ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- May 17, 2022
Patrick Brown goes nuclear
Episode Stats
Length
31 minutes
Words per Minute
200.62425
Word Count
6,342
Sentence Count
227
Misogynist Sentences
9
Hate Speech Sentences
7
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
Welcome to Canada's Most Irreverent Talk Show.
00:00:05.340
This is The Andrew Lawton Show, brought to you by True North.
00:00:10.700
Coming up, as the Conservative leadership race wages on,
00:00:14.000
are candidates talking about issues that matter to Conservative Canadians?
00:00:18.000
Certainly not at last week's debate in Edmonton.
00:00:21.140
The Andrew Lawton Show starts right now.
00:00:25.600
Hello and welcome to The Andrew Lawton Show.
00:00:28.600
This is Canada's Most Irreverent Talk Show here on True North,
00:00:32.420
a rare Monday edition of the program on Monday, May 16, 2022.
00:00:37.680
Last week was a little wonky, as I mentioned, and as you may have heard,
00:00:41.260
I was in Edmonton covering the Conservative Party of Canada's leadership debate,
00:00:46.080
the first official debate, official debate, because the party itself put it on
00:00:52.180
and they didn't put on the one at the Canada Strong and Free Conference
00:00:55.300
that Candace Milcom and Jameel Javani moderated.
00:00:59.000
But I must say, if that was official, I far prefer unofficial,
00:01:03.580
because the unofficial debate didn't have questions about what books you're reading,
00:01:07.380
what historical figure you'd like to have dinner with,
00:01:09.880
what Netflix show you liked, or what other streaming program you're binge-watching.
00:01:15.120
And so much so that I'm like,
00:01:16.220
I'm wondering if that's just going to be what electoral platforms are now.
00:01:19.120
You open the page, you open the book, there's like a one-page thing on balance, budgets, taxes,
00:01:24.380
and then the rest of it is just your reviews of all the movies, books, and podcasts,
00:01:29.020
and all of that that you're encountering.
00:01:31.660
Now, to be fair, I don't know if Tom Clark came up with the format,
00:01:36.100
or if the party said,
00:01:37.260
hey Tom, we'd like you to moderate the debate, here's the format,
00:01:40.380
and for whatever reason, he didn't just throw it out and walk out the room right there.
00:01:43.960
I don't know what happened, but I do know that it was a profound humiliation.
00:01:47.580
Questions on complex policies reduced to 15 seconds,
00:01:51.820
a waste of time questions to get to know your candidates
00:01:55.120
that don't actually tell you anything of substance about them.
00:01:58.740
And by the end of it, you have these paddles that you have to put up.
00:02:02.100
I don't know if you saw this,
00:02:03.100
but the candidates have to put up their paddles if they want to respond to something.
00:02:07.020
And if they run out of paddling,
00:02:08.920
then even if a candidate directly attacks them,
00:02:11.580
they don't get to respond because,
00:02:12.920
oh, well, you've used up your four paddles.
00:02:14.660
Watching it was just absolutely absurd.
00:02:19.060
So I was looking forward to the scrums afterwards,
00:02:21.660
because at the scrums, at least there was an opportunity
00:02:23.800
for candidates to give a direct response to a direct question
00:02:27.140
that wasn't about what they're watching on TV.
00:02:30.800
I know I keep going back to that,
00:02:32.380
but let's be real here.
00:02:33.520
This is not a debate.
00:02:34.960
And this is, as I've always said,
00:02:36.360
not what Conservative Party of Canada members
00:02:38.660
care about when they're deciding who to vote for
00:02:41.460
to be their leader and eventually to become,
00:02:44.200
they hope, the next Prime Minister.
00:02:46.100
So I am going to be talking a lot about
00:02:48.940
what's been happening in the Conservative leadership race
00:02:51.680
the last couple of weeks.
00:02:53.160
You may remember I was at the Canada Strong and Free Conference
00:02:56.100
a couple of weeks back and did some interviews there,
00:02:58.600
including one with Conservative leadership candidate Scott Aitchison
00:03:01.520
that I'll share later on in the program.
00:03:04.120
But I first want to talk about some of the themes
00:03:06.240
that emerged from the debate in Edmonton
00:03:08.460
that I thought were quite interesting.
00:03:11.420
And one of them was Leslyn Lewis.
00:03:13.940
Now, Leslyn Lewis is quite an interesting one
00:03:16.640
because I think on paper she does what a lot of people
00:03:18.820
in our audience want her to do.
00:03:20.320
She takes aim at global institutions
00:03:22.440
that she feels Canada is giving up its sovereignty to.
00:03:25.760
She is unafraid to talk about social issues.
00:03:29.100
She's been very poised and polished in a lot of things she's done.
00:03:32.340
I didn't feel the debate performance was her strongest.
00:03:35.740
And I don't know what it was.
00:03:37.740
Maybe she was nervous.
00:03:38.920
Maybe she just felt underprepared.
00:03:40.560
Maybe the campaign's just not going as well for her.
00:03:43.280
So it's just a bit of a different space that she has to occupy.
00:03:46.020
But I was looking and I just wasn't getting the clarity and fire
00:03:49.500
that you get from her tweets
00:03:51.300
and you get from some interviews with her.
00:03:53.580
And even afterwards, I asked a couple of questions of her
00:03:56.480
that I thought certainly the first one would be a slam dunk.
00:04:00.880
I thought this was an easy one that she could come out.
00:04:03.100
I wasn't trying to give her a softball,
00:04:04.720
but I thought it was one that was in her wheelhouse
00:04:06.640
so she'd be able to give a really clear, concise, and direct answer.
00:04:10.700
And I'm not sure she did.
00:04:12.540
Good evening, Andrew Lawton, True North.
00:04:14.380
Earlier today, the Correctional Service of Canada
00:04:16.740
confirmed its policy that biologically male inmates
00:04:21.420
can be reassigned to women's prisons based on preference alone.
00:04:26.100
I was wondering what you think about that policy
00:04:27.480
and if you would reverse that as Prime Minister.
00:04:30.780
Well, I think it's very important that people,
00:04:33.980
whatever their gender,
00:04:36.040
has a certain level of comfort in certain situations.
00:04:42.100
I also think that there are situations
00:04:43.900
where biological females may feel a sense of vulnerability
00:04:51.300
because of the situations that they may have been in,
00:04:56.680
for example, if they were sexually assaulted by a male, etc.
00:05:01.220
And so we have to make sure that we find compassionate ways
00:05:05.320
to accommodate the diversity of individuals
00:05:11.280
that will find themselves in a facility,
00:05:16.440
whether it is a shelter or whether it is a correctional facility.
00:05:21.300
So in fairness to Leslyn Lewis,
00:05:23.500
she is saying there that, yeah,
00:05:24.780
there are some areas where women are going to be,
00:05:27.220
because of their own experiences and identity, more vulnerable.
00:05:29.940
We need to be respectful and that.
00:05:31.720
But ultimately, it wasn't just a direct answer
00:05:34.900
to the question in the sense of what I think other people,
00:05:38.940
what I think ordinary people care about.
00:05:40.800
I mean, I just wrote a column about this
00:05:42.180
that's going to be coming out in the interim next month
00:05:44.400
in which I said, you know, the reality of this issue
00:05:47.400
is that it's like the Emperor's New Clothes
00:05:49.620
in that most people view it the same way
00:05:53.140
but are just so afraid of saying it.
00:05:55.400
And in the end, it sort of makes it look like
00:05:57.460
this is more controversial and more contentious
00:06:00.080
than it actually is, same as trans athletes in sports.
00:06:02.620
But in this case, we're talking about something
00:06:04.280
that's directly under the government's control,
00:06:06.080
which is transgender identification in prisons
00:06:09.740
and being able to just on a whim say,
00:06:11.720
oh, you know, I'd actually like to be in a women's prison today.
00:06:14.440
And I mean, again, if you read the policy,
00:06:16.700
there's no saying they couldn't just switch back and forth
00:06:19.580
on a day-by-day basis.
00:06:20.760
Say, oh, you know, I hear they're serving lasagna
00:06:23.040
in the men's prison.
00:06:23.900
I'm a man today.
00:06:25.120
And then, oh, you know, I don't actually know women.
00:06:28.460
I want to be in the women's side today.
00:06:30.020
Who knows what's going on there?
00:06:31.640
So that's going to be something here.
00:06:33.880
But again, it's possible to talk about these things
00:06:36.820
that matter and should matter.
00:06:39.220
And we should be embracing debates that have these things.
00:06:42.620
We should be embracing debates that talk about the issues
00:06:45.180
that matter to Conservatives.
00:06:46.520
And Candace and Jameel did a great job of this.
00:06:48.680
I don't think Tom Clark did.
00:06:50.420
Now, how much control he had over the questions,
00:06:52.220
I don't know.
00:06:53.320
But if I were looking at that as a member
00:06:55.020
of the Conservative Party of Canada,
00:06:56.560
wanting to know which leadership candidate to vote for,
00:06:59.840
I would be coming out of this saying, like, okay,
00:07:03.800
well, Patrick Brown likes the show Ozark
00:07:06.120
and Pierre Pauliev is reading Jordan Peterson's book
00:07:09.320
and Leslie Lewis wants to have dinner
00:07:11.140
with William Wilberforce.
00:07:12.620
Um, okay, so my taxes are going to go up, down.
00:07:18.280
CBC is getting funded, defunded.
00:07:20.500
My firearms license is like, you get nothing from that.
00:07:24.680
And then you take the opportunity,
00:07:27.100
the opportunity that these candidates have
00:07:29.200
to talk about Conservative issues
00:07:30.600
when once they are the leader,
00:07:33.180
the mainstream media will give them no such opportunity.
00:07:35.600
So if you don't allow them and force them
00:07:37.620
to talk about things that matter to Conservatives now,
00:07:39.720
you're never going to hear them talk about these things.
00:07:42.500
And I will say Roman Babber did a tremendous job.
00:07:45.460
He was very polished.
00:07:46.740
He had answers.
00:07:47.760
And when I asked him a question in the scrum after,
00:07:50.280
he seemed to genuinely approach it
00:07:52.260
with a level of thoughtfulness.
00:07:53.960
Now, he was couching.
00:07:55.080
He was couching what he was saying in a little bit.
00:07:57.120
But I don't know if that was genuinely
00:07:58.760
because he didn't want to commit to something on the fly
00:08:01.400
that he wasn't sure if he would be able to follow through on.
00:08:04.460
Take a look at that exchange.
00:08:06.460
Good evening, Andrew Lawton, True North.
00:08:08.180
You've been unequivocally against vaccine mandates.
00:08:10.960
That obviously includes mandates for public sector workers.
00:08:13.820
If you were Prime Minister,
00:08:14.980
would you rehire anyone who was fired
00:08:17.880
because of vaccine mandates?
00:08:19.300
And if so, would you give them retroactive pay
00:08:21.420
for a time they missed?
00:08:23.280
So 100% I would mandate.
00:08:25.360
I try to pass similar legislation in Ontario,
00:08:27.400
the Jobs and Jobs Act,
00:08:28.840
that would retroactively protect workers.
00:08:31.420
We have to think about how we're going to go about that.
00:08:33.760
We certainly want to try and put them
00:08:35.220
in the position that they would have otherwise been.
00:08:37.680
I'm not sure if we're going to do that through EI.
00:08:39.460
I'm also not sure how we're going to go about that
00:08:41.420
when it comes to those that are not unionized.
00:08:43.920
Those that are unionized should be a lot easier.
00:08:46.120
Those that are not unionized,
00:08:47.580
going to have to give that some thought.
00:08:48.920
But I think that it's inhumane to make someone choose
00:08:51.460
between their ability to put food on the table
00:08:53.200
and their personal health care choice.
00:08:55.060
We've got to do right by all Canadians.
00:08:57.400
Now that's an important issue
00:08:58.420
and one that I haven't heard
00:08:59.680
a lot of candidates talking about,
00:09:01.620
which is why I, I mean, I'm being a bit gratuitous here,
00:09:03.820
but why I asked it, okay, you're against mandates.
00:09:05.960
You think these people should be back to work.
00:09:07.580
Do you think they should be made whole
00:09:09.100
for what they lost solely because of the mandates?
00:09:12.420
And there's no right answer or wrong answer.
00:09:14.560
It would just be nice to know
00:09:15.600
what candidates are prepared to do.
00:09:17.580
And if they're prepared to really try to rectify
00:09:20.760
this profound injustice
00:09:21.960
that has been the vaccine mandates
00:09:24.200
on the public sector workforce
00:09:25.600
and on Canadians as a whole, again,
00:09:27.560
who still can't take up jobs in a lot of sectors,
00:09:30.280
who can't board planes, trains, and so on and so forth.
00:09:33.880
So these are, again, some of the issues.
00:09:35.820
And I'm not claiming to have the monopoly
00:09:37.640
on what matters to conservatives.
00:09:39.220
I'm just talking about the fact that
00:09:40.760
these are the substantive policy issues
00:09:42.880
that desperately need to be injected
00:09:44.560
into a leadership race
00:09:46.400
and aren't under the debate
00:09:48.520
that the party officially put forward.
00:09:50.040
I know they have another French debate coming up
00:09:51.820
on the 25th, but this is one of the reasons
00:09:54.300
the Independent Press Gallery
00:09:55.520
has put together its debate for May 30th,
00:09:58.520
which I have the privilege of moderating
00:10:00.080
because we need to start showcasing
00:10:02.000
some of these concerns
00:10:03.040
that people are actually talking about.
00:10:05.000
The people in our audience are messaging me saying,
00:10:06.980
hey, what do you think about this?
00:10:08.280
What do you think about that?
00:10:09.920
And that's the goal here,
00:10:10.960
to start talking about these things
00:10:12.300
so that we can hold the eventual leader accountable.
00:10:16.140
One of the big things,
00:10:17.200
if I go back in time a bit,
00:10:18.700
one of the big things that I think
00:10:19.940
worked against Aaron O'Toole
00:10:21.100
in his leadership of the Conservative Party,
00:10:24.100
especially during and after the election,
00:10:26.160
was that he had put on the record
00:10:27.900
some very decisive policies
00:10:29.700
during the leadership race,
00:10:31.360
these red meat, true blue Conservative policies
00:10:33.620
that he was not prepared to live up on
00:10:36.140
in the general,
00:10:37.260
like defunding CBC,
00:10:38.780
like firearms rights,
00:10:40.040
like conscience rights.
00:10:41.440
So because he was forced to be on record
00:10:44.520
in the leadership race,
00:10:45.940
there was a record to hold him to account to
00:10:48.820
when he was the leader.
00:10:51.280
I don't even know if we got that
00:10:52.920
out of the debate last week.
00:10:54.960
And again, when I talk about clarity of answer,
00:10:57.300
I have to give credit to Jean Charest here
00:10:59.060
because this is a guy who clearly
00:11:00.460
is not the favourite in the room.
00:11:03.060
And I've never seen a room of Conservatives
00:11:05.080
in which he was the favourite
00:11:06.160
in the race so far.
00:11:07.780
If I look at in Ottawa
00:11:09.060
and I look at in Edmonton,
00:11:11.020
where he was the only candidate,
00:11:12.400
so far as I saw,
00:11:13.280
who got booed for something he said.
00:11:15.000
And it was the same issue both times.
00:11:17.620
Opposition to the Freedom Convoy
00:11:19.360
and specifically trying to criticise
00:11:22.080
Pierre Pollyevre for supporting the convoy.
00:11:25.300
And whatever you think of Jean Charest's position,
00:11:28.100
I have to say here,
00:11:29.100
for him to own that,
00:11:30.760
for him to come out and say,
00:11:32.520
this is what I think,
00:11:33.520
this is what I believe,
00:11:34.560
I don't care what any of you in the room believe,
00:11:36.340
I'm sticking to my guns here,
00:11:37.980
I have to give him respect for that.
00:11:40.500
And it was interesting
00:11:41.640
because one thing that I thought of in that,
00:11:43.160
well, if you think it's so bad
00:11:46.420
for someone to support the convoy,
00:11:48.320
if you think it's such a disqualifying thing,
00:11:51.600
could you even vote for a candidate?
00:11:53.600
Could you vote for this Conservative Party
00:11:55.700
that you say is your home party?
00:11:57.020
Could you vote for the Conservatives
00:11:58.260
if it meant casting a ballot
00:12:00.060
for someone who was supportive of the convoy?
00:12:02.640
This was the question I asked.
00:12:04.300
Good evening, Andrew Lawton, True North.
00:12:06.200
You've said that the convoy is an illegal blockade.
00:12:09.300
Obviously, you've been very open about your position
00:12:12.420
and you've distanced yourself from other candidates.
00:12:15.620
Could you in good conscience vote for a candidate
00:12:18.100
in your local riding that supported the convoy,
00:12:20.540
given the comments you've made
00:12:21.580
about how Mr. Polyev's support for the Freedom Convoy
00:12:24.400
is, in your words, disqualifying?
00:12:26.640
And Andrew, I'm glad you asked the question
00:12:28.880
because this whole story has parts to it.
00:12:32.800
First part is,
00:12:33.940
people do have a right to protest.
00:12:35.460
There should be no doubt in anyone's mind about that.
00:12:39.360
Peaceful protest is part of democracy.
00:12:42.080
And if someone knows about that
00:12:43.660
because I've been on the other side of it in my lifetime,
00:12:46.180
it's me.
00:12:47.060
And I've never, ever questioned that.
00:12:49.060
So that's the first part.
00:12:50.440
Second part,
00:12:51.500
you know, the whole mess was very much on Mr. Trudeau.
00:12:55.720
I mean, how come this happened?
00:12:57.500
I mean, and by the way,
00:12:58.360
when you return to that whole story,
00:13:00.260
it's just, I mean, it was incredible.
00:13:01.820
How could the situation degenerate the way it did?
00:13:06.600
Now, that being said,
00:13:08.180
that is not an excuse for those who go out there
00:13:10.500
and support an illegal blockade.
00:13:14.300
And when I'm saying that,
00:13:15.460
I'm not trying to,
00:13:16.600
I am not at all criticizing truckers
00:13:19.660
and people who have their legitimate jobs
00:13:21.500
to who we owe a lot
00:13:22.500
because during this whole COVID period,
00:13:24.840
they stepped up and they did their job.
00:13:27.200
And they deserve nothing less
00:13:28.760
than our very deep respect and gratitude.
00:13:32.100
But illegal blockades at borders
00:13:34.560
or anywhere else,
00:13:36.360
especially borders,
00:13:37.380
we lost hundreds of millions of dollars.
00:13:39.840
Folks in the automotive industry
00:13:41.220
questioned whether they should be investing in Canada.
00:13:43.780
The American president
00:13:44.740
would have to call up Mr. Trudeau
00:13:46.100
to ask him whether he needed an American intervention
00:13:48.120
to clean up a blockade in Canada.
00:13:50.080
That's embarrassing for us.
00:13:52.660
My point is simple.
00:13:53.940
If you have the privilege
00:13:55.660
of being a member of parliament,
00:13:57.880
you make laws, you change laws,
00:13:59.400
you can't treat the laws of the land
00:14:01.400
like a buffet table
00:14:02.420
from which you choose what's popular.
00:14:04.880
What's popular or non-popular.
00:14:06.780
And sometimes you have to resist
00:14:08.800
that's leadership,
00:14:09.740
what may be popular in the instant
00:14:11.340
for what is a more fundamental principle.
00:14:14.060
So I'm sorry if I went on longer
00:14:15.440
than I usually do,
00:14:16.360
and I certainly did in this debate,
00:14:17.700
but I was allowed time to do that.
00:14:20.420
Thank you, Andrew.
00:14:21.340
Could you yes or no vote for someone?
00:14:23.820
What, the blockade?
00:14:25.360
Well, it's a hypothetical question.
00:14:27.160
I mean, we'll get to,
00:14:29.080
after I become leader,
00:14:30.200
there'll be plenty of time to debate these things.
00:14:32.420
Thank you, Andrew.
00:14:33.440
It was kind of faint there
00:14:34.640
because I didn't have,
00:14:35.400
they took away my microphone,
00:14:36.600
but the point of the ask
00:14:37.380
is I was saying yes or no,
00:14:38.360
could you vote for someone?
00:14:39.280
And then that was when he said
00:14:40.560
he wouldn't engage in a hypothetical.
00:14:42.240
But again, answers it very clearly,
00:14:44.300
very directly,
00:14:44.860
says what he believes.
00:14:46.760
And it's up to the members
00:14:47.820
to then decide whether they agree
00:14:49.600
with those beliefs
00:14:50.300
or want to reward these beliefs.
00:14:52.460
But that's the importance of this process.
00:14:55.400
And I know I talked about it last week,
00:14:56.880
but it is interesting
00:14:57.740
how convoy support,
00:14:59.560
who supported the convoy first,
00:15:01.100
who supported it better,
00:15:02.040
has become such a litmus test in this race.
00:15:04.860
Oftentimes, Roman and Leslin and Pierre
00:15:07.080
are all talking about their support
00:15:08.900
and opposition of mandates,
00:15:10.320
the truckers and all of that.
00:15:11.700
And this has become so critical.
00:15:13.440
Now, Patrick Brown's campaign
00:15:14.940
sent out an email this morning,
00:15:18.080
which I have to share.
00:15:19.220
I won't read the whole thing.
00:15:20.460
And incidentally, I should say,
00:15:22.300
it's not even clear when you're reading it
00:15:24.260
that it is from Patrick Brown's campaign.
00:15:26.720
It doesn't mention anywhere in it
00:15:28.420
Patrick Brown's name.
00:15:29.900
It's from a woman who identifies herself
00:15:31.800
as Dionne Duncan,
00:15:34.020
who identifies as a Conservative Party member
00:15:37.040
and a minority woman
00:15:38.100
in the greater Toronto area.
00:15:40.080
And she says,
00:15:40.760
over the weekend,
00:15:41.660
10 people were murdered
00:15:42.740
in a hate-motivated terrorist attack
00:15:44.500
in Buffalo, New York.
00:15:45.800
The murderer was motivated
00:15:47.200
by white replacement theory,
00:15:49.800
a racist white nationalist conspiracy theory.
00:15:52.580
You might want to think
00:15:53.520
that type of thinking
00:15:54.260
doesn't exist here in Canada,
00:15:55.440
but if you think that,
00:15:56.340
you are wrong.
00:15:57.600
Yesterday,
00:15:58.620
after the Buffalo Shooters manifesto
00:16:00.800
was reported,
00:16:01.540
a video of convoy leader,
00:16:03.100
Pat King,
00:16:03.820
spreading and justifying
00:16:04.940
this vile,
00:16:06.020
hateful conspiracy theory
00:16:07.100
went viral.
00:16:07.700
I need you to feel
00:16:08.980
what I felt when I saw this,
00:16:10.820
fear.
00:16:12.140
She goes on about hate in Canada
00:16:13.920
and how it has no place
00:16:15.060
and then says this,
00:16:17.240
Pierre Polyev was asked
00:16:18.800
to condemn
00:16:19.680
so-called white replacement theory
00:16:21.960
and anyone who believes it.
00:16:23.660
It should have been easy for Pierre.
00:16:25.140
A simple tweet would have worked,
00:16:26.560
but he hasn't done it.
00:16:28.280
A candidate who claims
00:16:29.320
he wants to be Prime Minister of Canada
00:16:30.880
will not condemn hate.
00:16:33.020
She says we need to refuse
00:16:34.300
those who play footsie with hate.
00:16:35.960
She says that Pierre's silence
00:16:37.820
is deafening.
00:16:39.040
She says he won't vote
00:16:40.040
to recognize Islamophobia.
00:16:41.900
He won't condemn Pat King.
00:16:43.860
And she says,
00:16:44.640
what does it say about Pierre
00:16:46.020
that he wants to win your vote
00:16:48.260
by making life less safe
00:16:50.060
and less equal
00:16:50.960
for minority women?
00:16:52.980
She says for me.
00:16:54.820
And they're basically saying,
00:16:57.180
the campaign,
00:16:57.900
the Patrick Brown campaign,
00:16:58.900
saying in this email,
00:16:59.680
and you can read the whole thing,
00:17:00.920
that they are putting
00:17:03.020
at Pierre Polyev's feet,
00:17:05.540
Pat King,
00:17:06.300
racism,
00:17:06.980
hatred,
00:17:07.480
white supremacy,
00:17:08.280
the Buffalo shooting.
00:17:09.640
They're saying that he's
00:17:10.620
a white supremacist hate figure
00:17:12.200
or he's playing footsie
00:17:14.200
with white supremacists
00:17:15.660
because he didn't tweet
00:17:16.880
in response to Patrick Brown
00:17:18.820
a condemnation of this attack.
00:17:21.200
Now,
00:17:21.420
I haven't followed this.
00:17:22.760
I don't believe for a second
00:17:24.240
that Pierre Polyev is pro-attack,
00:17:27.860
that he's in support
00:17:29.060
of what happened in Buffalo.
00:17:30.260
What I believe is that
00:17:31.700
when he's asked to condemn
00:17:33.640
by Patrick Brown,
00:17:35.220
it's because Patrick Brown
00:17:36.320
is trying to suck him
00:17:37.040
into this whatever,
00:17:38.640
this pissing match on Twitter,
00:17:40.060
which obviously he's not
00:17:41.260
going to get in on
00:17:41.880
with Patrick Brown.
00:17:42.920
But the whole thing
00:17:43.760
is ridiculous.
00:17:45.080
And for all that Jean Charest
00:17:46.320
and that side
00:17:47.700
that tends to be
00:17:48.340
against Pierre Polyev
00:17:49.320
is saying that,
00:17:50.600
oh, well,
00:17:51.580
Pierre's tone is unbecoming
00:17:52.860
of the Conservative Party.
00:17:54.420
Well,
00:17:54.540
now you have literally
00:17:55.840
Pierre being dragged
00:17:57.660
into this
00:17:58.300
and being maligned
00:17:59.300
as a white supremacist sympathizer
00:18:01.460
or as someone
00:18:02.700
who's at least adjacent
00:18:04.180
to white supremacy.
00:18:05.300
And no one's concerned
00:18:06.380
about that tone,
00:18:07.480
about how the Conservative Party,
00:18:09.020
whatever happens
00:18:09.960
in this leadership race,
00:18:11.100
moves beyond that.
00:18:12.800
Seriously.
00:18:14.300
She says he's silent on hate
00:18:16.080
and the election
00:18:16.720
will already be lost
00:18:17.820
and it probably should be.
00:18:19.080
So they're saying
00:18:19.980
if Pierre wins,
00:18:20.920
the Conservative Party
00:18:21.820
is a hateful white supremacist racket
00:18:24.480
that doesn't deserve to exist.
00:18:26.340
Doesn't deserve to win.
00:18:28.100
Okay.
00:18:29.080
That is what we call
00:18:30.000
going nuclear.
00:18:31.120
That is going scorched earth on it.
00:18:33.060
And again,
00:18:33.560
Patrick Brown,
00:18:34.200
not the front runner
00:18:34.960
in the race.
00:18:35.800
Pierre Polyev is among them.
00:18:37.900
Pierre and Jean Charest as well.
00:18:40.000
So if this is what he thinks
00:18:41.740
is going to be the strategy
00:18:42.660
to get him across the finish line,
00:18:44.060
then go for it.
00:18:45.300
But this is absolutely not
00:18:47.220
an issue
00:18:48.780
that is going to resonate
00:18:50.760
with people,
00:18:51.320
I don't think.
00:18:53.020
And it's playing the left's game.
00:18:55.820
And I don't have a dog
00:18:57.020
in this fight, by the way.
00:18:57.800
I'm not supporting
00:18:58.440
any leadership candidate.
00:18:59.980
I've extended invitations
00:19:01.020
to them all.
00:19:02.000
I will criticize them
00:19:02.940
and support them
00:19:03.520
as I've been doing
00:19:04.220
even in this show
00:19:05.000
based on the merits
00:19:06.300
of what they say
00:19:07.100
and how they say it.
00:19:09.540
I've been critical
00:19:10.320
to Patrick Brown
00:19:11.020
for not coming on this show,
00:19:12.280
for not attending
00:19:12.900
the Canada Strong
00:19:14.040
and Free debate.
00:19:15.080
I've had a lot of
00:19:16.020
kind things to say
00:19:16.880
about Jean Charest
00:19:17.560
who I disagree with on a lot
00:19:18.900
and Scott Aitchison
00:19:19.920
because of how forthright
00:19:21.060
they are.
00:19:21.540
So when Patrick Brown
00:19:24.080
comes out with this
00:19:24.820
and I look at this
00:19:25.440
and I'm saying
00:19:25.800
you're just playing
00:19:26.460
the left's game.
00:19:27.120
You're doing the left's work
00:19:28.020
for them.
00:19:29.080
Because now
00:19:29.740
when the election
00:19:30.700
comes around
00:19:31.240
if Pierre Polyev
00:19:32.060
is the leader
00:19:32.540
CBC will say
00:19:33.380
even Patrick Brown
00:19:35.100
said no one
00:19:35.920
should vote conservative
00:19:36.760
because well
00:19:37.740
if Pierre wins
00:19:38.400
they're just a racist
00:19:39.480
white supremacist party.
00:19:41.280
They're doing
00:19:42.160
the left's work
00:19:43.420
for them
00:19:44.040
and they don't even
00:19:44.840
seem to care.
00:19:45.980
Just before we go here
00:19:47.160
I had the chance
00:19:47.900
to at the Canada
00:19:48.940
Strong and Free
00:19:49.560
Networking Conference
00:19:50.460
sit down with
00:19:51.580
Scott Aitchison.
00:19:52.620
This was the day
00:19:53.540
after the debate.
00:19:54.880
It was great.
00:19:55.340
I got to see
00:19:56.060
Lesley Lewis
00:19:56.920
and Roman Babber
00:19:57.640
as I shared my chats
00:19:58.580
with them in the
00:19:59.000
previous show
00:19:59.520
and also Scott.
00:20:01.000
Now Scott I should say
00:20:01.960
not a front runner
00:20:03.340
in terms of name
00:20:04.140
recognition
00:20:04.600
but has run a really
00:20:06.160
policy heavy campaign
00:20:07.880
that's touching on
00:20:09.200
a lot of things
00:20:09.820
like ending supply
00:20:10.900
management
00:20:11.320
which I just so
00:20:12.220
desperately wish
00:20:13.040
other people would
00:20:13.740
take up.
00:20:14.560
I know it's like
00:20:14.940
a strange hill to die on
00:20:16.040
but believe me
00:20:16.600
it's important.
00:20:17.540
All of these free market
00:20:18.520
people that were just
00:20:19.460
twisting themselves
00:20:20.280
into pretzels
00:20:21.000
in Edmonton
00:20:21.980
to say well
00:20:22.820
maybe we don't need
00:20:23.820
a free market
00:20:24.300
when we're talking
00:20:24.780
about dairy and poultry
00:20:25.720
but everything else
00:20:26.620
free market
00:20:27.200
but also on foreign
00:20:28.860
policy which we touched
00:20:29.860
on a little bit
00:20:30.480
in this chat.
00:20:31.260
So this is my interview
00:20:32.380
recorded in Ottawa
00:20:33.740
with Scott Aitchison.
00:20:35.540
Joining me now is
00:20:36.480
Conservative leadership
00:20:37.400
candidate Scott Aitchison.
00:20:38.800
Scott good to talk
00:20:39.460
to you again
00:20:39.760
in person this time.
00:20:41.080
Great to be here
00:20:41.640
yeah thank you.
00:20:42.620
So let's start
00:20:43.440
with the debate
00:20:43.820
last night.
00:20:44.400
This was the first
00:20:45.100
official opportunity
00:20:46.260
that all of the
00:20:46.980
well almost all
00:20:47.740
of the candidates
00:20:48.360
were on stage
00:20:50.020
together in this
00:20:50.800
leadership race.
00:20:51.720
I know there's a lot
00:20:52.240
of prep that goes
00:20:52.860
into it but looking
00:20:54.060
back now with a day's
00:20:55.400
hindsight what was
00:20:56.100
your feeling about it?
00:20:57.880
Well I spoke about
00:20:59.200
last night actually
00:21:00.000
that there's a lot
00:21:00.480
of division and a lot
00:21:01.280
of rancor and sort
00:21:02.440
of you know visceral
00:21:04.320
partisan rhetoric
00:21:05.300
back and forth
00:21:06.040
and the tax and I
00:21:07.120
think that that's
00:21:07.800
actually bad for our
00:21:08.760
party.
00:21:09.180
It's bad for our
00:21:09.960
politics and I tried
00:21:11.700
to lead by example
00:21:12.920
by being respectful
00:21:13.940
and I think we need
00:21:15.500
to talk about ideas
00:21:16.220
and not each other.
00:21:17.480
Now I mean your
00:21:18.120
approach and we heard
00:21:19.440
this in your opening
00:21:20.040
statement was and I'm
00:21:21.500
crudely paraphrasing it
00:21:22.780
but it was can't we
00:21:23.420
all get along.
00:21:24.120
I mean you were really
00:21:24.640
pitching unity and is
00:21:26.480
that enough of a
00:21:27.280
message?
00:21:28.960
Well not certainly
00:21:30.020
not for the whole race
00:21:30.880
I mean I'm obviously
00:21:32.020
talking about policy
00:21:33.220
ideas as well.
00:21:34.480
Last night of course
00:21:35.260
we were responding to
00:21:36.180
questions but the
00:21:36.860
questions you know
00:21:38.360
seem to lead to every
00:21:39.760
other candidate talking
00:21:40.880
about each other which
00:21:42.420
was my point that you
00:21:43.580
know we got to stop
00:21:44.540
attacking each other
00:21:45.340
start talking about
00:21:46.180
ideas and you know
00:21:47.780
present those to
00:21:48.560
Canadians in a way
00:21:49.300
that they can trust us
00:21:50.760
to lead and govern.
00:21:51.940
I know historically in
00:21:52.860
leadership races or at
00:21:53.900
the local level
00:21:54.460
nomination races you
00:21:55.680
you get these sometimes
00:21:57.060
bare knuckle brawls but
00:21:58.240
they're always done
00:21:58.820
respectfully and at the
00:21:59.640
end of it everyone
00:22:00.220
shakes hands and work
00:22:01.360
together.
00:22:02.480
Is your concern that
00:22:03.820
that can't happen or
00:22:05.000
won't happen after this
00:22:06.020
race?
00:22:06.460
No it can happen but we
00:22:08.500
have to choose to make
00:22:09.260
it happen.
00:22:10.200
I used to say this all
00:22:10.900
the time when I was
00:22:11.560
mayor of Huntsville.
00:22:12.260
I led a council that
00:22:13.500
was engaged and you
00:22:14.600
know we would have
00:22:15.220
some knock down drag
00:22:16.660
them out battles over
00:22:17.560
issues and in the
00:22:18.640
council chamber but we
00:22:19.600
always would leave and
00:22:21.680
and we'd be friends.
00:22:23.020
I would argue you know
00:22:23.600
you can disagree without
00:22:24.580
being disagreeable but
00:22:25.960
often go for a pint
00:22:26.780
after the council
00:22:27.500
meeting just to say you
00:22:28.460
know what we can be on
00:22:29.920
different sides of an
00:22:30.540
issue but at the end of
00:22:31.260
the day we're all here
00:22:32.060
to move Huntsville
00:22:33.020
forward and that's the
00:22:34.320
same thing here we are
00:22:35.920
all here every single
00:22:37.300
candidate up there last
00:22:38.320
night you know they're
00:22:39.860
not taking time away from
00:22:41.060
their families and their
00:22:41.980
lives to do this for the
00:22:43.840
you know just the good
00:22:44.720
of their health or for
00:22:45.500
their entertainment value
00:22:46.260
they're here because they
00:22:47.060
really truly believe what
00:22:48.020
they're doing they want to
00:22:48.680
make our party better they
00:22:49.520
want to make our country
00:22:50.220
better so we need to stop
00:22:52.440
attacking each other and
00:22:54.060
focus on ideas and that
00:22:56.300
moves our party forward
00:22:57.200
it actually helps us expand
00:22:59.040
the tent and it helps us
00:23:00.480
build trust with you know
00:23:01.780
Canadians in those places
00:23:02.840
where we haven't been
00:23:03.920
winning and we need to
00:23:04.980
win.
00:23:05.660
What are the ideas that you
00:23:06.940
feel need to be front and
00:23:08.400
center in the race that
00:23:09.180
aren't?
00:23:10.300
Well I think we need to be
00:23:11.220
talking a little bit more
00:23:11.900
about our foreign policy
00:23:13.000
under the last seven years
00:23:15.120
of the Trudeau government I
00:23:16.300
think Canada we're a bit of
00:23:17.840
an embarrassment on the
00:23:18.520
world stage we're not a
00:23:20.120
reliable partner and we
00:23:21.560
need to be spending two
00:23:22.280
percent of our GDP on on our
00:23:24.620
defense system I mean NATO
00:23:26.100
we haven't lived up to our
00:23:27.460
commitments in NATO almost
00:23:29.460
since the inception of the
00:23:30.260
organization and our allies
00:23:32.300
are forming new
00:23:32.960
partnerships and new
00:23:34.020
alliances without us because
00:23:35.400
we're just not showing up
00:23:36.840
and so we obviously need to
00:23:39.060
spend more on defense and
00:23:40.500
we need to have a more
00:23:41.080
principled stand on you
00:23:43.060
know issues like Huawei for
00:23:44.800
example we need to ban
00:23:46.260
Huawei we've got to stop
00:23:47.560
dithering on these things
00:23:48.540
we need you know we've got
00:23:49.440
to stand up to you know
00:23:51.400
countries like China and
00:23:53.360
their communist regime and
00:23:54.720
their bullying and it's a
00:23:56.360
security threat we've got to
00:23:57.200
stop dithering on these
00:23:58.020
issues we've got to and so
00:23:59.300
these are issues that I
00:24:00.260
think conservatives can lead
00:24:02.940
on and should be leading
00:24:03.820
on we should be talking
00:24:04.960
about them Canadians want to
00:24:06.080
hear about these issues but
00:24:07.280
when we're just busy
00:24:08.220
attacking each other we're
00:24:09.580
not talking about those
00:24:10.140
ideas and those are the
00:24:10.800
things we need to be
00:24:11.220
discussing so just on the
00:24:12.400
on the defense funding
00:24:13.940
there and NATO spending do
00:24:15.900
I take from that that an
00:24:16.760
NHSN budget brings defense
00:24:18.020
up to two percent of
00:24:18.860
Canada's GDP absolutely
00:24:20.220
and when you talk about
00:24:21.500
Canadian leadership I mean
00:24:22.740
Canada failed to secure a
00:24:24.480
seat on the United Nations
00:24:25.300
Security Council after
00:24:26.980
relentless lobbying and
00:24:28.620
campaigning by the Prime
00:24:29.960
Minister on that I know
00:24:31.400
there was a story in
00:24:32.380
Bloomberg some time ago
00:24:33.380
about how the Prime Minister
00:24:34.400
was trying to be the one
00:24:35.900
to broker the EU Northern
00:24:37.700
Ireland deal and again no
00:24:39.520
one was taking the call no
00:24:40.660
one wanted Canada to play a
00:24:41.720
role the Foreign Minister
00:24:43.220
Melanie Jolie has talked
00:24:44.260
about how our place is
00:24:45.140
convening but no one seems
00:24:46.540
to want to sit at the table
00:24:47.440
so how do you restore
00:24:49.420
Canada's legitimacy on the
00:24:50.700
foreign stage when people
00:24:52.320
have tried it I mean that
00:24:53.020
was Justin Trudeau's big
00:24:53.960
pitch Canada's back how do
00:24:55.280
you do that though yeah but
00:24:56.720
Justin didn't really try it
00:24:59.260
at all he thought he could
00:25:00.360
just charm the world with his
00:25:01.640
name and what you know and
00:25:03.320
that would somehow do
00:25:04.160
something we have to be a
00:25:05.720
reliable partner I mean we
00:25:07.660
need to live up to our
00:25:08.660
commitments in NATO we need
00:25:09.680
to live up to our
00:25:10.240
commitments in on foreign
00:25:11.540
aid these are these are you
00:25:13.300
know countries that are
00:25:14.420
going to rely on Canada and
00:25:15.420
if they can't rely on
00:25:16.280
Canada no matter how much
00:25:18.980
charm offensive Justin
00:25:20.300
Trudeau does around the
00:25:21.060
world they're not going to
00:25:21.600
care and so principled
00:25:23.880
leadership and building the
00:25:25.420
relationships that we need
00:25:26.520
to build around the world
00:25:27.500
Prime Minister Mulroney was a
00:25:29.040
master at it he he built
00:25:30.760
relationships with world
00:25:31.920
leaders all over the globe
00:25:33.720
and Canada had a really
00:25:35.100
valuable presence and a voice
00:25:36.920
in the world when he was
00:25:37.680
Prime Minister because of the
00:25:38.700
power of his personal
00:25:39.420
relationships you know I we
00:25:42.720
gotta we gotta we gotta back
00:25:43.980
up what we say with real
00:25:45.560
dollars real investment we
00:25:46.620
gotta stop playing games with
00:25:47.700
procurement for our military
00:25:48.960
the whole procurement for
00:25:51.300
fighter jets has been a joke
00:25:53.400
it's been an embarrassment you
00:25:55.320
know the process to try to get
00:25:56.920
the shipbuilding strategy up
00:25:57.940
and going thankfully Prime
00:25:59.380
Minister Harper started that
00:26:00.580
program and now it's going we
00:26:01.780
need to maintain that now I
00:26:05.200
I tell people you know it's
00:26:06.820
not rocket science actually
00:26:07.960
well in some cases maybe it is
00:26:08.980
rocket science but this is
00:26:10.600
really no different than a
00:26:11.680
municipal mayor putting
00:26:13.660
together a procurement plan for
00:26:16.000
a fire truck you know I don't
00:26:17.140
argue with the fire chief on how
00:26:18.100
many pumps that truck needs he
00:26:19.320
tells me what we need to serve
00:26:20.560
the needs of our community tells
00:26:21.920
me it's gonna cost us much money
00:26:23.000
and I need it by this day so we
00:26:24.480
put money away prepare for it get
00:26:27.100
ready and have a we have a whole
00:26:28.440
plan to replace that vehicle when
00:26:29.820
the time comes it's a capital
00:26:31.800
asset management plan let's take
00:26:33.600
the politics out of it and just get
00:26:34.620
it done you mentioned China
00:26:36.060
earlier what would you take as your
00:26:38.100
position on Taiwan which has been a
00:26:40.320
lot of cases a very sticking point
00:26:41.700
where no one in the world I should say
00:26:43.740
few people in the world are prepared
00:26:44.940
to really deal with this head-on well
00:26:47.760
I think it's time for us to be honest I
00:26:49.080
mean the one China policy is it's not
00:26:52.760
really true it's not it's not
00:26:54.560
happening Taiwan is a vibrant
00:26:57.320
democratic country it's a you know
00:27:00.080
it's a market country capitalist
00:27:01.940
country and we need to we need to
00:27:04.940
recognize Taiwan for the for the the
00:27:07.400
beacon of freedom that it is and and I
00:27:10.200
think it's time for us to recognize
00:27:11.420
them I you know Taiwan has said they
00:27:13.680
would like to be members of the World
00:27:15.640
Health Organization I think we need to
00:27:18.140
recognize that it's time for us to
00:27:19.380
stop sort of dancing around at that's
00:27:22.860
another way that we Canada can have a
00:27:24.120
principled stance in the world we if
00:27:25.620
we're going to be champions of
00:27:27.000
freedom then let's stand up for those
00:27:28.560
countries that are crying out for their
00:27:30.180
own freedom now would that basically be
00:27:32.520
recognizing Taiwan as an independent
00:27:34.260
sovereign state yes absolutely is that a
00:27:38.100
position that would be disqualifying to
00:27:41.140
a large section of voters I mean we saw in
00:27:42.960
the last election how there were concerns
00:27:46.260
by some of your former colleagues that
00:27:48.180
Chinese influence campaigns were being
00:27:50.100
run against people for their positions
00:27:51.540
I don't think that leaders take
00:27:54.260
positions based on the politics of it
00:27:56.880
leaders do what's right even when it's
00:27:58.740
hard another foreign policy question
00:28:01.020
would you relocate Canada's embassy in
00:28:03.060
Israel to Jerusalem absolutely Israel is
00:28:05.880
a most vibrant democracy it's that it's
00:28:08.520
the only democracy in the Middle East it's
00:28:10.860
a vibrant multicultural nation they are
00:28:13.360
an important ally of Canada's Jerusalem is
00:28:15.820
the capital and absolutely our our
00:28:18.040
embassy should be there I know the
00:28:19.720
interim leader Candace Bergen in her
00:28:21.280
video remarks this morning mentioned
00:28:22.840
that a flat tax is a policy that would
00:28:26.440
be a legitimate viable conservative
00:28:28.420
policy and I don't want to write your
00:28:29.860
platform for you but have you given any
00:28:32.020
thought to some of these larger
00:28:33.760
structural issues that deal in in the
00:28:36.400
tax system yeah we'll have a lot more
00:28:38.740
to say about tax in the coming days
00:28:40.300
obviously what I have talked about so
00:28:42.200
far is eliminating the carbon tax
00:28:44.320
fundamentally this comes down to
00:28:46.120
affordability for Canadians that's that's
00:28:47.740
I think the most important issue we
00:28:49.180
need to address and if there are
00:28:50.860
changes we can make to our tax system to
00:28:52.420
help make life more affordable for
00:28:53.920
Canadians we need to seriously look at
00:28:55.420
that I find that I mean in the past this
00:28:57.500
was something that the conservative
00:28:59.500
government under Stephen Harper did with a
00:29:00.820
lot of the boutique tax credits which
00:29:02.260
certainly make for good politics but at
00:29:04.240
the end I don't feel they simplify the tax
00:29:06.700
system for large sections of Canadians is
00:29:08.920
that something that you'd like to see a tax
00:29:11.300
system that's a lot simpler yeah simpler
00:29:13.580
but what we really do need to do a
00:29:15.560
proper review of it right this is you
00:29:18.440
don't make tax policy I think on the fly I
00:29:20.840
think some thorough analysis and some
00:29:22.760
you know some real work going into it and
00:29:25.100
some thoughtful discussion about it is
00:29:26.520
important so I guess one thing I'd ask
00:29:28.520
you just while you're here looking
00:29:29.960
around at this conference we haven't had
00:29:31.460
one in the last two years because of
00:29:33.560
COVID what's your assessment of the
00:29:35.120
state of the conservative movement right
00:29:36.440
now well I think there's there's some
00:29:38.480
fault lines but I think that's one of the
00:29:40.240
reasons why it's important for us to
00:29:41.560
talk about coming together I said over
00:29:43.600
and over again that unity isn't
00:29:44.920
uniformity we don't all have to agree
00:29:46.300
not to all believe the same thing we
00:29:48.880
have to listen to each other respect
00:29:50.320
each other I think conservatives the
00:29:53.200
movement is other they're craving that
00:29:55.000
conversation I was chatting with the
00:29:57.880
organizers yesterday and and that they
00:29:59.860
they didn't just sell out they
00:30:01.120
oversold it's great it's great to see as
00:30:03.680
many people here as there are they
00:30:06.100
they want to have that conversation I
00:30:07.660
think that those of us running in the
00:30:09.700
leadership race should respect that and
00:30:11.360
have a conversation instead of attacking
00:30:12.700
each other Scott Acheson thank you my
00:30:14.440
pleasure thanks Scott Acheson at the
00:30:17.080
Canada strong and free networking
00:30:18.680
conference and I should put in another
00:30:20.640
plug on May 30th the Independent Press
00:30:22.780
Gallery of Canada is hosting a
00:30:24.960
conservative leadership debate I'll be
00:30:26.440
moderating and we'll also have a panel
00:30:28.460
of journalists including Sheila Gunn-Reed
00:30:30.220
Derek Fildebrandt and Rupa Subramanya
00:30:32.740
asking questions of the candidate that we
00:30:35.160
hope will be of interest to those of you
00:30:37.460
tuning in and in general supporters of
00:30:39.560
independent media and we're doing it on
00:30:41.800
May 30th because it's before the
00:30:43.700
membership cutoff so people that aren't
00:30:45.340
Conservative Party of Canada members can
00:30:47.300
hear what they candidates have to say and
00:30:49.540
decide if they want to join and
00:30:51.200
participate in the process a bit further
00:30:53.460
or just again just watch for the sake of
00:30:55.320
watching which I think is also important
00:30:57.140
to do even if you don't plan on voting
00:30:58.880
for the people so that's coming up May 30th
00:31:00.980
if you want to you can go get tickets to see
00:31:02.920
it in person it's going to be in the
00:31:04.920
Toronto area and you'll be able to watch
00:31:07.100
it online if not but that's at
00:31:08.860
independentpressgallery.ca and with that
00:31:11.980
I have to bid you adieu but we have some
00:31:13.960
big announcements coming up for something
00:31:15.280
I'm working on for later this week so
00:31:17.420
we'll talk about that on the next show
00:31:18.840
and I hope you have a wonderful wonderful
00:31:21.260
rest of the week otherwise this is
00:31:23.020
Canada's most irreverent talk show
00:31:24.880
the Andrew Lawton show on True North
00:31:26.760
thank you God bless and good day to you
00:31:28.640
all thanks for listening to the Andrew
00:31:30.180
Lawton show support the program by
00:31:32.240
donating to True North at www.tnc.news
Link copied!