Juno News - February 24, 2022Russia declares war on Ukraine – is this Canada's fight？
Episode Stats
Harmful content
Misogyny
1
sentences flagged
Hate speech
19
sentences flagged
Summary
In this live edition of The Andrew Lawton Show, Andrew talks with Yaroslav Baran of the Ukrainian-Canadian Congress about the recent Russian invasion of Ukraine, and what it means for Canada and the rest of the world.
Transcript
00:00:02.920
This is The Andrew Lawton Show, brought to you by True North.
00:00:11.720
Hello and welcome to another live edition of The Andrew Lawton Show here on True North.
00:00:18.100
I said when we started doing these shows live a couple of weeks ago,
00:00:21.920
it was that news was happening at such a pace that pre-recording just didn't make sense.
00:00:26.240
And also it's been a lot more fun to do them live.
00:00:28.440
this is not a fun subject by any stretch but certainly one that fits into that category
00:00:33.680
of evolving and changing by the not even by the minute but by the second so i'm very glad that
00:00:40.060
we have the opportunity to come to you live it's a very big day today as we talk about the invasion
00:00:46.100
which is the only way to describe it of ukraine by russia now this for a lot of people i think
00:00:51.800
was something that they imagined in the weeks previous the weeks leading up to this was just
00:00:57.040
brinksmanship and idle threats. And a lot of people saying, okay, is this actually going to
00:01:01.620
happen? Well, it has. And we've already seen the footage. This is not just tiptoeing across the
00:01:06.420
border. There have been assaults on multiple fronts in multiple parts of the country,
00:01:11.040
civilians that are being targeted by this, apartment buildings. And I want to talk about
00:01:15.440
what's happening, why it's happening, and also what it means for Canada. And to do this, I want
00:01:21.140
to welcome in someone who I know is very busy and has been on the phone and emailing all day.
00:01:25.220
And that is Yaroslav Baran of the Ukrainian-Canadian Congress, also a geopolitics commentator.
00:01:32.580
Yaroslav, thank you for being with us today. I appreciate it very much.
00:01:37.580
Now, I know you're obviously coming to this from the perspective, which I think most of the West is, of just looking after the Ukrainian people.
00:01:45.020
And I know the Ukrainian-Canadian Congress has already done a lot to mobilize for humanitarian support.
00:01:50.500
And we'll talk about that very shortly. But I want to go back to first principles here and address the why, because I know Putin's motivations for doing this have been, in a lot of cases, distilled into this idea of, you know, someone who's never quite accepted that the age of the Russian Empire is over and that the Soviet Union is over and really trying to go back to that czarist Russian empirical ambition. Is that what this is? Is there something else that Russia is trying to get out of this?
00:02:20.980
This is like the final gasps of activism of a dying empire, but they are very dangerous
00:02:31.180
I mean, we could characterize it as an attempt to restore the Russian empire greatness or
00:02:37.580
the Tsarist greatness, but it actually goes a little bit deeper than that.
00:02:41.040
Putin belongs to a school of thought, a school of revisionist history that in order to make
00:02:49.860
their myths work, they need to appropriate Ukrainian history.
00:02:58.820
Its history goes back hundreds of years earlier, but through that earlier medieval Kievan Ukrainian
00:03:06.380
state that was one of the largest countries in Europe. It had strong ties to Byzantium and Rome
00:03:12.080
and Constantinople and all that kind of stuff. A lot of rich legacy that was later appropriated
00:03:18.940
by the Tsars who called themselves like the new Caesars. So they had to draw that connection
0.87
00:03:24.140
through Ukraine in order to create these myths about their God-given right to govern and greatness
00:03:33.620
So he, for like spiritual and mythology reasons,
0.85
00:03:40.000
because otherwise their whole myth doesn't work.
00:03:46.320
It's not a question of we need their natural gas
00:03:51.260
you know, some, you know, insert resource here.
00:03:54.340
It's deeper, it's more zealous, it's ideological.
00:03:57.700
and that makes it a heck of a lot more dangerous yeah and i think that's an important point because
00:04:03.920
if there is a strategic goal there if it were for oil or if it were for a geographic advantage you
00:04:10.180
you can better approach it i mean it's like when we see with terrorism with fundamentalism of
00:04:15.780
yeah you can't go up against ideology because you can't out reason them you can't you can't
00:04:22.880
even necessarily combat it but but at the same time there are also a lot of people and we're
00:04:26.760
seeing this particularly with NATO, that are not looking at this as a global issue, that are not
00:04:32.180
looking at it as their responsibility. They're saying, yeah, this is just, our goal is containment
00:04:36.440
to keep this within Ukraine. Well, sure, maybe that's helpful if you're Estonia, if you're
0.99
00:04:40.760
Latvia, if you're Belarus, but that's not particularly helpful if you're Ukrainian.
0.92
00:04:45.500
Yeah, you're exactly right. Because that, I mean, taking that approach essentially means that
1.00
00:04:50.140
the 45 million people in Ukraine are going to be human shields or human sacrifices
00:04:56.000
to serve as a buffer of blood between Central Europe and Russia.
0.75
00:05:04.180
And I'm not sure that we're prepared to say that that's the best we can do here.
0.76
00:05:09.720
Now, you're right in a sense in saying that NATO does not have an obligation to step in.
00:05:17.780
Now, the eastern members of NATO, Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, they get it.
00:05:25.400
they know exactly what this is, this sort of attempt at rebuilding the empire. So they know
00:05:30.340
full well that they're next. So they realize that it's just a matter of time before it becomes
00:05:37.200
head-on NATO's problem. So it's a little bit simplistic to say that, well, not NATO's problem,
00:05:43.220
so go away. Let's just stick our head in the sand. And secondly, if you look beyond NATO obligations,
00:05:49.700
there are two countries in particular who actually do have a treaty obligation to step in.
00:05:55.400
And I'll just take you back in time a little bit.
00:05:59.240
When the Soviet Union broke up in 1991, overnight, Ukraine became the third biggest nuclear power in the world.
00:06:06.700
It inherited a big chunk of the Soviet nuclear arsenal.
00:06:09.360
It was nuclear power number three in the world.
00:06:17.420
So years of nonproliferation talks ensued, culminating in the 1994 Budapest Memorandum.
00:06:25.400
an international treaty by which Ukraine willingly gave up its nuclear arsenal in exchange for
00:06:32.360
security guarantees from three countries, Russia, the United States, and the United Kingdom.
0.59
00:06:39.840
I mean, the Russia part of it is a joke because Russia had an 800-year history of constantly
00:06:44.800
invading Ukraine. But still, I mean, you had to start somewhere. So the great powers, let's get
00:06:50.680
them at the table. If you guarantee your sovereignty, guarantee your security, guarantee
00:06:54.600
our territory, we will give up our nuclear arsenal. So in this case, sure, one of the parties to the
0.73
00:07:00.600
treaty is the aggressor, but the other two parties, the U.S. and the U.K., do have a treaty obligation
00:07:05.620
to step in and stop the assault against Ukraine's territorial integrity and its security.
00:07:14.660
So it is a little bit more complex than just saying it's a NATO issue. There are dimensions
00:07:20.960
beyond NATO where major powers like the US and the UK do have an actual live written treaty
00:07:28.280
obligation to step in. And by the way, even if you look beyond Ukraine, if they fail to live up
00:07:37.180
to their commitments under the Budapest memorandum, that actually imperils all future
00:07:43.820
denuclearization or non-proliferation talks. Because if you're like, I don't know, North Korea
0.81
00:07:49.360
or Iran or, you know, pick your country who's going to be in some denuclearization talk down
00:07:56.880
the line. They're going to be like, really? You want us to take your word for it, that we're
00:08:02.880
going to have some kind of international security guarantee when we give up the strongest thing we
00:08:07.660
have to protect our security and our sovereignty? Like nobody will ever believe any kind of
00:08:15.460
non-proliferation deals if the Budapest Miranda isn't lived up to.
00:08:19.060
No, I think that's an incredibly valid point, Yaroslav. And thank you for raising that.
00:08:24.020
I've seen some of the chilling footage here of fathers putting their family on buses and in cars
00:08:30.460
and staying behind to fight. The Ukrainian government has, as I understand, basically put
00:08:35.180
out that call. If you're going to stay and fight, we'll take you. This raises the question, how
00:08:40.420
prepared is Ukraine? I know you have years of a lot of Western backing and training and equipment
00:08:46.280
for Ukraine. I don't know the size of the armed forces, but how prepared logistically are they
00:08:52.180
for an attack like this? Yeah, look, I don't have the stats at my fingertips, but I mean,
00:08:58.820
Ukraine is a sizable European country. We're talking between 40 and 45 million people. It's
00:09:03.240
got a territory the size of France. But it's the second largest European country. I mean,
00:09:08.360
yeah it is it is i mean if you don't count the european part of part of russia if you look at
00:09:13.080
countries fully within europe it is the largest country in europe sure and so by european
00:09:17.880
standards it has it has a sizable armed forces now um by compared to russia it doesn't i mean
00:09:25.720
they would they're clearly outmatched by russia in in numbers and in technology and that's simply a
00:09:31.480
fact um will they put up a hell of a good fight you bet they will and even if russia succeeds in
00:09:39.160
occupying ukraine it will be really really hard for them to hold it i've seen one commentator
00:09:45.000
refer to it as the bear trying to digest the porcupine like it would not uh it would be it
00:09:51.800
would be a very difficult go so let's talk about the response further away because you're right a
00:09:58.680
a lot of the Baltic states, a lot of other states around Ukraine. In some cases, they've been down
00:10:03.500
this road before. Estonia, within the last 15 years, has seen significant Russian aggression,
00:10:08.720
in particular, as of other states like that. Further away, we saw those photos, which really
00:10:14.020
became memes a couple of weeks ago, of Canadian cabinet ministers with their little eight and a
00:10:18.840
half by 11, I stand with Ukraine signs, which is a lovely sentiment, but I don't think anyone
00:10:24.180
in Canada or in the United States or in Britain, for that matter, I've been watching a lot of UK
00:10:29.800
media today as well, is all that keen to put boots on the ground in Ukraine. So what is the support
00:10:37.420
that you would like to see from a lot of these Western states? And more practically, what do
00:10:43.260
you think is the support they're likely to send? Well, I guess I live in hope that we're going to
00:10:49.840
start to see some serious sanctions. So far, the kinds of sanctions that we've seen are the kind
00:10:54.020
you normally get in a sane environment when you're dealing with a logical actor right um when you
00:11:00.740
when you try to send a signal that for that act there will be this amount of pain and targeted
00:11:06.500
sanctions are usually where countries begin you go after the the governing class the oligarchs you
00:11:12.180
know the captains of business the people who have influence internally on the government so we've
00:11:17.460
We've seen sanctions already, like freezing the assets of, you know, cabinet ministers and key, you know, business people around Putin.
00:11:28.180
And Crimea was invaded eight years ago, and it still hasn't had an effect, those sanctions.
00:11:33.820
So far, we're seeing more of those kinds of sanctions.
00:11:38.640
To push back against an ideologically driven bully like this, the only thing they get is force, and it's got to be serious pain.
00:11:56.000
They need to be made, not made into a pariah state.
00:12:00.120
We need to respect their decisions and isolate them from the social normal order of how other
0.99
00:12:07.460
countries behave. That means do not trade with them. Do not recognize their passports when
0.99
00:12:12.580
Russians try to travel here or to London or to Paris for their shopping trips. No, sorry.
0.98
00:12:18.960
We don't accept those passports anymore. Turn around and go home. You don't accept them as
0.86
00:12:23.400
travelers. You freeze their commercial assets. You don't trade with them. And the
00:12:29.620
the biggest buttons we can push would be isolating Russia or booting them out of the international
0.87
00:12:36.840
financial e-commerce transaction systems like the Swift system, for example. So they go to swipe a
0.90
00:12:44.720
credit card or use a bank card. It doesn't work because the backbone infrastructure making all
00:12:50.460
that stuff work has just kicked them out. That's the kind of stuff that they will feel. And all of
00:12:55.520
a sudden, they're going to feel internal pressure. You may have already seen a lot of protests in
00:13:00.140
Moscow and St. Petersburg. Those protests would be 100 times as big if people's credit cards
00:13:05.020
suddenly don't work. So you think it's fair to put forward economic measures that go beyond just
00:13:12.380
targeting the specific oligarchs in the leadership class, but basically just Russian commerce as a
00:13:17.220
whole, including because individual people that have nothing to do with this are caught up in
00:13:21.320
those measures. Yeah, it's true. And that's the unfortunate thing. But with with a bully like
00:13:26.500
this, it's the only thing that they will it's the only thing that will speak to them. Having
00:13:32.080
having a mass unrest at their hands might might finally get them to reconsider. And keep in mind
00:13:39.200
too, though, like when we see things like, you know, discussions about natural gas and, you know,
00:13:44.180
Germany buying Russian natural gas, etc. Putin has been planning this for a long time. He is known
00:13:51.200
that the usual kind of sanctions are coming.
0.85
00:14:03.840
to consume whatever natural gas Russia has to sell.
00:14:19.820
as a sanction offset. Yeah. And that's the problem with a lot of, I mean, North Korea,
00:14:26.040
that's been one of the challenges with any of the measures that have been tried there. And
00:14:29.820
obviously Russia's a much different animal, much more integrated with the West and with the rest
0.57
00:14:34.500
of the world than North Korea. But China's an interesting thing to bring up here, Yaroslav,
00:14:39.880
because in China's case, we talk a lot about the Belt and Road Initiative and China's ownership of
00:14:45.720
much of the developing world. Russia doesn't have that as much, but it does have it. And I think in
00:14:51.680
a lot of ways has flown under the radar. One notable example is with vaccines. I mean, a lot
00:14:56.880
of these even smaller European countries like Albania and whatnot, they were getting a lot of
00:15:01.580
their vaccines to buy from Russia. So there is among countries small and medium, and even India.
00:15:07.940
I mean, India has been very ambiguous and almost ambivalent about this because I think India has
00:15:14.000
enjoyed its relationship with Russia. There are still a large group of countries that do have
00:15:19.360
in some way a debt to Russia, either literally or figurative, and as such, are not wanting to
00:15:25.280
get involved here. Well, yeah, you're right. That is at play here, and it's not just vaccines. I
00:15:31.140
mean, Russia has actively been building vassal states all around it. Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan,
00:15:37.420
on um belarus is a great example it's really strengthened its its position russia has really
00:15:45.700
strengthened its position as a as an overlord of belarus in the last uh in the last half year or so
00:15:50.980
and yeah so that makes a difference i mean they are and it is just the new uh incarnation of what
00:15:58.720
we used to call a you know a direct empire now it's just indirect empires by by creating dependence
00:16:03.980
on your military support, your military security, your trade, and so on.
00:16:12.760
So let me just ask you in closing here about the humanitarian aspect of this,
00:16:18.200
because war creates casualties and it isn't just the soldiers on the battlefield.
00:16:23.800
This isn't just about those eastern regions that Russia claims.
00:16:26.840
We're already seeing talk about the risk of Kiev falling.
00:16:30.840
falling so there are going to be people that are in need how is uh the ukrainian canadian congress
00:16:36.440
trying to support well the ukrainian canadian congress it's a it's a it's a peak uh association
00:16:42.920
that that uh that knits together all the other ukrainian organizations in canada um so what it
00:16:49.880
has done is is partnered with the biggest charitable foundation the ukrainian um uh
00:17:00.340
and jointly established a hub for all humanitarian giving.
00:17:18.860
You can find it through either one or the other
00:17:27.240
They don't yet know how they will need to be deployed, but they know they will be.
00:17:31.040
We will have a humanitarian crisis, whether it's a refugee crisis or whether it's blood supply or whether it's shoring up hospitals or sending doctors or whatever it may be.
00:17:41.660
There will be serious needs, and they want to be prepared to deploy as soon as those needs become apparent.
00:17:49.440
Yaroslav Baran, thank you very much for your time.
00:17:54.240
thank you that was a quite uh quite an important interview and it's again someone who knows the
00:17:59.440
situation very well who knows uh the history and the context of that because i do think the context
00:18:05.040
is important here and one thing i i would raise interestingly enough i did uh not that long ago
00:18:10.000
actually for fun a course on war and conflict and it was a year of uh not a european a university
00:18:16.640
level course which looked at through history a lot of the european battles a lot of the big global
00:18:21.200
battles. And one of the takeaways from it, and there have been numerous studies about this,
00:18:26.160
there's a big project called the, I think it's the Correlates of War Project, which literally just
00:18:30.520
tracks conflict. And the one takeaway, you can't look at the numbers without realizing
00:18:35.280
that interstate war just doesn't happen. It does in very small scales like Azerbaijan, Armenia,
00:18:43.600
but these are typically very targeted, very local. Civil wars are very common. Wars between
00:18:48.400
non-state actors and state actors, very common. But the idea of one country, World War II or World
00:18:54.980
War I style, going into another country, this is not a common thing anymore. And we can be very
00:19:00.180
grateful for that. But when this happens, and we've known it was happening, we've known it was
00:19:05.540
a risk, it raises significant questions about what the appropriate response is. And you get two
00:19:11.820
schools on this. You get the realists that say, this isn't our problem. They can just do what
00:19:16.440
they want over there. This isn't our problem. And again, that's a natural position, I think,
00:19:20.640
for a lot of Canadians and Americans to take. And then there's the position that is forming
00:19:24.760
the backbone of agreements like NATO and the UN Security Council, which say collective defense.
00:19:31.160
You attack one of us, it's like you've attacked all of us. And interestingly enough, I saw an
00:19:35.340
interview last week with, oh, who was it with? It was with a former British defense secretary. I
00:19:41.360
think Michael Portillo is his name. And he was saying that at the time, 20 years ago or so,
00:19:46.900
when he was the defense secretary and NATO was trying to, or Ukraine was trying to join NATO,
00:19:52.440
a lot of the concerns by NATO members were, we think it's likely that Ukraine is going to be
00:19:57.980
attacked by Russia. So we don't want to be in a situation where we have to take action against
00:20:04.580
Russia. Because if a NATO country is attacked, every other NATO country has an obligation
00:20:09.940
direction to defend them. It's called collective defense. And that was the concern. So this has
00:20:15.560
been known. And the question is, do we actually want to stick our necks out for Ukraine? That's
00:20:20.500
the question that's been asked by a lot of countries. And NATO's position on this is no.
00:20:25.540
If this is contained, it may well stay that way. If this starts to spill over into other areas,
00:20:30.640
that's when you may see a change taking place. Obviously, we're going to follow this. I'm going
00:20:35.080
to be perfectly candid here. I am not an expert in Russia or Ukraine. I know geopolitics. I know
00:20:40.640
international relations. I know the international institutions. But I am going to bring you guests
00:20:45.160
who know this when we talk about this. And we'll certainly have updates as this conflict goes on,
00:20:50.740
which, as we've saying, is changing by the minute here. So that's our Russia-Ukraine update for
00:20:57.500
today. I do want to change the turn the page just a little bit here. And obviously, we've had a lot
00:21:02.600
of news this past week a lot of the bank accounts in fact most of them have been unfrozen so you
00:21:08.120
may recall on tuesday we had tom marazzo who is the trucker convoy volunteer organizer we spoke to
00:21:14.460
and he said all of his bank accounts had been frozen well as of yesterday afternoon they have
00:21:19.060
been unfrozen we have justin trudeau saying the emergency is no longer so not that it changes
00:21:25.780
much in our day-to-day life because if it's a fake emergency life isn't that much different when
00:21:29.940
the emergency has been declared over, or the so-called emergency, as we've said.
00:21:34.540
But again, I would make it known and note here that we should not let Justin Trudeau off the
00:21:41.220
hook just because he's decided that the emergency is no longer a case. And these legal challenges
00:21:46.200
that we're seeing from the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, from the Canadian
00:21:50.540
Constitution Foundation, all of these things, I think, need to be continuing and will continue
00:22:03.640
about all the reasons we can't exit the pandemic
00:22:08.820
well, forget about what they say about the science.
00:22:26.420
Welcome back to The Andrew Lawton Show here on True North.
00:22:32.480
Obviously, we've been speaking for weeks, for years now about the COVID restrictions that have in many ways,
00:22:39.640
as I've said time and time again, been in some key areas far worse than the virus against which these restrictions were intended to protect,
00:22:47.800
especially as the virus has gotten weaker through the Omicron phase when some governments were insisting on adding restrictions.
00:22:55.080
Now, slowly but surely, we've seen some of these start to be lifted, notably Alberta and Saskatchewan took a very swift approach to getting rid of their vaccine passports in Ontario and Quebec and other provinces.
00:23:08.340
We have a bit of a slower uptake, but the big question here is when is the pandemic over and who gets to decide?
00:23:15.440
It's the World Health Organization that said we were in the midst of a pandemic, but do we have to wait for their cue to say it's over?
00:23:21.840
Well, a few weeks back, you may recall we spoke to Irvin Student of the Institute for 21st Century Questions, which had assembled a crack committee called the Canada Science and Policy Committee to exit the pandemic.
00:23:35.460
The focus was to figure out in concrete ways how to get Canada from the indefinite, never-ending, lockdown, permanent emergency to a place of where we want to be, which is hopefully getting rid of all of these restrictions.
00:23:51.640
The committee has, after just a few weeks, said that the pandemic is effectively over.
00:23:57.100
And let's start there, Irvin, because words matter.
00:24:00.320
And you're not saying over, you're saying effectively over.
00:24:03.160
What does that mean and how does it differ from over?
00:24:11.180
And thanks for allowing these types of interviews with proper answers about serious topics.
00:24:16.580
Andrew, the pandemic is effectively over for Canada.
00:24:20.580
We've declared it such on the Canada Science Policy Committee to exit the pandemic.
00:24:25.580
It's a similar declaration for countries like Singapore, Israel, Ireland, United Kingdom, Spain, Norway, Denmark, Netherlands, Finland.
00:24:42.580
they've determined that it is now effectively endemic which means that it has a highly seasonal
00:24:47.380
character first of all secondly that their systems are able to deal with any rises and falls of
00:24:54.180
course during seasonal variation as are ours and thirdly on a systems understanding in Canada
00:25:02.340
it is the minor problem amongst eight crises of system that are very serious in the countries all
00:25:07.380
those things combined mean that it's steady as it's full on as she goes through the systems we
00:25:13.860
exit with high energy the pandemic is over for us we are not following the science as a science
00:25:19.780
project because then you would say well a virus never ends we could be following the science
00:25:24.580
and studying covet 19 for a century and that's what happens with all historical viruses it is
00:25:30.180
a policy lead the science informs that and we're at a point both through vaccination other other
00:25:36.100
immunity other interventions and the passage of the virus the mutations at a point where we're
00:25:41.780
ready to exit quite easily across the systems that we'll discuss so that's the considered
00:25:47.060
determination across huge study and consultation by the committee over a short period of time
00:25:52.020
and we're ready to go so we presented our exit plan on the back of an endemic endemicity declaration
00:25:57.460
that we say with considerable certainty and consistent with other positions and our own
00:26:02.820
domestic circumstances. You mentioned a few moments ago, Irvin, a whole list of countries
00:26:08.000
that have done what we've been hoping for in Canada for quite some time. They've lifted
00:26:11.980
restrictions. They've declared the pandemic effectively over. And in those cases, though,
00:26:17.120
it was governments that made that declaration, governments that made a determination to lift
00:26:21.960
these restrictions. Why in Canada, and I mean no disrespect to you and your group here, but why in
00:26:27.300
Canada is it falling to a private sector group to make this declaration instead of governments
00:26:32.240
making it we're not for profit but we are doing it in some sense for the government which is
00:26:38.000
unable to make that declaration for a host of reasons both backing themselves into ideological
00:26:44.000
corners into corners of fetish into slogans uh corners on online they're just unable to say what
00:26:52.400
what is obvious to a policy community that is observing uh this both nationally and international
00:26:58.640
i should say it is a policy lead so when you say government it is not scientists that declare the
00:27:03.440
pandemic is over the scientists study and they advise but government and policy people decide
00:27:09.760
this is what we've got wrong from the ab initio at the very start in cam that we started working
00:27:14.480
in slogans follow the science or the virus is in charge nay policies in charge we study the virus
00:27:22.720
we have science advisors amongst many other advisors across the disciplines and they advise
00:27:27.920
policy people who make a determination the policy determination is that we're good to go across the
00:27:34.240
systems the science determination it is that is endemic it feeds into a policy conclusion
00:27:39.920
and we provide the choreography of exit across the systems the other countries that you've mentioned
00:27:44.720
did not collapse their systems to the same degree that we have and I'm sure we'll discuss that
00:27:49.200
which is why contrary to what we say online or what the government imagines when it says
00:27:53.440
i gotta have gut feeling that we should we should exit slowly steady she goes see what the numbers
00:27:58.880
are it has to be full on full energy not just restrictions obviously restrictions go uh
00:28:04.480
immediately and then we we will discuss that but across the other systems that have collapsed
00:28:09.120
national unity public health non-covered education the economy international the international
00:28:15.840
picture the social fabric we've collapsed those to a very very considerable degree and we so we
00:28:20.880
we can't just afford to look at COVID cases, ICU counts, all of that is for the good. But it has
00:28:27.320
to be in a complex of systems thinking. And the conclusion is, we're off, we got to go, go, go.
00:28:32.860
Otherwise, the systems continue to collapse, COVID notwithstanding.
00:28:37.320
Let me then ask you about why that's happening in your estimation and your fellow committee
00:28:43.520
members here. Is it because government is relying on bad science or flawed science? Or is it that
00:28:48.980
governments are in your view drawing the wrong conclusions from science that is at its core sound
00:28:55.300
it's a great question and it's one for the history books and we do at the end of our uh this exit
00:29:00.580
table that we provided i recommend all people look at is eight by 21 matrix with detailed
00:29:05.780
choreography across all regions of the country call us all systems at the end we do call for a
00:29:10.820
royal commission on the pandemic lessons learned and best practices around the world my own
00:29:15.940
um working hypothesis is that we collapsed intellectually and systems wise in the in
00:29:25.460
the machinery of government at the very start whereas science advisors and scientists were
00:29:31.460
at the very margins of public decision making in 2019 we all of a sudden said the scientists
00:29:37.460
are in charge and our scientists are some of the best in the world they're clinically excellent
00:29:42.020
and they're well-intentioned good professionals but with the greatest respect they stink at public
00:29:47.220
policy public policy is public policy is a separate craft no less complex and requiring
00:29:53.540
no less intellectual um capacity well yeah they're not economists they're not constitutional scholars
00:30:01.380
and i mean those are just two significant things that were absent from much of the discourse early
00:30:06.580
on especially but i'd say even now to some extent education specialists social social scientists
00:30:11.940
social policy people economists business people constitutional lawyers international strategists
00:30:17.860
national unity thinkers uh everything related to the complex system that we call uh canadian
00:30:24.580
society second largest country in the world and we imagine that all of our thinking reduces to
00:30:29.780
covet the covet is the central condition and covet is obviously an amazing a massive shock to the
00:30:34.660
system but all along we should have had a complex of thinkers and a synthesis at the top called a
00:30:42.580
policy synthesis that's what leadership is about we collapsed that in favor of the scientists who
00:30:47.700
all of a sudden had decision-making power and veto power over school closures business closures
00:30:52.820
border closures the social fabric vaccination on vaccination they signed off on government and
00:31:03.040
that extended well beyond their legitimate ken.
00:31:05.480
In many cases, they didn't know what they were doing,
00:31:14.580
I think it's very original across the countries
00:31:17.500
and I'm not aware of any other national committee
00:31:20.320
in any other country around the world that has done this.
00:31:29.140
brought them together to exit nationally and we have a policy lead the science feeds into that
00:31:35.380
and so the choreography we have is is that of a policy choreography determined by
00:31:41.300
excellent science and scientists one thing that was interesting looking at the table that you
00:31:48.420
provided here is you don't just break it down chronologically you know from steps you take in
00:31:53.220
February and March and beyond but also regionally and some things are general you know the end of
00:31:58.580
restrictions that's something that applies in the north atlanta canada central canada the west
00:32:04.020
where are the areas where you do think there are regional differences here that need to be
00:32:07.700
taken into consideration because that's not something that we've really heard discussed
00:32:11.300
in fact in a lot of ways it's been a very one-size-fits-all solution that has been offered
00:32:15.940
by the federal government certainly it's a great question where the country is very big i repeat
00:32:21.460
it's second biggest country in the world and we divide it into four regions atlantic center
00:32:25.700
centers canada uh sorry ontario quebec uh the west four provinces and the huge north which is
00:32:31.460
the size territory of the european union so it's huge uh for ontario for instance uh the most
00:32:39.060
cataclysmic school closures we recommend an immediate door-to-door campaign to find a
00:32:44.420
hundred thousand plus third bucket kids kids out of all school permanently not homeschooled not
00:32:49.300
pod school not physical school no school we must be found immediately that's particular to ontario
00:32:55.300
and then something like section 22 that has allowed officers of medical health to close
00:33:01.300
schools and close businesses in a very decentralized way we we advised for that to be rescinded in the
00:33:07.300
Ontario Health Protection Promotion Act immediately on top of all of the restrictions vaccine
00:33:13.540
passports but if you go to the north of the country all of a sudden we sit we talk about
00:33:18.500
international borders we talk about borders between the territories very different realities
00:33:23.220
because they they are completely isolated if you go to the west of the country we have specific
00:33:28.660
recommendations related to indigenous communities to to business and and grants and loan guarantees
00:33:36.660
we also announce a national uh canada walk for youth on april 3rd of this year to really
00:33:43.220
physically impose the youth who have suffered most during this pandemic of canada
00:33:48.100
to get out in sports teams schools communities university level to show their force they are
00:33:54.660
the future so the choreography you're right is very regional properly so because the pandemic
00:33:59.860
has been very variegated across the regions through time across eight systems let me go
00:34:05.140
through the systems quickly there's covid public health non-covid public health there's education
00:34:11.060
the economy institutions national unity social fabric international one quick thing that people
00:34:17.060
won't note it won't won't recognize including decision makers is while we call for immediate
00:34:22.500
uh removal of vaccination mandates vaccination conditionality although continued new vaccination
00:34:29.460
campaigns for the most immunosuppressed immunocompromised and aged when new vaccines
00:34:34.180
come out for everyone else it's off to the races we're learning we're studying immediately without
00:34:40.900
fetish without without any zombie exit without anything gradual immediate because we need that
00:34:45.700
high energy but people don't realize that there are all these vaccination impositions across the
00:34:51.060
society that are out of control businesses schools private schools camps universities sports clubs
00:34:57.940
that are just being imposed and proliferated out of control mostly for marketing or fetish
00:35:04.420
purposes or ideological purposes and when the government stops the vaccination mandates at
00:35:09.220
the center these continue and they create huge chaos in the social fabric so all these systems
00:35:14.500
need to be understood in their totality and we call for an end to that again not for ideological
00:35:19.040
purposes but because that's over we're off to the races across the systems oh I mean obviously a lot
00:35:25.220
of the restrictions to do with travel to do with public servants to do with some of the national
00:35:31.220
level things like vaccine procurement or areas that are within the purview of the federal government
00:35:35.480
a lot of the things that you're pushing for when it comes to health care systems when it comes to
00:35:39.460
education are things that would have to be instituted at a provincial level and we know
00:35:44.320
that premiers talk the first ministers and the prime minister they all get together but when
00:35:49.240
push comes to shove how do you choreograph something when you're talking about 13 different
00:35:52.960
governments not to mention local and regional governments underneath that it's a great question
00:35:58.400
on the federal side just strict federal powers obviously we are we advise and call for a
00:36:05.400
reinstitution of federal control over interprovincial borders and those need to be removed
00:36:11.160
physical borders regulatory borders psychological borders let us never imagine in the future that
00:36:16.920
provinces will just willy-nilly set up interprovincial borders that's proper and you're
00:36:21.320
just talking about within the country there that's within the country these are interprovincial and
00:36:26.200
provincial territorial borders that have been erected willy-nilly by provinces and the federal
00:36:31.640
government ceded that authority the federal government was reimposed itself and rid the
00:36:35.880
country of these internal borders because otherwise we don't have a country we don't have a federation
00:36:39.880
huge blockages to economic uh wealth and travel and psychological unity but the federal government
00:36:46.280
must bang heads the leaders are the provincial governments that have imposed restrictions for a
00:36:51.720
variety of interests and and and purposes the federal government must choreograph this exit
00:36:57.480
by bringing everyone together and launching this national plan a lot of the instruments are in the
00:37:02.120
provincial hands some municipal but the federal government must declare for the country as we've
00:37:08.440
already allowed it to do through this national committee non-partisan that it's over it's over
00:37:15.240
because other countries have already said such our capacity to deal with any uh seasonal uptick
00:37:23.880
is plentiful and on a systems understanding canada has other fish to fry very serious ones
00:37:31.480
so the federal government has huge instruments has huge spending power still
00:37:35.400
it has inter-provincial it has international power and it controls huge institutions
00:37:40.440
sectors like the banks all the all the inter-provincial international transport sectors
00:37:45.720
the north which in my other thinking is the future of the country will open up
00:37:50.440
a huge arteries of imagination and economic and social activity and that all of that is in Ottawa.
00:37:58.680
One dimension of this roadmap that I found quite fascinating because it's not something that's
00:38:03.800
gotten I'd say any substantive discussion is the rebuilding of institutional trust in Canada. I
00:38:10.760
think certainly mistrust has been something we hear spoken about on an individual level and
00:38:15.560
certainly in media it's a discussion that I've had here on this show and elsewhere
00:38:19.000
people not trusting public health officials politicians and in many cases for good reason but
00:38:23.800
you've actually put this specifically front and center in the roadmap recovery of trust in
00:38:29.240
institutions and also institutional efficacy so it goes hand in hand i think the institutions
00:38:34.040
need to be effective and they also need to communicate that efficacy do you i mean first
00:38:39.160
off do you agree with my assertion that this has not gotten nearly enough attention and i guess more
00:38:44.600
fundamentally how do you rebuild that trust correct it's not got enough attention because
00:38:50.600
some of the ones that need to provide the attention are the ones in whom attend trust
00:38:55.240
has been lost frankly so we start with the information space i don't want to call it the
00:38:59.800
media space i call the information space how canadians get their information how they feed
00:39:04.680
information to government how government feeds information to canadians over the last two years
00:39:10.120
we've been unable to tell our own stories our own realities it's also important that we it's also
00:39:16.760
explains why we do regional roadmaps on top of the national one because the regions are so different
00:39:22.440
amongst themselves and we're not able to tell that diversity of experience to the central governments
00:39:27.960
to media apparatus and based in toronto and montreal who are not leaving zoom rooms so media
00:39:33.400
is one of them huge um deficiency in performance over the last two years we can explain why
00:39:39.640
but that needs to be reconsolidated if we're going to have a country that is able to inform
00:39:44.680
its decision makers about realities on the ground and tell its own stories to itself.
00:39:49.400
Government. Governments at all levels have essentially been operating in emergency mode for
00:39:54.600
two years. Leave aside the Emergencies Act in Ottawa. This emergency's power is almost universal.
00:40:01.560
It's by two or three people at the center of government in all the provincial capitals and
00:40:06.600
the federal capital making decrees by fiat for countries that that a country for a country they
00:40:15.160
do not see that is again the second largest in the world with those feedback mechanisms absent
00:40:20.680
because the media itself is not reporting properly the media itself is not leaving the zoom room
00:40:25.400
and as a result regardless of the intellect and good intention of the decision makers huge huge
00:40:31.320
mistakes of public policy and administration hence the eight crises of system we have in the country
00:40:37.800
that are not seen in other countries countries less developed or smaller they just did not
00:40:43.240
collapse because they didn't collapse the institutions you know of course there are
00:40:46.120
other institutions like if you want to call the emergency or police services you have to wonder
00:40:50.520
whether they'll come in some cases if you want to do banking if there's a mistake in the banking if
00:40:55.800
your account is frozen in in in in the current services what are the appeal mechanisms
00:41:01.160
if your child son or daughter is not being educated because of closures in schools and
00:41:06.920
the third bucket condition we talked about what is the appeal mechanism how do you get information
00:41:11.800
about how to re-educate your child this is all collapse of systems and institutions that were
00:41:16.840
foreign to us in 2019 and we have to carefully reconsolidate reconstitute these institutions if
00:41:22.760
we're going to have a country so as we talked about earlier this is something that you are
00:41:28.520
driving with your committee to advise the government governments do not like moving swiftly
00:41:33.960
as we've seen even with places like Alberta and Saskatchewan which have been more quick than other
00:41:39.160
jurisdictions to want to lift their vaccine passports and whatnot they are putting plans
00:41:44.200
in place that take weeks to months to do it so how do you with your data with your information
00:41:50.040
go to governments and say no you can do this immediately right so great great question again
00:41:56.360
good questions as always andrew d i want to for your distinguished listeners just disabuse them
00:42:03.000
of the idea that the exit is just removal of restrictions well that but that is the first
00:42:07.560
step that's where that's coming from it's it's a concurrent step and why because we we say that at
00:42:13.080
the very first box amongst hundreds of them removal of all restrictions which provides
00:42:18.600
over the immunos immunocompromised immunosuppressed why um not because i like or dislike restrictions
00:42:25.560
because on the system's understanding we've collapsed all the other ones and therefore we
00:42:30.440
need to move with speed but if we were only to remove restrictions we would still have 200 000
00:42:34.920
kids out of school still huge learning gaps we still have tens of thousands of businesses
00:42:39.400
disintegrated huge social conflict so we need to restitch all that as we remove restrictions it's
00:42:44.360
not remove restrictions and off she goes because that is continued chaos so government needs to
00:42:50.760
move on all systems beyond just removal of restrictions which is the negative step
00:42:55.480
governments are historically slow canada is extremely slow so we have to do things that
00:43:00.360
are counterintuitive to us when the medical officer of health of ontario kieran moore says
00:43:06.360
i imagine my gut tells me that the masks of students will be off at some point but later
00:43:11.160
than the rest that's a gut that's that's his gut talking he's talking to canadian there which is
00:43:16.040
the gut it's not the gut the strategic approach is we're off to the races why because our kids are
00:43:22.440
two years behind on learning and many of them are not in school why must we be off to the races in
00:43:27.400
national unity through uncertain borders because the country is falling apart in the centrifugal
00:43:32.360
forces why must we be off to the race in the economy because if we wait more businesses will
00:43:37.720
disintegrate they don't stick around for you to have a coffee and say i feel comfortable now
00:43:43.000
lifting restrictions these are what i call twitter or facebook positions but they're not strategic
00:43:47.960
positions for a country like canada and therefore we need to overcome the foolish instinct to to
00:43:53.080
believe our twitter feed and say this is the structure of our country this is the structure
00:43:57.480
of the systems in collapse there are eight of them we need to inject maximum energy at the front end
00:44:02.760
in order for all of them to begin to reconsolidate and only then might we in more difficult post
00:44:08.840
pandemic circumstance reach 2019 because we've collapsed way beyond way before 2019 we remove
00:44:15.560
everything today we're still not at 2019 quality of life other countries are because they didn't
00:44:20.120
collapse to the same extent the report you can access at i21cq.com the institute for 21st century
00:44:29.880
questions it is the product of the canada science and policy committee to exit the pandemic the
00:44:35.160
Chair of that committee, Irvin Student, joins me now. Irvin, always a pleasure, sir. Thanks for
00:44:39.020
coming on today. Thank you. I'm co-chair of Quadro Caramontang, doctor, and we've brought
00:44:44.540
the scientists and policy people together, and always a pleasure. Thanks, Andrew.
00:44:49.240
And yeah, I'm glad he mentioned Dr. Quadro Caramontang. He's been fantastic, and of all
00:44:53.700
the doctors that the mainstream media TV shows tend to draw from, he's been one of the strongest
00:44:59.600
because he's actually been speaking out, especially with children, but in general,
00:45:08.420
Again, being anti-lockdown is not being anti-science
00:45:16.980
because again, some of the very scientists are saying,
00:45:31.400
This is the Andrew Lawton Show here on True North.
00:45:39.500
well i know it's we tried to pack a lot into the show here my thanks to yaroslav baran and also
00:45:49.380
to urban student and also importantly to all of you tuning in we're going to be back tomorrow with
00:45:54.840
another brand new edition of the andrew lawton show i'm not even going to tell you what's on it
00:45:58.720
i'm not trying to keep you in suspense but i just don't know that much is going on that i don't want
00:46:03.440
to commit to a path and then find that news is causing us to rip up the run sheet and start
00:46:08.180
again. But whatever it is, I assure you it'll be good. My thanks to you all. If you want to
00:46:12.040
contribute to keep this show on the air, you can head on over to donate.tnc.news. And we thank you
00:46:18.240
so much for your generous support. We'll talk to you tomorrow, folks. This is The Andrew Lawton
00:46:21.920
Show. Thank you, God bless, and good day. Thanks for listening to The Andrew Lawton Show.
00:46:28.460
Support the program by donating to True North at www.tnc.news.