ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- June 04, 2021
The End of Women's Sports
Episode Stats
Length
35 minutes
Words per Minute
169.53969
Word Count
6,065
Sentence Count
6
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
00:00:00.000
welcome to canada's most irreverent talk show this is the andrew lawton show brought to you by true
00:00:09.800
north coming up are we witnessing the end of women's sport i talked to two authors who say
00:00:17.780
that's exactly what's happening the andrew lawton show starts right now
00:00:25.160
welcome to the andrew lawton show here on true north i am very much breaking with tradition i
00:00:33.020
think after i mentioned hockey briefly earlier in the week i said i'm never going to be talking
00:00:38.200
about sports again because i hadn't up till this point but i'm going to be talking about it again
00:00:41.860
today in quite a bit of depth but it's a topic that goes beyond sports because we have in this
00:00:48.780
a lot of other related factors not the least of which is free speech and also more fundamentally
00:00:53.960
a question of fairness and it looks specifically at one of the significant evolutions that's taken
00:00:59.340
place in competitive sports in the last several years you'll understand what that is when you
00:01:04.400
hear the title of the book unsporting how trans activism and science denial are destroying sport
00:01:10.960
it's written by linda blade with barbara kay published by our friends over at rebel news and
00:01:16.600
both linda and barbara join me here for this discussion thank you both so much for coming on
00:01:21.300
it's great to speak with you pleasure thank you now linda your background on this is quite
00:01:27.700
interesting i mean you have a strong knowledge of the fundamentals of sports from being an athlete
00:01:32.480
you've been the leadership of athletic organizations you've also yourself had a phd in kinesiology so
00:01:39.520
you understand some of the biological reality is at stake here but you've also seen so many people
00:01:45.820
that have spoken up about this issue just get absolutely decimated by activist backlash in
00:01:52.460
the media why did you want to not just comment on it but comment in such a significant way with this book
00:01:58.100
well the fact of the matter is that if uh somebody like myself if if somebody doesn't step up and start
00:02:06.360
saying something nobody will because it is such a raw topic that if an athlete says something or even
00:02:14.760
other coaches say something and especially if they're early in their career they could be utterly canceled
00:02:21.720
and ruined and you know i really don't have uh that much left to lose i've had my turn as an athlete
00:02:30.040
i am a coach i am president of athletics alberta and the province of alberta track and field
00:02:36.220
um and to me it's almost an existential threat to our sport so why wouldn't i say something i mean i
00:02:45.240
if if i don't say something soon and it keeps going this way there's not going to really be a sport to
00:02:50.760
deal with anyway so i might as well say something barbara you've written a lot in the past few years
00:02:58.060
about trans politics and trans activists what's your connection to this why did you want to jump
00:03:03.300
on board with this project well i i'm interested in in trans activism in general and i was seeing
00:03:11.420
this uh idea grow and grow that uh that uh trans women and trans men but the problem really is with
00:03:21.760
trans women feel that uh their identity as a woman uh should should be the basis for legal rights to
00:03:30.960
enjoy the same resources and uh the same admission to private women's spaces as any other woman that's
00:03:39.680
that's their stance that's their political stance and i i watched this uh acceptance of this idea growing
00:03:47.440
uh with great alarm because i one doesn't have to be know anything about anything you just have some
00:03:55.040
common sense to know where this was headed in terms of uh shelters uh prisons and of course sport
00:04:03.040
uh my daughter uh was an elite athlete in triathlon her daughter is a very fine young hockey player
00:04:12.960
and the thought of either my daughter and her day of having and she she did she was you know did get
00:04:21.680
medals and the thought of her being sidelined by a male athlete who's inherently bigger and stronger
00:04:29.760
and faster and and everything else it just kind of blew my mind and i said to myself well i know where
00:04:35.280
this is going to end uh it's going to be with sport because sport is something that is enjoyed by people
00:04:41.040
all around the world uh millions and millions and millions of people and the one thing that sport
00:04:45.280
has in common for all cultures and all so it crosses all socioeconomic guidelines and all races and
00:04:51.680
everything else is that people want to see a fair fight they want to see a fair uh a level playing field
00:04:57.920
so i said that's that's where the rubber is going to hit the road so it was shocking to me when the
00:05:03.360
rubber didn't hit the road and uh the same argument was being used with sport and it was working
00:05:09.760
and i didn't see any pushback uh i just was i found that shocking uh that this was happening in plain
00:05:17.360
sight uh it's like it's like watching you know a train wreck about to happen and not pulling the
00:05:23.600
whistle i mean i just couldn't stand it when i saw linda's starting to speak out i i was so thrilled to
00:05:31.680
see somebody who was a real stakeholder in the sport world having the guts uh to say speak the obvious
00:05:40.240
um so it was such a pleasure to be able to team up with uh linda let her she's the expert she had to
00:05:47.280
write the book um i was very eager to be of any assistance i could in terms of you know brainstorming
00:05:53.440
how it should go and chapters and format and style and all all the stuff that goes with publishing a book
00:05:59.520
um but uh so i it's a big honor for me to have been part of this collaboration one of the most notable
00:06:07.520
elements of this has been the breakneck speed at which something has gone from being an idea that
00:06:13.440
no one had ever heard of to one that in a lot of places is being treated as this unquestionable
00:06:19.600
orthodoxy that you're not allowed to challenge and just to put that in context you linda talk about
00:06:24.240
this you came across this in 2018 you were president of athletics alberta you here get to get a hold of
00:06:30.720
this document from 2016 so in and of itself less than five years old that none of your colleagues
00:06:36.880
had heard about and this was basically telling you that you had to start looking at a male athlete who
00:06:42.480
says they're female in the same way you'd look at a female athlete you know andrew it was just utterly
00:06:50.400
stunning just like any of the listeners who have never heard this before to the idea that a man or
00:06:58.240
male person could come along and just say oh no i'm gonna call myself a woman today and just think like
00:07:05.200
that's okay just open the gate let them into the female races i mean the whole point in having
00:07:13.680
women's sports is to have a distinct category for the female body i mean female bodies are completely
00:07:20.320
different than male bodies you know whether a trans athlete will win or not and people say well they
00:07:27.200
don't win a lot well it doesn't matter they're not the same body it's it's a completely different design
00:07:33.520
you know and i often say it's like putting a formula one car into stock car race they're
00:07:38.000
completely different designs even without even without an obvious advantage it would still not
00:07:44.960
be correct because you have to compete like with like and i i mean there was just no justification
00:07:52.880
andrew for this to have happened and i really believe it's our canadian politicians letting us down
00:07:59.280
by passing passing a bill bill c16 that is now being interpreted by all of the sort of middle
00:08:07.280
managers and bureaucrats across the land as if somehow we have to you know wedge all these people into
00:08:13.760
areas where they really shouldn't be and and you know calling that hate if we don't accept uh you know
00:08:24.080
somebody crossing a certain line we're still allowed to recognize biological sex according to
00:08:30.080
the canadian charter of rights and freedoms and people seem to have forgotten this so you know i
00:08:36.160
think i think it's just the pendulum swinging way too far and then making everybody too afraid to talk
00:08:42.080
about it well is a lot of this coming in your view from people pretending there aren't biological
00:08:48.720
differences or accepting there are and simply not caring well those are two different things if you
00:08:55.840
accept that there's a biological difference but you just don't care then you don't care about women's
00:08:59.840
sports so but i just just to clarify where do you think the motivation is coming from from the people
00:09:05.280
advancing this are they denying there are differences or are they just saying that those differences are
00:09:10.320
secondary to you know the need to be inclusive and all of these other things both i mean there is a
00:09:15.840
sector of people who amongst my trans friends even who say you know people who i know who are trans
00:09:22.800
who say no no no i i am a male but i'm just identifying i need to psychologically identify as a
00:09:29.520
as a woman and then there are those who just say no no no no no such thing as biological sex it's all
00:09:35.360
socially derived it's all taught after birth um it's only you know somehow assigned and magically at
00:09:43.120
birth when you come out of your mother's womb uh the fact that there happens to be a penis there it
00:09:49.840
doesn't that doesn't mean anything apparently to these people i mean the fact is that there is a
00:09:55.280
distinction there has to be a distinction that's how we perpetuate our species i don't even know what
00:10:01.120
this is about i could could i just add one thing and that is that even there are people in the official
00:10:08.560
levels of sport uh organizations and uh the former head of sports sociology uh i had an exchange with
00:10:15.600
him uh at university of toronto and he did admit he said well yes there is males do have a slight
00:10:25.920
he will admit a lot of them will admit to say something like 10 but he'll say but that's no different
00:10:32.880
from other uh disadvantages uh or advantages like economic uh resources or having an unusual wing
00:10:42.400
like if you're if if a male has a uh that swimmer phelps so it wasn't mark phelps who had the unusual
00:10:48.400
wingspan that sort of thing he says it's no different from that but but it actually is different
00:10:53.440
and and just one other point i wanted to make about people who say but they don't always win or they
00:10:58.480
don't win very often uh it's very important that people i think in sport not concentrate so much on
00:11:04.960
who's on the podium but sport is a tremendous matrix teams and and trying out for teams and getting
00:11:12.560
scholarships and who's who's uh considered in the top 10 or the top 20. i mean if you're a tennis player
00:11:18.560
it's the top 100. so if you take a male who was not even uh who's a mediocre or a terrible athlete
00:11:27.440
who wouldn't even get accepted on any team anywhere in a male competition and then instantly is even
00:11:36.480
if he's the fourth string you know even if he's the last person chosen for the women's team that's
00:11:42.160
not the issue he ends up having the fun and the pleasure and the attention and he has displaced a girl
00:11:50.640
or a woman from that team or he might even get a scholarship or some other uh advantage and benefit
00:11:58.960
uh and really make enhance his life at a girl's expense that's not acceptable so it's not only
00:12:08.000
about the podium it's about the whole spectrum of sport uh and it's about the psychological effect
00:12:14.080
on girls who see their chances slipping away and say you know i don't even think i want to try out for
00:12:19.760
soccer uh next year because you know so and so is on the other team i don't want to get hit by a
00:12:26.640
soccer ball you know 80 miles an hour that like so it's not it's not appealing to me anymore uh so
00:12:33.520
there's there's such a range of unfairnesses beyond who's on the podium just wanted to make that point
00:12:41.440
i know i think that's well taken i but i think who's on the podium matters as well there was one story
00:12:46.880
in the book that stood out i'm chuckling because of the absurdity of it but there's actually something
00:12:52.400
quite ridiculous about this a male born ncaa competitor who was 390th ranked as a male and then
00:13:01.680
won a woman's championship race so went from 390 to number one and their coach attributed it to their
00:13:08.640
strong mental power and something like that if you were to tell the average person to go back to what i
00:13:15.760
said at the beginning they would say is ridiculous but if you speak out and say that in the wrong
00:13:22.320
context you will just have everything you've ever worked for taken out from under you and you'll be
00:13:28.640
subjected to the cancel culture and and i mean this this idea of just going from 390th as a male to
00:13:34.400
first as a women and that someone's going to say well that was your mental power and not accept any
00:13:39.520
other variable as contributing to that and what does it say about the other women
00:13:42.880
what what the coach is saying is well they probably didn't try very hard because look this guy had a
00:13:48.320
great or this woman had a great mental attitude and went from 30 390th to first uh what does that
00:13:55.600
say about all the women that that that came after him uh if you had the proper mental attitude maybe you
00:14:02.400
could have been first so but it wasn't mental attitude and everybody knows it wasn't mental attitude
00:14:07.200
when you've seen in the associations linda these policies be adopted gradually and more and more
00:14:13.840
of them over the last five years is your sense that the people that are adopting these are are true
00:14:18.960
believers or is it driven by in a lot of cases fear just this is where things are going we have no
00:14:24.720
choice but to get on board it's 100 fear i know they know it's not real i know they know it's not true
00:14:33.840
but you know how many people have kind of come up to to beside me or or sort of sent a little message
00:14:40.320
saying please make sure you don't speak for us everybody's worried that their funding is going to
00:14:46.080
be tied to somebody saying something uh that that somehow some fringe person is going to be outraged or
00:14:55.440
mentally harmed by something we say meanwhile they don't seem to know or care that this this whole
00:15:03.120
ideology and what bar was just talking about this gaslighting short making all the female athletes
00:15:10.080
feel like they're inferior is mentally harming every single female athlete do they not care about that
00:15:17.360
there was a story that just came up this week of a runner from connecticut who was actually in
00:15:22.320
the book as well one of several suing she was i i forget the exact event but she was at the very
00:15:27.840
top and then displaced by uh displaced by a male identified competitor who comes in and there are
00:15:35.280
becoming more and more of these stories because i think that one of the initial responses i had heard
00:15:41.440
a couple of years ago when people were raising these criticisms is that you know every single one of these
00:15:45.840
is an outlier it's oh well you know it's one runner in connecticut it's one crossfit competitor but you get
00:15:51.680
enough of those and you start to see a bigger trend here and and these are not in in your view you say
00:15:57.200
in the book an insignificant number overall or even if it is an insignificant number that still has the
00:16:03.440
potential to have a lot of an impact it's unacceptable andrew that even one woman one female athlete should
00:16:11.680
be displaced incorrectly by somebody coming in who does not meet the categorical standards i mean if a if a person
00:16:21.120
let's say they do get to the top of the podium like cc tell for the one you're talking about going from
00:16:26.240
390th to first one person on top of the podium means every single female in that competition was
00:16:34.480
bumped down one notch so it affected every single female and her placing and her status within that event
00:16:43.920
it's just unacceptable to me to me to me it's it's like saying oh you know what's the difference if one
00:16:50.880
or two percent of athletes are doping you know so maybe they won't maybe a few of them win but they
00:16:58.080
should be included i mean the cv include this this word inclusion is like um people sort of go into a
00:17:05.840
trance when they hear it right we cannot we we must make people feel included and and there's something
00:17:13.760
about this idea that if there's point zero two percent of the population needs to be included that
00:17:20.480
means that 99.8 percent of the population uh will have to accept uh a certain level of unfairness
00:17:29.760
in sport we're talking about in sport uh and and the fact that uh however many of that percentage of
00:17:37.600
the population decide to go into sport that that in the name of inclusion they have to run the risk of
00:17:45.440
exclusion there's something very wrong with with the calculation that is being made at official levels
00:17:53.520
uh that there is no such thing as uh uh two sets of rights that are mutually exclusive so uh they're
00:18:03.920
they're concentrating so hard on on one group's set of rights uh and they're not putting into the
00:18:10.960
calculation if we give unlimited rights to this group are we harming or are we are we diminishing
00:18:20.960
uh or or running up against the rights of another group that is protected in the con you know in the
00:18:25.840
charter nobody's saying that to themselves one thing that i i've heard and and again i'm paraphrasing
00:18:33.120
from a talking point i've heard repeated numerous times in this debate is that if you've been in
00:18:38.880
transition for a long enough period of time and you've taken whatever the the required hormones
00:18:44.160
are depending on which direction your transition has taken place that after a certain point any
00:18:49.440
biological difference becomes negligible now a part of that argument has never quite sat well with me
00:18:55.680
just on on sheer logical grounds because irrespective of of hormones and and treatments bodies are born in
00:19:01.760
a certain way and and those fundamental bone structures are not changing for example but where
00:19:06.960
is that coming from and what's your response to it linda that that that argument that after a certain
00:19:11.440
point of time in transition uh any difference that you might have as a biological male over female
00:19:17.280
kind of evaporates the culpability lies at the feet of the international olympic committee
00:19:25.920
the ioc for some reason was convinced in 2015 to just say self id you can uh a male body a male athlete
00:19:38.160
can simply declare their woman live as a woman for one year make sure their hormone levels are down for
00:19:45.120
one year and they're that's good enough then that levels the playing field and they know themselves that
00:19:50.480
can't possibly be true how do you reduce bone size because of a hormone level how do you reduce the
00:19:58.560
lung capacity because of a hormone level this is just absurd and the fact that the international
00:20:05.040
olympic committee committee the very ones that care so much about doping control and dopey in fact
00:20:10.720
russia is out of you know in the bad books because they were doping and yet you know if you don't
00:20:17.280
you dope maybe you improve by like a nine percent figure something like that if you are a male athlete
00:20:25.520
even after reduction of the testosterone even more than even two or three years as the studies have shown
00:20:32.640
you're still up to 30 or 40 percent stronger than the fellow female athletes it doesn't it just doesn't
00:20:41.120
compute how can you say a nine percent advantage through doping is bad but somehow a 30 or 40 percent
00:20:49.120
advantage because you're the opposite sex is somehow okay i mean this is just absurd i don't know whether
00:20:55.440
somebody you know why they lobbied they paid them off what happened because this just doesn't make sense
00:21:01.840
and the resistance of the ioc to the voices of women calling for them to suspend that policy
00:21:08.800
until they wait and study it more uh they just they're just deaf they will not respond to us
00:21:15.680
finally last fall they responded and said well we can't do anything until after tokyo anyway but
00:21:21.600
if i had if i had given them the tip on somebody doping they would have been right on that doesn't
00:21:26.800
matter tokyo or not so i i just don't know what's going on yeah and i think you raise a really important
00:21:34.400
point there the olympics are to so many people the well the olympics of sporting event it's the gold
00:21:39.920
standard and the olympics making that decision relatively earlier on before anyone was talking
00:21:45.520
about this really in in most circles them doing that really gave cover for every other organization
00:21:52.000
to do it because now anytime it comes up at some local school board it's well if the olympics says it's
00:21:57.200
okay then it must be okay and no one has thought critically of it since that point well every other
00:22:04.480
time in in olympic history when women wanted something let's talk about the marathon uh track
00:22:10.240
and field started in 1928 in the olympic games it took until 1984 to allow women to run the marathon
00:22:18.160
they had to study it they had to consider it they had to do all these things and somehow when the when
00:22:25.760
the trans activists got into the committees at the ioc it took one year and all of a sudden oh yeah
00:22:31.680
that's fine we'll just we'll just open the door we'll smooth the path for you uh we'll study it later
00:22:36.720
i mean we'll just assume that a hormone level levels the playing field i mean they did not study
00:22:42.000
that this is the most dramatic thing you could do in olympic sports putting male bodies into female sports
00:22:48.320
and they have not subjected it to any studies and every single study there's been 13 studies
00:22:55.120
officially done on pre and post transition measuring their you know biomotor abilities
00:23:01.680
like strength and everything else and um not one study has shown that reducing the hormone levels
00:23:10.160
in a in a male body and a male athlete levels the playing field whatsoever so they have scientific
00:23:18.320
evidence that disproves their policy so they need to to suspend it and that's all we're calling for
00:23:26.080
as women please suspend the policy ioc you must suspend this policy you have to study it before you impose
00:23:33.280
this on every single female athlete in the world you did an audit of rio performance in a few events
00:23:42.320
i think you looked at the track and field events the running events and i want to pull up these numbers here
00:23:46.960
and there's a chart in the book that that summarizes this quite well that men who placed from first to
00:23:53.840
eighth in events still had an advantage over women who placed first so so even the first place uh female
00:24:02.960
stacked up against a lower ranked male that male is going to win and that's not because they're uh they're
00:24:09.840
a harder worker than the woman necessarily it's just because when you strip away all the effort the mental
00:24:14.640
acuity all of the preparation you're still left with a biological difference there yeah there's
00:24:20.720
nothing you're going to do because there are six thousand variables in the human body that are
00:24:25.440
distinct and different between men and women whether you're talking about inside the cell itself the
00:24:30.800
little tiny nano machines inside the cell or whether it's blood volume or the heart the the cardio
00:24:38.560
cardiovascular output uh muscle mass the way the fibers interact the angles of the bone like there
00:24:47.440
are just so many variables you're never going to be able to take every single one of those variables
00:24:53.360
and fix them in a male body so that somehow it aligns with female plus every single one of the however
00:25:00.400
many billions of cells would each have to be changed to from xy chromosome to xx chromosome it is
00:25:06.720
virtually literally impossible to change a male body into a female body we know this this is just biology
00:25:14.720
i mean why would you everybody knows this so we know that whatever the policy reason uh was it has to be
00:25:23.040
sociological and political one thing that that i find to be troubling about this debate is that it does
00:25:32.400
leave people who for whatever reason have a particular identity in a bit of a limbo situation
00:25:38.560
because someone who is male born identifies as female your position would exclude them from female
00:25:44.080
sports they probably have no interest in being in male sports and and wouldn't feel that that situates
00:25:49.680
i mean are we heading to a point where we need a third category because ultimately that's the only way
00:25:55.600
forward that i can see that that is somewhat of a middle ground not that anyone would accept such a thing
00:26:00.160
well if you're going to have a third category you actually have to have a four uh two more like
00:26:06.160
you have to have yes you're right because you need both both directions of transition
00:26:09.920
yeah so what i would say and the and the solution that we've come to in the book is that female
00:26:16.240
category needs to be restricted to female athletes and everybody who's anything else goes into an open
00:26:22.000
category that includes males um they can participate but if you want to have anything extra than female
00:26:29.200
you have to go into the open category and i think that allows for for for full inclusion and fairness
00:26:37.520
when you see some of the the competitors here some of them have a very activist bent to them and and
00:26:43.840
you can hear that and some i think there was one in in a crossfit tournament a couple of years ago
00:26:48.480
that almost seemed to be deliberately trying to to provoke to you know set themselves up for a lawsuit and
00:26:54.160
all that stuff but but when push comes to shove here you've talked about the fact that you believe
00:26:58.880
transgender people are deserving of dignity you very much reject this transphobia label that you
00:27:04.160
know is is attached to people uh that put forward a lot of these arguments that are rooted in fairness
00:27:10.480
i mean how do we find a way to keep people excluded or keep people from feeling excluded but also respect
00:27:17.920
this question of fairness we already have it andrew uh in my association as any other sports association
00:27:26.240
in canada we have no bullying policy um we will fully accept anybody identifying as they are socially
00:27:36.320
or you know other identities in your life or our politics religion we're not going to exclude somebody
00:27:41.440
on the basis of religion on the basis of your politics or on the basis of your identity in terms of
00:27:46.160
gender identity but we compete on the basis of biological sex so we will place somebody in
00:27:53.040
their appropriate sex biological physical sex category and then we will not bully them and that
00:27:59.520
is it's most fair and most inclusive that way and in fact how what better way to make a statement if
00:28:05.680
you are a male identifying as a female and you show up running looking like a female in a male race
00:28:12.240
that is the best way to demonstrate your uniqueness and your your your strength of character and your
00:28:19.040
willingness to participate in any kind of category just to participate in sport if you really care
00:28:25.440
about sport why would you care which category you go into if you can do it to be fair the assertion
00:28:32.080
is not that people are transitioning just to get championship titles is it i don't know that we don't
00:28:38.240
know people's intent and that's the whole problem we have different kinds of reasons for for people to
00:28:44.000
be trans i mean it's very clear that if a male who's 35 or 40 decides he wants to transition to female
00:28:50.800
and if a girl who's 13 wants to transition to man those ideologies the backgrounds to those decisions
00:28:58.000
the reason the psychological reasons for doing those things are completely different and so there
00:29:04.080
might be any number of 10 different reasons i've heard a lot of this thing like sometimes with ptsd
00:29:09.680
military men come back from the battlefield some of those are transitioning to to women so i i just
00:29:16.560
think that sometimes there's some other thing going on in your life and you just need to transition
00:29:20.800
and that's fine but that doesn't give you sort of carte blanche access to every single every single
00:29:27.360
space or whatever and if you care about sport if you really are just an athlete and then you just
00:29:31.760
happen to want to change your identity fine but then compete in the biological category where you
00:29:38.320
belong i i think there's if i could just say this idea that um everybody uh if has the right to be
00:29:50.400
accepted uh in every uh place or every organization or every institution uh even though their belief
00:30:01.440
system or their identity is is uh does not stack up with that uh institution uh to me it's very similar
00:30:10.800
to you know if you might want to be a member of the catholic church but you also uh want to have the
00:30:18.080
right to uh uh i don't know do things that that that the catholic church doesn't recognize as
00:30:26.320
so they refuse you communion or something like that uh you can you can be very angry at the
00:30:31.120
church you can say the church shouldn't be like that you can say that you know but if those are
00:30:35.680
the rules or another example that i gave in the book is look i have american relatives my mother was
00:30:41.520
american um i felt i loved uh my my my family in the united states i love the united states um and i i have
00:30:50.160
property in the united states uh but they're not going to give me citizenship for that and i you
00:30:55.360
know that doesn't mean i can vote in the united states so i can identify all i want as an american
00:31:01.520
because i i have such a great love for the country and i and and and i have my dna is is well not dna but
00:31:08.080
obviously my you know my heritage is partly american and all of that can mean a great deal to me to the
00:31:14.000
point that i identify as american but that doesn't mean i'm going to have the right to vote and and
00:31:21.120
there are limits to everybody's inclusion no matter what they identify as um or or what they wish they
00:31:30.240
were uh or want to be and i i think this idea that uh you know you want something very badly you want to
00:31:36.720
transition to another sex gender uh that's a huge thing you're doing so that maybe you have to give
00:31:44.640
up some dreams to have this bigger dream come true uh doesn't mean that you're entitled to uh take
00:31:51.600
part in every other dream of life that you have especially if some other dream uh you know impinges
00:31:59.840
on somebody else's dream so so why can't we just say i'm sorry that you're you're this this ultimate
00:32:08.080
idea that you have you're going to have both you know your gender dream and your sport dream come true
00:32:13.120
uh it can't happen sorry but it just can't happen i have two things to add to that please when we say
00:32:20.240
andrew even though you said maybe there should be a third category when we say something like that
00:32:24.240
we'd even be willing to give you your own category they they absolutely rejected the the
00:32:29.680
people who are the loudest absolutely rejected they want they need to be in the in the female
00:32:36.880
athlete category to have their gender identity affirmed so what does that mean if you tell me that
00:32:44.560
it means that you're using women's sport as social therapy and that is not what sport is there for
00:32:53.840
you can find other ways they're not interested because they absolutely need to be
00:32:59.600
seen in the women's category to affirm uh their identity socially so so it basically the conclusion
00:33:07.680
uh i don't think it's a stretch for me to say and to come to the conclusion in those cases with those
00:33:12.560
people who are insisting that it is a kind of a social kind of therapy and you know i had a second
00:33:20.240
thing to say about that sport is the last thing last place where you want to be if you have some sort
00:33:27.520
of need for like a therapy situation because sport is an area of life around where you hear the word no
00:33:35.040
all the time i heard the word no i didn't make the olympic team because i missed the standard by a little
00:33:39.200
bit no you didn't make team captain no you didn't make the cut no no no no you hear no all the time
00:33:45.840
everybody else in sport hears no why can't they accept no one thing that i i want to as we close address
00:33:53.120
here we had just this week a story in nova scotia where the halifax public library was taking a stand
00:33:59.680
after a bunch of activists mainly trans activists were saying that a book that deals with trans
00:34:05.360
issues abigail schreier's book should not be in the library you've come out uh full come out swinging
00:34:11.360
in this book unsporting are you expecting the same sort of attitude here that this book that raises
00:34:16.880
scientific arguments should not have a place in the discourse if they do try to cancel it they're
00:34:23.680
making my point because the whole point is that we're not allowed to talk about this and that the
00:34:31.520
discussion has to happen but somehow everybody's covering it up so if you if they act like that and
00:34:38.400
libraries and publishers and big big tech if they try to cover this up it literally makes my point
00:34:46.480
the book is called unsporting how trans activism and science denial are destroying sport by linda
00:34:52.960
blade with barbara k still available on amazon for now right yes well i think i have to have a second run
00:35:00.240
good we'll get it get it where you can it's the best advice i can give to people uh linda barbara
00:35:05.440
thank you so much for your time today and delving into this in as much depth as you have i really
00:35:09.360
appreciate it i got my coffee all right thank you very much andrew thank you barbara thank you both
00:35:17.920
barbara k and linda blade thank you so much once again and that does it for me for today this is
00:35:24.160
canada's most irreverent talk show the andrew lawton show here on true north we will talk to you next week
00:35:29.680
everyone thank you god bless and good day to you all thanks for listening to the andrew lawton show
00:35:34.560
support the program by donating to true north at www.tnc.news
Link copied!