Juno News - October 30, 2023


The case against a ceasefire in Gaza

Topics
Mentioned
Military bans prayer on Remembrance Day (ft. Tom Marazzo) Public support for mass immigration plummets

Episode Stats


Length

14 minutes

Words per minute

180.28

Word count

2,573

Sentence count

178

Harmful content

Toxicity

1

sentences flagged

Hate speech

20

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Andrew Yang is joined by Joe Roberts to discuss the growing number of calls for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, and the response from the left to those calls, and to the lack of support for such a move from some of our allies on the left.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Nevertheless, I want to pivot here ever so slightly to our discussion we had yesterday
00:00:14.380 on Israel. And I will say time and time again, I am a supporter of Israel and of the Jewish
00:00:20.200 people, and I have been heartbroken to see all of the displays that have masqueraded as
00:00:26.600 normal political protest. People storming into a Jewish-owned restaurant in Toronto, people who
00:00:33.260 are protesting outside literally a Jewish daycare in Toronto, not to mention the vile and very often 1.00
00:00:40.540 anti-Semitic rhetoric we hear from these people. But oftentimes things are not explicitly anti-Semitic
00:00:46.900 or anti-Israel. They are cloaked in language that may sound entirely normal. One of these is a word
00:00:52.720 that sounds on the surface to be wonderful, which is a ceasefire. People, I think, understandably
00:00:58.140 associate a ceasefire with peace, two belligerents in a war that agree for a time or perhaps permanently
00:01:04.360 to lay down arms and perhaps work out some agreement in the meantime to end conflict. This is something
00:01:10.960 that, again, on the surface sounds lovely, but in the context here is completely devoid of sense and
00:01:17.820 understanding of history and I would say is devoid of justice. Hamas struck a terrible blow against
00:01:24.400 Israel more than two weeks ago. There are still more than 200 hostages who are being held captive
00:01:29.600 by Hamas. You've had 1,500 innocent lives lost to this conflict. Israel has a right to defend itself 0.84
00:01:38.520 and Israel, which has been living under the perpetual threat by Hamas for years, has understandably the
00:01:45.320 desire to obliterate Hamas, which is under any interpretation of international law its right. 0.99
00:01:51.940 Why then do we see so many people, including Liberal members of Parliament, New Democratic members of
00:01:56.780 Parliament, many people from the left, calling for a quote-unquote ceasefire? I want to welcome to the
00:02:03.980 show Joe Roberts, who is a progressive voice, a fantastic writer and podcaster. He is the chair of
00:02:10.520 JSpace Canada and joins me now. Joe, it's good to talk to you again. Thanks for coming on today.
00:02:16.800 Hey, thanks for having me, Andrew. Appreciate it.
00:02:18.800 Now, I'm not trying to wedge you on your colleagues on the left with whom you get along on, you know,
00:02:24.020 probably 90, 95% of issues, but I know it's been a very challenging time in the last couple of weeks.
00:02:31.000 And I was just wondering, first off, if you could just explain how that's been, because I know that
00:02:35.080 other people I've spoken to of your political persuasion have said they've, you know, learned that some of
00:02:39.800 their friends were not actually their friends. No, it's been sobering. I mean, I think, look,
00:02:44.740 we saw violence and brutality on October 7th. That's incomprehensible. You can't even put words
00:02:50.480 around it to make it make any sense. And the response from some of our allies on the left has
00:02:56.220 been shameful, I think is the best word for it. I mean, really, truly hurtful. People that we've made
00:03:02.880 allyship with on racial justice, on social justice, on economic justice, we've stood by,
00:03:09.980 we've been supportive of their efforts. When they were threatened, we just didn't see the same. Now,
00:03:16.140 I want to be really clear. It's not everybody. It's a fragment of the left, but it has been a
00:03:20.920 really problematic thing. I mean, and the, you know, the vitriol, the anger, the interlacing of
00:03:29.680 anti-Semitism is problematic. All around, it's been a real challenge.
00:03:34.040 When we look at that word ceasefire, it's to me a bit of, I mean, we hear oftentimes from people,
00:03:40.120 dog whistle as the term, that something can be, you know, offensive without intending to be. And I
00:03:45.780 fear that ceasefire calls are like that because when someone says we need a ceasefire, what they're
00:03:51.200 in fact saying is that Israel has no right to defend itself and no justification to defend itself.
00:03:57.040 And you had a great piece in the National Post about this. I was wondering if you could explain
00:04:01.020 how you've approached this and these calls for a ceasefire. Apparently he was not just staring
00:04:08.580 intently. His camera has frozen. We'll get Joe Roberts back on the program in a moment. Let me,
00:04:14.960 while we're doing that, play this clip. This was a call to Pierre Polyev that was put to him by a
00:04:20.180 CP24 reporter on Saturday about this.
00:04:24.160 Did you tell your MPs not to sign this or symbolically do you think it would have,
00:04:28.320 obviously you can't force a terrorist organization, an organization that's been declared a terrorist
00:04:32.400 organization for decades now in this country to abide by it. But symbolically, do you think it would
00:04:36.980 have made a difference?
00:04:38.760 What?
00:04:39.200 To sign this letter, at least to say the Americans have encouraged and they've had discussions with
00:04:45.440 Netanyahu to, you know, undertake the most peaceful approach possible in this situation, while also
00:04:51.520 saying Israel has the right to defend itself, which the prime minister here has said on several
00:04:55.480 occasions since this all unfolded, this horrific event two weeks ago.
00:04:59.720 So what is your question?
00:05:00.920 Symbolically, would it have, you know, maybe been a gesture to have conservative MPs join
00:05:07.460 liberals and new Democrats and Greens and saying, let's call for a ceasefire?
00:05:12.580 It would have been a gesture to Hamas to, it would encourage Hamas to become even more violent 0.87
00:05:18.840 and vicious. Obviously, we, our heart breaks for every lost Israeli and Palestinian innocent life. 0.86
00:05:27.680 The blame rests entirely with Hamas and their state sponsors in Tehran, the Iranian government,
00:05:34.640 which help orchestrate this attack. We have to defeat the terrorism in order to get to a peaceful
00:05:41.580 two states, two state solution that will allow Israelis to continue to have a Jewish state and 0.61
00:05:47.860 Palestinians to have an independent state of their own.
00:05:51.520 I shared that clip with you to set up some of the reaction to it. Now, admittedly, a lot of this may
00:05:57.480 be colored more by people that dislike Pierre Polyev than people who dislike Israel. But there was
00:06:02.240 this one tweet from a critic of Polyev's who says that when you reject this ceasefire premise,
00:06:10.000 it's because you're not understanding world peace. So this idea that a ceasefire and peace are
00:06:15.720 equivalent. And we have Joe Roberts back from JSpace Canada. Joe, I don't know how much of my previous
00:06:23.120 question to you, you heard, but basically is a call for a ceasefire, a dog whistle to use that term
00:06:28.920 from, from people that are basically saying Israel does not have the right to fight back when it's
00:06:32.820 attacked. Look, I think there's a misconception about what a ceasefire is in this case, right? And
00:06:38.320 what is the long-term goal? We've been in this situation in Gaza five times, six times since the
00:06:44.740 disengagement from Gaza back in 2005. What does that mean? That means we've had these conflicts
00:06:50.440 every year, every other year. There's a, you know, there's been this phrase used mowing the lawn.
00:06:55.560 It costs civilian lives. It costs Israeli lives. It costs lots of money and security. It's not,
00:07:01.800 it's not a good situation. It's not sustainable. The status quo is not working. And so I think
00:07:05.480 there's a realization across the board, both in Israel, the reality, they recognize that the
00:07:11.360 citizenry demands a response, that this doesn't work, that this 1400 deaths and this brutality is not
00:07:17.340 acceptable and they must act. And I think there's a realization that there is no path to peace
00:07:22.300 without a fundamental change to the status quo, right? And so that means Hamas must be removed. 0.67
00:07:29.760 It can no longer govern Gaza so that it can rebuild and do this again in a couple of years. So we'll be 0.99
00:07:35.700 right back in the same place that we are today. And in the, in the long run, we're going to have more
00:07:40.120 death and more violence. So the goal here is the ceasefire is a pause. It's saying we're going to push a
00:07:44.940 pause right now and come back to this violence over and over again, never break the cycle. And when I think
00:07:50.680 what we're advocating for is to say, actually, you know, this needs to be seen through. Hamas must be 0.90
00:07:55.140 removed. The Palestinian people are not the enemy here. Hamas is the enemy. Remove Hamas. And then we can 0.98
00:08:00.280 actually start a political solution to this conflict through a two-state solution, which is the only real way
00:08:05.860 we'll ever end this cycle of violence.
00:08:08.160 Yeah, I think that's an important point. And I often believe that, well, not often, I think it's a pretty
00:08:13.180 clear-cut fact at this point that people who are very critical of Israel view Israel as being the
00:08:18.580 impediment to a two-state solution when, in fact, oftentimes it's the Palestinian activists who want
00:08:24.020 a one-state solution, which is an entire Palestinian state.
00:08:28.840 Well, I mean, look, let's be clear about what a one-state solution means. It means the erasure of a
00:08:33.320 Jewish state. It means the erasure of the Palestinian national aspiration, which they've worked very hard to
00:08:39.960 legitimize over the last 75 years. They don't want it, frankly. No one that would live under a
00:08:45.500 one-state solution would want that, right? 71% of Palestinians reject a one-state solution. 81%
00:08:51.800 of Israelis reject a one-state solution. There's no path forward here without two states. You know,
00:08:56.820 there was a call yesterday between the Palestinian Authority ambassador to the European Union and some
00:09:01.820 members of the EU, and someone said, well, what about confederation, which is another word for a
00:09:07.360 one-state reality? And he said, look, we reject this. I've never seen someone so angry, right? He
00:09:12.880 said, we reject this. Why would you tell us that we don't deserve our own state? So the reality is it
00:09:18.420 has to be a solution. Hamas is the impediment to that two states, right? That is, you cannot deal 0.98
00:09:23.260 with a terrorist organization. Everyone knows this. You have to get rid of Hamas, and we'll move 0.90
00:09:28.160 towards two states. It's the only long-term solution here. The one thing I also find jarring about a lot of
00:09:34.160 these calls for ceasefire is that they're not accompanied by a call to release hostages.
00:09:39.160 Sometimes they are, but oftentimes they're not. They're just unqualified. Israel must stop its 0.98
00:09:44.320 attack. Israel must stop its counter-offensive. Again, I understand the impotence, right? I mentioned 0.66
00:09:50.700 this in the piece. They're suffering. Human lives are being lost. There's no question about that. It's a
00:09:56.560 horrible tragedy, no matter who they are. On either side, Israeli, Palestinian, it doesn't matter. 1.00
00:10:00.860 And we have an obligation to make sure that this war is waged in a humane way. That means
00:10:05.640 humanitarian aid continuously going into Gaza. That means we would advocate for the restoring
00:10:11.840 of electricity and water to Gaza. We would advocate for fuel to be brought in for the hospitals,
00:10:18.920 recognizing there are challenges with humanitarian aid, but still, I think it is a moral and humane
00:10:23.760 thing to do. I think what the challenge here is when people don't see the humanity of both sides
00:10:30.480 of this conflict, which it is easy to do when you are stuck in an echo chamber in the West where you
00:10:37.600 have no stakes in this, the people that are real lives on the ground don't matter to you.
00:10:43.020 It's easy to say, I'm picking a team. This isn't a team sport. These are human beings. And the reality
00:10:48.980 of this place is there are 7 million Israelis. There are 5 million Palestinians. Nobody's going 1.00
00:10:53.640 anywhere. We have to share this place. We have to share this land. And we have to learn how to do
00:10:57.960 that together. Let me just ask you then, Joe, about a little bit of the way forward here insofar as you
00:11:05.600 and I are able to put our heads together and solve this conflict in the next couple of minutes. But
00:11:10.000 where is the way forward? Because right now, the Palestinian Authority is certainly a much 1.00
00:11:17.740 better force than Hamas, but there is a legitimacy problem there that's often raised. And oftentimes,
00:11:24.600 I think it's raised by people who are more sympathetic to Hamas. But again, Abbas has stayed
00:11:29.740 there for far longer than he was elected. But the counterpoint to that is that if elections were held,
00:11:35.180 it's very possible that Hamas would end up becoming more powerful. So how do you go forward
00:11:40.840 when even the Palestinian cause, such as it is, isn't unified under one main voice and one main
00:11:46.840 advocate? Yeah, I mean, look, this is a problem. And let's be clear, you know, there has been
00:11:52.240 no movement on peace building for the last 15 years. We've had, frankly, we've had extremists on both
00:11:58.280 sides, extremist leadership in Israel. We've had extremist leadership in the West Bank of the
00:12:04.200 Palestinian Authority who've said, status quo is good for me. If it works for me, it works for 0.92
00:12:08.620 everybody. Well, we've seen that that doesn't work. It actually breaks down and causes horrible
00:12:11.820 violence. So, you know, there's a lot of consternation about the Palestinian Authority.
00:12:16.460 And I agree. They have a legitimacy problem among their own people. Abbas is 88 years old. He's a
00:12:21.540 chain smoker. You know, he's not doing great. I don't think he's going to be the leader to move
00:12:26.340 Palestinian people forward. And whenever reunification of Gaza comes, which it has to come,
00:12:30.760 you can't have a two-state solution with a separate government in the West Bank from Gaza.
00:12:37.040 It will have to be under a Palestinian Authority. Now, what does that mean? I mean, 0.60
00:12:39.920 the Palestinian Authority has been undermined, defunded, challenged, I think limited in its
00:12:46.580 abilities somewhat by the Israelis to make sure that they wouldn't become a threat. But I think we 1.00
00:12:52.160 also look at the good things that the Palestinian Authority does. The Palestinian Authority has been
00:12:55.140 committed to the two-state solution along 1967 borders since 1987 when it was founded.
00:13:00.760 The Palestinian Authority has rejected violence, right? You don't see violence being done in the
00:13:06.440 name of the Palestinian Authority. You don't see a third intifada that's called by Abbas.
00:13:12.120 They recognize a path forward as two states. They also recognize Hamas is a dangerous and violent
00:13:17.140 extremist group that cannot be allowed to take root in the West Bank like they did in Gaza. And when
00:13:21.720 they, let's remember, when Hamas took power in Gaza, they threw people off roofs. They executed 700
00:13:27.220 Palestinians to take power. All of them were affiliated with the Palestinian Authority and
00:13:31.180 Fatah, the faction that controls the Palestinian Authority that Abbas is a part of. So I think
00:13:36.480 there's a lot of alignment here. What we're going to have to do, and it's going to take U.S. leadership,
00:13:42.240 Canadian partnership, and our allies are going to have to come together and have a plan. How do we
00:13:47.440 actually strengthen the Palestinian Authority? How do we train them? How do we arm them so that they can 1.00
00:13:52.400 defend themselves and also govern Gaza? It's not going to happen today. Even when Israel leaves,
00:13:59.140 there's going to have to be some kind of transitional authority. But I think that the
00:14:02.480 long-term solution, without the Palestinian Authority being in Gaza and a reunification,
00:14:06.500 there's just no pathway to peace. Thanks for listening to The Andrew Lawton Show.
00:14:10.340 Support the program by donating to True North at www.tnc.news.