In this episode, Andrew Lawton talks about the Lindsay Shepard case, and why it's so important that we protect the right to free speech on Canadian campuses. Lindsay Shepherd was a teaching assistant at the University of Toronto, when she recorded a video clip of Jordan Peterson's controversial views on gender pronouns being debated in a classroom discussion, and then decided to take matters into her own hands. Now, she's suing the university for $3.5 million.
00:00:00.000Hello everyone, good afternoon. Welcome to the True North Report. My name is
00:00:04.920Andrew Lawton broadcasting live across Facebook right now. I'm a fellow at the
00:00:09.560True North Initiative and we're here on January 7th to talk about a big story in
00:00:15.480Canada that has been going on for a little over a year and it has to do with
00:00:21.100one of the biggest issues that we face in 2019 and that is free speech and
00:00:25.880specifically free speech on college and university campuses. So I'm going to talk
00:00:30.880a fair bit over the next little while about not just the Lindsay Shepard case
00:00:36.380but really the themes of this case that make it much bigger than Lindsay Shepard
00:00:41.900but there are so many different dimensions to this. I have to give a bit of the
00:00:46.060backstory here and bear with me and I know a lot of people have been following
00:00:49.820this but it's such a profoundly not unique example but a profoundly well it's a good
00:00:58.580example quite frankly not because it's a positive case but a good example it
00:01:02.840really instilling in everyone what people should already know about these
00:01:08.720which is that campuses are not places for free speech and that's been one of the
00:01:14.440biggest challenges here. So if you're just tuning in I welcome you very much I'm a
00:01:18.560fellow at the true north initiative and one of our big issues and certainly one of
00:01:23.080my big issues is preserving and protecting constitutional liberties across
00:01:26.880Canada and that includes the right to free speech not just because free speech
00:01:31.680is a good thing but because free speech is an essential hallmark of a free
00:01:37.280society without speech without debate you lose your freedom and when you bring
00:01:42.680that less in the macro sense of a society and more into context of just a
00:01:47.940a campus or academia in general without free speech you have no free inquiry
00:01:54.360without free inquiry you have no education without education these
00:01:57.940universities cease to actually be anything other than institutions of
00:02:02.940indoctrination and this is where the Lindsay Shepherd case really is so
00:02:08.220exceptional so to go back to November of 2017 Lindsay Shepherd who at the time was I
00:02:14.460I think 20 21 22 years old something like that was doing what most students were
00:02:21.000she was going to school doing her thing she was not a right-wing fire breather by
00:02:26.520any stretch and she decided that she wanted to do something that shouldn't
00:02:30.540actually be an exceptional thing and that is have all sides of a discussion
00:02:35.880represented she was a teaching assistant she was in an undergraduate class for
00:02:40.980which she was the TA and she showed a clip from Television Ontario so that's the
00:02:45.780Ontario equivalent of CBC and the clip as you know was of a debate about gender
00:02:52.380pronouns the clip featured Jordan Peterson who had one particular
00:02:56.520perspective of this that is essentially that he doesn't believe in the
00:03:01.540fluidity of pronouns like some of the SJW leftists do and which is fine no one I
00:03:06.840mean this is not even about what you believe in gender pronouns but she shows this clip gets
00:03:13.460hauled before this three person panel including her own professor another professor from the
00:03:19.620department and the school's gender violence manager because showing a video clip is
00:03:25.140apparently an act of gender violence that requires a gender violence manager from the
00:03:29.640diversity and equity department which is supposedly a department that has to exist and this three
00:03:36.200person panel 45 minute meeting she has the foresight to record what happened in the
00:03:42.260meeting which most students wouldn't think of and thank goodness Lindsay Shepherd did she
00:03:47.780records that and the rest of course is history but where we are now is that
00:03:54.320this story is being litigated in the courtrooms it's already been dealt with on
00:03:59.000the campus it's already been dealt with in the court of public opinion but now
00:04:02.780there are actually three legal cases going on in Canadian courtrooms to deal with what happened
00:04:09.540in that November 2017 meeting and I want to this is so complicated because of how convoluted this story
00:04:18.980is but but please do bear with me here in that meeting one of the ones who got it worse was
00:04:24.500obviously Lindsay Shepherd she was the one being told that this was not a hate crime but basically a
00:04:30.560hate crime they didn't use those words it's my word they were telling her that it was creating
00:04:36.440toxicity in the classroom that it was making it a harmful learning environment for young students
00:04:42.820she was further to that being told that even though they weren't punishing her that her educational
00:04:51.740career would be in jeopardy if she continued doing this type of thing and what happened in that meeting was
00:04:58.820that to drive home the point to Lindsay that she was behaving in a way that they thought wrong
00:05:04.520they went after Jordan Peterson infamously comparing him to Adolf Hitler said no no no if you are going
00:05:13.280to show a clip of Jordan Peterson you can't do it in a neutral way you have to criticize it so they were
00:05:18.920actually telling her you have to be anti Jordan Peterson to have a place in this classroom discussion so she's
00:05:28.580suing because this whole ordeal she says has made her unemployable in her chosen field which is academia
00:05:34.280she's suing Laurier and the three people in that meeting Herbert Pimlott
00:05:38.780Nathan Rambachana who was her professor and Adria Joel who was the you know deputy assistant gender violence coordinator for
00:05:48.500offenses and grievances against mankind or whatever it is and she's suing them three and a half million dollars and you know a lot of people might think that she doesn't have a case and she's suing them three and a half million dollars and you know a lot of people might think that she doesn't have a case
00:05:58.280I don't know I'm not a lawyer but I do think that she was very clearly wronged and this I'm sorry three point six million dollar case is really rooted in that that this inquisition wronged her and was negligent in that it has now damaged her ability to work in academia and if you hear some of the things that Lindsay's written and spoken about about the way that she was treated after this whole thing happened
00:06:28.260uh people not wanting to be in her class professors being very uneasy about her no one really talking to her she was honestly shunned as an outcast after this and this was all because of the school's doing
00:06:40.980but what's interesting here is that Laurier apologized the president of Laurier University apologized to Lindsay in a very public statement that said this shouldn't have happened we've listened to the audio
00:06:53.220and yeah we were wrong you were right and then Nathan Rambacana Lindsay's professor apologized to her directly now this is key he said he was not forced to that he decided to that he took it upon himself
00:07:09.040to apologize from himself and in his apology he also acknowledged that he was wrong to talk about Jordan Peterson the way he did
00:07:21.200he said that he was wrong to compare him to Hitler I'm going to read the exact quote from Nathan Rambacana not about the whole thing but about the Jordan Peterson line in particular
00:07:32.740I implied that Dr. Peterson is like Hitler which is untrue and was never my intention
00:07:40.460while I disagree strongly with many of Dr. Peterson's academic positions and actions
00:07:45.360the tired analogy does him a disservice and was the opposite of useful in our discussion
00:07:52.340so there's an acknowledgement of wrongdoing and more importantly there is an acknowledgement
00:07:56.780that it shouldn't have happened and that he regrets it as part of an apology letter
00:08:01.600and it literally in the first line says I wanted to write to apologize to you
00:08:06.820so Nathan Rambacana apologizes to Lindsay Shepard for this meeting
00:08:10.720and now we bring it to the current time and Nathan Rambacana is actually suing Lindsay Shepard