Juno News - January 22, 2020The Candice Malcolm Show： Fake protesters everywhere
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
184.31265
Summary
Fake protesters are paid to support a Huawei executive, and more fake protesters are fighting against the pipeline. Meanwhile, real protesters in Virginia are maligned as white supremacists. Plus, we ll do fake news and talk about the conservative leadership race.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Fake protesters are paid to support a Huawei executive and more fake protesters are fighting
00:00:05.180
against the pipeline. Meanwhile, real protesters in Virginia are maligned as white supremacists.
00:00:10.620
Federal spending reaches an all-time high under Justin Trudeau. Plus, we'll do fake news and talk
00:00:15.120
about the conservative leadership race. I'm Candace Malcolm and this is The Candace Malcolm Show.
00:00:19.340
So Huawei executive Meng Wangzhu was in a Vancouver court this week. As you probably know,
00:00:30.160
she was fighting against extradition charges. She's been under house arrest in Vancouver since she was
00:00:35.320
arrested flying into Vancouver on her way to Mexico. She was held. She is being charged with crimes in
00:00:42.320
the United States for breaking U.S. sanctions. She is alleged to have been wheeling and dealing with
00:00:46.900
the terrorist state of Iran, which breaks U.S. sanctions. And so she is going to trial this week
00:00:52.960
while she showed up at a Vancouver courtroom and there was something fishy going on. There was
00:00:56.760
something fishy going on. There were a group of protesters outside the court, supposedly in support
00:01:02.300
of Ms. Meng. And basically, they just looked like a group of young students or perhaps out-of-work
00:01:08.620
actors. When journalists started pressing them, asking them questions, they basically folded.
00:01:13.580
There was incredibly awkward moments. Let's play a little clip of that.
00:01:17.380
What group are you with? I'm leaving, sorry. No, what's your name? You got a free Ms. Meng sign?
00:01:22.000
What school do you go to? I don't think you're allowed to ask us personal questions like that.
00:01:26.080
I'm a reporter. I ask personal questions. Are you paid to be here?
00:01:31.640
Yeah, so those don't really look like grassroots protesters. They couldn't really even explain what
00:01:36.140
was going on. They didn't know anything about the extradition treaty. Well, one of those
00:01:40.140
individuals has come forth to say that, yes, she was an actor. She was responding to an ad that she
00:01:45.840
saw and she basically thought that she was going to a set. She's an actor and she responded to an
00:01:51.000
ad. An actor who was part of a group of young people protesting outside of Huawei's CFO Meng
00:01:55.380
Wanzhou's extradition here on Monday said she thought she was performing as an extra in a film
00:02:00.240
shoot, not attending a real protester. So Julia Hack's staff says, this reporter started asking us
00:02:05.860
questions. I don't know how much time it was. It felt like forever. It was probably just 20 to 30
00:02:09.780
seconds. But then I realized, no, this is a real reporter. Amidst the media circus surrounding the
00:02:14.860
extradition trial of Huawei's CFO Meng Wanzhou, a group of young protesters stood out. On Monday,
00:02:19.940
reporters noticed a group of young people standing with hastily made signs that read,
00:02:23.660
bring Michael home, Trump stop bullying us, and free Ms. Meng, equal justice. The protesters couldn't
00:02:29.380
tell reporters their names or what group they represented. But some are now coming forward after
00:02:33.440
footage of the awkward encounter between real reporters and pretend protesters was spread
00:02:38.180
widely on social media. Wow. So there's news that they were being paid $100. Another report that they
00:02:44.440
were getting paid $150. Well, you know, that's that's kind of what you expect when you're dealing
00:02:49.480
with a communist regime like China and a state owned company like Huawei. And those weren't the only
00:02:56.320
protesters out in British Columbia this week. Bigger protests, the protest has expanded for people
00:03:02.560
against the coastal gas link pipeline out on Vancouver Island. This time they blocked a ferry
00:03:08.720
terminal, a very popular ferry route going from Vancouver out to Vancouver Island. They came up with a list of
00:03:15.520
demands for the British Columbia government, and they claimed to be representing and supporting a First Nations
00:03:23.200
group. Well, the only problem with this, and this is what we talked about last week with the United Nations report
00:03:29.440
that condemned this exact same project, is that First Nation groups were consulted in the approval
00:03:35.600
of this pipeline. And many First Nation groups actually support the building of this pipeline. As we've
00:03:41.120
mentioned earlier, 20 different First Nations groups have signed on to this pipeline. They are in support
00:03:47.440
of it. So it's a little bit rich when you see these sort of spoiled young kids having a temper tantrum,
00:03:53.680
blocking important infrastructure in the province, in the country, making demands, saying that you can't
00:03:59.600
build a pipeline. But then if you look at the demands, they go against the people who are affected
00:04:06.160
by this. So this is from a story earlier this week. A collective of First Nations who support the liquefied
00:04:13.120
natural gas industry in British Columbia say human rights advocates failed to do their research when
00:04:18.800
they called for the coastal gas pipeline project to be halted. Karen Ogden Taos, CEO of the First
00:04:26.240
Nations LNG Alliance, says in a letter to human rights commissioner that the pipeline was approved
00:04:31.520
through a democratic process that indigenous people participated in freely, and neither the committee
00:04:37.360
nor the commissioner consulted supportive indigenous groups before taking a position. So the process
00:04:45.200
by which this pipeline was approved was democratic. It included First Nation groups involved, and many
00:04:50.000
are supportive of it. So again, why are people protesting it? Why can't we just have a functioning
00:04:55.280
country where projects are built, where we take pride in our natural resource development that, by the way,
00:05:01.920
provides incredibly well-paying, good jobs, not just to First Nations people, but to all Canadians,
00:05:07.440
especially Canadians that have working class backgrounds or blue collar background. It is an amazing
00:05:12.560
opportunity for people to get well-paying jobs. And yet we have, you know, protesters who are just
00:05:18.640
absolutely demanding things that are having a very negative effect on the country. Again, sometimes it
00:05:24.720
seems like our country is just broken. We can't get anything done. And meanwhile, every other country that
00:05:30.720
has natural resources is going full steam and developing them. It's just Canada that can't seem to get past this
00:05:37.840
issue. So we have these two instances of protesters in British Columbia protesting pretty dubious things
00:05:44.400
that have kind of been shown to, you know, be protesting in, let's say, bad faith. Meanwhile, there
00:05:50.480
was a real protest on the other side of the continent over in Virginia. The democratic lawmakers
00:05:56.720
passed a very extreme gun control legislation in a state that's, you know, pretty much a Republican or red
00:06:04.640
state typically, where, you know, there's a lot of landowners and gun owners and sort of more
00:06:09.600
traditional people with traditional values. So after the Democrats passed these gun control laws,
00:06:14.320
thousands of gun rights activists from around the country rallied peacefully at the Virginia Capitol
00:06:20.000
on Monday. You know, this was a huge peaceful protest. There was no reports of any kind of violence or
00:06:26.800
anything untowards. It was just a large protest of, you know, patriotic Americans. They were chanting
00:06:33.920
USA, USA, USA, and standing up for their rights as Americans to, you know, carry guns. It's right
00:06:41.040
there in the Second Amendment. They have the right to bear arms, and they did, and they were protesting
00:06:46.480
very peacefully. But that doesn't change the way that the media covered the protests. And this, you know,
00:06:53.200
this is going to be my This Week in Fake News as well, because it really, really was unfortunate. The way
00:06:58.720
the media maligned these protesters. This is like one of the biggest criticisms that people have about
00:07:04.400
the mainstream media is that they are reporters by and large are made up of these coastal elites
00:07:09.520
who have never really interacted with people from the center of the country, either in Canada or the
00:07:14.000
U.S. They don't have any experience with rural people. They don't understand gun culture whatsoever.
00:07:20.320
So they see a bunch of people carrying guns and trying to protest. And all that the media see
00:07:26.000
are a group of, you know, deranged, far-right lunatics. And that's the way they cover it. That's
00:07:31.840
the way they cover it. So this is an exclusive over at TNC.News. CBC ran with a story that was also on CNN
00:07:39.360
and MSNBC, in which they basically accused people at this rally of being white supremacists and white
00:07:46.880
nationalists. There's a whole montage that someone created of those left-wing television networks in
00:07:53.920
the U.S., basically just maligning these people with no evidence and no good reason. Virginia on
00:08:00.640
the edge. How concerned are you that there might be some people in this crowd that may want to get
00:08:05.200
violent? There's certainly a lot of concern here. Raising fears of a dangerous confrontation. It could be
00:08:09.120
violence. And there is real concern there about what the intention is behind this. So the media see
00:08:13.920
Trump supporters, they see people waving Trump flags, and they just assume that it's going to
00:08:18.000
turn into some kind of a violent rally, again, with no evidence. And, you know, pointing to peaceful
00:08:23.120
protesters, calling them extremists, calling them white nationalists, and repeating over and over again
00:08:27.760
that you're worried about violence. There may be violence. Violence might happen. You know, this is
00:08:32.480
just, this is a problem with the media. And again, this is why people don't tune in in large numbers
00:08:39.120
anymore because it's just, you know, they, they take a story. They don't know how to cover it fairly.
00:08:44.560
They don't know how to cover it neutrally. And because of that, they end up just completely
00:08:49.200
disgracing themselves. All right, let's move on. The federal government is spending at an all-time
00:08:55.120
high. According to a new study from the Fraser Institute, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's liberal
00:08:59.280
government has recorded the highest ever per person spending by any Canadian government in Canadian
00:09:04.160
history, the study found, includes governments that were fighting world wars or that were facing
00:09:09.600
huge recessions. They've never spent as much as Justin Trudeau. The high level of spending could
00:09:14.800
lead to rapid deterioration of federal finances should the economy continue to slow or worse
00:09:20.400
enter into a recession, reported co-author Jake Fuss. The study tracked annual per person program
00:09:27.120
spending adjusted for inflation by Prime Minister since Confederation, found that spending in 2019 was
00:09:33.600
almost $10,000 per Canadian, which topped the previous record of $8,800 set by Conservative leader
00:09:41.360
Stephen Harper back in 2009. So three of the four highest spending years on record, 2017, 2018, and 2019,
00:09:50.000
are all under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his tenure. So by comparison, the height of the Second
00:09:55.520
World War in 1943 per person spending in 2019 reached $7,500 before dropping back down to $1,700. That's
00:10:05.760
how much the government used to spend before the rapid expansion of the welfare state and the entitlement
00:10:10.960
state, which is what we're living in. Scary times considering the economic outlook. A lot of people are
00:10:17.360
predicting a recession and, you know, the Canadian government has no plan for that. It's spending more
00:10:22.160
than ever. It's borrowing. It's piling up debt. And this is in relatively good, stable fiscal times.
00:10:28.720
What would they do if that turned? Uh, yeah. I mean, this is the problem with electing liberal
00:10:34.400
politicians who have no restraint and believe that they can just spend and spend and spend and,
00:10:39.280
you know, someone else can deal with the consequences of that. All right. And the conservative
00:10:43.920
leadership race is beginning to take shape. There really isn't a lot of people willing to throw their
00:10:48.960
hat in this time around. You know, you can compare this to last time. There was just a huge list.
00:10:53.040
There was like hundreds of people that wanted to succeed, uh, Stephen Harper and become the next
00:10:57.600
leader of the conservative party. They were hungry to fight against Justin Trudeau in an election.
00:11:01.680
And there was just really a lot of like interesting, competent people. You know,
00:11:05.120
you had different wings of the conservative party represented. Maxim Bernier was more on the
00:11:08.720
libertarian side and he was also feisty and willing to talk about issues that other conservative
00:11:13.440
politicians are afraid of. You had Kevin O'Leary coming in from the private sector,
00:11:17.920
talking about sort of the business, no nonsense approach. And then you had kind of, you know,
00:11:22.400
the, the range of sort of establishment conservatives, a lot of, uh, Harper, uh,
00:11:27.040
cabinet ministers jumping in, but still you had people interested in talking about ideas. Recall,
00:11:32.400
uh, Kelly Leach proposed the idea of a values test. Now she got completely demonized and destroyed by
00:11:37.680
the mainstream media, but at least we were talking about ideas and issues this time around. I mean,
00:11:43.760
the candidates, uh, again, it's just a group of people who have been involved in conservative
00:11:48.720
politics, basically their whole life. You have Peter McKay, Erin O'Toole and Pierre Polyev,
00:11:54.480
who appear to be the three front runners. Uh, these were all Harper era MPs for the conservatives,
00:11:59.760
all longtime players. And we're not really seeing anyone coming from the outside. I think we should
00:12:05.840
reflect on what happened in the last election. A lot of people are taking the lesson that, hey,
00:12:10.800
Andrew Scheer was too socially conservative and therefore what we need to have this time around
00:12:15.600
is a socially liberal or socially progressive, uh, candidate who just wants to talk about fiscal
00:12:21.360
issues. Uh, well, the problem with that is that there are already so many parties on the left that
00:12:27.520
that cater to that audience. If you are a sort of fiscally conservative or fiscally agnostic person
00:12:33.200
with progressive left-wing values, you can vote for the NDP, you can vote for the Green Party,
00:12:37.760
you can vote for the liberals. Uh, what about people who have conservative values? What about
00:12:41.760
people who have traditional values? Maybe they're religious, maybe they're just, uh, weary of the
00:12:46.240
rapidly changing norms that are happening and being pushed by the progressive left. I mean, defining
00:12:51.600
yourself as a social conservative isn't simply about the two issues that the media are obsessed with
00:12:56.240
talking about. They're always talking about support for same-sex marriage and support for, uh, unlimited
00:13:02.560
abortion. Uh, there's also a lot of other issues I think that would define whether or not you're a
00:13:07.680
social conservative. I mean, if you're a social progressive these days, you basically believe
00:13:12.880
that, uh, gender is a social construct, that biology, that biological sex is a social construct,
00:13:19.760
um, that words amount to violence, that Canada is this racist white supremacist country.
00:13:25.280
Um, you know, there's a whole slew of things that the left is constantly pushing.
00:13:29.920
Those are the extreme positions in my view, but they never get pushed under a microscope
00:13:33.760
in the same way as social conservatives seem to always be demonized by the media.
00:13:39.040
I think the important lesson, uh, from Scheer's time as leader is that, you know,
00:13:42.960
the conservative leadership job is not, it's not an easy job. If you look at the way that the media
00:13:46.880
just absolutely destroys you, you know, they dig into any aspect of your personal life to try to
00:13:52.160
embarrass you and they really push you on these issues. Andrew Scheer clearly wasn't prepared. He
00:13:56.480
didn't want to talk about his personal social views and he didn't have the ability to articulate them.
00:14:01.280
He didn't have the ability to push back against the mainstream media that was trying to force him
00:14:05.680
to take a position, take their position on the issue. I think that, you know, they've created a
00:14:11.680
situation, the media and also the conservative party have created a situation where it's just such
00:14:15.920
an undesirable job. You know, Justin Trudeau is the golden boy. The media are always going to
00:14:21.440
have his back and to, to, to sort of take the courage to, you know, define yourself as a conservative,
00:14:28.240
perhaps even be a social conservative and take that message to the Canadian public. You know,
00:14:33.520
there's so many barriers that you have to go up against, not only in the media, but in your own
00:14:38.480
party now. So many people are just saying, you know, don't take social conservative positions. And
00:14:43.440
we've seen that already with Pierre Polyev, who's already, uh, saying that he's not going to talk about
00:14:49.360
abortion. He's not going to legislate on that. Again, you know, where, where are social conservatives
00:14:55.440
supposed to go in this country? I think that, you know, there's been some interesting ideas put out,
00:15:00.160
uh, through thought leaders in the media. There was a really interesting article by Ken White
00:15:05.600
in the Globe and Mail, and he made the argument that the conservative leader should not be bilingual,
00:15:10.480
that, that conservatives should just pick a person who represents, you know, conservative values,
00:15:15.920
who's articulate, who's going to run a good campaign, who's confident, uh, who can provide
00:15:21.280
leadership, who has leadership qualities. And, you know, that one component of whether or not they
00:15:25.440
can speak French, well, that you can always sort of appoint a deputy in Quebec. You could always find
00:15:29.680
someone to speak for the party in Quebec, aside from the leader. And that would really open up the
00:15:35.360
pool instead of just having, you know, a small circle of basically career politicians who have forced
00:15:40.640
themselves to learn French, uh, or, you know, someone who's from an elite family in Montreal or
00:15:45.440
Ottawa. Those are really the only two groups of people in the country that are truly bilingual.
00:15:51.200
And, you know, that just really excludes so many potential good candidates. I think that's good
00:15:56.480
advice. I think that if you got rid of that one component of saying that you have to speak French,
00:16:00.960
a lot more people, you know, people from the business community, people from other, uh, you know,
00:16:05.600
areas that have different backgrounds and different expertise, they may be willing to throw their hat in and
00:16:09.760
create an actual interesting leadership race once again, where we talk about ideas, where we have,
00:16:14.320
you know, people who are willing to defend ideas instead of these like super polished, super vanilla
00:16:21.840
politicians, which is what we have right now. I would like to see that. I think that, uh, you know,
00:16:27.200
nothing against Peter McKay or Pierre Polyev, maybe they would be, uh, good leaders. We don't really
00:16:32.400
don't know much about what their policies are and what they stand for just yet. Uh, so we'll continue to
00:16:37.600
watch that and report on that. But I think that it would be good for the party and good for the
00:16:41.200
country if there was just more people in the leadership race and more, more ideas being put
00:16:45.600
forth to have an actual debate about ideas and really pick the leader that is, has the most
00:16:51.040
leadership qualities that can lead us into the election and have a shot at representing
00:16:55.680
conservatives and becoming prime minister. Okay. I'm going to leave it at that. Thank you so much for