Juno News - March 14, 2022


Modern leftist feminism is making everyone miserable


Episode Stats


Length

35 minutes

Words per minute

158.23341

Word count

5,631

Sentence count

251

Harmful content

Misogyny

61

sentences flagged

Hate speech

27

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Janice Viamengo is a retired professor of English literature at the University of Ottawa, who has been an outspoken critic of modern feminism and is one of the most prominent anti-feminist crusaders on social media. She is also the author of the book Sons of Feminism: Men Have Their Say, which was published in 2017.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.080 Modern leftist feminism is one of the most harmful forces in our society. 1.00
00:00:04.080 I'm Candice Malcolm and this is The Candice Malcolm Show.
00:00:10.560 Hi everyone, thank you so much for tuning into the podcast. So as you know, we usually cover
00:00:14.320 politics, federal politics in Canada, all things kind of political in Canada. Sometimes we like
00:00:18.720 to take a break from the day-to-day politics in our life and look at the bigger picture,
00:00:23.040 look at culture and dive into some of the cultural critiques that I myself have and that are prevalent
00:00:28.880 out there. And one of my biggest critiques is against modern feminism, the Me Too movement,
00:00:34.000 and the way that it denigrates men. It tells men that they're toxic, that they're destructive,
00:00:38.560 while also ironically and contradictorily telling women to be more like men. So these disastrous
00:00:44.240 mixed messages in our society have had a catastrophic impact, especially on young 0.98
00:00:49.040 people trying to find, you know, someone to spend their life with, someone to get married with. And
00:00:54.480 I think it's so important to, to look at these, look at these harmful forces and to debunk them.
00:00:59.920 I'm so pleased today to be joined by one of Canada's foremost public intellectuals who clearly
00:01:04.880 and courageously debunks the harmful messages of modern feminism. So I'm pleased today to be joined
00:01:10.560 by Janice Viamengo. Janice is a retired professor of English literature at the University of Ottawa.
00:01:16.320 For many years, she has been an outspoken critic of modern feminism,
00:01:20.160 and is one of the most prominent anti-feminist crusaders on social media. Janice hosts the 0.99
00:01:25.280 Fiamengo Files on Studio Brulee, where she challenges modern far-left feminism and the 1.00
00:01:30.320 woke indoctrination at academia and universities. Back in August 2021, Studio Brulee was removed from
00:01:36.800 YouTube, it was censored. However, you can still find Janice's video on a new channel they created,
00:01:41.120 Studio B. Janice is also the author of an excellent book, Sons of Feminism, Men Have Their Say,
00:01:46.240 which was published back in 2017. So Janice, thank you so much for joining us. It's a pleasure to see
00:01:51.280 you and have you on the show. Well, thank you very much, Candice. That's a very generous introduction.
00:01:56.400 Thank you. I feel very flattered. It's wonderful to be on your show. Thank you.
00:02:01.520 Yeah, it's so great to have you. So since I spoke to you last, you have retired from your position at
00:02:06.560 the University of Ottawa. And I also recently learned that your YouTube channel was shut down and censored,
00:02:10.800 which is such a shame because you have so many excellent videos up there. I was telling you before the
00:02:15.360 interview started that I started watching those videos back when you were covering the Gian Gomeschi
00:02:19.440 trial. I know you covered the Brett Kavanaugh trial and you have so many interesting insights. So can you
00:02:25.120 tell us a little bit about, first of all, you leaving the University of Ottawa and also what happened with
00:02:31.200 your YouTube channel? Yeah, well, I retired in 2019. And I was fairly happy to leave the university,
00:02:40.080 although I was sad to leave many of my wonderful colleagues. But I find that the university, as
00:02:46.320 probably everybody who is not a leftist would agree, it's a fairly uncomfortable place for dissident
00:02:55.360 intellectuals or dissident thinkers in general, especially for those of us sort of on the conservative
00:03:00.720 side of cultural politics. It's a place where you don't feel that you're able to make arguments about
00:03:09.040 a whole wide range of hot button issues, you know, from a from a wide variety of perspectives. So so I
00:03:16.240 retired then and part of what I was looking forward to doing was was doing more writing and of course doing
00:03:24.080 writing more video scripts, because that had been something I was doing since 2015 at Studio Brulé.
00:03:32.640 And I had a long running series on academic feminism, and its impact on modern culture. And my take
00:03:43.200 generally was that what happens in academia, unfortunately, never stays in academia, it moves
00:03:48.880 out into the wider world. And it has real world impact so that ideas about the oppressive male gaze,
00:03:56.800 or about women's lived experience and standpoint theory, or about the creation of docile bodies
00:04:05.520 through patriarchal power, all of those ideas become public policy, they become part of journalism,
00:04:14.000 they become part of health policy, they invade the sphere of law, all of the feminist 1.00
00:04:21.680 complicating of the idea of sexual consent, whether women can actually consent to sex in a patriarchal,
00:04:29.920 allegedly patriarchal society in which women don't really have power or agency. All of those ideas have 0.98
00:04:38.160 had a very significant impact in the wider society, often a very, very damaging one for individual men,
00:04:46.720 for freedom of speech, for the presumption of innocence, in all sorts of quite horrific ways. And
00:04:54.800 so I wanted to try to chronicle that and to show people where these ideas came from in academic feminism. 0.72
00:05:02.080 And yeah, and then last summer, so we were going along my producer Steve Brule and I were making
00:05:09.280 more videos, and all of a sudden, we were permanently banned from YouTube. And of course, they never tell
00:05:15.360 you why they just tell you that you've in some way contravened the community guidelines. And so that was
00:05:22.240 the end of, you know, all of these videos that we had produced, we lost all of the view numbers, of course,
00:05:29.120 and the comments underneath, which were often fascinating conversations, that was really
00:05:34.320 disappointing. But we have started up again now. And we're called Studio B. And so we're on YouTube
00:05:42.400 again. And I hope people will, will come in and find us there. I'm doing a new series on the history of
00:05:51.120 feminism now, focusing especially on the 19th century and the origins of the feminist movement.
00:05:59.760 And my point is to show that although we have this idea that feminism started as a really good idea, 0.51
00:06:05.760 you know, it was all about equality. Certainly, there were some feminists who wanted to take their 1.00
00:06:11.440 equal share of the burdens as well as the rights of citizenship. But my point is that actually feminism was 1.00
00:06:18.640 always deeply implicated in man-hating, in toxic resentment, and in female moral superiority. And 1.00
00:06:29.440 so I'm trying to bring out some of those strands in my analysis of early figures who were involved
00:06:35.280 in the movement and the various issues that those early feminists tackled. 0.79
00:06:40.080 Well, that was going to be my next question, because I know that you refer to yourself as an
00:06:44.480 anti-feminist. The first time I ever heard that I was in Washington, DC. And I happened to go to a
00:06:49.760 seminar hosted by Christina Hoff Summers, one of my friends brought me. And I was just so like,
00:06:55.760 it was so enlightening to me to see her speak. And I know that she's also kind of takes that name,
00:07:02.000 an anti-feminist, but she would consider herself a first wave and probably even a second wave feminist. 1.00
00:07:06.880 Whereas, I don't know that you have that same connection. So I was going to ask you,
00:07:12.400 if you do consider yourself a feminist in any way, I think a lot of people agree that third wave and
00:07:19.120 fourth wave feminism has really turned into a very negative masculine man-hating environment. And 1.00
00:07:26.080 not just that, but also the whole intersectional white supremacist accusations that we now hear.
00:07:32.960 But could you maybe walk us through what the difference would be between yourself and Christina
00:07:37.760 Hoff Summers and what it is about first and second wave feminism that you, that you, I think, I think, 0.98
00:07:42.160 I don't want to put words into your mouth, but I think that you, um, reject.
00:07:45.120 Yeah, thank you. Um, that's a great question. I think, um, uh, Christina Hoff Summers, whom I admire
00:07:52.400 a great deal. She's done wonderful work. Her book, Who Stole Feminism is just a primer in all of the
00:07:58.720 inaccuracies and myths of feminist criticism and, and so-called feminist research. She's, she's a wonderful woman,
00:08:06.640 but she calls herself an equity feminist. And there are other women around who are also critical of
00:08:12.080 many of feminism's exaggerations and inaccuracies. Women like Cathy Young and Camille Paglia and various 0.95
00:08:20.240 others. Um, a wonderful, uh, book, um, or, or critic named Daphne Pattai, who's got a book about sexual, the
00:08:28.400 sexual harassment industry. I think she would also call herself an equity feminist. And, um, yeah, I don't 1.00
00:08:35.120 call myself any kind of feminist. I obviously believe that every person, regardless of their
00:08:42.480 sex or any other inborn characteristics should have an opportunity to make a contribution to society 1.00
00:08:49.520 and that they shouldn't be hindered by any of their inborn characteristics. Um, but, uh, I don't believe
00:08:57.040 that there was ever a time that feminism was free of female moral superiority and attacks on, on, uh, 1.00
00:09:04.640 masculinity. For instance, if you go back to 1848, which is sometimes considered the beginnings of the
00:09:13.200 first wave feminist movement in the United States, this was a women's rights convention at Seneca Falls, 0.97
00:09:19.280 New York. And, uh, those ladies, Elizabeth Cady Stanton was the primary mover and shaker, but there were
00:09:26.560 other, there were some Quaker women involved and they were advocating for women's greater freedoms
00:09:32.080 and rights, including the right to vote. And they wrote a document, uh, called, um, I'm blanking on the
00:09:40.960 name now. Um, the Declaration of Sentiments is what it's called. And it says, uh, as its central thesis,
00:09:49.280 that the history of mankind is a history of repeated user patients and injuries by man against woman with
00:10:01.520 the express purpose of establishing a tyranny over her. That's the whole history of mankind is men 1.00
00:10:11.840 oppressing women. So that notion that the whole world can be divided up into an oppressor class 1.00
00:10:19.360 and an oppressed class, which we now see, you know, everywhere in intersectional feminism, 1.00
00:10:24.720 and that the oppressor class is blameworthy and toxic and responsible for evil, while the oppressor,
00:10:34.640 sorry, oppressed class is innocent, you know, morally innocent, not responsible for evil. That idea was
00:10:43.600 there at the core of first wave feminism and you can trace it right through to the present day. So I 0.55
00:10:49.520 don't believe there ever was a feminism that was really very interested in equality. It was always about 0.99
00:10:56.320 punishing men for the alleged sins of their fathers. It was never about recognizing what men bring
00:11:04.640 to civilization. It was never about recognizing the significance of masculinity in creating cultures
00:11:12.000 where women and children could flourish. It was never about expressing any gratitude for men. It was
00:11:18.560 always about blaming and about asserting the alleged moral superiority of women who were supposedly,
00:11:25.360 you know, much more nurturing, much more empathetic, wouldn't start wars, responsible for everything
00:11:31.920 good and loving in the world. And so that notion of collective blame that all men now, especially,
00:11:39.280 of course, all white, able-bodied, heterosexual men are responsible for everything evil. And even if 0.95
00:11:46.400 they've never done anything bad in their lives, should have to shoulder that burden and apologize for
00:11:52.560 their alleged privilege and take a step back and allow their sisters to come forward and collect the 1.00
00:11:58.720 special scholarships and be hired through affirmative action programs and be given all sorts of special
00:12:05.280 programming and advantages while they just have to accept that because they were born male, that they
00:12:11.680 are second-class citizens, that they're not only disposable but they're blameworthy and hated, rightly hated. 1.00
00:12:18.480 I just think that is a terrible ideology. There's nothing good to be had from it and we should just
00:12:26.080 jettison it entirely. Well, it sounds a lot like communism and the sort of modern intersectional
00:12:32.720 situation where, you know, everyone is an oppressor and an oppressor. And one of the things about
00:12:38.000 feminism that has struck me since I was in university myself is that it's so counter to our own lived
00:12:44.240 experience in human nature. Like everybody knows that there are bad guys out there, right? And the thing
00:12:50.960 that you need in society to counteract bad guys is good guys, right? Like that's, that's, that's what our whole
00:12:56.720 society is about. Like having police officers there to protect you, you know, having a male 0.67
00:13:02.800 friend walk you home at night, you know, when you're in university, getting married and having that partnership,
00:13:08.640 someone there to have children and have that, that, that unity that you need, someone to go out to, you know,
00:13:16.400 take care of the family, someone else to stay home with the children. And yet this message is, is, is so
00:13:22.160 prevalent, especially in, in academic circles. Why isn't it refuted and debunked more often? Because to me,
00:13:28.000 it's so counter to human nature that it, it almost doesn't even need to be said because it's, it's almost laughable.
00:13:33.680 Yeah, it, it is so bizarre. Uh, the contradictions in feminism are so evident to anyone who thinks about it, 1.00
00:13:42.640 even for a few minutes, exactly the points that you just made. Men are told over and over again,
00:13:48.400 that they are by nature, violent, and that their masculine qualities like aggression, assertiveness,
00:13:55.760 competitiveness, risk taking, etc. All these things are allegedly toxic, they should become more like
00:14:02.800 women. But then they're also expected to step forward if they see a woman in distress. And they're
00:14:10.560 expected even sometimes to risk their lives, and men do risk their lives for women, even for strangers.
00:14:18.240 Um, and, uh, somehow that toxic aspect of their masculinity is required in particular situations
00:14:26.240 if they're encountering another toxic man or a threat to a woman. So the, the, the contradictions
00:14:33.840 right there in how men are supposed to behave are never really clearly resolved. And as you say,
00:14:40.800 we all know that, um, you know, in our society, there are many men who absolutely love women and
00:14:49.920 are interested in working and indeed sacrificing and have created this incredibly, um, flourishing,
00:14:58.880 secure civilization that we're now fortunate enough to live in, um, out of, in many cases, love for women
00:15:06.560 and the desire to create safe spaces for women and children to flourish in, uh, and yet none of that
00:15:12.560 is acknowledged. So we live in a strange society in which, um, the, I think the, the mutual recognition
00:15:20.800 and reciprocity between the sexes that is so important for a functioning society has broken down.
00:15:27.440 Men are still expected to care for and support and applaud women. They're expected to encourage women 0.84
00:15:34.880 to enter all of the spheres that were once mainly masculine spheres of endeavor, including the military,
00:15:41.520 policing, firefighting, all those areas aren't, have now been open to women and they're supposed to, 0.99
00:15:47.520 men are supposed to welcome women into those spaces. And yet it's not clear what women are supposed to
00:15:53.840 do in response to men and what, what men are entitled to in our society. That even word entitlement has
00:16:00.720 become kind of a dirty word. Uh, so yeah, there are just so many contradictions that I think really
00:16:07.600 prevent, especially young people being indoctrinated into this toxic ideology, that prevents us from
00:16:14.800 recognizing what is good in our society and what should be preserved.
00:16:19.040 One of the other contradictions that I always noted was that, uh, from the time I was in university,
00:16:24.080 I took one women's studies course and I found it to be so lacking any intellectual rigor. It was so 1.00
00:16:30.000 frustrating to me to hear the discourse of the other students. There would be like, like not exaggerating,
00:16:35.520 uh, a girl would cry like almost every class just talking about something. And it was, it was just,
00:16:40.400 I couldn't even attend the class. I actually made an arrangement with the professor where I would do
00:16:44.640 the lectures, um, in the library and I w I wouldn't go to class because it was too infuriating to me.
00:16:49.680 But that's an aside, um, that, that, that we were told that men have all of these negative qualities.
00:16:55.680 And yet at the same time, women, especially in my generation, were told to be more like men.
00:17:00.160 Um, you know, when it came to sexuality, uh, even like public drunkenness and, and, and, and you see
00:17:06.400 more and more women going out and drinking and that's like part of the culture. Um, something 1.00
00:17:10.880 that, that, that didn't used to be the case, for instance, in my mother's generation. Um, and, and,
00:17:15.280 and focus so much on career, like to the extent where it's like you wake up and you're 30 and you're
00:17:21.280 like, oh, I forgot to get married and have kids. And, and, and, and I'm like not setting myself up for
00:17:26.560 an important, uh, well, well-rounded life because I've been focused so much on career. And I know so many
00:17:32.080 women, um, in my age group in their thirties, uh, who, who have neglected that sort of like personal
00:17:38.320 aspect. So, so whilst telling men that they should be less like men, we're telling women to be more
00:17:43.440 like men, more like men. And I think that the result is that both men and women are sort of miserable 0.94
00:17:49.200 unless they have some wisdom to go back and look at the sort of traditional lifestyles that, that,
00:17:55.440 that people had, you know, what did your parents do? What did your grandparents do? What did your
00:17:59.040 great grandparents do? And, and looking at that wisdom, as opposed to the sort of modern day
00:18:04.320 advice that people are given. So I, I'm wondering what your advice is to young people, people in
00:18:10.160 their twenties, people in university now, both men and women about how to engage in relationships,
00:18:16.560 what the proper role for men and women is. Cause I think I, I know so many people now that,
00:18:21.440 you know, they're not married because they can't find someone who, you know, what they're looking for
00:18:26.800 because they think that, Oh, that men, my age are terrible or women, my age are terrible. And
00:18:30.400 I can kind of understand and relate, but I'm wondering what, what your advice is for young
00:18:34.960 people about gender roles. It's a really big issue. And you know, you're right that that women are 1.00
00:18:43.040 encouraged to think that their fulfillment and sense of life satisfaction is going to come from
00:18:50.800 achieving what men have traditionally been exhorted to achieve. And, you know, there are all sorts of
00:18:56.960 studies now coming out showing that women in general are much less happy and less satisfied with their
00:19:04.240 lives than they were earlier. In fact, there was a huge study by two professors out of the University
00:19:10.720 of Pennsylvania that looked at all sorts of different surveys. It was one of these meta studies
00:19:15.840 that collected data over the last 50 years. And it clearly found that starting in the 1980s,
00:19:22.160 women in general have progressively become less and less satisfied with their lives, 1.00
00:19:29.040 both absolutely in comparison to women of previous generations, and also in comparison to men,
00:19:35.760 interestingly enough. And so, you know, as women's economic opportunities have clearly improved, 1.00
00:19:44.320 as women are freer to do, you know, take on professional careers. You could even say, 1.00
00:19:50.480 as women are freer, as you pointed out, to engage in more masculine and less moral kinds of behaviors. 0.99
00:20:00.240 Women can divorce their husbands and live off their husband's earning, they can abort their children 1.00
00:20:06.320 with impunity, they can walk in the slut walk and declare their right to be as sexually promiscuous as 1.00
00:20:13.520 they want and nobody dare say no. And yet they're not happier. And the researchers themselves, who
00:20:20.320 are feminist researchers, really couldn't, they had no way of offering an explanation. And they ended up 1.00
00:20:27.920 falling back on things like, well, the feminist movement, the gains of the feminist movement have
00:20:32.800 actually improved the lives of men more than they've improved the lives of women. That's what they were
00:20:37.280 reduced to speculating, or women still take on more of the emotional burden of caring and looking after 1.00
00:20:45.760 a household. And that's why they have greater stress, you know, they made up all sorts of answers. And it
00:20:52.160 seemed to me that a big part of the answer was that women no longer have a sense of what it means to be a good 1.00
00:21:00.160 woman in the world. Women are no longer exhorted to pursue virtue, feminine virtue. Men still have an 0.98
00:21:08.720 idea of what it means to be a good man, despite all the slander, all the anti male discourse around,
00:21:14.880 which is a very heavy thing for men to have to take on, but they still know what a good man is. A good
00:21:19.920 man is a man who achieves and makes a contribution to his society. He looks after his family, he protects and
00:21:27.360 provides, he seeks justice, he defends the weak, you know, we have all of those, those classic
00:21:33.840 masculine virtues, they're still in place. Whereas what is a good woman now? If you ask a feminist what 1.00
00:21:40.080 a good woman is, she'll just laugh and say that those are ideas that tried to create women and turn 1.00
00:21:47.120 them into dupes of the patriarchy. So she'll say a good woman is a woman who smashes patriarchal oppression 1.00
00:21:53.840 and subverts the social order. We used to have ideas about femininity, about being a good help meat, 1.00
00:22:03.120 about being nurturing and caring, about looking after one's family, the maternal virtues, you know,
00:22:11.120 all of those kinds of things, being chased, being sexually virtuous, being faithful, all of that. And
00:22:18.880 I think it's time that we have to seriously start thinking again about what the feminine virtues are,
00:22:26.000 and why they have mattered historically, and why they still matter today.
00:22:30.480 Oh, that's so interesting. Yeah, I listened to recently, Jordan Peterson did an interview with,
00:22:37.200 I think it was Ben Shapiro, and Ben asked something about like, is there is there a
00:22:42.160 a example in like, mythology or in like Disney movies or something of like, the female that 0.99
00:22:49.920 that everyone ought to aspire to that women ought to aspire to. And I think Jordan Peterson talked
00:22:53.840 about Belle from Beauty and the Beast, because, you know, she was, she liked to read and she was
00:22:58.960 interesting, and she was introspective, she didn't care about society. And there was this, you know,
00:23:02.960 the sort of main guy in the movie that everyone liked in the town, I don't know if you're familiar
00:23:10.240 with the story of Beauty and the Beast, but Gaston, he, you know, he was the hunk in the town, and all the
00:23:14.720 women liked him, but Belle didn't like him, because she thought that he was too arrogant. And then instead,
00:23:18.960 she chose this other man. So the story was kind of more about her in regard to, you know, getting married,
00:23:26.240 or who she chose to partner with. But it was just the question itself was an interesting question,
00:23:30.720 because we have a lot of stories of men and great men still in our culture, whereas less so for women.
00:23:37.840 So maybe I'll put that question to you. Are there any women in literature, you have an English literature 0.99
00:23:42.880 background, that you would point to as what you think of as an ideal woman in myth or in stories?
00:23:49.600 Oh, gee, that's a good question. I don't think I have a good answer. But, you know, my favorite author
00:23:54.400 is Jane Austen. And she was deeply interested in the question of the virtues, both the Christian and
00:24:04.560 the classical virtues. And she is interested in masculine virtues, certainly, but she focuses
00:24:11.200 especially on heroines, and on how they have to learn these various virtues of, you know, and they're 0.51
00:24:20.640 the traditional virtues of bearing up under suffering, and being faithful, and enduring, and examining
00:24:35.680 the self in order to look clearly at one's weaknesses, overcoming selfishness, and narcissism,
00:24:46.880 caring more about others than about oneself, you know, those, those are the, the very traditional
00:24:52.720 kinds of virtues. And I, and I think as I get older and older, I appreciate the, the importance of that,
00:25:03.120 of caring about others, and, you know, not not being selfish, making a contribution to one's family,
00:25:12.800 finding the balance in one's life, so that one can give to the people one loves. I think being
00:25:19.440 nurturing, being empathetic, we're told that those are the virtues that that women naturally possess, 1.00
00:25:25.440 but I think modern feminism often encourages women to be the opposite of those things. So, so for me, 1.00
00:25:33.040 that's a, that's a, Austin's heroines offer really interesting examples of good women learning to 0.98
00:25:41.840 examine themselves, and to become stronger and better.
00:25:45.520 Well, that's interesting. That's great advice. Well, I did have one other question that I wanted
00:25:49.520 to ask you about. You mentioned researchers at the University of Pennsylvania, and it reminded me that I
00:25:53.360 wanted to ask you about this trans swimmer named Leah Thomas. So, the NCAA swimming champions are
00:25:59.120 happening, championship is happening this week. And there's a trans swimmer on the University of
00:26:03.680 Pennsylvania team. So, a biological male who competed with the men's team, and then had a
00:26:09.200 transition or began identifying as a woman. And now that, that, that Leah Thompson swims with women 0.99
00:26:16.080 has just shattered all of the records. And I've been reading into it, I take some interest in it,
00:26:21.120 because it's a fascinating sort of human events story. And when I read about it, I mean,
00:26:25.360 there's two emotions that I feel one is like, just a kind of remorse, like, I feel sorry for
00:26:31.920 this individual, because it's such a spectacle taking away from the sport, I feel sorry for the
00:26:36.240 girls involved, I feel pity for everybody involved in the situation, because it's so
00:26:41.200 excruciating, seeing this tension between a clearly, you know, biological male who can swim at a
00:26:48.400 pace is just nothing like what these women consume. And then also, a sense of anger and frustration that, 1.00
00:26:54.480 you know, you have this separate division, NCAA still split sports into men and women. And the
00:27:00.400 whole purpose of women's sports as a dedicated, separate event for men's is so that women can 1.00
00:27:06.160 succeed and women can have their own, you know, can compete on a level playing field. And it's just so, 0.97
00:27:12.240 so much injustice here, that it's so out of hand. So I wanted to get your take on this,
00:27:17.600 because it kind of adds in another element to your critiques on feminism. How do trans women, 1.00
00:27:23.680 like Lea Thomas, fit into that? 0.99
00:27:25.680 Yeah, well, that's a really big subject. And I agree with you that, you know, my heart goes out to
00:27:33.120 everybody involved. And the trans issue in general is a really complicated one. But if we're going to
00:27:42.160 focus just on trans women in women's sport, it's a fascinating instance of one of the consequences 1.00
00:27:53.600 of a significant part of feminist theory. And it also really exposes some of the incoherencies of the
00:28:01.360 feminist position on gender. Now, it seems to me just to cut to the chase, it seems to me clear that
00:28:08.160 Leah Thomas is a man biologically. I don't have any problem calling Leah Thomas she and treating her 0.79
00:28:19.120 as a woman in general society. But Leah Thomas has only made the decision to transition a couple years
00:28:27.200 ago. She's been, I think, doing a year of hormone therapy. Her body is still a male body. And to pretend 0.98
00:28:36.720 that it isn't that it isn't so much significantly stronger and faster than a female body. I mean,
00:28:43.680 men have a larger muscle mass, a much larger heart and lungs. Their upper body strength is significantly
00:28:53.120 greater than women's. Men have much greater hand grip strength. You know, their bones are heavier and 1.00
00:29:03.280 larger. You know, a year of hormone therapy doesn't change that. And so if we can't recognize the
00:29:11.120 fundamental truth of biological reality, we are really at sea as a society. And you know, and there
00:29:19.840 are other examples of this happening all across sport. There was a case of a mixed martial art fighter
00:29:27.920 named mixed martial arts fighter named Fallon Fox who actually broke a woman's skull in a competition.
00:29:37.600 And the woman said that she'd never encountered strength like that in all the years she'd been
00:29:42.880 competing in mixed martial arts. Because Fallon Fox has a man's body. And there are many other examples
00:29:50.480 of this. And yet, you know, I can't help sometimes but feel a kind of rueful, not satisfaction. Well,
00:29:58.800 yeah, it is satisfaction. I have to admit, I do, I feel a kind of satisfaction. Because feminists have for 1.00
00:30:04.960 decades claimed that almost all of gender, sex itself as a biological condition, is a social construct. You
00:30:15.920 can find, you know, PDFs of articles by major feminist theories. There's one by Judith Lorber and Yancy
00:30:23.680 Martin called The Socially Constructed Body, where they essentially argue that although there is an
00:30:29.520 underlay of biological reality, it we really don't even know what it is, because it is so thoroughly
00:30:36.640 constructed. And they're, they're talking about women in sport. And their fundamental argument is that
00:30:43.600 there is really no difference between women and men in sport that we can definitely point to. And
00:30:49.440 that much of what we think we know about the differences between male and female bodies is as
00:30:54.800 a result of social conditioning, women are supposedly trained, you know, from the time they're two or three, 1.00
00:31:01.440 to act differently from men, they move differently in space, they they're told they throw like a girl,
00:31:07.840 and therefore they do throw like a girl, like they make those arguments over and over again. If we had 0.94
00:31:13.520 not allowed those arguments to achieve credence in academia, and then moving out into the wider world,
00:31:20.400 we would not be where we are now, with this bizarre situation, where a good portion of feminist 0.91
00:31:30.080 intellectuals and others claim that simply by deciding that a man wants to be a woman, that that man becomes
00:31:39.280 a woman, it's truly bizarre. And on the other side, of course, then there is this sort of aggrieved, 0.98
00:31:47.600 entitled anger on the part of other feminist women who do not appreciate the encroachment into women's 1.00
00:31:59.280 sports and other female domains of male persons claiming to be women. And but that falls often 0.62
00:32:09.040 back into a kind of feminist grievance argument about how these men are oppressing women. This is
00:32:17.760 just another example of patriarchal oppression. These men want to be women because allegedly,
00:32:24.400 you know, men hate women, and but somehow want to destroy women and take over their spaces.
00:32:31.840 And so, and I think, you know, that really gets at that tension that is so much a part of feminism. On 1.00
00:32:38.560 the one hand, women are no different from men, we should never say that women can't do certain things,
00:32:43.200 because that's sexist. And yet now, suddenly, again, we hear that women need special rights, they need 0.91
00:32:50.240 special women only spaces, where, you know, male bodies must not intrude. All the while, though,
00:32:58.320 over the last 30 years, male spaces have been continually eroded. You know, if men in a fire
00:33:06.000 hall said, you know, look, we're really uncomfortable with the idea of having women working as firefighters 0.98
00:33:11.440 along us because they are simply, they don't have the strength, they can't do what is required to
00:33:17.520 fight fires. Same with the military, all sorts of standards have been lowered in these various
00:33:23.280 formerly male domains in order to admit women and to pretend that there is no significant difference
00:33:29.120 between women and men. So I think we have to stand on the bedrock ground of biological reality. If we've 0.77
00:33:37.600 lost that, we really can't have sane conversations about any of these issues. And I'm not that sympathetic
00:33:45.760 to either side of the feminist debate on the question of trans women in sports, because I think both,
00:33:53.920 you know, buy into various feminist postulates, either anger at men, and exaggerated claims about 1.00
00:34:03.360 toxic masculinity and patriarchal oppression, or the gender as a social construct position,
00:34:10.320 neither of them is helpful in finding a sane solution to these kinds of conflicts.
00:34:15.840 I tend to agree. I sometimes just sort of sit back and laugh at the two sides of the left, you know,
00:34:22.320 warring over this issue. The only reason I want this issue to be resolved is because I have a daughter,
00:34:29.600 and I want her to be able to enjoy women's sports like I did growing up. I loved playing sports. I was on a
00:34:35.120 hockey team, I played with the boys until I hit about 12. And then I went on to a girls team, I played soccer,
00:34:40.880 baseball, and I love that. And the idea that perhaps if we continue down this path, like the idea of women's sports
00:34:47.600 just simply won't exist, because we'll go back to to mixing. So that's, that's, that's part of the reason why I think
00:34:53.600 it's important to push back at least and try to find some truth here because truth seems to be left
00:35:00.800 behind. Well, Janice, thank you so much for your time. Thank you for your clear explanation of these
00:35:05.600 issues. It's always really a pleasure to speak to you. So I really appreciate your time today. Thanks
00:35:09.600 for joining the show. Well, thank you. I really enjoyed it. Obviously, we could go on for much
00:35:13.600 longer. There's so many fascinating issues. So thanks a lot for having me on your wonderful program.
00:35:18.400 Well, thank you. I'm definitely gonna have to have you back again. So Janice Piemengo,
00:35:22.960 thank you so much. I'm Candice Malcolm. And this is The Candice Malcolm Show.