Juno News - February 06, 2021


The legacy media doesn’t care about free speech


Episode Stats


Length

7 minutes

Words per minute

172.35422

Word count

1,330

Sentence count

65

Harmful content

Misogyny

1

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, Andrew Lawton talks about the proposed legislation from Heritage Minister Stephen Gilbeau that seeks to regulate online speech in Canada, and why no one else is standing up for free speech. He also discusses the MindGeek Pornhub situation and why it's important to protect our most vulnerable online.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
00:00:00.660 You're tuned in to The Andrew Lawton Show.
00:00:06.200 Welcome back to The Andrew Lawton Show.
00:00:08.820 I've been covering the last few shows, this forthcoming legislation that Heritage Minister
00:00:13.840 Stephen Gilbeau has promised to regulate online speech.
00:00:18.240 And the reason I'm talking about it again is because no one else is.
00:00:22.540 For example, Stephen Gilbeau mentioned, and this is what I said on Tuesday's show, that
00:00:27.340 the online hate definition will be based on a Supreme Court decision that actually took
00:00:32.560 a very non-inclusive view of, and I don't mean inclusive in the like Justin Trudeau diversity
00:00:38.620 is our strength sense, but I mean inclusive in the sense of what is legal and what is
00:00:43.000 acceptable, a very non-inclusive view of free speech by focusing more on harms and by saying
00:00:48.780 that, you know what, even speech that's true could conceivably be hateful.
00:00:52.580 And the reason this is so important is because that story got a little bit of coverage in
00:00:58.560 French media, La Presse.
00:01:00.180 No English media covered it, except for True North.
00:01:03.200 No English media picked up that story.
00:01:05.500 And similarly, when he's been in an ongoing basis talking about this, almost no one has
00:01:11.040 asked the questions through the lens of free speech.
00:01:13.540 What are you actually going to do?
00:01:15.660 What is this legislation actually going to be about?
00:01:17.700 When we talk about free speech and all of the aspects of society that are connected to
00:01:24.480 it, it's astonishing how few advocates there are for it.
00:01:29.740 And this is something that used to be a lot more unanimous than it is now.
00:01:35.340 For example, when the Canadian Human Rights Commission had its Section 13, which was the
00:01:40.020 online hate speech provision that was taken away, it was rescinded by the Conservatives, there
00:01:46.280 were a lot of people on the left and the right, your old school liberals, that said, you know
00:01:51.320 what, this is wrong.
00:01:53.020 People in the mainstream media, journalists that said, you know what, this is actually
00:01:56.340 pretty chilling to free speech and stood up and opposed it on principle.
00:02:00.180 When Ezra Levant and Mark Stein were fighting these commissions, they were actually getting
00:02:05.240 support from people who were their political opponents because everyone realized or enough
00:02:10.460 people realized, you know what, we can't have these institutions that have mandates
00:02:14.200 to censor.
00:02:15.620 Well, now what's happening, the liberals are bringing back Section 13 with a vengeance.
00:02:19.660 They're bringing back a much more powerful and supercharged version of it, which is still
00:02:24.440 aiming to enforce a definition of hate speech that is distinct from the definition that exists
00:02:30.140 in the criminal code and the definition that actually exists in Canadian laws.
00:02:33.940 They're creating a new definition which only serves to restrict and hinder free speech.
00:02:40.020 And who's standing up?
00:02:43.340 Who is standing up for it?
00:02:44.780 Where's Amnesty?
00:02:45.780 Where's Penn Canada?
00:02:46.880 Where's Canadian journalists for free expression?
00:02:49.480 In a lot of ways, I have to ask, where are the Conservatives?
00:02:52.640 I asked Conservative leader Aaron O'Toole at a press conference about this, and I want
00:02:57.020 you to take a listen to his answer.
00:02:58.980 Good morning, Mr. O'Toole.
00:03:00.280 The Heritage Minister has said that the government will imminently be introducing legislation to tackle
00:03:05.740 what it says is online hate, and Minister Gilboa has said that the definition will be based
00:03:11.600 on the Watcott Supreme Court decision, which was one that had focused more on harm than
00:03:16.820 free speech, and had actually at one point had said that something could be truthful but still
00:03:22.000 qualify as hate speech.
00:03:24.460 And I'm curious for you as the leader of a party that repealed Section 13 of the Human Rights
00:03:29.320 Act and someone who stood up for free speech in the leadership, what your thoughts are on
00:03:33.460 this forthcoming legislation.
00:03:35.740 I've stood up for free speech in this parliamentary session when the Prime Minister, Mr. Trudeau,
00:03:41.840 suggested it wasn't a priority when it's a fundamental pillar.
00:03:46.220 We saw President Macron call Prime Minister Legault or Premier Legault before he called Prime Minister
00:03:52.600 Trudeau.
00:03:53.960 This week, Andrew, we've actually been focused on the MindGeek Pornhub situation where we
00:03:59.440 have to protect our most vulnerable online.
00:04:02.060 Some of the testimony we've heard is literally heartbreaking, and the fact that a company that
00:04:08.980 was originated in Canada and had that presence, the fact that we're not shutting down these
00:04:17.960 ability for the vulnerable to be exploited online is a travesty.
00:04:22.440 So we'll see what the government brings forward, but we want to make sure that the most vulnerable
00:04:26.820 with online exploitation is an immediate priority.
00:04:30.600 You know, I think the MindGeek Pornhub issue is a very important one.
00:04:34.520 I think protecting the vulnerable from online harm is a very important issue.
00:04:38.080 I don't think it has anything to do with the question that I asked.
00:04:40.620 And apart from that very tacit endorsement of free speech in a general sense at the beginning,
00:04:46.440 there was nothing to do with free speech in his answer.
00:04:49.980 Now, I didn't ask that as a softball, but I am fully aware that asking a conservative
00:04:55.940 to stand up for free speech is probably one of the easiest things you can do.
00:05:00.440 That's like just a no-brainer for people on the right to say, well, yes, you know,
00:05:03.920 free speech is great and this is terrible and here's why.
00:05:06.400 And it was Brian Storseth, a conservative MP who led the charge to rescind Section 13.
00:05:13.740 It was conservative MPs on the Justice Committee even last year that were actually doing their
00:05:19.040 work, or it might have been 2019 rather, that were doing their work to push back against
00:05:23.600 some of the discussions in committee that led to this legislation indirectly.
00:05:29.280 But Erin O'Toole was asked a very clear question, could not give an answer that was standing
00:05:33.500 up against this with the exception of, well, we'll see what the government does.
00:05:37.060 Well, we already know.
00:05:38.320 We already know what the government is putting out here because they've told us.
00:05:44.340 Now, I would like to actually testify when this goes before committee.
00:05:48.120 I would like to testify before committee on this.
00:05:50.800 And I am going to tell you, if you have a conservative MP and you're riding, let them know,
00:05:55.280 especially if they're sitting on that committee.
00:05:56.720 I want to be there because we need free speech advocates right now to push back against this.
00:06:02.280 You know, there were enough cultural issues, cultural barriers to free speech right now
00:06:07.220 in society, from big tech, in all of these other ways.
00:06:10.640 We don't need a legal barrier on top of that.
00:06:14.280 We don't need yet another legal barrier, a tool to allow the government to get in bed with 1.00
00:06:19.240 big tech and censor people that, again, are guilty of something that is very ill-defined
00:06:24.260 or are believed to be.
00:06:27.140 Because that's the whole point of this.
00:06:28.540 This legislation that the government is looking at will penalize big tech if they do not censor.
00:06:35.240 But government is not doing the dirty work.
00:06:37.460 It's the tech companies that are.
00:06:39.300 And Minister Gilboa mentioned that, oh, well, you know, we should probably have an appeal
00:06:42.340 mechanism in place of some kind.
00:06:44.260 But I don't know if they're going to actually have that.
00:06:47.560 And the fact that he's acknowledged ramming this through because there might be an election,
00:06:51.720 so we have to work quickly, indicates that this won't be all that well thought out.
00:06:56.060 So I cannot stress how important this legislation is to watch, and I cannot stress my disappointment
00:07:03.000 that no one else is paying attention to it.
00:07:05.820 My message to you, and I know I've got members of parliament that listen to this show and read
00:07:09.960 my columns, and I'm very appreciative of it, but do not let this get by without a fight.
00:07:14.920 Thanks for listening to The Andrew Lawton Show.
00:07:17.340 Support the program by donating to True North at www.tnc.news.
00:07:26.060 Thank you.
00:07:30.940 Thank you.
00:07:33.000 Thank you.
00:07:37.480 Thank you.
00:07:38.680 Thank you.
00:07:41.740 Thank you.