00:30:36.600I mean, I just don't understand how you can continue to be a member of parliament
00:30:41.160if we found that you take money from foreign adversarial state, like it just doesn't even
00:30:46.120compute. Like why, why are they still here? Why are they still getting money? Why are they still
00:30:49.560representing us? Like name them and fire them. And I don't even care what political party they're
00:30:54.360affiliated with. Like those people should not get to serve in public office in Canada. I really,
00:31:00.120really hope that this report, you know, allows Canada to make some progress here because right now
00:31:05.800it is a bit of a joke how weak and insecure our system is. Okay, Rachel, let's talk about the
00:31:11.640latest when it comes to the libs and Trump's tariffs. So I want to talk about this report
00:31:16.920was in the global mail this morning. This is just so typical Ottawa, so typical, like the way that
00:31:22.040liberals react to threats. Anytime there's an issue, it has to be a national strategy. So the global mail
00:31:30.040basically just reporting that Ottawa is planning pandemic level relief for workers and businesses
00:31:36.920if Trump imposes tariffs. So anytime there's a problem, the federal government will sweep in
00:31:42.040with a national plan, a national plan, pandemic level relief. Let's just like pause for a second
00:31:47.960here. Canada's broke. Canada's bankrupt. Canada spent way too much money because Justin Trudeau shut down
00:31:53.480the economy during the pandemic. And then he paid everybody to not work for a couple of years. And because of
00:31:58.360that our country is bankrupt, basically. And now he's saying, hey, we can just do it all again.
00:32:02.840We'll just tap that magic money tree, borrow more money, leverage the future for future Canadians,
00:32:09.320young Canadians, borrow more, and we will pay everybody again if Trump imposes these tariffs.
00:32:14.520So according to the global mail's report here, it says that the federal government is planning a
00:32:18.600multi-billion dollar pandemic style bailout for workers and businesses. If U.S. President Donald Trump
00:32:23.720follows through on his threat to impose a 25% tariff on Canadian goods as early as Feb 1,
00:32:28.360two sources say. The sources said that some of the measures such as waiving a one-week waiting
00:32:33.000period for employment insurance benefits do not require parliamentary approval. Of course,
00:32:37.080an author always going to find ways, Rachel, to do things without actually getting the consent of
00:32:41.560the governed here. It says the bulk of potential spending on new programs to help laid off workers and
00:32:46.600businesses affected by tariffs will require legislative approval, which will not take place until
00:32:51.240employment resumes all the way into March. This just drives me absolutely crazy. The liberals will
00:32:57.080always take the wrong approach, right? Like Trump makes it pretty simple. He says, hey guys, your border
00:33:01.480is broken. Hey guys, you're sending all these horrible drugs into our country. Fix those problems. And what
00:33:06.360does Trudeau say? Hey, I've got a better solution. Why don't we just print all the money in the world and
00:33:10.920pay everybody instead? What are your thoughts on this? Well, to your point, we can't afford this. We're still
00:33:18.120paying for the pandemic relief that was offered a few years ago. I mean, our children's children's
00:33:23.320children is going to be paying for it. Canadians have never felt their dollar being worth less. Now
00:33:28.040the government wants to print even more money. It's like Canadians are going to be paying for
00:33:32.120these tariffs over and over again, because it's like, we're going to be paying for the retaliatory
00:33:35.320tariffs. We're going to be paying for the higher cost of goods. We're going to be paying for it and
00:33:38.120that our money is going to be costing even less. So there just really seems to be no end for the suffering
00:33:42.520of the Canadian people and our absolutely valueless dollar right now. But the thing that probably irks
00:33:47.480me even more than this is parliament is prorogued. So how is the government getting permission to print
00:33:52.440this money and to spend this money? It's the same thing that we're seeing right now with the capital
00:33:56.680gains tax increase. It's that that was never debated or passed by parliament. And yet the CRA just said,
00:34:04.600well, you know, it was introduced. So we're going to go ahead and enforce it. Anyways,
00:34:08.200we've done some similar things in the past. Now, the Canadian taxpayers taxpayers federation is
00:34:13.320actually taking the CRA to court over this saying you have no right to implement this tax hike that
00:34:19.880the the MPs have not passed or as I said, even debated. And I certainly hope they will be fruitful
00:34:26.280in their efforts. But it's again, time and time again, as I just said, the Canadian people, we elect
00:34:31.560officials, they are supposed to rule for us. But that is not how our system works because it is so
00:34:35.800broken and it is not working anymore. Absolutely. And I think I think just the idea that we can
00:34:41.160like, okay, we can withstand this, we'll just start printing more money. That's that's the kind of
00:34:45.320thinking that got us into this problem. Okay, so Chrystia Freeland, who's running for a Liberal
00:34:49.720Leader on Monday, she outlined her plan to protect the economy against Trump, which includes dollar for
00:34:55.640dollar retaliatory goods. So she put out this post here, just basically saying what what she would do
00:35:04.600in terms of to your point, you know, taxing Canadians on the money that we send out and taxing
00:35:09.720it through the money that we get in. I don't think a trade war is a solution. But it seems to be the way
00:35:14.040that these Liberals are going. Likewise, you had Foreign Minister Melanie Jolie talking about how
00:35:20.360diplomacy can work. So this is a clip from her on Monday, telling reporters how she thinks that we
00:35:26.840should negotiate with the Americans. When it comes to preventing tariffs,
00:35:32.680this is our number one priority. And we're working at it every day. Now, we believe that diplomacy can
00:35:39.000work. And that's why we're having private conversations. And we won't negotiate on, you know,
00:35:46.440in front of the public, we believe that our arguments are strong. I think that I've had numerous
00:35:54.040conversations where the reaction was actually very positive. But meanwhile, there's still a lot of
00:36:00.280work. This administration in the US is very unpredictable. So we have to be ready and working
00:36:06.520on both fronts, like I was saying, preventing tariffs and at the same time working on our results.
00:36:12.680Rachel, do you have faith in these people? Do you have faith that they are going to be able to
00:36:15.960negotiate and stop Trump? Well, absolutely not. But I just want to point out a couple things.
00:36:21.640First and foremost, if you listen to Melanie Jolie frequently, she basically always has the same
00:36:27.000talking point when she's being interviewed, which is I'm not going to tell you the plan right now.
00:36:31.720I'm not going to negotiate in front of the public because they don't have a plan. She's got no ideas.
00:36:36.280You can hear it in her delivery that she's not confident in what she's saying. She doesn't even
00:36:40.920believe herself. So I don't know why she expects you or I are going to believe her. We can see that
00:36:45.320she's feeling unsure and insecure in her ability to perform this job. She's certainly not adept
00:36:51.000at it. And the other thing that I would say is when she talks about diplomacy, you guys are not
00:36:56.280being diplomats in the way that you should be. You're talking about the need for diplomacy. Then
00:36:59.880why aren't you doing that? Why did you choose to hold a caucus retreat to the expense of Canadian
00:37:06.280taxpayers rather than going down to DC during the inauguration and doing everything you can to get
00:37:12.840meetings with the top officials and make the case for Canada? They have done nothing. I recently had
00:37:18.920a former special advisor to Jason Kenney on the Rachel Parker show, David Knightlag, and he said,
00:37:24.360you know, I'm in DC. He was in DC for the inauguration. He was talking to a number of people
00:37:29.080that he knows that are in the Trump administration. And they noticed that no one from the reigning
00:37:36.200liberal party was in DC trying to get meetings. And they also noticed that Danielle Smith from Alberta was
00:37:42.360there doing everything she could to make the case for Alberta. And in some sense, you know,
00:37:45.720she did even receive some from grace from, from Donald Trump from that. They noticed that Daniel
00:37:49.960Smith was there, but Ottawa's absence was never more clear and they are not delivering for Canadians
00:37:56.440because they simply get, cannot get past their dislike of Trump. And, and to the point that they've
00:38:01.320even conceded at doing their jobs at this point, they're not willing to go and meet with him.
00:38:05.560They're not willing to make the case for Canada. They are simply standing back and saying,
00:38:09.720we've tried everything when in reality, they've tried nothing.
00:38:12.760It was such a great interview that you did there with David and he made so many good points. I think
00:38:17.320this is, there's no doubt why 77% of Canadians want an election. If you want an election,
00:38:22.520if you're watching this right now or listening to this right now, head on over to my website,
00:38:25.480candicemalcolm.com, sign my petition. I'm trying to get as many signatures as possible so that I can
00:38:31.400personally deliver this petition to the governor general to demand an election. Canadians deserve an election.
00:38:36.840We deserve a government that has a mandate to be down there negotiating with Trump on our behalf,
00:38:42.680not this ragtag group, especially not Justin Trudeau. You know, it's, I think that the point that
00:38:50.920they weren't down there, they weren't working the room, you know, Danielle went to Mar-a-Lago.
00:38:54.520Danielle Smith went to the inauguration and it's not just about glad handing with Trump. I know like so
00:39:01.400many liberals and people on the left, you know, were accusing Danielle Smith of being an appeaser,
00:39:06.840you know, of appeasement to Trump or being a traitor or undermining the attempts. It's like,
00:39:12.040well, at least she was there. She was making an attempt to befriend these people. And that is what
00:39:16.920diplomacy is all about. I think Danielle took a, you know, she, she was the one that took the risk
00:39:22.200and took a step out there and people are coming around. You know, at first, I think a lot of Canadians
00:39:26.440were surprised to see that. And now more and more, um, she's not a lone wolf on the provincial
00:39:31.320response. So True North is reporting that, um, we've seen provincial shifts when it comes to
00:39:37.160tariffs. Smith no longer no lone wolf on provincial response to tariffs as Quebec and Saskatchewan
00:39:44.280shift. So, um, Smith's sentiment was recently echoed by Quebec Premier Francois Legault,
00:39:49.880who said any retaliatory action involving energy exports south of the border should first require
00:39:55.320the approval of provinces and those affected regarding energy. I think it's important
00:40:00.040that it affects a province that this province has to give its consent. Uh, first, likewise,
00:40:05.880the leader of the bloc Quebecois said, uh, absolutely no to a embargo on Canadian oil,
00:40:11.720of course, because the oil that Quebec gets from Alberta actually goes through the United States. So
00:40:17.480any embargo would just shut off all of central Canada from Sarnia, all the way up to Montreal.
00:40:22.040So any, anyone suggesting that I'm sorry, but they're an idiot and you shouldn't listen to them.
00:40:26.520Uh, likewise, Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe has come out, um, supporting something more similar to
00:40:33.000Danielle Smith. He's expressed his desire for a similar approach on the issue. He said,
00:40:37.000Saskatchewan is most certainly not supportive of export tariffs and will be working actively to
00:40:42.040ensure an export tariff couldn't be applied on Saskatchewan products. Um, so Danielle Smith,
00:40:48.520um, taking the lead and others are following. What's your make of this Rachel?
00:40:53.400I think that Danielle really went out on a limb with her approach to the trade war, um, and Donald
00:41:00.040Trump's threat of tariffs. And she was pretty roundly criticized for that. We saw the establishment
00:41:05.080media really going after her. She was accused of being a traitor, really horrible things.
00:41:09.640And I think that it's paying off for her, not only on the home front, but also nationally. So let's
00:41:15.480start by talking about Alberta first, certainly her approach to advocate for Alberta and for
00:41:20.520Alberta's interests first is what the Albertan people want. We elected a premier to stand up for
00:41:26.600our interests, not to stand up for Ottawa, especially at a time when there was so much friction between the
00:41:31.480province of Alberta and the federal government who has seemed really not to be vested in or care about
00:41:37.560our economy, um, and to continuously attack Alberta's energy. And the point that, that Danielle Smith
00:41:43.000made was we tried to expand our exports to go west or to go east. And the rest of Canada said no. And so
00:41:50.360we are entirely reliant on our exports to the United States for our economy and for the Alberta
00:41:55.960government to generate revenue. And if you shut that off, it will devastate, it will devastate the
00:42:01.640Alberta economy. And so we have no choice but to continue having a positive trade relationship with
00:42:07.000the United States. And I think she recognized that the relationship between Justin Trudeau and between
00:42:11.800Donald Trump had completely broken down. And so she took matters into her own hands and she went over to
00:42:16.280the stage and she began advocating for Alberta. And initially we saw that the rest of Canada was attacking
00:42:21.080her for this. And now we've seen sentiment shift, not only in public opinion, but also in the fact that
00:42:26.280other premiers are also following suit because I think they're recognizing that not only would a ban or
00:42:33.560retaliatory tariffs impact them, as you said, Alberta's energy also lights up Ontario and Quebec. So it's not simply a
00:42:39.800matter of just turning off the pipes because it will impact the rest of Canada, but also that her
00:42:45.480approach with Donald Trump is working and that the Americans do want collaboration with Canada,
00:42:50.600but they're also tired of a Canadian government that really hasn't done its part, for example,
00:42:55.320with meeting its NATO commitments with protecting its border. And yeah, I know people always say, well,
00:43:00.200there's the immigration crisis is way worse at the Mexican US border than the Canada US border.
00:43:05.240Okay. But we also have like really serious terrorists here. We had one of India's most
00:43:10.760wanted terrorists in Canada. The United States is paying attention to this. They recognize that
00:43:15.000our security is abysmal and they realize how easy it is for these people to cross from Canada into the
00:43:20.120United States. And so what America is really asking is they're saying, Canada, you haven't done
00:43:24.920your part for nine years. It's time to do your part again. And then we can maybe look at, you know,
00:43:29.960not implementing these tariffs. But right now, Canada is in a very, very weak position. And I
00:43:34.840think for the people who are criticizing Donald Trump for the economic impact that we're about to
00:43:39.960feel from the tariffs are severely misguided. It is right that he would do the best by his country
00:43:45.560and that he would protect our national, his national interests. I just wish that we had a
00:43:49.560prime minister who also cared about protecting our national interests.
00:43:52.920And there's no way that Canada's vetting when it comes to national security. We just don't
00:43:56.520vet the way that the Americans do. We used to, and we should, but we certainly do,
00:44:00.440which is why we end up with terrorists. And to your point, I mean, we reported this in True North,
00:44:04.600that the number of people on terror watch lists sneaking into the United States from Canada is
00:44:11.560five times more than Mexico. So yes, Mexico has far more people coming through the border. But when it
00:44:18.040comes to the actual terrorists, there's actually significantly more from Canada. Let's go back
00:44:22.760to Danielle Smith, though. She was on with Vassie Capellos on Sunday evening, talking about how she
00:44:29.240wants to avoid a trade war. So, you know, this is her kind of marquee position that we don't want to do
00:44:34.520a tit for tat. It's not a good idea to have a trade war with a trading partner who's so much bigger
00:44:40.440than you, so much more powerful than you and can more easily, you know, have tariffs without such a big
00:44:49.640notice. So let's play this clip of Danielle on CTV question period.
00:44:55.080I always think that you should try to avoid a fight, especially when you've got, you know,
00:44:59.080a bigger, a bigger adversary that you're fighting against. The American economy is 10 times the size
00:45:03.880of Canada. And if we get into some kind of tit for tat retaliatory tariffs, neither country is going to
00:45:10.680benefit from that. And Canadian consumers are going to be harmed. That's why my approach has been,
00:45:15.080what can we do to avoid the fight? That being said, I think we all know, based on previous experience,
00:45:20.360that having a proportionate responses is what is normally expected when these kinds of things
00:45:25.800occur. And so I know that the federal government is working on what that proportionate response
00:45:30.520would look like. I hope we don't have to roll it out at all. I hope we can avoid tariffs altogether.
00:45:36.360And I'll just play one more clip. This is the same interview a little later on. She talks about
00:45:40.360how Albertans are just not going to accept an export tax on their products.
00:45:45.960I've asked the federal government on I don't even know how many occasions over the last number of
00:45:49.080years about those extra markets and building capacity to them. But even putting that aside
00:45:54.360for a moment, we're in the moment we're in. I've also asked ministers in the past week if they would
00:45:58.760do the same thing that that people are threatening over oil with auto exports, which would have a
00:46:03.000equally proportionate impact on Ontario. And they said yes, like they're not,
00:46:06.440they're not making it a national unity crisis, aren't you? I don't think that will happen,
00:46:12.600first of all. But they're not taking it off the table. That's the point, right? Maybe logistically,
00:46:17.080like you say, both are not really great options, but they're not saying, no, I would never do that.
00:46:22.280Well, I think the problem that we saw is that we were getting together as a group of premiers and
00:46:26.920the prime minister saying, let's not negotiate this in public. And I did my part saying, let's focus on
00:46:33.240the things that we know the Americans care about, national security and border security.
00:46:36.920And everybody else went off freelancing. And the thing they kept returning to
00:46:40.120was punishing Alberta and punishing energy. So I just wanted to make sure
00:46:44.200that we get back to talking about the things that unite us rather than divide us. And so
00:46:49.320Albertans are just simply not going to accept an export tax on this product. They're not going
00:46:54.840to accept the federal government blocking the export of this vital product. And I don't think
00:46:59.320that that demonstrates to the Americans that we are a reliable trading partner, which is what we
00:47:03.960are trying to do. Danielle Smith is just 100% right there. She is making the points and she's the one
00:47:10.040that's standing up, not just for Albertans. Yes, she is standing up for Albertans. And I think they
00:47:13.240appreciate that. You can let me know what you think. But she's standing up for, I think, what's in the
00:47:16.440best interest of all Canadians by avoiding a trade war. What do you think? That's exactly what I've been
00:47:21.880hearing from people who are on the ground. They're saying that Danielle Smith has been accused of being a
00:47:27.560Canadian trader. But when she's in Washington, DC, and when she's at Mar-a-Lago, she is playing for
00:47:32.920Team Canada. She is fighting for all of Canada when she's trying to secure a deal. And as she has said
00:47:37.560repeatedly, and she's been the one saying this the loudest from the beginning, let's do our best to
00:47:42.440avoid these tariffs. And I just can't help but wonder why we haven't heard that same line from
00:47:46.520other premiers. It's immediately been, okay, well, if you if you do this to us, and we're going to do that
00:47:51.400to you. Exactly as she said, it's been a tit for tat, instead of understanding the Americans concerns
00:47:57.320and saying we do not want these tariffs, tell us exactly what we need to do to avoid them, we will
00:48:01.000get serious about security at the border, we will get serious about vetting newcomers to Canada. And
00:48:06.040we are willing to meet you where you're at to avoid these tariffs. That has never really been the
00:48:10.120federal government's approach. They're really just too pigheaded to look at their own mistakes,
00:48:15.240realize where they went wrong. And certainly to make some of the changes that Donald Trump has
00:48:19.320requested, they would be acknowledging error in their immigration policy and in their vetting policy.
00:48:24.760And we know that Justin Trudeau and his Liberal Party, they are not willing to even own an ounce of
00:48:30.280their mistakes. They are so pigheaded when it comes to making changes that would benefit Canadians,
00:48:36.280because it might mean an acknowledgement of wrongdoing on their part. And I believe that
00:48:40.120is a big part of the reason why we're seeing them proceed in the manner that they have because
00:48:43.640they are not willing to change their policy, because it would be acknowledging wrongdoing.
00:48:48.040That's so true. And you know, at this point, if they were to do an about face on the major issues
00:48:52.760that Trump cares about, like immigration, national security, and drugs, I mean, those are like
00:48:56.600Justin Trudeau's legacy there, right? So it would be basically be an admission that his entire time
00:49:01.880as Prime Minister has been an absolute disaster, which of course it has. I want to show you one more
00:49:05.720clip of our friend Danielle Smith there, who is down on American television talking to News Nation's
00:49:10.680Laura Ingalls. So this accusation that somehow Smith is selling out Canada, she puts that to rest,
00:49:15.800saying that best friends should never move in together. So really just taking the idea of a
00:49:20.440merger right off the table. Let's play that clip. Do you think that Trump should acquire Greenland and
00:49:26.280Canada? I think we want to continue to be best friends with the United States. There's a phrase
00:49:32.200that best friends shouldn't move in together. We have a very strong long term relationship with
00:49:36.440the United States. It's been terror free for much of it in the last number of decades. We know that we
00:49:42.120support the Americans and their aspiration for energy dominance, which is connected to national
00:49:47.080security. Part of the reason why the Americans have been able to export so much oil internationally
00:49:53.720to achieve their targets and achieve the support of their allies is because Canada backfills. We have
00:50:00.040a heavy oil that goes into U.S. refineries to keep prices low for American consumers, and then that
00:50:05.880allows the Americans to export their product around the world. You make the same case on all the critical
00:50:11.080minerals. I mean, we're watching as China is trying to cut off the critical mineral supply chain to the
00:50:17.000United States for germanium and gallium and antimony. We've got all of that in Canada. We've got uranium,
00:50:22.120which we think would be a great partner for the United States in providing that security. So I think
00:50:25.880we've got a partnership that works and we want to maintain that. Great response there. But I want to
00:50:31.880ask you, Rachel, I've been talking about this quite a bit on my podcast. What is the response that you're
00:50:36.280hearing from folks in Alberta when it comes to this idea of a merger? Because I remember we did an
00:50:40.040event at True North Nation. Well, we do it every year, but I was there two years ago. And there
00:50:44.760was a group of kind of noisy fellows with these hats on that said Alberta, USA, and they were really
00:50:50.520big on Alberta becoming the 51st state. I think most people in the room didn't agree with them,
00:50:54.440but they certainly wanted to talk about their ideas to everyone. I think that there's, especially among
00:51:00.440young Canadians, so your generation, I think like 18 to 30 year olds had the highest number, like 40%
00:51:05.880saying that they would potentially move to the United States if they were offered citizenship.
00:51:10.600What, what's your take on the seriousness of that? Whether you think that it's an offer that
00:51:16.040it would pique the interest of Albertans? And then you can respond to what Danielle just said in that
00:51:20.680clip. There's definitely a small but vocal minority of people here in Alberta who like the idea of
00:51:28.520Canada joining the United States, or at least even Alberta joining the United States. I did a show on
00:51:34.040this. I sort of said, I don't think that this is a good idea. And what I always go back to is,
00:51:38.120I just don't really want to be under an even bigger federal government. I think that the fact
00:51:42.280that our countries are so big and we have a federal government who has so much power over what's
00:51:46.440happening in a place so far away is one of the big problems that we see in Canada. And I don't think
00:51:51.240that joining the United States would solve that. And even while you might like their very effective
00:51:55.720Republican president now, there's not always going to be a Republican president in the White House.
00:52:01.320Imagine being led by Joe Biden. I mean, it's not always going to look as good as it is until you
00:52:06.840need to think about these things in a broader context than in just a moment and a place in time.
00:52:11.720And so while I would say that there is a small minority of people who support that idea, what I'm
00:52:16.360actually hearing even more of is the feelings of Western alienation that are growing. There is,
00:52:21.960and there will always be, a separatist movement in Alberta. And I can feel and hear that separatist
00:52:27.880movement is really growing traction right now, especially when you hear things like Ottawa saying
00:52:32.360they're going to shut off the taps or they're going to impose a export levy. Separated separatism
00:52:38.360in Alberta has always been around. I remember growing up and learning about, you know, the West
00:52:43.240wants in led by Preston Manning. And what I'm hearing right now is the West wants out. And I know that
00:52:48.280there are separatists who were organizing. And I think that if we continue to see this trend from a
00:52:52.360federal government, that movement will only pick up steam. Now, if we see a conservative
00:52:56.680government be elected, the separatist movement will certainly wane, but it will never go away.
00:53:01.400And so I would say that that's the broader trend of what I'm seeing with these negotiations with
00:53:05.800America and the trade where that we're seeing is that Alberta, a lot of Albertans are just tired
00:53:09.960of federalism and they don't trust the federal government to get the job done anymore. I think
00:53:14.200that Danielle Smith had, you know, a pretty effective way of responding to that question with,
00:53:18.520you know, her little analogy about not moving in with a best friend.
00:53:21.480And obviously, she would be renounced as a traitor if she said that Canada or Alberta should
00:53:27.320join the US. So she handled that very well. And as I've said, I just I don't think it's a good idea.
00:53:32.200I'm not really interested in being guided by a bigger federal government. And look, a lot of
00:53:36.760people say, oh, America and Canada, they're so similar. And I mean, sure, if you compare Canada
00:53:41.720and the United States to say to a place like Japan or China, then we are quite similar. But having spent
00:53:46.440a significant amount of time in both countries, I do believe that they are very different and that each of
00:53:50.440the country has significantly different attitudes. And so I don't think that it would be a seamless
00:53:55.240cultural blend. And I think that Americans and frustrated Americans and Canadians would be quite
00:54:00.440frustrated with each other, actually, and the different cultural attitudes that come with each
00:54:05.320nation state. Well, it does depend on the region, right? Like I grew up in Vancouver and whenever I
00:54:10.520meet someone from Seattle, like it's like they're like a long lost sibling. Like it's like we have the same
00:54:14.840kind of ethos and values when it comes to like nature and being outside being connected to nature
00:54:20.600and you're growing up in the Pacific Northwest, like commiserating over the terrible rainy weather.
00:54:25.080Like I think that there are certain parts of the country that are quite similar. And then other
00:54:29.480parts that are like wildly different. Like I think the example would be like Montreal and like Dallas,
00:54:35.320Texas, like, you know, there's nothing a lot, there's not a lot in common between those two places. So
00:54:40.520I definitely see your point and probably agree with it. Okay, I want to move on. This is the last
00:54:45.560topic we're going to cover on the show today before we move on. I'm not sure if you saw this over the
00:54:49.640weekend, we got a little preview of, you know, potentially, the next, the next prime minister,
00:54:55.720future prime minister of this country. If, you know, things go horribly, horribly wrong. This is
00:55:00.760Justin Trudeau, 17 year old son, Xavier Trudeau, releasing his own, I guess, a preview for his
00:55:08.840upcoming R&B album. So he's releasing a song called till the night's done. And he put this out. So
00:55:16.200let's play this little promo teaser that he put out online.
00:55:30.840God help us if he comes prime minister one day, or our children. But I mean, maybe, maybe it's a good
00:55:41.480thing. Maybe he's interested in music and not interested in politics, like his dad, and his
00:55:45.400grandpa there. But I kind of feel sorry for him, because I just know that the people online do not
00:55:51.480like Justin Trudeau, that people do not like him, and they will take out their rage and anger on his son.
00:55:57.320Remember that Justin Trudeau posted this on Instagram back in October of 2024. He said that
00:56:04.520a dad's number one job is to embarrass his son. And then he talked about how him and his son
00:56:11.080visit a runway up in the north. I think we have a video of this just showing their embarrassing antics here.
00:56:17.480Like Justin Trudeau is at the point in his career where everything he does will get trolled, and there'll be nasty nasty comments. And you kind of feel sorry for the
00:56:23.480sun for what is going to come. I'm sure. With this, I know that the Economic Times is already covering this.
00:56:29.480Economic Times of India reported on the story. And look at the photo that they included there.
00:56:35.480A very, very embarrassing picture that Justin Trudeau posted, wearing an oversized pink hoodie,
00:56:45.480with his son wearing an undersized tight pink t shirt going to the Barbie movie last year.
00:56:51.480Yeah, I don't know. I don't know what else to say. Rachel, what do you make of this?
00:56:55.480I think that my approach to this is unique? I haven't seen a lot of people follow suit, but, you know, compared to Justin Trudeau, I have a tiny, tiny, tiny public profile.
00:57:09.480But, you know, I still have a bit of a public profile, but, you know, I still have a bit of a public profile aroundos.
00:57:15.480I don't know. I still have a bit of a public profile. But I have a public profile, and I still have a public profile.
00:57:23.480but you know, I still have a bit of a public profile and so does my husband. And so in respect
00:57:28.220to that, I don't post things about my kids online because I know that there's a lot of people who
00:57:33.100hate us, who hate our political views. And I believe that it is my responsibility to protect
00:57:38.200my son to the best of my ability. And so for the time being, I do not post pictures of him online.
00:57:43.120I do not tell stories about him online. I keep my information about my son private because I want
00:57:49.440to protect him. And you know, a lot of people are very free with posting pictures of their kids
00:57:53.380online. And if you don't have a public profile, then maybe you're safe to do so. I'm still not
00:57:58.160totally sold on that. And so I just like to keep my private life, my private life. And you know,
00:58:02.740at a certain point, my kids, they will be old enough to make that decision for themselves.
00:58:05.980And I think that at times we've seen Trudeau almost set his kids up for failure with some of the
00:58:10.400weird things he's posted about them. Like that picture of him and his son in the pink, like you
00:58:14.640just knew that that was going to receive so much hate. And maybe Justin Trudeau is a hardened
00:58:19.920political operative who can handle that kind of public pressure. But I don't think that any kid
00:58:24.540should have to, you know, you're going to be inclined as a kid to go look at that picture,
00:58:28.720to go look at the comments underneath it and see all the hateful things that people are saying on you.
00:58:32.720And I can't imagine that that would be very healthy for a young man still developing psyche.
00:58:39.200And you know, I guess Justin Trudeau's kid, he's old enough now that he's decided he wants to get into
00:58:43.800music. And you know, maybe he's old enough that he can make that decision for himself.
00:58:47.800I think to your point, you know, maybe this would have been a good time for parents to say,
00:58:51.480why don't you just wait, you know, till I'm out of politics for a little longer,
00:58:54.600let things cool down till I'm everyone's not talking about me so much. And then why don't
00:58:58.600you go ahead and and go ahead with your music career. But right now, it's just I'm afraid that
00:59:02.920the way that people feel about me will really get in the way of your music career. And I just don't think
00:59:07.880we've seen a lot of good judgment. And you know, his kid is still a kid. And I obviously am not a fan of
00:59:12.600Justin Trudeau. But I would never say anything hurtful that someone else's children because
00:59:17.800they are still child. And I think that's just over the line. But you know, to the point about
00:59:21.640the music, there was a period of my life, I know some people are going to judge me for this where
00:59:24.760I did like R&B music, I liked the type of music that we just listened to there no longer. I'm glad
00:59:29.720to say that my tastes have matured and developed. But you know, what we can really see in that brief,
00:59:34.360brief little bit of a music video that was showed is it's really money that is elevating this.
00:59:39.400It's not talent. I mean, his singing is barely above a mumble. And obviously, there's some good
00:59:44.120editing work done there. There's, you know, some good audio tuning there to make it sound really
00:59:48.280cool and interesting. But from what I've seen so far, you know, I doubt that he's going to have much
00:59:52.680musical prowess. But obviously, his family has the ability to pay for this as so often
00:59:58.520with people who seek to be artists nowadays.
01:00:01.080Amy Quinton Well, I completely agree with your point about
01:00:04.760not posting pictures of your children online. I'm a big supporter and proponent of the digital
01:00:10.440modesty movement. This idea that like my kids are not it's not that they don't belong to me. And like,
01:00:16.520I don't I don't put their pictures up like their their images are private into our family. And they
01:00:21.480are for our family only. And it is a very bad idea, I think, for people to post pictures of their kids,
01:00:26.920especially we see so many sort of young influencers or young moms that try to become famous based on
01:00:33.160sometimes posting like super private pictures of their children, children have no say, of course,
01:00:39.080in whether or not their their images are going to get put online. So we adhere to that digital modesty
01:00:43.640as well. And it's such a great way to live. Because when you're obsessed with Instagram and posting the
01:00:49.160latest thing that happens, it's like that's all you think about and it takes over. When you just decide
01:00:53.000to like put the phone away and be present with your children, not trying to like capture pictures
01:00:58.120of every minute, you know, it just allows you to appreciate them and enjoy them. So much more like
01:01:03.080I, I send pictures to like our family group chat. You know, I send around a picture of the kids in the
01:01:08.680annual Christmas card. And that's, that's, that's about it. Because I don't think that people should
01:01:13.400post photos of your kids. So we're in complete agreement on that one, Rachel and I do sort of feel
01:01:18.440for Xavier. I think that this is probably not going to go very well for him. Last word to you.
01:01:26.520Yeah, no, I'm glad to hear that you're in agreement on that. I think it's considered, you know,
01:01:29.960controversial because people love to post photos of their kids. But there's a lot of really scary
01:01:35.960and gross things that people can do to images of your kids and ways that they can manipulate them. So
01:01:40.200I would just encourage, you know, any parents out there to spend a little bit more time thinking
01:01:44.520about it. And don't just do something that has always been done because there's a lot of technology
01:01:49.560has changed our society very rapidly over a short number of years. And it seems to be only now that
01:01:54.920people are pausing and saying, Hmm, we haven't really thought about all the ethical implications of
01:01:59.800some of the actions that we're taking that seem so normalized. And I would just encourage everyone
01:02:03.640to do so. Great. Well, Rachel Parker, thank you so much for joining the show. It's been so fun to have
01:02:08.040you on. Everyone go check out the Rachel Parker show. Thanks for joining us, Rachel. Hope to be back.
01:02:15.080Okay. All right, everyone. Thanks so much for tuning in. I'm Candace Malcolm. This is
01:02:17.720Candace Malcolm show. Have a great day. We'll be back tomorrow with all the news. God bless.