76, they are saying, and I just want to read that to
00:07:37.500 you. They're saying that a Conservative government won't reopen the debate on abortion. They won't.
00:07:45.480 They won't. They won't. They won't table any legislation on abortion. That's their policy that
00:07:51.820 must change. And if we vote for a Conservative candidate here, it won't. And I understand that
00:07:57.500 people in this writing understand that. I'm curious about your evolution on this issue. I know in the
00:08:03.880 past you voted against pro-life legislation. I think there was one years ago about coerced
00:08:09.860 abortion under the Harper government that you voted against. I think Stephen Woodworth had
00:08:14.580 introduced a motion. So where has your perspective shifted or how has your perspective shifted on this?
00:08:21.860 In 2018, when we created the People's Party of Canada and the 2019 election, I said that during
00:08:31.460 that election that, you know, we need to reopen the debate. And I had a strong position at that
00:08:37.600 time. I said, I'm against sex selection, abortion. I'm against late term abortion. So that was a 0.71
00:08:43.440 position. And you're right to say that when I was an MP under the Conservative, as a Conservative,
00:08:49.440 under the Harper government, I did vote for a bill that was viewed as a pro-choice. But that's why
00:08:58.480 people here in this writing understand that. And they're very happy that I did that evolution. And
00:09:03.980 now they have a strong leader of a populist, conservative, true conservative party, common
00:09:10.460 sense party that is ready to have that debate. And because I'm raising that debate, journalists
00:09:16.060 will ask questions to Polyef today, if not tomorrow. And I hope you'll do that, Andrew. Ask him the question,
00:09:22.680 why are you so afraid to reopen the debate? When we have 51% of the population, Angus Reid, 2020 survey,
00:09:32.620 51% of Canadians said, enough is enough. We need to end late term abortion. And Polyef, like all these 1.00
00:09:40.860 other important issues, he won't speak about it. He won't speak about climate change. And the Paris
00:09:46.980 Accord is in line with the Paris Accord. We will withdraw from the Paris Accord. He's taking the
00:09:52.820 Conservative vote for granted out West. And people in this writing understand that. And that's why I believe that
00:09:59.920 people here will make history like they did in 1989, when they elected for the first time, a Reform Party
00:10:08.500 candidate Deborah Bray. Deborah, when they elected her in 1999, that was the first one in a by-election. And after that,
00:10:16.980 the reform had 51 MPs at the last, the next election, and the other next one, they were the
00:10:23.120 official opposition. So people in this writing understand that they can make history, and we can
00:10:29.120 have national debates on important issues for the future of our country. And I will, we've invited
00:10:35.520 your Conservative opponent onto the show, and we will ask him about this, because I agree. And you're not
00:10:41.160 saying anything that I find offensive in wanting there to be a debate on this. The question has been about
00:10:46.360 whether you are, I think, the most likely candidate to bring up that debate. So let me just ask you one more
00:10:52.500 question on abortion here, Maxine, because a lot of pro-life advocates reject what's called the gestational
00:10:58.780 approach, which you've just articulated, which is putting a limit in a certain place, because they think that
00:11:03.380 if you say abortion is not acceptable after 24 weeks, you're saying it is acceptable at other points. And I go back to
00:11:11.780 your own personal conviction on this, if you could write any law you wanted, not just what you think
00:11:16.880 is politically saleable, but what your ideal scenario would be, when should abortion be a choice, and when
00:11:23.380 should it no longer be a choice for women? 1.00
00:11:25.920 Yeah, I answered that question on my press conference. I said, ideally, it must be at the second term,
00:11:31.820 like every, every, every country in Europe. So I'm asking these radical feminists, why, you know, 1.00
00:11:41.280 Italy, France, Belgium, Germany, why it's okay?
00:11:45.740 Very liberal countries a lot of the time, too.
00:11:48.320 Yeah, and they're progressive countries, you're absolutely right. And these, you know, elites,
00:11:54.180 journalists are going, I know that from Quebec, that some of them are going to Italy for their summer.
00:12:00.280 You know, they have a legislation on abortion, and you cannot have an abortion after the second
00:12:06.860 trimesters. So it must be a discussion here, and I'm very pleased that I bring that. Speaking about
00:12:12.520 my opponent, he will be with you, and he may say that he agree with my position, but that's not the
00:12:18.740 question. The question, he can say what he wants in the writing, but when he'll be in Ottawa, he will be
00:12:24.260 silent. The question is the leader, Poliev. That's the question, because you know, they are
00:12:29.820 controlling their MP on abortion. We know that. I was part of that team. I know that. So he can't
00:12:36.400 say anything about abortion. It's not important, and people in this writing will know. They know that
00:12:41.880 it's coming from the leader of the party. He is pro-choice, and he won't allow any debate. So I'm
00:12:50.280 very, very pleased that we will ask that question to my opponent. But please, ask that question to my
00:12:55.900 opponent as a leader to Pierre Poliev, that's the most important answer that we must have, that
00:13:01.900 Canadians must have. Let's turn to the writing itself here. So we were discussing earlier, Maxime,
00:13:08.620 the PPC did very well in Portage-Lisker relative to everywhere else in the country. It was the
00:13:13.720 strongest writing, and I know you obviously want to win, but as far as the bigger picture here, what do
00:13:19.020 you consider a win short of a victory on the ballot? I mean, do you feel that you need to get
00:13:25.300 that 20% of the vote to prove that the PPC is still the force it was in 2021?
00:13:32.940 I like your question, Andrew. A win is a win. So a win for me will be to be the MP for people in Portage-Lisker.
00:13:42.740 And I'm here campaigning full-time for them. My schedule is full, and I'm very pleased with that.
00:13:49.020 So for me, a win is to be their MP the night of the election. And I believe that it's doable.
00:13:54.680 We have a strong team, and people understand they have the opportunity to send a message to Ottawa
00:14:00.680 right now. And you know, it's not about spitting the vote. That ridiculous argument is not valid.
00:14:08.340 We won't change the government. The Trudeau government will be there after the election. 0.71
00:14:13.080 So it's safe for them to vote for the PPC, to vote for me. And actually, I will be their insurance policy
00:14:20.220 that Poliev, if he has the courage to be a conservative, I will support him. But I will
00:14:28.340 bring that debate in Ottawa, and I will support Poliev when or if he is a real conservative with
00:14:34.940 real conservative family values. So it's a win-win for people in this writing, and they understand
00:14:40.500 that. That's why my answer to your question is, a win is a win.
00:14:45.160 No, and I appreciate that. And it's always funny when you see politicians who lose, and then they
00:14:49.700 get on stage and try to find a way to make it seem like they really won, like the popular vote or
00:14:54.240 something. But the point, I guess, that I was getting at there, Maxime, is that a lot of political
00:14:58.980 columnists in Ottawa, who I know are not always the most credible sources, have said that the PPC's
00:15:04.160 success in 2021 was kind of a temporary blip because of the pandemic. There was this frustration
00:15:10.740 with all of these circumstances that might not be there right now. And I guess I'm just curious
00:15:16.140 what, for you, the stakes are if you don't do as well as your candidate in 2021 did.
00:15:21.120 I must say, Andrew, that all these mainstream media journalists, they said the same thing
00:15:29.500 in 2019. When we had 1.6% of the vote, they said, oh, that's the end of that party. Goodbye,
00:15:37.140 Bernier. They all wrote that. And now after the last election, 5%, they were a little bit
00:15:42.760 surprised and didn't have any choice to cover my election the last three weeks of the last
00:15:48.100 campaign. And now they're saying, and 5%. And now they're saying, oh, you know, Bernie
00:15:54.340 won't do anything. He won't be able to have 20%, 25%. He won't be able to do like his candidates.
00:16:00.660 So I don't want to answer that. You know, for me, they are not credible. I'm here on the
00:16:05.860 ground with the people. And that's why I believe I can win this riding. And I spoke with my people
00:16:11.980 on the ground, and they are in agreement with me, and they're working hard for that. We'll see
00:16:17.040 what will happen. But for me, I strongly believe that it's a riding that I can win. And I'm doing
00:16:23.340 all the effort to do that. So what these journalists are writing, it's not important for me. And I don't
00:16:31.040 mind. Manitoba is a bit of an interesting province for you to be running in because you're a convict
00:16:37.240 in Manitoba now. I mean, as of yesterday, the court has put this, I think it was a $2,000 fine on you
00:16:43.200 for campaigning in Manitoba. And I played that clip of your arrest back then when you gave that
00:16:48.620 famous line, and the police officer asked if you had any weapons. And you said only your words,
00:16:53.680 which I thought was quite brilliant and quite clever. But let's talk about why you decided to
00:17:00.480 not fight this as much. Because a lot of people have been looking at the legal challenges that
00:17:06.400 are underway and really hoping that there's going to be this reckoning in the court system
00:17:10.000 on COVID penalties. But you actually pleaded out, as I understand.
00:17:14.840 Yeah, what I said, it's very important. I didn't say that I'm guilty of anything,
00:17:19.380 because under a provincial law, you're not guilty. So what I said to save money for the taxpayer here
00:17:25.480 in Manitoba, and to save court time, because it was supposed to be a three days hearing, it was only
00:17:31.520 half a day, half a day, I said, you know, and I'm a responsible politician. I said, yes, I was there.
00:17:37.580 I did a meeting in a park, and I didn't want all the police and all these witnesses saying that I was
00:17:46.720 there. So I did admit that I was there. And I did that. I did admit that it was not in line with the
00:17:55.860 regulations at that time. So because of this admission of facts, we had an argument only on
00:18:02.460 the penalties, the fines. So and you asked a good question, why not appealing to that decision and
00:18:09.580 going to the appeal court? Because here in Manitoba, there one case that is right now in front, before,
00:18:18.300 sorry, before the appeal court of Manitoba, about the same subject, illegal gathering in a park. So
00:18:26.100 that's why we will have a decision from, from the appeal court, maybe this year about that. So I
00:18:32.520 didn't need to appeal that. So for me, I'm responsible, I said I was that. And also, I had time to speak to
00:18:39.520 the judge. And I told the judge that all these regulations were unconstitutional, illegal, immoral,
00:18:45.420 and I'm not appealing your decision, because there's a case and we'll know what the appeal
00:18:50.600 court will say. But at the same time, don't forget, Andrew, I'm appealing a decision from the federal
00:18:56.220 court with Brian Petford about my right and the right of Canadians to be able to travel freely across
00:19:02.360 our country. We are appealing the decision of the vaccine passport that were imposed by the
00:19:07.320 federal government, because we had a decision not in our favor at the federal court. So we are
00:19:14.440 appealing that and we will go up to the federal court, to the Supreme Court, sorry, about that case.
00:19:21.620 All right, Maxime Bernier, by-election candidate in Portage-Lisker and leader of the People's Party
00:19:27.240 of Canada. What are you most looking forward to about being back on the campaign trail?
00:19:31.840 Yes, I'm going back. We have a rally tonight with Laura Lynn Thompson. And, you know, it's a huge
00:19:39.240 riding. I'm a little bit surprised, you know, going to one part of the riding to the other part
00:19:44.120 of the riding by car. It would be, it can be two hours. So I'll be on my car. I will be in each
00:19:50.020 corner of this riding and I'm having fun here. I know that you may, you may see it, but I'm having
00:19:55.440 fun. It's great. We'll see. And I hope that you'll be able to cover our campaign. And I'm very
00:20:00.620 pleased that I had the opportunity to be with you, Andrew. All right. Thank you very much,
00:20:05.240 Maxime Bernier. Good to talk to you. Thank you. Bye-bye. Thanks for listening to The Andrew
00:20:09.580 Lawton Show. Support the program by donating to True North at www.tnc.news.