The NDP is WRONG about free tuition
Episode Stats
Words per minute
173.43074
Harmful content
Misogyny
1
sentences flagged
Summary
Reality Check examines the leftist case for free tuition in Canada. In this episode, we will explore the three main arguments in favor of free tuition, the reasons why it's a good idea, and why it should be implemented.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
finally let's move on to the leftist third and final argument in favor of free tuition
00:00:04.640
which is that it increases equity in canada equity is different from equality equality says
00:00:09.280
we should treat everybody the same equity says that we have to recognize that people start in
00:00:13.920
different places and so we have to treat them differently to try and level the playing field
00:00:18.400
presumably when leftists apply this equity lens to the tuition debate they're saying that people
00:00:23.840
don't always start in the same place financially so we have to help lower income people make that
00:00:29.200
leap into post-secondary by covering the cost of their tuition but a universal free tuition policy
00:00:34.480
does the exact opposite of that in fact free tuition policy is often defined as a regressive one the
00:00:41.040
opposite of progressive it's regressive because it helps the rich people in canada a lot more than
00:00:46.160
it would help the actual poor as tristan hopper points out in a national post column according
00:00:51.040
to statistics canada nearly 80 percent of children from the richest fifth of canadian households go
00:00:56.320
to post-secondary education among children from the bottom fifth the rate is less than 50 percent
00:01:02.080
so by eliminating tuition fees the benefits would disproportionately accrue to the wealthy canadians
00:01:07.280
already sending their kids to university and this really seems to be a common theme on this show
00:01:12.400
reality check is questioning why leftists when they claim to want to help the most vulnerable in
00:01:18.080
society or the lowest income why they always insist on these grand universal programs that pay for
0.98
00:01:24.560
everything for everyone even the rich you don't need the help why not just focus your efforts on
00:01:29.120
those who actually need it now one of the weirder claims that i found from the left regarding this
00:01:34.240
issue of free tuition comes from the green party of canada on their website it states and i quote
00:01:39.360
students are one of the most disadvantaged groups in society end quote a canadian student is in an
00:01:44.640
incredible position of privilege and this statement by the left is contradictory in itself because
00:01:49.360
if they're saying that access to education is the path out of poverty and a path of self-betterment
00:01:54.240
and higher earning potential then it's unclear why they would suggest that a student is so
00:01:58.480
disadvantaged and if there is a genuine concern for equity here then it's really questionable why they
00:02:03.840
would suggest that people who haven't had the opportunity or perhaps the inclination to attend a
00:02:08.400
post-secondary institution why they should be saddled with the cost of sending someone else to as
00:02:14.240
norma kazaya from the montreal economic institute said by broadly subsidizing higher education more
00:02:20.000
heavily the average taxpayer is in effect financing the high salary earners of tomorrow it should be
00:02:26.160
asked if this is fair for people who do not benefit from university to contribute to its financing
00:02:31.280
to this extent but ultimately painting the cost of tuition as an equity issue fundamentally
00:02:36.720
misunderstands the reason why people choose not to attend post-secondary as university of ottawa
00:02:41.760
akarmist ross finney points out cultural factors are a more relevant predictor of one's decision
00:02:48.320
whether or not to attend post-secondary corroborating these findings kelly foley who's an economic
00:02:54.160
professor from the university of saskatchewan points out quote research suggests that before
00:02:59.760
students ever reach the barriers posed by the costs of applying for and enrolling in university
00:03:05.120
disadvantage and less skills investment in early childhood can represent a brick wall
00:03:10.560
thus the link between family income and university enrollment is largely though not entirely driven
00:03:15.840
by factors that wouldn't be ameliorated by making university free so in conclusion eliminating the
00:03:21.600
cost of tuition for canadians would not eliminate the underlying factors that influence why individuals
00:03:27.440
choose to or to not attend post-secondary in canada