Juno News - September 22, 2023


New centrist party seeks to act as counter-weight to Poilievre


Episode Stats


Length

15 minutes

Words per minute

208.74458

Word count

3,264

Sentence count

161

Harmful content

Misogyny

1

sentences flagged

Toxicity

2

sentences flagged

Hate speech

6

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

A new political party has been formed in Canada, and is trying to fill a void that the status quo is not addressing. It s called Canadian Future, and it s being led in the interim by New Brunswick MP Dominic Carty, who joins me to talk about what the party is all about.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 But I do want to talk about this story that came about this week, which is a bit of a
00:00:14.680 deviation from what we've been talking about the rest of the show, which makes it a good
00:00:17.760 note to end on for the week. A new political party. Now, I should say that there are a great
00:00:23.760 many political parties in this country. You've got the Communist Party, the Marxist-Leninist
00:00:27.640 Party. I think there was a marijuana party at one point. So you've got a bunch of parties
00:00:31.940 that don't really do anything and are kind of just existing on paper only. And then you
00:00:36.820 have parties that come on and they want to make a splash because they feel they are filling
00:00:41.300 a void that the status quo is not addressing. And that is what this new initiative seeks
00:00:47.840 to do. It is a party formed by the folks behind Centre Ice Canadians, which was formerly Centre
00:00:53.100 Ice Conservatives. It is called Canadian Future and is being led in the interim by New Brunswick
00:00:58.560 MLA Dominic Carty, who joins me now. Dominic, good to talk to you. Thanks for coming on today.
00:01:04.100 Hey, thanks for having me on the show. Appreciate it.
00:01:06.000 So let me just ask first and foremost, I know this is being presented as a centrist party,
00:01:10.820 which is a term you often hear kind of appropriated by both sides. Do you view this as a party for
00:01:17.240 Conservatives that don't like Pierre Polly ever or Liberals who don't like Justin Trudeau?
00:01:21.480 Well, we'll take both and lots of other people who are fed up with politics in general. We've had
00:01:26.200 some support coming even from other parties because there's, I think, a feeling that we've
00:01:31.660 ended up with kind of a mushy politics where you've got this kind of sterile debate about left versus
00:01:36.540 right based on a 200 plus year old idea about how we should run our economies. We've got 100 plus
00:01:41.940 years now of ideas and evidence about how to run mixed economies. We know that's generally what
00:01:47.360 works. To me, the big fight right now is about, do we have an open society or a closed society?
00:01:52.080 Do we fall in line with the models of governments that we're seeing pushed by the Chinese and the 1.00
00:01:56.220 Russians around the world, clearly trying to influence Canada directly and indirectly?
00:02:00.540 And do we have a party based on evidence? Because I think that's something that
00:02:04.100 all the parties have slipped away from as the years of left-wing postmodernism made truth somewhat
00:02:09.920 relative. And that's now being a mantra embraced by the right, where we have,
00:02:13.280 unfortunately, Mr. Pollyer, out campaigning Max Bernier, talking about the World Economic Forum
00:02:18.400 and how apparently it's running our lives, which has got to be one of the daftest things I've ever 0.74
00:02:22.380 heard. And I'm getting kind of fed up with people saying that Canadians aren't responsible for what
00:02:25.760 happens in Canada. We're not subject to shadowy foreign influences. We're a sovereign country. We can
00:02:30.980 make this place better. We built it. We can fix it.
00:02:33.860 Oftentimes when people call themselves centrist, they usually kind of cloak it in saying they're
00:02:39.720 fiscally conservative and socially liberal, which I find is somewhat counterintuitive because it
00:02:44.220 still sort of falls into that left-right dichotomy here. How do you define what a centrist is in the
00:02:50.700 context of what your party seeks to be? Yeah, although I think that these definitions
00:02:54.360 change, right? And you look at the Soviet Union, it was pretty damn left when it came to the economy,
00:02:58.760 but it was also pretty right-wing when it came to social structures. It was not the land of free love
00:03:05.380 and progressivism that some of its modern day young adherents like to imagine that it was.
00:03:10.060 So when I say center, I'm talking about being a radical centrist. So I'm not talking about some
00:03:15.420 mushy middle with softened down versions of policies taken from the old lines, supposedly left,
00:03:20.380 supposedly right parties. I'm talking about the sharp end of the arrow, getting some really aggressive
00:03:25.820 policies in Canada that will help to fix some programs that we have, but also really change the
00:03:30.100 direction of the country. Because I think people are kind of tired after a number of years of Mr.
00:03:34.040 Trudeau's cheerful and somewhat empty ways. And I think that's why Mr. Polyev is doing well in
00:03:39.600 the polls. But I'd have to hope again that at some point, either he shapes up and stops spreading
00:03:43.920 conspiracy theories and starts actually sharing some real solutions, or that we'll be there to
00:03:48.700 help try and fill that void. Because there's got to be something better than having two parties,
00:03:52.760 neither of whom accept that there's such a thing as reality.
00:03:55.720 I wonder how true that is, though. I mean, Pierre Polyev won the conservative leadership with a
00:04:01.420 resounding margin. I mean, even Stephen Harper, who was the founding prime minister and founding
00:04:07.760 leader of the party, he had 69% of the support of members. You also have the conservatives polling
00:04:14.240 right now at 40 some odd percent, which in Canada is a pretty significant margin. So where is the
00:04:22.080 political homelessness that you're describing of people that are uncomfortable with the conservatives
00:04:26.820 as an alternative to the liberals? Well, uncomfortable with the conservatives and the liberals. We did a
00:04:31.420 big poll about five months, I think, ago now, and over 2,000 people across the country. And the numbers
00:04:38.540 came back pretty much evenly on the both liberal and Tory side, people saying they felt their parties were
00:04:43.200 both of them becoming more extreme, less representative of their values, less interested in talking about
00:04:48.280 actual plans to fix the country's problems, more interested in scoring points off of their opponents.
00:04:52.760 And the sentiments about that were just about even on both sides. You had stronger core base support
00:04:58.760 for Mr. Polyev, which makes sense because I think in the end he became leader, and not to compare him
00:05:03.640 too closely, but through the same sort of process that Mr. Trump became Republican nominee in the States
00:05:07.740 by reaching out to a lot of people who'd never been involved in politics before, which on the one hand is
00:05:12.400 great because we need to get people engaged. And one of the things that kills democracies is when people
00:05:16.800 give up on it. But at the same time, when you use social media and the algorithms that drive
00:05:22.420 increasing divisiveness, conflict and extremism, which is literally built into the algorithm because
00:05:26.660 human beings like seeing fights and battles and arguments and people being grumpy with each other,
00:05:31.460 that when you fall down that rabbit hole, it's hard to know when to stop. And I assume that's how we
00:05:35.460 had a Mr. Polyev starting off pretty calm and reasonable, a guy with years of parliamentary experience,
00:05:40.980 who I know a lot of his colleagues had great respect for him, and now is out there out loonying Max
00:05:46.820 Bernier talking about the World Economic Forum and vaccine conspiracies and other things like that,
00:05:51.460 that I just don't, it's, we're not going to be able to hold our civilisation.
00:05:54.180 What vaccine conspiracies has Polyev spoken about?
00:05:58.340 Let's go through the list. He has actually officially said that regardless of the conditions,
00:06:03.700 under no circumstances would Canada ever introduce the measures that we saw during the COVID pandemic.
00:06:09.860 How is that a conspiracy theory though? You can disagree with it, but if he's saying he's
00:06:15.780 against vaccine mandates, I don't see how that's a conspiracy theory.
00:06:19.220 Let's imagine a world where Mr. Polyev is prime minister and we have an outbreak of a disease
00:06:23.300 with let's say five times the fatality rate of COVID, 10%. You honestly think he's not going to put
00:06:28.580 a mandate in place? You honestly think that's an honest statement about what he intends to do if that
00:06:33.140 situation comes up? Of course not. So lying to achieve political points is something that
00:06:39.060 I personally really believe is at the heart of why we're seeing populist movements rise up around
00:06:43.620 the Western world because people are mad about elites lying to them. But if you try and replace
00:06:48.340 those same disconnected elites, which the Liberal Party and Mr. Trudeau represent absolutely pitch
00:06:53.460 perfectly. But if you try and replace them with just another set of adjustable facts that aren't
00:06:58.260 necessarily grounded in reality, we're just contributing to the problem and it's going to make things worse.
00:07:02.820 And he'll have a lot of supporters if he doesn't get in and follow through on some of the things
00:07:07.060 he's campaigned on as opposition leader. And I think that any party that doesn't campaign in
00:07:10.820 opposition the way it intends to govern is being fundamentally dishonest and contributing to
00:07:14.660 degrading democracy. Political parties, I think, generally tend to be followers more than leaders
00:07:19.780 on a lot of issues in general. I mean, you even mentioned that your initiative did polling. You wanted
00:07:23.380 to see where Canadians were before you took a particular course, which I think is reasonable.
00:07:28.180 A lot of the things you're talking about that you don't like about the Conservatives are things that
00:07:31.860 there is a constituency for that is supporting the Conservatives. So is your problem not with where
00:07:38.420 Canadians are rather than where the Conservative Party of Canada is?
00:07:41.620 No, because there's no other option right now. That if we've got this large chunk of the population
00:07:46.100 that say that they've traditionally voted Liberal or Conservative, in some cases going back and forth,
00:07:50.180 as lots of people do, or with the other smaller parties, that they're saying that there is no option
00:07:54.580 that brings together people who, just to list a couple of examples, believe that climate change is real,
00:07:59.620 want to fix it, don't believe that throwing money at problems is the way to fix it.
00:08:05.060 Following down on that policy, we have a real, not a lead anymore, because we gave it up,
00:08:10.340 but we have an established nuclear industry. If we're talking about a climate crisis,
00:08:14.020 why aren't we aggressively building nuclear power plants and exporting them around the world so that
00:08:17.540 we can make Canadian jobs, make Canadian money, help do our part to reduce carbon emissions,
00:08:22.260 and help other countries that contribute way more than we do to the carbon emissions,
00:08:25.700 to cut them down. I don't care what the cause of climate change is, it's happening right now,
00:08:29.700 and if the basic science says that reducing carbon is going to help mitigate it, I'd rather
00:08:33.700 have a slightly cooler planet where we can figure out how to handle the swimming, usually nuclear
00:08:39.140 power plants, creating a minuscule amount of nuclear waste, all the waste in the world,
00:08:43.220 I think, would fit into two Olympic-sized swimming pools, all of them created since the 1940s.
00:08:47.460 So right there, no one's talking about that in a serious way. That's got to be something that
00:08:52.020 happens in the next mandate if the people who are most pessimistic about climate change are
00:08:57.140 wrong. And if people believe they're right, regardless of whether you do or not, in the end,
00:09:02.260 that means that there is an opportunity to make money and an opportunity to address people's fears
00:09:06.820 in something that's going to make the world better by actually reducing the emissions and hopefully
00:09:11.140 reducing the horrible summer that we had with the floods and the fires raging across the country.
00:09:16.260 Let's make some money off this, make the world a better place, but to have a party that's fighting
00:09:20.580 against the idea that we should transition to a new post-petrol economy. It's like campaigning
00:09:25.220 100 years ago against transitioning to the petrol economy. I mean, it doesn't make any sense.
00:09:30.740 If you're generally someone looking to advance your country 100 plus years ago and you're saying,
00:09:34.900 you know what, guys? I think the Amish have got the right idea. Let's stick with the horse and 1.00
00:09:38.340 buggy. Let's avoid those fancy newfangled cars. Humans are supposed to progress and innovate. Let's 0.93
00:09:42.740 put money into research and development to deal with the climate issue, bring scientists to Canada.
00:09:46.980 That sort of industry always has a knockoff and helps us in all kinds of other sectors. That's
00:09:50.500 just one example. Then we could talk about defense and international affairs.
00:09:53.620 Yeah. Well, just on the climate, though, for a moment, if your belief is that this is the hole
00:09:58.980 in Canadian politics right now, how do you explain-
00:10:01.140 No, no, no. That's one issue.
00:10:03.380 Yeah, but this party and this movement and this radically centrist approach,
00:10:06.740 how do you explain the 2021 election when Aaron O'Toole did exactly what you're describing on
00:10:12.020 climate? He came out with a conservative answer. He said, climate change is real. It's a problem.
00:10:17.380 And here's what we're going to do. There was going to be a cost associated with that.
00:10:21.220 He really kept a lot of the conservative policies that the conservative flank of the
00:10:26.820 party were trying to push forward at bay. And he completely fell short in winning the election.
00:10:32.980 So how do you explain the 2021 election when the conservatives really did exactly what you're
00:10:39.460 saying they needed to do? Because no one trusted Aaron O'Toole because he campaigned one way when
00:10:44.580 he was campaigning to be leader in an opposition and then tried another way when he was campaigning
00:10:48.980 to be prime minister. And I think Canadians are smart and they could tell that he wasn't being
00:10:53.140 consistent in his messaging. So there's a real fear that when the conservatives are saying one thing
00:10:58.340 that sounds a little bit more moderate, that they're actually talking about something much more
00:11:01.300 extreme. And when you have the conservative party candidate outlooting the Bernier candidate in the
00:11:08.020 Winnipeg by-election, Manitoba by-election recently. By opposing vaccine mandates?
00:11:12.340 No, by in that case saying that Max Bernier was a tool of the globalists who went to WEF meetings
00:11:18.100 and Pierre Polyarif would never allow that to happen. I'm sorry to keep on going on about the WEF.
00:11:22.180 But since you do, let's drill into this because, you know, Justin Trudeau this morning is at the UN
00:11:29.300 talking about the virtues of a carbon tax. I've covered the World Economic Forum. I've been there
00:11:34.500 reporting on it. You'll often times hear people talk about all the great things they need to do.
00:11:39.860 Pardon me? Did you get the microchip implanted? You all set? No, no, I didn't. I needed to stay a day
00:11:44.580 late for that. But they talk about all of these very aggressive and I would say very radical
00:11:48.420 environmental proposals. So is your position that you cannot criticize that without being loony?
00:11:54.020 You can absolutely criticize it. Let me start right now. The WEF is an expensive talking shop of rich
00:11:59.860 people trying to make themselves feel relevant in a way that is, in terms of the way it actually
00:12:03.940 impacts power politics around the world, nearly completely meaningless. Anyone really think that
00:12:08.740 anyone's going to listen to what Iran has to say about women's rights or that Somalia has to say 0.72
00:12:14.260 about climate change? It's a talking shop that allows occasional serious work to happen. I'm talking
00:12:18.660 about the UN in this case, but most of the time it's a vast waste of time and money and is controlled
00:12:23.140 by dictators. How is that different from what Paulie ever said about the WEF?
00:12:27.620 And what's that? How is that different from what
00:12:29.780 Pierre Paulie ever said about the WEF? Because Pierre Paulie ever goes on about globalists,
00:12:33.940 which is code for anti-Semitism. Pierre Paulie ever said that he will not allow his ministers,
00:12:38.500 you talk about freeing people to do what they want. Okay, hold up, hold up. Are you accusing
00:12:42.580 Pierre Paulie of being anti-Semitic? Let me finish. If I can finish my answer,
00:12:45.780 I'll come back to that. Okay. That the WEF, he's not going to allow any of his ministers or
00:12:50.180 government officials to attend any of the meetings of the WEF. That's his great stand
00:12:53.620 against the globalist threat that's threatening all of Canada. This is rubbish. Canada is not broken, 0.99
00:13:00.500 and we are not under the sway of some shadowy foreign tentacled octopus that's trying to
00:13:05.060 dominate our lives. Anything wrong in Canada, we can fix. We fixed things before. We built this
00:13:09.940 country out of the ice and the snow. We can do it again to face these new challenges in the 21st
00:13:14.660 century. What we don't need is people dog-whistling anti-Semitic tropes. And anyone who does
00:13:20.100 think the attacks on George Soros and the WEF don't have an anti-Semitic tangent to them needs
00:13:24.660 to go and read a little bit more about anti-Semitism. Okay, let me be perfectly 0.99
00:13:28.900 frank. Do you believe Pierre Paulie is anti-Semitic? I have no idea. I know that his party is peddling
00:13:34.260 tropes that have their roots in anti-Semitism. His party, which has been one of the most stalwart
00:13:38.660 defenders of Israel for the entirety of its existence, you think is going down the road of anti-Semitism?
00:13:43.860 I would ask you how the folks in the Republican Party, who were similarly stalwart supporters of
00:13:49.780 Israel for most of Israel's history, and have now become infected with populists who are largely
00:13:55.300 influenced by ideas coming in from other countries, namely Russia, who are spreading a radical anti-Western
00:14:00.980 agenda in the guise of traditional Western values. And unfortunately, we're seeing that picked up by
00:14:05.620 elements of the Conservative Party. And it's why a lot of people don't feel comfortable with the
00:14:09.060 Conservative Party. And one of the reasons Andrew Scheer didn't win in 2021, despite people being
00:14:13.700 increasingly fed up with Justin Trudeau. I think I will get a lot of angry emails from Jewish 1.00
00:14:19.940 supporters of the Conservative Party that don't see what you're describing there.
00:14:24.020 I can again, go and look at the tropes, the stuff that's been shared around the WF,
00:14:29.140 globalism and George Soros. Go and do a tiny bit of reading produced by B'nai B'ris and the other 0.96
00:14:34.500 Jewish advocacy organizations talking about how this is part of the global rise in anti-Semitism.
00:14:40.340 And then those folks are welcome to contact me and I'll happily debate them on the subject.
00:14:44.260 Just getting to the forward-looking part of your party here, as we're already over time,
00:14:48.660 are you planning to field a full slate of candidates in the next election?
00:14:52.420 Wait, we'll see. I mean, that's my job the next year is to build up the party as the interim leader.
00:14:56.180 I had some background doing that and work overseas. I worked with dozens of different parties in
00:15:01.140 different countries. If I can get the party up and running and we're able to be prepared with
00:15:05.300 a full slate, that's awesome. Our goal is on quality more than anything else. We want to
00:15:09.140 try and restore the idea that becoming a member of parliament is a serious business.
00:15:12.740 Make sure that we offer candidates a lot of training on how the parliamentary system works,
00:15:16.900 the people who are going to try and rip them off, scam them and the public. There's a lot of
00:15:20.580 things that can be done to make sure we have a better legislature rather than pretending our
00:15:23.620 institutions are broken. Dominic Cardi, Interim Leader of Canadian Future. Thank you for coming on.
00:15:28.660 Hey, thanks. Thanks for listening to The Andrew Lawton Show.
00:15:32.580 Support the program by donating to True North at www.tnc.news.