Juno News - SHOCKING new study shows just how far Canada has fallen under the Liberals

00:00:00.000 China's killing our canola, $45 billion gone, Western farmers bleed, Mark Carney silent,

00:00:11.200 made millions off Beijing's dime. He won't fight. He's Beijing's banker, not our prime minister.

00:00:19.220 Hi, I'm Candice Malcolm, and this is The Candice Malcolm Show. Folks, we have four more days until

00:00:32.900 the election, until Canadians decide their fate. And I wanted to spend the show today talking about

00:00:38.280 what has happened in Canada over the past decade, really paint a picture of our country, which I

00:00:44.260 believe is in decline. You know, Pierre Poliev and the Conservatives, one of their slogans is that

00:00:48.480 Canada is broken. I think that almost all of us agree with that, but it's not just that it's

00:00:52.800 broken. It's that Canada was this once great country, and we have the potential to be so much

00:00:58.180 better, so much bigger, so much greater. And yet, stat after stat, every graph that I'm going to show

00:01:05.120 on the program today just paints a different picture of our great country coming apart, being in

00:01:11.200 decline. And so I don't want to just dwell on the negative today. I want to also talk about the

00:01:14.740 positive and how we can turn things around. And I'm very pleased today to be joined by Brett Wilson.

00:01:20.480 Brett is an investment banker, an entrepreneur, and a philanthropist. And he was the star of CBC's

00:01:26.020 Dragon Den, really did more for entrepreneurship and promoting really just the heroic efforts of

00:01:33.620 free market business people taking risks, innovating exactly what our country needs. So Brett,

00:01:39.240 thank you so much for joining the show. It's an honor to have you today.

00:01:41.900 Brett Wilson Pleasure to be with you again.

00:01:44.300 Well, okay, let's start with some of the things that I was talking about here. So I'll start with

00:01:49.780 our friend David Knight Legg posted this about the quality of life index in Canada. So Canada is now

00:01:56.860 ranked 29th in terms of quality of living. Here, I'll read from David's post. He says,

00:02:02.180 we're 29. Under the Conservative government in 2014, Canada's quality of life index was tied for fifth

00:02:07.700 with Denmark and Finland. After a decade of liberal misrule, using the identical metrics,

00:02:13.640 Canadian quality of life has dropped to 29th in 2025. What happened? Well, he writes,

00:02:18.780 a currently advised decade of reckless borrowing and debt, dying productivity, over-regulation,

00:02:23.580 climate alarmism, widespread immigration fraud, vastly expanded obese bureaucracy, declining

00:02:29.360 healthcare, rising crime, declining military, declining infrastructure, and a hollowed out currency.

00:02:34.440 Our dollar is now worth 68 cents to the American dollar per capita. Wealth is now ranked alongside

00:02:40.800 Mississippi, the poorest U.S. state. So, I mean, he really paints out all of the areas of decline.

00:02:49.440 And I mean, the quality of life index is not a partisan group. It's very quite objective.

00:02:53.880 It looks at every country around the world. Do you think this is just really a damning indictment

00:02:59.840 of liberal rule in Canada? Well, certainly the last decade's been difficult. There's just no policy,

00:03:05.800 no practice, no effort that I see in any way, shape, or form that has made Canada better. So,

00:03:12.100 the fact that, again, I go back to the polls in the fall. Obviously, the Trudeau liberals were

00:03:20.360 plummeting. You know, the numbers were just awful. And it was obvious that people's, Canada's disdain

00:03:27.900 for Trudeau was palpable. The fact that a guy, I like, happened to like Mark Carney as a person,

00:03:34.580 not as a leader, but the fact that he stepped back in and all of a sudden the liberals are going,

00:03:40.060 oh, everything's fine. We're going to be okay. And you look at the cabinet that he's posted,

00:03:44.840 21 of the 23 people, in fact, really all 23, were Trudeau. There's nothing new, nothing new

00:03:52.460 happening. Guibault got moved over. He was one of the guys that helped destroy Canada's energy economy,

00:03:58.260 or tried to, and is working on it. But he's sort of stepped to the side, but he's still in cabinet.

00:04:03.180 He's not gone. And so, to try and answer your question better, the future requires change.

00:04:09.940 And the fact that somehow, with Carney in the driver's seat, the liberals think that there's

00:04:14.540 going to be change? There's no change. Nothing. And again, the results of the last decade have been

00:04:20.480 awful on every level, whether it's politics, or it's bureaucracy, or it's prisons, or it's the

00:04:27.900 economy. Nothing has gone well. Nothing. I tend to agree that we need a total redirection in terms of

00:04:35.720 where our country is going. Just a few more graphs that I wanted to share here. So, this one here shows

00:04:40.760 America's richest and poorest states versus Canada. So, this is really unbelievable. The richest

00:04:45.920 American state, I don't like this at all, Brett. The richest American state is Washington, D.C.,

00:04:50.020 which isn't really a state. It's a district. But the average income in D.C. is $260,000. I don't

00:04:57.000 think that's a good thing when the richest place in the country is the government town. And so,

00:05:01.340 you have all these wealthy, I don't know, government contractors or bureaucrats, frankly.

00:05:06.180 But regardless of that, the second richest state is New York state with $110,000 as their

00:05:12.400 GDP per capita average. Then goes Massachusetts. The U.S. average is $80,000. And then you get down

00:05:19.520 to the poorest U.S. states, Arkansas, West Virginia. And that is where Canada would fit in. Canada would 0.67

00:05:24.960 be between the second poorest and the poorest American state between West Virginia and Mississippi

00:05:29.380 at just $54,900 average GDP. This is another way of looking at that. The real GDP per capita growth

00:05:40.440 in the OECD. So, these are the richest countries, not just comparing ourselves to Americans in the

00:05:44.760 States, but all of the world. You can see Ireland, Poland, Turkey, Lithuania. Those are the countries

00:05:50.020 that have had tremendous growth over the past decade. The United States is sort of middle of the pack with

00:05:54.760 18%. And you have to go all the way to the bottom, the second to least growth, 1.4% over a decade

00:06:01.540 for GDP per capita. This is the next graph is showing the same thing, just in a different way.

00:06:06.880 Again, Canada is at the bottom. And these are the years that the liberals were in office. These are

00:06:11.460 the years that Trudeau was prime minister. And for many of those years, Mark Carney was his economic

00:06:15.900 advisor. Final one here. This is to me just an absolute damning indictment of our immigration system 1.00

00:06:22.720 and how careless it was. Immigration, in theory, is a good thing. It can help our country. The way

00:06:28.700 that it was done under Justin Trudeau, it was really just open the floodgates, let everybody come in to

00:06:33.280 try to artificially boost our GDP. And so, here it compares the annual population growth with the top

00:06:39.980 graph here, the number of new residential units constructed. No wonder there's a housing crisis.

00:06:45.320 And it's a shame that this hasn't been a more prominent topic in the election campaign,

00:06:51.000 how immigration has caused so many of these problems. You cannot let a million people into 1.00

00:06:55.940 the country every year and then only build 100 or 200,000 new homes. Like, the math just doesn't

00:07:01.280 add up and eventually it catches up on you. The next graph is also interesting. Annual population

00:07:06.320 growth in Canada versus the change in number of family doctors and hospital beds. So, while we're

00:07:13.300 having 1 million newcomers, I mean, in 2022-23, we added 2 million people. But at that same year,

00:07:19.960 there were just 800 new doctors, 800 new family doctors out in the country. And 1,359 hospital

00:07:28.460 beds were cut during that time. So, you know, no wonder our health care is in the state it's in.

00:07:34.540 No wonder our housing costs are spiraling out of control. And young Canadians just simply, 1.00

00:07:38.780 the math doesn't make sense for them to ever in their entire lives be able to own even a one-bedroom

00:07:43.400 apartment. And yet, you know, it's clearly part of it is because of immigration. And we don't talk

00:07:49.780 about that. What do you make of all this, Brett?

00:07:52.220 Well, certainly the feds don't want to talk about immigration. And I mean, there's also a bias.

00:07:56.820 There's a perception that there's a possibility or a probability that an immigrant will vote for

00:08:03.280 whoever was in power when they were allowed into the country, allowed into the country without true

00:08:08.900 application, without true qualification. And that, I think, is the saddest part of this whole process.

00:08:15.020 Because I shared one of your earlier comments, which is, we welcome the world coming here,

00:08:19.480 but on a thoughtful, organized, and respectful basis. And right now, it's been none of the above,

00:08:25.740 not thoughtful, not organized, and not respectful. And that's a big part of why we're suffering.

00:08:30.560 And of course, the density increases in Ontario and Quebec, because there's greater populations and

00:08:36.520 everything else. And it just doesn't make sense. The other thing that's happening is obviously a

00:08:40.800 fight and a dispute between what the feds do for Medicare or healthcare, and what the provinces do

00:08:46.880 when they're responsible for healthcare. The confusion just abounds. And at no time did Trudeau

00:08:52.660 ever acknowledge that provinces have rights, provinces have responsibility. The things he was

00:08:58.740 trying to do, and just take ESG as an example, for the environment, you know, trying to slap the

00:09:03.380 provinces. And that's obviously, in particular, Alberta, to lesser degree, Saskatchewan, have said,

00:09:09.180 we're going to push back. And we're going to try and stop you from attempting to shut down

00:09:13.120 our economy. And that goes back to the big picture is, can Carney build Canada? And he says, yes. And

00:09:21.200 then he says, ah, but Bill C-69, we're just going to keep that in place. We don't really need to

00:09:26.700 waive that in order to build infrastructure. And again, the idea that Carney, or pardon me,

00:09:31.720 that Poilev has come out with very recently. And this is, it's an old idea, but it's new to the

00:09:37.460 world of politics. And that's the energy corridor, being able to bring energy. And again, it's not

00:09:43.500 just east-west. We need an energy corridor that is north-south. We need to be able to get to

00:09:48.160 Hudson Bay. We need to get down into the states properly. Anyway, there's just so much, there's so

00:09:55.640 much that's wrong about the last decade, that it's staggering, if not stunning, that Carney can

00:10:01.380 pretend that the next decade under him would be completely different.

00:10:05.660 Well, it's interesting because he both tries to distance himself from Trudeau and say that he

00:10:10.140 wasn't there, even though, to your point, he has the same group of people around him. I think

00:10:13.960 Poilev effectively pointed that out during the debate. And in some ways, they're copying the

00:10:18.880 Conservative platform. The main issue of the debate originally, of the election, sorry,

00:10:24.260 it originally was going to be, well, we have this carbon tax or not. Obviously, the Liberals

00:10:27.500 championed it for a decade. It's very central to Mark Carney's sort of worldview and idea that

00:10:32.960 getting to net zero is of absolute importance. He sort of walked away from that. This week,

00:10:39.000 they both put out, both campaigns, the Liberals and the Conservatives put out their costed budgets.

00:10:43.480 And, you know, the top line is sort of both sides want to introduce new spending and rack up more

00:10:50.400 debt. Neither of them have a plan to get to balanced budget in the first term. I will say

00:10:53.940 that Poilev's campaign and platform included a 70% reduction in spending compared to Mark Carney,

00:11:01.880 who does still want to turn on the taps and spend in a Trudeau-esque way, actually spending more money

00:11:06.540 than Trudeau did. I wonder if you can comment on which budget you thought was better and which one do

00:11:12.920 you think would be better in creating the growth that our country so desperately needs?

00:11:17.500 Well, let me throw a curve with that question first. And that's just a comment on Trump,

00:11:22.700 which was obviously a huge part of what's driving the political conversations right now. And again,

00:11:28.620 I know some people hate me for this, but I happen to admire what Trump's trying to do. Again,

00:11:33.920 protect the borders, improve trade, reduce war, improve the environment properly and thoughtfully.

00:11:40.120 Anyway, all of that is a noble goal. I don't like his process. I don't like how he's going about it,

00:11:47.120 throwing his elbows, changing his plan, kicking us in the teeth from time to time. His 51st state jokes

00:11:54.040 are gone. Governor Trudeau was amusing for a period of time. But anyway, in all of that,

00:12:00.840 there's a thought that we can control costs. And one of his core messages was the Department of

00:12:06.120 Government Efficiency, obviously the Elon Musk. And whether Canada can find its own way of cutting

00:12:13.080 costs or not, I think only under Pierre Poilev can we do anything about costs. At no time,

00:12:20.540 and this goes back to answering your question, Carney hasn't made any effort whatsoever. The liberals

00:12:26.000 have made no effort whatsoever to talk about controlling costs. Remember their leader once said

00:12:32.000 that budgets just balance themselves? He didn't have a clue. And obviously, at this point, they don't

00:12:38.460 care. They just want to spend. They want to spend their way into control. They want to gift and give

00:12:43.720 stuff everywhere. And that's without infrastructure. And I think that's probably the most important thing

00:12:49.260 that we're seeing. And again, it's triggered by Trump. But the fact that we need infrastructure to move

00:12:55.620 our natural resources. And whether you call our natural resources the hydropower of Quebec,

00:13:01.380 or the oil and gas industry in Western Canada, or potassium, or uranium, it just doesn't matter.

00:13:08.920 There's so many things that we can do better for the world. But we need infrastructure to ship it to

00:13:13.980 the world. And that's where the liberals for a decade have failed miserably. They've shut it down.

00:13:19.260 They haven't even tried to build it. They've shut it down.

00:13:22.080 Well, it's interesting that at this point in the campaign, the campaign has been going on for five

00:13:25.200 weeks. Mark Carney has been in the prime minister role for, I guess, seven weeks now. And yet,

00:13:29.340 I don't even really know, Brett, where he stands on the issue of pipelines. You're right. He said

00:13:33.300 that he won't get rid of Bill C-69, which is the no more pipelines bill, basically. The regulations

00:13:38.420 make it so much that you can't get an infrastructure project built. In the debate last week, he oddly

00:13:44.360 misspoke and said that we own the Keystone pipeline, which, of course, is not a pipeline that was even

00:13:50.360 completed. It's the one that goes into the United States and brings Alberta oil to a refinery

00:13:55.140 in Texas. It is partially built, but it's not fully built. And I think he meant to say the

00:14:00.600 Trans Mountain pipeline. He said in English earlier in the campaign, in a campaign stop

00:14:06.480 in Kelowna, that he will use all of the powers of the federal government to get major infrastructure

00:14:11.920 projects like pipelines built. He said that he would even use the emergencies power. He was called

00:14:17.140 out on that at the debate by block leader Francois Blanchet, E. Francois Blanchet. And he kind of like

00:14:24.560 tried to walk over it and hand wave it away. And so here we are almost at election day. And I really

00:14:31.160 don't know where the leader stands in terms of pipelines. Alberta wasn't mentioned very much

00:14:37.040 during the campaign. It wasn't mentioned at all, to my recollection, during those two debates.

00:14:42.100 And so I'm wondering, from an Alberta perspective, do you think that these issues have been properly

00:14:48.560 litigated in the public? Do you think that more should have been done to discuss these issues of

00:14:54.340 economic development and growth and really grill the leaders to find out exactly where they stand

00:14:58.440 on these issues? Well, the federal government, which is liberal, still has an emissions cap contemplated

00:15:05.060 for the energy industry. And that's obviously been one of the greatest issues that Danielle Smith and

00:15:10.560 Scott Moe have fought back and thrown elbows saying, and partly, you know, when we introduced

00:15:15.000 in Alberta, what was called the Sovereignty Act, it was to make sure that we understood

00:15:19.000 as a nation who could control what. And at this moment, the liberals think they can control

00:15:24.480 everything. And it's that infrastructure failure that's a problem. By the way, a bit of history,

00:15:30.560 I had the privilege of having dinner with Pierre Paulev 12 or 13 years ago. Well, I met him with a

00:15:37.960 dinner we were doing with John Baird, had a great conversation, and have stayed friends with him

00:15:42.220 ever since. I also had lunch with Mark Carney the week before he was elected by the liberals. And he

00:15:48.780 was sitting and he was running around in Calgary, and he knows I've got a few connections here. And we

00:15:53.280 had a great conversation about infrastructure. And he was adamant, looked me in the eye and said,

00:15:58.080 I'm certain that we can build pipelines. And then a week later, he says, we're not going to restrict

00:16:03.760 Bill 69. So the fact that C-69 kills pipelines, and he doesn't want to kill it, tells me the liberals

00:16:10.640 are still confused as to what infrastructure really means. So no, I'm all in on Paulev. I'm all in on

00:16:17.060 this idea of energy infrastructure, and not just energy, sorry, natural resource infrastructure,

00:16:23.260 being able to ship what we are great at. And again, it goes back to the big picture, potassium,

00:16:28.440 agriculture, farming, trees, coal. I mean, we still ship coal. By the way, we've been shipping coal to

00:16:39.080 China for a decade, and not once have we ever charged a carbon tax on it. And yet, let's be 0.91

00:16:43.580 clear, liberals still plan to keep the carbon tax in place. The bulk of the carbon tax was never

00:16:48.700 explained. This idea that there was a credit, they lied about the numbers. Now they've said, oh, we're

00:16:54.640 going to stop the carbon tax. That's just to get elected. There's going to be a twist, a turn.

00:16:59.520 They aren't planning on eliminating the carbon tax. Why? Because Carney doesn't believe that the world

00:17:04.280 will survive without a carbon tax. Certainly. He's been crystal clear on that.

00:17:08.400 It's so core to his worldview, his ideologies. It's written very clearly in his book,

00:17:13.180 Values. I mean, he was the sort of creator of this concept of net zero, and that whole concept has

00:17:20.660 kind of gone away. It's interesting that Mark Carney gets kind of accused of being an elitist.

00:17:26.140 At one point in the campaign, he said he is a globalist and an elitist, and that's why he should

00:17:29.900 get elected, basically. He came from the World Economic Forum. The World Economic Forum isn't really

00:17:35.760 anything without him. And I think evident of that is the fact that Klaus Schwab has now resigned from

00:17:40.580 that organization. And I think that without those two figures, Mark Carney and Klaus Schwab, it doesn't

00:17:44.800 really exist anymore. The whole ideology is fading away. I think Mark Carney had a bit of a campaign

00:17:49.620 gaffe. That's what I would call it. Earlier this week, he went to a poutine shop near Granby, Quebec,

00:17:57.780 and he said that he was just like Trump. And he joked several times that it was like Trump at

00:18:03.260 McDonald's. I don't know why he would compare himself to Trump during the last week of the

00:18:08.000 campaign. I think maybe he was joking and he thought it was funny. This isn't really the comparison

00:18:13.500 that you want going into Election Day. Like, look at me. I'm going to do a photo op just like

00:18:17.640 President Trump did. I thought that when President Trump did, it was quite charming.

00:18:21.980 And that actually really helped his appeal, that he actually kind of likes getting into the role of

00:18:27.500 like being with the American public, working a working class job. He thinks there's dignity in

00:18:32.380 it. I didn't get that from Mark Carney at all. I felt like it was just kind of awkward. And literally

00:18:37.640 their entire campaign attack ads in this campaign have been, Paul Yev, look at Paul Yev, he's just like

00:18:42.860 Trump. And then here's Carney saying, I'm just like Trump. Dan, what do you think of Carney as

00:18:47.460 his ability to campaign and his ability to connect with everyday Canadians?

00:18:52.640 Well, that's been a bit of frustration. I think what's happened is that Carney is so much more

00:18:57.520 connectable than Trudeau. And so his benchmark is so low that it's easy to make him look better than

00:19:05.220 the last guy. And yet a thoughtful comparison would say, has this guy ever held a hammer or a

00:19:10.360 screwdriver? Has he ever actually built anything of relevance for anything other than himself?

00:19:16.500 I mean, Brookfield's obviously doing well. I mean, you saw the messages that came out of

00:19:20.540 the president or prime minister, whatever, the prime minister of England, whatever her title was,

00:19:26.640 I'm sorry. Liz Truss, I think you're talking about.

00:19:29.060 But her disdain for her Bank of Canada guy was palpable. And so if he hasn't really delivered on

00:19:36.900 anything at any time, anywhere, but he still looks better than Trudeau. And again, that's the bizarre

00:19:43.280 part here is Trudeau had developed such a disdain or the Canada had developed such a disdain for

00:19:49.380 Trudeau. It was across all platforms. It didn't matter where he started and the numbers. But again,

00:19:55.180 let's go back to polling. The polling obviously was very clear that at one time, the disdain for

00:20:00.620 Trudeau drove the conservatives up and the liberals down. You get rid of Trudeau and now all of a sudden

00:20:05.300 the liberals rally. I am, I'm openly skeptical that the polling is accurate. As a friend of mine

00:20:11.540 said, my kids don't answer the phone, but they do vote. And again, it'll be interesting to see where

00:20:17.220 all of this unfolds. I'm apprehensive. I'm worried that we're not going to be thoughtful as a nation,

00:20:23.100 because any thought at all says the last decade has to be replaced.

00:20:27.300 It's time to upgrade.

00:20:28.740 It's time to replaced.

00:20:29.800 Sorry, sorry to interrupt you. It certainly feels like it's time for a change. And it's frustrating to

00:20:33.940 me that some Canadians think that Mark Kearney has changed enough that he, you know, because his

00:20:37.980 face wasn't all over, he wasn't part of the Trudeau cabinet. It's interesting though, because Pierre

00:20:42.640 Pauli gets critiqued for being a lifelong politician. Well, Mark Kearney is a lifelong bureaucrat,

00:20:47.180 right? And so those are two kind of different skill sets. Yes, Mark Kearney ended up being the

00:20:52.720 chair of Brookfield. Brett, you're a businessman. You know that there's a difference between being the

00:20:57.240 CEO of a company where you're in charge of actually running the business and doing the operations

00:21:01.280 and being on the board, which Mark Kearney was on the board of several of these organizations

00:21:05.220 and he was the chair of the board of Brookfield, which is almost like an advisory role or like

00:21:10.340 a PR role. It's not someone who is actually running the business. It's someone who's almost

00:21:16.400 like in a, yeah, just some kind of an outside role that helps with the leadership team and

00:21:22.640 helps make decisions. So I don't really see, I mean, I suppose on the surface is a very impressive

00:21:28.320 resume, even just, you know, Harvard, Oxford, these big bank government jobs, but again, civil

00:21:34.020 service. And then when it comes to private sector, it's more like he's, he's just there

00:21:38.520 for the PR. Sorry to interrupt. He's got that same presence in terms of how he's running the

00:21:44.100 liberal party. He's present, but it's also obvious now that he's presenting a standard, a set of roles

00:21:50.580 and guidelines that was built by Trudeau's people, not by him. He's presenting the liberal platform.

00:21:56.160 Right. And, and so I wonder just from like a businessman, like entrepreneurial perspective,

00:22:01.660 like, do you share my pessimism about Canada? Do you think it's broken? Do you think that there's

00:22:07.720 hope? Like, is Canada just on this trajectory of decline that no matter who's in charge,

00:22:13.200 it's sort of too late for us? Or do you think that there are a set of policies that can turn Canada

00:22:19.180 into, like can give this new generation, like 20 year olds today, the same kind of opportunities

00:22:24.860 that were available for previous generations? Can Canada get itself back up in that comparison so

00:22:30.920 that our average GDP per capita is in line with the Americans? Or do you think that it's sort of

00:22:37.900 like too late? What do you think? Well, there's several conversations that erupt here. One, I am not

00:22:43.440 going to be participating actively and trying to have Alberta removed from Canada. I have no interest in

00:22:50.300 Alberta being associated as call it the 51st state. Now, do we need to do things differently? Yeah.

00:22:56.960 I mean, the confusion, the confusion of letting the liberals grow our economy when they've destroyed

00:23:03.660 it for 10 years is palpable. And the idea of building infrastructure and getting our natural

00:23:09.060 resources to a global market makes sense. We need to manage our immigration. We need to manage 1.00

00:23:15.580 our bureaucracy. And that's where, again, the Department of Government efficiency will should

00:23:20.260 drive down costs in a dramatic fashion. The fact that we've doubled our bureaucratic headcount in

00:23:26.520 the last 10 years, doubled? No, none of that makes any sense. So again, I get really apprehensive about

00:23:33.460 a liberal, even a liberal minority government with the swing being either Block, who I don't think

00:23:41.600 should be running as a federal party, but that's a separate issue. Or the NDP, who don't offer

00:23:45.800 anything. They just get, they get sold. They're buying, they're buying votes. They're buying alignment.

00:23:52.060 They, again, ignore the NDP. But no, I'm apprehensive. I'm extremely apprehensive about what's going to

00:23:57.940 happen next week if the liberals wander into a continuous mood. The economy, we can regrow it. We can

00:24:05.840 rebuild it. We can get things going. But we can't do it under a liberal, in a liberal platform.

00:24:11.600 Well, it doesn't seem like they've really put together a picture of growth. Their entire campaign

00:24:16.260 was really just oriented around who can stop Trump, who can be the most anti-American, who can better

00:24:22.580 sort of balance that out, rather than who can best grow the Canadian economy, which I think is the

00:24:28.120 ballot box question. Well, Brett Wilson, we really appreciate your time and your insights. Thank you so

00:24:31.980 much for joining the show. We appreciate it.

00:24:34.360 You're welcome. Look forward to chatting again.

00:24:36.260 All right. Thank you so much. All right. That's all the time we have for today, folks. We'll be back again

00:24:39.240 tomorrow with all the news. Candace Malcolm. This is The Candace Malcolm Show. Thank you and God bless.

00:24:43.040 We'll be right back.

00:24:47.140 We'll be right back.

00:24:49.060 We'll be right back.

00:24:51.600 Bye.

00:24:56.540 Bye.

00:25:02.040 Bye.

00:25:04.780 Bye.

00:25:08.280 Bye.

00:25:09.220 Bye.

00:25:10.800 Bye.

00:25:11.120 Transcription by CastingWords

Juno News - April 24, 2025

SHOCKING new study shows just how far Canada has fallen under the Liberals

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript