Juno News - February 04, 2024


On C2C: Was the pandemic caused by science?


Episode Stats


Length

18 minutes

Words per minute

166.9616

Word count

3,145

Sentence count

4

Harmful content

Hate speech

6

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Margaret Kapala and Andrew Lawton discuss the possibility that science itself may have been to blame for a pandemic that could have been caused by science itself. In this episode of the Andrew Lawton Show, Dr. Lawton is joined by public policy analyst Margaret Kapala to discuss a fascinating essay from the journal The C2C journal written by Public Policy Analyst Margareth Kapala that suggests that science may have actually caused the pandemic known as "Covid19."

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 you're tuned in to the andrew lawton show
00:00:05.880 welcome back to the andrew lawton show well what has been one of the most common refrains
00:00:14.560 of the last few years some variation of trust the science or follow the science as though science is
00:00:21.720 this universal and clear oracle that we can all take our cues from on anything and everything well
00:00:27.700 was science itself the problem in a way there was a fascinating essay from the c2c journal written by
00:00:36.060 public policy analyst margaret kapala that makes that very point the essay is called a pandemic
00:00:42.720 caused by science with a i've tried to do the inflection there so as to indicate the question
00:00:48.300 mark at the end of the uh piece's title there but it was a fascinating read and i thought i would dig
00:00:53.220 into it with margaret herself who joins me now margaret wonderful to talk to you thanks so much
00:00:57.420 for coming on today my pleasure now let's refer to let's talk first off about what it is you're
00:01:04.500 referring to and you say or suggest that science itself may have been to blame what are you getting
00:01:09.480 at the crux of the argument boils down to the use of a technology called gainer function science and
00:01:19.900 what gainer function is it involves the pulling together of different viruses and taking out
00:01:26.760 different bits of them splicing and dicing them so that you come up with the worst and worst of
00:01:33.080 each virus so you end up with a synthetic virus that has the attributes of the of the other two
00:01:41.080 now in this case it does look uh it is near certainty that gain-of-function technology was involved
00:01:48.760 involved in the whatever was going on at the wuhan of labs uh uh and between american and and chinese
00:01:59.720 scientists um in in wuhan um working on this mysterious virus which turned out in the end to have all the
00:02:08.440 properties of of sars cov2 uh which of course as we know is the final cause of covid19 that i mean let's
00:02:20.120 talk about that lab for a moment because at the beginning we were all told that the culprit was a
00:02:25.080 bat or a pangolin basically was uh some you know horrendous twist of fate that led to a very unfortunate
00:02:31.880 situation at one of the wet markets in wuhan and very early on people were skeptical of that and
00:02:38.360 suggested that this could have been a creation of a lab intentionally or unintentionally leaked and
00:02:44.440 what was fascinating with that argument is that as more and more evidence mounted this thing that was
00:02:50.440 a conspiracy theory at some point in 2022 or 2020 has effectively become an accepted fact or at least
00:02:58.520 the most plausible scenario here now do we do we know anything beyond that as far as was this
00:03:06.200 carelessness was it perhaps intentional difficult to say everybody is erring on the side of giving the
00:03:16.600 chinese you know giving the chinese a lot of leeway that is that it was an accidental release or an 0.99
00:03:23.560 accidental leak uh release implies it wasn't accidental accidental leak and um i mean certainly you know
00:03:32.600 whether this is done in in the name of a prudent geopolitical uh maneuvering or whether it's it's it's a
00:03:40.760 it's a kind another kind of cover-up we we won't ever know my my sense is that both the chinese and
00:03:50.200 the americans are caught in a in a stalemate of mutual culpability that is in the sense that
00:03:58.680 we knew know for certain that the americans funded the the the work that was going on in wuhan uh
00:04:07.160 through a series of elaborate on arcane roundabout ways of getting money to wuhan um uh through a
00:04:15.400 uh uh an intermediary called echo health alliance um an ngo that an ngo so so a the americans financed
00:04:26.200 it there are people coming out and saying that boldly although not everybody the official word from
00:04:32.600 the american government is that they hadn't that they had nothing to do with it but there are some who
00:04:38.120 are being intellectually honest like for instance robert redfield who was the former um former director of
00:04:44.760 the uh center for disease control of one of the arch agencies within the american government on the
00:04:51.640 health side who was saying out out loud and in your face we funded it um and then on the other hand you
00:05:00.120 had the work that was going on in wuhan which is not being denied by by the chinese xi jeng li who's the
00:05:06.680 chief scientist again a geneticist of mary uh an accomplished geneticist again the tech who's good
00:05:14.840 at the splicing and the dicing of genes um and she's not denying that they did the work there but
00:05:20.840 she is denying that it was their fault or that it was ever leaked and she's saying no no no it came from
00:05:27.480 it came from the bats over in this mine and and uh that's that was the real source at least that's the
00:05:33.640 last excuse i've heard from her on this one so but but yes now in all fairness you know it made a lot
00:05:42.680 of sense to think in the first instance that it might have come from an animal or animal or bat host
00:05:49.160 um this is where a lot of pandemics have come from this is what the what the spanish the spanish flu
00:05:55.880 was originated with you know flea infested rodents and they jumped to that then jumped to the to
00:06:04.520 humans uh so this is not abnormal for this kind of thing to happen i mean just even thinking in terms
00:06:11.000 of rabies i mean that's virus that jumps to a human from an animal so i mean it made sense for a lot of
00:06:16.280 people to think that right away so fair enough but you know getting down to brass tacks and getting into the
00:06:25.000 science of the actual virus itself and the fact that it has certain genetic components which now
00:06:32.760 other scientists have sliced and diced and said hey wait a minute uh this looks like it was pretty
00:06:40.040 well man-made and now even since the writing of my article there has been additional information has come
00:06:46.840 out you'll remember in the article i refer to two key key scientific papers nobody was hiding
00:06:54.760 this by the way that this science was going on uh papers dating way back to 2005 and you know they
00:07:01.160 were looking for viruses in bats and and and the genui and and a um a renowned geneticist uh located in
00:07:11.720 the university of north carolina ralph barrick they had been working together for quite some time
00:07:16.440 on stuff like this um so uh you know nobody was being untoward or or or uh you know trying to hide
00:07:25.880 anything here uh there were two papers that were absolutely devastating one that said hey we've
00:07:34.520 created this great thing a chimera we've come we figured out how to put two viruses together to come up
00:07:40.040 with a virus that's even worse um and in this case it was pulling together the elements of the
00:07:46.440 sars virus which caused the pandemic in 2002 to 2004. they took that virus and then spliced and diced it 0.99
00:07:54.440 with another virus we're not sure where that one came from and lo and behold um it came out looking
00:08:01.720 an awful lot like sars covi-2 or at least became so so it's covi-2 i i want to just go back to the
00:08:07.640 fundamentals here because i mean it's easy when you're talking about a term that's not familiar
00:08:12.120 to people which i think gain of function is is certainly or a few years ago was not familiar to a
00:08:17.160 lot of people and you're describing the function very very calmly and very accurately but a lot of
00:08:21.720 people would hear this and be like what on earth would you expect to happen if you're mucking around
00:08:26.920 in the engine room like that and i'm wondering what are the noble intentions of this if there
00:08:32.200 if there were to be any or is it about uh trying to understand uh the the virulence of these things
00:08:38.200 to protect against them because certainly it's easy to understand in a military context or a
00:08:43.160 bio-warfare context what the value of this is what's their defense for why they're doing this research
00:08:49.000 in the first place and why it justifies the alliance between united states scientists and chinese
00:08:54.360 scientists well ostensibly it was to create the gain of function is is justified by the argument that
00:09:04.440 if you create a a virus then you can create the vaccine that will address it if it ever whatever
00:09:11.720 reason becomes you are willing the virus into existence that might never have appeared in doing
00:09:17.400 that yeah what's you know the point is here here we are dealing with the virus that never would have
00:09:22.440 existed unless these scientists have put it together in the first place so hey reading the uh the the
00:09:29.080 second paper the diffuse paper i refer to two papers the second paper that came out and actually new
00:09:33.960 information has just come out since it was since um uh since i wrote the article and again what they
00:09:40.760 were apparently trying what they argued that they were trying to do is they were trying to put together a
00:09:45.880 a virus that would reinfect bats and make them uh in turn immune and unable to then pass on the virus okay
00:09:58.600 there was some sort of immunological thing that they were trying to hoping to achieve where bat populations
00:10:04.520 were concerned because bats are the largest amount largest uh population of mammals that harbor this the
00:10:13.960 coronavirus and i mean and there are all kinds of coronaviruses that are done over 200 have been
00:10:19.080 recognized but i mean apparently there are estimates they're in the thousands of kinds of coronaviruses that
00:10:23.880 are out there and some with varying degrees of of lethality so so that was one argument about why it
00:10:32.040 was necessary to do this um the second argument and the more common one is that um that it is there to
00:10:40.760 create you know you create something so that you can create a vaccine to deal with it and now you can
00:10:46.520 see how this would make sense in a military set in in a military context i mean if if you've got people
00:10:53.160 out there enemies um enemies uh who are uh developing their own biological uh warfare you know biological
00:11:03.400 weapons and you've got to try to anticipate what the heck they are trying to going to hit you with and so
00:11:09.880 you want to come up with a vaccine that's actually going to um to deal with it all that makes some
00:11:17.000 sense um the but there was a point but the bigger risk is in all of that is you know in the course of
00:11:26.360 doing this you end up with what we ended up with with covid well and also just to jump in there margaret if
00:11:33.880 i may i mean the idea of developing that to protect against what your enemies may do with
00:11:39.800 china who maybe we don't call an enemy but is certainly not a friend does not strike me as the 0.99
00:11:45.560 wisest course of that and i mean in canada we've certainly seen front and center about what happens
00:11:49.720 when you let people affiliated with the chinese regime into our top security labs absolutely absolutely 0.68
00:11:57.160 so no and none of this makes any sense whatsoever i mean and there are various theories about why and
00:12:03.240 how this might have taken place that it was a cia covert operation of some kind we were trying to
00:12:08.280 figure out what was going on in their labs and they they could talk on us they ended up as usual with
00:12:15.080 our technology right yeah so now they have all this this gain of function technology with which and
00:12:20.840 i'm sure they're underway you know the gain of function technology xi zhang li knows everything
00:12:27.160 that ralph barrett knows and hey uh and she's the she's the coronavirus authority she can actually go
00:12:34.840 out i mean she's got immediate access to all kinds of bats there are a prodigious number of bat caves in
00:12:42.280 in china so the um so you know none of it really makes a lot of sense and and and and which is all
00:12:50.920 the more worrying because if you could ascribe some clear motive to what was going on it might be easier
00:12:59.000 to deal with the one thing that is clear out of all this is what do we do about these gain of function
00:13:04.440 um uh labs because this is going on everywhere it's not just in china um as redfield pointed out
00:13:11.400 universities everywhere are playing around tinkering around with these viruses and this
00:13:16.440 this these kinds of technologies and yes there are uh root leaks are routine these are not i didn't
00:13:24.920 mention that in the article but i mean i think there's something like 200 lab leaks every you know every
00:13:29.800 few years um and okay they don't count anything but one might and all that takes is one right that's
00:13:39.240 right that's right absolutely so so yes um um now i mean the other side of the whole whole equation is
00:13:48.440 not just that this virus was created and somehow rather got out into the into the world you know
00:13:55.400 the other side of the equation is how the world reacted then and that's equally disturbing i found that
00:14:01.240 very disturbing as well well yes and and that i mean has been covered exhaustively on this show not
00:14:07.240 nearly enough by i would say legacy media sources and c2c journal and yourself have been very strong
00:14:13.080 on that and i it's easy to point the finger at you know the american government and you know the
00:14:17.960 fauci regime and all of that and certainly easy to point the finger at the chinese canada has never 0.53
00:14:22.840 been immune from this no pun intended i i mean i mentioned the the case of canada and uh china
00:14:28.520 cooperating at that bio lab in winnipeg but but canada has been a part of a lot of these you know
00:14:33.880 cross-cultural exchanges of research as well has it not yes absolutely and um i mean and it looks
00:14:40.520 like we're going to get even more if the if the who pandemic treaty goes through because they'll be
00:14:46.760 calling on everybody all the global partners to go get out there and gather up their viruses and send
00:14:55.160 them into their labs and by the way send them also to the who uh where the where the major pharmaceutical
00:15:01.960 companies will of course have a lot of fun with them as well we'll see it all over again so this
00:15:08.600 is very disturbing and i and i you know if if at one level certainly the big issue that needs to be
00:15:16.600 discussed here is whether or not we should be doing this stuff at all uh president obama uh called a
00:15:24.440 moratorium on gain-of-function research well it was at that point then that they figured out how to use an
00:15:30.040 ng-o to get the funding to another part of the world to keep doing it yeah they just start outsourcing 0.99
00:15:37.480 it at that point and it makes it worse because you lose that oversight and transparency that that
00:15:41.720 normally existed exactly so you know that that so there was that certain big big downside from from that
00:15:50.120 but but the question then becomes well how do you monitor this how do you guarantee you know
00:15:55.080 the check for safety and and what have you incidentally we had in what we do know about
00:16:01.880 wuhan is that most of the work was done in substandard biosafety securities at labs they had a fabulous
00:16:09.480 new lab a bsl highest level safety a new lab had been built um very recently but it turns out most of
00:16:18.520 the work on on the sars viruses were being done in biosafety lab two and three so again you know
00:16:27.640 how do you monitor how do you how do you keep track of all of this and how do you why are we allowing this
00:16:33.480 so there there are i mean reading and reviewing the voluminous evidence to date there are really two
00:16:40.680 paths that are facing governments i mean you could look at this and say what you're saying which is
00:16:45.160 this is a cautionary tale we should not do this type of research not put ourselves in in this
00:16:50.520 uh position again but i i fear that too many lawmakers and and so-called experts are doing the
00:16:55.640 opposites and saying ah see this is why we need to do the research this is why we need to do it and
00:17:01.240 they're looking at the same premise and and correct me if i'm wrong margaret but they're drawing the
00:17:05.560 opposite conclusion exactly and and as redfield says you know the next pandemic will come from a lab
00:17:12.520 somewhere and it'll be worse and who knows whether or not we can or will be ready for it let's hope we
00:17:19.240 are and and and heaven knows we've had a lot of salutary lessons to be obtained from our past
00:17:26.680 experience here uh not least that that individual health authorities really really need to drill down
00:17:33.320 and decide and you know take all this information in and decide really where they stand on it
00:17:39.240 because what ended up happening last time was the americans and the pharmaceutical companies
00:17:44.680 ran slipshod over everybody and uh without without offering fully tested vaccines and of course we're
00:17:54.600 still paying for that and we're likely to pay for that for a long time with our health health conditions
00:18:00.600 so there's a lot to think about here and i'm hoping that that the our health authorities are having this
00:18:07.480 discussion and our governments are having these discussions and at the at at the most local
00:18:14.120 level which is where these discussions have to take place and where decisions need to take place
00:18:18.360 and the great believer in subsidiarity you know decisions at the local level not at the global level
00:18:24.120 for sure yeah we can all agree on that i i would hope uh a pandemic caused by science is an essay in
00:18:31.080 c2c journal you could read written by margaret coppalla who's with me now margaret thank you so much for
00:18:36.200 your time on this really appreciate it good to be here thanks andrew thanks for listening to the
00:18:40.200 andrew lawton show support the program by donating to true north at www.tnc.news