ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- March 13, 2025
Poilievre needs a new strategy
Episode Stats
Length
18 minutes
Words per Minute
205.00018
Word Count
3,750
Sentence Count
244
Hate Speech Sentences
4
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
It's interesting that we're talking about, you know, it's 2025 and you need to take a modern
00:00:06.580
approach. I think so many ways Pierre has done that. And it's interesting because of Trudeau
00:00:10.680
government regulation with regards to news media and how we can operate on social media,
00:00:16.320
Canadian news outlets cannot have a presence on Facebook or Instagram. And I think that Pierre
00:00:21.960
Paulyev used that to his advantage because he didn't have to speak to Canadians through the
00:00:25.740
filter of the media. He could just go out and speak to them directly. And so much of his strategy
00:00:30.520
that really like propelled him to such a large lead in the polls was just him on social media,
00:00:36.120
putting out these really polished documentaries, explaining issues like in a really clear and
00:00:41.000
precise way. And that really helped him. I haven't seen as much of that, but I did want to tie this
00:00:47.020
to a clip that really went viral among Canadian politicos and commentators from last week, a
00:00:54.060
high profile, large audience, American podcaster named Patrick Bette David, criticized Pierre
00:01:00.460
Paulyev and told him that he's made a huge mistake by not going on more podcasts. So not meeting
00:01:05.820
maybe Canadians or young men where they are, which is on these sort of alternative platforms and podcasts
00:01:11.760
where you can just sit down and have a real conversation. I know you guys have both commented
00:01:15.180
on this, but I want to, for our audience, play a bit of the clip and then we can all react to it.
00:01:19.440
Every time we invited Pierre, arrogant, pompous team, the only podcast he ever did is Jordan
00:01:27.440
Peterson. So let me get this straight. You saw Millay win because he went everywhere. You saw
00:01:34.520
Bukele win, he went everywhere. You saw Trump win because he went everywhere. You saw Bobby win
00:01:40.280
because he went everywhere. You saw Vivek become a superstar because he went everywhere. And you
00:01:44.200
don't, you deserve losing.
00:01:49.200
He's not wrong, but he, and he mentioned team, right? He said, Pierre's team, that's his handlers that are,
00:01:54.200
that are not adapting.
00:01:56.200
And this message is for the YouTube audience. We love the YouTube audience. Everybody, thank you so much for
00:02:01.200
following our content and supporting us at Juno news. I'm going to ask for one thing, please take a second to
00:02:06.200
like this video. Every time someone likes the video, it helps expand our reach. We can reach more like-minded
00:02:12.200
Canadians, Canadians, just like yourself who care about the truth and have a bit of common sense.
00:02:17.200
So like the video, leave us a comment, tell us your favorite part of the show, and don't forget to
00:02:22.200
subscribe to the channel so that you never miss an update. And if you want to watch full episodes of my
00:02:27.200
show, The Candace Malcolm Show, head on over to JunoNews.com. We record the show live every morning
00:02:33.200
at 11 a.m. Eastern time and consider becoming a subscriber. Support independent news, support independent
00:02:38.200
journalism. Thank you so much. Back to the episode.
00:02:41.200
Well, it's interesting because I mean, he did come on to my podcast and like, it took a while for me to
00:02:48.200
to get to him and to convince him to do that. Like I don't have a huge audience like some of those
00:02:53.200
Americans do, but I don't, I don't see why he wouldn't just go out and go on to Joe Rogan, go on
00:02:58.200
to like some of these big podcasts. It was great that he did Jordan Peterson show. And I got, I think,
00:03:03.200
millions of views. So he should do more of that, but he isn't. And I don't know why. I don't know if that's
00:03:09.200
because his team is too cautious and they're blocking him from doing that.
00:03:12.200
The team is just, is risk averse. They, they, they're, they're playing it safe and playing it
00:03:17.200
safe is, is coming in second place. That's really what it's going to come down to.
00:03:21.200
And then they don't control the material and that drives them nuts, right? They want to have the B roll
00:03:26.200
or whatever you call it. And, and, uh, they're afraid. I mean, that was why, that was why Carney
00:03:30.200
didn't want anybody at his event the other day in Calgary is because we're recording. You could see
00:03:36.200
that you can see what they produce during their events and what makes it out in public versus what
00:03:41.200
we produce when we're there. So, um, yeah, 6 million views. I think he got within one day for going on
00:03:47.200
Jordan Peterson. And like, I'll, I'll, I'll say it. I mean, I got 120,000 followers. Clyde has 150,000
00:03:54.200
followers. You got a hundred and probably 300,000 followers, right? I mean, there's a million people
00:03:58.200
that'll, that'll watch the us, uh, if he comes on our show and it's free and it's quick. And if he does
00:04:05.200
a good job, poof. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And that's people have lost the, the, the, the appetite for slogans and,
00:04:14.200
and short form content. People want to see authenticity. And this is what won Donald Trump,
00:04:19.360
won Millet their, their elections. They went out, they were vulnerable, but they were, they were
00:04:24.580
prepared. And we know Pierre comes to the table prepared. He can, he can withstand a three hour
00:04:30.120
interview if it came down to it and, and, and come out on top of that. Now, none of the other candidates
00:04:35.420
can do that. And this is, what's going to win elections in this new thing. Now, what they're trying
00:04:40.420
to do is, is, is get the vote of the liberal Torontonians. This is the strategy. Quit that
00:04:47.000
strategy. Let's talk about getting people who are fence sitters, who haven't voted before,
00:04:51.860
maybe vote occasionally, but they're, they're not going to be too excited when they see Pierre come
00:04:56.320
out and, and give honest long form opinions on things. This is what will get people who haven't
00:05:02.600
voted energized. This could win him the election massively. And I'm talking at a, at a giant margin.
00:05:08.480
This is what people are craving. Where the, the, the lowest voting demographic is the young male.
00:05:14.520
So like, if you wake up the young male as a voter, not as a, not an, you know, like you, it's not
00:05:20.460
enough to just wake them up. You got to get them to vote. Young males don't vote. So get young males
00:05:25.440
to vote and yeah, go on the podcast here. That would be a, yeah. Well, it's interesting, Clyde, that you
00:05:30.900
mentioned the GTA and the Toronto voter. Cause if we can go back to that map of Canada, the Leger poll,
00:05:36.580
it shows like, it's really unbelievable how this is flipped because I'm telling you like two months
00:05:41.560
ago that that bottom right corner of the series, greater Toronto, like most of those seats were
00:05:45.660
blue, all of the suburbs. Obviously there's still a few downtown writings that will basically always
00:05:49.760
go liberal. But you see that that has now flipped at least according to this poll. And so Pierre's
00:05:56.400
strategy of not trying to upset those voters and not trying to, I guess, alienate them by being too
00:06:02.800
much of a conservative or talking too much about freedom that hasn't worked. Like he's lost his
00:06:07.100
voters anyway, according to this poll. So like I, from my perspective, he has to do something.
00:06:12.800
And I would love to see him go out there and go onto some of these big podcasts, but then you see
00:06:17.760
the pushback that's happening. Like I already saw it when that, uh, Patrick, that David clip was going
00:06:22.960
viral. Uh, some kind of like establishment conservatives, for instance, Jason Kenney, former premier of
00:06:28.300
Alberta came out and said, like, why would Pierre do your show? You platformed Andrew Tate, who is a
00:06:34.180
misogynist and rapist, which is true, but this idea of like guilt by association, like I can't do
00:06:39.320
why are we doing that? Why is the right doing that? I agree. I don't think we should do that. I think you
00:06:45.160
should go to where the audience is. And if young males, like you said, Marty are, are watching these
00:06:50.000
podcasts and that is what helped JD Vance and president Trump had their opinions. They changed people's
00:06:56.440
opinions of them. Then probably I should do the same thing and forget about the risk reverse
00:07:00.840
cancel culture. People that will say like, how dare you go on a platform that had someone else
00:07:04.420
that I don't like. I'll say this to Pierre, right? So you showed that map and that bottom
00:07:08.800
corner, Toronto, right? The five largest companies in Canada are banks. So the five largest companies
00:07:16.180
in Canada are the TD bank, national bank, Toronto dominion, you know, and they're all based out
00:07:20.860
of Toronto and, and, and, and Poiliev is protecting those banks. If he doesn't go after Toronto and
00:07:28.840
those banks are actually one of the biggest targets of Trump's right now. And like, I would,
00:07:34.720
I would take advantage right now. The TD bank got hit with a $3 billion, um, penalty for, uh, money laundering.
00:07:43.780
And, and the president of the TD bank walks away. He just resigns. He, he, his term is a done next
00:07:50.480
week. And so hammer the banks, it sucks, but hammer the banks and hammer Ontario. And then you'll,
00:07:58.280
you will gain so much support in the rest of the country. I mean, the banks used to be actually the
00:08:02.900
number one target of all the politicians in this country. I don't know when they stopped being the
00:08:06.880
targets. Well, I know why, because they're so big and so powerful. So yeah, there's, um, I think we keep
00:08:13.500
coming back to the same, uh, conclusion, the advisors of the conservatives right now, I don't
00:08:20.300
think are doing a very good job of advising Pierre and me are going to get criticized for saying this
00:08:25.500
and probably you, Candace, because speaking the truth, man, I'm not against Pierre. I like Pierre
00:08:30.400
and I want him to get it, but we're criticizing his team and his approach. And we think, we think he
00:08:35.700
might be, uh, we, I think he might miss an open net. Well, something's definitely not working. I mean,
00:08:40.780
the fact that he was so far ahead and he's not, I will point out that the betting markets are still
00:08:45.900
strongly in favor of a conservative winning. So one Leger poll showing the liberals ahead doesn't
00:08:50.520
necessarily mean this is a done deal and that Polyev has lost. Actually, Marty, you posted this on X
00:08:55.760
yesterday. You said that the Poly market is still predicting a big conservative win and you can,
00:09:00.580
you can see it's 78% with the liberal 21 and it hasn't really changed. There isn't, you know,
00:09:05.400
it's a, it's a plateau. So, so Pierre Polyev's odds of becoming prime minister haven't changed,
00:09:10.300
at least in the last, I think this shows just a week. Um, but then Brian Lilly also had a post
00:09:15.340
about the MGM betting markets and the serious odds are still again in favor of the conservatives,
00:09:20.380
almost a one-to-one chance of them winning or one, 1.36 compared to the liberals up at 2.87. So
00:09:28.020
it's not like they've blown it. It's not like they've lost the election. They still have a very,
00:09:31.600
very good chance. There's still the odds to win, but I think that Polyev has to change something
00:09:36.620
because the momentum has shifted and it's going towards Mark Carney and the liberals,
00:09:41.100
uh, probably think. Yeah. Well, I absolutely think that he just needs to go back to what being
00:09:47.320
himself again, it's, it's Pierre Polyev that people like, it's not this, this PR Polyev, this,
00:09:53.780
this, uh, this fake persona. I know he ditched the glasses. He got a new haircut and all of that stuff,
00:09:58.660
whatever you got to do what you got to do, but don't become a different character. It's the new
00:10:03.040
character that people are just not resonating towards, uh, as well as, you know, as the,
00:10:08.640
as the liberals move towards his strategy and, and saying like all the talking points, you know,
00:10:14.340
getting rid of the carbon tax, uh, fiscal conservatism, all of this stuff, own it, own it,
00:10:19.660
come out and tell, tell the public. Yeah, great. You, you're, you're trying to take my ideas.
00:10:23.680
That's fine, but I'll be the one who actually implement them. That's, that's how it's going to
00:10:27.340
come across. And this is what will actually get people to wake up and say, Oh, okay. I, I still
00:10:32.880
like that guy. I still like what he's doing. Uh, step away from this, uh, PR strategy stuff from
00:10:38.080
Ottawa. It's terrible. Well, and the other thing is if the liberals have come towards him in terms
00:10:42.720
of policies like carbon tax, capital gains tax, and some others, I think it creates an opportunity
00:10:47.300
for him to come up with some new strategies, some new, some new policies, sorry, based on his
00:10:51.640
principles of free market. Like, why don't we hear like a huge major tax cut or, you know, some other
00:10:56.460
huge reform that will again, differentiate the liberals from the conservatives. Cause if the liberals
00:11:01.680
want to run as fiscal conservatives, that's great for me. I'm, I'm for that. I'm for everyone being
00:11:05.220
much more conservative. Uh, but then I want to see more from the conservatives, maybe on social
00:11:09.640
issues, maybe on some of the woke things that have kind of gone way too far in Canada. Like
00:11:14.040
let's hear, let's hear different things from Polyev. Um, actually, when you mentioned that,
00:11:19.440
you remind me of another thing I want to point out. The liberals have closed the gap with the
00:11:23.800
conservatives, but it's not that the conservatives dropped is that the liberals went up and the liberals
00:11:28.480
went up in popularity at the expense of the NDP, right? So that's a, that's a really important
00:11:33.280
thing to, to remember the NDP, the NDP, they really blew it. Uh, Jagmeet, you know, stayed way too
00:11:39.040
long. So, um, so the conservatives now strategically, what they need to do is they need to try and find,
00:11:46.320
where are they going to find their votes? They're not going to find too many more. They're, they're,
00:11:49.520
they're at their high percentage. So they need to keep that. Like they didn't lose ground. That's what I'm
00:11:54.240
trying to say. They didn't lose ground. The liberals regained some, uh, maybe, maybe a strategy would be
00:12:00.080
to promote the NDPs. I don't know. And I would like to add too, that the conservatives can come
00:12:04.980
out and talk about, uh, Mark Carney and his fiscal conservatism, the whole, his new new found liking
00:12:10.840
for that. No, he's not going to be fiscally conservative. He doesn't have a track record of
00:12:14.920
it. Marty called him a one trick pony earlier. What was his one trick? He was turning the money
00:12:18.840
printer on. That's what he's done. He did it. He did it with the bank of Canada. He did it with the
00:12:23.160
bank of England. He's largely, I would, I would, I would say that he's largely responsible for the
00:12:28.840
housing bubble in Canada because it's an asset bubble because of interest rates are way too low
00:12:34.400
for way too long. And this is, this is the legacy of Mark Carney. He'll bring on more inflation. He'll
00:12:40.180
bring on more fiscal woes for Canada. And Pierre should really be banking on that.
00:12:46.420
Actually, you know what Pierre should do now? This is a very risky thing, but one thing Pierre should do
00:12:51.040
is have a meeting with Trump. Imagine if Pierre has a meeting with Trump before the election
00:12:56.320
and they're buddy buddies, you know, like Brian Mulroney, Ronald Reagan kind of buddy buddies. Like
00:13:01.260
if Trump met him and everything goes good, then Pierre could eat like, that's the victory I would
00:13:06.460
go after if I was Pierre right now. But that's also risky because you could show up at the white
00:13:10.960
house and end up having a Zelensky moment. Hopefully not.
00:13:14.000
You know, I, I, I agree with that. I think that Pierre should do that. But my concern,
00:13:20.240
and I think that this would be the concern of the strategists around Polyev, I don't know what
00:13:23.840
Polyev thinks about this, uh, but that it could backfire that the liberals could use that image
00:13:27.820
to say, Polyev, he's just like Trump. And then they would get their wish of running a campaign
00:13:31.800
against Donald Trump. And it would come back to Canadians, right? Like can Canadians see through
00:13:36.060
that? How many, what percentage of Canadians have like complete Trump derangement? Like how many of them
00:13:41.800
really drank the Kool-Aid and believe the MSNBC talking points? Because if it's like 20 to 30%
00:13:47.000
of Canadians, then Polyev could do that and he could win. But if it's like 60 or 70% of Canadians
00:13:53.400
that like wake up in fear of Donald Trump and hate him, then Polyev doing that would be a total disaster.
00:13:59.740
Yeah. And on the flip side, I think Carney will avoid it because Carney, Carney will not,
00:14:05.260
Carney's not the kind of guy that Trump likes. Carney, Trump will not like Carney on face value. He
00:14:10.340
doesn't like bankers and snobs and people like that. So, so yeah, maybe let's, let's try and
00:14:17.120
encourage that. Carney, go visit Trump and have your Zelensky moment. I think a lot of the people
00:14:21.700
in Canada that have Trent derangement syndrome at the moment are hardcore liberals anyway, and they're
00:14:26.580
not going to vote conservative regardless. So there's no point of pandering to those individuals.
00:14:30.900
Yeah. They'll, they'll, they'll, they'll squeak loudly, but that you could use that to your
00:14:35.080
advantage. The more unhinged they get, the better the conservatives will look. So I would say,
00:14:40.820
you know, encourage it, make it, make it happen more often because it'll be a winning strategy long
00:14:46.180
term. I, I, I live in an ultra conservative writing and I have weekly book club meetings with my
00:14:53.200
neighbors. And I was surprised at how many of my neighbors don't like Trump. It truly shocked me.
00:14:58.940
And I think what his latest salvo really soured a lot of people. They, they, they probably did
00:15:04.340
like Trump in the, in the beginning, but some people truly don't, you know, or we're shocked
00:15:10.100
by Trump, um, attacking us so viciously in the last little while. Yeah. I can sort of relate to that as
00:15:16.000
well because I, I like Trump and I find him hilarious. I don't think he gets enough credit
00:15:19.820
for just being like entertaining and funny. And I think that the team that he's assembled is really
00:15:24.100
good. I love the make America healthy again movement. And there's so much about it that I really
00:15:27.640
like, but I have not liked this. Like, I don't think that a terror four against your closest friend
00:15:31.400
and ally is a good strategy. I don't think that calling Canada, the 51st state and repeating the
00:15:36.160
governor Trudeau thing, even though it is kind of funny, but it's just so unhelpful to Canadian
00:15:40.400
politics because it has just completely changed the, the entire conversation in Canada. It's
00:15:46.620
frustrating that an external force that we used to think was for good, um, has derailed our politics
00:15:53.140
so much. And finally, the thing I liked about Trump was that I felt like we were going to have a
00:15:56.860
golden age and that it was going to be this like booming economy. We're finally going to get like
00:16:00.420
the roaring twenties that we were waiting for after COVID. And yet, because of this whole tariff
00:16:05.160
thing, I mean, the stock market is just in an absolute free fall and it doesn't really feel like
00:16:09.940
we're like anybody's winning at this point. His own citizens and his own advisors are telling him
00:16:15.160
that, Hey, Donald, like, Whoa, Whoa, Whoa. I mean, you know, yeah, to your point, Candace, I think, uh,
00:16:20.580
last I looked, the American market had lost $4.5 trillion in market cap. That's, that's,
00:16:26.040
that's a big number that, and, and, and Americans checked off Trump mostly for economic reasons
00:16:32.260
here in Canada, we vote for healthcare and, uh, free checks for, for whatever reason, whereas
00:16:37.360
Americans truly vote for the economy. And, uh, yeah, yeah. Trump back off a little bit. Let's hear
00:16:43.940
more from, uh, Robert Kennedy on making, uh, uh, you know, America healthy and let some of the other
00:16:49.780
people talk for a while. Yeah. What do you think Clyde? Well, I'd agree. I would agree with that.
00:16:54.900
I, I, so I think, um, I think Trump's going hard. There's again, there's two sets of tariffs. There's
00:17:00.220
the, there's the punitive ones that are aimed at Canada, fixing Canada and Mexico, fixing their
00:17:05.940
border situation. The, the issues with narcotics in the country, which are real issues. And we're not
00:17:11.740
where the, the numbers, the numbers, the 1% numbers, most people, uh, would dismiss that
00:17:17.880
with the amount that's actually being trafficked in the country. You don't have to look that far
00:17:22.320
to see it. Uh, Sam Cooper has been doing great work on that. The second round of tariffs are
00:17:26.280
reciprocal. And I think that they're fair in, in fact, I think that reciprocal tariffs is what
00:17:31.980
our politicians are talking about against Trump and his tariff runs. I think, uh, if they would
00:17:37.240
just come to the table and, and, and actually negotiate and say, you know, the end goal here
00:17:42.360
is to remove tariffs. That would be a great step in the right direction. Now there are a lot of,
00:17:47.480
uh, you know, cartels and monopolies in Canada that would suffer tremendously to that. But I think
00:17:53.800
it would take some time. Our economy would transition to a more modern economy and we could
00:17:59.540
do really well with the United States as good partners. I think that's the direction that he's
00:18:03.480
trying to go. I think, uh, he's having a hard time with that because there's pushback,
00:18:07.880
but I think that's the goal in the end. Well, absolutely. Thanks so much. We have,
00:18:12.520
uh, Clyde do something and Marty up more. It's always fun to have you gentlemen on the show.
00:18:15.560
Thank you so much for joining us. Cheers, everyone.
Link copied!