ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Juno News
- February 02, 2023
The media got it wrong on Covid | Dr. Matt Strauss | Part 1.
Episode Stats
Length
31 minutes
Words per Minute
177.86159
Word Count
5,596
Sentence Count
19
Misogynist Sentences
1
Hate Speech Sentences
4
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
Hello everybody and welcome to the Rupa Subramanya show. I am of course Rupa Subramanya. I hope
00:00:23.440
you're all doing well wherever you're tuning in from. My guest today is Matt Strauss who's a
00:00:29.300
critical care physician and acting medical officer for Haldeman Norfolk. Dr. Strauss has been critical
00:00:35.240
of excessive government pandemic measures such as lockdowns and mask mandates and recently
00:00:45.280
sections of the mainstream media have tried to discredit and cancel him. Most recently an article
00:00:53.980
in the Toronto Star caricatured and ridiculed some of his comments. His health district however has
00:01:00.780
seen a 30 percent lower mortality from COVID than the provincial average so I guess in a sense he
00:01:06.920
feels vindicated and he's stepping down from his position. To talk about all of this and more
00:01:11.820
please welcome Dr. Strauss to the show. Matt welcome to my show. Welcome to the Rupa Subramanya show.
00:01:17.920
I really applaud your courage in being one of the few brave voices in the Ontario healthcare system.
00:01:26.240
You know you've had the courage to criticize some of these draconian and harsh measures from the
00:01:33.280
government. First you know can we can we start by you describing to us what you do as a critical care
00:01:41.840
physician. What what is it that you've seen during the pandemic as a critical care physician?
00:01:48.320
Okay so critical care doctors or ICU doctors it you go to med school for four years you do a background
00:01:55.200
specialty either internal medicine anesthesia surgery or emergency medicine for three to five
00:02:00.880
years and then you do two years of a subspecialty in critical care medicine and the some of the things
00:02:07.920
that define critical care medicine are very invasive medications that we give through the the the main
00:02:16.080
lines uh main lines that we put in your jugular vein and also the breathing machine so life support.
00:02:21.840
It might be fair to say that critical care doctors are life support specialists that's a huge part of
00:02:26.320
what we do and I have been practicing as a critical care doctor for 10 years. I was the chief of my critical
00:02:35.840
care unit in a community hospital in Ontario um I uh for the last five years I wouldn't say that I was burnt out
00:02:46.720
I was something like uh I felt like I I was limited in terms of growth and that some some things were
00:02:55.120
bothering me um about the sort of medicine I deliver um and what I was seeing in my patients that I was putting the
00:03:02.640
same person on a breathing machine three times in one year um for lung disease from smoking but they
00:03:08.080
were still smoking or um from overdose but they they were still being prescribed the medications that
00:03:13.360
they were overdosing on or um uh or diabetics not taking their insulin that sort of thing um so I was
00:03:21.760
concerned about these larger issues in population public health community health um and at the time I went to
00:03:28.160
I went to journalism school and uh I just finished a fellowship of a monk school in journalism when
00:03:34.000
and I'd written a couple pieces one for the national post and one for vice news um and and that's when
00:03:39.040
the pandemic broke out so I I kind of already had these background concerns about um sometimes we're not
00:03:45.360
doing what we wish we were or we're not achieving what we wish we were achieving uh in in our field um when the pandemic
00:03:53.520
sorry to quickly quickly interrupt why did you go to journalism school you were already a doctor
00:03:58.320
I wanted to write about these things that um oh okay these these counterintuitive things I was
00:04:02.880
seeing where yeah um it's really easy to pat yourself on the back all the time as a medical
00:04:07.280
specialist and being like I'm saving the world but it's like okay you're you're not there's there's
00:04:11.760
these bigger issues in public health that that um I think have to do the word holistic captures a lot
00:04:19.680
of it that health is so so much more than the absence of disease health is do you have someone
00:04:24.720
you can call when you're in uh bad straits do you have um do you have adequate housing these sorts of
00:04:30.160
things are like is your city walkable um and these are really public health concerns one might say now
00:04:35.840
anyway so I had just started writing and I had a couple clips in mainstream media the pandemic broke out
00:04:42.240
and uh I'd been on Twitter for like 10 years um and at one point I think in April 2020 I I
00:04:49.120
two are two things happened around the same time I on March 26th I I tried to get a piece published
00:04:56.560
about my concerns about lockdown that it was going to harm all these other things about health and
00:05:01.040
population health if if you're if your faith group isn't meeting if if grandparents can't see their
00:05:05.600
grandchildren if you if you don't have a good job like this is all going to cause more disease and
00:05:09.840
critical illness um and we're just being a bit short-sighted in terms of the two weeks to flatten
00:05:14.240
the curve canard um so I wrote this piece I I had read every paper on COVID like swear to God at that
00:05:21.520
time there weren't that many papers on COVID there's now 700,000 papers on COVID um so I felt like I I
00:05:26.800
understood the medicine really well I had this this honest concern about what we were doing to our
00:05:30.400
society and no media in Canada would publish that piece period full stop I sent it everywhere um people
00:05:38.880
editors who had printed my last pieces suddenly stopped returning my emails um and what when when
00:05:46.960
was this in the pandemic uh March 2020 so like oh two weeks after the first lockdown I think wow yeah
00:05:53.920
so it was like March 20th that I wrote this piece and I felt obsessed about it I was like I
00:05:57.920
I gotta get this out um and one Canadian editor of an international publication who I view as something as
00:06:04.480
a mentor uh accepted my piece for international publication and the next day said sorry my my
00:06:10.640
boss um like you know so we might say the publisher says absolutely not um but I'll have you on my
00:06:16.320
podcast but then he called back and said no I can't even have you on the podcast but he sent it to an
00:06:21.600
editor at the spectator uh in the UK which blew my mind as somebody who just started writing a couple
00:06:27.440
pieces to get into spectator it was amazing so I was writing for spectator I I couldn't believe my luck
00:06:33.600
um and I I had a couple tweets that went insanely viral um like 25 000 likes in a week one of which
00:06:40.480
where I just said hey my my ICU is actually empty it's never been this empty before uh we have 13 beds
00:06:46.640
we only have two people in our ICU seems like we flattened the curve like maybe we should start
00:06:50.640
liberalizing things that I think was a very banal statement but then suddenly Ben Shapiro was
00:06:55.280
retweeting it and I was like what is going on and with that attention or I guess you might
00:07:03.040
say journalistic success um came a lot of criticism of me um and I basically from day one in that spring
00:07:13.440
of 2020 I um I was criticized by colleagues I was criticized by administrators there were some back and
00:07:21.200
forth a bunch of meetings I had to go to some emails and at the end of the day I was like look I
00:07:27.280
I I'm the most kind of doctrinaire evidence-based doctor people were getting really excited about
00:07:33.440
ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and I was not excited about those things I'm really a dyed and
00:07:37.680
wool skeptic I want to see the international multi-center randomized control trial in a peer-reviewed paper
00:07:42.320
journal before I get very excited about things yeah um and then suddenly I was being painted as on the
00:07:47.760
fringe because I wasn't um applauding these very draconian measures so I for about six months I was
00:07:53.520
just engaged in the this criticism and concern about lockdowns um in November 2020 the university
00:08:01.200
administration the university I was affiliated with started giving me a very hard time and I made some
00:08:07.280
noise about hey hey look like if you go to the main webpage uh academic freedom is supposed to exist
00:08:13.600
here um like please stop sending me these things um yeah so that got turned up more and more as time
00:08:20.320
went on and then I became more and more alarmed because in December of 2020 we were suddenly um plunged
00:08:28.400
into another lockdown in Ontario which was yeah it was unbelievable to me I I could not believe it um
00:08:38.160
and uh it felt like I had done all this public commentary and critique had been in good faith
00:08:43.840
I'd been referencing the medical literature I um I described some some I was seeing firsthand things
00:08:50.880
that were also reflected in the medical literature so I was seeing more people dying of uh substance abuse
00:08:55.280
and uh overdose yeah we we now know I think it was published in JAMA in Ontario uh overdose deaths in young
00:09:03.760
men quadrupled during spring 2020 um which is horrendous and tragic and then and the first hand I was
00:09:12.480
seeing elders from nursing homes who were starving to death because their families weren't allowed to
00:09:16.800
come in and feed them which they had been depending on yeah um so I I always felt like I'm just honestly
00:09:23.360
describing what I'm seeing I'm honestly referencing the medical literature I honestly kind of am an expert
00:09:28.880
in this stuff um and I'm I'm not going to stop talking about it but it seems like it's having no effect
00:09:36.240
then in spring 2021 Ontario didn't even more draconian lockdown where they were going to have the
00:09:41.280
police stop you a block from your house to ask what are you doing out and it was the chiefs of police
00:09:46.000
in Ontario who said no we're we're not doing that this is police state stuff the premier to his credit
00:09:50.640
apologized I think the next day but if you look at any civics textbook anywhere in the western world the
00:09:55.600
chiefs of police are not supposed to be the guardians of civil liberty like if that's your um if that
00:10:02.080
that if that's who's protecting civil liberties in your country or your province that's a big problem
00:10:07.520
so I I frankly began to despair a bit I was like I I thought I had I thought I'd done everything I
00:10:14.720
could do in terms of public speaking and commentary and writing to just stop this tragedy unfolding um and
00:10:22.160
I I I was sort of out of moves and then quite out of the blue some members of this community in
00:10:29.040
rural Ontario on on the uh kind of cottage country uh farming community on the shores of Lake Erie
00:10:35.440
um asked me if I would apply to their job to the job to be their public health official so I took that
00:10:40.800
job yeah and when my appointment was announced like all hell broke loose the the Toronto Star the CBC
00:10:46.880
um ran hit pieces on me um that included just straight misinformation um I'm I'm not a litigious
00:10:55.200
person but I I did have to get a lawyer and that lawyer sent cease and desist letters to them and we
00:11:00.320
received a number of corrections and some apologies um and then I I just did my honest best to put the
00:11:08.400
medical literature and my clinical experience into practice um so for a year and a half now I've been the
00:11:13.600
medical officer of health for Haldeman Norfolk and I did not extend vaccine mandates like many of my
00:11:18.640
colleagues did I did not extend mass mandates um we did very little by way of school closures or
00:11:25.120
we didn't do restaurant capacity restrictions and accessible what the province uh was doing and
00:11:29.920
the proof is in the pudding we have uh 30 fewer covid deaths in my community that I serve than
00:11:35.920
provincially so at the end of the day I feel like I proved my point in in real life yeah I'm not expecting
00:11:42.560
any sort of victory parade but um hopefully the next time we have a pandemic we won't do these
00:11:49.120
wrong-headed things that are not supported by the best medical literature yeah no I was uh gonna come
00:11:53.840
to that actually uh because you um referring to your um recent op-ed in the national post where you say
00:12:00.560
that uh your district your health district saw 30 percent lower covid mortality than the provincial average
00:12:08.160
i i i i mean i do hope you feel a sense of vindication i think you do um but what what exactly did you
00:12:15.680
do there that was different from the rest of the province so i i want to be really clear i am not taking
00:12:23.760
credit for this 30 percent lower death rate um the mainstream media uh the toronto star the cbc uh uh
00:12:30.880
the globe and mail more insinuated it but and and some loud uh kind of twitter celebrities were saying
00:12:37.120
that i was going to kill people the the region was going to be on fire the hospitals would be
00:12:40.960
overwhelmed and i was i was sure that wasn't going to happen i think why is there 30 percent lower
00:12:47.200
mortality in the region has to do with what we talk about in public health as social determinants of
00:12:50.960
health i think people are more connected there there's more compassion there's um uh there there's
00:12:57.840
frankly more common sense um so but you know some of the things that i maybe can take credit for i i
00:13:07.040
was passionate about getting vulnerable people vaccinated and and not coercing um young healthy
00:13:14.320
people into getting vaccinated um and so i said hey i i want to build trust in public health if you
00:13:21.120
don't feel that you have a physician you can talk to about whether you should get vaccinated or not
00:13:24.640
call my office i'll call you back and i had dozens of phone calls with folks who were vulnerable and
00:13:28.880
and some of them after speaking with me did decide to go get vaccinated perhaps that affected mortality
00:13:34.400
rates um there was um when pax livid came out i i was very impressed by the trial data like i said i
00:13:41.120
was not impressed by hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin i thought this could be a game changer but it wasn't
00:13:45.680
available in my community so i i wrote a letter the board of health in my community um passed a motion
00:13:51.200
supporting the letter i gave the letter to the mpp the mpp hand delivered it to the minister of
00:13:56.560
health and they made packs of it available in our community um and that maybe saved some lives um
00:14:03.840
so there uh oh and another thing was there's a whole thing about monoclonal antibody uh
00:14:09.040
monoclonal antibody therapy right and we are very blessed um to be close to mcmaster in my community and
00:14:14.320
mcmaster had an antibody monoclonal clinic um and the director of that clinic was like i can't get anybody to
00:14:20.400
show up like nobody's referring patients it's almost i think because of trump arrangement
00:14:25.920
syndrome people were like no it's it's there's no treatment it's vaccinations and it's only
00:14:29.360
vaccinations we have to get everyone vaccinated it's like no there's many things we can do um
00:14:33.600
so i i developed a procedure by which we would identify high-risk people in the community and get
00:14:38.320
them referred to that clinic um uh right away so and you know i don't know but hopefully that saves
00:14:44.240
some lives too well yeah no that's uh that's very interesting i mean i i know i saw the attacks um
00:14:52.080
you know the attacks from sections of the mainstream media some journalists will come to that a little
00:14:57.680
later uh just a quick question you know you mentioned to me that uh people in your community
00:15:03.040
uh actually wanted you to um head head the public health unit in that district um what that you know i find
00:15:11.520
that very interesting because at a time when you were saying um something that was going against
00:15:17.440
sort of the mainstream narrative it was going against the grain of what was considered to be
00:15:24.160
uh you know the right thing to do at that time um how is it that people in your community thought
00:15:30.960
otherwise and how how is it that you were then you know you eventually got to this position how did that
00:15:36.480
come about um all i can say is a member of the community dm'd me on twitter had me call a number
00:15:44.880
of other community leaders who were interested in what i had to say i think that just demographically
00:15:50.720
there are a lot of farmers in that community okay um i think that a lot of what happened in terms of
00:15:56.160
the nonsense that we saw there was there was a few things one is if you live and work in the ivory
00:16:01.760
tower in downtown toronto and you create uh sophisticated computer mathematical models to
00:16:07.200
predict what's going to happen you can publish papers all day long you can go speak at conferences
00:16:11.840
all day long and it seems like nobody ever asks you if your models actually successfully predict reality
00:16:18.720
but you can have a sterling academic career based on these predictions that turn out to be false yeah
00:16:24.480
um and i think that in an agricultural community you as a farmer you can come up with a computer model
00:16:33.280
but how you're going to grow more rutabagas that are bigger and more delicious than anyone else
00:16:36.880
yeah you find out six months later if your theory holds water and if you don't grow the rutabagas that
00:16:41.760
you thought you're going to you might lose the farm um so i think i think throughout the world when
00:16:48.720
you you go to these sort of rural agricultural places you're you're going to find a lot more common sense
00:16:52.960
and a lot less um reliance on what uh what the the so-called experts of mainstream media media think
00:17:02.640
and you didn't face any kind of resistance from the bureaucracy i uh like like um um the bureaucracy
00:17:10.080
of these uh health care units at all like oh you know this is matt strauss he said all of these things
00:17:15.120
about lockdowns and masks and uh you know and i don't think he would be good for this position you just
00:17:21.840
don't feel that kind of uh resistance um when i was hired um uh the the board of health which is the
00:17:29.520
the body to which i report uh voted nine to zero to hire me um and and everything that i had done
00:17:36.560
was public yeah when the media started raising hell uh it you know it was largely the downtown
00:17:43.280
toronto based media yeah there was a bit of um public outcry i think that um i i heard one member
00:17:55.120
of the board of health say they got like the same email 50 times like a chain letter and and i think
00:17:59.360
some of them were spooked um so a meeting to reassess the hiring was called okay um i wrote them a letter
00:18:07.040
saying like look these these media reports are false the corrections have been printed here's what i
00:18:13.360
actually said what i actually believe and then over that period of time i understood they they got um
00:18:19.040
hundreds of like individuals in the community uh calling their office saying that we we uh the one
00:18:26.400
the one board member who i think was concerned about the blowback initially said we had hundreds of
00:18:34.080
phone calls saying we we don't want mandates we want dr strauss um so there was a bit of like
00:18:39.440
astroturfing online slacktivism to get rid of me yeah in the end they voted eight to one to keep
00:18:45.280
well i think that's a great story actually and it gives me some hope uh given that you know everybody
00:18:50.640
was saying the same thing and you were saying something different and and then you know you headed this
00:18:56.720
healthcare unit and uh and you know i think it's you know it gives me some hope and optimism that uh that
00:19:02.480
there are sensible people out there and uh and that uh that we are capable of empowering uh sensible
00:19:09.440
people among us and uh so that you know that's that's a great story actually um so um you know
00:19:16.080
matt i mean could you tell me uh you know we were we've been you know you've opposed these draconian
00:19:21.520
uh measures um you know how do you how would you assess the risk benefit trade-off between um you know
00:19:28.960
between harsh measures such as lockdowns i mean did in the end did you do you think lockdowns saved
00:19:34.000
lives did they did they make any difference at all so the the best medical papers i have about 13 of them
00:19:44.240
um there are the 13 that i'm talking about looked at actual differences in population-wide mortality so
00:19:55.120
and we can do this ad hoc we can say we'll look at california versus florida florida was more liberal
00:20:00.400
with age-adjusted mortality for covid they had about the same outcomes you can look at brazil
00:20:04.960
versus argentina brazil was criticized because bolsonaro uh took a more oddly liberal approach um
00:20:11.040
given his politics otherwise whereas argentina did very strict lockdowns and there's not much
00:20:16.960
difference there either you can look at sweden versus the uk or sweden versus belgium
00:20:20.640
um all of these things people like to compare sweden versus denmark but denmark also or sweden
00:20:25.440
versus norway but all the scandinavian countries actually had more liberal approaches in general um
00:20:32.000
so we can do that and we can be accused of cherry picking but when researchers will will take all of
00:20:38.880
the u.s states or all of the countries in europe or all the countries in the world and and then
00:20:43.360
do um uh multivariate logistic regression analysis yeah and for those 13 papers that i that i have
00:20:51.760
there's no difference based on how severe your um measures were in terms of the body count at the
00:21:00.320
end so i'm i'm very comfortable saying no on the on the large scale they didn't i think that there's
00:21:07.040
still the theoretic possibility that if you're if your hospitals are overwhelmed and you do lockdowns
00:21:12.800
for two weeks and you make it instead of a two weeks of being overwhelmed four weeks of being
00:21:18.800
just stressed there might be a mortality benefit there but ultimately like the lock lockdowns can
00:21:24.080
only work for as long as you do them so it always felt to me like we're building a bridge to nowhere
00:21:28.400
every every case that you prevent with this lockdown um you're just going to get when the lockdown is
00:21:35.760
relieved and that's what we saw in ontario like the the vast majority of ontarians ended up getting
00:21:41.280
covid despite all of the time we spent in lockdown so it's it's a it's a delaying tactic it doesn't
00:21:46.960
change the game yeah um yeah no i just want to come to uh this uh question that uh you know i i i
00:21:55.760
refer to this uh in my recent national post column actually um uh it's not about lockdowns it's about
00:22:02.800
vaccines and um and it was a wall street journal uh opinion column by a member of the editorial board
00:22:10.560
uh citing three different studies that point to how uh viruses are actually adapting to the vaccines
00:22:17.920
um um just as i suppose evolutionary biology would predict this um uh and that's my layman's
00:22:26.400
understanding of evolutionary biology i wonder what you think about this are vaccines actually uh
00:22:32.960
abetting the rise of new variants i think that um i think that there were always going to be new
00:22:43.120
variants no matter what we do if you have a if you have any organism and you're not eradicating it
00:22:48.800
you're it's not on the endangered species list um covid will be with us forever um covid will continue
00:22:56.080
to mutate forever um if you uh if you give a population of an organism a uh an evolutionary
00:23:05.840
push in one direction where you say well we're going to use this defense the vaccines the virus
00:23:09.920
will evolve around the vaccines so there always were going to be variants um what sorts of variants
00:23:15.600
we see may in fact be responsive to what mitigation measures we we use i think that and i just want
00:23:21.680
to be very clear i think that it's a bit of a modern miracle that a new disease came out and nine
00:23:27.440
months later we had a vaccination that saves lives that's incredible um and i i never want to take away
00:23:36.400
from that scientific achievement um it seemed to me but and and we're talking about evolutionary
00:23:43.520
evolutionary theoretical speculation okay i like to talk about what the numbers show afterwards but yeah you
00:23:50.960
i would conjecture and i and i did conjecture i didn't like to tweet or write about it but
00:23:54.720
probably the best time to get covid is is three weeks after your vaccination and if you get it five
00:23:59.520
years from now hey you'll be five years older um and your vaccination might have worn off but also
00:24:03.600
it'll be a variant that is not the same as what you were just vaccinated for so um that's how i view it
00:24:09.680
yeah i mean the last time i was vaccinated was more than a year ago and uh i probably um i i mean i i
00:24:16.560
i suspect i had covet at some point before the vaccines uh were uh you know were even available
00:24:24.320
i mean i i suppose i'm just basically more or less walking unprotected but i'm also assuming i have these
00:24:29.760
antibodies right from um from from having recovered from a covet infection um you know so do you do you
00:24:37.520
think that everybody should get vaccinated should we be on this constant sort of uh round of boosters
00:24:45.520
i mean some people have had seven or eight shots at this point which um which i'm thinking that even
00:24:50.640
with the flu shot you you wouldn't take that many flu shots over the course of two years right uh so
00:24:59.200
that's certainly correct um yeah the it's really really hard to make blanket statements about should
00:25:05.440
everyone in general in medicine if absolute absolutist statements are always wrong should everyone
00:25:12.640
always get vaccinated always all the time for with every vaccine um probably not should no one ever
00:25:19.120
get vaccinated with no vaccines definitely not um and i think my concern i understand why they
00:25:27.760
felt they could not deliver nuanced information to the public because it it's just hard to do um
00:25:34.960
but i think you have to try so i don't know where the cutoff is for who will benefit and who will
00:25:42.320
not frankly because it's a new vaccine um my personal priority would be if you are over 40 definitely
00:25:52.240
you should be vaccinated um if you have already if you're covered recovered um there is less uh benefit
00:26:00.560
to getting vaccinated if you are under 40 there is less uh benefit to getting vaccinated if you have
00:26:06.160
severe medical problems you should definitely get vaccinated if you don't there's less benefit and
00:26:12.880
the just common basic principles of medicine and ethics like um pharmaceutical ads in the state
00:26:22.000
say talk to your doctor i think if you're not sure you deserve to have a doctor that you can talk about
00:26:28.320
this with and some folks did call me and they would say i have heart disease in my family and i heard
00:26:33.280
that this vaccine causes heart issues so i don't think i should take it and i was like well what heart
00:26:37.680
disease is in your family well that's not what the the vaccine causes and what risk factors do you
00:26:41.520
have and um some of them elected to take it after that so what i was really uncomfortable with was on
00:26:47.120
the side of the road there were light up billboards on the 401 that said get the jab and i was like
00:26:52.000
no that's not that's not how individual like health is really complicated and every individual
00:26:57.120
has a rich context and even as a physician if i spend 20 minutes with you i'm not going to know your
00:27:00.240
whole life um but i hopefully will know enough to come to uh be able to give you a recommendation so
00:27:07.040
um there are there are folks who look we we have this um paper that came out in november uh 2021 where
00:27:15.760
they they looked at everyone who died suddenly uh 20 days within a vaccination and they did autopsies on
00:27:21.680
them and for they had 35 people in at the heidelberg medical center in baden-wittenberg germany um which is a
00:27:30.240
province of 11 million people so they only had 35 who died suddenly um and they they looked at their
00:27:37.040
hearts and they found that four of them had myocarditis that couldn't be explained by anything
00:27:41.840
other than the vaccine um so it's not that there's zero risk to this so maybe there's a four and 11
00:27:49.040
million chance of this happening with a vaccination that's not zero that's incredibly rare and i believe
00:27:54.240
that in general at a population level the vaccine saved way more lives than four out of 11 million
00:27:59.760
but you have to take people's concerns about that seriously because the number is not zero exactly
00:28:06.320
i mean it is exactly it is not zero and uh yeah i mean since you mentioned died suddenly and you
00:28:13.840
probably have um i don't know if you saw the movie uh and and all of the references to died suddenly
00:28:20.960
that have been making the rounds on social media lately um you know it it's you know i i i trained as
00:28:27.920
an economist so i look for data and hard evidence before i come to some kind of a conclusion when
00:28:34.560
it comes to a certain thing like what are other factors that could be contributing to a person
00:28:39.200
suddenly collapsing for example right how do you how do you discern all of the you know the the the
00:28:44.640
various um things at play here and and so the conclusion seems to be increasingly by by you know
00:28:52.720
uh by some people that it's the vaccines that are causing these um heart attacks and uh you know
00:29:00.480
you have these professional athletes were just uh collapsing uh maybe a few weeks after a booster
00:29:06.240
some people have died what exactly is going on here i mean is there is there some truth i mean and and
00:29:12.800
and here before you know before i finish that question i mean one of the things that i've learned
00:29:17.440
during the pandemic is that yesterday's conspiracy theory uh is today's reality and so i've um i'm
00:29:23.760
not quite sure what is going on here do the skeptics the vaccine skeptics have a point here
00:29:29.600
i think that you are wise to say that you don't know what's going on um the wisest man uh
00:29:36.480
are in let's say western philosophy socrates says i i only know that i don't know um and on both
00:29:44.240
sides of this issue so the first thing i'll say is i didn't watch that movie some people who i think
00:29:49.280
are very thoughtful and reflective who did watch it gave a description to me and i was like yeah that
00:29:54.880
that doesn't sound credible and it's not i'm gonna spend two hours on a friday night um the what i what
00:30:03.600
i have seen happening so like one thing you could take from that german pathology study with the autopsies
00:30:08.160
is only four out of the 35 people who dropped dead unexpectedly at home um died because of vaccine
00:30:16.160
induced myocarditis and that's not completely confirmed but it seems like the most likely
00:30:20.160
explanation so i think it's deeply irresponsible if you're on twitter and somebody faints somewhere
00:30:26.960
or has a heart attack somewhere to say this is the vaccine you they might not even have been
00:30:31.440
vaccinated so there's just a lot of deeply irresponsible claims coming out from anti like
00:30:38.880
the sort of the old traditional anti-vaccine movement um and then i think they're in the
00:30:44.720
medical establishment is a reflexive like they're conspiracy theorists they're uh misinformation
00:30:50.160
mongers uh they're very bad people we need to censor them and no the vaccine doesn't kill anybody
00:30:56.080
it's perfectly safe and it's like well no hang on absolutism on both sides i understand why
00:31:01.120
they're falling into a reflexive absolutism because the claims made on the anti-vaccine side are
00:31:05.840
irresponsible and often false but four out of 35 out of a population of 11 million is still not zero
00:31:13.360
so we have to be really careful to be nuanced at all times
Link copied!