Poilievre needs a new strategy
Episode Stats
Words per minute
205.00018
Harmful content
Hate speech
4
sentences flagged
Summary
Join us as we discuss a recent clip that went viral among Canadian politicos and commentators, in which a high profile American podcaster called out Pierre Paulyev for not going on more podcasts. We discuss why he should go on more, and why his team is holding him back.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
It's interesting that we're talking about, you know, it's 2025 and you need to take a modern
00:00:06.580
approach. I think so many ways Pierre has done that. And it's interesting because of Trudeau
00:00:10.680
government regulation with regards to news media and how we can operate on social media,
00:00:16.320
Canadian news outlets cannot have a presence on Facebook or Instagram. And I think that Pierre
00:00:21.960
Paulyev used that to his advantage because he didn't have to speak to Canadians through the
00:00:25.740
filter of the media. He could just go out and speak to them directly. And so much of his strategy
00:00:30.520
that really like propelled him to such a large lead in the polls was just him on social media,
00:00:36.120
putting out these really polished documentaries, explaining issues like in a really clear and
00:00:41.000
precise way. And that really helped him. I haven't seen as much of that, but I did want to tie this
00:00:47.020
to a clip that really went viral among Canadian politicos and commentators from last week, a
00:00:54.060
high profile, large audience, American podcaster named Patrick Bette David, criticized Pierre
00:01:00.460
Paulyev and told him that he's made a huge mistake by not going on more podcasts. So not meeting
00:01:05.820
maybe Canadians or young men where they are, which is on these sort of alternative platforms and podcasts
00:01:11.760
where you can just sit down and have a real conversation. I know you guys have both commented
00:01:15.180
on this, but I want to, for our audience, play a bit of the clip and then we can all react to it.
00:01:19.440
Every time we invited Pierre, arrogant, pompous team, the only podcast he ever did is Jordan
00:01:27.440
Peterson. So let me get this straight. You saw Millay win because he went everywhere. You saw
00:01:34.520
Bukele win, he went everywhere. You saw Trump win because he went everywhere. You saw Bobby win
00:01:40.280
because he went everywhere. You saw Vivek become a superstar because he went everywhere. And you
00:01:49.200
He's not wrong, but he, and he mentioned team, right? He said, Pierre's team, that's his handlers that are,
00:01:56.200
And this message is for the YouTube audience. We love the YouTube audience. Everybody, thank you so much for
00:02:01.200
following our content and supporting us at Juno news. I'm going to ask for one thing, please take a second to
00:02:06.200
like this video. Every time someone likes the video, it helps expand our reach. We can reach more like-minded
00:02:12.200
Canadians, Canadians, just like yourself who care about the truth and have a bit of common sense.
00:02:17.200
So like the video, leave us a comment, tell us your favorite part of the show, and don't forget to
00:02:22.200
subscribe to the channel so that you never miss an update. And if you want to watch full episodes of my
00:02:27.200
show, The Candace Malcolm Show, head on over to JunoNews.com. We record the show live every morning
00:02:33.200
at 11 a.m. Eastern time and consider becoming a subscriber. Support independent news, support independent
00:02:38.200
journalism. Thank you so much. Back to the episode.
00:02:41.200
Well, it's interesting because I mean, he did come on to my podcast and like, it took a while for me to
00:02:48.200
to get to him and to convince him to do that. Like I don't have a huge audience like some of those
00:02:53.200
Americans do, but I don't, I don't see why he wouldn't just go out and go on to Joe Rogan, go on
00:02:58.200
to like some of these big podcasts. It was great that he did Jordan Peterson show. And I got, I think,
00:03:03.200
millions of views. So he should do more of that, but he isn't. And I don't know why. I don't know if that's
00:03:09.200
because his team is too cautious and they're blocking him from doing that.
00:03:12.200
The team is just, is risk averse. They, they, they're, they're playing it safe and playing it
00:03:17.200
safe is, is coming in second place. That's really what it's going to come down to.
00:03:21.200
And then they don't control the material and that drives them nuts, right? They want to have the B roll
00:03:26.200
or whatever you call it. And, and, uh, they're afraid. I mean, that was why, that was why Carney
00:03:30.200
didn't want anybody at his event the other day in Calgary is because we're recording. You could see
00:03:36.200
that you can see what they produce during their events and what makes it out in public versus what
00:03:41.200
we produce when we're there. So, um, yeah, 6 million views. I think he got within one day for going on
00:03:47.200
Jordan Peterson. And like, I'll, I'll, I'll say it. I mean, I got 120,000 followers. Clyde has 150,000
00:03:54.200
followers. You got a hundred and probably 300,000 followers, right? I mean, there's a million people
00:03:58.200
that'll, that'll watch the us, uh, if he comes on our show and it's free and it's quick. And if he does
00:04:05.200
a good job, poof. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And that's people have lost the, the, the, the appetite for slogans and,
00:04:14.200
and short form content. People want to see authenticity. And this is what won Donald Trump,
00:04:19.360
won Millet their, their elections. They went out, they were vulnerable, but they were, they were
00:04:24.580
prepared. And we know Pierre comes to the table prepared. He can, he can withstand a three hour
00:04:30.120
interview if it came down to it and, and, and come out on top of that. Now, none of the other candidates
00:04:35.420
can do that. And this is, what's going to win elections in this new thing. Now, what they're trying
00:04:40.420
to do is, is, is get the vote of the liberal Torontonians. This is the strategy. Quit that
00:04:47.000
strategy. Let's talk about getting people who are fence sitters, who haven't voted before,
00:04:51.860
maybe vote occasionally, but they're, they're not going to be too excited when they see Pierre come
00:04:56.320
out and, and give honest long form opinions on things. This is what will get people who haven't
00:05:02.600
voted energized. This could win him the election massively. And I'm talking at a, at a giant margin.
00:05:08.480
This is what people are craving. Where the, the, the lowest voting demographic is the young male.
00:05:14.520
So like, if you wake up the young male as a voter, not as a, not an, you know, like you, it's not
00:05:20.460
enough to just wake them up. You got to get them to vote. Young males don't vote. So get young males
0.88
00:05:25.440
to vote and yeah, go on the podcast here. That would be a, yeah. Well, it's interesting, Clyde, that you
00:05:30.900
mentioned the GTA and the Toronto voter. Cause if we can go back to that map of Canada, the Leger poll,
00:05:36.580
it shows like, it's really unbelievable how this is flipped because I'm telling you like two months
00:05:41.560
ago that that bottom right corner of the series, greater Toronto, like most of those seats were
00:05:45.660
blue, all of the suburbs. Obviously there's still a few downtown writings that will basically always
00:05:49.760
go liberal. But you see that that has now flipped at least according to this poll. And so Pierre's
00:05:56.400
strategy of not trying to upset those voters and not trying to, I guess, alienate them by being too
00:06:02.800
much of a conservative or talking too much about freedom that hasn't worked. Like he's lost his
00:06:07.100
voters anyway, according to this poll. So like I, from my perspective, he has to do something.
00:06:12.800
And I would love to see him go out there and go onto some of these big podcasts, but then you see
00:06:17.760
the pushback that's happening. Like I already saw it when that, uh, Patrick, that David clip was going
00:06:22.960
viral. Uh, some kind of like establishment conservatives, for instance, Jason Kenney, former premier of
00:06:28.300
Alberta came out and said, like, why would Pierre do your show? You platformed Andrew Tate, who is a
00:06:34.180
misogynist and rapist, which is true, but this idea of like guilt by association, like I can't do
00:06:39.320
why are we doing that? Why is the right doing that? I agree. I don't think we should do that. I think you
00:06:45.160
should go to where the audience is. And if young males, like you said, Marty are, are watching these
00:06:50.000
podcasts and that is what helped JD Vance and president Trump had their opinions. They changed people's
00:06:56.440
opinions of them. Then probably I should do the same thing and forget about the risk reverse
00:07:00.840
cancel culture. People that will say like, how dare you go on a platform that had someone else
00:07:04.420
that I don't like. I'll say this to Pierre, right? So you showed that map and that bottom
00:07:08.800
corner, Toronto, right? The five largest companies in Canada are banks. So the five largest companies
00:07:16.180
in Canada are the TD bank, national bank, Toronto dominion, you know, and they're all based out
00:07:20.860
of Toronto and, and, and, and Poiliev is protecting those banks. If he doesn't go after Toronto and
00:07:28.840
those banks are actually one of the biggest targets of Trump's right now. And like, I would,
00:07:34.720
I would take advantage right now. The TD bank got hit with a $3 billion, um, penalty for, uh, money laundering.
00:07:43.780
And, and the president of the TD bank walks away. He just resigns. He, he, his term is a done next
00:07:50.480
week. And so hammer the banks, it sucks, but hammer the banks and hammer Ontario. And then you'll,
00:07:58.280
you will gain so much support in the rest of the country. I mean, the banks used to be actually the
00:08:02.900
number one target of all the politicians in this country. I don't know when they stopped being the
00:08:06.880
targets. Well, I know why, because they're so big and so powerful. So yeah, there's, um, I think we keep
00:08:13.500
coming back to the same, uh, conclusion, the advisors of the conservatives right now, I don't
00:08:20.300
think are doing a very good job of advising Pierre and me are going to get criticized for saying this
00:08:25.500
and probably you, Candace, because speaking the truth, man, I'm not against Pierre. I like Pierre
00:08:30.400
and I want him to get it, but we're criticizing his team and his approach. And we think, we think he
00:08:35.700
might be, uh, we, I think he might miss an open net. Well, something's definitely not working. I mean,
00:08:40.780
the fact that he was so far ahead and he's not, I will point out that the betting markets are still
00:08:45.900
strongly in favor of a conservative winning. So one Leger poll showing the liberals ahead doesn't
00:08:50.520
necessarily mean this is a done deal and that Polyev has lost. Actually, Marty, you posted this on X
00:08:55.760
yesterday. You said that the Poly market is still predicting a big conservative win and you can,
00:09:00.580
you can see it's 78% with the liberal 21 and it hasn't really changed. There isn't, you know,
00:09:05.400
it's a, it's a plateau. So, so Pierre Polyev's odds of becoming prime minister haven't changed,
00:09:10.300
at least in the last, I think this shows just a week. Um, but then Brian Lilly also had a post
00:09:15.340
about the MGM betting markets and the serious odds are still again in favor of the conservatives,
00:09:20.380
almost a one-to-one chance of them winning or one, 1.36 compared to the liberals up at 2.87. So
00:09:28.020
it's not like they've blown it. It's not like they've lost the election. They still have a very,
00:09:31.600
very good chance. There's still the odds to win, but I think that Polyev has to change something
00:09:36.620
because the momentum has shifted and it's going towards Mark Carney and the liberals,
00:09:41.100
uh, probably think. Yeah. Well, I absolutely think that he just needs to go back to what being
00:09:47.320
himself again, it's, it's Pierre Polyev that people like, it's not this, this PR Polyev, this,
00:09:53.780
this, uh, this fake persona. I know he ditched the glasses. He got a new haircut and all of that stuff,
00:09:58.660
whatever you got to do what you got to do, but don't become a different character. It's the new
00:10:03.040
character that people are just not resonating towards, uh, as well as, you know, as the,
00:10:08.640
as the liberals move towards his strategy and, and saying like all the talking points, you know,
00:10:14.340
getting rid of the carbon tax, uh, fiscal conservatism, all of this stuff, own it, own it,
00:10:19.660
come out and tell, tell the public. Yeah, great. You, you're, you're trying to take my ideas.
00:10:23.680
That's fine, but I'll be the one who actually implement them. That's, that's how it's going to
00:10:27.340
come across. And this is what will actually get people to wake up and say, Oh, okay. I, I still
00:10:32.880
like that guy. I still like what he's doing. Uh, step away from this, uh, PR strategy stuff from
00:10:38.080
Ottawa. It's terrible. Well, and the other thing is if the liberals have come towards him in terms
00:10:42.720
of policies like carbon tax, capital gains tax, and some others, I think it creates an opportunity
00:10:47.300
for him to come up with some new strategies, some new, some new policies, sorry, based on his
00:10:51.640
principles of free market. Like, why don't we hear like a huge major tax cut or, you know, some other
00:10:56.460
huge reform that will again, differentiate the liberals from the conservatives. Cause if the liberals
00:11:01.680
want to run as fiscal conservatives, that's great for me. I'm, I'm for that. I'm for everyone being
00:11:05.220
much more conservative. Uh, but then I want to see more from the conservatives, maybe on social
00:11:09.640
issues, maybe on some of the woke things that have kind of gone way too far in Canada. Like
00:11:14.040
let's hear, let's hear different things from Polyev. Um, actually, when you mentioned that,
00:11:19.440
you remind me of another thing I want to point out. The liberals have closed the gap with the
00:11:23.800
conservatives, but it's not that the conservatives dropped is that the liberals went up and the liberals
00:11:28.480
went up in popularity at the expense of the NDP, right? So that's a, that's a really important
00:11:33.280
thing to, to remember the NDP, the NDP, they really blew it. Uh, Jagmeet, you know, stayed way too
00:11:39.040
long. So, um, so the conservatives now strategically, what they need to do is they need to try and find,
00:11:46.320
where are they going to find their votes? They're not going to find too many more. They're, they're,
00:11:49.520
they're at their high percentage. So they need to keep that. Like they didn't lose ground. That's what I'm
00:11:54.240
trying to say. They didn't lose ground. The liberals regained some, uh, maybe, maybe a strategy would be
00:12:00.080
to promote the NDPs. I don't know. And I would like to add too, that the conservatives can come
00:12:04.980
out and talk about, uh, Mark Carney and his fiscal conservatism, the whole, his new new found liking
00:12:10.840
for that. No, he's not going to be fiscally conservative. He doesn't have a track record of
00:12:14.920
it. Marty called him a one trick pony earlier. What was his one trick? He was turning the money
00:12:18.840
printer on. That's what he's done. He did it. He did it with the bank of Canada. He did it with the
00:12:23.160
bank of England. He's largely, I would, I would, I would say that he's largely responsible for the
00:12:28.840
housing bubble in Canada because it's an asset bubble because of interest rates are way too low
00:12:34.400
for way too long. And this is, this is the legacy of Mark Carney. He'll bring on more inflation. He'll
00:12:40.180
bring on more fiscal woes for Canada. And Pierre should really be banking on that.
00:12:46.420
Actually, you know what Pierre should do now? This is a very risky thing, but one thing Pierre should do
00:12:51.040
is have a meeting with Trump. Imagine if Pierre has a meeting with Trump before the election
00:12:56.320
and they're buddy buddies, you know, like Brian Mulroney, Ronald Reagan kind of buddy buddies. Like
00:13:01.260
if Trump met him and everything goes good, then Pierre could eat like, that's the victory I would
00:13:06.460
go after if I was Pierre right now. But that's also risky because you could show up at the white
0.97
00:13:10.960
house and end up having a Zelensky moment. Hopefully not.
00:13:14.000
You know, I, I, I agree with that. I think that Pierre should do that. But my concern,
00:13:20.240
and I think that this would be the concern of the strategists around Polyev, I don't know what
00:13:23.840
Polyev thinks about this, uh, but that it could backfire that the liberals could use that image
00:13:27.820
to say, Polyev, he's just like Trump. And then they would get their wish of running a campaign
0.73
00:13:31.800
against Donald Trump. And it would come back to Canadians, right? Like can Canadians see through
0.99
00:13:36.060
that? How many, what percentage of Canadians have like complete Trump derangement? Like how many of them
00:13:41.800
really drank the Kool-Aid and believe the MSNBC talking points? Because if it's like 20 to 30%
00:13:47.000
of Canadians, then Polyev could do that and he could win. But if it's like 60 or 70% of Canadians
00:13:53.400
that like wake up in fear of Donald Trump and hate him, then Polyev doing that would be a total disaster.
00:13:59.740
Yeah. And on the flip side, I think Carney will avoid it because Carney, Carney will not,
00:14:05.260
Carney's not the kind of guy that Trump likes. Carney, Trump will not like Carney on face value. He
00:14:10.340
doesn't like bankers and snobs and people like that. So, so yeah, maybe let's, let's try and
00:14:17.120
encourage that. Carney, go visit Trump and have your Zelensky moment. I think a lot of the people
00:14:21.700
in Canada that have Trent derangement syndrome at the moment are hardcore liberals anyway, and they're
00:14:26.580
not going to vote conservative regardless. So there's no point of pandering to those individuals.
00:14:30.900
Yeah. They'll, they'll, they'll, they'll squeak loudly, but that you could use that to your
00:14:35.080
advantage. The more unhinged they get, the better the conservatives will look. So I would say,
00:14:40.820
you know, encourage it, make it, make it happen more often because it'll be a winning strategy long
00:14:46.180
term. I, I, I live in an ultra conservative writing and I have weekly book club meetings with my
00:14:53.200
neighbors. And I was surprised at how many of my neighbors don't like Trump. It truly shocked me.
00:14:58.940
And I think what his latest salvo really soured a lot of people. They, they, they probably did
00:15:04.340
like Trump in the, in the beginning, but some people truly don't, you know, or we're shocked
00:15:10.100
by Trump, um, attacking us so viciously in the last little while. Yeah. I can sort of relate to that as
00:15:16.000
well because I, I like Trump and I find him hilarious. I don't think he gets enough credit
00:15:19.820
for just being like entertaining and funny. And I think that the team that he's assembled is really
00:15:24.100
good. I love the make America healthy again movement. And there's so much about it that I really
00:15:27.640
like, but I have not liked this. Like, I don't think that a terror four against your closest friend
00:15:31.400
and ally is a good strategy. I don't think that calling Canada, the 51st state and repeating the
00:15:36.160
governor Trudeau thing, even though it is kind of funny, but it's just so unhelpful to Canadian
00:15:40.400
politics because it has just completely changed the, the entire conversation in Canada. It's
00:15:46.620
frustrating that an external force that we used to think was for good, um, has derailed our politics
00:15:53.140
so much. And finally, the thing I liked about Trump was that I felt like we were going to have a
00:15:56.860
golden age and that it was going to be this like booming economy. We're finally going to get like
00:16:00.420
the roaring twenties that we were waiting for after COVID. And yet, because of this whole tariff
00:16:05.160
thing, I mean, the stock market is just in an absolute free fall and it doesn't really feel like
00:16:09.940
we're like anybody's winning at this point. His own citizens and his own advisors are telling him
00:16:15.160
that, Hey, Donald, like, Whoa, Whoa, Whoa. I mean, you know, yeah, to your point, Candace, I think, uh,
00:16:20.580
last I looked, the American market had lost $4.5 trillion in market cap. That's, that's,
00:16:26.040
that's a big number that, and, and, and Americans checked off Trump mostly for economic reasons
00:16:32.260
here in Canada, we vote for healthcare and, uh, free checks for, for whatever reason, whereas
00:16:37.360
Americans truly vote for the economy. And, uh, yeah, yeah. Trump back off a little bit. Let's hear
00:16:43.940
more from, uh, Robert Kennedy on making, uh, uh, you know, America healthy and let some of the other
00:16:49.780
people talk for a while. Yeah. What do you think Clyde? Well, I'd agree. I would agree with that.
00:16:54.900
I, I, so I think, um, I think Trump's going hard. There's again, there's two sets of tariffs. There's
00:17:00.220
the, there's the punitive ones that are aimed at Canada, fixing Canada and Mexico, fixing their
00:17:05.940
border situation. The, the issues with narcotics in the country, which are real issues. And we're not
00:17:11.740
where the, the numbers, the numbers, the 1% numbers, most people, uh, would dismiss that
00:17:17.880
with the amount that's actually being trafficked in the country. You don't have to look that far
00:17:22.320
to see it. Uh, Sam Cooper has been doing great work on that. The second round of tariffs are
00:17:26.280
reciprocal. And I think that they're fair in, in fact, I think that reciprocal tariffs is what
00:17:31.980
our politicians are talking about against Trump and his tariff runs. I think, uh, if they would
00:17:37.240
just come to the table and, and, and actually negotiate and say, you know, the end goal here
00:17:42.360
is to remove tariffs. That would be a great step in the right direction. Now there are a lot of,
00:17:47.480
uh, you know, cartels and monopolies in Canada that would suffer tremendously to that. But I think
00:17:53.800
it would take some time. Our economy would transition to a more modern economy and we could
00:17:59.540
do really well with the United States as good partners. I think that's the direction that he's
00:18:03.480
trying to go. I think, uh, he's having a hard time with that because there's pushback,
00:18:07.880
but I think that's the goal in the end. Well, absolutely. Thanks so much. We have,
00:18:12.520
uh, Clyde do something and Marty up more. It's always fun to have you gentlemen on the show.
00:18:15.560
Thank you so much for joining us. Cheers, everyone.