Juno News - April 26, 2022


The double standard when it comes to protesting in Canada


Episode Stats


Length

3 minutes

Words per minute

144.00699

Word count

495

Sentence count

15

Harmful content

Misogyny

1

sentences flagged

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, I sit down with former Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper to talk about his response to anti-pipeline protests in the late 2000s and early 2010s, and how he handled the situation in the face of Indigenous and environmental protest.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 I want to ask you again though about Canada's institutions. Do you think we're in a good shape
00:00:05.520 as a country? What do you think of the charter at 40? What do you think of the broader constitutional
00:00:10.400 structure? How can we make these institutions more robust? What needs to be done?
00:00:16.160 Boy, that's a very big question. We're in bad shape. We have a breakdown in the rule of law.
00:00:23.200 It was just striking and disgusting to see how the difference in 24 months between the
00:00:32.880 Aboriginal and environmentalist protesters in February and March of 2020, so right around the
00:00:39.680 time that COVID was starting to become an issue, we had people blockading railway lines,
00:00:46.160 making it impossible for ships in Halifax and Vancouver to unload, and the cause they were
00:00:51.520 fighting for was it was anti-pipeline in the name of traditional Aboriginal territory,
00:00:57.920 even though the elected chiefs in those areas were pro-pipeline and were looking forward to
00:01:04.400 the job creation and getting their 80% unemployment rates, which you see on some reserves, getting that
00:01:10.400 down and getting people working. But in the name of Aboriginal rights, in the name of the environment, 0.85
00:01:14.720 in the name of anti-pipelines, we had these protesters that blockaded railway lines in Canada
00:01:21.840 and the Prime Minister's response was to negotiate and to say, we have to be patient,
00:01:26.960 even though that was definitely criminal conduct, to blockade a railway line, to blockade a highway
00:01:33.840 and prevent any traffic, not just slowing down traffic, but an outright prohibition on train travel.
00:01:41.680 So then fast forward to 2021, we've got vandals in Manitoba at the legislature tearing down and
00:01:50.560 vandalizing a statue of Queen Victoria, which is criminal conduct, and police just stand by and watch.
00:01:57.200 And then we get the truckers in Ottawa, not a single trucker charged with any crime in the first three
00:02:07.440 weeks that they're there, which tells you just how not illegal their behaviour was when there wasn't a
00:02:13.520 single criminal charge. There's no charges laid, no arrests made. And then you get this crackdown where
00:02:20.800 the Prime Minister imposes martial law on the country, the Emergencies Act, and declares a national
00:02:28.320 emergency. And next thing you know, we've got police horses trampling women, you've got unarmed 1.00
00:02:34.960 protesters getting beaten by police clubs, and you get this aggressive physical repression of a peaceful
00:02:42.000 protest. So the double standard is glaring. Where we're at in Canada is that if you're demonstrating
00:02:49.440 for a cause that the Prime Minister is sympathetic to, even if you're blatantly breaking the law,
00:02:56.480 you're not going to get in trouble. Conversely, if you're protesting for a cause that the Prime Minister
00:03:01.920 disagrees with, like our charter rights and freedoms that have been taken away from us the past two
00:03:07.040 years, well then we're going to have a ruthless physical suppression of peaceful protest. That
00:03:15.440 double standard is a violation of the rule of law, and it's very, very scary.