Juno News - President Trump SLAMS Pierre Poilievre

00:00:00.000 Hi and welcome to The Candace Malcolm Show. I'm your host, Candace Malcolm. Happy Friday,

00:00:11.740 everyone. We have a great show lined up for you today. We're going to talk about the Ontario

00:00:16.660 election. Pretty unsurprising, pretty predictable outcome there. Doug Ford gets his third straight

00:00:22.540 majority. There is an interesting sort of glimmer of hope and a good story that I want to talk

00:00:26.840 about with an independent MP who managed to win big. Her name is Bobbi Ann Brady. We're going to

00:00:32.200 talk about that. We're going to talk about Mark Carney and the polls, a little bit about Trump

00:00:36.480 and whether or not we're getting tariffs on March 4th or not. But first, I want to talk about this

00:00:41.060 big breaking news story that is just being released right now. Donald Trump did a sit-down

00:00:46.560 interview with a UK publication called The Spectator. The host of the show is an individual

00:00:52.360 named Ben Dominic. He's actually an American journalist. They did a sit down interview

00:00:57.240 and the topic of Canada came up. The topic of Pierre Polyev came up. We haven't heard very much

00:01:03.380 on Donald Trump, on what he thinks of Pierre Polyev, what he thinks of the conservative leader

00:01:07.860 here in Canada. And he sort of gave his first opinion, gave his first bit of information about

00:01:14.300 Pierre Polyev. It wasn't very positive. I'm going to read the transcript. There's no video yet,

00:01:18.800 I'll read the transcript and get a little bit of analysis on it.

00:01:22.460 I'm pleased today to be joined on the show by some of my favorite online activists and

00:01:26.920 independent citizen journalists.

00:01:28.960 I'm talking about Brett Sears, an individual named Kevin, who runs a popular X account,

00:01:34.580 Government X is Corrupt.

00:01:36.640 So Brett Sears is an independent researcher and citizen journalist.

00:01:39.540 And then Kevin, like I said, runs an account dedicated to exposing government corruption

00:01:44.400 and legacy media bias.

00:01:45.940 Gentlemen, thank you so much for joining the program today.

00:01:48.800 Thanks for having us on.

00:01:50.500 Great.

00:01:51.000 Okay.

00:01:51.320 So I want to get right to this.

00:01:53.540 Donald Trump, in his own words, on Pierre Polyev.

00:01:56.640 So like I said, the piece is for The Spectator, which is an American publication, and the

00:02:01.880 interviewer is an individual named Ben Dominic.

00:02:04.700 He is the editor of The Spectator magazine, and he had a sit-down interview in the Oval

00:02:13.920 Office with Donald Trump.

00:02:14.980 This just came out moments ago, folks.

00:02:16.900 So basically, they were talking about Kurt Steimer, the British Prime Minister, who was in the White House, who was visiting with Trump and his cabinet yesterday.

00:02:24.380 They were talking about that. And then the conversation pivoted over to Chrystia Freeland in Canada. 0.86

00:02:29.620 So basically, the interviewer, Ben, says this is the attitude of some of these other left of centre politicians, Chrystia Freeland up in Canada, who is doing a debate.

00:02:39.980 She's trying to lead the Liberal Party up there now into this election, and she says there needs

00:02:44.740 to be a nuclear alliance with other European nations and Japan against the United States

00:02:49.860 because you're predatory, talking to Donald Trump. Trump replies, yes, she's terrible. I'll tell you 0.89

00:02:55.360 what, I know her very well. She's absolutely terrible for the country. She's incompetent 1.00

00:03:00.040 in many respects and could only cause ill will for Canada. In fact, Governor Trudeau understood 0.89

00:03:05.880 that. I call him governor. Governor Trudeau understood that. And he actually fired her

00:03:10.740 because of a meeting he had with me. Interesting tidbit there. So Donald Trump is claiming

00:03:15.320 responsibility for Chrysia Freeland getting thrown under the bus and kicked out of Trudeau's

00:03:21.200 cabinet. And remember that she resigned a few days later. Let me just continue in this transcript.

00:03:26.100 He said, I said, she's so bad. She's bad for the country. You know, if I were talented, 0.77

00:03:31.540 I know people that are sort of bad people, but they do a good job running for the country.

00:03:36.380 And he's saying that she's not one of those people.

00:03:38.520 Who's going to get the nomination, do you think, he asks.

00:03:41.200 The interviewer, Ben, says, I don't know. 0.54

00:03:43.100 After the debate, they seemed, well, she's the nuttiest, but they all seem pretty nutty to me.

00:03:47.260 I have to agree with that. 0.96

00:03:48.760 All four of the Liberal candidates seem pretty nutty to me. 0.98

00:03:51.320 Trump comes back and says, she's a whack. 0.88

00:03:53.740 Then Ben, the interviewer, says, the Conservatives obviously have taken a bit of a hit in the polls

00:03:58.320 since some of your comments that you've made about the liberals that they've leaned into?

00:04:03.860 Do you think they're going to be able to pull it out up there? Interesting that he asked this

00:04:09.480 question because, yes, every time Trump talks about the 51st state, the liberals go up in the

00:04:14.820 polls. And so if I were Donald Trump or if I was advising Donald Trump, I'd still just knock it

00:04:18.920 off, cut it out, stop saying that because you're actually having a negative impact in the polls

00:04:23.440 and possibly in the election. Up north, just a final bit here. So then this is where they start

00:04:28.020 talking about Pierre Polyev. So Trump says, well, I think his biggest problem is that he's not a

00:04:34.240 MAGA guy, you know? I mean, he's not really. He's not a Trump guy at all. And then the interviewer

00:04:40.580 comes back and says he's more of a throwback Republican. Trump says he's different. He's

00:04:45.920 making a big mistake. They all make that mistake. You know, they think they're going to be the tough

00:04:50.800 guy. They're going to knock out Trump and they end up getting the hell beat out of him. So I don't

00:04:56.240 know. I mean, I can't tell you, Pierre. I just don't know. I don't like what he's saying about

00:05:00.860 me. It's not positive about me. And we've done a great job. And then Trump goes on to talk about

00:05:05.920 how he had the biggest comeback in American history with winning the election in 2024. So

00:05:11.400 not a very positive explanation or very kind words for Pierre Polyev. Brett, I don't know

00:05:19.220 if you've heard this before, if this is the first you're hearing of it, but what's your reaction to

00:05:23.000 this. Yeah, I mean, excuse me, this is absolutely the first I've heard of it just moments before we

00:05:28.520 came on here. And I like for me, I've been a kind of a Trump supporter ever since he began back in

00:05:36.340 like when he went back in 2016. And, you know, I wasn't as surprised as a lot of people that he

00:05:43.840 actually won that election. I liked a lot of things that he that he was saying, and it resonated

00:05:49.100 with me and i think it resonated with a lot of americans despite um you know everybody being

00:05:54.980 called racist and whatever all the uh attacks so uh when when uh poliev uh came out and

00:06:05.140 like trump started talking about tariffs and all this and and kind of all canadian politicians

00:06:11.740 want to want to do the dollar for dollar hit back we're gonna we're gonna hurt the americans just

00:06:17.140 become the same way that they're going to hurt us. And I was hoping that Pierre Polyev would take

00:06:24.340 the position, well, I'm going to, instead of fighting back, I'm going to try to work with

00:06:28.760 Trump, right, on this. And I thought that would have been a better strategy. He didn't do that.

00:06:33.420 He basically took the same position as Trudeau and Singh and, you know, all of our premiers,

00:06:41.060 maybe a little bit other than Danielle Smith, who seemed a little bit more keen on trying to

00:06:46.740 work with Trump. So, you know, I had thought, because Poliev had been asked many times by

00:06:55.320 reporters, have you spoken with Trump yet? And his answer always was that it wasn't appropriate

00:07:00.840 because he wasn't prime minister. And that's basically all he had to say about that. I think

00:07:05.420 a better strategy for him would have been to reach out. And I think that Trump would have spoken to

00:07:09.700 him and they could have, you know, talked a little bit on how to avoid these tariffs or how to

00:07:15.660 get a little bit of support for Trump, you know, of course, that would come with attacks from the

00:07:23.140 liberal media. Well, I was going to say, like, I think that that might be a strategy that would

00:07:27.820 be best for the country, because I can picture a world where Trump and Poliev could strike a

00:07:33.120 better deal, could work together, could be partners, could deepen the relationship,

00:07:36.300 make it better for everybody. But Poliev has to get elected first. And I think that there is

00:07:41.400 something in the minds of Canadians that when they see Donald Trump and when they hear them,

00:07:45.660 he's they're just repulsed so kevin i'll bring you in on this from a strategy perspective can pierre

00:07:52.220 have a relationship with trump or is it better for him to to have this like feud lean into it maybe

00:07:58.620 and uh punch back at trump himself well personally if if i were running the the polyev campaign um i

00:08:05.820 would do a lot of things differently than he's done over the years uh first thing is to stop you know

00:08:10.780 posting about ukraine stop posting about financial aid to ukraine full stop on that

00:08:15.740 his supporters don't like it every time he does he gets major kickback uh in the threads in in

00:08:20.940 the comment section he should stop doing that immediately that's not a good position especially

00:08:25.660 if you're trying to promote canada first and then you're talking about ukraine uh second thing with

00:08:30.460 you know in terms of donald trump you know they're claiming that this is you know some type of you

00:08:34.220 know you know this is christopher freeland's words not um appear probably as but christopher

00:08:38.700 freelance say it's you know it's economic warfare so fine let's call it economic warfare

00:08:42.940 uh because they're trying to attack our economy which would lead to the 25 tariff although it's

00:08:49.020 not going to be paid uh directly through taxation by canadians it's going to have a negative economic

00:08:54.860 impact you know job losses the goal is for donald trump to attack attract people uh to do business

00:09:01.020 in the united states that means it would be taken from countries like canada so in order to offset

00:09:06.940 that you also have to take a look at our governments have been you know engaging in

00:09:10.460 economic warfare on the on on the canadian people on our businesses for for years you can easily

00:09:16.700 offset any economic um you know um down like attack on the united states by you know easing

00:09:24.460 the rope up here you know massive cuts to business taxes massive cuts to personal income taxes um and

00:09:30.780 actually promote a business friendly environment to be honest with you canada is a very hostile

00:09:35.820 environment to do business in anybody who's run a business would understand this you know anybody

00:09:40.140 who's employed people understands the you know just how difficult it is and how much bureaucracy

00:09:45.260 there is so it would be very easy to offset any economic damage that the united states you know

00:09:50.780 tries to inflict on us uh by you know substantial reduction in taxation bureaucracy uh which would

00:09:57.740 promote businesses to maybe okay now i might not want to move to the united states because you know

00:10:03.900 it's a little bit cheaper to do business here uh it's a it's it's easier to hire and fire employees

00:10:09.340 um and i don't have to deal with the cost of relocating to the united states anymore so that

00:10:13.820 would be the approach to to uh to to take and not to you know fire back with dollar for dollar

00:10:19.500 tariffs because now we're going to have the negative implications from the united states

00:10:23.500 as well as more taxation on canadians because we're the ones that are going to be paying that

00:10:27.900 25 percent import uh tariff i think i think what you're saying is right like in the long term and

00:10:33.820 and it's weird there's almost like a consensus now among all of the political leaders that yes we

00:10:39.180 need to be more competitive for business we need to have pipelines built we need to reduce

00:10:42.620 inter-provincial trade barriers and you know we need to make canada more of a business friendly

00:10:48.780 environment to me those are all like long-term strategies to improve our economy but they don't

00:10:53.660 necessarily deal with like the elephant in the room which is trump it's like how do we talk to

00:10:59.820 this guy how do we negotiate with him i mean just the latest example is tariffs so yesterday we

00:11:04.460 heard from trump that the tariffs weren't going to go into effect until april 2nd he didn't want

00:11:08.700 to do it on april 1st because he's superstitious so let's do it on april 2nd and then later in

00:11:13.420 the day he said no no uh the the tariffs are actually coming in as we said on march 4th let

00:11:19.900 let me just play that clip. Oh, sorry. It's a Truth Social post. So on Truth Social, let me

00:11:26.080 read from it. He said, drugs are still pouring into our country from Mexico and Canada at very

00:11:31.120 high and unacceptable levels. A large percentage of these drugs, much in the form of fentanyl,

00:11:35.340 are made in or supplied by China. More than 100,000 people have died. He goes on. And then

00:11:41.220 he basically just says near the end, the proposed tariffs scheduled to go into effect March 4th

00:11:47.100 will indeed go into effect as scheduled so like there's more to that as well though read the rest

00:11:54.260 because after that he says there could be additional taxes depending on on that as

00:11:59.240 scheduled he says uh china will likely be charged an initial 10 tariff on that date the april 2nd

00:12:05.560 reciprocal tariff date will remain in full force you're right brett so he's saying that there's

00:12:10.200 going to be two rounds of tariffs uh i suppose one is a penalty for fentanyls and the fentanyl

00:12:18.220 and the drug flowing across the border and then the second one is is more to do with um poor trade

00:12:24.600 practices and so it seems like if uh you know if if we're saying okay well now we're going to match

00:12:30.900 dollar for dollar then this then he's saying well now i'm going to put additional tariffs

00:12:35.320 to me that's how i read it yeah right no you're right and so like how can how can like if for

00:12:43.120 someone like pierre polyev i think it's not a bad thing politically that trump is saying that he's

00:12:48.520 not a mega guy he's not coming and basically kissing the ring he doesn't like trump he doesn't

00:12:53.260 say good things about trump like that's not a bad thing politically for polyev but there is a deeper

00:12:58.320 problem here which is that someone has to stand up and negotiate a deal with trump someone needs

00:13:04.140 to step up and say look it might not be very popular for me to go down and speak to him but

00:13:08.460 i have to for for canadians and i just i don't see that happening i think that there's too much

00:13:12.640 political gain for all the parties for polyev for mark carney for i mean christia freeland is kind

00:13:18.240 of not not a relevant figure right now because i don't think she has a chance of winning but

00:13:22.160 you know in order to win an election the canadian people want to see you being tough and and strong

00:13:27.440 against trump not making any kind of concessions and certainly not having any kind of a friendship

00:13:31.240 What do you think, Brett? Well, personally, I mean, I'm Canadian. I would rather him have a

00:13:38.200 friendship with Trump. But I and also I think that, you know, the whoever is going to be the

00:13:48.280 next prime minister, really, whoever leads the Liberal Party has already taken this combative

00:13:53.940 approach against Trump. And, you know, I don't think that necessarily going for those voters who

00:14:01.040 are going to vote for for liberals anyway uh is really a good strategy you see it in the polls

00:14:08.880 already it's like okay well trudeau's gone people didn't like trudeau conservatives gained on that

00:14:13.920 polyev gained on that but it was more of a backlash against trudeau and now that someone

00:14:21.520 else is going to to be the leader um probably mark carney uh you know he's going to get all those

00:14:28.720 voters back. And I think that it's more important for the Conservatives, for Poliak to take a

00:14:37.000 different approach than the Liberals do with their really combative stance.

00:14:43.100 I don't disagree. I just don't, like, given the flip that we've seen in the polls,

00:14:48.860 Sean, if we can just show this graph showing the change in the polls over the last four years. I

00:14:54.340 I mean, this is just one of the most incredible things.

00:14:56.820 So going back basically four years, the Conservatives have held this really strong lead.

00:15:02.980 And then you can just see the line where Justin Trudeau resigns.

00:15:06.960 And the more Canadians learn about Mark Carney, it seems the more they like him.

00:15:11.740 That complete reversal in such a short period of time, to me, has everything to do with President Trump

00:15:18.740 and with Canadians feeling uneasy and insecure

00:15:22.640 and wanting someone who's going to stand up like,

00:15:25.600 like the Liberals are the party of anti-Americanism.

00:15:27.760 I don't endorse that.

00:15:28.620 I don't like that.

00:15:29.200 I'm pro-American.

00:15:30.020 I like America.

00:15:30.820 I think Canada should have a closer union

00:15:32.440 and a deeper friendship and more economic integration.

00:15:36.180 Obviously, I still think Canada

00:15:37.380 should be an independent country,

00:15:38.560 but I think that there should be a strong relationship.

00:15:40.820 But I don't think I'm,

00:15:42.120 I think I'm an outlier in Canada on this.

00:15:44.440 I think that most Canadians don't feel that way.

00:15:47.560 I mean, you can see it in the polls,

00:15:48.740 that they don't like what Trump is saying and Trump is pushing Canadians back into the arms

00:15:53.920 of the Liberals and it's terrifying. Kevin what do you think? Yeah like you know back in in December

00:16:00.780 I think it was like December 30th there was a poll put out by I think it was Angus Reid

00:16:05.480 and you know the Liberals were at you know all-time lows in terms of support historic lows

00:16:11.320 you know the lowest point of support that the party has had in its 150 some odd year history

00:16:18.100 So it just makes me from watching the markets, the stock markets and whatnot, it's called a relief rally, right?

00:16:26.400 So this support that you're seeing, this rise in support, it's just a classic bounce back off of historic lows. 0.94

00:16:34.500 And, you know, it was driven primarily by fear through the media and through the government and changing the ballot box question from, you know, axe the tax and Justin Trudeau sucks to, oh, my God, you know, Trump is going to destroy us all.

00:16:54.800 And we know that, you know, the Canadian, the average Canadian mind is very easily manipulated, you know, with a relatively, you know, in a relatively short time.

00:17:06.480 I mean, just look at how people reacted to the, you know, so-called dangers of COVID.

00:17:12.420 You know, 80 percent of the people were, if not more, were masking up all of through this, you know, fear driven, you know, media event.

00:17:20.480 And it's the same type of tactic that the media is using on Donald Trump.

00:17:27.320 It's, you know, basically what they're doing is engaging, in my opinion, you can probably see a different opinion,

00:17:35.100 but in my opinion, they're engaging in psychological warfare on the Canadian people in order to, you know,

00:17:42.940 in order to drive their polls to the upside because the only winners of of this you know

00:17:49.820 strategy that the media is playing is the liberal party that's they're the only liberals they're the

00:17:55.100 only winners because that is how they govern they govern through fear they govern through crisis

00:18:00.460 uh you know manufactured crisis or not and you know over the last nine or ten years how many

00:18:05.580 crises have we been through uh under this liberal party you know the pandemic the the the uh climate

00:18:11.180 crisis and now you know economic crisis with with donald trump and every time they declare

00:18:16.060 a new you know so-called crisis uh you know their polling numbers get better you're right and uh

00:18:21.100 mark carney said this in the debate he said that we're facing a bigger crisis than covid then the

00:18:25.900 financial crisis of 2008 and mark carney is the only one apparently that can get us through the

00:18:30.940 crisis so just a follow-up for you kevin do you believe the polls when you see these polls that

00:18:35.820 show the the recent one from ipsos which is a very reputable pollster you know there's there's frank

00:18:40.620 graves and ecos he was the first one to say that the liberals are catching up he he's sort of seen

00:18:45.740 not as legitimately um as a pollster he's more of a partisan liberal and sometimes he's been wrong

00:18:51.100 whereas ipsos isn't like that and now it seems that the the critical mass of pollsters are are

00:18:56.860 showing you know the ipsos poll story earlier this week showed that the liberals are up two points

00:19:00.700 that they're at 38 the conservatives nationally are pulling at 36. that's not good news for

00:19:07.260 poliev and his team is it is it real though or or is is the media sort of somehow manipulating this

00:19:13.580 to convince canadians that mark carney is the front runner and he is the sort of

00:19:17.580 you know the the front runner to be the prime minister when the election well when i look at

00:19:22.460 polls right like the ipsos poll that you show or you know the countless other polls i don't look

00:19:26.940 at the percentage in numbers but i look at the the change in percentage over a period of time

00:19:31.820 on their own polls so you know everybody's coming out and saying oh you know the polls are fake now

00:19:36.140 But a year ago or two years ago, when they were showing the Conservatives were, you know, a big league, nobody was saying the polls were fake, right?

00:19:43.340 So if you compare the polls to themselves over time, and then you can compare the rise and the fall instead of the actual percentage versus one party to another, then you can get a good idea.

00:19:54.300 So we don't know what their support is, but we know that there is definitely a change in trend and there is a move away from the Conservative Party to the Liberal Party and from the NDP to the Liberal Party.

00:20:09.140 Because I think, you know, this one thing, you know, realized he qualified for his pension, his his primary goal now is to, you know, it seems to be to get the liberals reelected.

00:20:20.060 And he can only do that by tanking his own party, which he's, you know, quite capable of doing.

00:20:26.220 So, you know, it's it's from both sides. And if you look at, you know, historically speaking, the conservatives were way higher than than their polling averages, historic polling averages.

00:20:37.800 So, you know, the people that they gained over the two, three years or whatnot since the last election that, you know, people were unhappy with with Justin Trudeau and just gravitated towards the Conservative Party, like Brett said earlier, are just, you know, are just going back.

00:20:55.140 And if you look at the demographics, you know, mostly is in Ontario and it's, you know, my family, you know, my parents, you know, the older generation, you know, they're lifelong liberals and they were, you know, gravitating towards the Conservative Party and now they're back to the liberals.

00:21:13.280 So it's, you know, the older generations that, you know, primarily get their news from, you know, CTV, CBC, you know, whatever you want to call it, that are actually buying into this fear.

00:21:25.720 And it's like a feedback loop, right?

00:21:28.060 Like you throw out this, you know, try a balloon, you know, predictive programming, and then you start saying it over and over and over again until enough people actually believe it.

00:21:38.380 And then it becomes its own reality.

00:21:40.100 And then once it does that, it starts to snowball.

00:21:42.200 So I don't see this, you know, change in trend, you know, slowing down anytime soon, as long as the narrative is driven and focused on, you know, Donald Trump. And, you know, when they pulled out, pulled Trudeau out and announced this, you know, this rigorous process of, you know, electing a new leader, I said, at that point, I said, you know, now it's very likely that the Conservatives are going to lose their majority government, they're probably going to win a minority, and they might even lose the election because

00:22:12.180 of this and you know fast forward uh two months later a month and a half later and that's the

00:22:16.980 position that we're in it was very easy and it was really nothing to do with you know uh you know

00:22:22.740 pierre polyev or or or justin trudeau but had everything to do with how easily manipulated

00:22:28.100 the average person is into buying a false narrative or or or straight up propaganda

00:22:34.900 it's interesting that you talk about your parents there and how they may have moved back

00:22:37.940 i i feel that way too like i i don't know anybody who gets their news from cbc like literally i

00:22:42.820 don't know anybody who believes it or trusts it and the people that i know who are sort of

00:22:46.740 of that older generation like the boomers they're the people that support true north and they like

00:22:53.300 hate and loathe and despise the cbc and they're always trying to convince their friends not to 0.56

00:22:57.860 watch it my own parents like i i would have considered my own parents to be more on the

00:23:02.100 conservative side they came out and visited us during it just happened that it overlapped they

00:23:06.660 They live in Vancouver.

00:23:07.740 They came out and visited it during the U.S. election.

00:23:10.140 And I could not believe how deranged they were.

00:23:12.800 I love my parents, all due respect.

00:23:14.260 But how deranged they were about President Trump.

00:23:16.800 Like they really, they were radicalized.

00:23:18.960 It's like they started watching the CBC.

00:23:21.300 All of a sudden they were watching MSNBC and hanging off their seats.

00:23:24.480 Everything that Rachel Maddow was telling them they believed to be true. 0.92

00:23:27.220 So they think that Donald Trump is a literal fascist who's going to invade Canada.

00:23:31.560 And it's like, it's hard to even like walk someone away from that position. 0.98

00:23:36.120 But it does make you realize that the CBC still does have a stronghold, even though their viewership is at an all time low and people who are online, people like us, it's so easy to mock them because they're so ridiculous.

00:23:48.040 But but there is a subset of the population, maybe even a critical subset that still believes and hangs off every word that Rosemary Barton and the CBC has to say.

00:23:58.240 What do you think, Brett?

00:23:59.740 Well, if we're talking about parents, I'll just share a little anecdote there.

00:24:04.240 my my uh mother what used to be one of those uh people who would watch cbc she had cnn on the tv 1.00

00:24:12.960 like all the time uh back when uh trump's first presidency and i used to tell her uh i i had he

00:24:19.740 well i've assigned he was a lot younger at that time i said i'm not letting him go over there if

00:24:23.740 you're just going to be playing propaganda all the time you know with cbc and cnn i was like

00:24:29.260 just turn it off when he goes over and but if you're not going to i don't want one going over

00:24:33.360 Kind of in a somewhat joking way, but also serious.

00:24:37.220 And, you know, it wasn't until the coronavirus pandemic and all that where, and really after the vaccine rolled out, she realized how much they actually lie, right?

00:24:52.440 That's when she started to see through them.

00:24:54.060 And now I would say she's, to use a term, she's kind of red-pilled now. 1.00

00:24:59.500 So there is, people can break through that.

00:25:02.080 well that's nice uh that must be nice for you i'm still trying to find a way to red pill my own

00:25:06.960 parents but yeah i to me watching how the cbc covered the trucker convoy like i've never been

00:25:13.520 a fan of the cbc and i think they've gotten markedly worse over the last decade but watching

00:25:18.320 how that narrative unfolded i mean for us as like independent journalists we were watching it too

00:25:23.680 and what i saw was like a hopeful movement of like working class people saying enough is enough we've

00:25:29.800 had enough and Canadians rallying around. It was like a beautiful story of like an uprising

00:25:35.140 in support of freedom. And then to see the way that it wasn't just CBC, but it was all of them,

00:25:39.760 CTV, all the newspapers, everybody just viewed it in this totally different lens. I believe it was

00:25:44.920 getting fed to them by the Trudeau government that they decided we have to paint these people 0.89

00:25:48.380 as insurrectionists, as like a January 6th, they're far-right racist fascists, they're funded

00:25:53.540 by the Americans, this whole story that at the time there was no evidence to point to it. But

00:25:58.940 way that they in in a coordinated in fact it was it was a psyop it was propaganda and i do think

00:26:04.540 that that experience that one story did red pill to use your term but a lot of people like i mean

00:26:10.140 i meet people almost all the time who say you know it was during the pandemic during the trucker

00:26:15.260 convoy specifically the freedom convoy that i came to realize that i could trust true north and i

00:26:20.380 could not trust the cbc um and so you know those those are opportunities for us but at the same time

00:26:25.820 time, you know, we're still just a fraction of the population. And I'm worried that, well,

00:26:33.300 that they could continue and that we could see, like six weeks ago, if you told me Mark Carney

00:26:37.140 is not only going to be selected as prime minister by the Liberal Party, but that he will go into a

00:26:41.500 general election and win, I would be like, that's just an absolute pipe dream, never going to happen.

00:26:47.120 You know, the Canadian people want an election, they want Trudeau gone, they want to punish the

00:26:50.160 Liberals, Pierre Polyev will win in a sweeping majority, like 100%. And now it's like, you know,

00:26:56.200 we're at the end of February. And I think that the odds of Polyev winning have gone down

00:27:01.580 remarkably. What do you think about that, Kevin? Yeah, like, you know, my first time I came out

00:27:09.720 publicly, you know, on a public forum and said that Carney is going to be the next Prime Minister.

00:27:13.860 It was back in 2019. So I've been talking about, you know, Mark Carney replacing Justin Trudeau for a very long time. So, you know, it doesn't surprise me at all that not only is Carney going to be the next, you know, Prime Minister, Liberal leader and Prime Minister in what, like two weeks? He'll be the next Prime Minister.

00:27:39.260 Yeah, 10 days.

00:27:39.980 Yeah, that doesn't surprise me. And it doesn't surprise me that he may actually have a chance at forming government. And if he doesn't form government, you know, and the Conservatives manage to pull out a minority, then he'll have the ability to form a coalition government, right?

00:27:59.460 and then, you know, launch a non-confidence vote in 12 to 18 months

00:28:04.520 and then form government after that, you know,

00:28:09.360 take Polyev out through a non-confidence vote.

00:28:12.840 So that is likely, you know, what's going to happen

00:28:16.620 is they're either going to form government

00:28:18.820 or they're going to topple the government

00:28:20.140 in a relatively short amount of time.

00:28:22.580 And what do you think about that, Brett?

00:28:24.080 Well, I mean, I remember when Trudeau announced his resignation, everybody celebrated, yay, Trudeau's going to resign.

00:28:32.660 Yeah, he's out of here.

00:28:33.500 But I remember thinking at the time and writing it that, you know, it would have been a lot better if Justin Trudeau had led the liberals into the next election and taken them all down with him because he wasn't going to go anywhere.

00:28:47.000 You know, he wasn't going to get reelected.

00:28:48.500 So it would have been much better if he stayed on as the leader and dragged the Liberal Party down with him.

00:28:56.100 Okay, let's move on because we had an election in Ontario last night.

00:28:59.360 I don't think the results surprised anyone, but Doug Ford cruised to his third straight consecutive majority government in Ontario.

00:29:07.780 It wasn't close. Within minutes after the polls closed, the results were in.

00:29:14.660 And whoops, are we having some technical difficulties?

00:29:16.160 okay. The results we're in, it looks at this point like the PCs will win with 43% of the vote,

00:29:22.700 80 seats. NDP gets 27. So they'll hold on to their official opposition status. The liberal party down

00:29:29.540 to 14 seats, even though interestingly, they got 30% of the vote. So much more, much bigger percent

00:29:34.860 of the vote than the NDP. But the NDP's vote clearly was much more efficient. You had two

00:29:39.960 green parties seats and one independent. So a couple of interesting facts about the election

00:29:46.700 last night. Voter turnout was incredibly low, right? So we had, it looks like the voter turnout

00:29:51.480 was 45%. So fewer than half of eligible voters on Ontario bothered to show up just slightly above

00:29:57.800 the 2022. 2022 was also noted for being extremely low voter turnout, only 44%. And I suppose that

00:30:04.880 was still COVID related. I don't really know. Back in 2018, voter turnout was 57%. So considerably

00:30:12.560 lower. And if you look at the federal numbers, like in 2015, 68% of Canadians voted, eligible

00:30:19.000 voters voted. 2019, it was 67. 2021, it was 62. And again, that was like a COVID election. So not a

00:30:26.840 lot of enthusiasm. I would read that as like a lot of the sort of base of the conservative party

00:30:32.140 stayed home because they weren't very enthusiastic about Doug Ford. But still, you know, it's

00:30:38.340 historic. So we will play this clip of Doug Ford at his victory speech. Of course, part of the

00:30:44.340 reason that he won, part of the reason the auction happened is because he was pitting himself as

00:30:48.400 the opponent of Donald Trump, the one that can stand up to Donald Trump. So here he is

00:30:52.720 at his victory speech talking about President Trump.

00:30:55.400 Donald Trump thinks he can break us. He thinks he can divide and conquer, pit region against region.

00:31:04.560 Donald Trump doesn't know what we know. He is underestimating us.

00:31:10.360 He is underestimating the resilience of the Canadian people, the Canadian spirit.

00:31:16.180 Make no mistake, Canada won't start a fight with the U.S., but you better believe we're ready to win one.

00:31:23.360 Okay, so Doug Ford doing his thing. Now you had some sad faces over at the CBC afterwards. Here

00:31:31.000 is Rosemary Barton downplaying Doug Ford's victory. She's saying that the key takeaway

00:31:36.320 is that Doug Ford should be very careful, apparently, and that this was not a sweeping

00:31:41.180 supermajority. Let's play that clip. I don't think that Doug Ford can look at this result

00:31:46.640 and not take some sort of message from it. Yes, the message can be people still like me. I have

00:31:52.380 a mandate now to go ahead and deal with Donald Trump, but I think it would be foolish to not

00:31:58.440 also take from the results tonight. I have to be careful. This is not the sweeping supermajority

00:32:05.560 that we've been talking about. I don't know. It does look like a sweeping supermajority to me.

00:32:11.640 I can't imagine liberals winning that many seats and them saying anything like that. Brett,

00:32:16.700 what do you think? Well, that was the first time I watched CBC in a long time. So that was interesting.

00:32:22.380 I don't know. Doug Ford, he's basically just a liberal light. So it's not surprising that in a province that is a very liberal province that he would come away with the victory. Yeah.

00:32:42.940 okay kevin do you have any thoughts on it i mean it it's predictable and the the one of the posts

00:32:50.780 that i put out this morning was you know how can you hold all these covid collaborators to account

00:32:56.940 if you keep re-electing them to government right you know look what doug ford did a lot of people

00:33:01.580 say oh you know you can blame you know justin trudeau's liberals for what they did federally

00:33:05.420 and they did a lot you know with with their you know mandates and restrictions but you know they

00:33:11.340 They also handed out money to, I think it was, you know, over a billion dollars to get, you know, premiers to buy into the passport program.

00:33:19.640 So, you know, it was, you know, that was a provincial issue.

00:33:22.240 You know, you know, what Doug Ford did with Adamson's barbecue with it, with the, you know, shutting it down and, you know, basically dragging them out, you know, authoritarian style arrests in front of the cameras.

00:33:35.640 You know, a lot of the tyrannical lockdown policies were not just from the federal government, they're from the provincial governments as well.

00:33:46.080 So that was the biggest issue that I that I have that, you know, how can we hold these people to account when we keep reelecting them?

00:33:53.700 That just guarantees that there's going to be more of it in the future, because now you just normalized all that stuff that they that they did in the past and said, yeah, who cares?

00:34:03.140 you know we we destroyed your small business who cares if we destroyed your livelihood

00:34:07.300 who cares if we you know that caused a rise in crime right that caused a rise in substance abuse

00:34:13.180 because that's generally the two areas that people gravitate towards when in in in tough

00:34:21.080 economic times is crime and drugs right so you know all this economic attack that that our own

00:34:27.160 governments have done um you know have driven these crime rights have driven these you know

00:34:33.260 these these these substance abuse problems and people like oh well okay oh well who cares you

00:34:38.640 know he's better than the rest of them i mean like voting for the best house on the on the worst block

00:34:45.220 is how we got here to begin with and there is no accountability from the people to to actually

00:34:52.580 want change they're just like yeah we'll just go along to get along who cares we'll just turn

00:34:57.140 on the netflix and you know tune or tune myself out uh what what can i do you know what can we do

00:35:02.900 um there's nothing we can do we can't change the system because i was on a podcast last night

00:35:08.660 uh an alberta podcast with a friend uh sean newman who has a great podcast out there we're

00:35:12.740 talking about the ontario election and they were asking like how come there wasn't a backlash

00:35:16.660 against the insane lockdown policies of the doug ford government and my response was that i think

00:35:22.900 they were popular i think people liked it i think that they were happy about it they wanted the

00:35:26.420 economy to be shut down they were scared they bought into all the worst fear and narratives

00:35:30.980 i mean like i even in toronto i i feel like people preferred it it was it was strange and for me like

00:35:38.340 i grew up in western canada i'm from vancouver i have very little tolerance for policies that

00:35:43.380 restrict my personal freedom and that of my family like i have a very little tolerance for it i am

00:35:48.260 very libertarian in that way like when they say you can't go outside i will go outside i will not

00:35:52.580 follow a stupid rule unless i absolutely have to because i'm not willing to get arrested over it 0.61

00:35:56.980 but the idea that they were putting police tape around the playground across the street from my 0.99

00:36:00.420 house so my kids couldn't play in a playground in the middle of the day was so absurd but i

00:36:04.500 did feel like i was the outlier i feel like most people in toronto most people i know were just

00:36:08.740 like happy to go along or they just didn't bother saying anything and you know maybe maybe because

00:36:12.900 a lot of people are in this sort of laptop class and it was easy for them it was actually better

00:36:16.660 for them to be able to work from home or or some other reason um but what do you think like like

00:36:21.540 why wasn't there a backlash against Ford for the tyrannical overreach during COVID?

00:36:26.660 That is a really tough question. I mean, you said yourself, I mean, you just showed how many people

00:36:32.500 actually stayed home and didn't turn out to vote at all. So I think a lot of those people who

00:36:37.380 didn't go vote were people who didn't like them because of a lot of the lockdowns and mandates

00:36:44.580 and vaccine coercion, that kind of stuff. And they just didn't want to show up to vote at all.

00:36:50.820 um so kevin i mean you were talking before about uh you you know uh why wasn't why wasn't there

00:36:58.100 a backlash against them why do they keep voting these people in well what's the alternative and

00:37:03.220 and you know they're really uh in in uh this election i believe there are two other parties

00:37:10.100 that were kind of against the all the stuff that went on during the coronavirus i think

00:37:15.380 uh well definitely the ontario party and that is um yeah derek sloan and we had them on the show

00:37:24.580 earlier yeah and then you also have new blue and i'm not sure actually what what their stance was

00:37:30.260 during all of this but i mean they would be alternatives but i think between those two they

00:37:34.020 got less than less than two percent of the vote something like that so people didn't even show up

00:37:38.100 to to vote for them and why not is it just because uh they don't get enough exposure

00:37:45.780 are they is there need a stronger ground game do they need more candidates elected i know that

00:37:51.220 this was a snap election and that hurt uh a little bit for for like the ontario party because they

00:37:58.260 they put something together really fast and they weren't able to to put in a full slate of candidates

00:38:02.980 so a lot of people you know in in their own ridings they just didn't have an alternative

00:38:07.140 to vote for yeah you're right and so it just seems i mean we talked about the same topic

00:38:12.820 on the podcast last night which was that the the establishment parties have so much power so much

00:38:18.100 inertia so much help to see in in organizing and getting people on the ground uh that it that it's

00:38:23.700 hard for an upstart party and yet i think there was one little glimmer of hope and i want to tell

00:38:28.660 the story about the unstoppable independent mp bobby ann brady who was re-elected last night as

00:38:36.020 an independent MPP in the riding of Haldeman Norfolk. And it wasn't even close. Bobbie Ann

00:38:42.660 Brady received 63% of the vote, 64% with rounding in her riding. She beat the PC candidate, Amy

00:38:51.460 Martin, who only got 24%, only 12,000. So she won by more than 20,000 votes, which is really

00:38:58.420 incredible for an MPP. And I just want to tell her story because oftentimes with independent MPs,

00:39:03.540 the person is first elected with an establishment party and then they become an independent. That

00:39:08.660 is not the case with Bobbie Ann. She was always an independent. So her story is that prior to

00:39:14.260 being elected, she worked as the executive assistant to the progressive conservative MPP

00:39:19.860 in her area named Tony Barrett. Tony was quite popular. When Tony announced that he was retiring,

00:39:26.020 he endorsed his assistant Bobby Ann Brady to be the successor and I guess party headquarters

00:39:35.320 Doug Ford's office didn't like that they decided that they wanted to parachute in their own

00:39:39.520 candidate of choice they wanted to put in the local mayor as the candidate and so Bobby Ann

00:39:46.120 decided to she wasn't going to have it so she continued to run as an independent she won in

00:39:52.240 that race in 2022, not by as big of a margin. And she sort of acted as a thorn in the side of the 0.80

00:39:58.080 PC government. Here is a clip from the legislature. Here is Bobby M. Brady pesting, pushing the

00:40:04.440 premier. This is on April 18th, 2024, pushing the premier, pushing back against him. And just note

00:40:11.520 the reaction. Doug Ford does not like this. He does not like facing criticism, particularly from

00:40:17.320 someone on the political right. And so he takes this jab at her saying you won't even have a job

00:40:22.880 after the next election. Let's play that clip. In January, I launched a petition calling on

00:40:27.940 this government to follow the lead of Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe. No response except for carbon

00:40:34.080 tax referendum legislation that does absolutely nothing to help the people of Ontario today.

00:40:39.340 It's a publicity stunt. You call that a publicity stunt? By the way, you won't have a job next

00:40:44.980 election. Well, sorry, Doug Ford, you were wrong because she does have a job and she was reelected 0.99

00:40:56.200 with a massive, massive majority in her riding. So, I mean, to me, this is one glimmer of hope

00:41:02.340 that there are still independent minded folks in Ontario willing to push back, willing to send

00:41:06.680 that message. Maybe that little, you know, that one riding with that one strong woman, independent 0.57

00:41:11.960 MP pushing back against him on carbon taxes and cost of living issues. Maybe that is where the

00:41:17.980 groundswell of support saying, we're not actually very happy with this PC government. We don't

00:41:21.920 actually like the direction that it's taking. And in that writing, people did show up. They did show

00:41:26.680 up to voice their criticisms and possibly even push back over the COVID overreach. What's your

00:41:32.960 thoughts on that? We'll go to you first, Brett. Yeah, it'll be interesting to see how many people,

00:41:38.120 what the percentage of people in her riding showed up to to vote is um compared to you know the 44

00:41:47.080 overall um i think it's i think it's great i think that uh in general we need a lot more independent

00:41:53.880 uh well mpps and and mps at the federal level um a lot of uh times people you know

00:42:01.480 know, go against what they believe because they're told by the party leader how to think

00:42:09.180 and, you know, they're basically threatened with their job or not having anywhere to advance

00:42:17.160 or they're stuck on the backbench.

00:42:20.380 So and even, you know, like, for example, Pierre Polyev now, he's a leader, but when

00:42:29.000 he was an mp and he was like the shadow finance critic and all that like he i'll give an example

00:42:37.720 here if you recall during the uh when during the coronavirus when uh trudeau wanted to go

00:42:44.840 on a big spending spree where he had unlimited money uh well everybody voted unanimously to

00:42:51.080 let him do that you know so that ran up the deficit quite a bit and he was shadow finance

00:42:57.960 critic at that point and all we needed was one person with a backbone at that time to say no we

00:43:03.240 can't let trudeau go on this spending spree you know just one person for for to not be unanimous

00:43:08.280 but nobody did that you know if there was an independent person out there who said no we can't

00:43:12.840 do this we have to vote on this we have to make sure that he has limits on what he can spend and

00:43:16.760 what he can spend it on because we don't need to be spending for coronavirus pandemic we don't need

00:43:22.760 to be taking some of that money and sending it over for uh women to have abortions in africa 1.00

00:43:28.280 which he did ridiculous things with it like that right and well yeah and i mean the one that i was

00:43:32.680 really outraged about was i think it was called bill c4 which was basically uh it was it was

00:43:37.240 billed as something about stopping conversion therapy but it actually did the exact opposite

00:43:40.840 it said that if there was a gender confused child they weren't allowed to go to any doctor unless it 0.55

00:43:46.120 was gender affirming and that got unanimous consent there were conservatives who pushed back against

00:43:50.920 it they waited for some of those conservatives to to go out of town and so that they could have a

00:43:55.080 vote so that the the dissident voices weren't in the house and pier poliev was one of the people

00:43:59.560 who was there voting as a absolutely disgraceful i mean poliev has sort of redeemed himself coming

00:44:04.360 out saying that he would ban puberty blockers and all other kinds of mutilating uh things for

00:44:09.880 children um but you're right that that at critical times we haven't seen that independent streak in

00:44:15.720 polyev and i wish we had sorry continue you were saying yeah i mean it that's just an example of

00:44:21.160 how you know he as party leader he may have done something different but and now everybody's saying

00:44:28.920 well that was under o'toole he had to and you know to a certain degree they're right so that's that

00:44:33.400 is why we need more independent uh mps and uh i don't know i guess this is a template maybe

00:44:41.320 for how to how to do that right look at how bobby and uh managed to to get so many votes

00:44:48.360 study that and see if we can replicate that somehow at other levels well i i plan to i want

00:44:54.280 to have her on my show to explain it because to me it's remarkable like it wasn't just a fluke the

00:44:58.600 first time around she really cemented her majority 63 64 choosing to vote for a non-party affiliated

00:45:06.520 candidate really something there's how the voter turnout was in her writing i don't see that here

00:45:12.280 i will i'll look it up i couldn't find it easily here but um i'll try to get those um the stats

00:45:18.920 for you just get just bear with me for a minute there were a couple of other notable people who

00:45:23.160 were not elected uh last night uh one of them another attempted independent mpp this one kind

00:45:29.240 of follows a template that i described her name is sarah jama she was an ndp candidate and an mpp

00:45:36.200 but the party ousted her and she basically was becoming increasingly radical and deranged

00:45:41.480 supporting very fringe causes and then after the october 7th attacks she just kind of lost it

00:45:46.920 and even even for the radical ndp she was too far so they pushed her out of the party she ran

00:45:51.800 independently she was not re-elected and the liberal party leader herself body crombie who

00:45:58.840 we were told was a popular mayor from mississauga and that she was gonna help the liberal party pick

00:46:03.880 up a bunch of seats in around the gta and in mississauga uh you can take that down um bonnie

00:46:09.960 crombie did not win her seat either she was uh she was beat by the progressive conservative it

00:46:18.440 looks like it was fairly close it looks like you know margin of 1200 votes is full three percent

00:46:23.960 and yet in her uh speech her concession speech bonnie crombie committed to staying on as leader

00:46:31.000 of the liberal party uh so i mean if you're if you're a liberal looking at this liberals

00:46:36.440 and do very well they're not even the opposition party um could this possibly be a preview for the

00:46:41.880 federal election and popularity ontario i'll send that one over to you kevin what do you think

00:46:48.520 what what what brett was talking what brett was talking about you know um how the independent mp

00:46:54.120 actually managed to to win we we have to study that and we have to emulate that we have to we

00:46:59.480 We have to copy that because what it says is, you know, if you know that movie that Robin Williams did, you know, 20 years ago, if you're tired of the Republicans and if you're tired of the Democrats, you know, basically vote for me.

00:47:10.300 So, you know, you need somebody who, you know, attacks, you know, both parties and distance themselves from, you know, both parties.

00:47:18.900 And, you know, maybe that is something that she did that, you know, really, you know, attracted people to not only elect her, but to reelect her.

00:47:29.560 You know, that is a winning strategy. That's something that we should be focusing on.

00:47:33.980 You know, in terms of your other question, can you tee it up to me again?

00:47:38.640 Well, so I just want to recap.

00:47:41.080 So Brett, you asked what was the voter turnout in that riding in Haldimand Norfolk because the general election was down in the 40s.

00:47:49.740 Well, she received 54.7, so 55 percent voter turnout, so a full 10 percent higher than the rest of the province.

00:47:58.360 So, yeah, to me, that indicates that conservatives like small C conservative voters, voters that would also support the federal conservatives showed up in that riding.

00:48:06.860 And it shows you that if you organize and you motivate your base and you have a message that appeals to them, even without the party brand, you can get those people out to vote.

00:48:16.360 So I'll leave that final question to you, Kevin.

00:48:18.700 What do you what do you make of it?

00:48:20.360 That's that's that is 100 percent.

00:48:23.380 You know, a lot of that 50 the 50 percent of the people didn't didn't show up is because, you know, maybe they thought, oh, they're all the same.

00:48:30.080 You know, my vote doesn't count.

00:48:31.660 My voice doesn't count.

00:48:33.200 Doug Ford is going to win.

00:48:34.260 That is probably the three primary, you know, excuses of the 50%. 1.00

00:48:40.420 And, you know, if 50% of the people showed up and in her riding, it was closer to 60, right?

00:48:48.820 Yeah, 50, 58, 50, what did I just say?

00:48:51.640 55, sorry, 55.

00:48:53.300 Yeah, so that is actually a substantial increase.

00:48:57.260 When was the last time the Ontario average voting show up for the entire province was in the mid-50s? You read up the statistics earlier. It's been a very long time. So that is something that people have to do, have to really tap into that anti, and I think it's more anti-establishment parties.

00:49:19.900 You know, you know, I have nothing to do with the conservatives. I have nothing to do with the liberals. I hate them all. And, you know, I'm not going to answer to lobbyists. I'm not going to pander to corporations. I'm not going to pander to the unions.

00:49:33.340 and, you know, I'm going to, you know, actually stand up and try to give the people the voice

00:49:39.600 instead of, you know, all these NGOs and, you know, political muscle that dominates the arena now.

00:49:47.200 Just completely ignore them and, you know, actually align yourself with the people.

00:49:53.400 The people will say, hey, maybe you're worth voting for.

00:49:56.440 And that is clearly what has happened in this situation.

00:50:00.640 And one more thing before we end off, you know, on the tariff issue that I wanted to talk about, you know, the easiest concession that we could do is sacrifice our supply management system.

00:50:12.600 I think that is one thing that, and it's coming to the end of the show, I really wanted to get that on.

00:50:17.380 I think that would be the cheapest avenue, the easiest thing to do.

00:50:23.820 And it would actually, you know, Donald Trump has talked about our dairy cartel for a very long time.

00:50:31.200 I agree. I mean, I don't want to get too much into it because we do have to cut off here.

00:50:35.880 But I think that it's low hanging fruit and it's time.

00:50:39.600 Like Canada needs to get its house in order. We need to stop.

00:50:42.120 A lot of the things that Donald Trump says is incendiary and ridiculous. 0.93

00:50:46.000 But some of the things, he is tapping into real concerns.

00:50:50.340 I think Canada does need to do a better job

00:50:51.860 liberalizing our markets.

00:50:53.320 We need to do a better job cracking down on drugs.

00:50:55.420 We need to do a better job securing our borders.

00:50:57.280 So I completely agree.

00:50:58.840 I guess I'll have to have you two fellows back on the show.

00:51:01.620 We can talk more about some of these issues.

00:51:04.300 But thank you so much for joining me.

00:51:06.140 So that has been Brett Sears and Kevin,

00:51:09.420 who runs a popular X account called Government X is Corrupt.

00:51:12.660 Follow them both on X.

00:51:13.520 These are great independent researchers and citizen journalists.

00:51:17.080 So that's the end of the show, everyone.

00:51:18.580 Have a wonderful weekend.

00:51:19.820 Thank you for tuning in.

00:51:21.460 I'm Candace Malcolm.

00:51:22.140 This is the Candace Malcolm Show.

00:51:23.120 Thank you.

Juno News - February 28, 2025

President Trump SLAMS Pierre Poilievre

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript