Juno News - August 20, 2023


Should Canada boycott the WEF? (feat. Spencer Fernando)


Episode Stats


Length

13 minutes

Words per minute

223.10507

Word count

2,967

Sentence count

156

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged

Toxicity

3

sentences flagged

Hate speech

3

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

A piece in the Canadian press accuses Pierre Polyev of "embracing mainstream conspiracy theories" over his criticism of the Canadian government's approach to the World Economic Forum. We're joined by independent journalist Spencer Fernando to talk about it.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 The big story that I wanted to talk about today is this piece in the Canadian press
00:00:14.200 that was published everywhere. CBC picked it up, CTV, I think even the Toronto Sun did.
00:00:20.260 And it is a story taking aim at Pierre Polyev and the Conservatives
00:00:24.280 over their discussion of the World Economic Forum.
00:00:27.740 The story in the Canadian press is accusing Trudeau or accusing Polyev of, quote,
00:00:33.440 embracing language of mainstream conspiracy theories.
00:00:37.200 This is, as Polyev puts it, a hit piece through and through.
00:00:41.520 It quotes two so-called experts, one of whom is a liberal donor,
00:00:45.460 but they conveniently leave that out of the article.
00:00:48.340 Let's bring in Spencer Fernando here, a fantastic independent journalist.
00:00:51.900 And apart from half the cabinet, not, as I understand it,
00:00:55.700 an alumnus of Klaus Schwab's Young Global Leaders Program,
00:00:59.300 although who knows, apparently half the people in the country are here.
00:01:02.380 Spencer, it is wonderful to talk to you. Thanks for coming back on the show.
00:01:05.320 Good to be here.
00:01:06.620 Now, how this all started, of course, is Pierre Polyev says what he's been talking about
00:01:10.860 for quite a while here.
00:01:12.080 And then the Canadian press just pounces on this
00:01:15.080 and accuses him of embracing conspiracy theories for expressing a position
00:01:20.180 that I think most Canadians would probably find utterly unobjectionable, right?
00:01:25.240 Yeah. And, you know, one point I make when I talk about the WEF
00:01:29.040 and how people respond to it is that there's a big nuance that's being missed,
00:01:33.580 obviously missed on purpose by the media,
00:01:35.220 which is there's really two kinds of critics of the WEF.
00:01:37.300 There are the legit conspiracy theorists,
00:01:39.480 the ones who claim, oh, they, you know, they caused the pandemic.
00:01:42.480 Obviously, no evidence for that. No one credible believes that
00:01:45.180 who claim that there's some, you know, evil, sinister organization,
00:01:48.440 you know, controlling the whole world behind the scenes.
00:01:50.700 But then there's the very legitimate criticism,
00:01:52.800 which is what Polyev is talking about,
00:01:54.340 which is that, you know, if you look at what they talk about,
00:01:56.960 it's this kind of policies that are hurting Canada right now,
00:01:59.200 you know, driving up the cost of energy,
00:02:01.300 you know, moving decision-making, you know,
00:02:02.900 away from a lot of, you know, national governments
00:02:05.200 and the electorates of countries having influence over their governments
00:02:09.020 and, you know, bringing things up to, you know, a higher level
00:02:11.220 that's more detached from the day-to-day lives of people.
00:02:13.880 And that's obviously a negative thing.
00:02:15.480 So, of course, the media is not making that nuanced point.
00:02:19.020 They're not talking about how there's different kinds of criticism,
00:02:21.800 some that are legitimate, some that are not.
00:02:23.840 They're just trying to lump it all in as a conspiracy theory
00:02:26.160 and hoping that it'll just stop people from talking about it.
00:02:29.060 Yeah, and it was a very similar dynamic
00:02:31.140 to what we saw on a lot of the COVID discussions,
00:02:34.520 where, you know, there were people that absolutely had,
00:02:37.000 you know, any number of conspiratorial beliefs,
00:02:38.860 but then we also had this group in the middle that are saying,
00:02:40.960 well, hang on, I, you know, I believe COVID's real,
00:02:42.940 but I've got questions about how it originated,
00:02:44.820 or I'm skeptical that we need a vaccine mandate
00:02:47.840 or a vaccine passport to get through it.
00:02:49.520 And then those people were accused of being conspiracy theorists.
00:02:52.820 And it's become one of the most effective vehicles
00:02:55.120 to really shut down criticism.
00:02:58.240 If you can just really lump it all into one category
00:03:01.360 and say anyone raising any questions is a conspiracy theorist,
00:03:04.540 even if, in the case of Polyev,
00:03:06.240 the media failed to come up with a single example
00:03:08.360 of anything he said that was conspiratorial.
00:03:10.920 The accusation was really just,
00:03:12.960 well, he says this stuff
00:03:14.520 and other people have conspiracy theories about them.
00:03:18.040 Yeah, I mean, all you have to do is just play
00:03:20.520 like the clip you played there,
00:03:21.840 which is what's actually funny about that is,
00:03:23.840 you know, the Norwegian lady there 1.00
00:03:25.700 was a lot more honest than most of our politicians.
00:03:28.340 She was at least admitting that the policies she supports
00:03:30.340 are going to cause real pain, right?
00:03:31.680 I mean, you don't see that kind of honesty
00:03:33.320 from the liberal government.
00:03:34.460 I mean, on the one hand, they say,
00:03:35.840 oh, we're very worried about the cost of living.
00:03:37.520 Oh, here's a new carbon tax.
00:03:38.800 You know, here are a bunch of policies
00:03:39.900 that drive up the cost of energy.
00:03:41.660 So they never even have the guts to admit
00:03:43.640 what they're actually doing.
00:03:45.460 But yeah, you know, it's, you know,
00:03:46.880 we've, I think we've seen how this plays out,
00:03:49.200 you know, in, you know, four or five months,
00:03:52.440 there'll be some mainstream media articles saying,
00:03:54.220 well, actually, the web does have
00:03:55.420 some problematic aspects to it.
00:03:56.940 You know, here's why people are legitimately concerned.
00:03:59.100 It's almost like they want to be the ones
00:04:00.620 to get there first to talk about something.
00:04:02.300 And if they don't, then they just dismiss it
00:04:03.940 until they start talking about it.
00:04:05.260 Then it's legitimate.
00:04:06.020 As you say, with COVID, you know,
00:04:07.780 you couldn't bring up the lab leak idea.
00:04:09.400 Oh, no, that's, that's totally, that's, that's insane.
00:04:11.380 Only crazy people will believe that.
00:04:13.660 People got banned from social media
00:04:15.120 for talking about it.
00:04:15.920 People got in serious trouble.
00:04:17.140 And then all of a sudden, you know,
00:04:18.240 a year or two later, you know,
00:04:19.540 New York Times, other, you know,
00:04:21.140 credible publications, you know,
00:04:22.660 as some people see them,
00:04:24.260 they start talking about it.
00:04:25.220 Then, okay, now it's, it's okay to talk about.
00:04:27.100 Now it's okay.
00:04:28.080 And that's a big problem in a free society
00:04:29.800 because the whole point is we're supposed to,
00:04:31.500 you know, find out the truth
00:04:32.480 through debating ideas openly and honestly.
00:04:34.620 And if we just, you know,
00:04:35.760 shut people down for having opinions
00:04:37.520 that are not, you know,
00:04:39.400 that people think are too conspiratorial,
00:04:41.280 then we're not going to get to the truth, right?
00:04:43.980 Yeah, you're, you're quite right about that.
00:04:45.660 And I go back to,
00:04:46.820 I don't know if you were on when I brought it up,
00:04:48.200 this headline in CBC of taking aim at Davos
00:04:52.080 when Trump was there.
00:04:53.160 And they, you know, say,
00:04:54.020 Trump the populist descends on globalist Davos.
00:04:56.820 So when Donald Trump was going there,
00:04:58.700 it was all too easy for the left to criticize this
00:05:01.080 and say, oh yeah, it's these out of touch elites.
00:05:03.120 And now that, you know,
00:05:03.960 it's the right that has concerns with WEF,
00:05:06.480 it seems to be conspiratorial in the same people's eyes.
00:05:09.440 And I can actually fully admit
00:05:10.960 that the left may have been much better
00:05:14.940 at sussing out the problems
00:05:16.600 with this organization many years ago,
00:05:18.140 because it used to be.
00:05:19.400 I mean, Chrystia Freeland,
00:05:20.300 when she was a journalist,
00:05:21.260 wrote the book on this organization
00:05:22.800 and made a lot of very good points about it.
00:05:24.460 And Naomi Klein, who I don't agree with
00:05:26.520 on very many things as well,
00:05:28.500 was a very, very significant critic of this.
00:05:31.560 And a lot of the left-wing protests
00:05:33.940 that there used to be there
00:05:35.820 were kind of the very similar things
00:05:38.320 that we see in like the Bernie Sanders,
00:05:40.260 Donald Trump agreement on, you know,
00:05:42.840 the problems of free trade
00:05:44.060 and the problems of globalization
00:05:45.220 and how it's really become a class struggle
00:05:48.020 in a lot of ways.
00:05:48.840 And I think that there's something perhaps
00:05:50.620 that the right could have learned about that sooner.
00:05:52.360 But it is interesting the way the media
00:05:54.480 responds to these things,
00:05:55.720 because when it was the left
00:05:57.000 raising these criticisms,
00:05:58.580 there was never that I recall
00:06:00.140 any denunciation of them.
00:06:01.520 They were never called conspiracy theorists.
00:06:03.620 But now that the right is raising these concerns
00:06:05.560 or more of the right raising these concerns,
00:06:08.380 it's we have to denounce the denouncers.
00:06:11.500 Yeah, I think a big thing too
00:06:12.960 is that there's been, you know,
00:06:14.280 a not so subtle shift in,
00:06:17.480 I don't know if you want to call it
00:06:18.700 political ideology
00:06:19.520 or the way people talk about things,
00:06:20.900 but, you know, what does it mean to be conservative,
00:06:22.580 you know, liberal, left, right?
00:06:24.020 There's a lot of overlap
00:06:25.000 and a lot of, I think, confusion for people.
00:06:26.800 And so, you know,
00:06:28.340 it used to be very conservative to say,
00:06:29.980 well, you know, keep taxes low,
00:06:31.700 have free trade, you know,
00:06:32.760 be very capitalist and support the free market.
00:06:35.400 I'd still define myself that way.
00:06:36.880 Well, whether that's still considered conservative or not,
00:06:39.100 you know, you're seeing more of a shift towards,
00:06:40.600 you know, state intervention,
00:06:41.900 cultural conservatism in some ways.
00:06:44.080 But I think the media,
00:06:45.320 instead of talking about the nuance,
00:06:46.680 which I guess goes over some of their heads,
00:06:48.220 they just, they look for the easiest,
00:06:49.840 you know, thing they can say,
00:06:50.800 which is, oh, well, fascism,
00:06:52.400 conspiracy theorist,
00:06:53.720 you know, anti-Semitic.
00:06:54.740 I see some people trying to call
00:06:55.960 Polyam anti-Semitic, 0.93
00:06:57.400 which is obviously absurd.
00:06:59.000 And so it's just,
00:06:59.760 a lot of it's just laziness.
00:07:01.020 It's not wanting to delve deeper into the issue,
00:07:02.880 not wanting to deal with any complexity or nuance.
00:07:05.020 It's just,
00:07:05.560 what's the quickest insult I could find
00:07:07.020 to make the whole issue go away
00:07:08.180 or just label someone badly
00:07:09.320 and then people will stop talking about it.
00:07:11.000 So I think that's part of what we're dealing with too,
00:07:12.660 is just very lazy journalism in many cases.
00:07:15.840 What's your thought on how Polyev
00:07:17.660 has been relatively unrepentant?
00:07:19.260 Because I know the last couple of conservative leaders,
00:07:21.400 Aaron O'Toole and Andrew Scheer,
00:07:23.860 were both fairly timid when it came to the media.
00:07:26.740 And they both really buckled
00:07:28.680 when the media was going after them.
00:07:30.660 Whereas Polyev, to his credit,
00:07:32.180 hasn't done that.
00:07:33.060 And even on the WEF stuff,
00:07:34.740 he came out after that CP article
00:07:36.320 and just said,
00:07:36.940 no, it's a hit job. 0.99
00:07:37.780 It's ridiculous. 0.98
00:07:38.460 I'm not buying into it. 0.96
00:07:40.020 Do you think he'll be able to keep that up?
00:07:41.460 And do you think he will keep that up?
00:07:43.720 I think so.
00:07:44.540 I mean, the polls are looking pretty good for him.
00:07:47.260 You know, obviously,
00:07:48.060 that's how he campaigned for the leadership.
00:07:49.720 So I think, you know,
00:07:50.600 I don't see him wanting to change
00:07:52.160 from that perspective.
00:07:53.080 Even if he did,
00:07:53.780 I think he'd face so much pressure
00:07:55.000 because of how he campaigned
00:07:56.380 that he wouldn't really be able to.
00:07:57.680 Not that, of course, he wants to.
00:07:59.460 And, you know,
00:08:00.140 the reason I think it's working,
00:08:01.300 and this is, I think,
00:08:01.960 a deeper point for why the liberals are struggling,
00:08:03.740 is that things are just bad in the country.
00:08:06.480 I mean, you know,
00:08:06.940 we can talk about all the complexities
00:08:08.440 of certain things,
00:08:09.300 but in many cases,
00:08:10.580 people are looking around and saying,
00:08:11.880 well, the liberals have been in power
00:08:13.020 for eight years
00:08:13.700 and things are getting worse.
00:08:15.580 Okay, this guy, Polyev,
00:08:17.120 well, what's he talking about?
00:08:18.240 Okay, you know,
00:08:19.540 we need affordable housing.
00:08:20.520 We need to deal with crime.
00:08:21.420 We need to lower the cost of living. 0.95
00:08:22.700 You know, pretty common sense things.
00:08:24.380 People look at that and say,
00:08:25.260 well, at least this guy's addressing
00:08:26.240 the issues I have.
00:08:27.440 And then they turn on the news
00:08:28.420 and they say,
00:08:28.860 oh, the liberals say Polyev
00:08:29.960 is a dangerous, scary conspiracy theorist.
00:08:32.260 And I think people are just going to start
00:08:33.660 to tune that out.
00:08:34.500 I mean, they've heard it so often.
00:08:36.000 It really doesn't match up with reality.
00:08:38.120 And so I think, you know,
00:08:39.220 I don't, I'm not shocked
00:08:40.780 the liberals are trying this.
00:08:42.200 I mean, they've got to try something, right?
00:08:43.460 In politics,
00:08:43.920 either whatever attack you think
00:08:45.000 is going to work.
00:08:45.820 But they don't really have much left
00:08:47.160 in terms of saying,
00:08:48.180 oh, look, look how great we're doing.
00:08:49.520 Look how great things are for you.
00:08:50.660 Look how affordable everything is.
00:08:52.440 And so the other issue too
00:08:54.800 is much of the establishment media.
00:08:56.480 You know, if you look at Bill C-18,
00:08:57.840 how they're all lining up behind that,
00:08:59.200 despite it being an absolute disaster,
00:09:01.740 they're really just desperate for money.
00:09:03.140 And they know a conservative government
00:09:04.600 is not going to give them a bunch of money,
00:09:06.140 is not going to, you know,
00:09:06.800 restrict social media companies
00:09:08.140 and restrict free speech for their benefit.
00:09:10.740 And so they now have a vested financial interest
00:09:12.880 in trying to keep the liberals in power.
00:09:14.380 So I think it's important to filter,
00:09:15.820 you know, our perception of their coverage
00:09:17.800 through that lens as well,
00:09:19.740 which is that, look,
00:09:20.560 they want the liberals to stay in power
00:09:21.800 because they want the liberals
00:09:22.640 to give them taxpayer dollars
00:09:24.240 and restrict, you know,
00:09:25.240 independent competitors.
00:09:26.320 So that's going to certainly
00:09:27.460 shade their coverage.
00:09:29.500 Yeah.
00:09:29.660 And to be honest,
00:09:30.460 when you talk about how terrible things are
00:09:32.100 for Canadians right now,
00:09:33.440 a lot of these issues exist outside of Canada.
00:09:35.380 And that's a legitimate question
00:09:37.180 of the WEF on a different plane,
00:09:39.180 which is, okay,
00:09:40.020 you guys think that you're solving
00:09:41.300 the world's problems here.
00:09:42.720 Well, you had Putin speaking in 2021
00:09:45.680 and a few months later,
00:09:47.120 Russia invades Ukraine.
00:09:48.520 You had, you know,
00:09:49.840 all these great people
00:09:50.880 in the private sector,
00:09:51.980 in the public sector,
00:09:52.820 talking to each other about solving things
00:09:54.600 and inflation's out of control.
00:09:56.480 We've got Europe that is in 0.86
00:09:58.020 for another very cold winter
00:09:59.220 because of energy issues.
00:10:00.320 So, I mean,
00:10:01.400 even if you don't believe
00:10:02.300 that they're influential,
00:10:03.640 the question is, all right,
00:10:04.440 what are you providing?
00:10:05.500 What service are you providing
00:10:07.240 to world leaders that go there
00:10:08.820 when you failed
00:10:10.260 at the most basic things?
00:10:11.460 And I don't know
00:10:12.260 if there's an answer for that.
00:10:14.380 And, you know,
00:10:14.860 to Canadian leaders,
00:10:15.700 I'd say, why,
00:10:16.860 where's the value proposition?
00:10:18.360 What are you getting for Canadians 1.00
00:10:19.540 when you hang out
00:10:20.740 with these billionaires?
00:10:21.600 Because I've yet to see that.
00:10:23.980 Yeah, I think a big part of it
00:10:25.340 is just, you know,
00:10:26.200 it's like a club for people.
00:10:27.340 You know, you hear,
00:10:29.320 oh, celebrities are going there.
00:10:30.480 You know, politicians are going there.
00:10:31.700 You know, people want to get involved
00:10:32.880 and, you know, be seen there.
00:10:34.380 And, you know,
00:10:35.260 I guess it's some sort
00:10:36.240 of credibility boost in some cases.
00:10:38.240 But I think, you know,
00:10:39.500 a big part of all this
00:10:40.620 is that there's a lot of people
00:10:41.880 who have, you know,
00:10:43.140 their, that's a good way to put it.
00:10:45.940 Their, almost their purpose
00:10:47.160 for living in many ways
00:10:49.040 is all about being involved
00:10:50.320 in some sort of, you know,
00:10:51.220 world historical battle
00:10:52.520 or, you know,
00:10:53.040 being a historical figure.
00:10:53.980 I think Stephen Gilbeau
00:10:55.280 is a good example of that.
00:10:57.920 He obviously sees himself
00:10:59.120 as some sort of heroic figure
00:11:00.500 who, oh, it doesn't matter
00:11:01.460 how many, you know,
00:11:02.160 people he hurts, you know,
00:11:03.260 economically,
00:11:03.860 it's all for the greater good.
00:11:05.120 As he mentioned earlier,
00:11:06.060 the so-called greater good
00:11:07.520 that a lot of politicians
00:11:08.860 use to do things
00:11:09.700 that aren't really good ideas.
00:11:10.980 And so he's obviously sure
00:11:12.340 that he's the good guy.
00:11:13.340 He doesn't question himself at all.
00:11:14.940 You know, he just gets
00:11:15.580 more and more aggressive,
00:11:16.540 you know, more restrictions on energy,
00:11:18.680 more bans on plastic
00:11:19.880 and everything, you know,
00:11:20.860 make people's life
00:11:21.840 more difficult
00:11:22.320 for the greater good
00:11:23.080 to save the planet.
00:11:24.540 And so, you know,
00:11:25.100 Davos, I think,
00:11:25.780 gives people a chance
00:11:26.620 to congregate
00:11:27.260 and feel like
00:11:28.180 they're being part of something, right?
00:11:29.440 Oh, they're part of, you know,
00:11:30.300 reshaping the world
00:11:31.120 and saving the planet.
00:11:32.580 And so, you know,
00:11:33.480 when they're told,
00:11:34.280 well, actually, you know,
00:11:35.120 nothing you do is working.
00:11:36.300 It's only making things worse
00:11:37.460 and people don't really like you
00:11:38.960 and don't want to hear
00:11:39.780 this kind of stuff,
00:11:40.820 they're not just going to give in, right?
00:11:42.080 Because it's their whole,
00:11:42.860 you know,
00:11:43.020 their whole purpose
00:11:43.620 is built up in that.
00:11:45.020 And so I think that's something
00:11:47.180 we need to look at
00:11:47.920 for, you know,
00:11:48.880 the types of people we elected,
00:11:50.220 types of people
00:11:50.840 we trust in the position of power
00:11:52.640 is you don't really want people
00:11:54.820 who think that they're
00:11:55.640 saving the planet
00:11:56.680 or that they're, you know,
00:11:57.460 some big historical figure.
00:11:58.640 You want someone who
00:11:59.260 wants to manage the government well,
00:12:01.260 you know, keep taxes low,
00:12:02.620 have services be relatively effective.
00:12:04.620 You don't want people
00:12:05.560 who have some sort of
00:12:06.460 massive mission in mind.
00:12:07.980 And so I think that's part
00:12:09.220 of what the whole Davos thing is.
00:12:10.580 I mean, obviously,
00:12:11.300 Klaus Schwab, you know,
00:12:12.500 I think he does sometimes
00:12:13.880 talk up his own influence
00:12:15.020 because that's, you know,
00:12:15.680 where his sense of purpose
00:12:16.500 comes from is, you know,
00:12:17.580 he's orchestrating everything
00:12:18.780 around the world.
00:12:19.460 I'm sure it makes him feel good
00:12:20.400 to see people say that about him.
00:12:22.140 But, you know,
00:12:22.800 if the weft was really
00:12:23.680 running everything,
00:12:24.420 I think they'd be a little
00:12:25.140 more careful and subtle about it.
00:12:26.580 I mean, would you pick
00:12:27.320 Klaus Schwab,
00:12:28.060 who basically seems like
00:12:29.340 a villain ripped out
00:12:30.140 about a James Bond movie?
00:12:31.420 Would he really be
00:12:32.020 the front man for it?
00:12:32.960 I mean, a little too
00:12:33.780 on the nose sometimes, I think.
00:12:35.240 Well, yeah, yeah,
00:12:35.780 you're right about that.
00:12:36.920 And that's the problem.
00:12:37.660 I mean, it's like,
00:12:38.200 even if the WEF is not
00:12:39.880 the shadowy global cabal
00:12:41.940 of people running the world,
00:12:43.600 man, do they not do much
00:12:44.900 to dissuade people
00:12:45.840 from taking that image.
00:12:47.080 It's like right out
00:12:47.760 of central casting.
00:12:48.600 And like, you know,
00:12:49.380 it's a future that's built by us.
00:12:50.760 It's like, yeah, okay, fine, fine.
00:12:52.560 Spencer Fernando,
00:12:53.480 independent journalist extraordinaire.
00:12:55.080 You can get his work
00:12:55.880 at spencerfernando.com.
00:12:58.180 Always good to talk to you, Spencer.
00:12:59.520 Thanks for coming on.
00:13:00.700 No problem.
00:13:01.120 Take care.
00:13:01.500 Thanks for listening
00:13:02.160 to The Andrew Lawton Show.
00:13:03.940 Support the program
00:13:04.680 by donating to True North
00:13:05.920 at www.tnc.news.
00:13:08.600 .
00:13:08.820 News.
00:13:09.060 .
00:13:09.240 News.
00:13:10.200 .
00:13:11.260 .
00:13:12.120 wa lại
00:13:17.360 .