Juno News - March 20, 2020


The Candice Malcolm Show: China’s evil acts


Episode Stats

Length

32 minutes

Words per Minute

189.88495

Word Count

6,250

Sentence Count

331

Hate Speech Sentences

27


Summary

Candice Malan talks about the Wuhan Virus, the China Virus, and why we should call it what it is: The China Virus. She also talks about Justin Trudeau's gamble to shut down the global economy, and authoritarian elites cracking down on our freedom.


Transcript

00:00:00.240 China's evil acts, Justin Trudeau's major missteps, the gamble to shut down the global
00:00:05.840 economy, and authoritarian elites cracking down on our freedom. Hello from self-quarantine,
00:00:11.360 I'm Candice Malcolm and this is The Candice Malcolm Show.
00:00:19.680 Hi everyone, thank you so much for tuning into the show. We are doing a live broadcast today
00:00:24.800 for several reasons, partially just because everyone is in self-isolation
00:00:28.800 and self-quarantine, so I didn't want to have the team go into our True North office. I thought it'd
00:00:33.040 be a lot easier to just record my show live, you know, I'm in a room by myself, I can't possibly
00:00:38.720 get anyone sick or have anyone get me sick, which is the major concern right now. I think it is probably
00:00:45.360 pretty prudent advice for people to be self-isolating just given what we know about this virus and how
00:00:50.400 quickly and how easily it can spread. That being said though, I think that a lot of the measures
00:00:55.680 that are being implemented and being suggested are pretty scary, that if they had been suggested
00:01:01.120 or tried to be implemented under any other circumstances, we would be crying from the
00:01:05.520 rooftop demanding that our freedoms be upheld, but because there is this health crisis and because
00:01:10.640 nobody really knows, we don't have the full information, we don't have the full picture,
00:01:14.880 we still are learning more and more about this disease, you know, it's better to just be cautious
00:01:20.240 and stay at home. So let me know where you're watching this broadcast from, let me know whether
00:01:25.440 you're taking the quarantine seriously and whether you are yourself in self-isolation or whether you're
00:01:33.200 still going about your day-to-day, whether your job permits you to work at home or whether you can or
00:01:39.680 whether you still have to go out into the workforce, whether you still have to commute and go into the
00:01:44.400 office. I guess it depends on where you live. I think that the approach so far in Canada has been fairly good,
00:01:49.520 that it's sort of the provinces that are taking the lead and, you know, not the federal government
00:01:54.800 that's saying, you know, we're in a state of emergency and everyone has to stay at home.
00:01:58.080 Because to be perfectly honest, if you live in Toronto like I do and there is a major outbreak,
00:02:02.960 or if you live in Vancouver where we know that there has been a major outbreak, you're probably going
00:02:07.360 to be a lot more cautious than, say, if you live, you know, on the Sunshine Coast in British Columbia,
00:02:13.600 or if you live in northern Alberta, or if you live somewhere more rural where you're not really that likely
00:02:19.360 to interact with people. I think it really does depend on where you live. But as we know,
00:02:24.800 this virus travels fast and easily and people can get infected and carry it everywhere. I think
00:02:30.880 every single province now has reported cases of this thing. So there's been a lot of talk recently
00:02:40.720 about what we should be calling this thing. I talked about this on my broadcast, I guess it was two
00:02:46.880 weeks ago now. Oh, no, sorry, it was last week, last week, where I criticized Donald Trump for calling
00:02:52.800 it the China virus. He retweeted Charlie Kirk, who called it the China virus. And I thought that they
00:02:58.000 were being sort of unnecessarily provocative. And, you know, sometimes conservatives do this thing where they
00:03:04.320 sort of almost pretend to be ignorant, but they're really doing it on purpose. And I kind of cringed
00:03:10.560 at that. So I felt like, you know, we should try to call things what they are. This flu originated in
00:03:16.640 Wuhan. It is, you know, everyone knew about it, because it was it was hitting this city called Wuhan,
00:03:22.720 which, to be perfectly honest, most people had never heard of Wuhan before the actual Wuhan virus. So,
00:03:28.800 you know, we should try to use words that are the most accurate as possible. China is a huge,
00:03:33.280 massive country with over a billion people. It happened a very specific part of China. So I
00:03:38.160 thought, you know, we should call it the Wuhan virus, rather than the China virus. I'll admit it,
00:03:43.280 I've kind of had a change of heart, I think that China is a incredibly bad actor on the world stage.
00:03:49.120 And we're learning more and more and more about how they suppressed this illness, how they tried to
00:03:54.000 cover it up, how the massive missteps that they made at the beginning, when this news was just first
00:04:00.720 coming out of this virus really caused long term damage. If it wasn't for China, this thing wouldn't
00:04:06.560 have even existed. So sure, I think we should call it the China virus. I think that people who are
00:04:11.280 getting up in arms right now over political correctness, you know, the World Health Organization
00:04:15.360 said that it was unfair and it caused stigma. Look, it's not the Chinese people's fault. It is the
00:04:20.640 Chinese government's fault. It is the communist Chinese government's fault. And, you know, if we want
00:04:26.720 to call this the Chinese virus, to put stigma and to put pressure on the government to stop doing
00:04:32.240 these kind of things in the future, to crack down on these wet markets, which seems to be the origin
00:04:37.760 of this virus, then I think that's good enough reason for the international community to come
00:04:44.560 together. Instead, we have these sort of nagging left-wing voices saying, don't call it that, call it
00:04:49.760 COVID-19, which is a technical term. It's an acronym. It just stands for coronavirus disease,
00:04:58.240 and then 19 is the year that it originated, 2019. You know, that's not really like the way that
00:05:04.080 people use language colloquially. We usually describe something that helps us understand what
00:05:08.960 it is. So the Wuhan virus, everyone knows it originated in Wuhan. I would be forecalling it the
00:05:14.720 Chinese bat virus, or the Wuhan bat virus, so that that connotation, you know, do not eat bats,
00:05:21.520 do not handle bats. It's a very, very bad idea for human beings to be touching and eating bats.
00:05:29.520 You know, that should be very, very basic knowledge. But we should, you know, use terms that mean
00:05:35.040 something. And, you know, coronavirus is a general term to describe a type of disease. So it's not specific
00:05:42.640 at all to what is happening here. Again, I'll admit, when I think I said something that is wrong,
00:05:49.040 and I do think I was wrong before to criticize Trump for saying the China virus, because I do think
00:05:55.200 China is a bad act, and we're learning more and more about this. A report that came out yesterday found
00:06:01.680 that China could have reduced this outbreak by 95% if they had acted earlier, they had acted sooner.
00:06:10.080 So the research found that if interventions in China could have been conducted just one week
00:06:16.080 earlier, one week or two weeks or three weeks earlier, cases could have been reduced by 66%,
00:06:21.840 86%, or 95%, significantly limiting the geographical spread of this disease. So all the Chinese government
00:06:29.360 had to do was act quickly, be honest about what was happening, and crack down on this. But of course,
00:06:36.320 because it's China, it's a communist dictatorship, that's not what they did. They tried to cover it
00:06:40.080 up, they lied about what it was, they didn't allow information to leave the country, they crack down
00:06:44.640 on individuals who are trying to blow the whistle, they crack down on journalists who are trying to
00:06:48.480 report on this thing. And because of those decisions, we now have a global pandemic, a global health
00:06:54.800 emergency that will probably kill thousands and thousands of people. Well, it already has killed
00:06:59.760 thousands and thousands of people, probably kill many, many more. And it's all because of China's decision
00:07:06.000 to keep this under wraps. So even after Chinese President Xi Jinping personally ordered officials
00:07:13.680 to control the outbreak on January 7th, authorities in China kept denying it could spread between humans,
00:07:19.680 something doctors had known had been happening since late December. And they went ahead with the
00:07:24.640 Chinese Lunar New Year Banquet involving tens of thousands of families in Wuhan. So that one decision
00:07:31.680 to allow that lunar banquet involving tens of thousands of families in Wuhan really is what led to the
00:07:37.680 massive outbreak. The Chinese government lied about it, they knew that it was something that could be
00:07:43.520 transmitted from humans, they've known about it since 2019, possibly as early as November 2019. And yet,
00:07:50.080 they lied about it, they lied about it, they continued to say that that we should be able to,
00:07:55.120 you know, the people in China should be able to just go about their regular lives. And because of
00:07:59.200 that, we have a huge global pandemic. So we should blame China, we should, we should call it as it is,
00:08:06.640 this is this is their fault. And they continued to crack down on journalists who are trying to report
00:08:11.200 the truth. They continued to push propaganda and lies. So no, we shouldn't avoid calling it the China
00:08:18.000 virus just because we want to stop the stigma. Now, of course, this isn't saying, again, this isn't
00:08:22.400 saying that Chinese individuals are to blame. No, it's the government of China. This isn't, the two
00:08:28.160 things are separate, just like you can criticize, you know, the government of Iran and call that an
00:08:32.640 evil regime without somehow saying that all of the people of Iran are at fault, or saying that you
00:08:38.320 hate the people of Iran. No, you hate the government of Iran. Same thing with China. So again, really,
00:08:44.320 really disheartening stuff. And in the midst of all this, we learned that Canada is sending aid
00:08:50.720 to China. Canada gave 16 tons of medical supplies to China. This is in the Toronto Sun, my colleague
00:08:58.160 Anthony Fury. On February 9th, Global Affairs Canada announced that to support China's ongoing
00:09:03.840 response to the outbreak, Canada has developed approximately 16 tons of personal protective
00:09:08.480 equipment, such as clothing, face shields, masks, goggles, gloves, and has given it to the country
00:09:13.440 since February 2020. Canada's first case was identified on January 25th. And by that time,
00:09:20.000 we started shipping equipment to China. We'd already had five confirmed cases. So why is Canada
00:09:25.760 giving aid to China? Like China is, by most accounts, a way bigger country than Canada. Their GDP
00:09:32.400 is almost eight times bigger than ours. And they are the reason why this disease is here. Canada itself
00:09:38.480 might not have the capacity, we are struggling, and really concerned that in a couple weeks time,
00:09:43.600 if the growth of this virus is continues in the exponential manner that we've seen, that we won't
00:09:50.160 have enough medical equipment. And yet we're sending resources to China, the person that the regime,
00:09:55.680 the country that started all this. It's just absolutely mind boggling hard to understand. Thanks,
00:10:02.480 everyone who's watching live right now. Again, let me know where you're watching from. Let me know if
00:10:06.960 you're doing self-quarantine and if you buy into the whole idea that we all have to stay at home and
00:10:12.320 we can't go outside. What you think about all this? I think that there's almost kind of a generational
00:10:18.000 divide. My own parents who live in in North Vancouver aren't really taking this very seriously.
00:10:24.480 Every time I try to send them articles and kind of encourage them to stay inside,
00:10:28.320 they kind of like just know that they're not interested. My dad is still going golfing every
00:10:34.560 day. Every day we can that there's not frost on the course, which, you know, of all the places you
00:10:39.600 could be going, I guess a golf course is pretty isolated and you're not exactly interacting with
00:10:44.240 a lot of people. But still, I mean, if you're in that high risk group, which my dad and stepmoms are,
00:10:51.440 I certainly would be cautious. I'm not even in that risk group and I'm pretty paranoid. I haven't
00:10:56.000 left the house in over a week and I think that it's probably a good idea to at least self-isolate.
00:11:01.840 Okay, I want to talk about Justin Trudeau and his response. So, you know, everyone's sort of praising
00:11:09.200 him for giving these daily updates, addressing the country and staying calm in this time of sort of
00:11:16.800 chaos. I think that there have been some major, major missteps, though, that the Trudeau government
00:11:21.600 has done. And I want to talk about those now. I think that it's good that they've finally closed
00:11:26.640 the borders, although there's just so many exemptions that it's hard to really say they've
00:11:30.800 closed the borders. Like they said, okay, the borders closed to all non-citizens, non-permanent
00:11:36.880 residents, but then they included Americans in there at first. And then they also included like
00:11:41.520 airline staff and all these other groups. And then we found out that if you cross the border
00:11:46.320 illegally and claim asylum, you're also still allowed to stay and come into Canada, which is just sort
00:11:52.400 contradictory of the whole idea that we don't want foreign nationals. Then they closed the
00:11:57.040 border to the United States, except for there were all these exemptions for anyone doing trade,
00:12:00.720 anyone shipping. Obviously, we don't want to disrupt the supply lines, especially when so many people
00:12:05.920 are desperate to get out and get the supplies, get the food that they need, the groceries.
00:12:11.280 There's been a lot of shortages. I know my husband went out to the Loblaws up the street
00:12:16.640 last night, and he said that the shelves were pretty empty. There was no dairy whatsoever in
00:12:21.600 the store, all the eggs, milk, everything was gone. So obviously, we don't want to disrupt the supply
00:12:27.200 lines in Canada and America and the US. Our economies are so integrated. But still, I think
00:12:33.120 that the fact that Trudeau is just doing this now, just finally coming around to the fact that we
00:12:37.280 should close our border and really take this seriously, it's just, you know, it's almost too late.
00:12:44.080 Other countries were doing it a week, two weeks earlier. We saw what happened in Italy. Italy should
00:12:49.040 have been like a big wake-up call to everyone in the West. You know, the other countries that had
00:12:53.280 been hit prior were all sort of secretive, closed, authoritarian regimes. I'm talking about China
00:12:59.600 and Iran. You know, there was also South Korea and other countries that are a little bit more open
00:13:04.960 in Asia. But really, what happened in Italy was a glimpse at, wow, you know, this is what happens
00:13:10.560 in a free Western society. Their healthcare was absolutely overrun. People didn't take the warning
00:13:15.760 seriously at first until it was kind of too late. And there was just so many sick people that they
00:13:20.480 just couldn't feasibly handle it all. And the healthcare system was really beginning to crumble.
00:13:25.040 It was sort of scary. And if you've read any of the articles written by doctors or people that were
00:13:30.880 at the hospitals, it just seems like a very, very chaotic scene. And so at that point, it was pretty
00:13:36.640 obvious that we should shut down our borders and implement some kind of a self-isolation regime.
00:13:42.240 The Trudeau government said, no, no, borders can't stop this disease. And so they continued to leave
00:13:48.320 them open. And even within Canada, once they made the edict to close the borders and to say non-citizens
00:13:57.840 and non-permit residents can't come, they still said that it was okay to travel within Canada.
00:14:03.120 Well, part of the problem is that when you're experiencing an outbreak in Toronto and Vancouver,
00:14:08.240 and then you tell Canadians like, hey, you can still travel as you wish within Canada,
00:14:12.480 what you're going to do is take the viruses that are in those two cities and spread them
00:14:16.480 throughout the country. And that is exactly what we have seen. There was a large dental conference in
00:14:21.600 Vancouver on March 5th through 7th, where about 20,000 people were in attendance. And they've
00:14:29.840 identified that some cases came from that dental conference and have now been spread all around
00:14:35.600 Canada. There's cases, like I said, in every single province. So why wouldn't the Trudeau government
00:14:39.600 have locked down all travel at that point? We know that that's how the virus spreads. It spreads from
00:14:44.320 people who travel and then come back to a new community. That's how it travels. And so the idea
00:14:49.280 that even at the time the government was saying, go ahead and travel within Canada, I think was a grave
00:14:54.320 mistake and helped the spread. And that's part of the reason why we have the huge growth in Canada. So
00:15:00.000 I guess we can give Trudeau credit for now finally taking some steps towards closing the borders.
00:15:06.800 But really, I think it could have easily been, these decisions could have easily been made two weeks
00:15:11.600 ago, and Canadians would have been a lot more safe. Let me know what you think, whether you think that
00:15:20.320 the Canadian government should have closed the border earlier, whether you think we should be in total
00:15:24.240 isolation, or whether you think this whole thing is overblown. And there's one thing I want to talk
00:15:31.040 about. I feel like even though I personally am taking a lot of measures to stay safe, keep distance
00:15:37.200 from people, especially, you know, I think, you know, I don't really want to go and see my in-laws
00:15:43.360 because I worry about their health. They're a little bit older. I wouldn't go into a grocery store at
00:15:47.840 this point. In case you can't tell, I'm a little under the weather, I'm a little congested. And I
00:15:53.760 had a little bit of a fever earlier in the week. So I wouldn't take any risks at all in leaving the
00:15:58.800 house. Even within my house, I try to keep distance from my family that are here so that I can
00:16:06.080 avoid getting other people sick. But I think that, you know, a lot of the questions when you watch the
00:16:11.280 media briefings that are happening, a lot of the questions from journalists keep going towards,
00:16:16.000 you know, should we start fining people? Should we start arresting people who are not listening to
00:16:20.400 the advice to self-quarantine, to self-isolate? And I think that there's like a little bit of an
00:16:25.440 authoritarian impulse that so many people, especially in the media and in the government, have. You know,
00:16:30.400 first of all, they think that we should all be ruled by experts, so-called experts. The problem
00:16:35.520 is that experts are often wrong. And, you know, who are the experts? Who are the ones that we're
00:16:39.920 talking about? This usually comes down to government employees. So we're talking about government
00:16:45.600 kind of having control top down over everybody that their decisions stand. What, you know,
00:16:49.920 what about the idea that you might be able to challenge an expert or that someone who claims
00:16:53.840 to be an expert might not be the most knowledgeable person on that topic? I think that there's a lot
00:16:59.840 of concern and I do think there's an authoritarian impulse. I'm going to show a bit of an interview,
00:17:05.200 a part of an interview that really kind of highlights this. It really brought it home. So this
00:17:10.160 is from CNN and Jake Tapper is the host. He had the health expert, his name is Sanjay, Dr. Sanjay,
00:17:19.920 and they were talking about how San Francisco is on a 24-hour lockdown. They have had a major outbreak
00:17:27.040 and so because of that they're really taking this seriously, basically ordering everyone to stay home
00:17:31.680 and the only people that can leave are people that work in essential services like health, people who are
00:17:37.120 delivery drivers and people that are going out to get medical attention or groceries. The mayor
00:17:42.320 of San Francisco did say, you know, of course you can go out and get fresh air. You can walk your dog,
00:17:46.800 you can go for a jog, that kind of thing, because really telling people to stay home, you know, it's
00:17:50.720 one thing if you live in a rural area or if you live in a house, you live in the suburbs like me,
00:17:54.640 you know, there's space, you can go in your backyard. If you live in the city though, if you live in a
00:17:58.960 little apartment, you have a dog, you can't tell someone to just stay inside. So people have to be able to go
00:18:05.280 outside. So Jake Tapper and this medical expert were on CNN and they were watching a clip of San
00:18:14.880 Francisco, the Abarcadero, which is the main sort of strip along the water, and it's 5 30 p.m. so
00:18:21.920 right when everyone's finished work, it shows a clip of people walking, people jogging, people holding
00:18:27.520 your hand, and Jake Tapper is just so furious. He's so mad that these people are actually out outside,
00:18:33.600 like how dare they be outside. So let's watch this clip and then I'll give some feedback about it.
00:18:38.640 What needs to happen in this country is we need to break the cycle of transmission
00:18:43.760 of this virus. And it doesn't look like that that's happening right now. And I'm worried these numbers
00:18:48.240 keep going up and they're going to go up because of the testing, but I think they're going to go up as
00:18:51.840 well because that virus, this virus continues to spread. And look, I mean, the mayor said to me that
00:18:58.240 people are allowed if they need to go out and get a, you know, go for a walk and get a breath of fresh air,
00:19:02.080 they're allowed to as long as they social distance. But that's not what we just saw.
00:19:05.760 We saw people going for jogs, people going about their life as if it's normal.
00:19:10.240 We're being told by the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institutes of Health
00:19:14.720 that this is not normal. First of all, we see a whole bunch of people here who are not
00:19:18.640 distancing. They're holding hands and walking down the street. And you know, normally I'd say bravo,
00:19:24.080 but this is, this is actually kind of enraging. The people of San Francisco, or I shouldn't say
00:19:31.360 the people, but many people in San Francisco have clearly not gotten the message.
00:19:35.920 So there you have it. Jake Tapper is enraged. He is enraged at the fact that people in San
00:19:42.880 Francisco, look at what you can see maybe 10 people. You can see 10 people. He's enraged by
00:19:49.280 that. And he's enraged by the fact that they're holding hands. People are holding hands. Okay.
00:19:54.320 Let me just say a couple of things. First of all, I used to actually used to live close to this area.
00:19:59.760 I used to live in San Francisco. I spent two years living there. I lived a few blocks from where this
00:20:03.760 is taken. At 530 on a weekday, this, this is usually packed. Like I used to ride my bicycle along
00:20:11.040 here. I used to go jogging every day on this path. And you would usually have a hard time even moving.
00:20:15.600 There are parts where you actually had to go onto the road to jog because you couldn't get through.
00:20:19.040 It was so packed with people. So what I'm seeing here is a huge, huge, huge reduction in the number
00:20:23.920 of people. Second of all, these people are social distancing. You know, you can go for a walk. There's
00:20:28.560 not that many places to really go for a nice walk in San Francisco. It's a pretty disgusting,
00:20:32.720 junky city filled with just, you know, lots of just garbage everywhere, needles everywhere,
00:20:39.840 feces everywhere, tent cities everywhere. One of the few nice places to go for a walk
00:20:44.480 is along the waterfront. And so that's where a lot of people go rather than walking through the
00:20:48.480 streets. So the fact that people are going out, you know, they're not really clustering close to each
00:20:53.120 other from best we know from, you know, the science so far is that you get this disease by sort of
00:20:58.320 prolonged presence in front of someone. If someone's sick and you spend like five, 10 minutes sitting
00:21:02.720 with them, that's how you're most likely to get sick. That's why, you know, airplanes, movie theaters,
00:21:07.600 restaurants are a big concern because, you know, you're sitting next to someone breathing in the
00:21:11.280 same air and you could potentially touch something they've touched. Walking by someone on the waterfront,
00:21:15.600 you know, interacting with them for maybe half a second as you walk by each other, that's not
00:21:21.200 when you're going to be at risk. And also the fact that he's getting angry that people are holding
00:21:26.240 hands. Well, newsflash to Jake Tapper and people who criticize others holding hands. People that hold hands
00:21:32.320 together are usually in some kind of a relationship together and usually probably even live together.
00:21:37.680 So the fact that, you know, if me and my husband want to go for a walk out on the street, us holding
00:21:42.240 hands, that's not how we're going to provide, you know, give each other the virus. It's more likely going
00:21:48.080 to be, you know, the fact that we share a bed together and that we eat all of our meals together
00:21:52.400 and that we live in the same household. So really the raging at people for not specifically following the
00:21:59.520 quarantine and how dare you go for a walk and get fresh air? You know, how dare you hold hands with
00:22:05.360 your spouse during a time of, you know, national crisis? I mean, I think that a lot of people have
00:22:11.920 like an inner dictator, an inner authoritarian, and when they get put in positions of power,
00:22:17.200 and we've all seen this, right? Like an overzealous border agent or, you know, security guard or
00:22:24.960 police officer or, you know, someone, a school teacher or something, they're given a little bit
00:22:30.160 of power and they kind of get on a power trip and they want to start, you know, abusing that power.
00:22:34.720 And I think that people in the media, you know, not to overly pick on Jake Capper, because I do think
00:22:39.360 he's a pretty fair journalist compared to a lot of other people over at CNN, but really, I think you're
00:22:45.760 going to go on TV and rage against people in San Francisco for getting some fresh air, going on
00:22:52.160 the seawall essentially, the barcadero, and going for a nice pleasant evening stroll and having
00:22:59.040 the audacity to hold hands. I mean, I'm sorry, that's fascism. That is fascism, no matter how you
00:23:06.800 paint it. And I think we've seen a lot of this, a lot of people getting really outraged at other
00:23:12.000 people not quarantining enough. I think everyone should, you know, do your best within your family,
00:23:18.160 within your community to avoid the spread. You know, if you're in any kind of position of power,
00:23:23.840 cancel meetings, cancel, you know, conferences. I was supposed to speak at a number of conferences
00:23:30.160 this fall. I think I've had five or six speaking gigs that have all fallen through because the
00:23:34.400 events have been canceled and I was completely for that. I was one of the people kind of leading
00:23:38.560 the front saying, you know, we should really cancel these conferences. We shouldn't do these events that
00:23:42.640 we planned. It's not a good idea for people to be traveling around the country. It's not a good idea to get
00:23:47.360 hundreds or even thousands of people in a room together before, you know, this thing really
00:23:52.160 exploded. I think we should all take opportunities that we can to encourage friends and family to
00:23:57.440 be cautious and, you know, stay home. If you know someone who is on self-quarantine because they were
00:24:03.520 on a trip, say, and they're back in Canada, you know, offer to go get them groceries if you're not
00:24:07.200 sick yourself. Offer to help them. You know, if you have someone in your family who can't leave the house,
00:24:13.280 someone in your neighborhood, you know, that's civil society. That's when people should step up.
00:24:18.800 But the idea that we should start imposing sanctions, like we should start arresting people
00:24:24.000 and fining people who don't adhere to that, I think that's kind of crossing a line and that's getting to
00:24:30.240 a position where I don't, that's not really a society I want to live in. And, you know, it's hard for
00:24:37.600 people to accept. Like, up until a week ago, we all lived in a free society where we could do whatever
00:24:42.480 we wanted. And now all of a sudden we have these like really increasingly strict and authoritarian
00:24:47.600 rules around us. Of course people are going to push back. Of course they are. And we we shouldn't
00:24:52.800 really blame them for that. All right. There was an article that I know I talked about it earlier in
00:24:58.080 the show about how I think we should call it the Chinese virus or at least the Wuhan virus because
00:25:03.840 first of all we shouldn't cower to political correctness. And people who right now are
00:25:07.840 talking, you know, putting out stories and complaining about how it's supposedly racist
00:25:12.960 to call this the Wuhan virus or the China virus, those journalists are doing the bidding work for
00:25:18.400 the communist government of China. There's no other way of putting it. That's exactly what's happening.
00:25:23.360 They are pushing out propaganda created by the Chinese communists. And it's shameful. It's
00:25:29.920 absolutely shameful. Anyone who's complaining or pushing that line of thinking should just
00:25:35.120 basically be called out and ignored. I will read from an article that I just thought was one of the
00:25:42.240 best articles that I have read about this. I love writing that's kind of punchy, kind of funny.
00:25:48.640 This is definitely an example of that. It comes from the National Review, which is an American
00:25:54.160 conservative magazine. It comes from a writer called David Harsanyi, who writes over at National Review.
00:26:02.560 I'll just read a little bit of it because I just think it's so well written and so
00:26:05.440 well put. So he says, the World Health Organization and other sensitive souls have instructed us to
00:26:11.280 stop referring to the new strain of coronavirus as the Wuhan virus or the Chinese flu because of
00:26:17.440 the racist connotations. I'm disinclined to curb my free speech to placate Chinese propagandists.
00:26:23.760 And it seems to me the aversion to those terms is less about racism than about averting blame.
00:26:30.720 But in the spirit of comedy and avoiding disparaging an entire nation, I'm happy to call it the Chai
00:26:37.040 Kong flu moving forward. So I like that quite a bit. He talks about how we always name things after
00:26:43.120 where it originates. So he comes up with a bunch of examples, the West Nile virus, Ebola, the Rocky
00:26:49.680 Mountain spotted fever, etc. He says that, you know, when you come to sort of really overly medical
00:26:57.200 terms like COVID-19 or H1N1, they don't exactly roll off the tip of the tongue. He talks about how we
00:27:03.840 still widely refer to the Spanish flu as a virus that killed around 675,000 Americans and tens of
00:27:12.320 millions around the world in the early 1900s. And it turns out that the Spanish flu didn't even
00:27:17.120 originate in Spain. It actually probably originated in China and spread through soldiers fighting in
00:27:23.200 the First World War. Yet we still commonly call it the Spanish flu. So why should we avoid calling this
00:27:29.760 the Chinese flu? And then he goes on and on about how he goes really in depth about how this disease
00:27:37.840 really originated and where it started from and how it is the responsibility of the Chinese regime.
00:27:44.560 So he says, the Chinese regime is perfectly capable of administering an array of authoritarian
00:27:50.160 policies to suppress the rights of its own people, but it's apparently unable to exert even mild
00:27:55.280 cultural pressure warning them that their eating habits can be extraordinarily dangerous and hold the
00:28:00.880 potential of creating massive socioeconomic problems. The reports are correct. It was in Wuhan's
00:28:06.560 popular wet markets that vendors were selling bats, possibly snakes, that may have caused the coronavirus
00:28:12.960 outbreak. Wet means that the meat sold in these unsanitary stalls was only recently slaughtered.
00:28:20.400 The kind of thing happens quite often, and not always in China of course, but the avian influenza
00:28:26.960 was transmitted to humans from chickens in a wet market. Scientists have been warning for years that
00:28:32.320 the eating of exotic animals in southern China is a time bomb. Acute respiratory syndrome known as SARS,
00:28:38.480 also originated in China, probably jumped to humans through bats. I hate to thrust my western cultural
00:28:45.120 values onto anyone, but maybe it's time we stop eating bats. Okay, this again is from a national review
00:28:52.320 article called COVID-19 is the Chinese government's curse upon the world. I'll continue reading.
00:28:57.360 It's important to stress that it's not the Chinese people who are the problem. Just look at their
00:29:02.640 success in places like Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, and the United States. It's the Chinese communists,
00:29:08.720 the chai comms that are the problem. If the Chinese government spent as much time working on educating
00:29:13.520 its people and regulating dangerous markets as it does in secrecy and propaganda efforts, maybe it
00:29:19.200 wouldn't have to worry as much about diseases being named after it, or about the catastrophic death and
00:29:24.400 economic pain. Their negligence helps cause. So I thought that was very good. I recommend reading
00:29:30.960 that article, even though I just kind of read it to you. But that's basically the gist of my view on
00:29:35.360 this. China is a very, very bad actor in the world. And because of this, we're basically, you know, shutting
00:29:40.400 down the entire global economy on a risk, on a bet, on a gamble to say, like, hopefully, if we all just stay
00:29:47.040 inside, we shut down all the businesses, we can make everyone work from home if they can. And if they can't,
00:29:52.000 then we just shut down their businesses. We let the stock market completely tank. Hopefully, we won't
00:29:58.240 all die from this disease. But we really don't even know if it will be effective. Some, you know, studies
00:30:04.080 are looking and saying that, you know, regardless, we're all still going to catch it. So whether we
00:30:08.320 catch it now, or whether we prolong it, and then as soon as all these self-quarantine measures let up,
00:30:14.000 people are going to go outside, and they're going to catch it just the same. So, you know, is it really worth
00:30:19.680 shutting down the entire global economy that may or may not ever recover? I mean,
00:30:24.240 we're in pretty scary times right now. I'm not sure that anyone really can predict what's going to
00:30:29.360 happen, which is why the stock market is really going haywire. And, you know, there's really a lot,
00:30:35.040 a lot to be concerned about. I don't think that, you know, Justin Trudeau's measures are necessarily
00:30:43.680 going to be of help, but at least they're going in the right direction, compensating people that can't go
00:30:48.240 to work because of government orders. I'm a libertarian. I said this on my other show that
00:30:53.360 I do with Andrew Lawton. I am a libertarian when it comes to government spending. I don't think
00:30:57.440 that government needs to take out loads and loads of debt. I don't really believe in having a big
00:31:02.240 social welfare state. I think that people are better off without all that stuff. But when it comes to the
00:31:07.360 government actually actively shutting down the economy, it's their fault that people can't go to work,
00:31:12.480 and therefore it's their responsibility to compensate people for that. But, you know,
00:31:17.040 it's not like Canada has a rainy day fund. No, we have to take out more and more debt,
00:31:20.560 which we're going to have to pay back eventually. And that's risking, that's based on a bet that
00:31:24.880 everything's going to recover and go back to normal in a couple of weeks or a couple of months.
00:31:28.640 I'm not really sure that it is. I'm pretty skeptical about that. Let me know what you think about that.
00:31:35.040 And I will be back again with another show, Candace Malcolm show next week. In the meantime,
00:31:40.000 my colleague Andrew Lawton and I have been doing a daily show, a daily, we call it True North update,
00:31:46.320 a daily update on everything, all the news with coronavirus, all the latest updates, mostly
00:31:52.080 looking at Canada, but also obviously it's a global pandemic, a global disease. So looking at the global
00:31:57.840 implications as well. Check that out. Our episode today will be up later on this afternoon. So thank
00:32:04.080 you so much for tuning in and don't forget to check out tnc.news. We have lots and lots of content.
00:32:08.480 I know everyone's kind of bundled up at home and people are probably getting bored, people,
00:32:13.120 uh, you know, stuck at home, not, not able to go out and do the things they normally do. So
00:32:17.920 we are trying to keep you entertained and keep you up to date with all the latest. So go check that out
00:32:23.920 at tnc.news. All right. Thank you so much for tuning in. I'm Candace Malcolm and this is The Candace Malcolm Show.
00:32:34.080 Leading Awareness Canada
00:32:50.720 We'll see you then.