ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- May 21, 2023
Pilots take legal action against federal vaccine mandate
Episode Stats
Length
20 minutes
Words per Minute
202.7972
Word Count
4,234
Sentence Count
197
Hate Speech Sentences
1
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
I want to turn our attention to this proposed class action that's been filed against the
00:00:13.740
federal government, specifically Transport Canada, and it is a proposed class action
00:00:18.940
on the vaccine mandate for people in the aviation sector specifically, which was
00:00:24.960
technically done under different orders than the general federally regulated workplace vaccine
00:00:30.960
mandate. But this was an order that meant flight attendants, pilots, other people working in this
00:00:36.860
industry would be terminated, would be suspended, would in some cases be coerced into early
00:00:43.100
retirement. And we'll talk about that in just a couple of moments here. But there is a proposed
00:00:47.460
class action that's been filed on behalf of Free to Fly Canada. There are three representative
00:00:53.040
plaintiffs, Greg Hill, Brent Warren, and Tanya Lewis. But ultimately, anyone who is affected
00:00:58.880
by this, if the class action is approved and certified, will be a beneficiary of this. So
00:01:04.660
basically, unvaccinated employees in Canada's aviation sector. I want to welcome to the show
00:01:09.940
from Free to Fly Canada, Greg Hill, who is a pilot with a major Canadian airline and joins me now.
00:01:16.360
Greg, it's good to talk to you. Thanks for coming on today.
00:01:19.480
Thanks so much to be, appreciate being here, Andrew. Thanks so much.
00:01:22.740
Now, I should say, I actually happened to meet you on a flight when you were working and you got
00:01:27.460
me safely to my destination, which I appreciated. So in your case, you've been able to go back to
00:01:32.920
work. But for some of your colleagues, that wasn't the case, as I understand it.
00:01:37.460
Yeah, it's been quite a journey. I think for all of us, the last two or three years have almost
00:01:41.860
disappeared into a somewhat dark gray continuum. So it's hard to remember exactly what happened when,
00:01:47.440
but certainly those of us that were out of work for an extended period of time, remember that well.
00:01:53.280
And as you point out, there are some of my colleagues who are not back to work when the
00:01:59.080
mandate was suspended last June. The majority did go back to work slowly over the next month or two,
00:02:04.920
generally speaking. But there are a group of employees at WestJet, for one thing, that refused
00:02:11.640
to sign a very egregious piece of memorandum of understanding, essentially agreeing, which required
00:02:21.360
them essentially to go against their conscience and say, well, WestJet did respect my charter rights, WestJet
00:02:28.020
did respect human rights, sign this document, and then you can have your job back. And to their
00:02:33.000
credit, as far as I know, to a single man and woman, they refused to do so because these are
00:02:38.660
people of principle that we're not going to compromise based on conscience. So I appreciate
00:02:43.480
you bringing that up because there does seem to be a pervasive attitude that we're past this,
00:02:48.120
that we've moved on. I was just speaking to a friend of mine that's in healthcare. We've got a
00:02:52.620
couple in my local community, and people think they've all gone back to work. Well, they haven't.
00:02:56.400
There's a cabal amongst the hospitals, certainly in the province of Ontario, that is not bringing
00:03:01.700
them back to the detriment of the population as a whole, who are short of doctors and nurses and
00:03:07.500
other staff in hospitals who they simply have not brought back. So it's a great thing to bring up
00:03:11.640
because it's not well understood. Let's talk about what the actual, we don't need to get into the
00:03:17.480
legal weeds, but what is the real objection here? I mean, as I understand it, the case really hinges on
00:03:23.380
that the government was forcing violation of the contracts that you and your colleagues had. And
00:03:29.380
I mean, obviously, we know that there are, in some cases, pretty stringent protections
00:03:33.800
through collective bargaining that have been fought. And then the government just comes in
00:03:37.680
with this mandate that trumps that. Right. Well, I mean, the primary strategy
00:03:42.680
and the angle here. And listen, we've sat back and watched the, I'll call it challenging judicial
00:03:50.340
landscape in this country for the past year or so. And I think that's, we're certainly hopeful to our
00:03:58.520
credit. And that isn't to disparage anyone who's made a viable effort to make headway legally,
00:04:04.600
but it's enabled us to get some understanding of where the courts are at right now. And it is a
00:04:10.540
challenging environment. And so out of that, this is what we put forward. And what you're alluding to
00:04:17.160
is what's called inducement. That we, as you said, we've fought hard as employees to have a standing
00:04:24.680
with our companies and an agreement. And listen, at the end of the day, we want the success of the
00:04:29.680
airline industry. We want people to be traveling, not staying in their 15-minute cities or otherwise.
00:04:33.540
We want them moving about the world freely as free citizens. So ultimately, that's what we want.
00:04:39.540
And doing our part to get people safely, as I did with you on that one day, and it was a pleasure
00:04:44.540
to chat with you briefly. We have these agreements. Well, this interim order came in and it induced a
00:04:54.640
breach of that contract. I mean, just as an example, and it's been a beef, at least of mine
00:05:00.280
personally, and I'm sure with a bunch of my other colleagues, is it was stated that we were on a leave
00:05:05.220
of absence? Well, I mean, there's no such thing in any contract I know of an involuntary leave of
00:05:12.240
absence. The aviation industry is prone to all sorts of ups and downs. It trends with the economy
00:05:19.100
or with things like asinine COVID policy, for instance, right? So you've got circumstances where
00:05:24.980
former military guys, let's say, will say, hey, there isn't a lot of work for me here right now,
00:05:30.180
or I may be furloughed. So I'm going to go back to the military, I'll take a leave of absence and
00:05:35.040
I'll go back for two or three years. But there's nothing contractually that says you will involuntarily
00:05:40.920
be put on a leave of absence. So that's just just one example. Well, we've had people suspended,
00:05:46.460
which is a better word for that. It's not actually leave of absence or terminated. So that's
00:05:52.180
that's a simplistic angle. And again, I fly airplanes. I'm not an expert in the law. But
00:05:59.060
that's kind of a 35,000 foot view of what we're looking at here. Let's talk about a little bit
00:06:06.040
here, where the liability lies. I know the proposed suit is against Transport Canada, who issued the
00:06:11.300
mandate. But in your view, were the airlines themselves, you know, winning participants in
00:06:17.120
this? Or were they victims of this? Because I know when it came to the vaccine mandate for
00:06:20.420
passengers, for example, you know, it's Air Canada or WestJet flight attendants that are,
00:06:24.540
you know, demanding you hand over your proof of vaccination, but it's not their fault. They're
00:06:28.680
enforcing a rule that is coming from a government mandate. When this came up, did the airlines push
00:06:34.760
back against the government at all? Or was their view that, you know what, anything that lets us,
00:06:38.640
you know, keep moving on and get the bailout money is fine with us, we're just going to go along with it?
00:06:43.780
Yeah, I mean, you're touching on on a number of pieces that we've been fairly vocal about over the
00:06:48.300
past couple years, I guess, you know, as much as I'll say, they were they were pretty enthusiastic
00:06:54.340
in employing these there. Once we were past that October 29 deadline, when this interim order came
00:07:01.720
out, it was fairly common if you were speaking with a manager and we pushed back hard. I mean,
00:07:06.440
individually, a lot of my courageous colleagues were quite vocal. And of course, the management was
00:07:13.000
was prone to typically say, Hey, you know, what do you want us to do? Well, we've got to run an
00:07:17.140
airline, we're just, we're just, we're doing what we need to do. It's the government's, the
00:07:22.200
government's fault. And there's certainly obviously, this is our point that it was, it was, it was pushed
00:07:27.580
and forced down this road. But even before this, this came out, there was all sorts of things
00:07:32.820
happening within the industry that that seemed fairly enthusiastic. And at the end of the day, I mean,
00:07:37.740
they want to make money. So it's understandable, but we can't live in a society where we just take
00:07:43.520
these, these God given rights and toss them out the window. And then the point being on this end of
00:07:49.220
it, you know, if you want to use an analogy, even with your home life, if somebody comes into your
00:07:54.060
home, a group of people and ransacks it runs down the road with your possessions, you're not typically
00:07:58.540
prone to just sit in your house and shrug and say, Well, at least I still have the four walls to sit
00:08:03.760
within. And that's essentially what's happened. The majority of people have gone back to work,
00:08:08.180
but there's been, there's been no willingness to, to replace the lost income. And it's not just lost
00:08:14.140
income. People, there's intangibles here as well. People lost their marriages, they lost their homes,
00:08:20.320
they lost relationships and all sorts of things directly related to the loss of loss of employment.
00:08:27.040
I'm glad you mentioned that because I think oftentimes people who are disconnected from the
00:08:32.540
situation would say, Okay, yeah, they were suspended for a bit, they got their jobs back,
00:08:37.000
everyone move on. But but it is very difficult to move on when you're one of the people that has just
00:08:41.760
gone through what you've described there, which I don't think is difficult to imagine. And you also
00:08:46.300
look at the the way that it would breed some fairly nasty thinking among colleagues when, you know,
00:08:52.640
all of a sudden you've been outed in, you know, for this one thing, and then you go back and your
00:08:57.020
colleagues probably know why you were gone. And there might be some some discontent there. And,
00:09:01.980
and also just people that were forced out of the industry, which I heard a lot of, you know,
00:09:05.960
people that own businesses that were shut down, that just decided, Okay, maybe there's no point,
00:09:11.100
and I'm going to go and get a job that's not fulfilling, but you know, I could work it. I mean,
00:09:14.620
I know that when I looked at some of the comments that have been made by Free to Fly, people that were
00:09:18.880
wouldn't have retired, they weren't ready to retire, they didn't want to retire. But it was just all
00:09:23.600
right, well, maybe I have a few years left, this is something I'm going to do now. That's not a win.
00:09:27.640
That's not a win. They're still victims of this. No, and I appreciate you bringing that up. It's
00:09:32.040
essentially retirement under duress. And I just put top of my mind, there's like two faces and in my,
00:09:37.160
my brain of guys that I have enormous respect for, that refused to concede. And that's the road they
00:09:42.200
went down. And they made it clear they weren't retiring because it was it was time to hang up the
00:09:46.120
headset, and move move into retirement, it was done because of, because of the the mandate. So, you know,
00:09:54.760
as relates to, to the work environment, I will say for the vast majority of my colleagues, and the
00:10:03.080
flight tech is a fascinating place, you're essentially locked in a closet with somebody
00:10:07.000
for hours and hours at a time, right. So the conversation can be simulating, and it's typically
00:10:12.760
not terribly heated. But I will say when it does kind of come up, and it inevitably does people talk
00:10:18.120
about what you were doing last summer, and it was like, well, working in a little manufacturing
00:10:22.600
plant or whatever, and you'll have a conversation, the majority are incredibly supportive, up to and
00:10:27.800
often including saying, I got so much respect for you. And I did not want to go down this road. And I
00:10:32.600
wish I would have held out myself. There's the odd person that typically just, it's awkward silence
00:10:38.520
for a few seconds, and you talk about something else, right? Because you, you're not going to get into
00:10:42.680
it, you've got another five hours before you get to Seattle or something, right. But for the most part,
00:10:47.800
certainly the the visceral feeling as we as we what, you know, ended up later last year was don't
00:10:55.880
come near me with a booster, amongst the majority of my colleagues.
00:11:00.280
Yeah, and I think that was the turning point for a lot of Canadians when there was that one press
00:11:05.160
conference, I can't remember when it was, it was around the time they had suspended the vaccine
00:11:10.440
mandate, the broad sort of array of them. And you know, the Health Minister Duclos had said something
00:11:16.200
along the lines of, you know, it's just as temporary suspension. And then there was another
00:11:19.720
press conference where they talked about reevaluating their definition of what it meant to be fully
00:11:24.600
vaccinated and re reconstituting that around being up to date. And there were a lot of people that got
00:11:30.680
their two doses, maybe even they got their third dose that were being told by the government that,
00:11:34.760
you know, there could come a time where you're unvaccinated, because we've just changed what it means.
00:11:39.320
And I think a lot of people that were kind of on the cusp, like you've just talked about,
00:11:43.320
really did draw a line in the sand there, or would have had the government really gone ahead
00:11:47.480
with that and said, No, no, no, now you need a booster every three months to be considered
00:11:51.560
fully vaccinated. Because at that point, you are no longer your own individual, insofar as you ever
00:11:58.200
were, you are no longer making your own choices, if your job is contingent on renewing your vaccination
00:12:03.320
status every three, four, six months. And, and I think there was a fear among a lot of people that
00:12:07.560
that that's where we were headed. Well, and I would I remember that distinctly,
00:12:12.200
because because I was actually working in a manufacturing plant at the time. And I took a
00:12:16.360
little break from gluing pieces together to watch that press conference. And I remember thinking,
00:12:22.840
wow, and I would almost suggest it was somewhat of a trial balloon by the government to see what kind of,
00:12:29.160
what kind of feedback they were going to get. And we are living in a little bit of a Truman show,
00:12:33.960
I would say here when it comes to the state as a whole. And, and even with with these mandates
00:12:40.120
themselves, if you look at us here in the aviation sector up in Canada versus in the states,
00:12:45.320
the the troubling reality, and I think this is something everybody needs to take as a takeaway,
00:12:51.240
is collective action matters when it comes to standing up when it matters of conscience. Because
00:12:58.680
at the end of the day, it was somewhat of a cost benefits analysis. And sadly, once we got
00:13:02.760
right down to the wire in that date, it was a fairly small crowd of people across all sorts
00:13:08.840
of industries that were willing to say, I'll give up my job, I'll give up my home, I'll give
00:13:13.000
up whatever it takes, because I'm afraid of the right things down the road, right? Jordan Peterson
00:13:19.560
talks about that, it's not necessarily courage, it's understanding the bigger picture. Whereas in
00:13:24.440
the states, there was a couple airlines where there was enough guys and gals that and I'm not
00:13:29.160
talking 40 50%. It's not a big number. I don't know what it is, let's say it's 10 or 15%. You said
00:13:34.520
don't come near me with that thing or I'm not flying your airplane. And the airline did a cost benefits
00:13:39.480
analysis and thought the airplanes aren't going to move and it's going to fall apart in a hurry.
00:13:43.880
And so as we go forward, this this COVID was it was a season, I'd say we've got very deep seasons of
00:13:50.040
challenge coming up, you speak to them all the time, Andrew, and unless people are willing to stand up,
00:13:56.280
and the biggest of all, in my view, be willing to give things up, give up comfort, give up convenience,
00:14:02.760
give up status quo, give up your reputation, because a lot of us conceded based on what people
00:14:08.280
are going to say about us. And that's a pretty low threshold. But unless we're willing to really do that,
00:14:14.280
we're in for a real, real deepening season of challenge ahead. And I think that's got to be our
00:14:19.880
takeaway as citizens of this once great nation.
00:14:23.080
I'm being told by my producer that the longer you talk, the more our viewership just keeps going
00:14:28.680
up. So what you're saying is resonating with people. And if you're watching live, do share it.
00:14:33.160
And I think what you mentioned there, Greg, is incredibly important in that a lot of the
00:14:36.920
problems that I saw from, well, with the COVID restrictions, of which there are many, is that
00:14:41.720
they were inherently meant to divide and isolate people so that they couldn't do exactly what you
00:14:46.920
just described. I mean, when it was literally illegal to go and have dinner with a neighbor or a
00:14:52.040
friend or a family member, you can't actually sit around a table and talk about why this isn't right
00:14:56.840
and talk about what you're going to do and plan and plot and scheme and all of these things.
00:15:01.160
And I mean that in more of a joking way than isolation, right?
00:15:04.360
Yeah, exactly. And I think the same thing here. I mean, you have pilots and flight attendants and
00:15:08.440
other people in the sector that have very strong unions that we were talking about earlier.
00:15:12.120
And all of a sudden that union is not really standing up in the way that it could.
00:15:16.760
Well, and it was really, they essentially left the room. Let's be honest. I mean, that's what
00:15:24.680
happened. We've got all sorts of things happening in aviation right now. We see WestJet going out on
00:15:30.600
strike. And in some of the unions across the country, like the very next morning, I'm talking
00:15:34.200
within eight hours, had a one or two page statement to all of their thousands of members about how we
00:15:39.160
need to stand in solidarity. And it's a little bit of a thorn in the side of guys and gals who were
00:15:45.800
about to be terminated and termination for a union. It's, it's like thou shalt never go there. I mean,
00:15:51.640
I can give stories of, of pilots that have done pretty rough things over the past 10 or 20 years
00:15:57.560
and the union fought hard to keep them employed. And you've got people for a matter of conscience
00:16:01.640
that's just said, I'm not going to go down this road, not because of myself, but honestly, because
00:16:05.880
I love my kids and my grandkids. And I don't want them to live in a world where the state can do this
00:16:09.720
to us as, as citizens. Uh, and, and the unions were silent. They said nothing. And I'm not talking
00:16:15.400
for a couple of days or weeks. I'm talking, we were going to our union saying, uh, you haven't
00:16:19.880
mentioned us for six months, nine months, we've been out of work and we're going to be terminated
00:16:23.960
in a month. Could you maybe just mention that we are here in the background? Um, it's a little
00:16:29.000
bit hard to, to, to swallow. And I will say, uh, I'm not saying this out of, out of resentment
00:16:35.560
or bitterness, because I think that's a very dark place that, that we can go as well. And you see
00:16:39.640
that in, in, in, uh, I would say the like-minded community a little bit, I think we've got to,
00:16:44.280
we've got to take a deep breath, keep our wits about us, be the adults in the room,
00:16:48.200
uh, see ourselves as leaders, uh, across the nation. What we desperately need right now are
00:16:53.560
men and women of principle who are willing to lead this country back to where it needs to get.
00:16:58.600
And the way to do that again, is to count the cost to say, I'm willing to give things up for the next
00:17:03.880
generation and the generation after that. Because if we don't again, uh, we're in for a dark season
00:17:10.360
here. Seeing the airplane behind you. I think I know the answer to this question, but I do have to
00:17:16.840
ask, why did you even want to go back? I mean, after what happened to you, which I imagine would
00:17:21.960
feel like a tremendous affront to you as an individual that, you know, your, your contributions,
00:17:26.680
your service, your identity didn't matter. Why did you want to go back into that world after?
00:17:31.000
Um, actually it's funny, that picture, I was sitting more like this the other day and I
00:17:35.960
thought that my head's in the clouds. I hadn't really thought of that. I typically sit here
00:17:38.920
when I do interviews, but my daughter painted that for me. It's, it's a favorite, but, um,
00:17:44.440
that's a good question, Andrew. It's not when I get asked normally. So I,
00:17:47.400
you know, I gotta, I gotta take a moment. I, I, I wrestled with it. Um,
00:17:53.240
I wrestled with it a fair bit. I, I guess on some level we fought hard and, and I do,
00:17:59.800
if I'm going to fight for something, I try to think about it fairly carefully.
00:18:03.160
And so if I'm fighting for my job back, it's, it's a, a little bit disingenuous when you get
00:18:07.160
the opportunity to say, no, I'd rather, uh, I'd rather do other things. Um, the vast majority of
00:18:12.840
us got into aviation because for me, when I was 13 years old, my father was a military man. I flew
00:18:17.560
around in a C-130, which I ended up flying myself in the military and I love it. We love the job. Um,
00:18:23.560
it's, it's different every day. It's challenging, you know, insert all of the cliches that you've
00:18:27.240
probably heard before. I don't want to go on and on about it, but it's a fantastic job.
00:18:31.400
Um, it affords all sorts of, uh, perks and otherwise. Um, but at the same time, uh,
00:18:36.920
we did fight to, to, to get our jobs back. Um, the, the job affords, uh, other opportunities.
00:18:44.760
And then part of that is what I'm doing here with you now is advocating for things that,
00:18:48.280
that I'm passionate about. Um, and so that's, that's the long and short of it is, uh, is we
00:18:54.440
fought, we fought long and hard to get here. Uh, I put in a full career in the military before I got to
00:18:59.800
this job and the other blunt, um, honest piece is aviation. Unless you've got some other skill,
00:19:08.280
I didn't work, you know, go to dental school on the side or anything else. It doesn't transpose
00:19:12.200
terribly well to other employment. So I found myself at three o'clock in the morning, uh, shoveling
00:19:17.080
parking lots and things during my, my year out of work. Um, so some of it's just the practicalities
00:19:22.520
of, uh, of getting back to a, to a good job that, uh, that we love. Uh, but it was difficult. Um,
00:19:29.800
but I would say that the moments that I have run across, uh, managers that I have run across other
00:19:34.280
union members, I I've been, I've been meticulous, I believe in being careful with what I say,
00:19:39.880
with being professional and trying to be kind in the way I say it. So I have no shame when I come
00:19:43.480
across these people, I wasn't rude or personally disparaging, but there's times when I, I sense a
00:19:48.600
difficulty, uh, on their part individually with, with our encounters, because I, some of the things
00:19:54.520
that have been written and said, I just scratched my head and I think, yeah, man, you're a smart guy.
00:19:59.400
Uh, but you've kind of hung up your conscience along with common sense in doing this, but people
00:20:05.160
will do strange things sometimes for, uh, for a sizable paycheck. Uh, and then that's part of the
00:20:10.920
problem is the government has got us by the paycheck or got many of us by the paycheck. And we've got to
00:20:15.480
learn, um, a not to get ourselves in so deep that we, we run out of choices, um, and, and to create
00:20:22.200
a life around us where we are able to make some independent choices going forward. And I know a
00:20:26.440
lot of people are doing that as well. Well, I appreciate your, your service and also appreciate
00:20:31.400
your taking a stand in, in this way and joining us today. I've got a fair bit of travel coming up this
00:20:35.960
summer for work, so I'm sure I'll, I'll see you in the skies again. I certainly hope to, but, uh,
00:20:39.800
uh, Greg Hill from Free to Fly Canada. Thank you so much, Greg. Thanks for the opportunity,
00:20:44.280
Andrew. Thanks for listening to the Andrew Lawton Show. Support the program by donating to True
00:20:49.000
North at www.tnc.news.
Link copied!