Juno News - April 21, 2022


Proposed ‘pick-up truck tax’ the latest in Trudeau’s war against the working class

Topics
Mentioned
What Trudeau's censorship legislation means for Canadian content creators Trudeau wants to tax your pickup truck

Episode Stats


Length

31 minutes

Words per minute

184.37

Word count

5,873

Sentence count

410

Harmful content

Misogyny

3

sentences flagged

Toxicity

6

sentences flagged

Hate speech

2

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

A new tax on pickup trucks has been proposed by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his environmental advisory board, and the author of a piece about it, Chris Sims, joins The Candace Malan Show to talk about it.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Prime Minister Justin Trudeau loathes the working class. The latest example his government is
00:00:04.520 cooking up is a new tax on pickup trucks. I'm Candace Malcolm and this is The Candace Malcolm
00:00:09.180 Show. Hi everyone, thank you so much for tuning in. So you might have seen this article over
00:00:25.400 at the Toronto Sun. The headline is Trudeau is planning a tax on trucks. Well, I have the author
00:00:31.700 of that piece with me today. Her name is Chris Sims. She's a BC director over at the Canadian
00:00:36.540 Taxpayers Federation. Chris spent time in Ottawa working both as a political staffer and a
00:00:41.080 communications director. She was also a print and radio journalist. Her first role in the news
00:00:46.260 was at 580 CFRA News Talk Ottawa. She became an anchor over there, then became a reporter at the
00:00:52.260 CTV Parliamentary Bureau. She was also a founding reporter over at the Sun News Network, where I
00:00:58.040 had the pleasure and the honour of working with her. She covered the big important issues of the day,
00:01:02.600 including the growing big government, personal liberty, and rural Canada. So Chris, thank you
00:01:07.920 so much for joining the show. It is so great to see you. Thank you. Yeah, so tell us about your report.
00:01:14.260 Tell us about this new pickup truck tax the Trudeau government is trying to, I don't know, sneak by
00:01:19.700 or sneak in or what his plans he's scheming about introducing this tax. For sure. So I first saw
00:01:27.400 an inkling of this in Blacklock's reporter, and it was around a month ago or so. And they mentioned,
00:01:33.800 it was a very brief posting that they had on their website. They said, hey, there's this advisory panel
00:01:38.520 to the prime minister that is recommending, among other things, a levy on pickup trucks. I'm like,
00:01:45.200 that's kind of interesting. And so because of my experience on Parliament Hill, I know that these
00:01:51.620 so-called advisory boards often have a lot of clout in Ottawa. So I started digging around on the
00:01:58.060 Environment Canada webpage. Sure enough, right there in the official report, I'm talking the 2030 emissions
00:02:05.740 reductions plan published by the Ministry of Environment with a foreword from Minister Guibo,
00:02:12.060 calling it a roadmap, was right there. Recommendation. It was on page 192. And word
00:02:18.480 for word, it included the recommendation to remove the exemption for the green levy so that it also
00:02:25.260 affects vehicles like pickup trucks. So what that means in normal people talk is that right now we
00:02:32.240 have the so-called green levy, but it only hits really big SUVs. So I'm talking like the Toyota Sequoia,
00:02:39.680 the Nissan Armada, those really big SUVs. It was put through by the Harper government in 2007.
00:02:46.240 But pickup trucks are expressly exempt. It's right there in the regulations. It does not touch pickup
00:02:53.240 trucks for obvious reasons. They're the most popular vehicles in Canada. If you step outside
00:02:58.860 any downtown urban core, they are the workhorses on all of our roadways. And so that is why they,
00:03:05.260 of course, exempted them because they didn't want to nail that many people with such a big tax.
00:03:09.140 This recommendation says in black and white, they should remove that exemption.
00:03:14.720 More importantly, I went and checked to see where the regulations kick in. You know,
00:03:19.480 how much fuel do you have to use in order to be nailed with this tax? And the answer is
00:03:24.420 more than 13 liters per hundred kilometers. So I went and checked all of the, you know,
00:03:31.380 fuel usage of the most popular vehicles. And sure enough, the Ford F-150, the Chevy Silverado 1500,
00:03:37.820 the Dodge Ram pickups 1500s, the light duty trucks would all be nailed with about a thousand dollars
00:03:44.920 tax. The bigger ones, if you need to get, say, a 3500, if you're towing a trailer, if you've got
00:03:51.660 construction equipment and you need a pickup truck with more snort to it, you're going to be hit with
00:03:56.860 either $3,000 or $4,000 on the sale of a new pickup if they enacted this tax. And so that's why I wrote
00:04:03.940 the piece for the Toronto Sun and sounded the alarm.
00:04:07.500 It's so interesting that they would try to sneak that by. So the minister puts it out by him on his
00:04:12.280 own. It's part of his report. And yet the minister responded to your piece over in the Toronto Sun,
00:04:19.520 Environment Minister Stephen Goebbaut. He responded. He said that the proposed tax doesn't exist. In fact,
00:04:25.540 he called your piece disinformation, divisive, and fear-mongering. This is, of course, because
00:04:31.120 conservative politicians like Pierre Polyev, Jason Kenney, Scott Moe have all been sharing your piece
00:04:37.120 with their base and with their email lists, rightly so, to say, look, this is what the Trudeau government
00:04:42.460 has planned. So what do you make of the minister's dismissiveness of your piece and how do you respond
00:04:51.420 to that? Well, it's pretty concerning. And so what they could have done if they really wanted to dump
00:04:56.980 water on this, if they were truly panicked, they could have said, you know what, this is a small
00:05:01.540 mistake. We actually should have put a dissenting opinion by the minister right underneath the
00:05:06.480 recommendation, or we shouldn't have included the recommendation at all in our piece. There's lots
00:05:11.940 of options when you're sitting around the minister's table on how to handle this sort of a situation.
00:05:18.340 But instead, he went on the attack against the Canadian Taxpayers Federation. We are more than 30
00:05:24.600 years old. We are a grassroots organization. We have a ton of supporters, as you know. So they went after
00:05:30.920 us, calling us disinformation. They went after the Toronto Sun, calling them disinformation. They've been
00:05:36.860 putting out newspapers since the early 70s. So very standard, respected media. And what I actually find
00:05:45.180 very concerning about this is that the minister responsible for calling that disinformation is also
00:05:53.020 the minister who spearheaded Bill C-10, which is now called Bill C-11. And that, of course, is the
00:05:59.600 proposed internet gag law, which would put bureaucrats in charge of what you can see, hear, and share on the
00:06:06.080 internet. So to have that minister of the crown calling this piece, which is fact-based disinformation,
00:06:14.400 is really concerning. And also, it's annoying because anyone who's ever worked on Parliament Hill
00:06:22.480 knows how this works. This is how baby taxes are born. You know, mommy report walks down the aisle 0.96
00:06:29.840 with daddy proposal, and then the bureaucrats write it up, and then they present it in the House, and then
00:06:35.140 they debate it at committee, and voila, new bill, new taxes are born. That's how that works. And so
00:06:41.780 anybody knows this. And now it's the playing dumb that's pretty annoying. 0.99
00:06:47.700 Well, not just playing dumb, but pearl clutching and going on the attack by calling you 0.99
00:06:51.620 disinformation, the exact same buzzword, that's like the latest buzzword on the left, 0.97
00:06:55.700 that they use to describe information that is true, but they just don't like it. And it isn't just the
00:07:01.060 minister. I mean, I've been in the same situation, Chris. I had an opinion piece once in the Toronto
00:07:05.620 Sun saying that the carbon tax was a tax. And the environment minister at the time, Catherine McKenna,
00:07:11.860 tweeted out, this is fake news. It's not a tax. It's a rebate, right? And we all know how that ended.
00:07:18.820 But this idea that you have really powerful people, ministers of the crown, attacking journalists,
00:07:24.980 reporters, researchers like yourself, and using these buzzwords like disinformation or fake news,
00:07:30.740 and then turning around saying we're going to ban disinformation and fake news. It's like,
00:07:34.100 what you're really doing is banning views that you don't like, opinions that you don't like,
00:07:38.020 or things that are going to be politically problematic for you. Because I know that your
00:07:42.020 piece is getting shared left, right and center, that it is a big rallying issue for conservatives,
00:07:46.820 because it's a culture war issue as well. Before we get into some of those culture war
00:07:51.940 questions, I have to note that Aaron Weary, a reporter over at the CBC, has also jumped into
00:07:57.940 the fray. And he said that basically, everyone's getting worked up about a tax that doesn't exist.
00:08:04.100 I find it really interesting, because his piece sort of repeats what you said, that this was an annex,
00:08:09.780 that the government released a report, and this was annexed to it, and it was part of
00:08:14.420 recommendations. It wasn't government proposal, it wasn't legislation. So he kind of just repeated what
00:08:19.140 you said, but his headline was very snarky. Some conservatives are condemning a truck tax that
00:08:24.820 doesn't exist. And, you know, and so he walks us through exactly what your report says. And then
00:08:30.500 he spends like the rest of the article talking about how, well, we probably should have a truck tax
00:08:35.540 because climate change and blah, blah, blah. So what do you make of the fact that the CBC has come
00:08:41.300 swinging into Justin Trudeau's rescue, and trying to pour water on this whole issue for them?
00:08:46.980 Well, I'm not surprised. I sure don't like paying $1.4 billion to that corp for them to come to
00:08:54.420 Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's defence. I find it rather silly that the same people who will say,
00:09:01.540 we shouldn't have these, quote unquote, gas guzzlers on the road, that pickup trucks are bad
00:09:06.500 for the environment, etc, etc. That's a legitimate position to have. I completely disagree with it,
00:09:12.020 but at least it's a consistent position. But then they turn around, and as you put it,
00:09:16.900 pearl clutch to say, how dare you suggest they would ever impose such a fee on these pickup trucks
00:09:23.300 that we despise? Like, it's so weird. It's, you know, pick a lane, pick a lane. Do you want to tax
00:09:30.820 these things so that people might not be able to afford to buy them anymore? And ergo, in your mind,
00:09:36.500 they're not putting out as much fuel or emissions or whatever? Or do you not want to do this? Just
00:09:42.660 decide what you want to do. And to the point of saying it's in the annex, that was one of the
00:09:48.260 silliest arguments I've ever heard coming out of government. And it was pure spin. Annex means 0.83
00:09:54.820 in addition to. It's in the report. The report cover calls it an emission reduction plan. It's called
00:10:03.860 The Road Ahead Roadmap. You take a look and you read it. It's right in there. And frankly, a lot
00:10:09.300 of times when you're reading government documents, the most important information is in the annex.
00:10:15.060 If you look at a federal budget, everybody who's ever covered a budget well knows to flip to the back.
00:10:20.820 Get past all the fluffy stuff of why they're doing this to save women and children and whatever.
00:10:24.980 Then you get to the hard numbers which are in the back. So saying it's in the annex is super silly. 0.52
00:10:30.980 It's right there. And what also concerns me here is that if I was still a reporter and I always put
00:10:38.820 the shoe on the other foot, I ask myself, what if a conservative prime minister did or the purple
00:10:44.820 monkey party prime minister did? I don't care what party it is. We don't want to tax on pickup trucks
00:10:49.780 because we're the Canadian Taxpayers Federation. So I ask myself, if another prime minister of some other
00:10:55.140 colored jersey party was promoting a pickup truck tax, would I chase them down and say,
00:11:00.580 hey, this is in your report? Are you going to denounce this completely and swear you're never
00:11:04.900 going to do this? Darn tootin' I would. Of course I would. That's just standard W5 journalism. And so 0.98
00:11:11.620 this is where I'm a little bit scratching my head saying, okay, then why don't you ask the minister to
00:11:16.740 say we will never, ever, ever do this? And it was just a recommendation. And we're not doing this ever.
00:11:22.420 They haven't done that. It's one of the strange things with the media in Canada, Chris, where
00:11:27.780 rather than hold the politicians and the people with power accountable and to account for the
00:11:33.300 things that they're doing, they turn around and they hold the public or reporters or independent
00:11:38.660 researchers or the Canadian Taxpayers Federation accountable for their opinions or their positions
00:11:43.780 against the government. It happens time and time again. And every time it's like we're living in
00:11:48.820 this weird, bizarro world where, you know, Aaron Weary rather than, like you said, chasing down
00:11:53.780 these politicians and saying, well, wait a minute, is this coming? Is this something that you're
00:11:56.820 planning to do? He instinctively and immediately turns around and writes a piece that could have
00:12:01.380 been written by Stéphane Galbault. It could have been, I would say it could have been written by
00:12:04.740 Justin Trudeau, but we all know that Justin Trudeau doesn't write his own stuff. So it could have
00:12:08.340 been written by one of Justin Trudeau's own assistants or someone in the PMO. But instead,
00:12:13.780 you know, it's put out as legitimate news by the CBC. It's really wild. I want to pick up on this
00:12:20.740 idea. You know, pickup trucks are the most popular vehicles in Canada. I have a stat right in front
00:12:25.620 of me. Four of the five best-selling vehicles in Canada in 2020 were trucks. The number one spot
00:12:29.460 was a Ford F-150. 28,000 were sold in Canada. And that was a bad year because of COVID. That's
00:12:36.420 according to the CBC. So when we're talking about a proposed tax, it's significant. You're talking about
00:12:42.260 $1,000 to $4,000. It's a huge chunk out of someone's pocket. You know, you can't help but
00:12:48.340 feel like this really, you know, it's an attack, not just on people who drive a certain vehicle,
00:12:54.420 but on a certain way of life. Because in certain parts of the country, having a pickup truck is
00:13:00.340 absolutely necessary. I mean, we saw even just anecdotally during the trucker convoy, the CBC,
00:13:07.540 at one point, one of their vans fell into a ditch. I don't know if you saw this. And one of the
00:13:11.860 the truckers, with the pickup truck, pulled them out, right, without any hesitation. And,
00:13:16.740 you know, despite all of the name calling that CBC had been waging against these truckers. So,
00:13:22.100 you know, it's become kind of like a cultural symbol. And I just can't help but think that
00:13:28.100 this proposed tax is sort of punishment towards the working class. What do you think about the
00:13:32.020 culture war element here? That's definitely an element. I was raised in rural blue-collar working
00:13:37.780 class British Columbia, same as my husband. And if you just turn your head, you can usually see
00:13:44.100 eight to 12 of them downtown whenever we go down to pick up the mail or whatever. They're just standard,
00:13:49.140 like they're just so common. The idea of taxing them with this big thing is pretty concerning,
00:13:54.100 which is why I was so concerned about it, which is why I read the entire report that they put out,
00:13:59.060 and I wrote the story. And for folks who say, oh, well, you don't need it. No, you don't understand
00:14:04.900 then. Those folks probably haven't packed a bunch of poultry feed into the back of a Prius. They
00:14:10.980 haven't tried to shove a bunch of gyprock into the back of some, you know, tiny little hatchback if 1.00
00:14:15.940 they're a drywaller. There are tradespeople who rely on pickup trucks every single day to bring their 1.00
00:14:23.460 tools around. And even if they're not like directly employed in the trades, there are rural working
00:14:29.700 people who use them every day, like I just said, for bringing their feet around, towing some cattle.
00:14:35.220 You're not going to tow one of those horse trailers or a cattle trailer with a little hatchback. You just
00:14:42.260 can't. It doesn't have the power. And maybe one day we will all eventually have an electric vehicle that
00:14:49.700 runs on, I don't know, like the lithium crystals or a magic battery that's really easily rechargeable
00:14:55.220 or affordable. Who knows? That's not our beef. Our beef is here and now these vehicles are the most
00:15:02.020 popular selling vehicles in Canada. People across Canada rely on them. The government of Canada is
00:15:08.660 including a recommendation in their official report to tax them big time. And as you well know,
00:15:15.300 the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, we're the watchdogs. It's my job to start barking the moment
00:15:21.940 I see that burglar in your backyard. It's a failure if I wait to start barking when he's already running
00:15:28.820 down the street with your TV. Okay? So this is the entire point. We see things like this coming,
00:15:34.420 we bark really loud and we make sure that they never actually come to fruition.
00:15:38.180 Well, I think you've done your job because it looks like they're scared away so much that they're now
00:15:42.580 saying, no, no, not only are we not going to introduce this plan, we never even planned on
00:15:47.220 introducing this tax. So bravo on that. You wrote your piece. I thought this was really good.
00:15:52.660 Taxing someone's truck is kind of like taxing someone's laptop or someone's Zoom account for
00:15:57.620 the sort of stay at home class, work from home class. And it seems like there is this kind of
00:16:01.700 growing divide. I want to bring you back to the summer of 2021. There's sort of a culture war that
00:16:06.820 was starting to brew. There was an article published in a piece called, what was it called? The
00:16:12.020 passage that said this, it's time to ban the sale of pickup trucks. Pretty stark language there.
00:16:18.500 It was followed by a piece by Marcus G over in the Globe and Mail who said,
00:16:22.100 pickup trucks are a plague on Canadian streets. Now this really got under the skin of a whole bunch
00:16:27.460 of people in Canada, including Premier Jason Kenney in Alberta, who had his own response. He said the
00:16:34.100 Globe and Mail is having a temper tantrum about pickup trucks. Happy to say that 40% of the vehicles on the
00:16:38.500 road in Alberta are pickup trucks. Maybe Toronto columnists should try getting around the province
00:16:44.420 during a prairie blizzard in a smart car. Likewise, Lorraine Harper, former Prime Minister Stephen
00:16:50.420 Harper's wife, said this piece reads of snobbishness. Minus 40 stranded on the side of the highway with a
00:16:56.500 flat. Car wouldn't move. Cars are zipping by. The only person who stopped was a guy in a pickup truck.
00:17:01.460 Scott Moe said something similar. Come to Saskatchewan, where we all use our pickup trucks to build and grow
00:17:07.140 our province. It really does feel like a divide. And we saw this play out during COVID as well.
00:17:13.060 We saw it play out during the trucker convoy, where there's a pretty big difference between
00:17:16.900 Canadians who go out every day to work for a living, who drive trucks, who use their hands,
00:17:22.660 who build things, versus the sort of, you know, everyone stay at home and flatten the curve and
00:17:28.580 they make it seem so easy, like everyone can do it. What do you make of this sort of broader
00:17:35.460 cultural issue and how can we sort of mend this divide? I see it too, and I feel it too,
00:17:43.140 and I've experienced it too. So, like I said, I was raised in the Fraser Canyon. My, you know,
00:17:49.140 family all drive pickup trucks, all blue collar, working with their hands. I've got three cousins.
00:17:54.660 One's a boilermaker, the other's a drywaller, and the other's a mechanic. Like, it's just where it
00:17:59.380 comes from. My father-in-law is a heavy duty mechanic on trucks. And so, I lived that. I grew
00:18:05.380 up with it. We own a pickup truck ourselves. Not a fancy new one, but we own a pickup truck. And so,
00:18:10.740 we get that they're tools. They're just standard. It's so much so that you don't even really mention
00:18:14.900 them, that they're so common. And I've also worked in hyper-urban centers. I lived in the Glebe in Ottawa
00:18:22.100 for 13 years. I didn't have a car. I rode my bike and I walked everywhere. I did the latte thing. I'm
00:18:28.580 working on a laptop with you right now. And I'm very lucky to be sitting in an office on a laptop.
00:18:34.100 And so, I see both worlds. And I think it's sad that if you're in one of those other worlds, that
00:18:41.620 you can't empathize with the other person. And I think that's a big problem. And I think it's one of
00:18:48.420 the reasons why we're seeing the kind of nasty, vehement, almost personal, almost personal reaction
00:18:55.540 coming from folks like Minister Guibo towards me, towards the Taxpayers Federation, towards the Toronto
00:19:00.820 Sun. Because we're losing that ability to bridge that gap. And so, I would recommend anyone who's
00:19:09.300 lived the laptop life for a long, long time in downtown urban course, get out. Go out. Like,
00:19:16.260 honestly, go out of your urban core. Rent a car if you have to. Go hang out in a small town. Not a
00:19:23.460 little tourist trap. An actual small working town for a week. Get to understand what those folks are
00:19:28.980 like. Same thing for my family who has always lived rural or always had, you know, that kind of working
00:19:36.100 class lifestyle. Go downtown. Take transit. Go to really nice museums. Get to understand how those folks
00:19:44.420 live. And I think that would help a lot. I think sometimes that the folks who are in the laptop
00:19:50.580 class, so to speak, can forget where, you know, the milk for their latte in the morning or their ice
00:19:56.820 cream in the afternoon comes from. It comes from a dairy cow. The dairy cow was hauled to its dairy farm,
00:20:02.580 probably as a calf, using a truck. The dairy cow eats alfalfa. That hay was hauled to that barn
00:20:08.900 using a truck. Everything you eat and use was brought to you on a truck, quite often including
00:20:16.180 a pickup truck by somebody within 100 kilometres of where you're sitting. And so I think it's important,
00:20:22.900 especially when a government is talking about imposing a big new tax like this, to turn around
00:20:28.100 and understand how that would affect average people, including those who are trying to help bring you
00:20:33.700 stuff that you need. Well, certainly politicians and journalists like Erin Weary, who claim to
00:20:39.780 speak for and represent a broad swath of the country, I think would be very wise to follow
00:20:46.900 that advice. And I have a feeling that's something that they don't do often enough. And I think you're
00:20:52.020 absolutely right. I did want to ask you about the carbon tax, because I know that's something that
00:20:57.380 the Canadian Taxpayers Federation has been very vocal about. Now, we know that the parliamentary
00:21:02.340 budget office in Ottawa recently rebuked a Trudeau government claim, which was that everyone was
00:21:09.140 going to be better off from the carbon tax, that it was actually going to help put more money in
00:21:14.340 the pockets of Canadian families. That turned out to be entirely nonsense, despite the fact that I'm 0.58
00:21:19.940 sure Erin Weary and plenty of the fact checkers over at the CBC and legacy media were quick to call
00:21:26.100 conservatives disinformation by claiming that the carbon tax was a tax that would take money out of your
00:21:31.860 pocket, not put money in your pocket. But I'm wondering if you could walk us through what the
00:21:37.540 what that report said. And what's your position on the carbon tax? What do you think needs to be done
00:21:42.500 with it at this point? Ash heap of history, as Margaret Thatcher put it, it needs to be completely 0.87
00:21:49.060 gone. Both of them, the one that we have right now federally, and the second one that Prime Minister
00:21:54.420 Trudeau is planning for the rest of Canada outside of BC, just in time for Christmas, which is also going to
00:22:00.100 increase the cost of diesel and gas at the gas pumps. So that needs to be gone, like lickety split.
00:22:06.100 I found it really interesting that the parliamentary budget officer went through and did this work,
00:22:11.460 and kudos to them. And yeah, turns out, it actually, you don't get more back than you pay in.
00:22:17.780 And let's just stop for a second and think about what a silly statement that is. You'll get more back in
00:22:23.300 tax than you pay in. Well, government does not have a magical money appreciation tree in its courtyard.
00:22:32.340 When you put money into government, it does not magically earn wealth and give you more back. The
00:22:38.580 very idea that you would get more back than you pay in is silly, because the only money that government
00:22:43.860 uses is your money. It's tax dollars. So on the very surface of it, that didn't make any sense. But okay,
00:22:50.660 let's just go along with this magical thinking. Turns out, yeah, the average family in Canada is not
00:22:57.220 going to get more back than they pay in the carbon tax. And folks in Alberta are going to get kicked
00:23:02.980 the hardest. I think last I checked, it was something like $1,000, $1,200 a year, you know, net that they
00:23:09.380 would be out. Further to that, there is so much expense connected to the carbon tax that it's
00:23:15.780 almost impossible to perfectly quantify. Because if you think about it, like we said, look around
00:23:21.300 wherever you are right now, everything you eat and use was brought to you on a truck, most likely that
00:23:27.220 was using gas and then diesel. And if it was trained to you on a railroad, that's also using diesel,
00:23:35.060 if it was shipped to you that is using oil and gas. So it really trickles down that way. So that
00:23:41.300 everything you use that has a carbon tax attached to it to bring it to you is going to be more
00:23:46.100 expensive because of the carbon tax. Further, farmers actually have to pay the carbon tax in one way.
00:23:53.140 And that is when they dry their product. A lot of folks don't know this, but with they've got their
00:23:57.620 grain or their seeds or whatever they're using, they usually use natural gas and sometimes propane to
00:24:04.420 dry it. That actually is nailed with the carbon tax. And I didn't even know that before I started at
00:24:10.020 the CTF. And that adds a lot of cost because of course everything uses grain. Even if you're a
00:24:15.700 carnivore like Dr. Jordan Peterson, the cow that you're eating did eat grain. And so that cost is
00:24:22.740 up there. So basically the carbon tax punishes people for driving to work, moving around the country
00:24:29.060 and heating your home. Those demands, like getting to work and heating your home are inelastic,
00:24:36.420 meaning people just can't opt out. It's not like picking paper or plastic bags at the grocery store.
00:24:41.220 You can't opt out. You don't want to freeze to death. You don't want your pipes to burst and you
00:24:44.900 got to get to work to buy food. So the carbon tax is just a punishment for people's everyday existence
00:24:50.580 in Canada. And so it was good to see the parliamentary budget officer back up what we'd been saying all this
00:24:56.420 time that, yeah, sorry guys, you're not going to get more than you pay in. And I just wanted to put
00:25:01.140 out a word of warning because I'm here in British Columbia and we've always been the canary in the
00:25:06.340 coal mine, so to speak, for the carbon tax. We have the highest carbon taxes in all of North America.
00:25:12.580 Right now in British Columbia, it's about 28 cents a liter for gasoline just in our two carbon taxes.
00:25:21.300 And what's interesting is our so-called rebate absolutely cuts off by the time a two-person
00:25:27.700 working family hits $58,000 a year. The average two-person working family, so your average working
00:25:34.820 people that politicians love to embrace, is $84,000 a year. So it helps absolutely no average working
00:25:43.540 people in British Columbia. The rebate does not exist. And when we were first sold this bill of goods in 2008,
00:25:50.580 the BC Liberals told us all sorts of stuff. It was just a bunch of magic beans. They said it was
00:25:55.140 going to be revenue neutral, that it would create a whole bunch of alternative energies that would
00:25:59.860 be affordable, and that it would reduce emissions. Today, none of those things is true. Our emissions
00:26:05.540 keep on going up in BC, even though we have the highest carbon tax in Canada. So it's a huge failure,
00:26:10.580 and it's really expensive, and average people pay through the nose for it. So we really need to see
00:26:14.900 this thing gone.
00:26:15.620 Right. And again, where is Erin Weary to report on that? Because Canada's emissions have also gone
00:26:20.500 up since 2015. I think they're up 10 percent, and we don't see that. It's interesting to hear you go
00:26:25.620 through all the various ways that these taxes hurt working people, hurt middle class people. I remember
00:26:31.540 Dustin Trudeau came in, and his whole platform was helping the middle class and those hoping to join it.
00:26:36.900 That seems to be completely out the window. When I was researching for this interview, Chris,
00:26:41.140 I found it kind of amusing. Here you have your report. Pickup trucks are going to get taxed an
00:26:46.260 additional $1,000 to $4,000 based on the truck, in addition to the carbon tax, which you just went
00:26:50.660 through how punitive and expensive it is, and all the other taxes that are aimed at middle class
00:26:54.980 people. At the same time, the government continues to subsidize electric vehicles like Tesla's.
00:27:00.980 Tesla's are an incredibly expensive luxury vehicle, and yet here we have federally up to a $5,000
00:27:07.860 rebate for a long-range battery. In Ontario, they offer $1,000 for the purchase of a fully electric
00:27:15.060 car, $1,000 for a plug-in. In Quebec, up to $8,000 for an electric vehicle, under $60,000.
00:27:22.660 It's this bizarre scenario where you have the government subsidizing rich people. Rich people
00:27:28.340 drive Tesla's. Tesla's are incredibly nice, incredibly expensive. So the government's incentivizing
00:27:34.100 and subsidizing rich people and increasing taxes on the working poor, working class, middle class
00:27:39.700 people. What kind of bizarre world do we live in? It is bizarre. That's the right term. And again,
00:27:45.460 a reminder, this is not free government money that is coming to these folks. Every nickel of that came
00:27:50.980 from themselves or their neighbors or their entire neighborhood, depending on how much of a rebate
00:27:55.540 they're getting back. So it isn't just some magic thing that the government can write off. That is not
00:28:00.340 how this works. It's money in, money out. That's how this functions. And they're increasing the deficit
00:28:06.980 hand over fist. And it's one of the reasons why our inflation is so crazy right now. Yes, there are
00:28:12.820 other global factors that can affect inflation. But as our federal director, Franco Terrazzano,
00:28:17.620 has explained very well, one of the big bolsters of our deficit is, or our inflation, is our deficit
00:28:24.740 spending. Because they'll go into deficit, and then the Bank of Canada, on the other hand,
00:28:28.740 prints more money in order to cover the deficit. And so that causes extra inflation. And so if folks
00:28:34.580 are worried about butter going up, and pork going up, and chicken going up, and all of that, one of
00:28:41.140 the reasons for that is because of the freewheeling spending of this government. And so it's really
00:28:47.060 important right now. I know it's tough out there. I get calls every week. I got a call a few weeks ago
00:28:52.740 from a lady who was beside herself, her adult son, who just got his life back on track after he broke up
00:28:58.340 with his wife as a tradesperson. They lived together in a basement suite in Chilliwack. And he couldn't
00:29:03.380 afford to drive his truck from Chilliwack up and over to Maple Ridge, which is a pretty long commute,
00:29:09.380 because it's two bucks a litre right now. In the Vancouver area, it's $2 a litre. It's just these are
00:29:16.020 real people really suffering. And it's high time for government to pay attention. And one of the big factors in
00:29:22.340 that is one, the overspending, right, by the Trudeau government, and two, carbon taxes. And I don't like
00:29:28.340 to be the bearer of bad news, but the carbon tax element is going to get way worse. They're cranking
00:29:33.860 this thing up to $170 a ton within the next eight years. What that means is it's going to cost you
00:29:41.060 about $40 extra just in that one carbon tax to fill up a minivan. Like every single time. You know,
00:29:50.420 that is a full turkey dinner with all the fixings for a family, every time they're filling up. And
00:29:56.180 it's not helping. Emissions keep on going up. So this is real money we're talking about. And it's
00:30:01.540 causing hardship for working people. Well, absolutely. And the inflation tax, I mean,
00:30:06.180 it's directly related to government policy, because they're the ones printing money. And sure,
00:30:09.620 it's happening all over the world, because governments all over the world are printing money
00:30:12.500 like madmen because of COVID. So thanks for making that point, because it is it's hard if you're on a fixed
00:30:18.340 income, if you are on a limited budget, and all of a sudden, you know, everything's 10% more
00:30:22.340 expensive than it was last year. Plus, you have all these taxes plus $2 a liter gasoline out west.
00:30:27.300 It's it's it's tough. And Canadians really need to stand up to this Trudeau government. Our media is
00:30:33.060 not going to do it. We know that. So I just wanted to quickly point out, there was a stat,
00:30:37.540 sorry to interrupt. There's a stat that I check every now and then. And I think it's for the first time
00:30:41.860 ever. MNP puts out a report basically asking how are you financially. And for the first time ever
00:30:47.620 that I noticed might have been different before more than more than half more than half of Canadians
00:30:52.660 say they're within 200 bucks of insolvency, which means every month, they're within 200 bucks of not
00:30:58.980 being able to cover their basic bills. And usually it's a scary amount, it's hovering between 35 and
00:31:05.060 maybe even 40% when I would check it now with I think it's 52%. So we're in some serious trouble here.
00:31:12.180 Yeah, this is the economy that Justin Trudeau creates, you know, he said that he wants to
00:31:16.020 grow the economy from the heart out or whatever he said that budgets will balance themselves. Well,
00:31:20.100 this is the reality. And it's scary. I know True North reports on those kind of stories and how close
00:31:25.140 so many families are. It's it's so tough. So Chris, we really appreciate all you do to bring these
00:31:30.340 important stories to light. All of the research you do out west. Thank you so much for joining the show.
00:31:36.340 Hopefully we'll have you on more often. You bet. Thanks for having us.
00:31:38.980 All right. That's Chris Sims. I'm Candace Malcolm. And this is The Candace Malcolm Show.