ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- July 09, 2024
Reality Check: Why is housing unaffordable? Too much government
Episode Stats
Length
19 minutes
Words per Minute
178.20528
Word Count
3,517
Sentence Count
180
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
00:00:00.000
I'm Jasmine Moulton and it's time for Reality Check.
00:00:10.560
Reality Check is a new True North podcast that uses facts and logic to debunk the favorite
00:00:15.300
arguments of the left. Here's how today's show will roll out. We'll play clips of the leftists
00:00:19.540
making these arguments, then we'll equip you with the facts that you need to debunk these arguments
00:00:23.680
when you hear them in common conversation. At the end, we'll give a quick recap. Today,
00:00:28.240
we'll be discussing the housing affordability crisis in Canada. But before we get into the
00:00:32.440
leftist clips on this issue, let's just do a brief overview of the housing affordability crisis in
00:00:37.460
Canada, just so we're all on the same page. When I'm talking about housing affordability,
00:00:41.300
I'm using the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation, CMHC's definition, which is this.
00:00:47.300
A house is considered affordable when it costs 30% or less than a household's pre-tax income.
00:00:53.380
Those costs include your mortgage, your interest payments, and any sort of bills associated with
00:00:57.900
the house. Now here's where we get into trouble. RBC Economics released a housing report in June
00:01:02.860
and its aggregate affordability measure for Canada surged to 54% in the first quarter of 2022
00:01:09.440
and they called that the worst level of affordability since the 1990s. The report also notes that,
00:01:16.480
quote, the Bank of Canada's forceful interest rate hiking campaign will further inflate ownership
00:01:22.020
costs in the near term, putting RBC's national affordability measure on a path to worst ever
00:01:28.020
levels. The report found that Vancouver and Toronto are the worst housing markets for affordability in
00:01:33.600
Canada. The report noted that housing affordability in Vancouver is now at 111% for a single detached
00:01:41.300
home, meaning the median pre-tax income per household in Vancouver isn't even enough to cover the cost of
00:01:47.300
housing. Perhaps even more alarming, the report found that a one percentage point rate increase in
00:01:52.820
interest rates raises mortgage payments by more than $600 per month in Vancouver and 554 in Toronto.
00:02:01.860
The report went on to note, in March, the Bank of Canada initiated a hiking cycle that we expect
00:02:07.620
will culminate in a 250 basis point increase in its policy rate by the fall. As of June, half of that
00:02:14.620
is still to come. Overall, the RBC economics report emphasized that Canadians are facing the worst
00:02:20.780
housing affordability crisis in a generation. While everybody in Canada agrees that housing
00:02:25.340
affordability is an issue, not everybody agrees on the solution. Take a listen.
00:02:30.300
One of the initiatives we're working on, $4 billion towards municipalities in order to double the
00:02:36.060
construction of new housing over the coming years. This is something that is going to help,
00:02:41.500
whether it's enough or directly going to be helping your son. We'll have to see because there's not
00:02:47.660
just one program that's going to help anyone. There's going to be a range of programs from
00:02:52.060
programs of renting to own that we've launched as well in this budget, from programs that are helping
00:02:58.380
the first-time home buyers with increased incentives and reduction in their mortgage costs, initiatives to
00:03:06.380
build greater density, particularly around public transit that are going to allow people to get
00:03:11.340
into the housing market with their first starter condo, starter home. These are the kinds of things
00:03:17.100
that get people's toes in the door. We know that young people need to be able to
00:03:24.700
build the stable base with which they want to start a family, give their future kids the kinds of
00:03:30.300
opportunities that their parents worked hard to give them. And that's what this budget and this focus
00:03:36.540
of the government is on right now. But it's not going to be easy. It's going to take a number of years
00:03:42.220
and anyone who's promising that they have a quick fix for it is not being straight with Canadians.
00:03:47.740
It's going to take all of us working together to curb foreign speculation, to make sure that market is
00:03:53.420
fairer, to create more housing units and offer and to support families being able to save up to do that.
00:04:00.060
And that's very much what we're focused on. For our audio only listeners, that was Prime Minister
00:04:04.780
Justin Trudeau. He was listing off his government solutions to fix this housing affordability issue
00:04:10.380
in Canada. Now, I heard a lot of big government approach, more spending, more taxes, more regulation,
00:04:17.020
etc. But to give credit where credit's due, there were some elements like a tax-free saving account
00:04:22.140
for first-time home buyers that were not big government solutions. But overall, it's clear
00:04:26.780
that the Liberal government's approach to fix this housing affordability crisis in Canada is more
00:04:32.220
government. When it comes to Canada's housing affordability issue, leftists will always say
00:04:36.380
that more government is a solution, more government regulation, more government spending or social
00:04:40.620
programs, more taxes. But the reality is, too much government is the reason there's a housing
00:04:46.620
affordability crisis in this country. As with any market, Canada's housing market relies on the
00:04:51.660
basic economic principles of supply and demand. Supply is not kept up with the increases in demand,
00:04:57.820
hence the upward price pressure on housing in Canada. But governments in Canada at all three
00:05:02.540
levels, municipal, provincial, and federal, exacerbate this issue in three main ways.
00:05:07.580
One, they restrict the supply of housing. Two, they increase the demand for housing. And three,
00:05:11.820
they add taxes and fees that make housing more expensive. So let's start off with the first way
00:05:15.900
that governments make housing in Canada more expensive, by restricting supply. Governments,
00:05:19.900
specifically at the municipal and provincial level, could speed up the supply of new housing if they
00:05:24.780
acted promptly and reasonably on zoning matters. Unfortunately, that's too often not the case.
00:05:30.620
In my home province of Ontario, for example, there's upwards of a seven-year waiting list by the time
00:05:36.460
developers purchase a plot of land to the time they can even get shovels in the ground. Seven or more
00:05:41.420
years! Imagine purchasing a piece of land and having to pay the taxes on it and just hold that capital
00:05:46.300
in the land for close to a decade. Of course, housing is going to be expensive when it's that
00:05:51.020
capital intensive. And during that time, the cost of labour and housing materials all goes up. It is
00:05:56.460
simply unacceptable that municipal and provincial governments are so incompetent that it takes close
00:06:01.500
to a decade to start building new homes in this province. Hundreds of thousands of new homes are being
00:06:06.380
held up because of this across the province. And Ontario's former Liberal Premier Kathleen Wynne does
00:06:11.980
not deserve credit on this front because she and her government actually dismantled the Ontario
00:06:16.780
Municipal Board, which was in charge of speeding up the approvals process. Now instead, many of these
00:06:23.180
zoning and appeals processes go back to big city councils that are bureaucratic and not quick at all
00:06:29.420
in their approvals process. Zoning and regulatory issues really do lie at the heart of this supply issue
00:06:34.460
in the housing affordability crisis in Canada. Big city councils are debating every minor issue and
00:06:39.340
they're also subjected to various requests and demands from these NIMBY or not in my backyard
00:06:45.340
special interest groups and all of this compounds to delay and delay and delay new home builds. If you
00:06:51.580
consider for example the city of Toronto, it's less than half as dense as the city of New York. But if we
00:06:57.900
switch from buying homes to looking at renting, governments also impose delays on the supply of new
00:07:04.060
rental units as well. One main way that they deter investment into purpose-built rentals is by
00:07:09.980
threatening policies such as rent control. Take a listen. That's why today I am so delighted to be
00:07:15.820
standing here in Scarborough Agent Court with Sue and Manal and Mitzi to announce that an Ontario
00:07:20.860
Liberal government would reinstate rent control all across this province on every property on every building.
00:07:27.580
We know again that right here in Scarborough and elsewhere that rents continue to go up because of
00:07:37.260
the inaction, because Doug Ford has chosen to side with the speculators instead of with tenants and
00:07:43.660
everyday hard-working families. In addition to bringing back real rent control across the board,
00:07:49.020
Ontario Liberals will also make sure that more resources are provided to help deal with enforcement
00:07:55.340
for bad actors in this industry. We'll bring forward more resources to clear the backlog in terms of
00:08:01.020
landlord and tenant relations and the back and forth that occurs there. And we're going to help to
00:08:06.380
provide a sensible and responsible legal framework for tenants and for owners who want to engage in a
00:08:13.580
rent-to-own framework going forward. Now for our audio-only listeners, that was Stephen Del Duca. He was the
00:08:19.420
former Liberal leader in Ontario in provincial politics and he's talking there about rent control.
00:08:25.020
Economist Asar Lindbeck described rent control as the most efficient technique presently known to
00:08:30.620
destroy a city, except for bombing, and Lindbeck could not be more accurate. It's a well-known fact
00:08:35.980
that rent control discourages investment into purpose-built rentals. The reason for this is
00:08:40.700
obvious. If you were an investor looking to get a return on your investment, why would you ever park your
00:08:46.700
money where the government's going to regulate the amount of profit that you can make and in some cases
00:08:51.580
limit it altogether? The issue of rent control really does deserve its own dedicated podcast
00:08:56.860
because it's something that the left returns to. They go back and back after every election. It seems
00:09:01.100
to come into fashion, but it really is a terrible idea that has been proven to be ineffective time and
00:09:06.780
time again. This kind of harmful rhetoric from our political leaders such as Stephen Del Duca can have
00:09:11.660
a lasting impact sending shockwaves through the investment industry. So instead of scaring investors away from
00:09:17.180
the prospect of purpose-built rentals, governments could do a lot to instead incentivize them. For example,
00:09:22.940
if they reduce development charges and taxes on purpose-built rentals, I'm sure that would catch a lot of
00:09:27.820
investors' attention. And as we've already mentioned, increasing supply tends to have a downward price
00:09:32.060
pressure on rental unit costs. As RBC Economics noted, when rental vacancy rates go below 3% in a city,
00:09:40.220
that's when the cost of rent starts to go up. As a quick recap, governments in Canada restrict the
00:09:45.180
supply of housing in three ways. One, through a lengthy zoning process and regulatory delays.
00:09:50.540
Two, through large city councils that are susceptible to NIMBY special interests. And
00:09:55.180
three, by threatening policy changes such as rent control that deter development.
00:10:00.460
All right, let's move on to the next way that the government exacerbates the housing affordability
00:10:04.860
crisis in Canada, and that is by increasing demand. Canada's population is rapidly growing.
00:10:10.780
It's growing the fastest in the G7, and it's growing at twice the rate that the US population is growing.
00:10:16.220
According to data from the Smart Prosperity Institute, since 2016, after Trudeau came to power
00:10:21.500
and started boosting immigration, the province of Ontario has seen 414,000 new households formed,
00:10:28.380
but built only 349,000 new homes for them. Now, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that
00:10:34.700
if you're increasing the number of people who need a home, the demand for home goes up, but you're not
00:10:39.740
increasing the supply at the same rate, clearly demand has outstripped supply and you're going to
00:10:44.540
have upward price pressure. But to be clear for all those listening to the show, this is not an
00:10:49.100
argument against immigration, but it is an argument against irresponsible government policies that ignore
00:10:54.540
the supply side of the housing issue and exacerbate it by increasing the demand. Now, let's get to the
00:10:59.820
third way that governments at all levels across the country increase the cost of housing, therefore
00:11:04.780
exacerbating the affordability crisis, and that is through taxes and fees. Now, every single politician
00:11:11.260
in Canada at every single level of government talks about the housing affordability crisis. They talk
00:11:17.500
about how terrible it is, how sad it is that children, the next generation can't afford to buy homes,
00:11:24.380
especially in the neighbourhoods where they grew up. But at the same time, these same politicians are
00:11:29.100
charging outrageous fees and taxes on homes in their communities. For example, the Building Industry
00:11:35.980
and Land Association found that some development charges in the GTA, the Greater Toronto Area, had
00:11:41.340
increased by up to 878% since 2004. That adds a cost of $164,000 per condo unit in Toronto. If municipal
00:11:53.260
politicians were actually concerned about housing affordability in their jurisdictions, they'd have a lot
00:11:57.980
of tools at their disposal, they could reduce development charges, they could reduce property taxes,
00:12:03.340
but you don't see that happening anywhere. And there's good reason for that. The housing industry really
00:12:07.980
is politicians own personal ATM. And these taxes and fees are no small sum. Consider property taxes in the
00:12:15.100
biggest city in the province that I live in, for example, Toronto. The average selling price for a single
00:12:19.820
detached home in Toronto right now is around $1.6 million. If you look at the property tax rate in Toronto,
00:12:26.860
on that average single detached home price, you'd be paying over $10,000 a year in property taxes.
00:12:33.420
That's a lot of money. And Toronto is the only city in Ontario that charges double land transfer tax. So
00:12:39.900
if you move anywhere else in Ontario, you'd pay land transfer tax once to the province, but Toronto
00:12:45.180
arbitrarily has doubled that amount. So for example, if we consider this $1.6 million single detached
00:12:51.420
average home sale price in Toronto, the amount of land transfer tax that you'd pay adds up quick.
00:12:56.620
You'd pay about $28,500 to the province, you'd pay about $28,500 to the city, and quickly that adds up
00:13:04.220
to $57,000. It should be clear to everybody listening that by now, governments are a lot more concerned
00:13:10.540
about their own revenues than they are about housing affordability. But politicians love to distract from
00:13:15.020
this fact by scapegoating foreign buyers. So let's take an honest look at this claim that foreign buyers
00:13:21.100
are the culprits behind the Canadian housing affordability crisis. Consider this. Ontario's
00:13:26.460
non-resident speculation tax collected a meager 156 payments in Toronto in the first quarter of 2019,
00:13:33.500
while the city expects to grow by 41,000 people per year. So it becomes evident quite quickly that
00:13:39.820
at best foreign buyers are a drop in the bucket. They are not a significant driver of prices in the
00:13:46.620
Canadian housing market. If they were, the two hottest housing markets in the country,
00:13:51.260
both Vancouver and Toronto, would have cooled after both places respectively introduced their own foreign
00:13:56.300
buyers tax. What happened instead was that both markets kind of paused, figured out what sort of
00:14:02.860
impact that would have, and then they carried on as per usual. These taxes have not had an impact
00:14:07.900
because foreign buyers are not truly the main cause or the main culprit or even a significant one
00:14:13.820
behind the cost of housing in Canada. The Canadian government doesn't even track the total number
00:14:18.380
of foreign buyers. So it's odd to hear all of these federal politicians across the political spectrum
00:14:24.060
scapegoating foreign buyers as the problem behind the Canadian housing market affordability crisis,
00:14:29.580
because they don't even know how many there are. Nobody does. We're not tracking it. But let's just
00:14:33.900
pretend for a moment that there are even a handful of these foreign buyers in the Vancouver and Toronto
00:14:39.740
markets. As we saw in Toronto, the amount of property tax that you would pay on the average single detached
00:14:46.860
home is over $10,000 a year. So if it is the case that there's a foreign buyer who has purchased a unit
00:14:53.340
or a home, left it vacant, they're still paying property taxes on that property, but they're not consuming
00:14:59.180
any of the services. So if anything, they're contributing $10,000 in taxes without draining
00:15:04.940
the system. My point is that this foreign buyer issue is marginal at best, very much overblown by
00:15:11.180
politicians who are looking to cover their own tracks and culpability in the housing affordability
00:15:15.500
crisis. Ultimately, it wouldn't matter if foreign buyers were buying these units if there wasn't a
00:15:20.700
shortage of supply. And as we've already pointed out, it's the government's fault that they're suffocating
00:15:25.580
supply in this country. Next up, let's talk affordable housing. Leftist politicians are
00:15:30.220
obsessed with affordable housing as a solution to Canada's unaffordable housing market. Take a listen.
00:15:36.220
It hasn't been treated like the crisis it is. So what we're proposing is some concrete steps.
00:15:41.580
Let's massively invest in housing as a way to create jobs locally in communities and as a way to ensure
00:15:48.700
people have a place to call home. We want to see people have a place they can buy. We want to make
00:15:53.980
sure that there's affordable rental. And so what we're proposing is investing massively to create
00:15:58.300
half a million new homes, investing in cooperatives, in not-for-profits, building apartments, building
00:16:03.740
townhouses, building houses. We want to build massively as a way to recover out of this pandemic
00:16:09.660
and a way to build forward for the future. For our audio-only listeners, that was federal NDP leader
00:16:14.780
Jagmeet Singh talking about affordable housing in Canada. But he's not the only one who thinks that
00:16:19.980
this is a solution to the housing affordability crisis. Under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau,
00:16:24.300
the Liberal plan also includes spending, and I quote, $2.7 billion over four years to build and
00:16:30.540
preserve more affordable housing. But the problem is the government doesn't have money to pay for this.
00:16:36.220
Either we're going to have to increase current taxes, or we're going to have to add this onto the
00:16:41.500
national credit card and ask taxpayers to pick up the tab plus interest down the line. Obviously,
00:16:47.020
either of these scenarios would exacerbate affordability in Canada. And just as a reminder,
00:16:51.340
adding a tab to our future credit card bill really is not a good idea because Justin Trudeau has been
00:16:56.540
doing that since the moment he got into office. He's already doubled the debt, the country's national
00:17:01.180
debt has already surpassed $1 trillion, and he adds over $144 million to the debt every single day.
00:17:09.020
So remember at the beginning of the podcast when we read that clip from RBC Economics that said
00:17:14.220
inflation is spurring a rate hike that should worry everybody? Yeah, Justin Trudeau's spending
00:17:19.020
has a lot to do with that. What causes inflation? Government spending. In a nutshell, inflation went
00:17:23.980
through the roof following COVID because during COVID, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government spent
00:17:29.180
well beyond its means historic levels of spending. Long story short, the Bank of Canada facilitated that
00:17:34.620
spending spree by printing money. When there's more money in circulation without the economic growth to
00:17:39.260
justify it, that's when inflation occurs. Now the main way that the Bank of Canada can curb
00:17:43.740
inflation is through raising interest rates. And while this tool may be good at curbing inflation,
00:17:47.980
it has other downsides as well. Obviously it will add fuel to the fire of the affordability crisis
00:17:52.860
in Canada's housing market. And as you'll recall from the beginning of the show, RBC Economics stated that
00:17:58.140
a one percentage point rate increase raises mortgage payments by more than $600 per month in Vancouver
00:18:04.700
and $554 per month in Toronto. So while the federal government loves to say that they really are
00:18:11.020
invested in this housing affordability crisis and they really care, clearly you have them to thank
00:18:16.540
for your increased mortgage interest payment every month. So let's do a quick recap. Leftists love to
00:18:21.500
say that more government spending and more government programs are required in order to combat the
00:18:26.220
increasing affordability crisis in Canada's housing market. This is obviously false and here's how you
00:18:31.020
counter that argument. Number one, identify that government at all levels in Canada, municipal, provincial,
00:18:35.980
and federal. Government is the reason that housing is unaffordable in this country. And number two,
00:18:40.460
explain that government drives up the cost of housing in three ways. One, by suffocating supply,
00:18:44.860
two, by exacerbating demand, and three, by imposing hefty taxes and charges on new developments.
00:18:50.060
So here's a reality check. Canadian politicians are trying to distract from their own role in the
00:18:55.340
housing affordability crisis by scapegoating foreign buyers, for example. But they are the reason,
00:19:01.740
the government, government at all levels in this country is the reason that there's a housing
00:19:06.060
affordability crisis in Canada. The solution is more supply, not more spending, not more government,
00:19:11.580
not more bureaucracy. We don't need more government. We need government to get out of the way.
00:19:15.820
We need more homes. That's our show this week. Thank you for listening. If you liked what you heard,
00:19:19.980
please subscribe to our YouTube channel, share the show with your friends. If you follow us on wherever
00:19:25.020
you get your podcasts, please give us a five star review so others like you can find the show.
00:19:29.900
Thanks for listening. I'm Jasmine Moulton, and this is Reality Check.
Link copied!