ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- October 25, 2021
O’Toole caves on vaccine mandates for MPs
Episode Stats
Length
19 minutes
Words per Minute
195.23671
Word Count
3,790
Sentence Count
207
Misogynist Sentences
1
Hate Speech Sentences
2
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.360
Every major political party in Canada is the exact same.
00:00:04.400
Vaccine mandates are the latest policy that they all agree on.
00:00:07.400
I'm Candice Malcolm and this is The Candice Malcolm Show.
00:00:14.700
Hi everyone, thank you so much for tuning into the program.
00:00:17.080
Thank you for your support of The Candice Malcolm Show.
00:00:19.460
I hope everyone out there had a wonderful weekend.
00:00:21.580
Hope you got to spend some time with your families out there.
00:00:24.840
Today I want to talk about the uninspiring sameness of Canada's political parties,
00:00:29.560
the uninspiring sameness.
00:00:30.860
I had a column over in the Toronto Sun over the weekend with the same title,
00:00:34.420
put it up on True North, and I want to go through my argument on that.
00:00:39.480
But first, if you enjoy The Candice Malcolm Show, if you like what we do here at True North,
00:00:43.280
please head on over to tnc.news slash donate.
00:00:46.540
Consider making a small, modest donation to help keep our programming going.
00:00:50.940
We don't take any money from the government.
00:00:52.400
We are one of the rare journalistic outlets, one of the rare media companies in Canada
00:00:56.100
that does not take money from the Trudeau government.
00:00:58.700
There are only a small handful of us out there.
00:01:01.320
And if you like the idea of independent journalism,
00:01:03.480
if you think that it is important to have a separation between politics
00:01:07.860
and the politicians trying to earn your vote
00:01:10.080
and the media and the journalists who are covering those politicians,
00:01:13.180
if you think it's a conflict of interest that the former pays the latter,
00:01:16.960
you have to support independent journalism like the journalists here at True North.
00:01:21.000
So please consider making a donation.
00:01:22.840
If you're watching this video on YouTube right now,
00:01:24.340
don't forget to like this video, leave us a comment,
00:01:26.540
let us know what you think about the show.
00:01:28.080
Don't forget to subscribe to True North and hit that little red notification bell
00:01:31.500
so that you never miss a show.
00:01:33.120
If you're watching on Facebook, do the same thing.
00:01:34.840
Please like this video, leave us a comment, let us know what you think of the show.
00:01:38.840
And don't forget to like our True North page as well.
00:01:42.200
And finally, if you're listening to this show in podcast form
00:01:45.320
and you like the Candace Malcolm Show, you enjoy the program,
00:01:47.820
please head on over and leave us a five-star review,
00:01:50.920
either on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:01:54.420
And don't forget to subscribe to the Candace Malcolm Show so that you never miss an episode.
00:01:59.220
Okay, so back to our topic today.
00:02:02.000
The political parties are all the same.
00:02:03.780
There's sometimes little differences here and there,
00:02:06.340
and those differences we see are quickly dissolving.
00:02:09.740
The parties are converging.
00:02:11.140
They basically have the same opinion on every single important issue.
00:02:14.720
So this was something that really stood out to me during the federal election.
00:02:17.980
I thought that the most striking feature of the recent federal election
00:02:21.260
was just the pure amount of overlap between the political parties
00:02:24.780
when it came to all of the details in their platforms,
00:02:27.780
but also their overall governing philosophies.
00:02:30.660
We're at the point where we have the liberals, the conservatives,
00:02:34.400
the new Democrats who aren't that new anymore.
00:02:36.180
They're kind of just like U.S. Democrats
00:02:38.000
who are very similar to the liberals here in Canada.
00:02:41.260
The Bloc Quebecois who at least have their own sort of mandate,
00:02:44.840
but when it comes to policies,
00:02:45.980
they agree with everyone else and the Greens,
00:02:49.160
they all have the same opinion on virtually every political issue
00:02:52.000
that matters in Canada.
00:02:53.580
We're at a point where every party thinks
00:02:55.400
that there is a climate catastrophe,
00:02:58.080
that there is a climate crisis,
00:02:59.620
that they're so steeped in climate alarmism.
00:03:02.300
The whole idea of a Green Party seems redundant.
00:03:05.020
The Liberal Party is the Green Party.
00:03:06.780
The NDP Party is the Green Party.
00:03:08.620
And at this point, the Conservative Party is the Green Party,
00:03:11.420
and the Bloc Party is the Green Party.
00:03:12.540
So we saw a huge dip in support for the Green Party,
00:03:16.160
partially because their party is in such turmoil.
00:03:19.000
Their leader was so uninspiring and new to politics,
00:03:22.100
but also just because they're all Green Parties now.
00:03:24.980
So we don't really need this single-issue niche party anymore.
00:03:28.680
The Green Party has succeeded in many ways.
00:03:30.480
Their job is done.
00:03:31.580
Everybody has bought in to this alarmist, over-the-top,
00:03:35.400
the world is ending, the sky is falling, chicken little worldview
00:03:38.340
when it comes to climate,
00:03:39.620
that we don't even need the Green Party anymore
00:03:41.800
because they're all Green Parties.
00:03:43.200
So in some ways, that is a win for Elizabeth May
00:03:46.520
and the people who really built up that Green Party.
00:03:49.340
And when you take a step back
00:03:50.180
and you look at the broader policies in this country
00:03:52.740
on health care, on fiscal federalism,
00:03:54.860
on the idea of official bilingualism,
00:03:57.000
on the basic governing concept of having high taxes,
00:04:00.860
big budgets, budget deficits,
00:04:02.800
a large civil service, the size of the public service,
00:04:05.160
they all agree on it.
00:04:05.980
They also all agree on the ideas behind government child care,
00:04:09.720
affordable housing, reconciliation,
00:04:11.840
truth and reconciliation with First Nations Canadians.
00:04:14.180
Again, the environment.
00:04:15.380
When it comes to immigration,
00:04:16.700
when it comes to foreign policy,
00:04:18.220
gun control, abortion, speech censorship,
00:04:21.200
COVID-19 restrictions, COVID-19 lockdowns,
00:04:23.900
COVID-19 vaccines,
00:04:25.340
and some variation of the idea of universal basic income,
00:04:28.920
which we saw throughout the pandemic.
00:04:30.380
When it comes to all of these policies and more,
00:04:32.460
they all agree.
00:04:33.340
Every single party agrees.
00:04:34.920
They all have the same ideas.
00:04:37.240
So sure, each party has a slightly different way of framing the issues.
00:04:41.620
They tinker with the various rates and rebates.
00:04:43.940
They use slightly different language here and there.
00:04:46.400
But overall, it would be nearly impossible
00:04:48.760
for the average Canadian voter
00:04:50.420
to name the party behind the various big ticket items
00:04:54.140
that we saw in the platforms in the last elections.
00:04:56.800
Let's just go through this.
00:04:57.960
We'll do a little pop quiz here on the Candace Malcolm Show.
00:05:00.380
And you can guess which party was behind various policies
00:05:04.240
that were sort of the big ticket policies for each party.
00:05:07.280
So the first one up.
00:05:08.980
Which party proposed doubling the Canada workers' benefit
00:05:12.380
to give low-wage workers a rebate on their federal income tax?
00:05:16.140
Which party believes that Canadians earning
00:05:19.200
in the lowest income brackets
00:05:20.380
shouldn't pay federal taxes on that,
00:05:22.160
shouldn't pay income taxes,
00:05:23.040
and should get a rebate on tax time?
00:05:24.880
Who knows?
00:05:25.340
I mean, it could be a policy from any of the parties.
00:05:28.340
That one specifically came from the Conservatives, though.
00:05:31.200
So keep track if you got that one right.
00:05:34.760
Question number two.
00:05:35.940
Which party proposed a tax-free savings account
00:05:38.860
for first-time homeowners under the age of 40?
00:05:41.840
So first-time homeowners under the age of 40,
00:05:44.140
you want to save up for down payment.
00:05:46.100
This party proposed creating a special new tax-free savings account
00:05:49.600
so you could put money in there tax-free.
00:05:52.420
Which party was it?
00:05:53.460
And believe it or not, was the Liberals.
00:05:55.600
I know it sounds a bit like a Conservative policy.
00:05:57.780
That's the kind of policy that Stephen Harper used to come up with.
00:06:00.380
Remember, he was the one that came up with the tax-free savings account.
00:06:03.420
Well, the Liberals sort of took a page from the Conservative book
00:06:05.760
in that regard and created this nifty little tax loophole
00:06:08.880
for young first-time homebuyers.
00:06:11.320
Again, that could have been a policy from the Conservatives,
00:06:13.880
could have been a policy from any of the parties, frankly.
00:06:16.800
Finally, question number three.
00:06:17.820
Which of the parties proposed a two-year ban on foreign home ownership,
00:06:23.740
foreign ownership of homes in Canada?
00:06:26.740
Okay, to be fair, that's a bit of a trick question
00:06:28.620
because they basically all agree on that one.
00:06:30.840
Yes, that's right.
00:06:31.640
The Liberals, Conservatives, and the NDP all had some variation
00:06:34.520
of a ban on home ownership for foreign owners.
00:06:38.560
So trick question.
00:06:39.400
Again, they all agree on virtually everything.
00:06:41.840
So let me know what your score was out of three there.
00:06:44.700
But I imagine that, you know, the people who are watching this show,
00:06:48.000
first of all, are pretty tuned in.
00:06:49.340
So you're the political junkies out there.
00:06:51.460
You might score better.
00:06:52.540
My guess is the average Canadian voter probably got a zero out of three,
00:06:57.360
maybe one out of three on that little quiz I came up with.
00:07:00.180
And another example right here.
00:07:01.660
One of the biggest ticket items from the Conservative campaign
00:07:04.780
during the election was this idea that mothers who had just given birth,
00:07:08.820
just had babies and were off work on maternity leave,
00:07:12.080
which new mothers collect EI in Canada.
00:07:14.040
So this idea that women who begin working part-time
00:07:17.960
would still be able to collect the EI maternity leave while working part-time.
00:07:22.840
And so this was sort of billed as this really great pro-family policy
00:07:26.920
by the Conservatives.
00:07:28.020
And a lot of people on social media were saying that it was a great idea.
00:07:30.860
But here's the kicker.
00:07:32.140
The Liberal government apparently already allows this.
00:07:35.100
And so we saw an expert in employment law come out on social media
00:07:39.740
and really demonstrate the point that this great new Conservative policy idea
00:07:44.480
was actually already a policy in Canada under the Liberal government.
00:07:48.440
So it is this uninspiring sameness of the major parties
00:07:53.540
that led us to this status quo election outcome.
00:07:56.720
The outcome of the election was remarkably similar to the result in 2019.
00:08:01.620
So here we had an election two years later.
00:08:04.340
If you follow the campaign closely, like we did here at the Candace Malcolm show,
00:08:07.760
you know that there was a lot of twists and turns.
00:08:09.840
The Trudeau campaign made so many unforced errors on this campaign.
00:08:13.920
Trudeau started very high in the polls.
00:08:16.040
The whole idea of launching this election and triggering it
00:08:18.620
was that Trudeau wanted a majority government.
00:08:20.340
He thought that his handling of the pandemic was going to easily deliver him that.
00:08:24.340
What we saw was that the Canadians, according to polls, if you believe the polls,
00:08:29.420
but what we saw from the polls was that Trudeau was really popular at the beginning.
00:08:33.580
And then as the campaign went on, his support plummeted
00:08:37.080
and it looked like Aaron O'Toole was going to win the election.
00:08:39.900
And then Aaron O'Toole kind of faltered in the final two weeks.
00:08:42.400
I posit that is because he just wouldn't hold his ground.
00:08:45.480
He didn't hold his ground.
00:08:46.300
He flip-flopped on every issue and Canadians saw that as weakness.
00:08:49.260
But at the end of the day, the outcome of the 2021 election
00:08:52.660
was remarkably similar to the 2019 election.
00:08:56.660
And that clearly was because Canadians are just indifferent to the various pitches.
00:09:02.040
And thus, at the end of the day, they just retreated to their old habits.
00:09:05.920
They cast their ballot in the exact same way as they did in the previous election.
00:09:10.180
They're tuned out.
00:09:11.540
They're uninspired.
00:09:12.660
And this is because everything is the same.
00:09:15.380
The political parties have the same views.
00:09:17.380
Now, let me just make one small note here
00:09:19.560
because I know a lot of people in the comment sections
00:09:21.440
are probably making this point already.
00:09:23.540
There is, of course, one exception, one major exception to this rule
00:09:27.020
where every single party has the same view.
00:09:29.180
And that, of course, came by way of Maxime Bernier
00:09:31.800
and the People's Party of Canada.
00:09:33.660
They, to give them credit, ran on a very different set of ideas.
00:09:37.480
So here we had this political system with five mainstream parties,
00:09:41.420
the five parties that are always there,
00:09:42.860
that always get invited to the debates,
00:09:44.580
that are always sort of featured on the legacy media,
00:09:46.700
the liberals, the conservatives, the democrats, the bloc, and the greens.
00:09:51.160
And then now we have this new party, the People's Party,
00:09:53.160
who comes from more of the political right,
00:09:55.320
although they do attract voters from across the spectrum,
00:09:58.480
the sort of protest voters.
00:10:00.020
They created a very different set of issues that they campaigned on.
00:10:03.660
Bernier's ideas were outside the box.
00:10:05.600
And because of this, the media,
00:10:07.540
who also suffer from the exact same toxic groupthink
00:10:11.160
and rigid, boring sameness as the political parties,
00:10:14.380
well, they didn't know what to make of Maxime Bernier.
00:10:16.620
They didn't know what to make of his large followers.
00:10:19.040
And so they demonized Bernier.
00:10:20.840
They slandered Bernier.
00:10:22.120
They called him and his supporters every name in the book.
00:10:25.700
Regardless of all that,
00:10:27.160
because Bernier and the People's Party were different,
00:10:29.620
they managed to nearly triple their vote count in this election.
00:10:33.060
So Bernier and the People's Party did get rewarded
00:10:35.760
in terms of the number of vote casts,
00:10:37.400
but because of our first pass-to-post system,
00:10:39.540
they didn't make any real gains in terms of winning any seats.
00:10:42.920
So I will note that that was the one exception.
00:10:45.740
Thank goodness for Maxime Bernier saying something different.
00:10:48.300
At least it makes it a little more interesting for us
00:10:50.680
tuning in and watching.
00:10:52.340
But, you know, this is sort of the sad point.
00:10:54.560
This is the point of my show today,
00:10:56.360
the point of my article over in the Toronto Sun,
00:10:59.320
is that it was the Conservative Party,
00:11:01.000
the Conservative Party of Canada,
00:11:02.140
that once offered the occasional spark of originality.
00:11:06.080
They were the ones who would occasionally push back
00:11:08.100
against the painful dullness of Canada's political party system.
00:11:12.780
They sometimes resisted the media-induced conformity,
00:11:16.460
and they would say no to the left's latest insistence
00:11:19.340
that we all have the exact same opinion on every single issue.
00:11:22.640
And that is the crux of this whole thing.
00:11:24.340
The left wants absolute ideological conformity.
00:11:27.520
They want everyone to agree on every single thing.
00:11:30.040
And the Conservatives used to say,
00:11:31.540
no, we're okay with having a different view.
00:11:34.180
We don't agree with you on this.
00:11:35.680
But it seems like these Conservatives today,
00:11:37.760
the Conservative Party of Canada today,
00:11:39.460
doesn't do that anymore.
00:11:41.400
They no longer resist the left's conformity push.
00:11:45.420
And now they're just more than happy to conform
00:11:47.660
with the left's ideology on almost everything.
00:11:50.280
So the Conservatives used to push back,
00:11:52.780
even though it was ever so slightly.
00:11:54.140
Oftentimes they would just go along.
00:11:55.840
But sometimes, sometimes we would see them push back.
00:11:59.000
They'd say no to the latest leftist fad,
00:12:01.060
whether that be the fanatical climate alarmism,
00:12:04.200
whether it be the open borders immigration ideas,
00:12:07.800
or recently the idea that Canada has committed
00:12:10.920
the worst forms of crimes against humanity,
00:12:14.300
including genocide.
00:12:15.160
Conservatives would stand up and say,
00:12:16.540
let's bring some common sense to this scenario.
00:12:19.340
And no, we don't agree with these statements,
00:12:22.260
but it appears that those days are behind us.
00:12:24.900
Under Erin O'Toole,
00:12:25.720
the party seems committed to whitewashing itself
00:12:28.740
and becoming a true Big L Liberal Party.
00:12:32.380
Big L Liberal Party.
00:12:33.900
And last week was the latest example of this.
00:12:36.080
So I'm told that there was a very heated meeting,
00:12:38.720
caucus meeting,
00:12:39.280
on the topic of vaccine mandates.
00:12:41.780
The caucus meetings are when
00:12:42.980
all of the elected Conservative MPs get together.
00:12:45.740
They have a meeting.
00:12:46.860
And I'm told that the meeting
00:12:48.560
basically consisted of Erin O'Toole
00:12:50.560
and some of his sort of close allies in the party
00:12:53.200
presenting on this idea that the Conservatives
00:12:55.700
should just go along and get along on vaccine mandates.
00:12:58.580
They should force their MPs to get double vaccinated.
00:13:01.860
And they should just kind of align
00:13:03.120
with what the Liberals believe on that.
00:13:05.080
I'm told there was a lot of pushback,
00:13:06.860
that the MPs in caucus vehemently opposed this idea.
00:13:12.420
And they let it be known to Erin O'Toole
00:13:14.880
that he was not going to be allowed
00:13:17.480
to have this vaccine mandate for caucus.
00:13:20.700
And so as a result of that,
00:13:22.320
we had Blake Richards,
00:13:23.480
who is the Conservative Party whip,
00:13:25.280
come out following the meeting
00:13:26.720
and basically just state that,
00:13:28.500
say that the Conservative Party
00:13:30.240
is not in favor of this idea
00:13:31.940
of forced vaccinations for all MPs.
00:13:34.720
Obviously, there's broader repercussions for this.
00:13:36.840
It's not just about MPs,
00:13:38.040
but once they allow it in Parliament,
00:13:39.620
once they force all the MPs to get vaccinated,
00:13:41.500
it's only a matter of time
00:13:42.640
before every aspect of our society
00:13:44.300
will have this kind of double-vax rule.
00:13:47.240
So the Conservatives were the only holdout,
00:13:49.080
even though it sort of is a distinction
00:13:50.900
without a difference.
00:13:52.120
But here is Blake Richards on CTV
00:13:54.680
explaining the Conservative position.
00:13:56.640
And you can see,
00:13:57.320
I'll play a bit longer of the clip,
00:13:58.760
but you can see how the host
00:14:00.620
is sort of outraged about this idea
00:14:02.780
that the Conservatives are not forcing their MPs
00:14:06.200
to get vaccinated,
00:14:07.040
and they refuse to reveal the vaccine status
00:14:09.280
of members of Parliament
00:14:10.840
in the Conservative caucus.
00:14:12.140
So here's that clip.
00:14:12.840
Well, we've said all along
00:14:14.480
that we believe workplace safety,
00:14:16.120
including in Parliament,
00:14:17.060
can be assured by either vaccination
00:14:19.640
or producing a negative rapid test.
00:14:23.200
So we think that all members of Parliament
00:14:24.780
can safely perform their duties
00:14:26.840
in the House of Commons
00:14:27.620
and in our committee rooms
00:14:28.880
with either a vaccination or a rapid test.
00:14:32.520
I think it's critically important
00:14:33.640
that all members of Parliament
00:14:34.660
are able to participate in person
00:14:37.060
in those sessions
00:14:39.200
and bring forward
00:14:40.600
the really important issues
00:14:41.540
that we need to be dealing with
00:14:42.720
on behalf of our constituents.
00:14:45.720
But, okay,
00:14:47.400
every single person
00:14:48.800
that works in the House of Commons,
00:14:49.920
all the staff,
00:14:50.660
they have to be double vaccinated
00:14:51.760
to get on a plane,
00:14:52.660
you have to be double vaccinated
00:14:53.720
to get on a bus,
00:14:54.460
to train,
00:14:54.820
you've got to be double vaccinated.
00:14:56.960
Can you tell us
00:14:58.600
how many of the Conservative MPs
00:15:00.600
exactly are double vaccinated
00:15:03.360
and how many
00:15:04.140
this is going to be a problem for?
00:15:06.640
Well, I think it's really up
00:15:07.800
to each individual Canadian,
00:15:09.080
including members of Parliament,
00:15:10.100
to decide for themselves
00:15:11.120
whether they want to disclose
00:15:12.240
their personal health information.
00:15:14.740
But, you know,
00:15:15.520
there are other legislatures,
00:15:17.380
for example, in Canada.
00:15:18.820
Ontario is doing this,
00:15:20.200
Saskatchewan is doing this,
00:15:21.260
there may be others as well,
00:15:22.700
where, you know,
00:15:23.640
in order to participate
00:15:24.500
in the chamber,
00:15:25.960
in the legislative chamber,
00:15:27.400
you know,
00:15:27.600
either showing a vaccination status
00:15:29.680
or a negative rapid test.
00:15:32.280
So we believe that
00:15:33.340
it's worked in other jurisdictions.
00:15:35.940
Why can't it be done
00:15:37.320
for our Parliament?
00:15:38.600
I mean, this,
00:15:39.020
what we're talking about here
00:15:40.080
is the,
00:15:41.080
it's the House of Commons.
00:15:42.240
It's the very seat of democracy.
00:15:43.860
People,
00:15:44.520
thousands of Canadians
00:15:45.300
have elected each
00:15:46.300
of these members of Parliament
00:15:47.660
to serve them,
00:15:48.480
to represent them
00:15:49.340
in the House of Commons.
00:15:50.200
And we need,
00:15:51.640
we believe that it needs to be
00:15:53.000
something that all members
00:15:54.720
can do safely
00:15:56.060
in person in the House of Commons
00:15:58.040
and that through rapid testing
00:15:59.800
more vaccination.
00:16:00.300
You could do it.
00:16:01.220
Now, it's just interesting
00:16:02.460
to walk away from this
00:16:03.460
to see that Aaron O'Toole,
00:16:05.100
I'm told,
00:16:05.640
is the one that wants
00:16:06.680
vaccine mandates.
00:16:07.560
He wants the,
00:16:08.180
he has the same view
00:16:08.980
as Justin Trudeau on this,
00:16:10.140
but it is his caucus,
00:16:11.260
the conservative caucus
00:16:12.240
who hold out.
00:16:13.300
So they have a different view
00:16:14.500
on this
00:16:14.960
and I assume a different view
00:16:16.460
on most issues
00:16:17.360
than Aaron O'Toole's.
00:16:18.600
Aaron O'Toole
00:16:19.160
that's pushing
00:16:19.900
towards liberal light,
00:16:21.440
but the caucus,
00:16:22.540
the Tory MPs
00:16:23.180
that are elected
00:16:23.540
from across the country
00:16:24.740
are still connected
00:16:25.920
to the conservative grassroots
00:16:27.240
and they're not
00:16:28.480
for this kind of policy.
00:16:30.200
But here's the thing,
00:16:31.340
it used to be the case
00:16:32.540
that the party leader
00:16:33.260
would just sort of
00:16:34.000
steamroll any opposition
00:16:35.620
and determine exactly
00:16:36.920
what the party
00:16:37.760
was going to say,
00:16:38.600
but right now,
00:16:39.200
Aaron O'Toole
00:16:39.700
is incredibly weak
00:16:40.780
within the party.
00:16:41.840
As I covered on the show
00:16:43.060
a couple weeks ago,
00:16:44.120
the conservative MPs
00:16:45.360
voted in favor
00:16:46.360
of something called
00:16:46.820
a Reform Act,
00:16:47.760
which allows
00:16:48.620
for a leadership review
00:16:49.980
among a party leader
00:16:51.160
with just a signature
00:16:52.260
of 24 conservative MPs.
00:16:54.360
So all it takes
00:16:54.960
is 24 MPs
00:16:56.220
to say,
00:16:56.620
no,
00:16:56.720
we don't want this guy
00:16:57.560
anymore
00:16:58.300
and it will spur
00:16:59.540
a leadership review
00:17:00.700
which could potentially
00:17:01.940
oust Aaron O'Toole.
00:17:03.120
So right now,
00:17:03.600
he's weak from the election loss
00:17:04.800
and he's worried
00:17:05.600
about this leadership review
00:17:07.140
and so rather than
00:17:08.320
just telling
00:17:08.900
all of the MPs
00:17:10.260
to believe
00:17:11.480
what he believes,
00:17:12.380
it's now basically
00:17:13.180
the exact opposite
00:17:14.180
of that
00:17:14.540
where the MPs
00:17:15.460
get to tell
00:17:16.440
the leader
00:17:16.960
what to do,
00:17:17.520
which is much more democratic
00:17:18.780
and probably much better
00:17:20.500
for the conservative party
00:17:21.880
in my mind,
00:17:22.420
especially with a guy
00:17:23.340
like Aaron O'Toole
00:17:24.180
in charge.
00:17:25.300
So O'Toole
00:17:25.880
allowed the caucus
00:17:27.320
to win the day.
00:17:28.260
He allowed Blake Richards
00:17:29.540
to go out and say
00:17:30.360
that the conservatives
00:17:31.020
do oppose mandatory vaccines
00:17:32.860
but then get this,
00:17:33.900
a mere 24 hours later,
00:17:35.380
Aaron O'Toole himself
00:17:36.320
was a guest on TVO,
00:17:37.840
which is the public
00:17:38.600
television station
00:17:39.540
in Ontario.
00:17:40.460
He was speaking
00:17:41.200
with Steve Pakin,
00:17:42.760
host of The Agenda
00:17:43.580
and O'Toole
00:17:44.620
just basically
00:17:45.380
changed his mind,
00:17:46.480
contradicted caucus,
00:17:47.540
contradicted Blake Richards
00:17:48.600
and he said
00:17:49.560
that the conservatives
00:17:50.740
will respect
00:17:51.480
the Liberal Party's rule,
00:17:53.100
which means
00:17:53.500
that they will conform,
00:17:54.820
which means
00:17:55.180
that they now
00:17:55.700
also believe
00:17:56.480
in forced mandatory
00:17:58.440
vaccines
00:17:59.280
for all members
00:18:00.460
of Parliament.
00:18:01.040
Your position
00:18:01.560
may be very reasonable
00:18:02.380
but the Speaker,
00:18:03.160
the Board of the Eternal
00:18:03.860
Economy of Parliament
00:18:04.700
has still said,
00:18:06.120
tough,
00:18:06.760
the O'Toole formula
00:18:08.500
isn't good enough,
00:18:09.260
we need everybody vaccinated.
00:18:10.620
You can't say
00:18:11.200
everybody in your caucus
00:18:12.120
is vaccinated.
00:18:13.240
We can say
00:18:14.000
that we will follow
00:18:15.040
all public health guidance.
00:18:17.140
So Steve,
00:18:17.700
the BOIE
00:18:18.200
and the Speaker
00:18:18.780
have ruled
00:18:19.640
and we will respect that,
00:18:21.060
of course.
00:18:21.860
We also think,
00:18:22.940
though,
00:18:23.580
that we have to look at
00:18:25.240
not dividing people
00:18:26.640
on this issue.
00:18:27.500
It is difficult
00:18:28.600
to see
00:18:29.360
places where we're
00:18:31.280
seeing people
00:18:31.980
terminated
00:18:33.000
where in some cases
00:18:34.100
I think if we work smart
00:18:35.560
and use all tools
00:18:36.760
we have,
00:18:37.620
we could probably
00:18:38.620
avoid these sort
00:18:39.860
of confrontations
00:18:40.660
with just not
00:18:41.460
politicizing vaccinations.
00:18:43.260
So for 24 hours
00:18:44.740
we had a hint
00:18:45.820
of daylight
00:18:46.320
between the Liberal Party
00:18:47.600
and the Conservative Party.
00:18:48.780
There was a hint
00:18:49.320
of a distinction,
00:18:50.360
a hint of a difference
00:18:51.420
between these two
00:18:52.140
major parties
00:18:52.720
but that apparently
00:18:53.760
was just too much
00:18:54.680
for Aaron O'Toole.
00:18:56.020
Aaron O'Toole
00:18:56.480
prefers to take
00:18:57.620
the Liberal position
00:18:58.320
on every issue.
00:18:59.500
He prefers not to have
00:19:00.480
any kind of media scrutiny.
00:19:01.640
He doesn't want to have
00:19:02.600
those moderately
00:19:03.900
tough questions
00:19:04.640
like we saw
00:19:05.180
the CTV host
00:19:06.040
Evan Solomon
00:19:06.800
asking Blake Richards
00:19:08.500
there.
00:19:09.080
Under Aaron O'Toole's
00:19:10.400
leadership
00:19:10.760
with Aaron O'Toole
00:19:11.580
as leader
00:19:12.040
he would much
00:19:12.880
prefer the parties
00:19:13.720
be so similar
00:19:15.240
that you can't even
00:19:16.020
tell them apart
00:19:16.700
the exact same,
00:19:18.180
the rigid sameness
00:19:19.180
and that is
00:19:19.820
the biggest plague
00:19:20.740
on our political
00:19:21.420
system right now.
00:19:22.880
I'm Candace Malcolm
00:19:23.400
and this is
00:19:24.020
The Candace Malcolm Show.
Link copied!