00:03:22.160Especially with facial wreck and so forth.
00:03:24.260I mean, we saw what happened with the two Michaels, you know.
00:03:27.540They ended up in prison, which was largely seen, at least in Canada's side, that it was retribution for what happened with the Huawei CEO and all of that got really ugly.
00:03:40.380But if you happen to be in China and you know you're constantly being surveilled, then you know that potentially you're a target by a government that doesn't have much respect for civil rights at all.
00:03:53.160And so I think Canadians should be aware of that, traveling to China.
00:03:57.540But did the tone of the report, I mean, do you have any thoughts about the overall warning?
00:04:03.720You know, is it odd, somebody with your background, military analysis and so forth, for the military to come forth with a warning of this kind?
00:09:49.460Yeah, I don't think that there's any doubt that the rules in democracy matter.
00:09:53.500And when technology is used to, you know, surveil a citizen and even seize the bank account, it's problematic in democracy.
00:10:08.600I think the other side of this is that, you know, these systems open a whole new vulnerability in terms of hacking and cyber attack and foreign countries gathering intelligence on individuals in Canada.
00:10:26.080So, I mean, I think this cuts both ways. It's a way of maintaining surveillance of your domestic security and your citizenry, but it also opens you up to hacking and cyber attack and theft of very valuable information by foreign entities.
00:10:45.540And it encourages self-censorship, doesn't it? That's one of the things that the report speaks
00:10:51.940about is, you know, you put these measures in place, you essentially scare people into shutting
00:10:58.160up and not to, you know, so that they don't criticize the government, don't criticize your
00:11:04.180policies. And I think that's one of the elements here that they raised. And I can't help but think
00:11:10.720that's an effective way to shut down your critics well it is and i mean you know there are studies
00:11:17.120now on on how uh authoritarian states use social media uh to uh punish uh dissidents and uh
00:11:28.640their opposition in country and so you know self-censorship in some places in the world
00:11:35.600becomes a method of survival and you you have to make make those choices and we've seen similar
00:11:42.880situations in canada where we see people that are let's say champions of the jewish community or
00:11:49.520israel being uh silenced or attempted to be silenced by uh different uh groups that support
00:11:58.400either iran or or the houthis or hezbollah you know this is this is we're seeing it every day
00:12:07.040and there are some people that are you know noted for being under this kind of scrutiny
00:12:11.680and having to protect their their uh their person and and their their personal security
00:12:18.320yeah the report talks about propaganda and coercion among the tools that are used i mean those have
00:12:24.400have been around forever. But I can't help but look at our own situation in Canada and see
00:12:29.760a media that has largely been bought off by the government. We've got so many hundreds of
00:12:37.340millions funneled into media. And meantime, those who don't take government money are often
00:12:44.720ostracized, kept out of the loop. Information is not shared with them. They don't have access to
00:12:50.980politicians i i can't help but think that this is the real propaganda strategy of the government
00:12:57.020now you pay off the media you reward the good media with money as long as they play ball and
00:13:04.660you alienate others who refuse to take your money and become part of the propaganda machinery if
00:13:11.700you will what do you think yeah i mean i think that that's that's all part of of you know how
00:13:18.200we're seeing, uh, uh, the country move, uh, in terms of, of, of some of these
00:13:25.340measures, and I mean, you know, the government talking about digital ID, uh,
00:13:30.300you, you saw it introduced in Britain and it, and it was introduced because it
00:13:35.080was a measure to, um, to monitor immigration, or at least that's what the
00:13:39.600government claimed, but it quickly became, uh, an issue, uh, for the
00:13:44.280Starmer government and one that I don't think that they moved forward at the
00:13:47.520end of the day. And you're seeing, you know, different controls of the media and censorship
00:13:52.920in the United Kingdom. And I think you're seeing those measures reintroduced here in different
00:14:00.060government bills and different activities by the government. You know, governments don't like to
00:14:05.580be criticized, even in democracy. And so, you know, governments take measures that they see
00:14:14.460abroad or elsewhere and adopt them and try and integrate them into policy here. And I think
00:14:21.660there are challenges with that, particularly around a free and open media and accountable media.
00:14:29.940Yeah. I mean, when it comes to government, their priority is power, holding onto power at all
00:14:37.060costs. And so if they see their critics as a threat, especially when you can get on social
00:14:43.540media platforms and get millions of views, you know, you can very much become a threat to them
00:14:49.300and they're not going to take it kindly. So they're going to use the infrastructure of the
00:14:53.700state, including laws like, you know, the online harms bill or any of these other quasi-censorship
00:15:02.540related bills to silence people who are essentially a threat to their continued hold on power.
00:15:10.920And that's what it really boils down to for these people. They're a lot less interested in, quote unquote, democracy than they are in having their hands on the levers of power and holding it on, holding onto it at all costs.
00:15:27.320And I think ultimately that's where all of these measures come in, don't they?
00:15:33.020And I guess when you throw in technology, digital technology, like the kind that they now have available to them, you would have to be extremely good not to use these things in order to punish, surveil, or target otherwise your enemies, your political enemies.
00:15:53.720I mean, that to me is what we're heading towards.
00:15:58.240And I guess the fear is that ultimately you're going to get a one-party state because that0.98
00:16:04.020one party is going to be the one that is there to employ all of these tools, like the Chinese0.50
00:16:10.300Communist Party has, to hold on to power for decades upon decades.
00:16:15.360And nobody is able to stop them because you have no ability to even criticize them without
00:16:22.260facing retribution from the state you know well you know we're not there in canada yet but but
00:16:30.660that danger is down the road and when you you know couple digital technology uh with ai and you get
00:16:37.780into predictive policing and predictive um intelligence and things like that you you get
00:16:46.820into a space where mistakes are made ai is not perfect uh and and but it does you know scoop up
00:16:56.180a lot of information and and set out uh that information in an easily used manner and and
00:17:05.620that could be used to compromise people's privacy and their rights and so i mean in democracy as i
00:17:12.660said earlier the rules matter and i think that you know one of the things that we have to be very
00:17:19.540vigilant on is what those rules are in society and what the oversight and accountability
00:17:25.220mechanisms are and are they effective and and those those laws that legislation around those
00:17:32.820areas needs to be refreshed on a regular basis to keep pace with the technology yeah i mean if this
00:17:40.340particular government had not gotten its majority the way it did or anyway then some of these bills
00:17:47.980would never have passed and uh i can't help but wonder if you know passing those bills was a real
00:17:54.340priority for these people bills that many people considered draconian and uh anti-freedom um any
00:18:02.720advice for people who are concerned about this uh how how do you think that society in general
00:18:10.200that still values the freedoms that we've enjoyed forever in this country.
00:18:19.020I guess what it comes down to in my mind is that Canadians have a very strange perception of threats.
00:18:26.220And Canadians need to be more vigilant and more concerned about the threats that they face at home and abroad.
00:18:33.900And this is one of those areas where digitalization, AI, and government surveillance routines present real concern to Canadians or should present a real concern to Canadians.
00:18:50.740And it needs to be followed very closely.
00:18:53.820my concern is you know we're a country that that looks at the united states as a bigger threat than0.55
00:19:01.000china and looks at the united states as a bigger threat than russia and i find that a warped uh
00:19:08.440view of of threat and and a warped perception of the security situation around us and you know
00:19:16.980canadians need to you know verify what they're seeing and what they're hearing and look at it
00:19:22.620closely i mean especially after the election interference that we've seen repeated interference0.98
00:19:29.100in our elections year after year after year it's it's the chinese that are doing it i mean yeah0.64
00:19:34.380there are other other countries involved but it's the chinese that are the main bad actors in this0.95
00:19:39.500case and and somehow all of this seems to be glossed over in favor of hating the americans
00:19:45.260anyway thank you so much for coming on the show joe we really appreciate it welcome thank you
00:19:49.500If you enjoyed the show and appreciate independent journalism, please consider becoming a premier
00:19:56.480member of Juno News by going to junownews.com backslash straight up.