Juno News - December 19, 2019


The Candice Malcolm Show: The CBC warns against visiting the United States of Trump


Episode Stats

Length

14 minutes

Words per Minute

178.75772

Word Count

2,616

Sentence Count

140

Misogynist Sentences

11

Hate Speech Sentences

13


Summary

The Canadian government has a secret program that allows dangerous individuals to enter the country, even if they pose a threat to our national security. Canada is secretly letting war criminals into our country, our revolving door prison system lets a woman out despite being convicted of a grisly, gruesome honor killing, and the CBC warns against visiting the United States of Trump. Plus, we ll do fake news and slow claps.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Canada is secretly letting war criminals into our country.
00:00:02.940 Our revolving door prison system lets a woman out despite being convicted of a grisly, gruesome honor killing.
00:00:09.140 And the CBC warns against visiting the United States of Trump.
00:00:13.200 Plus, it's Thursday, so we'll do fake news and slow claps.
00:00:16.340 I'm Candice Malcolm, and this is The Candice Malcolm Show.
00:00:23.500 Hi, everyone. Thank you so much for tuning in.
00:00:25.820 Things are going to change a little bit over the holiday.
00:00:27.480 We're going to go down to one podcast per week, and we don't have an Ask Me Anything this week.
00:00:31.940 We're going to do that next week in an extended version.
00:00:34.940 So if you're interested in getting a question into that, don't forget to sign up for one of our clubs
00:00:39.040 and then send a question over, and I will answer it on this podcast.
00:00:42.960 Now let's jump into the news.
00:00:44.780 So this was a story over at Global.
00:00:47.780 Global does a really good job of digging into these sort of immigration fraud, terrorism, and these kind of stories.
00:00:55.300 And we had one that came out this week.
00:00:58.380 Canada has a secret program that grants visas to war criminals, terrorists, and security threats.
00:01:04.680 This is a really remarkable story, very, very worrisome.
00:01:08.460 So the story is about an individual from Egypt who was a high-ranking member of Egypt's military
00:01:13.800 when orchestrated a coup back in 2013.
00:01:16.520 So because of his role in that, the Canadian government saw him as being inadmissible.
00:01:22.260 But when him and his wife applied to visit family members that lived in the Toronto area,
00:01:28.020 they were given visas.
00:01:29.540 Despite the fact that they were inadmissible based on Canada's rules around who can enter our country,
00:01:36.020 they were given permission.
00:01:37.500 And as we learned through this investigative piece over at Global,
00:01:42.160 the reason is because somebody from the Department of National Defense, DND,
00:01:48.280 wrote a letter to the Immigration Department saying that this individual and his wife
00:01:52.820 should be given visas to avoid upsetting Canada's relationship with Egypt's military.
00:01:59.400 This type of national interest letter apparently can be issued by any federal department
00:02:03.520 or the head of a Canadian mission abroad, according to an unpublished government operational bulletin
00:02:09.800 on this person's court case.
00:02:12.340 And so the reason that we found out about this is because that individual who was part of the
00:02:15.800 Egyptian military, when he was in Canada, him and his wife decided to make an asylum claim.
00:02:21.420 So like so many people around the world, they came to Canada under false pretenses,
00:02:25.660 pretending to be visitors.
00:02:27.140 And then once they were here, they decided that they didn't want to leave.
00:02:29.980 So they submitted an asylum claim.
00:02:31.820 And it was at that point that the government had to admit that,
00:02:35.120 hey, these people are actually completely inadmissible.
00:02:37.640 They shouldn't be in the country in the first place.
00:02:40.280 And they got rejected.
00:02:42.040 Well, the individual sort of rightly said, well, wait a minute.
00:02:45.600 How come I was able to visit Canada, but I'm not allowed to live in Canada?
00:02:49.280 Why is there this distinction?
00:02:51.300 And the Canadian government didn't really have a good explanation,
00:02:53.800 other than the fact that they just said that he was allowed to visit,
00:02:58.120 but he was not allowed to stay.
00:02:59.900 And so Global did a bit more digging.
00:03:03.120 And according to an annual report,
00:03:04.580 submitted to Parliament by the Immigration Department,
00:03:07.040 shows that there were 3,000 of these visas that were issued between 2010 and 2017.
00:03:13.860 So again, anyone in the government can write a letter on behalf of someone,
00:03:17.580 even if they're a war criminal, even if they're a terrorist,
00:03:19.900 even if they're someone who is a threat to Canada's national security,
00:03:23.240 saying, hey, you know, it would be in Canada's interest to not ban this person,
00:03:28.600 to let them come into Canada.
00:03:30.280 It's supposed to be for high-profile people, but it is also given to other individuals.
00:03:35.040 So talking about double standards,
00:03:37.040 this is just totally shining some light on how reckless our government can be
00:03:42.960 when it comes to who is and who isn't allowed in our country.
00:03:45.680 Canada actually has some pretty strong and strict rules
00:03:49.220 when it comes to preventing these kind of dangerous people from entering our country,
00:03:53.400 and yet there are all kinds of exceptions, exemptions,
00:03:57.040 and, you know, again, double standards that allow individuals to come in.
00:04:01.440 So good reporting over at Global.
00:04:04.240 The government needs to address this issue.
00:04:06.740 This is just one of so many different examples of how individuals are able to get into Canada,
00:04:12.640 how they're able to get past our immigration system,
00:04:15.900 and, again, people who ultimately pose a threat to our national security
00:04:20.360 are coming into the country all the time, and here is an example.
00:04:24.480 Moving on, this is just a really, really disturbing case.
00:04:27.300 This is over at the CBC.
00:04:29.520 Mother convicted in Shafia daughter's canal killings,
00:04:32.820 granted a five-hour escorted absence from prison.
00:04:36.440 The Shafia murder case was a very high-profile case that took place back in 2009, a decade ago.
00:04:43.640 Now in Kingston, Ontario, so this was an immigrant family that came from Afghanistan.
00:04:48.700 We learned so much about this family through the trial.
00:04:51.940 Basically, it was a polygamous family, so there was a husband and wife from Afghanistan.
00:04:55.880 The first wife apparently was unable to have children, so as is common in their culture,
00:05:02.240 the husband took on a second wife with permission of his first wife,
00:05:05.260 and the second wife was the one who had the children.
00:05:08.900 And then they all moved to Canada, and apparently their three daughters were becoming too Canadian.
00:05:14.320 They were becoming too Western, and the father didn't like that.
00:05:17.580 And so the second wife and one of the sons were all convicted in the murder of the first wife and the three daughters.
00:05:24.540 Just a really horrifying case, incredibly sad.
00:05:28.360 This is unfortunately common in some parts of the world.
00:05:30.660 They call them honor killings, because supposedly the women who get killed have hurt or harmed the honor of the family.
00:05:37.860 And so we learned that this mother, who was convicted of killing her own three daughters and her husband's first wife,
00:05:45.860 is allowed to leave prison.
00:05:48.440 So this is from the CBC story.
00:05:50.600 The Pearl Board of Canada granted this woman who was convicted of these murders
00:05:54.900 the ability to leave prison for a five-hour escorted leave.
00:05:59.800 Apparently she wants to visit the gravesite of her mother, who has passed away.
00:06:04.540 But again, the idea that someone could just be let out of prison so soon after these horrific, horrific cases.
00:06:11.340 And I just want to make one other point.
00:06:12.680 If you recall, during the 2015 election campaign, the Conservatives kind of made a botched policy announcement.
00:06:19.460 They wanted to introduce a hotline for barbaric cultural practices,
00:06:23.340 and they kind of rightly got skewered in the media over it,
00:06:26.560 and people thought it was horrible, and that it was dog whistle politics,
00:06:29.400 and it was racist and xenophobic, and all that kind of stuff.
00:06:31.580 I agree that the optics of the announcement were bad, and the name of the hotline was bad,
00:06:36.580 but the idea behind it was actually kind of noble, and I support this kind of thing.
00:06:40.880 The idea is that if someone is in danger, or someone who feels that their life might be at risk,
00:06:45.820 or that they're in an abusive situation, whether it be with their parents or a spouse,
00:06:50.200 they need some kind of an outlet.
00:06:51.760 They need someone that they can reach and discuss.
00:06:54.300 So in the Shafia case, the daughters knew that their parents, their father, was, you know, abusive and crazy,
00:07:01.440 and they feared for their life.
00:07:02.700 They went to the principal of their school.
00:07:04.320 They went to police.
00:07:05.340 They had multiple times reached out to the establishment for help,
00:07:10.800 and nobody was able to help them because they were so kind of concerned and confused about the cultural barriers
00:07:16.860 that these girls didn't actually have an outlet, and because of it, unfortunately, they, you know, were killed by their family.
00:07:23.680 If there was some kind of an outlet where they could reach someone who understood their community,
00:07:27.740 somebody who had been maybe in a similar situation and gotten out of it,
00:07:31.400 perhaps it could be saved, and maybe other girls who are in the situation in Canada could have that outlet.
00:07:36.580 So the idea that there could be some kind of an outreach center geared specifically towards people who come from different cultures,
00:07:42.440 who are trapped in a bad situation in their family, is a good idea.
00:07:47.180 Just because the Conservatives kind of made a mistake in announcing it and doing it in the middle of a campaign,
00:07:52.180 which was ill-advised, that doesn't mean that the idea is bad,
00:07:55.220 and this is the kind of thing that Canada has to deal with.
00:07:57.540 When we're letting in people from other civilizations, other societies,
00:08:00.840 people who have other ways of life that are totally at odds with our free society in Canada,
00:08:06.800 we have to be able to stand up against that, stand up against those horrific traditions
00:08:11.120 and say there's no room for this in Canada, not just to protect our civilization and our society,
00:08:16.760 but also to protect the rights and freedoms of those girls and those women who are in Canada
00:08:21.760 and who are trapped in those kind of situations.
00:08:24.860 Okay, this is going to be kind of a combined fake news story here.
00:08:28.700 I know it's an opinion piece, but there is an opinion piece over in the CBC titled,
00:08:34.940 Canadians traveling to or through the United States should pay close attention to their withering rights.
00:08:42.000 So here we have an opinion column from a PhD student over at Rutgers University,
00:08:48.520 and she's going on and on and on about how the United States is a racist and bigoted country.
00:08:54.800 She says,
00:08:56.040 In the political climate of President Donald Trump's Muslim ban and Facebook groups comprising bigoted custom agents,
00:09:03.560 Canadians traveling to or through the United States need to pay close attention to their withering rights.
00:09:08.540 While far less violent than the horrors at the southern border of the United States,
00:09:12.560 problems arising across the northern U.S. line are alarming.
00:09:15.760 Incidents of racial profiling against travelers of color have risen significantly.
00:09:20.580 And the number of people turned back by U.S. border guards has seen an increase in recent years.
00:09:25.380 Well, this is just a reminder that you don't have the right to travel to another country.
00:09:30.060 Countries have the right to protect their borders, defend their borders, and not let in people who they don't want to.
00:09:34.660 I think Canada should do a much better job of making sure that individuals who are inadmissible aren't actually allowed to come in.
00:09:40.900 People who don't have visas or who are crossing our border in between points of entry illegally, they should be stopped.
00:09:48.560 And this whole article, which is an opinion piece, but it's got, you know,
00:09:52.060 really a lot of sort of hyperbolic over-the-top language in it.
00:09:55.820 It kind of forgets the entire fact that just because you're a Canadian doesn't mean that you have the right to go to the United States.
00:10:01.620 You still have to follow their protocols.
00:10:03.240 You still have to be admissible.
00:10:05.500 You can't break the rules.
00:10:06.600 You can't just show up and demand your way in.
00:10:09.100 You have to be respectful and follow their rules and be able to get in.
00:10:12.380 So this is just a whole bunch of sort of scare tactics in the typical CBC manner,
00:10:18.320 trying to make it seem like the United States has suddenly become, you know, a despotic, tyrannical regime
00:10:25.220 just because they don't like the Republican president.
00:10:28.860 I think it's nonsense.
00:10:30.340 And again, it's just over-the-top sort of fear-mongering.
00:10:33.340 All right, let's do a couple of slow claps right now.
00:10:36.480 First of all, the first honor goes back to the CBC.
00:10:39.920 This individual is a reporter over at CBC Vancouver, and she is also a CBC reconcile this columnist,
00:10:49.820 whatever that means.
00:10:51.120 She writes, as a white Caucasian settler, how often do you make space for indigenous and
00:10:57.660 people of color in your organization to have a voice, to have a say in decisions, to play
00:11:03.000 key roles so that space is not entirely white Caucasian settler focused and centered and
00:11:09.820 not tokenism?
00:11:11.400 Okay, so if you can unwrap all of that sort of loaded language and basic race baiting here,
00:11:18.000 what this individual is basically saying is that if you're white, you need to step aside,
00:11:23.560 step down, shut up, and allow other people to have your space and have a role and to basically
00:11:30.900 be promoted.
00:11:31.720 This is racism.
00:11:34.260 There's no other way to describe this.
00:11:36.320 And again, loaded terms, really trying to divide people.
00:11:40.140 The state broadcaster should serve a function probably of trying to unite Canadians.
00:11:45.220 You know, that's what we have in common.
00:11:47.140 If we just separate ourselves into race groups and pit everyone against each other, it's not
00:11:51.760 going to be long before we're just unable to live together in a society.
00:11:54.800 And so instead of singling out people based on race and demanding that other people also
00:12:00.720 get singled out based on race, but they get promoted, it's just incredibly divisive.
00:12:04.920 It's very bad for our society.
00:12:07.100 And again, it's kind of almost a little ironic that she's sort of looking down her nose at
00:12:11.960 people that she calls settlers.
00:12:13.600 But then if you're a person of color, somehow you're not a settler.
00:12:17.640 So you're only a settler if you're white.
00:12:19.880 But presumably people of color have also come from other countries to Canada.
00:12:25.000 So how come they're not settlers too?
00:12:27.700 I don't really understand the logic there.
00:12:30.380 But, you know, it's just ideologically driven leftism, identity politics at its worst.
00:12:36.080 And that's what we've come to expect from the CBC.
00:12:38.860 Okay, one more slow clap just because this is so hilarious.
00:12:41.960 I mentioned this on my podcast last time, but I had to mention it again because it is
00:12:44.880 hilarious.
00:12:45.260 Greta Thunberg was traveling home and she took the train.
00:12:50.160 And because she's a spoiled brat and incredibly entitled and has absolutely no gratitude,
00:12:55.400 she tweeted this out, traveling on an overcrowded train through Germany.
00:12:59.560 And I'm finally on my way home.
00:13:01.180 She's got tons of luggage.
00:13:02.340 She looks kind of comfortable there, but she's sitting on the floor.
00:13:05.140 And she's kind of making it seem like she's hard done by.
00:13:07.780 Well, the train that she was traveling on, the Deutsche Bahn AG, the German train, tweeted
00:13:13.140 back, it would have been nicer if you had also reported how friendly and competent you were
00:13:17.880 looked after by her team at your seat in first class.
00:13:21.820 Okay, so Greta had a nice cushy seat in first class.
00:13:25.060 She had train officials looking over her and making sure she was okay.
00:13:29.420 And Greta instead decided to complain and talk about how the trains were overcrowded.
00:13:34.540 Well, if Greta had her way, we would all be on overcrowded trains.
00:13:38.080 There'd be no private cars and no airplanes, so the trains would be a lot more crowded.
00:13:42.700 This is a sneak peek into the minds of the fringe far-left environmentalists.
00:13:48.020 They complain about everything, and Greta has absolutely no gratitude for those who came
00:13:52.700 before her.
00:13:53.840 All right, I'm going to leave it at that.
00:13:55.340 Thank you so much for tuning in.
00:13:56.840 Again, if you want to get a question in the Ask Me Anything for next week, don't forget
00:14:00.140 to sign up for one of our clubs over at TNC.news.
00:14:03.880 Thank you.
00:14:08.080 Thank you.