Juno News - November 25, 2023


The Alberta Roundup is back!


Episode Stats

Length

14 minutes

Words per Minute

222.85796

Word Count

3,142

Sentence Count

1

Misogynist Sentences

5

Hate Speech Sentences

1


Summary


Transcript

00:00:00.000 hey everyone we are back i know you guys missed me it's been a long time so we have a lot of
00:00:16.240 news to cover today but before we get started i just wanted to share that yes i had a successful
00:00:21.280 delivery in early september and my husband and i are so thankful to welcome our little baby boy
00:00:26.960 so i know you guys would be curious about that maybe i'll share some more news in later weeks but
00:00:31.040 for now we are going to move to some alberta coverage now rather ironically my first episode
00:00:36.560 back in about four months yes i'm not in my studio i'm not in alberta i'm actually in toronto i had to
00:00:42.320 fly in for some very important work and so today i will be joined by my colleague andrew lawton i'm
00:00:48.640 in toronto we were uh very busy at the arcade yesterday playing some games i'm a little
00:00:54.000 embarrassed to admit that andrew actually crushed me in dance dance revolution i did that came out
00:00:58.400 of nowhere but i did crush you in some other games like i think connect four yeah which is more of a
00:01:03.920 strategy game so i don't know what that says about you that i'm a better dancer but i have no strategic
00:01:08.080 mind that is not something anyone watching would have expected no i think maybe the opposite is what
00:01:12.320 they would have expected actually but it was good welcome back yes thank you very much it was a proud
00:01:16.560 moment for me winning that game because i think you went into it with strategy and i was just hoping not
00:01:20.560 to lose yeah i also think that you like have confused people by saying you flew to ontario to
00:01:24.960 go to an arcade with me well that's pretty much what happened fair enough yeah we're here for the
00:01:29.040 christmas retreat so it's been a good time seeing all our colleagues again so there's been a lot going
00:01:33.840 on in alberta since i last took off andrew's been covering some of that so we're going to dig into it
00:01:38.960 and you guys will be happy to know there's actually been some really positive news stories we
00:01:42.320 actually have a lot of good strong news stories for you today i think you guys are going to be excited
00:01:46.000 with what we have starting off alberta premier danielle smith announced that she is finally
00:01:51.120 dismantling alberta health services of course we know that she was so critical of the covet 19
00:01:56.160 pandemics so they're going to be broken down into four different bodies ahs is going to be broken down
00:01:59.920 into acute care primary care continuing care and mental health and addiction now smith said the current
00:02:06.400 system that's been in place for about 14 years since former premier eds delamac put that in place when
00:02:11.360 under his progressive conservative government forgot the patient and the experts andrew i'm
00:02:16.960 wondering do you think this could result in the kind of changes that would ensure that a body like
00:02:21.840 ahs couldn't just impose these radical restrictions like the ones seen during the covet 19 pandemic
00:02:27.680 yes and no i mean i think that like anything else you still have to look at who's in charge of these
00:02:32.160 things and you know where the restrictions would be coming from i i think that what it might do and
00:02:37.440 certainly what danielle smith has said she hopes it's going to do is make the body more efficient
00:02:41.520 so it's not really a stopgap against restrictions i think that's going to come from some of the
00:02:46.000 reforms that she's put in place on where authority comes from in in public health settings but as far
00:02:53.360 as ahs i think that you have a very bloated and bureaucratic institution and you know quite frankly i
00:02:59.520 think she's blown it up in in a significant way here i think there's obviously a risk that each of
00:03:04.160 these pillars could go that same road and become its own bureaucracy but i think a lot of that will
00:03:08.080 come down to the management of it and i know that health care has been a huge priority for her
00:03:13.280 not just in government but even when she was really advocating in media and civil society so
00:03:18.080 i'm hoping this is going to be something that if it works could serve as a bit of a road map to
00:03:22.560 other provinces yeah and i think that's something that was said the government said when they
00:03:26.880 announced this they were asked you know are there any other provinces that are doing this right
00:03:29.920 now and they said no we're leading the way we're being new and innovative so absolutely that could
00:03:33.840 be the case now we know the opposition ndp has been very critical of this move they said that
00:03:38.560 this is just going to lead to more privatization of health care of course the age old tale now do
00:03:43.840 you think that's the case and if there was more privatization would that even be a bad thing
00:03:47.360 considering the bloating in the systems and also just the extreme wait times that we're seeing you
00:03:51.600 know we're having a lot of people just going to the emergency room because they can't get the family
00:03:54.800 doctor wait times up to 11 hours at point this is just really unacceptable for canadians and for the
00:04:00.320 costs that they pay for the system that's not getting results for them i mean when people say
00:04:04.800 the p word private a lot of the times they don't really know what they're talking about because we
00:04:10.560 have in the healthcare system in alberta and elsewhere a lot of private delivery but you're
00:04:15.280 still not paying for it it's still not a fee-based service it's just that the government has found a
00:04:19.600 private vendor that's able to provide this service and i think in a lot of cases that works quite well
00:04:24.720 we know that a lot of these organizations are able to specialize they do very well and but you get
00:04:30.000 these activists and a lot of them in the ndp in the unions that are just terrified of anything private
00:04:35.280 and they use that as this big you know ominous dark cloud over any policy discussion now i mean look
00:04:41.440 danielle smith one of her initial ideas during the leadership for the ucp was that she wanted to expand
00:04:47.200 universal health care she wanted to add a health spending account so people had more opportunities to
00:04:52.400 using public dollars get health care services that even now aren't covered so the idea that
00:04:58.320 she's trying to make it where we're going to have this free-for-all health care system where people
00:05:03.040 will have to pay and they're going to go broke that's sort of the fear-mongering from the ndp
00:05:07.280 but it's just not aligned with any policy that's been proposed or enacted by this government
00:05:12.960 another big story that we saw in recent months was the supreme court ruled that bill c69 was largely
00:05:18.640 unconstitutional you know conservatives around the country really celebrated at this we know that
00:05:23.360 former premier jason kenney called this the no more pipelines bill danielle smith was even a little
00:05:27.760 bit stronger she said this is the no more major project ever again in alberta i remember seeing
00:05:33.040 her during the ucp leadership race and she was talking to a crowd just outside of edmonton and she
00:05:37.360 said you know we have to get permission from the federal government to build highway over a certain
00:05:41.520 amount of kilometers so this bill was really restrictive everyone was very celebrated when we got this
00:05:45.520 ruling from the supreme court and then environment minister stephen gilbeau came out and said well
00:05:50.320 you know the supreme court ruling that was really an opinion have we ever heard something
00:05:54.720 like this from the federal government where they took a ruling from the supreme court and said this
00:05:57.840 is just an opinion well only when they lose because when they win it's well this is authoritative
00:06:02.640 and like we knew the supreme court called it yeah when they lose it's like they've just basically
00:06:07.600 had some think tank report come in it's well yeah we'll take a look at it and we'll you know read and
00:06:12.000 maybe section one has something good and you know maybe section five has something good but they've
00:06:17.360 really decided they're going to plow ahead with this and remember it was similar on the plastics
00:06:22.000 ban when the federal court just uh what was it last week or two weeks ago came out and said that the
00:06:26.800 government's plastics ban was unconstitutional uh the federal government still was very defiant on
00:06:31.760 this and said well no we're going to appeal and we're going to make it work and canadians want this so
00:06:36.160 it's really i think a bullheaded and pig-headed way of intruding into jurisdiction that doesn't
00:06:41.040 belong to the federal government and i think politically it helps alberta a great deal
00:06:45.440 because they can look at stephen gilbo and say see this is what we're up against so that's one of
00:06:50.960 the positives from gilbo's response i guess you know the provinces can point out the contradiction
00:06:56.080 of the federal government and really just their unreasonableness but at the same time what recourse
00:07:00.240 through provinces then have if the federal government isn't even willing to take the supreme court seriously
00:07:04.880 well i look i think that you're going to see more of these standoffs i mean saskatchewan has
00:07:11.600 started advancing on this like we're just not going to you know collect the taxes and you know
00:07:15.680 that's something that you know you get the andrew coins of the world that get very pearl clutchy about
00:07:20.160 and is it legal or not i don't know but it's certainly not constructive to have that relationship
00:07:24.880 between provinces and the federal government and i think that that's going to be ultimately what we see
00:07:29.920 more of here which is provinces doing things that are kind of walking right up to the line or maybe
00:07:35.600 even going over the line because they want to respond in kind and look if a province is looking
00:07:40.400 at the federal government and say well if you're not going to respect your constitutional obligations
00:07:44.240 why should we and that's not what canada is supposed to be about but i do think it's the inevitable
00:07:49.600 byproduct of that tension between the levels of government and i don't blame provinces for doing that
00:07:54.480 because if the federal government wants to just treat the constitution as a list of suggestions
00:07:59.120 why shouldn't they another big story you mentioned it was the plastic span i was so excited when i
00:08:04.880 saw that this was being overturned i'm so sick and tired of these gross paper straws that get all soggy
00:08:10.640 i just don't even use them anymore and also the reusable bags i can never remember to bring mine to
00:08:15.200 the grocery store my pantry is full like our house is going to be filled with these reusable bags that
00:08:18.960 we never actually use so so this was a very good thing do you think we're going to see plastic bags
00:08:22.960 and plastic store straws back in stores and restaurants soon plastic straws maybe because i they're very
00:08:28.560 popular and they're actually disabled i mean people with disabilities had an exemption from the
00:08:33.600 plastic straw ban which kind of made it ridiculous uh just because it was inconsistent plastic bags
00:08:38.800 i don't think are coming back i think a lot of the big grocery chains of which they're only like
00:08:42.640 what four or five in canada have already taken this dependency they're making money off of these
00:08:47.920 reusable bags that we all forget they get to claim oh well we're being environmental on our own
00:08:52.960 without the regulations so the government kind of gets the best of both worlds here because they've made the
00:08:57.040 change even without having the law on the books still so another story i don't know if you caught
00:09:02.800 this this might be a surprise when this didn't get a lot of media attention but rajansani she is the
00:09:07.680 advanced education minister she came out and said that the ucp membership needs re-education now she said
00:09:14.880 this after the annual general meeting in which the membership passed some policies that basically said
00:09:20.000 we want diversity equity and inclusion out of universities now of course policies pass at the agm they're
00:09:25.120 non-binding the government can decide whether or not they want to proceed with those rajansani said
00:09:29.680 you know the base needs to be educated and she basically said uh we're going to take a look at
00:09:34.960 these i'm going to do what's best for the province at the end of the day actually her exact quote here
00:09:38.000 i just thought it was funny says i think it's always important to have conversations and have the
00:09:42.560 opportunities to educate on exactly what some of these initiatives are as they relate to dei so a whole
00:09:48.800 bunch of words out there that doesn't really mean anything but i thought this was offensive i think we've
00:09:53.280 moved past a time when we can have politicians preaching at us and telling us as conservatives
00:09:57.840 what we need to believe i think that conservative membership is really tired of being told that
00:10:02.560 they're offensive and they need to be re-educated and what makes this worse is that rajansani wasn't
00:10:06.720 even she didn't even win a nomination she was appointed in the riding she currently represents i
00:10:10.720 don't know that she has a lot of support i think she was given that appointment because she has
00:10:15.200 favoritism with the premier and i think she might have just burned that favoritism what's your take on this
00:10:19.360 it's weird i mean i hadn't heard the quote and like as you described it it's very ambiguous is
00:10:25.440 she saying people need to be educated about why these programs are good or educated about why they're
00:10:29.760 bad or is she saying something just because she knows people will read into it either way i i don't
00:10:34.240 think anyone lecturing the base is going to go over well i think that you as a politician are there to
00:10:41.280 serve and anytime you get into that mindset of uh the people know wrong or the people are wrong and i know
00:10:47.040 better even if you think you do know better it's not the way you lead so i i think on this we're
00:10:53.360 seeing a turn across the province against this sort of program i mean those motions were passed
00:11:00.000 very decisively these were not just like on the edge and if she's turning around and saying to those
00:11:06.000 people you're wrong well you're in the wrong party then because clearly you and the base are at
00:11:10.960 a lockstep on a pretty key issue well not just that the idea that we're going to ignore the membership
00:11:15.840 and i'm going to do what's best for the province what's the point of being there to govern what's
00:11:19.600 the point of putting conservative politicians in if they're not going to govern as conservative
00:11:23.520 once they're actively elected i'm tired of that we've seen it time and time again well and what's
00:11:27.360 the point of having a member-driven policy process yeah exactly i think things are changing i think
00:11:31.520 she's going to realize this was a really unpopular move pretty soon okay the last thing i want to touch
00:11:35.440 on is the alberta pension plan the alberta government has finally announced they want to pull out their
00:11:40.080 assets they're claiming they have well over 300 billion of the assets so that's over half of the total
00:11:45.280 pension assets now the federal government doesn't agree they say that's not a correct number they've
00:11:49.840 been asked to provide their number but they won't so eventually this is going to go to a referendum
00:11:55.200 hopefully but before that can happen people need to know what the number is that they're actually
00:11:59.040 going to be deciding on so where do you see this going well i mean just picturing pierre paulievre
00:12:05.200 like at that leadership debate to jean chariot just the number just the number just the number like
00:12:09.840 you're right the number you need to have as the starting point because that's going to color this and
00:12:14.160 i think that for a lot of albertans this is going to be a decision they make based on sovereignty and
00:12:20.240 independence you know we just want as many things as we possibly can to be in our wheelhouse and to
00:12:26.080 get the federal government out on the pension plan i think the decision should be made based on
00:12:30.720 economics i don't actually think it should be made on sovereignty i think that sovereignty empowers
00:12:35.680 that decision but you should look at what is economically in your best interest and with that
00:12:40.480 the number is incredibly important because if you know you have half the pension assets
00:12:46.000 that are being distributed to the entire country well you're better off on your own if that number
00:12:51.600 isn't accurate let's say the share the alberta share is 10 or 20 whatever the number is that changes
00:12:58.160 the calculation for a lot of voters dramatically so my presumption would be that you can't have an
00:13:03.600 informed vote in a referendum based just on the alberta number when that number is in dispute so
00:13:08.720 i don't know if there's anything they can do to compel the federal government to do an assessment
00:13:12.800 but that needs to happen i wonder if it will result in litigation eventually to compel the federal
00:13:18.000 government to produce that number decide on something and then to have the referendum if i
00:13:22.560 if i can just imagine if you went to the bank and the bank wouldn't tell you how much money you had
00:13:26.480 in your account i mean it wouldn't go over well yeah like that that and that's kind of what we're at
00:13:30.720 now it's i this is alberta they have a right to leave no one disputes they have a right to leave
00:13:35.360 which means they have a right to know how much is theirs in that well it seems like this policy
00:13:40.160 proposal isn't super popular in the province at the time based on recent polling but like i said
00:13:44.000 i think it'll be quite some time before that referendum is held so the provincial government
00:13:47.760 has a lot of time to sway voters all right everyone i hope you enjoy that little alberta
00:13:52.000 rounder from the last couple months next week we'll be back to our regular programming thank you
00:13:56.000 so much for joining me today andrew thank you okay see you guys next week
00:14:05.360 you